Posting manual SD conditions to COPA

Hi,
I have customized KE4I transaction with all the SD condition types, but when the billing document has the conditions filled manually it doesn't appear in the PA document.
Is it possible to post this conditions to COPA?
Thank you very much!!!

You could try KE26 for reposting, if it were subsequently added. May be the condition type has to do something with statistical or non statistical? Refer also to the note 20254 .

Similar Messages

User exit to copy Manual pricing conditions with in sales documents

Hi all,
I have a situation where i have to copy the manual pricing conditions from inquiry to quotation.
Problem: From VA21 when I try to do the same using the tab "create with reference" the document is being copied but the manually set pricing condition in the inquiry is not being copied into quotation. This is because in the copy controls the pricing type is set to 'B' which means "carry out new pricing". I can change it to 'C' or 'D' so that it copies manual pricing but i am not allowed to do so because other sales orgs in the company has a problem if i do so. Only our perticular sales org needs this config. I cannot even create another item catogory specific to this plant because it is against the rules of the company. So I am looking for a user exit in which i can change this pricing type during runtime so that i can plug in some code specific to this sales org to copy manual pricing. I have found one from the SAP note 24832 (MV61AFZA). It doesn't work as i think its obsolte. Can anyone suggest me a better way of solving this issue. Any quick response is appreciated.
Thanks,
Giridhar.

Hi
The following EXITS may help you
Exit Name              Description
SDTRM001            Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
V45A0002            Predefine sold-to party in sales document
V45A0003            Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0004            Copy packing proposal
V45E0001            Update the purchase order from the sales order
V45E0002            Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
V45L0001            SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
V45P0001            SD customer function for cross-company code sales
V45S0001            Update sales document from configuration
V45S0003            MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
V45S0004            Effectivity type in sales order
V45W0001            SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
V46H0001            SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
V60F0001            SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
V45A0001            Determine alternative materials for product selection
Regards
PRabhu

Manual price condition (%) in order creation (using ABAP)

Dear community members,
I could use some help on a problem I have encountered while creating a sales order (in the CRM system) using ABAP programming, the details are given hereunder:
I have two manual price conditions used to set a possible discount, one using a straight value and one using a percentage:
1. When the order is generated using the value (let us say 100€) it cointains the correct price condition.
2. On the other hand, when the order is generated using percentages (i.e. 10%), it is created without explicit errors or warnings but with no price condition in it.
For the latter case I have checked the IPC logs (from transaction SM53) finding this error message:
Message: Condition cannot be processed manually
--> com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.exc.ManualChangeNotAllowedException: Condition YSCP cannot be processed manually
at com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.impl.PricingCondition.changeConditionRate(Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;)V(PricingCondition.java:3124)
at com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.impl.HeaderCondition.changeConditionRate(Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;)V(HeaderCondition.java:387)
at com.sap.spe.pricing.transactiondata.impl.PricingDocument.addHeaderCondition(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/math/BigDecimal;Ljava/lang/String;C)Lcom/sap/spe/pricing/transactiondata/IHeaderCondition;(PricingDocument.java :1472)
at com.sap.spe.document.rfc.AddPricingConditions.handleDocRequest()V(AddPricingConditions.java:131)
at com.sap.spe.document.rfc.DocHandlerAdapter.handleRequest()V(DocHandlerAdapter.java:72)
at com.sap.spe.base.util.jco.HandlerAdapter.handleRequest(Lcom/sap/vmc/RFCContainer/Call;)V(HandlerAdapter.java:117)
at com.sap.vmc.remserver.RFCDispatcher.handleRequest2(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/JCoFunction;)V(RFCDispatcher.java:995)
at com.sap.vmc.remserver.RFCDispatcher.handleRequest(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/JCoFunction;)V(RFCDispatcher.java:746)
at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.VMCServer.dispatchRequest(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/JCoFunction;)V(VMCServer.java:911)
at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.MiddlewareJavaRfc$JavaRfcServer.dispatchRequest(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/rt/ServerWorker;Ljava/lang/String;)V(MiddlewareJavaRfc.java:3415)
at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.MiddlewareJavaRfc$JavaRfcServer.listen(Lcom/sap/conn/jco/rt/ServerWorker;)V(MiddlewareJavaRfc.java:2468)
at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.VMCServer.listen()V(VMCServer.java:766)
at com.sap.conn.jco.rt.VMCServer.run()V(VMCServer.java:689)
at com.sap.vmc.remserver.RfcServer.run()V(RfcServer.java:376)
at java.lang.Thread.startup(Z)V(Thread.java:1954)
I have already debugged FM CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN but to no avail, maybe I just missed something and I can assure that the customizing is correct and aligned between the systems and both the conditions are set to be processed manually.
At this point, since the condition is applied when the commit is yet to be done I wonder whether it is possible to apply a discount percentage on prices which are yet to be generated, it would be illogical to do so and then again while using a straight value (which does not require a calculation) the order is correctly generated.
Furthermore when I add the conditions in an order (from both the GUI and the WUI) the table IT_PRIDOC is alway empty, even if CT_INPUT_FIELD is populated.
I know that there are similar posts here in SCN but sadly I was not able to find a solution so any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance for any replies given,
Alessandro.

