Problem in creating new versions for existing DIR using CV01N

I am working in SAP ERP 6.0 EHP 4.0 system.
I have problem in creating new versions for existing DIR using CV01N
I create a DIR version 00 with functional location and mpd cycles. Then when i try to create a new version by copying the contents created from already created document.I change the MPD cycles in the new version and save it.
once when i display the first document created the mpdcycle specified in version 01 is copied to the 00 version.
The document is inconsistent where versioning of document doesnot work properly wrt MPDCYCLE and MP HEADER.
The problem which i found was the document identification guid remains the same for all the document versions getting created.
The same is working fine in SAP ERP6.0 EHP3.0 sytem.
Please someone help me in resolving the above issue.
Regards,
Prasad.B

There is a change in the standard code.The reason for the above problem was  because of a missing Enhancemnet point in a standard function module 'CV110_DOC_CREATE_WITH_TEMPLATE'.
IS-ADEC-MPD  - Enhancement to copy MPD data
ENHANCEMENT-POINT CV110_DOC_CREATE_WTEMPL_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLCV110.
+*$*$-Start: CV110_DOC_CREATE_WTEMPL_01----------------------------------------------------------$*$*+
+**ENHANCEMENT 1  ZSF_AD_MPD_SAPLCV110.    "active version**+
+*** copy MPD relevant data from templ. doc to current doc**+
  +**CALL FUNCTION 'MPD02_COPY_MPD_DATA'**+
    +**EXPORTING**+
      +**is_draw = ls_draw**+
    +**TABLES**+
      +**ct_drad = lt_drad.**+
+*ENDENHANCEMENT.**$*$-End:   CV110_DOC_CREATE_WTEMPL_01----------------------------------------------------------$*$*+
Created a custom enhancement point similar to SAP ECC6.0 EHP 3.0 system.
The reason was the buffer was not getting cleared previously.After inserting the above code the DIR's are getting created withot any issues.
Regards,
Prasad.B

Similar Messages

  • How to create new version for material

    Hi expert,
    Can anyone please guide me step by step on how to create new version for material and vendor? Please also mention transaction and details step by step.
    Thanks

    HI,
    Do you mean to have version management for purchasing documents?.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • Create new mailbox for existing users?

    Hi All,
    I am new to JNDI concepts. I need to create new mailbox for existing users in domino directory. is it possible?
    Scenario is : I have some users in domino directory. They dont have mail account now. I want to create it.
    Kindly guide me...
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi,
    You can try LSMW (Direct method) for uploading class values.
    Upload file can hae following structure:
    OBJEK     |     ATINN     |     KLART     |     ATWRT
    Release Grou+Release strategy |     Characteristic name     |     Class type     |     Class Value
    e.g. rel grp is PO, rel strategy is 01, characteristic name is EBAN_EKORG, and class value is 1000 then
    OBJEK     |     ATINN     |     KLART     |     ATWRT
    PO01     |     EBAN_EKORG |     032     |     1000
    multiple characterstics can be
    OBJEK     |     ATINN     |     KLART     |     ATWRT
    PO01     |     EBAN_EKORG |     032     |     1000
    PO01     |     EBAN_EKGRP |     032     |     100
    Regards,
    Yogesh

  • Problem in creating new implementation for filter dependent badi

    Hi Experts,
       I want to use badi NOTIF_EVENT_POST.It is a filter dependent badi. It is asking filter type while implementing thro se19. Could anyone pls tel me how to create new implementation for the filter dependent badi. Existing filter type is QMART. is there any problem if i change the filter type?
    Thanks in Advance!

    Hi ,
    NOTIF_EVENT_POST is filter dependent and filter values are based on QMART value in table TQ80. You need to specify the filter value ie : QMART value before implimentation , before that check all active implimentations for the same , if u have to impliment on same filter value , you need to deactivate the one which is implimented on same filter value .
    You are not supposed to change the filter type.
    Regards,
    Vamsi
    Edited by: CH. VAMSHI on Sep 29, 2009 11:58 AM

  • Create new tag for selected text using API?

    Hello,
    I want to add new tag for the selected text just like 'Create Tag from selection' .
    is it possible to create tag for selected text using acrobat api?
         please,help me.

