POC based Results Analysis for Service Order/ Contract

Issue resolved. Please close the message.
Hi Friends,
We have a process where we create a service order and plan costs on the order.
Later a contract will be created with billing plan. The contract is assigned to service order manually.
After actual costs are booked to the service order the same is settled to Contract.
When I run RA for Contract I dont see the Activity rate planned costs so the POC is not giving correct results.
The planned material costs are being updated though.
I have mapped the activity cost element to a line id and COS in RA configuration.
Please let me know if I am missing anything here.
Thanks in Advance,
Vamsi
Edited by: VSS on Oct 23, 2010 10:49 PM

Hi,
We need to implement the following OSS note:
OSS Note 1259154.
Also please check if 1159784
is relevant for your system.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Similar Messages

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

Could be one of these possibilities:
1) Controlling Area set is wrong
2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
Assign Points if useful....

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Results Analysis on Sales Orders

Hi Fellows,
When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
I saw the help for this and it says
" Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
Thanks in advance..
Srik

Hi,
Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
Regards,
P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

Results Analysis in sales order (KKA3)

Hi experts : i have a sales order with results analysis key 00004 , but in transaction KKA3 the value of cost plannig is the same of real cost. The COSP table from where obtain cost planning value ?.
Could you send me more information about results analysis for sales order .
Thank's for your cooperation
Veronica Barrientos A.
Construmart S.A.

Hi Siva:
I checked my configs ,it's right . I think if my strategy is MTS (make to stock ). maybe the reason is that .But now my strategy is MTO(make to order).maybe I miss other configs.

Plan costs calculation during results analysis of sales order

Hi Experts,
I am in process of implementing sales order costing. I am facing a problem during result analysis with plan costs data.
We have a sales order for which production order is generated. Cost object is sales order.
Say, sales order cost estimate which is the plan costs --> is $ 1000 (which includes prod order COGM of $ 600) (So remaining sales and admin costs are $ 400)
Plan cost of production order is $ 550 (as per production order cost analysis report)
While calculating the result analysis for sales order, system is calculating the plan costs data as $ 1000 + $ 550 = $ 1550
As a result, I feel plan costs data during result analysis is over calculated.
I feel either plan costs should be $ 1000 (as it already includes COGM part)
or
$ 950 which is (plan cost of production order $ 550 + sales and admin costs of $ 400)
Could some one explain me why result analysis shows plan costs data as $ 1500 and if I need to rectify how can I do so.
Thanks,
GAN

Any suggestions please.
Edited by: DSK on Feb 9, 2012 6:16 AM
Edited by: DSK on Feb 13, 2012 4:39 AM

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

Results Analysis for Contracts

Dear Experts,
My Client requires to do Results Analysis for Contracts. Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Shareeq

Dear Ahemad,
In what would be the output of the result analysis ?I mean from sales point of view if u see then u will have to develop the report accordingly.
If you are talking abt the MM contract then there are some std reports available.
If ur talking abt the customer service point of view then we this std transaction IP51.
thanks and regards
raghav

No results when running KOB1 for Service Orders

Hi gurus,
We have a process with Service Orders where actual costs are posted.
When running report KOB1 for service orders with actual posts, no result is showing.
Any idea why this is happening?
Thanks,
VL

Hi Victor
Try to check this options:
1-be sure the posting date range is corrected.
2-be sure the layout choosen is not set some filter. Try to disable all filters.
If you checked this points and even after is not working.
Try to run FBL3N for the account posted, open financial document and check if a Controlling document was generated.
Check if the account is a cost element in KA03.
Regards

How to execute Result analysis for a Single order?

HI,
I need to execute Result analysis for a single process order. But i found cumulative RA. Can any one provide the Individual Result analysis execution T.code?
Thanks
KB

Hi,
Use "KKAX"-->individual WIP calculation
"KKAO"-->Collect WIP calculation
Thanks,
Rau

Settlement Rule for service order created based on sales order

Hello,
I am creating a sales order and entering WBS as an cost object.
After creation of sales order the Service order is created.
For service order type in the settlement profile WBS is maintained.
But the system is not copying the WBS in Service order which is maintained in sales order.
Can any body have an idea on this?
Regards
Abhijit

Hi,
As far as my understanding when service order is created through sales order then settlement rule is SDI and its item number
Not what you maintained in account assignment tab of sales order
When you settle service order then cost will settle on sales document and its item and then latter you settle sales order then settlement receiver is WBS element which you maintained in account assignment tab
Kapil

WBS Settlement rule control for service orders

Hello,
We have an requirement to implement validation point for service order settlement rule. Currently there is no validation check of settlment rule for service order. So that the settlement is happend to incorrect receivers in service orders.
For example :
Service order created for company code - 400 and the settlement rule receiver should be WBS which is belongs to same company code but some case , user are maintained wrong WBS in settlement rule which belongs to some other company code.
Can you please hlep us on this requirement and suggest any enhencement point avalible on the same.
Thanks
Risha

Hi,
Please go to okg2,
Calculate wip or result analysis
remove the tick for Order In Engineer to Order Production
Now run result analysis and check whether settlement will not happen for cross company code.
please check this and revert back.
Thanking you
Vengaiah Chowdary

Quotation Creation and Billing for Service Orders--node details needed

Hi ,
I need to work on node "Quotation Creation and Billing for Service Orders" ....I see lot of integration with SD and FICO . Can any one give details about integrations required and what is done in this node ....
Regards
NPB

There are different steps to be done for that.
1. Create DIP Profile in ODP1 & check the consistency in ODP2 - DIP will be used to bill the customer based on resource (labor & material) usage. Creation of DIP profile has been discussed many times in this forum. Please check.
2. Assign the Quotation document type & Billing type used in DIP profile to your sales area - Your document type should be assigned to your sales organisation, distribution channel & division combination.

Results Analysis for Projects

Hi Guys,
We use Results analysis for projects and also we use RA in Product Costing.
Can anyone let me know what exactly does this Results Analysis mean ( not in SAP terms ).
I am trying to look for this over help.sap.com and google but could not find information on what exactly this term means.
Also how is this related to WIP?
Please clarify.
Thanks,
Srikanth.

Dear srikusap,
Calculation WIP through the SAP, RA key will play important role. Work in process calculation is diferent from industry to industry.
In SAP RA key will shows the WIP amount while u running KKAX Transaciton Code. After when ever u do the settlement then ti will be settled to Financial Account. At that time A Accounting Document was generaged. when ever the Order Status is Teco then the provious period WIP will be reversed.
Revert back if u any calrification.
Raj

POC based Results Analysis for Service Order/ Contract

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for