Dear Padma,
apologies for my late reply. I also thought it should be possible to use a percentage but I was not sure.
Sadly the debugging did not bring about any positive result.
I also tried to make a second CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN call after the system generated all the pricing conditions but that also did not work.
There is one thing that caught my attention though:
- YSCV (fixed amount): still no problem at all (passed to KBETR);
- YSCP (percent): if I assign a value to KWERT or if I leave all the fields empty, the condition is created in the sales order but it is always set to 0%. However, if I try to assign it to KBETR, I always get the message: "Condition YSCP cannot be processed manually".
I made some attempts with the customizing, for example adding the condition to the "easy entries" or playing with the options of "Create Condition Types" (always aligning the systems) without getting positive output.
I am beginning to think that it could be an IPC-related problem (which is not my area of expertise... yet).
Alessandro.

Trading goods MM Conditions into COPA ( Condition wise)

Dear Experts,
Any possibility is there to get the MM Pricing conditions into COPA like SD Conditions with out activating IS Retail Module.
Any alternative method or MM condition Types into COPA.
Regards,
Goda

Hi,
Yes, it is possible to post values into Value fields of PA by assigning the MM Conditions in KE4IM like what we do for SD conditions in KE4I.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

Can pricing requirement be used for manual header condition

I have a manual header condition ZCR1 which will be entered in a sales document with doc type ZAB1. When this sales document is copied into another sales document ZAB2, I want that the manual header condition ZCR1 is not determined. Can I do this via pricing requirement? Or should I use alternation formula for condition base value and make the value of condition ZCR1 to zero when the document is copied into ZAB2.
Both the document types are using the same pricing procedure. In copy control for all item categories from ZAB1 to ZAB2, pricing type G (Copy pricing elements unchanged and re-determine taxes). ZCR1 is a manual condition in the pricing procedure used.
Regards
Javed

Hi javed
If you want the ZCR1 manual header condition should not be determined then you need to change the pricing type in the copy control but if you assign a requirement in the pricing procedure for ZCR1 condition type then you cant enter the ZCR1 condition type manually also as you are not meeting your requirement.
Another option is you have to create a new requirement with the help of Technical consultant ans assign it to the header condition type in the pricing procedure requirement feild . giving inputs to your Technical consultant that The condition type should not be determined
Regards
Srinath