    As per sample of snippetRunner for adding tag for selected text.
    I tried below code
    PDPage pg;
    AVDoc avDoc = AVAppGetActiveDoc();
    PDDoc pd = AVDocGetPDDoc(avDoc);
        pg = PDDocAcquirePage(pd, 0);
    ASAtom theSelectionType = AVDocGetSelectionType(avDoc);
    if (theSelectionType == ASAtomFromString("Text")){
        PDTextSelect ts = static_cast<PDTextSelect>(AVDocGetSelection(avDoc));
        PDSTreeRoot pdsTreeRoot;
        CosObj pageObj = PDPageGetCosObj (pg);
        PDSElement newElem;
        PDSElementCreate(pd, &newElem);
        char buf1[64];
        strcpy (buf1, "A new structure element");
        // set its type as "Document" standard type
        PDSElementSetType(newElem, ASAtomFromString ("Document"));
        // set its title
        PDSElementSetTitle(newElem, reinterpret_cast<const ASUns8*> (buf1), strlen(buf1));
        PDSTreeRootInsertKid (pdsTreeRoot, aElem, kPDSAfterLast);
        PDSElementInsertMCAsKid // here something i have to add
    If i have PDTextSelect how i can add tag for selected text.like user add tag using "CreateTagForSelectedText" option.
    please,help me.
    thanks.

  • SAPSCRIPT: Creating new Language for existing form

    Hi Guys,
    I need add an additional language for an existing form. Italian is not available for the this existing form. How can I add this language? do I need to copy the form with language EN? how can I include that form in the existing form? or there are other way to do this? Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Michael Nacionales

    There is a change in the standard code.The reason for the above problem was  because of a missing Enhancemnet point in a standard function module 'CV110_DOC_CREATE_WITH_TEMPLATE'.
    IS-ADEC-MPD  - Enhancement to copy MPD data
    ENHANCEMENT-POINT CV110_DOC_CREATE_WTEMPL_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLCV110.
    +*$*$-Start: CV110_DOC_CREATE_WTEMPL_01----------------------------------------------------------$*$*+
    +**ENHANCEMENT 1  ZSF_AD_MPD_SAPLCV110.    "active version**+
    +*** copy MPD relevant data from templ. doc to current doc**+
      +**CALL FUNCTION 'MPD02_COPY_MPD_DATA'**+
        +**EXPORTING**+
          +**is_draw = ls_draw**+
        +**TABLES**+
          +**ct_drad = lt_drad.**+
    +*ENDENHANCEMENT.**$*$-End:   CV110_DOC_CREATE_WTEMPL_01----------------------------------------------------------$*$*+
    Created a custom enhancement point similar to SAP ECC6.0 EHP 3.0 system.
    The reason was the buffer was not getting cleared previously.After inserting the above code the DIR's are getting created withot any issues.
    Regards,
    Prasad.B

  • Create new characteristics for existing release strategies

    Dear experts,
    Whenever I have a roll-out, I have to create a new characteristic that is the purchase order value in local currency, that is to be assigned to the class used for the Release Strategies of purchase orders.
    The problem is that whenever I do this, all the existing release strategies have an additional characteristic to be maintained. Since I have more than 1.500 release strategies, I have to go through each one of them and except for the new release strategies, put >= zero in this new characteristic.
    Is there any way, that whenever I create this new characteristics, I can define a default value that will be assigned to every existing release strategies in the system?
    I've tried to use the default value, but it only works when I'm introducing the characteristics values for the first time in the release strategies.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You can try LSMW (Direct method) for uploading class values.
    Upload file can hae following structure:
    OBJEK     |     ATINN     |     KLART     |     ATWRT
    Release Grou+Release strategy |     Characteristic name     |     Class type     |     Class Value
    e.g. rel grp is PO, rel strategy is 01, characteristic name is EBAN_EKORG, and class value is 1000 then
    OBJEK     |     ATINN     |     KLART     |     ATWRT
    PO01     |     EBAN_EKORG |     032     |     1000
    multiple characterstics can be
    OBJEK     |     ATINN     |     KLART     |     ATWRT
    PO01     |     EBAN_EKORG |     032     |     1000
    PO01     |     EBAN_EKGRP |     032     |     100
    Regards,
    Yogesh

