Privilege on gV$sql

Hi,
How to grant privilege on gV$sql and gv$session .
I tried granting privilege to v_$session. But I am not able to select on gv$sql.
Thanks.

I am using the grant statement as
grant select on sys.v_$session to bdc;
it gives grant success message
when i try to selecting
select * from v$session ---- successfully selected
select * from gv$session error msg " ora-00942: table or view does not exist.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Reviewing Windows NT Rights and Privileges Granted for SQL Server Service Accounts

Hi Folks,
I am an experienced .NET apps developer who has been tasked with writing a bunch of technical controls for all the SQL Server instances on a domain.
So for the last month I have been diving in the deep end learning Powershell, dba and infrastructure tasks. This is still a work in progress, so be kind to me.. ;o)
So the task I am stuck on is described in the section on 'Reviewing Windows NT Rights and Privileges Granted for SQL Server Service Accounts' http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504(v=sql.105).aspx
I have not been able to find cmdlets that gives me this information. I have found some exes which come frustratingly close like NTRights.exe. This lets me specify a computer name which is great, but only seems to let you set or deny permissions, not just
list them!
Any help with this would be very much appreciated as I am firmly stuck. As per comments above also bear in mind that up until around 1.5 months ago I had never used powershell / knew very much at all about SQL server admin etc. Feeling much more comfortable
with them now, but much less so with Active Directory/ windows permission structures etc so please can I ask anyone kind enough to reply to try and keep the acronyms down as much as humanly possible.. ;o)
Cheers
Kieron

Hi Kieron,
Take a look at this module, it makes permissions much easier to work with than what's currently available:
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/PowerShellAccessControl-d3be7b83
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 13,085+ strong and growing)

ORA-01031: insufficient privileges in PL/SQL but not in SQL

I have problem with following situation.
I switched current schema to another one "ban", and selected 4 rows from "ed"
alter session set current_schema=ban;
SELECT * FROM ed.PS WHERE ROWNUM < 5;
the output is OK, and I get 4 rows like
ID_S ID_Z
1000152 1
1000153 1
1000154 1
1000155 1
but following procedure is compiled with warning
create or replace
procedure proc1
as
rowcnt int;
begin
select count(*) into rowcnt from ed.PS where rownum < 5;
end;
"Create procedure, executed in 0.031 sec."
5,29,PL/SQL: ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
5,2,PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
,,Total execution time 0.047 sec.
Could you help me why SELECT does work in SQL but not in PL/SQL procedure?
Thanks.
Message was edited by:
MattSk

