Posting Rule for EBS

Hi,
I have configured Posting Rule for Incoming paymnets and works fine including posting area 2 by clearing Open Item of Customer.
I tried the exact opposite way for Vendor.
It creates GL posting ( Posting area 1 ) but error in Posting area 2 . It does not clear.
I need some clarity  on Posting type ( 4,5,7,8 etc) As when to use ?
What is the standard Posing rule for Outward paymnent and to clear OI of Vendor?
Appreciate to get yr response .
Thanks and Regards,
Chitra

You can either post to GL or Sub account by selecting the appropriate indicator in 'Define Posting Rules' step.  You can try giving the reversal Reason for a posting rule after setting the appropriate accounts and try using the Interpretation algorithm 011 Payment document.  Or see if any algorithm found in your system for treating reversal of documents or bounced cheques.
If this doesnt work, you might have to write your own interpretation algorithm and attach it in the 'Assign External Transaction to Posting Rules' step.  You can also try raising an OSS message to find out if any standard interpretation algorithms exist already for bounced cheques.
Ravi.

Similar Messages

  • EBS - Electronic Bank Statement Multiple Posting Rule for One External Transaction Type NTRF

    hello SAP Gurus,
    I'm configuring EBS - Electronic Bank Statement. My requirement is for Bank External Transaction Type NTRF <for Incoming Payment> I want to assign 2 posting rules for Posting Area 2 that is Sub-Ledger posting viz. <1> For the payments received from Customer which should clear the Customer Open item since it is bill to bill exactly matching the open line item and <2> For the payments which should not clear the Customer Open item since i know that they are not bill to bill and only partial against the original line item
    Is this possible? if yes then how?
    Currently, SAP allows only one assignment like one external transaction type NTRF => one Posting Rule <either clear the sub-ledger-system picks FB05 or just post on Sub-ledger so that not to clear - system uses FB01 >
    Journal for Posting Area 2:
    Bank Clearing Account Dr
       To Customer Account Cr  <either set this to clear with original invoice / or just post on customer so as to clear/handle it manually later on once paid fully>
    So, what is the solution; how can i differentiate my incoming whether fully payment or partial payment; since bank statement always tag it to external transaction type NTRF always for any incoming payments !
    regards,
    `raj. 

    Hi,
    You cannot create separate rule with sub ledger postings while executing electronic bank reconciliation.The reason is your bill to bill transfers should posted to bank sub ledger account first and then you can write a BDC to clear sub ledger account.Otherwise use F.13 to clear the sub ledger account.
    Regards
    Chrishantha

  • EBS Posting rule for Bounced checks

    Hi experts,
    I need to configure posting rule for returned/bounced cheque(AP and AR) for EBS.
    Can any one please provide me the steps for the entries to be posted in bank accounts and subledger.
    Thanks,
    Sapuser

    You can either post to GL or Sub account by selecting the appropriate indicator in 'Define Posting Rules' step.  You can try giving the reversal Reason for a posting rule after setting the appropriate accounts and try using the Interpretation algorithm 011 Payment document.  Or see if any algorithm found in your system for treating reversal of documents or bounced cheques.
    If this doesnt work, you might have to write your own interpretation algorithm and attach it in the 'Assign External Transaction to Posting Rules' step.  You can also try raising an OSS message to find out if any standard interpretation algorithms exist already for bounced cheques.
    Ravi.

  • Posting rule for assembly order for item 000000 could not be generated

    Hi all,
        While creating production order from sales order system giving an error message 'Posting rule for assembly order for item 000000 could not be generated.'
        Kindly help to resolve the issue.
    SmanS

    Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
    What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

  • Posting rules for account key

    friends
    please i am trying to post into a G/L and got this error message "No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B"
    please how do i resolve this i am new into FI
    thanks in advance

    Hi,
    T007B is maintained via OBCN transaction.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Error AC519 while Specifing Intervals and Posting Rules for Depreciation.

    hi,
    i deleted one company code from system and now tring to execute t-code OAYR. i checked there is no assignment of company code with chart of depriciation.
    error is like
    Company code XXXX is not defined
    Message no. AC519
    Here XXXX is deleted company code code.
    how to resolve this now?
    thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    AC519 rises always due to inconsistent customizing. Therefore, this issue is out of the scope of support.                                                                               
    You have to check the content of tables T093C, T093U, T093B, T093D. 
    There might be entries with value '    ' (initial).                                                                               
    You can delete those entries via debugging or with a self-created   z* program for that scope.  
    regards Bernhard

  • Posting rules exist for account key

    Hi ,
    I got the message while creating PO AND WHEN I try to enter Tax code and Tax Jurisdiction i am getting the following error message :
    No posting rules exist for account key
    Message no. FF714
    Diagnosis
    No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
    Procedure
    Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
    can any one give me solution to solve this issue !!!
    Thanks & Regards,
    senthil.