  • Reason for creating New Version Best practice

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    We know we are creating new version of the DIR when it is required to make a change in the original keeping in tact the Older file also for reference,
    we want to know when a new version of the document is getting created how can we specify, why and what made us to create this new Version, we would like to capture this reason in SAP so the user can easily come to know why this Version is created,
    can you please let us know, where actually are we capturing this details while creating the new version,
    i know there are lot of free entry fields like Generic object Text field, Long text field, change the description, place the text in the WR log field of the new Version,
    which is the best practice so that the user can easily come to know the reason why this new version has been created,
    may be they should see this reason details in CV04N search as well, or immediately when opening the new version.
    Thanks and regards
    Kumar

    Hello Kumar
    Hope following explanation will clarify your questions
    We have to classify our documents broadly in two category  1) Controlled document --means which under goes various level of  / Inspection / review / approval etc with in Organisation e.g. Engg Drawing , Standard Operating Procedure for business purpose, best way for this is use Engineering Change Management (ECM)Functiuon and when you make any up versions, you can track / write key docu ment history in ECM 
    also when you do up version let say in Micosoft word , you can maintain simple table to track what is purpose of change, in what location you are making chnage and its justification.
    For Engineering drawing of 2D /3D we can use Redlining functions to createt the Lawyers to know reviwers observation so that next version thopse are taken care
    2) Uncontrolled Document---Generally they are less significant from document Change Control point of view
    Hope this is useful
    Regards
    GIRISH

  • How to create the new varients for existing generic article.

    Hi all,
          Can any body tell how can i create new varients for existing generic article
        T-Code - MM41 ( IS-Retail).
       Plz help, helpful answers will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Sai

    Hi
    If you have access to the program of the tcode, then go to that tcode click on system->status, to get the program name, go to se38 give that program name and select variants radiobutton, create the variant.
    Regards
    Haritha.

  • Preference to "Create New Versions when making adjustments"

    Isnt the option in Preferences "create new version when making adjustments" seem irrelevant when Ap doesnt touch the original (master) anyway? How is this option intended to be used? Most of the imags for me would be slight tweeks so I wouldnt necessarily want every one of those showing as a 'full new version'.

    yeh, that would seem logical wouldn't it - to create a new version for each session... but that's not what happens.
    i mostly use the HUD and don't close between adjustments but i do sometimes use the side panel which i also don't hide/close between adjustments. i can't remember whether making adjustments via the side panel creates new versions for every adjustment, certainly this behaviour happens when i use the HUD and i'm fairly sure i would have tried the side panel to avoid this annoying behaviour but i can't say for sure and will have to test the side panel behaviour next week if i get time.
    even with the preference for 'create new versions' turned off, there seem to be certain images that always create a new version when i make an adjustment - whether using the HUD or side panel. I haven't figured out an exact pattern to this but it seems to be something to do with those files that have been 'sent to external editor'. subsequent adjustments within aperture always create a new version - haven't a clue why...
    just as an aside, sometimes when i make adjustments (particularly sharpening or noise reduction) i get single pixel wide horizontal lines of noise appearing across my images, which are there when i print or export too, not just screen artifacts due to a badly processed preview...hmmm...anyone else noticed this or has found a post about ways to avoid this?
    all that said, aperture is a godsend for my workflow
    MacBook 2.0 White   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Aperture creating new version of image for each adjustment applied!

