PO & Invoice Value Not Matching during Intercompany STO

Dear MM Gurus,
Need your input for the below issue.
The MRP(Max Retail Price) in PO is being picked from the supplier region and in Invoice
the MRP(Max Retail Price) is picked from the customer region. Due to this the values from
PO to Invoice do not match.
In actual, the PO ZMRP (Max Retail Price)and ZMAR(Margin Price) needs to be picked from the customer
region instead from the supplier region.
Whether the above condition is possible?
If yes pl suggest a solution

hi,
Seems you have defined you own conditions ZMRP and ZMAR in pricing schema.
Check the access sequence for the condition type, which could give the idea on how to maintain.
harish

Similar Messages

A PO has posted,goods r received but the invoice is not matching with the..

hi
A PO has posted,goods r received but the invoice is not matching with the PO as the TAX was reduced after posting. PLz clarify
can some explain the issue plz

Hi,
1. You are talking about which tax (Is it Excise Duty + CST/VAT) if yes then you can post the Excise invoice with correct duty amount in J1IEX and then same will get defaulted in MIRO as per the duty posted in Excise Invoice not as per PO.
If you have already posted the excise invoice then go for cancellation of same in J1IEX and then cancel GR and Post excise invoice to reverse Part 2 entries and then again do GR and Post Excise invoice with correct amount and then do LIV.
2. If it is only CST / VAT then simply use the appropriate tax code in MIRO as per the revised tax rate.
For e.g. if in PO Tax code is 4% VAT and now if you get invoice of say 1% VAT from vendor then simply select the tax code of 1% VAT in MIRO similarly can be done in case of CST and Service Tax also. Only in case of Excise duty you have to follow the above method.

MIRO and Part II value not matching-so many invoices are pending please

Dear sir
we are facing problem in Miro(Invoice verification)
while goods receipt we changed the base value and also we entred vendor invoice value (migo),As same as Part I we posted Part II also
But while doing MIRO excise values it is picking from PO base value only.not picking from the Migo Base value
Can anybody help me in this.
Thanks
Maruthi S

hai,
Std SAP will copy values from PO history to MIRO screen.if you want change you can change as per your GR value.otherwise post it and do subsquent debit /credit .

Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

Hello everyone,
I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Himanshu Gupta

Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
Himanshu Gupta

Aging report and Control account value not matching

Hi All
The value what i am getting from Vendor liabilities aging and Control account is not matching for the same dates, all my parameters or selection criteria are same
Same report if i am taking for the current date it giving correctly,
If i am trying for a previous day the problem is happening
How can i solve this issue

Hi,
Please check if the transactions are done for different Control Accounts and both the account balances are included in the Aging Report.
Also, check that ALL the customers/vendor groups are taken.
Make sure that you are running the backdated aging with the checkbox as mentioned in the Note 800294.
If still facing problems may be you can provide with more details as to what the control account balances and what is the Aging, difference.
PS: Check if there is any manual journal entry is created in the control account?
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

Dear Experts,
MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
How & where to analysis?
Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
I really appreciate if any one help me
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k

Hello,
I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
How can you catch this document?
Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
I hope it helps to you,
Regards,
Burak

Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Statistic condition values not updated during Sales order Settlement

Hi,
In our client we have different Price condition types for based on scenario wise. Ex: Domestic Sales (ZPR1) and Export Sales ZPR2. I have maintained separately value fields for each price condition types.
We are booking some financial charges, and interest on working capital etc., this cost we need to transfer to COPA each Material wise based on sales revenue.
For this purpose we have created one COPA Assessment Cycle. Tracing factor is Sales Revenue and receiver is Materials.
In COPA Assessment cycle we can give only one base means ZPR1 related value field or ZPR2 related value field.
For this reason we have created one new statistic condition type, what is amount there in ZPR1 that amount will updated automatically in statistic condition place and so that we can give once one trance factor in COPA Assessment Cycle. We have assign this statistic condition all pricing procedure
Now my problem is in MTS scenario statistic condition values updated correctly. But in MTO scenario sales order settlement time statistic condition values not updated.
So is it possible update during sales order settlement time statistic condition values.
Please give me suggestion.
Regards,
Thiru

Hi Ajay Sir,
As you said is correct.
But in our client we have around 9 Plants and each plant manufacturing product are different. Client Requirement is in COPA Report they need see each product wise sales revenue. In this way we mapped product wise value field. System already mapped one guy in this way earlier. Now I am doing some changes for relevant to month end activities.
Some financial changes transfer to COPA each plant wise on Material. Here sender is cost center and receiver is Material. Base is Sales Revenue.
Please suggest me is there any alternative.
Regards,
Thirumalesh .

