Problem in 1KEK transaction

Hi All,
I have a requirement to create a BDC recording for tcode 1KEK -Profit Center Accounting..
I created a BDC recording for the tcode and it is working fine for first time.
Problem is that first screen we need to provide controlling area ,even thought I m calling that screen in my BDC it is not calling when I execute the progrm second time in same login.
So I want to know whether BDC recording is possible for 1KEK .
Thanks & Regards,
Sneha

Hi Alvaro,
Thanks a lot for your solution..
I got a solution for this problem.I tried running the program of 1KEK i. e RCOPCA49 by giving inputs.It worked for me.
Thanks again,
Regards,
Sneha

Similar Messages

Problem in loading transactional data from to 0MKT_DSO1(ods) to 0MKTG_C01

Hi,
I am trying to load lead transaction data to the standard Crm lead management cube from ODS.There is a problem while loading transaction data from 0MKT_DSO1(ods) to the infocube 0MKTG_C01 as the field 0STATECSYS2(CRM STATUS) is set to 10 in ods -meaning incorrect transaction. This feild is not there in the infocube.
There is a routine in the cube that deletes data records with (0statecsys2) set to 10.
THIS field is not coming in the transaction.
so, where can i see the master data in crm source system? and why is that feild getting set to 10 ?
thanks in advance!

Thanks for the reply..
I have checked the Fact table which shows
1. packet Dimension
2. Time dimension
3. Unit dimension.
I have kept the 0CALDAY as the time characteristics.
Sample data i have loaded from ODS to Cube.
Sample data in ODS.
Sales order No_____0CALDAY_____AMOUNT
800001___________12/02/2009____15
I have loaded this data in Cube with Full Upload.
Data in Cube.
Sales order No_____0CALDAY_____AMOUNT
800001___________12/02/2009____15
Again i am loading the same data to cube
Data in cube after loading.
Sales order No_____0CALDAY_____AMOUNT
800001___________12/02/2009____15
800001___________12/02/2009____15
The data is duplicated and it is not cumulating.
Am i missing anything on this.
Pls help..
Thanks,
Siva.

I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82

Hi experts,
I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82, when I try to assign a team in the tab "EventLocation", the transaction sends me the message "Equipment not available at the functional location".
I previously reviewed the equipment is assigned to the transaction IL03.
No authorization errors, I checked with the transaction SU53.
Any idea to solve this problem?
I appreciate it.

Hello,
I happened to again see this post where question is yet to be answered.
As per SAP standard design, only those equipment would be allowed which are directly installed on the functional location. What this means is that those equipment which are not directly assigned to the functional location (might be assigned to another superior equipment which in turn is assigned to the functional location) can't be saved.
Now, I am not sure why SAP has kept it like this when the same is allowed in notification.
Can somebody clarify the business relevance of this standard behavior??
Regards,
Pavan

My apple ID was hacked and a game by GodGame Inc was bought and installed. When I try to report a problem about this transaction, the link automatically sends me to the apple store support. The application is bugged. Please help.

My apple ID was hacked and a game by GodGame Inc was bought and installed. When I try to report a problem about this transaction, the link automatically sends me to the apple store support. The application is bugged. Please help.

thanks for your response roaminggnome. I changed my password immediately after it happened and I have contacted i tunes to let them know of this dillemma.
The I-tunes credit was a promotional thing by Apple to buy their laptop. So I didn't pay for the i-tunes credit in the first place. Do you think my bank will be able to reinburse Itunes credit then? I will ask support when they get back to me.

Problem in Distributed transaction with Oracle 8.1.7 and Weblogic 7.0

          Hi,
          I am using two unmanaged weblogic 7.0 servers and oracle 8.1.7 enterprise edition.
          I am using oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSource for creating connection pool
          in weblogic. The pool gets created fine but when connection it is getting used
          it throws up following error.
          java.sql.SQLException: ORA-02044: transaction manager login denied: transaction
          in progress
          ORA-06512: at "SYS.JAVA_XA", line 0
          ORA-06512: at line 1
          at oracle.jdbc.dbaccess.DBError.throwSqlException(DBError.java:168)
          at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTIoer.processError(TTIoer.java:208)
          at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.Oall7.receive(Oall7.java:543)
          at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.doOall7(TTC7Protocol.java:1405)
          at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.parseExecuteFetch(TTC7Protocol.java:822)
          at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.executeNonQuery(OracleStatement.java:1446)
          at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteOther(OracleStatement.java:1371)
          at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1900)
          at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:363)
          at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.execute(OraclePreparedStatement.java:407)
          at oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXAResource.start(OracleXAResource.java:171)
          at weblogic.jdbc.jta.VendorXAResource.start(VendorXAResource.java:41)
          at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.start(DataSource.java:569)
          I don't know what is causing this problem.Please send me the pointers.
          Regards,
          Vikash