    Hi Senthil
    Based on your explanation I can understand that the Configuration settings for Automatic Account Determination is not done perfectly for the Account Ket vs GL Account. Do cneck this process carefully because here we define the posting rule, posting keys for the determined account key and later assign the same to the GL Account.
    regards
    Murali Kanth Natti

  • No posting rules exist for account key

    Hi
    When i am creating PO with Excise, it shows the below error:
    No posting rules exist for account key
    Message no. FF714
    Diagnosis
    No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
    Procedure
    Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
    I have checked OB40, OBCN, OBYC, but unable resolve. correct me if i miss anything??
    Regards
    Prasanna

    I have checked OBQ3 & OBCN. And changed the transcation key, but still same exist.
    This is first excise po.
    hope am not missing any thing.
    Regards
    Prasanna

  • No posting rules exist for account key - ME21N

    Hi all!
       I am raising a PO and while assigning the tax code system throws me an error as below,
    ___No posting rules exist for account key___
    No posting rules exist for account key
    Message no. FF714
    Diagnosis
    No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
    Procedure
    Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
    Thanks in advance,
    Raj.

    Hi
    Goto OBYC and then select your transaction key
    Thne enter Chart of account -
    Define maintain Pposting ket and rule
    Regards
    vivek

  • Product costing error while defining posting rules

    Hi Friends,
    When I'm trying to define posting rules for settling WIP using OKG8,
    I get an error msg "GL account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element" and the aforesaid account is WIP (P&L account).
    The long text of the error msg is as follows:
    G/L account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element
    Message no. KQ119
    Diagnosis
    When maintaining the posting rules for passing on results analysis data to Financial Accounting, you entered a G/L account that is defined as a primary cost element in cost and revenue element accounting. This is not allowed. You must enter a G/L account in the posting rules that is not defined as a cost element.
    System Response
    The entry invalid.
    Procedure
    You have the following options:
    Enter a G/L account for which no cost element is specified in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
    You can change the message type with user-defined error management (transaction OPR4_KKA). What should be observed when you enter a G/L account in a posting rule that is defined as a primary cost element in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting? You need to define a CO account assignment so that the posting defined in the posting rule can be executed. You do this with transaction OKB9 (default account assignment) or OKC9 (substitution), or using the default account assignment in the cost element master.
    Could anyone suggest me on this.
    The steps that I've already defined as far as the account are concerned:
    1. Have defined the aforesaid account as a cost element
    2. Assigned Prodn. C CTR in OKB9 agnst the same.
    But then I dont understand why the system pops up this msg, saying, cannot be created as a cost element, wherein the account is already a cost element.
    Plz suggest
    regards
    sandhya

    Hiya,
    WIP accounts (neither Inventory nor Offset) should NEVER be created as Cost Elements.
    In most manufacturing scenarios, costs are tracked on the P&L. During period-end, since there is the risk of writing off some issues to the Production/Process/Sales Order, SAP has introduced the complex but ingenious system called Results Analysis that moves the balance of all open Orders to the Balance Sheet.
    If the Order balance is (+)ve, the P&L is credited and the Balance Sheet is debited and vice versa. When you display the Order costs at period-end, the WIP costs are not considered. In order to calculate WIP, we have separate RA GL accounts that track costs independently of the Orders. Therefore, these are never created as Cost Elements. Creating these as Cost Elements would force the system to inadvertently post the WIP costs back on the Order (alongwith posting these to the B/S??? - an unimaginable situation).
    At period-end, you have postings like:
    Dr WIP Inventory Account
    Cr WIP Offset Account
    and, this is reversed at settlement:
    Cr WIP Offset Account
    Dr WIP Inventory Account
    Along with this, the system calculates the Actual COS for the finished product. Neither of the two WIP accounts used above is created as a Cost Element. If you have created any of these as Cost Elements, the system will not allow you to save OKG8. Delete the Cost Element and then try saving the posting rule.
    (PS: The "Cost Element" field in this screen has a different use. It is used to specify if a Secondary Cost Element from the RA Update table should be posted to a G/L Account. This is not meant for Primary Cost Elements. I think these Secondary CEs are of type 31 (requires confirmation - no SAP access right now). As you may have guessed, you can only enter either the RA Category or this Secondary CE).
    You may also delete the OKB9 assignment to the Cost Centre. It is redundant.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers.