Message# AA649 In area 01, you can only post manual dep. up to the amount

hi friends
when i do the transaction in ABAA ,it went error said that In area 01, you can only post manual dep. up to the amount 0
i had select allowed all value in unplan depreciation ,and why the detail message said the The asset does not have any net book value; in this case, you should check the transaction as described above.
Asset affected: 000025100073-0000
Diagnosis
This posting cannot be performed, since manual depreciation can only be posted in the amount of            0.00 in area 01.
Procedure
Check the transaction type entered, or change the posting amount.
Caution: If the amount concerned is 0, this could be the result of two situations:
1. The asset does not have any net book value; in this case, you should check the transaction as described above.
2. The asset has a depreciation key with automatic depreciation calculation. However, if you want to include depreciation in addition to the automatically calculated depreciation, it has to be unplanned depreciation.
Otherwise, you should use a depreciation key that does not calculate automatic depreciation (SAP-supplied key: MANU).
thanks

Hi,
1) Transaction type 640 normally is a previous year transaction type. My suggestion is that you have no values from previous years.
You use the transaction type 640.
Please check if it works with transaction type 650.
Check the setting from the transaction types:
Table TABW (SE16)
=================
Trans. Type........Trans.Type grp.
640.........................64
650.........................65
Table TABWG
==============
Trans.Type grp. ...........Curr.-yr.acq. transaction
64
65..................................................X
The difference between this 2 transaction types 640 and 650 is the sign TABWG-XZUGNE (Current-year acquisition transaction) in the transaction type group.
2. Please see the text passage from 13221 point 2:
2. An incorrect depreciation key is used. Manual depreciation and
    automatic calculation of the same depreciation type are mutually
    exclusive.
    If another depreciation must be set in addition to the automatically
    calculated depreciation, there has probably been an unplanned
    depreciation.
    If the asset should have only manual depreciation, please use
    another depreciation key, for example, 'MANU'.     ..."
regards Bernhard

Manual rebate condition exclusion not refreshed after redetermination of it

Hi Experts.
I am working with CRM 4.0.
Lately, we realized there is an error occurring in the price deternination:
The condition exclusion for manual rebate condition is not refreshed after redetermination of the product. There is missing a price validation before saving the document with the new product.
Step-to-step description of the error:
1)     I am creating an order in trx. CIC0 or CRMD_BUS2000115 and determine the product (sector A).
2)     Now I assign a manual rebate (condition Z...) of 20 % on item level.
3)     On header level I replace the product to one of another sector (B).
4)     I check the pricing conditions of the new product on item level. The same rebate of 20 % is maintained.
This is an error, because the condition exclusion for products of sector B allows rebates only until 5 %.
Can anybody help me, please.
Best regards,
Cristina

This is not standard due to information of SAP OSS.

Manual Freight condition without Tax

Hi Experts,
I am looking for some help on setting up a Manual Freight condition in the Order but one that does not include Taxes.
I have created a copy of the Header Freight condition KF00 and everything looks fine except the Tax condition MWST takes this value also into account when calculating Tax.
How do I get my ZF00 freight charge to appear in the Net value but without Tax. I've read a few notes about moving the conditions around in the procedure but that then causes more issues as we have quite a lot of active conditions in V/08.
Any other way of using condition category or calculation type to achieve this?
Thanks in advance.
Sal

You can place this freight condition type below the tax condition type in your pricing procedure.
G. Lakshmipathi

Manual Princing Condition not copied using BAPI

Hi Guys,
Something pretty weird has been happening.. when I create a Sales Order over VA01 with reference a Contract, the Sales Order take the COMPLETE Contract Princing Condition, so its perfect. But When we're trying to use the BAPI (BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 ) it does not create in the same way, I mean the MANUAL Pricing condition was deleted of my Sales Order Princing condition or does not show up for any reason.
do you know if there is a flag or some configuration where I set "Take the contract Princing condition"?
Thank you in advance!
Alexandre

Guy,
Only to let all of you know that the soluion was call the function "PRICING_COPY" at the KOMP user exit and thus load the XKOMV table. It was because the standard process did not call this step when called througth the BAPI.
Regards,
Alexandre