Privs granted via a role are only valid from SQL - and not from/within stored PL/SQL code.
Quoting Tom's (from http://asktom.oracle.com) response to this:I did address this role thing in my book Expert one on one Oracle:
<quote>
What happens when we compile a Definer rights procedure
When we compile the procedure into the database, a couple of things happen with regards to
privileges. We will list them here briefly and then go into more detail:
q    All of the objects the procedure statically accesses (anything not accessed via dynamic SQL)
are verified for existence. Names are resolved via the standard scoping rules as they apply to the
definer of the procedure.
q    All of the objects it accesses are verified to ensure that the required access mode will be
available. That is, if an attempt to UPDATE T is made - Oracle will verify the definer or PUBLIC
has the ability to UPDATE T without use of any ROLES.
q    A dependency between this procedure and the referenced objects is setup and maintained. If
this procedure SELECTS FROM T, then a dependency between T and this procedure is recorded
If, for example, I have a procedure P that attempted to 'SELECT * FROM T', the compiler will first
resolve T into a fully qualified referenced. T is an ambiguous name in the database - there may be
many T's to choose from. Oracle will follow its scoping rules to figure out what T really is, any
synonyms will be resolved to their base objects and the schema name will be associated with the
object as well. It does this name resolution using the rules for the currently logged in user (the
definer). That is, it will look for an object owned by this user called T and use that first (this
includes private synonyms), then it will look at public synonyms and try to find T and so on.
Once it determines exactly what T refers to - Oracle will determine if the mode in which we are
attempting to access T is permitted.   In this case, if we as the definer of the procedure either
owns the object T or has been granted SELECT on T directly or PUBLIC was granted SELECT, the
procedure will compile. If we do not have access to an object called T by a direct grant - the
procedure P will fail compilation. So, when the object (the stored procedure that references T) is
compiled into the database, Oracle will do these checks - and if they "pass", Oracle will compile
the procedure, store the binary code for the procedure and set up a dependency between this
procedure and this object T. This dependency is used to invalidate the procedure later - in the
event something happens to T that necessitates the stored procedures recompilation. For example,
if at a later date - we REVOKE SELECT ON T from the owner of this stored procedure - Oracle will
mark all stored procedures this user has that are dependent on T, that refer to T, as INVALID. If
we ALTER T ADD some column, Oracle can invalidate all of the dependent procedures. This will cause
them to be recompiled automatically upon their next execution.
What is interesting to note is not only what is stored but what is not stored when we compile the
object. Oracle does not store the exact privilege that was used to get access to T. We only know
that procedure P is dependent on T. We do not know if the reason we were allowed to see T was due
to:
q    A grant given to the definer of the procedure (grant select on T to user)
q    A grant to public on T (grant select on T to public)
q    The user having the SELECT ANY TABLE privilege
The reason it is interesting to note what is not stored is that a REVOKE of any of the above will
cause the procedure P to become invalid. If all three privileges were in place when the procedure
was compiled, a revoke of ANY of them will invalidate the procedure - forcing it to be recompiled
before it is executed again. Since all three privileges were in place when we created the procedure
- it will compile successfully (until we revoke all three that is). This recompilation will happen
automatically the next time that the procedure is executed.
Now that the procedure is compiled into the database and the dependencies are all setup, we can
execute the procedure and be assured that it knows what T is and that T is accessible. If something
happens to either the table T or to the set of base privileges available to the definer of this
procedure that might affect our ability to access T -- our procedure will become invalid and will
need to be recompiled.
This leads into why ROLES are not enabled during the compilation and execution of a stored
procedure in Definer rights mode. Oracle is not storing exactly WHY you are allowed to access T -
only that you are. Any change to your privileges that might cause access to T to go away will cause
the procedure to become invalid and necessitate its recompilation. Without roles - that means only
'REVOKE SELECT ANY TABLE' or 'REVOKE SELECT ON T' from the Definer account or from PUBLIC. With
roles - it greatly expands the number of times we would invalidate this procedure. If some role
that was granted to some role that was granted to this user was modified, this procedure might go
invalid, even if we did not rely on that privilege from that role. ROLES are designed to be very
fluid when compared to GRANTS given to users as far as privilege sets go. For a minute, let's say
that roles did give us privileges in stored objects. Now, most any time anything was revoked from
ANY ROLE we had, or any role any role we have has (and so on -- roles can and are granted to roles)
-- many of our objects would become invalid. Think about that, REVOKE some privilege from a ROLE
and suddenly your entire database must be recompiled! Consider the impact of revoking some system
privilege from a ROLE, it would be like doing that to PUBLIC is now, don't do it, just think about
it (if you do revoke some powerful system privilege from PUBLIC, do it on a test database). If
PUBLIC had been granted SELECT ANY TABLE, revoking that privilege would cause virtually every
procedure in the database to go invalid. If procedures relied on roles, virtually every procedure
in the database would constantly become invalid due to small changes in permissions. Since one of
the major benefits of procedures is the 'compile once, run many' model - this would be disastrous
for performance.
Also consider that roles may be
q    Non-default: If I have a non-default role and I enable it and I compile a procedure that
relies on those privileges, when I log out I no longer have that role -- should my procedure become
invalid -- why? Why not? I could easily argue both sides.
q    Password Protected: if someone changes the password on a ROLE, should everything that might
need that role be recompiled? I might be granted that role but not knowing the new password - I
can no longer enable it. Should the privileges still be available? Why or Why not? Again, arguing
either side of this is easy. There are cases for and against each.
The bottom line with respect to roles in procedures with Definer rights are:
q    You have thousands or tens of thousands of end users. They don't create stored objects (they
should not). We need roles to manage these people. Roles are designed for these people (end users).
q    You have far fewer application schema's (things that hold stored objects). For these we want
to be explicit as to exactly what privileges we need and why. In security terms this is called the
concept of 'least privileges', you want to specifically say what privilege you need and why you
need it. If you inherit lots of privileges from roles you cannot do that effectively. We can manage
to be explicit since the number of development schemas is SMALL (but the number of end users is
large)...
q    Having the direct relationship between the definer and the procedure makes for a much more
efficient database. We recompile objects only when we need to, not when we might need to. It is a
large efficiency enhancement.
</quote>

Creating a user with "create user" privilege using PL/SQL?

I have managed to use the PL/SQL DBMS_LDAP package to create and modify OID users (DBMS_LDAP.add_s and DBMS_LDAP.modify_s).
The question is: How can I use DBMS_LDAP to assign privileges to OID users? By "privileges" I mean options like the following (i.e. the options you can enable/disable for any OID user if you login to OIDDAS and click the "privileges" button for a particular user):
Allow user creation
Allow user editing
Allow user deletion
Allow group creation
Allow group editing
Allow group deletion
Allow privilege assignment to users
Allow privilege assignment to groups
Andy

Solution found.
In case anyone comes back to this thread in the future looking to achieve a similar thing: Metalink 205315.1 contains details.