    To anyone out there who can sort this one out, I will be forever grateful!
    Here's the problem. I'll be jamming away in Aperture, adjusting photos like a madman. After adjusting a random number of photos (it usually varies between 5-30 photos or so after starting Aperture each time), the adjustments panel will no longer update when I click on a new image (i.e. it holds the info from the last image I adjusted and will continue to apply new adjustments to that last image even if another image is highlighted). If I switch to the metadata panel and then back to adjustments it will refresh itself and recognize the currently selected image (although I have to do this for EACH image I want to adjust once it starts acting up like this). The BIG problem is that even if I get the adjustments panel to recognize the selected image at this point, for EACH adjustment I apply it makes a new version of the image. For example, if I first change the contrast, it will make Version 2 of the image and select it (which is what it's supposed to do for the first adjustment, because I have "create new versions when making adjustments" checked in my preferences), but if I then make another adjustment like changing the saturation, it makes Version 3 of the image (from the master, so that only the saturation adjustment is applied and not the contrast adjustment). As you can imagine, this utterly destroys my once incredibly efficient Aperture workflow and makes it pretty much impossible to use Aperture for adjustments unless I turn off "create new versions when making adjustments" in the preferences, at which point it does seem to work again (although I've only tried it on a few images, so not 100% sure it will work properly even then). If I restart Aperture (or my computer), it will work normally again for a few pictures and then will start acting up again with the same problem.
    Originally I was running into this problem on my PowerBook G4, and so I figured it was just because Aperture didn't like my wussy G4 processor and was acting up when the load got too heavy (after all, the adjustments would work fine for up to 30 images or so). However I recently purchased a sexy iMac 24" 2.8 GHz and maxed out the RAM to 4GB, but I'm still getting the same darned problem with Aperture on my iMac. Yes, I'm using the same library of photos I was using on my PowerBook G4.
    This problem has been plaguing me for about 3 months now (everything else in Aperture works fine so I'm still using it to import and organize my photos, I just haven't been able to make adjustments on large groups of pictures for a while), and I've searched and searched these forums countless times to see if anyone has run into similar problems, but I've not seen a single mention of it. I've also tried EVERYTHING mentioned for similar problems (rebuilding library, vacuuming database, erasing com.apple.aperture.plist preference file, repairing permissions, reinstalling Aperture, making burnt offerings to Steve Jobs), and NOTHING is working. ARRGH!!
    For those who might have some words of wisdom to offer this delighted-***-miserably frustrated Aperture user, here are a few more details about my setup:
    I have a library of about 37,000 photos, the vast majority of them being RAW .CRW files from a Canon 10D. The 25GB library file is stored on my internal hard drive, and all photos are referenced from an external LaCie 500GB FireWire 400 hard drive. I have a LOT of export plug-ins installed in Aperture, but no image adjustment plugins. I have generated previews turned off for all projects. I've had the same problem on both my PowerBook G4 and new iMac 24" 2.8 GHz. One other thing worth mentioning is that instead of upgrading from 2.1 (which was already giving me this problem) to 2.1.2, I downloaded the full version of 2.1.2 and installed it. I noticed that my 2.1 Aperture.app file was less than 100MB, whereas the 2.1.2 Aperture.app file is over 300MB. Don't know if that's normal or not.
    The only other thing I can think of to try at this point is to load a new library into Aperture and import a large group of pictures and make adjustments to them to potentially see if my problem is being caused by Aperture or by the library. Will probably try that tomorrow.
    I would appreciate any advice or feedback anyone can offer about this nasty little problem, as it's giving me a serious hormonal imbalance.
    THANKS!

    Thanks for the reply RB, but my current workflow depends on me creating new versions when I make adjustments. I suppose as a temporary solution I will probably have to either turn this preference off or just be willing to constantly restart Aperture. At least I finally found another thread with the same problem, so finally I don't feel completely alone in the far reaches of the Aperture universe. For anyone who is interested, here is the link to that thread:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8555067
    It appears this problem is closely related to the ubiquitous black viewer problem that seems to be plaguing far more users than my issue (although I've run into the black viewer problem a few times myself), as both problems force Aperture to output the following message to Console:
    Main Thread Exception in Aperture: * -NSCFArray objectAtIndex:: index (1) beyond bounds (1)
    It seems that both of these problems existed in Aperture 1 and 1.5 up until the 1.5.6 upgrade which seems to have fixed it, but then with Aperture 2 the problem seems to have returned. At least that's the gist of what I've been reading on a number of threads. Whatever the case, I hope Apple gets this sorted out in their next update!
    As it appears there is no proper answer to this problem at the moment, I'm gonna go ahead and mark this thread answered (and since you were kind enough to at least take the time to reply RB, you can be credited with the answer... thanks!).

  • Why are my options to create a new version for ipod or iphone don't work?