  • Define Search String for EBS

    Has anyone ever used target field EBFK0A1 BDC Account Type successfully?  If so, can you please explain the basic settings?
    We want to influence changing the G/L account number for posting area 1, line item 1.  Any specific examples would be very helpful.  We wish to avoid the creation of a new posting rule for each G/L account.
    Regards,
    Sandy

    When creating search strings, I use both the mapping and the target field - the mapping is the value that is assigned to the target field.  Take my ACH RETURN example from my previous post.  The text ACH RETURN comes through in the note to payee and I use that to change the posting rule to posting rule Z120.
    I set up a search string with search string value "ACH RETURN" and the following mapping:
    A->Z
    C->1
    H->2
    space->0
    R->blank
    E->blank
    T->blank
    U->blank
    R->blank
    N->blank
    Then in the search string usage, I assigned the search string to target field "Posting Rule".
    When the BAI file is loaded, if SAP finds "ACH RETURN" in the note to payee, it maps that value to Z120 and then assigns Z120 to the Posting Rule.  Make sense?
    No, we do not have any cross-company transactions coming through in our BAI files.
    We do not have any cases where one transaction in the BAI file offsets transactions in multiple GL accounts.  We do have situations where one transaction in the BAI file offsets multiple transactions in one GL account.  For most of those cases, I'm using interpretation algorithm 121 (Reference document number search without test read) and using a search string to extract the reference number from the note to payee that matches to the reference number on the documents.
    We do, however, have a scenario where we use a user exit to select multiple transactions from a GL account to clear against one transaction from the bank statement.  The user exit is ZXF01U01 (Enhancement FEB00001, Function Module EXIT_RFEBBU10_001).  We have logic in the user exit to find the line items to clear and populate those line items in table T_FEBCL.  SAP then uses T_FEBCL to post the BAI transaction.  If your user can come up rules for clearing the transactions from the multiple GL accounts, you might be able to use this user exit to accomplish the clearing.
    If the user cannot come up with rules that you can program, then I would suggest a process change.  Either the postings need to be originally made as one posting to one account.  Or once the multiple items are posted, they need to be manually cleared into one account/one posting prior to the BAI file being loaded.  Or you leave the process of posting to multiple GL accounts as is and the user has to clear the postings manually via post-processing (FEBA/FEBAN).
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Shannon
    Edited by: Shannon Moberg on Jun 16, 2010 9:55 AM

  • No posting rules exits in acct key Mess no.FF714 in trx.FF70

    Dear All,
    We have already implemented the TAXINN procedure and posted invoices in MIRO, FB60, VF01, FB70.
    Where aas we have added few more condition types which is related to the SD service tax in the TAXINN Procedure for posting the invoices in FB70.
    Where as the system gives a message that No posting rules exits in acct key Mess no.FF714 .
    I have already checked the T007a table for the account keys configured and also checked the posting rule for the tax codes.
    Please suggest me how to proceed further.
    Thanks for your cooperation..
    Thanks and Regards.

    Hello Suresh,
    Have you been able to solve that problem...
    I am getting the same problem. KTOSL is empty and have tried lots of debugging to see why it's happening, but did not find anything.
    Kindly let me know if you have been able to solve the problem and how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Parvez

  • Posting rules defined in account key in table T007B

    Hello Expert,
    I am trying to post a document in FB60, however SAP generates below message
    'No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
    Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B'
    I have checked the Rules, Posting keys and Accounts for that Account key in transaction OB40, however the error continues to exist.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Sandip

    Hello,
    I checked FBKP & OBCN and it looks like the settings are correct. Is there any other reason fro this error?
    regards
    Sandip

  • Clearing rule for BRS

    Hi,
    can any one please tell me how BRS happens in SAP, and on which basis documents cleared after the BRS. My intention asking this question is that where we are making the settings for clearing a document. I hope my questiion is clear. Iam expecting step by step explaination.
    Thank& regards
    Shankar chitupolu

    Hi:
           Welcome to SDN..if you are on manual BRS FF67 then following is the procedure to change the clearing rules. BRS gets posted as per setting in clearing rules ..Based on assignment number or reference number BRS gets posted to main account. Hi:
    Please follow as given and hopefully it will help you...
    1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 (based on it data will be entered in assignment field) in Algorithm field , save.
    2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL initials which you are using for outgoing postings..
    In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
    In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
    Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
    Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
    Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post. In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
    Save and post it. Now it should work.
    Regards
    Edited by: Atif Farooq on Oct 9, 2011 6:21 PM

  • Bank statement search string for posting rule 2

    Hello,
    I created a search string (also activated) for clearing sub legder account. Folowing are the combinations i tried:
    1) ###(.| )#######
    2) (^| )###(.| )#######( |$)
    3) ###.#######
    Open document reference text on header normally carries  3digits followed by a dot and then seven digits. For example:
    123.1234567.  I also want to include 123 1234567 (sometimes it appears like this in bank statement) but the system should intrepret it as 123.1234567.
    I think above string acheived this when i did a TEST (button) next mapping screen on the same screen.
    I uploaded the bank statement and then went to another config where you do simulation for a bank statement (uploaded). There the system checks for first three digits only and the document found coloumn is blank (because it checks only first three digits and there are too many probable customers in partner's field).
    Posting rule - algorithm is  no 21
    search string - algorithm is no 21
    mapping field in search string - i tried with bland and without blank (###.#######) it is all same.
    How to make the system check 3+7 digits with dot? and why it checking only first three digits. Can some help?
    BG

    Hi,
    I also would be interested to know this. If anybody can give a step by step analysis, it would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ravi

Maybe you are looking for