Manual Excise Condition JEXC in MM Pricing

Hi Friends,
In purchase order conditions,I am using statistical manual excise condition jexc in MM Pricing for overwriting the value of excise condition (JMOP) appearing through tax code into the purchase order.This condition is maintained in MM pricing procedure with sub total 5 (Carry over value to KOMP-KZWI5)
Need you expert advice How this condition is over writing its value to JMOP condition in taxes tab of purchase.Actually this clarification is required by the client i have already conveyed referring it as a standard solution.But client is not conviced and i have to confirm this tomorrow.
So if anybody can help me on this issue i shall be very very thank ful
Regards
Vivek

Hello Friends,
Can anybody throw light on this issue.
Regards
Vivek Sharma

Update Sales Order to enter a Manual Price Condition

Hello all,
SAP R/3 ERP
It is already created the Sales Order, Picking and Delivery (good issue is NOT created yet).
I can not continue my flow because is missing a pricing condition.
However the condition that is missing is an Header Manual Condition Price.
As we are dealing with a Header Condition and Good Issue and Billing is not created, it is possible to update the Sales Order and then enter the header manual condition .
My question is:
'--- In order to update the Sales Order to enter the header manual condition, do I need to delete the Delivery and Picking? If yes, what are the transaction de delete both of them? .
Thanks a lot,
Barbara

In my opinion, there is no need to delete the delivery. Just add the manual pricing condition and click on update pricing button ->carry out new pricing. This will add the manual pricing in the sales order. Still if you want to delete the delivery, then first check whether the picking is done using transfer order. If so, use t.code LT15 to cancel the transfer order. If transfer order is not used, then just remove the pick quantity from delivery line items and then in t.code VL02N, enter the delivery document go to menu delivery document ->delete. This will delete the delivery document.
Regards,

Manual VAT condition in Purchase order

Hi,
For the job work process, my client has following requirement.
Job work cost ---> 10,000 Rs
Consumables used --> 5000 Rs
VAT on consumables ( 5%) --> 250 Rs
Now issue is, at the time of purchase order, they are not sure about the consumable cost so the VAT charges are also not fixed.
It is only at the time of invoice ( MIRO) that they would know exactly consumables and VAT.
We can add manual VAT condition in Pricing Schema, but then it should not appear in PO, but should be there at the time of MIRO.
Please guide on the same.
Regards
Trupti Deulkar

Enter/Change invoice amount manually in MIRO,add g/l account tab, enter vat g/l acct tab,enter vat amount.
If enterred consumbable value increase / decrease from GR value will effect stock account accordingly.

Manual Excise condition type with calculation type as FIXED AMOUNT

Dear Gurus,
I have used a manual excise condition (JMAN) in my pricing procedure the difference is that I've changed its calcultaion type to FIXED AMOUNT.
And in the same pricing procedure I have also got a percentage based Excise condition (ZEXC).
And in any transaction either of the one that is JMAN or ZEXC will be used.
The Manual Excise condition is used basically when the raw material sale takes place. The requirement is as such that they should be able to enter the duty value in INR and not in percentage. Please go through the example below
*(For Example I am procuring raw material of 100 kg worth 10000 at 8% of excise duty. Excise duty will be 800 for 10000rs. So it will be 8 rs per KG.
And now suppose I am utilizing 80 kg for production and want to sell remaining 20 kg. the Excise duty charged should be 160 rs. considering the rate per unit is 8rs.)*
In this case user wants to enter the value in INR and not in percentage.
And normally for the finished goods the percentage based condition is used.
Now what my issue is that how will I copy the value from JMAN to ZEXC at the raw material sale. otherwise my finished good sales is happening without any problem.
For this should I use any routine to copy the values from ZMAN to ZEXC??
Or rather is it possible that I could copy values from a condition type whose calculation type is FIXED AMOUNT to other condition whose calculation type is percentage.
How should I go ahead with this??
Please guide me.
Any answers??
Cant Do it this way??
Thanks & Regards
Anand.k
Edited by: anand k on Jul 8, 2009 6:38 AM
Edited by: anand k on Jul 8, 2009 1:04 PM