ID is a NUMBER and id.toString() is not a number, for
example it ca be a null reference.
well we tryed also this version :
ps.setLong(1, id.longValue());
moreover the exception wasn't thrown for the value of id :56 but was thrown for the value of id : 88. Hence I think it is a case of something other than my code.
michal

Performance problem for mass transactions after upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6.0

Hi All,
After upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 (IS-U), mass transactions such as FPY1, FPVA, FP04M are taking very long time to complete. for example, before upgrade the jobs sceduled for FPVA transaction take around 5k-6k seconds. Whereas after upgrade the jobs for FPVA with the same variant takes around 9k-10k seconds. I am unable to figure out the cause for exponential increase in the duration of several mass-jobs (after the upgrade). Are there any SAP notes or do we need to do any customizing setting to solve this problem? Does anyone face this kind of problem?
Thanks in advance
Taj

Hi,
This is normal after upgrade to 6.0, I have faced the same in all upgrades I've done and some others that I have involved also. If you did not requests and going live upgrade check I strongly recomend to schedule an Early Watch Check to minimize the impact. Times won´t be the same but can be very close if the system is tuned well. We have tuned systems that now run with good performance after this services.

Problem in a transaction after upgrade

Hi ,
I am getting a problem in transaction after upgrade.
I am getting like "Too Many sctions" in a Tab. Its a custom tab in a standard transaction.
But its working fine before upgrade.
Could you please suggest me, what can I do for this.
some more info.
Errors: Dynpro genearation for this scrn has errors.
call tcode SLG1 for object BDT_Dynpro_generate.
And in SLG1 I am getting like this
"Object RERO screen RERO03: too many sctions."
Regards,
sarath

Well if you are willing to invest money, even SAP will help you out, but i guess thats not what you are after :).
The message "too many sections" is quite telling so i suppose you have too much of "something" on that subscreen.
To more preciseley define what "something" may be you could do a where used on MESSAGE 03 of messagle class RERO.
Or try to debug it and set a breakpoint at statement MESSAGE.
This way you should be able to find out of WHAT exactky you have too much. When this is done you probably can think yourself of a way to overcome this.

Problem with CALL TRANSACTION 'VA33' with PARAMETER ID 'AUN'

I started to post this as a problem, but stumbled into the solution while testing further. Since I didn't find a solution in the SDN.SAP Forums I'm entering this to help others who may have the same problem.
This code would not work:
      SET PARAMETER ID 'AUN' FIELD sy-lisel(10).   "sy-lisel(10) contains the Scheduling Agreement on the selected line of the report.
      CALL TRANSACTION 'VA33' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
It would go to Transaction VA33 but would always default to the last Scheduling Agreement accessed manually instead of the one I needed to see via this call.
When I change the transaction to VA03 it works:
      SET PARAMETER ID 'AUN' FIELD sy-lisel(10).
      CALL TRANSACTION 'VA03' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
We can not access a Scheduling Agreement from VA03 on-line, but for some reason this call displays the correct S/A, and System Status says it is running transactin VA03.
Perhaps it is because we are using a custome Order Type for Scheduling Agreements (YALZ)?
Best wishes to our SAP friends.

Hi,
VA33 is for schedulinng Agreement so use..
SET PARAMETER ID 'LPN' FIELD sy-lisel(10).
AUN - Order number
LPN - Scheduling agreement number
now it works..
Regards,
Sathish Reddy.