Insufficient privilege when run SQL in PL/SQL Developer

Hi,
My developer had strange behavior when run below SQL from PL/SQL Developer. It will come out with "*Insufficient Privileges*" message.
SELECT Fiscal
FROM pmaps_fiscalweekonly
WHERE intend >= trunc(sysdate)
AND rownum < 5
ORDER BY intend ASC;
Same SQL run without any problem in SQLPLUS and SQL Developer.
But if we use small asc instead capital ASC, it run without problem also in PL/SQL Developer.
SELECT Fiscal
FROM pmaps_fiscalweekonly
WHERE intend >= trunc(sysdate)
AND rownum < 5
ORDER BY intend asc;
Kindly check if someone have any idea.
ZlT

zhilongtan wrote:
But the privilege problem only happened when capital ASC keyword was used in ORDER BY clause. If small asc keyword was used, it run without problem.
It seems to me, it does not relate with privilege or role grant. Please advise. Thanks.
ZlT.I think you should sk this question in a support forum for PL/SQL Developer. The possible bug seems directly connected to this tool. If I remember rightly then this tool is from ALLAutomations. You should ask them. THis forum would be the wrong place to ask.
Edited by: Sven W. on Aug 30, 2010 5:24 PM

Privilege for SQL Access Advisor in OEM

Hi experts,
I tried to enter the option SQL Access Advisor in Oracle enterprise manager as user sh and got the following german error :
Berechtigungsfehler
Sie haben keine ausreichenden Berechtigungen zur Ausführung des SQL Access Advisors. Dazu ist die Rolle OEM_ADVISOR erforderlich. translated to english:
Privileg error
You don't have enough Privilegs to execute SQL Access Advisors. The role OEM_ADVISOR is needed. but the user sh has in my system following roles:
GRANTEE                        GRANTED_ROLE                   ADM DEF
SH                             SELECT_CATALOG_ROLE            NO YES
SH                             OEM_MONITOR                    NO NO
SH                             OEM_ADVISOR                    NO NO     "<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<"
SH                             RESOURCE                       NO YES
SH                             CWM_USER                       NO YESCan anyone help me?
regards
hqt200475

Non-default roles are not enabled "by default".
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/network.112/e16543/authorization.htm#sthref953

Insufficient privilege while using dynamic sql in procedure

Hi,
I am using following script on oracle 10g. and getting unsufficient privs error. please advice.
SQL> show user
User is "GRSADM"
SQL> create or replace procedure grsadm.test_proc as
a varchar2(2000);
begin
a:='CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW
test_view
AS SELECT
''sadf'' a
FROM dual';
execute immediate a;
end;
Procedure created.
SQL> begin
grsadm.test_proc;
end;
begin
grsadm.test_proc;
end;
Error at line 16
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-06512: at "GRSADM.TEST_PROC", line 9
ORA-06512: at line 2
SQL> select * from session_privs
where privilege like '%VIEW%'
PRIVILEGE
CREATE ANY VIEW
DROP ANY VIEW
CREATE ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
ALTER ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
DROP ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
5 rows selected.
Edited by: Ratnesh Sharma on Nov 24, 2011 12:00 PM

yes it has EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE priv.
Following is the list of all the priv this user has.
PRIVILEGE
CREATE ANY SQL PROFILE
DROP ANY SQL PROFILE
GRANT ANY OBJECT PRIVILEGE
DEBUG CONNECT SESSION
RESUMABLE
ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER
ADMINISTER RESOURCE MANAGER
DROP ANY OUTLINE
DROP ANY CONTEXT
CREATE ANY CONTEXT
MANAGE ANY QUEUE
DROP ANY DIMENSION
CREATE ANY DIMENSION
GLOBAL QUERY REWRITE
DROP ANY INDEXTYPE
CREATE ANY INDEXTYPE
DROP ANY OPERATOR
CREATE ANY OPERATOR
DROP ANY LIBRARY
CREATE ANY LIBRARY
EXECUTE ANY TYPE
DROP ANY TYPE
ALTER ANY TYPE
CREATE ANY TYPE
DROP ANY DIRECTORY
CREATE ANY DIRECTORY
DROP ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
ALTER ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
CREATE ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
ANALYZE ANY
DROP PROFILE
CREATE PROFILE
DROP ANY TRIGGER
ALTER ANY TRIGGER
CREATE ANY TRIGGER
EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE
DROP ANY PROCEDURE
ALTER ANY PROCEDURE
CREATE ANY PROCEDURE
CREATE PROCEDURE
AUDIT ANY
DROP ANY ROLE
CREATE ROLE
DROP PUBLIC DATABASE LINK
CREATE PUBLIC DATABASE LINK
CREATE DATABASE LINK
DROP ANY SEQUENCE
CREATE ANY SEQUENCE
DROP ANY VIEW
CREATE ANY VIEW
DROP PUBLIC SYNONYM
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM
DROP ANY SYNONYM
CREATE ANY SYNONYM
DROP ANY INDEX
ALTER ANY INDEX
CREATE ANY INDEX
DROP ANY CLUSTER
CREATE ANY CLUSTER
DELETE ANY TABLE
UPDATE ANY TABLE
INSERT ANY TABLE
SELECT ANY TABLE
COMMENT ANY TABLE
DROP ANY TABLE
ALTER ANY TABLE
CREATE ANY TABLE
DROP ROLLBACK SEGMENT
CREATE ROLLBACK SEGMENT
DROP USER
BECOME USER
CREATE USER
UNLIMITED TABLESPACE
DROP TABLESPACE
ALTER TABLESPACE
CREATE TABLESPACE
CREATE SESSION
ALTER SYSTEM

How to create analytic privileges from sql command line in hana studio?