Check the condtion value in condition type UTXJ . If the JMOD value is 10% of UTXJ then assessable value should have been maintained for the Material and Plant combination in J1ID. This is due to Routine 351 maintined in pricing procedure for the condition type UTXJ
check and confirm
Senthils

Update correspondence history (DFKKCOHI) when posting manually via FPE1

Hi experts,
Here is a difficult one. I need to update the correspondance history when posting manually certain types of documents via FPE1. I was told to use business event 723 - Correspondence : Free --> Create (tcode FQEVENTS) that is one of the events for Document. I thought that by creating and activating my customer function module Z_FKK_SAMPLE_0723 it should be enough, placing my own code there. But I can see that when I post a document via FPE1 this event is never triggered, even though now is activated. Am I missing something??
After a lot of debugging I found out that event 1118 is called instead (one of the events called among others).
From include LFKPPFB0
* finally call the posting module
CALL FUNCTION 'FKK_CREATE_DOC'
    EXPORTING
      I_FKKKO          = FKKKO
      I_UPDATE_TASK    = ' '
      I_FKKOPL_CF      = 'X'
      I_DIALOG         = 'X'
    IMPORTING
      E_OPBEL          = XOPBEL
    TABLES
      T_FKKOP          = XFKKOP
      T_FKKOPK         = XFKKOPK
      T_FKKOPW         = XFKKOPW
      T_FKKOPL         = XFKKOPL
      T_FKKOPKC        = XFKKOPKC
      T_FKKOPREL       = XFKKOPREL
      T_FKKOP_ESR      = XFKKOPESR
    EXCEPTIONS
      ERROR_MESSAGE    = 4.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    PERFORM EVENT_1118.
ELSE.
    PERFORM MESSAGE_STORE USING '1119'.
    PERFORM MESSAGES_SHOW.
    PERFORM OKCODE_OVER.
ENDIF.
And that this event (FKK_SAMPLE_1118) is empty so you can write your own code there. But I don't know how risky this is.
Please I need some advice with this issue. My two questions are:
- 1) why event 723 is not triggered when I do I manual post?? What do I have to do to trigger it?
- 2) My plan B is to force the call to event 723 from event 1118, which I for sure know that is triggered. Anybody can see any problem in this?
Anybody has been in a similar situation making a new event in FQEVENTS?
Thanks in advance, points will surely be rewarded.
Elena

Hi Prashant,
Thanks for that. YES! That may be to update text in document. But while uploading invoices I will not have document number details, it will be created when we process batch which been created using rfbibl00. How can I capture document numbers after processing batch session? Because with document number details I will able to use SAVE_TEXT to update remaining text fields. So can you please suggest best way to do this if you can? Many thanks.
Regards,
Tim

Automatic Posting of Purch Condition (Not Require Invoice Verification)

For each line on the purchase order we have a number of different conditions types. PB00 (Gross Price), ZLFR(Land Freight), ZSTX(State Gallonage Tax) are just a few that we have. Currently all the conditions required invoice verification once the p.o. has been received. What we would like to do is automtically post the ZSTX condition without having to do the invoice verification. The other condtion would required invoice verification as normal. Is this possible and if so how should I go about doing the configuration?

From the wording of your question I presume that you do not use a Goods Receipt. Correct me if I am wrong.
A solution for you question would be to use Goods Receipt in your process and configure your ZSTX condition to post an amount against an account that you determine via the standard account determination (similar to SAP's freight conditions).
The amount from PB00 would then be handled via a GR/IR account.
Here's an entry point for Some Selected Conditions
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee131355c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Best,
Ralf

Posting manual SD conditions to COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for