    I've just downloaded the digital copy of the little mermaid & in the end, it didn't wnt to sync, so I searched a little on how I can make it work.
    It was mostly the same answer that I found everywhere:
    select the File menu > Create New Version > Create iPad or Apple TV version.  Once the media has been converted, sync the iPad version to the iPad.
    But the thing is, I tried & my options when I click on create new version, they all stay gray, why? It is so frustrating

    Hi, welcome to Apple Discussions.
    Select all the tracks of the album and *Get Info*. On the Info tab fill in the *Album Artist* e.g. as "Various Artists" or on the Options tab set *Part of a compilation* to Yes. Ideally (see link below) do both. If iTunes is organising your tracks then those set as compilations will end up in the Compilations folder, otherwise *Album Artist* overrides Artist.
    You can edit these properties before you rip a CD (1), or for existing files (2 & 3).
    For further details see Grouping Tracks Into Albums. Although aimed at linking things within iTunes/iDevices if you fix all the potential problems described therein it will also do most if not all of the work required to tidy up the folders in Explorer/Finder. Windows users may find that iTunes fails to move artwork files created by Windows Media Player for which I have written a script called CleanDeadArt.
    tt2

  • Problem with this new version is when i open firefox something change my home page to mozila defalut page and in the new tab open mozila firefox first run page.Sorry for my bad English

    Problem with this new version is when i open firefox something change my home page to mozila defalut page and in the new tab open mozila firefox first run page.Sorry for my bad English

    Sounds like this issue:
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Preferences_not_saved
    * [[Preferences are not saved]]

  • I have an MP4 home vid in itunes.  I cannot get it onto my ipad. I tried "create new version" to make it into a format suitable for ipad, but the options were greyed out.  Any help appreciated.

    I have created a home video, using my Panasonic Camera, and a high definition SD card.  It is now on my computer as anMTS file, which I converted into an MP4 as well.
    But I cannot get this file onto my ipad.  I have tried countless ways.  I finally today thought I had the answer..........the MP4 file is now in Itunes (I hate itunes, it is so user-unfriendly) and I read that I need to click on it, go to "create new version" and select the ipad version.  But those options were greyed out.  !!!  Aaargh!  Frustration!  Any help gratefully recieved.

    You can try and import your MP4 using free OPlayer HD Lite via File Sharing.
    https://itunes.apple.com/sg/app/oplayerhd-lite-best-free-video/id385896088?mt=8

  • Aperture creating new versions unexpectedly

    One of my projects in Aperture started behaving unexpectedly yesterday and I still haven't figured out why. I was reviewing proofs with a client and we were making selections and adjustments to some of the images. We were working in a smart album that was filtered on 5-star ratings. We made a few new versions of some of these images within the smart album, made adjustments, and ultimately selected her picks by adding the keyword "pick" to her selected images. In retrospect I probably will change that flow so that when I make my original selects I will rate them as a 4-star and then up it to a 5-star when the client makes their picks.
    But for now, back to the problem. All was going well with the workflow until I tried to rearrange some of the images within the smart album. When I dragged the first image to a new location it created new versions of several images. I think this happened multiple times before I realized what had happened, so before I new it the album was filled with duplicate versions. I deleted the duplicate versions, but I find that they keep cropping up unexpectedly. If I go to the parent project and then return to the smart album, it makes a duplicate version of every image in the album.
    A light table and a book within the project are now also giving me trouble in that they claim to have images in them, but even with all queries turned off they do not show any of the images (and yes, the "show all images" button is selected).
    Any thoughts on what could be wrong?
    G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    Mmm...I don't think this explanation tells the whole story.
    Dragging an image out of the project container and into an enclosed (non-smart) album does NOT automatically generate a new version of the master image local to that album; instead, the album is populated with a new reference to the original version. Dragging that same image again out of the project container - or the first album - to yet another album generates yet another reference to the same underlying version.
    Edits performed in any of these containers propagate to the images in all containers (within a particular project, of course), demonstrating that each type of container holds merely a reference to the project's single original version.
    The Aperture User Manual is a bit ambiguous in its description (Chapter 5 pg 113) of the distinction between "copying" and "moving" images between projects and albums; I believe that when it refers to copying versions it's really talking about copying REFERENCES to versions between various containers.
    So, long story short, I don't think moving images between the various types of containers within a single project can explain your duplicated images.
    15" Alu PB 1.25GHZ G4 FW800 1GB RAM 100GB HDD   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   Aperture 1.1.1

Maybe you are looking for