I want to create a bunch of analytic privileges, activate them and assign it a roles. I was wondering if there is a method where I can create these analytical privileges directly from sql?

Hi Krishna,
Thanks for the reply.
The use case is to create a bulk analytical privileges on the pre-existing analytical or calculation views and I'm failing to create it using the simple CREATE STRUCTURED PRIVILEGE.
The security guide shows below mentioned as the syntax but I'm failing to create it through that:
CREATE STRUCTURED PRIVILEGE AP_SALES_1 FOR SELECT ON TABLEOWNER.VIEW_SALES WHERE REGION IN ('DE','UK') OR PRODUCT = 'CAR';
It gives me this error -
SAP DBTech JDBC: [257] (at 44): sql syntax error: incorrect syntax near "FOR": line 1 col 44 (at pos 44)

ORA-01031: insufficient privileges and shared memory realm does not exist

Hi all,
I came to a dead end to start oracle 10.2 database. I have searched on google and this forum, none of these solutions work for me. PS, I have installed 11g on my machine too.
I have set up ORACLE_SID,ORACLE_HOME to 10.2 database based on the tnsnames.ora.
follow is error message：
sqlplus sys as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Apr 3 02:09:54 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter password:
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
sqlplus /nolog
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Apr 3 02:10:55 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
SQL> conn / as sysdba
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
SQL> conn scott/tiger
ERROR:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
Linux-x86_64 Error: 2: No such file or directory
First I thought the instance has been start yet, but since I can't login with sysdba. I don't know what other options.
For 10.2, the tnsnames.ora
ORA102 =
+(DESCRIPTION =+
+(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST =XXX)(PORT = 1523))+
+(CONNECT_DATA =+
+(SERVER = DEDICATED)+
+(SERVICE_NAME = ora102)+
+)+
+)+
LISTENER_ORA102 =
+(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST =XXX)(PORT = 1523))+
EXTPROC_CONNECTION_DATA =
+(DESCRIPTION =+
+(ADDRESS_LIST =+
+(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC2))+
+)+
+(CONNECT_DATA =+
+(SID = PLSExtProc)+
+(PRESENTATION = RO)+
+)+
+)+
listener.ora:
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = /data/oracle/ora102)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC2))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST =XXXXX)(PORT = 1523))
EXTPROC_CONNECTION_DATA =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = PLSExtProc)
(PRESENTATION = RO)
)

try do this steps on server side:
1) sqlplus sys as sysdba
2) select open_mode from v$database;
show result 2 step

Unable to log in with sysdba privileges

Hi All,
I am not able to connect with sysdba privileges through the sql*plus on the remote machine running on Windows. It gives me the following error :
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL> conn sys@inftmark as sysdba
Enter password: ******
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
Warning: You are no longer connected to ORACLE.
SQL> while my initialization file has following entries:
remote_os_authent = true
remote_login_passwordfile = exclusiveMoreover, i am able to login with user "system" through sql*plus on windows.
My OS : Solaris 64 bit (database running on Solaris machin)
Database : 10.2.0.2
Any idea, what's missing ?

Yogesh,
Did you try adding a new password file? In your pfile location, try this --
1) Remove the existing password (orapw<SID>) file
2) Generate a new password file - orapwd file=orapw<SID> password=<SYS_passwd>
Try reconnecting thru the SQL*Plus client.
- Ravi

Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation error while installing SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise edition on Windows Server 2012 R2 standard VM server

I've been trying fresh installation of SQL Server 2008 R2 enterprise on Windows Server 2012 R2 standard VM server several times for two weeks, but always get the error "Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation". At first, I attempted
to install all features, but failed several times. So I decided to try install just Database Engine service, and still fail at the SqlBrowserConfigAction_Install_ConfigNonRC_Cpu32, with the error "Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation".
I remote login to server with my admin domain account. This account is in server local Administrators group. I
1. Right-click on setup.exe file | properties | Compatibility tab | select compatibility to Windows 8.Then click OK.
2. Right-click on setup.exe file | Run as Administrator, to start the Installation Center.
I have the document of my installation steps and zip file of the installation logs, if you need to take a look.
Appreciate for any help!
ntth