Problem with call transaction and a query

Hi,
Whe have a query that has its own Z tcode, we are working with this "EXIT_SAPLCORF_103" within the tcode CO11N. Inside the include "ZXCOFU13" we call the query Tcode and it is displayed on screen but with no data.
The table "itbdcdata" record well the data of the inputs in the query recording so you can see with the WERKS and the number of reserve (3994) in the recording.
Why the call transaction display the query screen with no data...? and how can i pass the inputs to the query screen so it be executed.
Thanks on advance.
David Fúnez
Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
This is the recording:
AQZZZ_USER_GRMA=Z_QUERY_PP_003     1000X                                                                                BDC_CURSOR     SP$00002-LOW
                                                            BDC_OKCODE     =CRET
                                                            S_WERKS-LOW     1202
                                                            SP$00002-LOW           3994
                                                            %ALV     X
this is the code in the INCLUDE
*& Include           ZXCOFU13
DATA: itbdcdata TYPE bdcdata    OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
      optoption TYPE ctu_params.
REFRESH itbdcdata.
CLEAR   itbdcdata.
itbdcdata-program = 'AQZZZ_USER_GRMA=Z_QUERY_PP_003'.
itbdcdata-dynpro   = '1000'.
itbdcdata-dynbegin = 'X'.
APPEND itbdcdata.
itbdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_CURSOR'.
itbdcdata-fval = 'SP$00002-LOW'.
APPEND itbdcdata.
itbdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_OKCODE'.
itbdcdata-fval = '=CRET'.
APPEND itbdcdata.
itbdcdata-fnam = 'S_WERKS-LOW'.
itbdcdata-fval = '1202'.
APPEND itbdcdata.
itbdcdata-fnam = 'SP$00002-LOW'.
itbdcdata-fval = caufvd_imp-rsnum.
APPEND itbdcdata.
itbdcdata-fnam = '%ALV'.
itbdcdata-fval = 'X'.
APPEND itbdcdata.
CLEAR optoption.
optoption-dismode = 'A'. "A is visible
optoption-updmode = 'S'.
CALL TRANSACTION 'ZRESV' USING itbdcdata OPTIONS FROM optoption.

problem solved.

Problem with Call Transaction

hello,
i am doing call transaction to ME41 in mode 'A' (visible). The problem is when it go to screen SAPLMLSP 0200, in this screen stop call transaction, no error, no okcode, no data,..why?
thanks,
regards,

Hi,
Please check your BDC Program. i think you are not done the recording for that screen. Pleae do the recording one more time and check the program.
Thanks,
Venkat

Problem with CALL Transaction syntax

Hi All,
I have created a report in which Im displaying Sales order, planned order n production order details.
In the output if the user double clicks, anyone of the sales order/planned order/production order no, it has to take to concern transaction.
Sales order and planned order are perfectly working.
problem is with production order, it is not displaying, the exact order no.
my code:
WHEN '&IC1'.
      IF rs_selfield-fieldname = 'VBELN'.
     READ TABLE gt_final_so INTO wa_final_so INDEX rs_selfield-tabindex
        SET PARAMETER ID 'AUN' FIELD wa_final_so-vbeln.
        CALL TRANSACTION 'VA03' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
      ELSEIF rs_selfield-fieldname = 'PLNUM'.
     READ TABLE gt_final_so INTO wa_final_so INDEX rs_selfield-tabindex.
        SET PARAMETER ID 'PAF' FIELD wa_final_so-plnum.
        CALL TRANSACTION 'MD13' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
      ELSEIF rs_selfield-fieldname = 'AUFNR'.
     READ TABLE gt_final_so INTO wa_final_so INDEX rs_selfield-tabindex.
        SET PARAMETER ID 'ANR' FIELD wa_final_so-aufnr.
        CALL TRANSACTION 'COR3' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
In debugging I checked, after call transaction, the system executing the following code, here CAUFVD-AUFNR is initial.
So, it has been picking some different no.
      Starten Batchrezept über Einsatzplanung - DO-THANH
MODULE GET_PARAMETER OUTPUT.
    IF CAUFVD-AUFNR IS INITIAL.
      GET PARAMETER ID 'BR1' FIELD *CAUFVD-AUFNR.
      IF NOT *CAUFVD-AUFNR IS INITIAL.
        CAUFVD-AUFNR = *CAUFVD-AUFNR.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDMODULE.                             " GET_PARAMETER OUTPUT
Pls help me how to resolve the above problem.
Valuable suggesstion will be highly appreciated.
regards,
Priya

Hi,
Note that the code as different Parameter id
you are setting the parameter 'ANR'
SET PARAMETER ID 'ANR' FIELD wa_final_so-aufnr.
Where as in that method it is reading the parameter id 'BR1'
GET PARAMETER ID 'BR1' FIELD *CAUFVD-AUFNR.
so try by setting the 'BR1' in set parameter.
ELSEIF rs_selfield-fieldname = 'AUFNR'.
     READ TABLE gt_final_so INTO wa_final_so INDEX rs_selfield-tabindex.
        SET PARAMETER ID 'BR1' FIELD wa_final_so-aufnr.
        CALL TRANSACTION 'COR3' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
Regards,
Kiruba.