Value not match in KEAT report with FI

Hi All,
I am going through KEAT report, here is saw that the value of one GL Account in FI value Column does not match with the value of the same GL in FBL3N.
Is there is any particular reason as other GL account value matches with the value in FBL3N.
Regards,
Shayam

KEAT shows values posted from the SD module only. If the value is not the same as the account total, then possibly someone has posted to that account directly from FI (TC FB50 or similar). You should be able to find such manually posted documents in FBL3N by looking at fields like "reference" "document type" and such.

Service Level Report values not matching to Service Level Dashboard v 2.0 values

Hi Experts,
We have installed SLD v2 on a development SQL server along with WSS 3.0. The SLD is pointed to the SCOM datawarehouseDB to collect the information to have it up in the dials.
We have SCOM 2007 R2 who's OpsMgrDB and OpsMgrDWDB are hosted on a SQL 2008 R2 instance.
I have created the Distributed application and added 3 Service level Tracking to it.
Availibility
Processor Utilization
Memory Utilization
The problem here i am facing is that the values in the dials on the SLD Home sites do not match with the values i get when i run the report for Service Level Tracking Summary under reporting tab in Ops
Console.
What could be probable reason for this ?
Regards,
Prajul

Hello,
Here are some articles related to this issue. Hope they are helpful.
Running a Service Level Tracking Report
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212726.aspx
Generating a Service Level Tracking Report
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441422.aspx
The Service Level Tracking Summary Report in System Center Operations Manager 2007 may be empty if TODAY is not selected for the TO date
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567404/en-us
Best regards,
Sophia Sun
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Values not capture during adobe form display on pa30.

Hi Experts,
I have attached Adobe Form into Transaction PA30 in which form values are not capturing during form display,
But its displaying at the time of form generation on ZHINUREQ_CORRS_LETTER program.
Kindly give suggestion.
Regards,
Abdul

Hi Saujanya,
This could by caused by the network, the used browser or additional browser plugins. Try to do the following:
1. Test with an alternative browser (if you are on a SP which supports different browsers than IE, see PAM, http://service.sap.com/pam): If it works with Firefox, then you know the problem is caused by IE and not by the OS, network, ...
2. Deactivate/uninstall all additional browser plugins/add-ons (like google toolbar, Yahoo toolbar, ...)
3. Create a client trace as explained in SAP note 999998. Maybe there's a hint in the trace. Watch for something like "ERROR".
4. Install a HTTP sniffer (like "fiddler") on both machines and compare the network traffic. Maybe there's a request with a 4xx HTTP status code?
5. How is the machine connected to your network? Is it behind an additional webproxy?
Hope one of this helps,
Ralf

MM vs FI report - Stock Values not matching

Dear Experts,
MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
How & where to analysis?
Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
I really appreciate if any one help me
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k
Edited by: navahsek on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 PM

Tthe stock values are matching in the company code level for previous financial year but when checking for few sties, the stock values are not matching.
For Ex. year 2008 MM Stock values Rs. 10 Lakhs & FI values also same Rs.10 Lakhs for the company code level.
If you check the same for few sites( Site1, site2, site3, site4) & same year, the MM & FI values are different.
I really appreciate if you help in this.
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k

Utilization values not matching with g/l accounts

Hi Mentors
while I am doing the utilization (J2IUN) FOR the month april my utilization balances not matching with g/l accounts. till the march my balances is tallying.
why i am not tallying in april. please suggest me.
thanks in advance
Laxman

During utilization, the GL balances are read and shown. Hence there should not be any discrepancy. However, please check the GL transactions for the month of April to find out if any non excise posting (a financial JV, for example) has been entered.
Regards,
Aroop

Excise Invoice values not picking

Hi gurus
I am doing a plant rollout. We have existing plants 1000, 2000 and 3000. In the same location we are creating 2 more new plants 4000 and 5000.So we are using the same excise group and series group. i did all the configurations in SPRO> LG> Taxes on goods movement>India.....i have maintained plant settings, default series group and excise group etc. We are using the same pricing procedure for exports irrespective of the plants.Condition records for BED,Ecess and SHEcss are maintained sales organisationwise. In sales order excise values are coming properly and also in billing. but when i create the excise invoice, no values are coming. what could be the reason?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Mathan

Regarding Export cycle for excise Duties,
you have to use validation.
Tcode: SE37
J_1I7_USEREXIT_DUTY_IN_EXPORT
Code:
FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_DUTY_IN_EXPORT.
""Local interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(YVBRK) TYPE VBRK
*" EXPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(SUPPRESS_CALCULATION) TYPE J_1IEXCHDR-STATUS
*If you do not want the excise duty to be calculated for a particular
*transaction then you need to mark the flag supress_calculation as 'X'
*This flag when left blank will trigger calculation of ED during j1ii
*When it is marked, the ED copied from billing will be left as it is
*{   INSERT         DEVK900956                                        1
SUPPRESS_CALCULATION = 'X' .
*}   INSERT
ENDFUNCTION.

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

PO & Invoice Value Not Matching during Intercompany STO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for