Hi ntth,
"Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation"
The above error is always related to the Windows account SID mapping. I recommend you login into Windows using another Windows account which has administrative privileges and run SQL Server setup using that Windows account.
Besides, please note that we need to apply SQL Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 2 or a later update when installing SQL Server Windows Server 2012 R2. For more information, please review this
KB article.
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Lydia Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Issue with migration DB from SQL Server 2005 to Oracle 11.2 using SQL Developer Migration workbench

Hi,
We face an issue while migrating an SQL Server 2005 DB to Oracle 11.2. It fails during the process. I hope someone on the forum has seen this before and can give us some advice.
I use the latest version of SQL Developer with JRE included (3.2.20.09). The JDBC driver to connect to SQL Server 2005 is 1.2.0
Here are the steps we take in the Migration Workbench wizard:
I made an online extract of the SQL Server database.
Using the workbench in SQL Developer I created a migration repository in schema PDM_MIGRATION.
Next I start the migration, it captures the tables fine, but immediately after the start of the conversion I get a failed message without further explanations.
This is the content of the error xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252" standalone="no"?>
<log>
<record>
<date>2013-08-14T16:23:32</date>
<logger>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.MigrationLogResourceBundle</logger>
<level>SEVERE</level>
<class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.logging.MigrationLogUtil</class>
<message>Ongeldig naampatroon.: PDM_MIGRATION .MIGR_FILTER</message>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.logging.LogInfo@4c12ab</param>
<exception>
    <message>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConvertException: Ongeldig naampatroon.: PDM_MIGRATION .MIGR_FILTER</message>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConverterWorker</class>
      <line>1078</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConverterWorker</class>
      <line>316</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>1002</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>303</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>205</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>159</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.raptor.backgroundTask.RaptorTask</class>
      <line>193</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync</class>
      <line>303</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask</class>
      <line>138</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.raptor.backgroundTask.RaptorTaskManager$RaptorFutureTask</class>
      <line>515</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter</class>
      <line>441</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync</class>
      <line>303</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask</class>
      <line>138</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker</class>
      <line>886</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker</class>
      <line>908</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.lang.Thread</class>
      <line>662</line>
    </frame>
</exception>
</record>
<record>
<date>2013-08-14T16:23:32</date>
<logger>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.MigrationLogResourceBundle</logger>
<level>SEVERE</level>
<class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.logging.MigrationLogUtil</class>
<message>Ongeldig naampatroon.: PDM_MIGRATION .MIGR_FILTER</message>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConverterWorker.copyModel(ConverterWorker.java:1078)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConverterWorker.runConvert(ConverterWorker.java:316)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask.doConvert(FullMigrateTask.java:1002)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask.doMaskBasedActions(FullMigrateTask.java:303)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask.doWork(FullMigrateTask.java:205)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask.doWork(FullMigrateTask.java:159)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.raptor.backgroundTask.RaptorTask.call(RaptorTask.java:193)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.raptor.backgroundTask.RaptorTaskManager$RaptorFutureTask.run(RaptorTaskManager.java:515)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)</param>
<param>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)</param>
<param>java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)</param>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.logging.LogInfo@5dc1bc</param>
<exception>
    <message>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConvertException: Ongeldig naampatroon.: PDM_MIGRATION .MIGR_FILTER</message>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConverterWorker</class>
      <line>1078</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.convert.ConverterWorker</class>
      <line>316</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>1002</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>303</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>205</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
      <line>159</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.raptor.backgroundTask.RaptorTask</class>
      <line>193</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync</class>
      <line>303</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask</class>
      <line>138</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>oracle.dbtools.raptor.backgroundTask.RaptorTaskManager$RaptorFutureTask</class>
      <line>515</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter</class>
      <line>441</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync</class>
      <line>303</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.FutureTask</class>
      <line>138</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker</class>
      <line>886</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker</class>
      <line>908</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <class>java.lang.Thread</class>
      <line>662</line>
    </frame>
</exception>
</record>
<record>
<date>2013-08-14T16:23:32</date>
<logger>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.MigrationLogResourceBundle</logger>
<level>WARNING</level>
<class>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.ui.FullMigrateTask</class>
<message>Building converted model: FAILED : Database Migration : FAILED</message>
<param>oracle.dbtools.migration.workbench.core.logging.LogInfo@15a3779</param>
</record>
Does anybody know what this error means and what steps we should take to continue the migration?
I see the PDM_MIGRATION.MIGR_FILTER is a type.
Many thanks in advance,
Kris

Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for your reply.
This is how the type MIGR_FILTER looks like:
create or replace
TYPE MIGR_FILTER IS OBJECT (
FILTER_TYPE INTEGER, -- Filter Types are 0-> ALL, 1->NAMELIST, 2->WHERE CLAUSE, 3->OBJECTID LIST
OBJTYPE VARCHAR2(40),
OBJECTIDS OBJECTIDLIST,
NAMES NAMELIST,
WHERECLAUSE VARCHAR2(1000));
I think the repository user has the correct privileges. This is the overview of privileges it has:
SQL> select * from dba_sys_privs where GRANTEE in ('PDM_MIGRATION') order by GRANTEE;
GRANTEE PRIVILEGE ADM
PDM_MIGRATION ALTER SESSION NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE CLUSTER NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE DATABASE LINK NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE PROCEDURE NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE SEQUENCE NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE SESSION NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE SYNONYM NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE TABLE NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE TRIGGER NO
PDM_MIGRATION CREATE VIEW NO
PDM_MIGRATION UNLIMITED TABLESPACE NO
SQL> select * from dba_role_privs where GRANTEE in ('PDM_MIGRATION') order by GRANTEE;
GRANTEE GRANTED_ROLE ADM DEF
PDM_MIGRATION CONNECT NO YES
PDM_MIGRATION RESOURCE NO YES
Best regards,
Kris

Grant privileges and permission to user, to create user and database in 10g

Hi,
I'm very much new to Oracle 10g database and after all my search, I think this forum will help me to solve my puzzle. Installed Oracle 10g database and during installation created a Global database "TestDB". I created an user "user1" in sqlplusw, by logging in as system.
Now I need to know, what privileges and permissions should be given to this "user1", so that I can create new users and create database by logging as "user1". I don't want to Inherit all the sytem privileges of SYSTEM or SYSDBA or SYS or SYSOPER.
Is there a way where I could achieve this by explicitly granting the required privileges and permissions

You may need to know all the views to get the privilege information.
SQL> conn /as sysdba
SQL> select table_name from dict where table_name like '%PRIV%';
And also, take a look into below Oracle Documentations.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_9013.htm#SQLRF01603
Regards,
Sabdar Syed.

SCOM 2012 R2 installtion wizard not able to contact SQL server cluster

Hi,
This is about the error faced while installing SCOM 2012 R2.
My customer has SQL 2012 SP1 cluster installed. I am trying to install the SCOM 2012 R2 with this installed SQL cluster. The SQL cluster is installed with default instance and with AAG (Always on Availability Group).
The edition of SQL server is, SQL Server Enterprise edition with SP1
After check services on both the SQL nodes found that SQL Full text is not installed (as the related SQL Full text service not present in the services.msc) on any of the SQL cluster node & SQL Browser service is not running.
The running services for SQL are, SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER) & SQL Server Agent (MSSQLSERVER).
When I started to install the SCOM 2012 R2, Within a SCOM 2012 wizard, On the Configure the Operational Database screen, entered only the name of SQL cluster & no instance as it is with default instance MSSQLSERVER.
I faced error as, This SQL Server could not be found.
After installed SQL full text, the service is showing in services.msc as "SQL Full-text Filter Daemon Launcher (MSSQLSERVER)".
Now when I started to install the SCOM 2012 R2, Within a SCOM 2012 wizard, On the Configure the Operational Database screen, entered only the name of SQL cluster & no instance as it is with default instance MSSQLSERVER.
I faced error as, The installed version of SQL Server could not be verified or is not supported.
Followings test carried out for the connectivity between SCOM 2012 MS &SQL Cluster
Ping SQL Cluster successfully
Telnet SQL Cluster for port 1433 successfully
Tracert SQL Cluster – completed successfully with single hops.
The windows firewall is off on both sides
The SQL services running on the Active node 1 of the cluster are as follows:
SQL Full Text Filter Daemon Launcher (MSSQLSERVER) -- Running & Manual
SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER) -- Running & Automatic
SQL Server Agent (MSSQLSERVER) -- Running & Automatic
SQL serve Browser - Stopped & Manual
SQL Server VSS Writer -- Running & Automatic
The SQL services running on the Passive node 2 of the cluster are as follows:
SQL Full Text Filter Daemon Launcher (MSSQLSERVER) -- Running & Manual
SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER) -- Running & Automatic
SQL Server Agent (MSSQLSERVER) -- Stopped & Automatic
SQL serve Browser - Stopped & Manual
SQL Server VSS Writer -- Running & Automatic
The SQL Server Agent (MSSQLSERVER) service is not running on the second node. It is running only on first node which is active.
The account used to install SCOM has the local admin privilege on the SQL server
To ping the cluster use the cluster name & it solved the whole FQDN of cluster in ping result. When ping with IP address with -a it not resolve to name.
Is any one can provide their valuable inputs.
Regards,
SandeepK