Problem with "Call Transaction" which calls a view cluster

Hi Colleagues ,
I have a rare issue with the call transaction , here is the use case for it :
1> I call a transaction(calls a screen X) in a report ,
2> I have a button in the screen , which calls another transaction(calls a screen X2) .
3> On the screen X2 i have another button which calls transaction (calls the view cluster ).
problem :
i'm not able to see the navigation pane in the view cluster on the left. its missing .
but when the view cluster is called direclty , i'm able to see the navigation pane in the view cluster ..
My initial doubt was , is this the problem with nesting of 'Call Transaction' calls ????
please answer the thread , i have to fix this ASAP.
regards,
Dilip

problem solved.

Problem with Call Transaction opt-RACOMMIT = 'X'.

Hello Experts
I am having a problem with call transction. I am calling a Z transaction in function module. Within the Z transaction I am furhter calling some function modules and doing commit work and then some more processing after the comit work inside So to make sure the code after comit work is fired I am using opt-RACOMMIT = 'X' in call transaction. Whenever I set this parameter opt-RACOMMIT = 'X' call transaction fails and gives error saying No batch Input data for screen XXXX. However the Z tcode processed succesfully.
By changing the Mode to E i found that it remians at the last screen of call transction after executing the Z transaction and never comes back
But if I donot use RACOMMIT = 'X' everything is fine. Please let me know if anyone came across such problem. Any help will be apreciated.
Thanks,
kamal

Hello,
as you said, if there is more than commit statement in your ztransaction, then you should put RACOMMIT to 'X'.
I think the problem is in your bdcdata: change it to be sure to get back to the 1st screen of your ztransaction. Then, at this point (1st screen) hit "back" button.
Cordialement,
Chaouki

Problem with Call transaction method in function module

Dear Frndz,
           I am converting its services into webdynpro.
           I developed a rfc[function module] for travel management [TRIP] . In that rfc i used call transaction method[BDC] to upload the data. The same rfc will be called from the frontend[portal].It is working fine in development for whome se37 execution authorization was assigned. It is not working for other users. I hope it is something relevant to authorization .If suppose can i create a authorization object for this rfc and assign it to the profile.
        Normally users can be given authorization to run the tcode.
similarly i want to give the authorization to be given users to execuste this funtion module.
huv can i do it ?? any suggestion.
Rgds.
siva

Use ST01 transaction to start authorization trace, you will then see what authorizations are missing (if your assumption is right of course, i.e. if it's really an authorization problem)

Commit work statement creating problem in CALL TRANSACTION

Hi Friends,
we are facing a problem where we need to call a standard program from a Zprogram.
we have tried the following ways.
1. Using SUBMIT statement , we are sending the parameters to the standard program, but when the standard program gives a
    dump our program cannot process further records. we are calling the submit statment in a loop. As because the standard
    program is giving dump our program is not able to process the next record in the loop and this should not be the case.
    To avoid this we have used the second method.
2. we used a CALL transaction, we have created a Tcode for the standard program and called this transaction in the calling
    program. We are passing the parameters for the standard program via BDC table. this works fine even when the standard
    program gives a dump but when ever the control   comes across a Commit work statement the the control comes back to our
   calling program with out executing the rest of the   statments after the commit.
now our concern is even though there is an commit work statement , statements after the commit work should also get executed in call transaction. Is thee any way?
Regards,
Sravan

Hi All,
I got the solution
DATA: ctu_parameters TYPE ctu_params.
ctu_parameters-dismode = 'E'.
ctu_parameters-updmode = 'A'.
ctu_parameters-racommit = 'X'. "No abortion by COMMIT WORK
CALL TRANSACTION USING itab_bdcdata OPTIONS FROM ctu_parameters.
the above code will work even if there is an commit work . This might help some others.

Problem in 1KEK transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for