Hi SandeepK,
Before Installing Operations Manager on an availability group, please
1. Make sure to use the Group listener Name and port when installing Operations Manager for the databases that are going to be added to the availability databases.
2. The first management server will use the Group listener to get the primary SQL instance, and will install the databases on that instance.
System Requirements: System Center 2012 R2 Operations Manager
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn249696.aspx#BKMK_ClusterConfig
Niki Han
TechNet Community Support

Tuning a sql using tkprof

The most important query in our application is:
SELECT
      COUNT ( * )
FROM            I_JOURNAL m
               INNER JOIN
                  LIU_TYPES lt
               ON (m.LIU_TYPE = lt.LIU_TYPE)
            INNER JOIN
               LAWFUL_I li
            ON (m.LIID = li.LIID)
         LEFT OUTER JOIN
            PHONE_BOOK pb
         ON (    m.NORM_CIN = pb.NORM_CIN
             AND pb.DELETION_DATE IS NULL
             AND pb.OPERATOR_ID = :"SYS_B_00")
WHERE   LIU_PRIORITY >= :"SYS_B_01"
         AND (li.ID IN
                    (:"SYS_B_02",
                     :"SYS_B_03",
                     :"SYS_B_04",
                     :"SYS_B_05",
                     :"SYS_B_06",
                     :"SYS_B_07",
                     :"SYS_B_08",
                     :"SYS_B_09",
                     :"SYS_B_59",
                     :"SYS_B_60",
                     :"SYS_B_61",
                     :"SYS_B_62"))
         AND (li.END_VALID_DATE IS NULL
              OR m.DISPLAY_DATE <= li.END_VALID_DATE)
         AND li.OPERATOR_ID = :"SYS_B_63"It should be fast: response time less than 5 seconds.
But in some sites, the number of records of the tables is big:
- I_JOURNAL: 5000000 rows
- LAWFUL_I: 1000 rows
- phone_book: 78000 rows
The worst case we have is when the operator_id is related to a lot of rows in I_JOURNAL, for example 800000.
In that case the response time is 20 seconds.
I've traced the query and the output of tkprof is:
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.05       0.04          0          0          0           0
Fetch        2    105.00     102.69     283093     652774          0           1
total        4    105.05     102.73     283093     652774          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 50
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=652774 pr=283093 pw=0 time=102690302 us)
888030   HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=652774 pr=283093 pw=0 time=99929786 us)
28488    INDEX RANGE SCAN OBJ#(45035) (cr=130 pr=0 pw=0 time=142564 us)(object id 45035)
888030    HASH JOIN (cr=652644 pr=283093 pw=0 time=85254971 us)
     15     TABLE ACCESS FULL OBJ#(44893) (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=320 us)
888117     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OBJ#(47625) (cr=652637 pr=283093 pw=0 time=63945559 us)
888179      NESTED LOOPS (cr=5389 pr=4986 pw=0 time=23801052 us)
     61       INLIST ITERATOR (cr=213 pr=1 pw=0 time=8299 us)
     61        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OBJ#(44860) (cr=213 pr=1 pw=0 time=7235 us)
     61         INDEX RANGE SCAN OBJ#(45023) (cr=122 pr=0 pw=0 time=2454 us)(object id 45023)
888117       INDEX RANGE SCAN OBJ#(52001) (cr=5176 pr=4985 pw=0 time=9904545 us)(object id 52001)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
db file sequential read                    283093        0.02          8.51
SQL*Net message from client                     2        0.00          0.00
********************************************************************************First question: I cannot understand why the fetch count is *2*.
Second question: could you give me any suggestions to reduce the response time?
Another question: the cardinality seems wrong:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 28,44 Bytes: 130 Cardinality: 1
     11 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 130 Cardinality: 1
          10 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 28,44 Bytes: 3.878.940 Cardinality: 29,838
               1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PBK_GET_NORM_CIN_UK Cost: 131 Bytes: 585,051 Cardinality: 25,437
               9 HASH JOIN Cost: 28,4 Bytes: 3.192.666 Cardinality: 29,838
                    2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE LIU_TYPES Cost: 3 Bytes: 160 Cardinality: 16
                    8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE I_JOURNAL Cost: 1,092 Bytes: 58,6 Cardinality: 1,172
                         7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 28,396 Bytes: 2.973.923 Cardinality: 30,659
                              5 INLIST ITERATOR
                                   4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE LAWFUL_I Cost: 11 Bytes: 1,222 Cardinality: 26
                                        3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) MITO.LIN_ID_UK Cost: 2 Cardinality: 61
                              6 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX IJL_LIN_FK_IX Cost: 30 Cardinality: 5,318 The result of the query is 890403 and in the explain plan you can see *"Cardinality: 29,838"*
Edited by: user600979 on 11-mar-2010 2.27

The explain plan without the hint FULL is
15:08:15 SQL> 15:08:15 SQL> select plan_table_output from TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(NULL,NULL,'TYPICAL'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID ffyv1wufuu12v, child number 0
User has no SELECT privileges on V$SQL
Plan hash value: 4183643102
| Id | Operation                         | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                  |                       |       |       | 28440 (100)|          |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                   |                       |     1 |   130 |            |          |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER           |                       | 29838 | 3788K| 28440   (1)| 00:05:42 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN               | PBK_GET_NORM_CIN_UK   | 25437 |   571K|   130   (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 4 |    HASH JOIN                      |                       | 29838 | 3117K| 28399   (1)| 00:05:41 |
|* 5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL             | LIU_TYPES             |    16 |   160 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID   | I_JOURNAL             | 1172 | 58600 | 1091   (0)| 00:00:14 |
|   7 |      NESTED LOOPS                 |                       | 30659 | 2904K| 28396   (1)| 00:05:41 |
|   8 |       INLIST ITERATOR             |                       |       |       |            |          |
|* 9 |        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| LAWFUL_I              |    26 | 1222 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN          | LIN_ID_UK             |    61 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IJL_LIN_FK_IX         | 5318 |       |    30   (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("M"."NORM_CIN"="PB"."NORM_CIN")
   3 - access("PB"."OPERATOR_ID"=:SYS_B_00 AND "PB"."DELETION_DATE" IS NULL)
       filter("PB"."DELETION_DATE" IS NULL)
   4 - access("M"."LIU_TYPE"="LT"."LIU_TYPE")
   5 - filter("LT"."LIU_PRIORITY">=:SYS_B_01)
   6 - filter(("LI"."END_VALID_DATE" IS NULL OR "M"."DISPLAY_DATE"<="LI"."END_VALID_DATE"))
   9 - filter("LI"."OPERATOR_ID"=:SYS_B_63)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
10 - access(("LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_02 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_03 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_04 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_05 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_06 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_07 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_08 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_09 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_10 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_11 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_12 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_13 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_14 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_15 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_16 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_17 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_18 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_19 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_20 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_21 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_22 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_23 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_24 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_25 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_26 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_27 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_28 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_29 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_30 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_31 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_32 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_33 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_34 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_35 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_36 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_37 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_38 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_39 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_40 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_41 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_42 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_43 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_44 OR
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_45 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_46 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_47 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_48 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_49 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_50 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_51 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_52 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_53 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_54 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_55 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_56 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_57 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_58 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_59 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_60 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_61 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_62))
11 - access("M"."LIID"="LI"."LIID")----
The outpout with the FULL hint is:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 5ksz9j3cdqnjc, child number 0
User has no SELECT privileges on V$SQL
Plan hash value: 3482366683
| Id | Operation                        | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                 |                       |       |       | 57737 (100)|          |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                  |                       |     1 |   130 |            |          |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER          |                       | 29838 | 3788K| 57737   (1)| 00:11:33 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | PBK_GET_NORM_CIN_UK   | 25437 |   571K|   130   (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 4 |    HASH JOIN                     |                       | 29838 | 3117K| 57697   (1)| 00:11:33 |
|* 5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL            | LIU_TYPES             |    16 |   160 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     HASH JOIN                    |                       | 30659 | 2904K| 57693   (1)| 00:11:33 |
|   7 |      INLIST ITERATOR             |                       |       |       |            |          |
|* 8 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| LAWFUL_I              |    26 | 1222 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN          | LIN_ID_UK             |    61 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL           | I_JOURNAL             | 4998K|   238M| 57640   (1)| 00:11:32 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("M"."NORM_CIN"="PB"."NORM_CIN")
   3 - access("PB"."OPERATOR_ID"=:SYS_B_00 AND "PB"."DELETION_DATE" IS NULL)
       filter("PB"."DELETION_DATE" IS NULL)
   4 - access("M"."LIU_TYPE"="LT"."LIU_TYPE")
   5 - filter("LT"."LIU_PRIORITY">=:SYS_B_01)
   6 - access("M"."LIID"="LI"."LIID")
       filter(("LI"."END_VALID_DATE" IS NULL OR "M"."DISPLAY_DATE"<="LI"."END_VALID_DATE"))
   8 - filter("LI"."OPERATOR_ID"=:SYS_B_63)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   9 - access(("LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_02 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_03 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_04 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_05 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_06 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_07 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_08 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_09 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_10 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_11 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_12 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_13 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_14 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_15 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_16 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_17 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_18 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_19 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_20 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_21 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_22 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_23 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_24 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_25 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_26 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_27 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_28 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_29 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_30 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_31 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_32 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_33 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_34 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_35 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_36 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_37 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_38 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_39 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_40 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_41 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_42 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_43 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_44 OR
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_45 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_46 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_47 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_48 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_49 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_50 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_51 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_52 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_53 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_54 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_55 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_56 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_57 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_58 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_59 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_60 OR
              "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_61 OR "LI"."ID"=:SYS_B_62))

Privilege on gV$sql

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for