Problem in Reset Posted Depreciation in quality system

Hi Experts,
This is very Urgent, Please advise me the Solution!
We have configured the Asset Accounting in Development Client and tested every thing like posted the Depreciation with TC: AFAB for 2 months i.e., Jan and Feb, 2007 and after that we have transported the same configuration to Quality system. And we have a problem i.e., when i posted Asset Acquistion and trying to run the depreciation for the month of Jan 2007, it is saying only allowed for 3rd month but not allowing me for 1st and 2nd month in 2007 year in quality system.
I don't know why this?
I have not posted any depreciation in Quality system and have choosen the option "Reset Posted Depciation with TC: OAGL.
Now i am getting different Error i.e., Please see the bleow message:
You can only post in new year after closing the previous year.                                                                               
Message no. AA687                                                                               
Diagnosis                                                                               
You want to post in a new fiscal year. However, a posting must have been
    made in the last period in the previous fiscal year before you can do   
    this.                                                                               
What to do                                                                               
Post to the last period in the previous year first".
Please advise me ASAP what to do now coz this is very urgent.
Thanks in advance for your immediate help.
Waiting for your Earliest reply!
With Best Regards,
GRS.Achary.

If you are sure that there is no depreciation run executed in the previous periods, check the settings you made in Tcode OAYC. Reset the period if needed.
If you have already run Depreciation and you want to delete the test-run data, use Tcode OAGL. Remember this run will delete ALL depreciation log. This run will delete postings in Asset Accounting ONLY. You have to adjust the GL balances manually. (Please refer the documentation to this Tcode)
Thanks
Palani

Similar Messages

  • Reset Posted Depreciation

    Dear Forum Experts,
    Unfortunately i was selected  Reset Posted Depreciation tab.  Path -(spro-Financial Accounting- Asset Accounting- asset accounting(lean Implementation) - Preparing for production start up- Reset posted depreciation ) Now problem is all periods posted depreciation deleted for all assets in company code. Please help me how to get  posted depreciation values again for all assets.
    Many thanks for your valuable advise in advance.
    Regards,
    Nagesh

    Hi,
    As Alex mentioned, you need to execute depreciation for all ther periods again.  But one caution, the depreciation would have been reset only in AA but not in GL.  When you execute all over again, GL postings will further posted with these values.  So, you may need to post reversal entries in GL to sync up with AA.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Problem with reset SMC

    hello guys .. i have problem by resetting the smc in yosemite system . ... i've did it for a twice now .. and it didn't make any sense like it doesn't change anything in settings or in touch pad or in sounds
    or anything ...  and when it was rebooting i've never heard sound of the fan ?? so what i have to do ?
    and p.s : i've pressed Shift+ctrl+alt with the power button for a 5 seconds .. and i've released the shift+ctrl+alt buttons and i turn on the lap again ...
    so what i have to do to reset it correctly ?
    Model Name: MacBook Pro
      Model Identifier: MacBookPro8,1
      Processor Name: Intel Core i5
      Processor Speed: 2.3 GHz
      Number of Processors: 1
      Total Number of Cores: 2
      L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
      L3 Cache: 3 MB
      Memory: 4 GB
      Boot ROM Version: MBP81.0047.B27
      SMC Version (system): 1.68f99
      Serial Number (system): C17FFQEKDH2G
      Hardware UUID: FF9040EB-AAF5-5D01-BC5E-006BFC34890F
      Sudden Motion Sensor:
      State: Enabled

    and it still like i don't made any reset !!
    If I deciphered the tortured sentence, I suggest you read what I posted instead of deciding that there was no reset. THERE IS NO VISUAL CONFIRMATION OF A SMC RESET!
    Barry
    P.S. I am definitely not your "bro."

  • Problems posting depreciation for legacy assets taken over

    We recently loaded conversion balances for asset with a takeover date of Aug 2nd, with various prior capitalization dates. The date of last depreciation posted was set as Dec 31st 2004. When we try to post unplanned depreciation for all of 2005 in December, the system says depreciation for period 12 was already posted, so do a repeat run. There was no depreciation actually posted for period 12, because there were no assets before today. A check of the expense account and depreciation report and a search by depreciation doc type confirm this.
    When we try a repeat run, it says cannot do it for period 12, need to do it for period 000. When we try it for period 000, it says no depreciation areas to post to. The config has been checked and the depreciation areas and posting periods are set up correctly.  The load, the depreciation posting and all steps for closing of asset fiscal year were successfully carried out in DEV and QA. The only difference in PRD is that the year was closed before the load, but we reopened it.
    Also, the opening balance in the asset history sheet for 2006 does not agree with the closing balance for 2005, the difference being the planned depreciation amount. The FI-AA reconciliation report RAABST02 also shows a difference only in the Accum Depn accounts, equal to this figure. So clearly the system THINKs depreciation was posted. When we try to close asset fiscal year it says depreciation was not completely posted for 2005, but it won't let us post it. HELP!

    I tested this whole thing in DEV and QA before we did the same process in PRD, and I was able to run depreciation in those clients, so I think the problem is specific to PRD. As I mentioned, the only difference in PRD is that we had closed the fiscal year so I had to re-open it to perform the load.
    Yes, the problem I have been experiencing has been for Dec 2005 and I don't expect there to be anything in TABA because the system simply will not let me post depreciation of any type, for any period in 2005. I've tried it for period 8 as well. No matter what, it keeps insisting that depreciation was already run for period 12 2005 and to do a repeat run. When I try a repeat run, it says 'the last posting run was for period 000' and that only period 000 can be posted in the repeat run. When I try doing it for period 000, it says "there are no areas to post to". 
    I did try to reverse the Y/E close with OAAQ for 2005, but still no luck getting depreciation running. So you see why resetting it was looking like a good option? :-0

  • Transfer posting stocks from quality inspection to unrestricted, problem

    Hello Guys,
    kindly help me i am having problems doing transfer posting (mb1b) using movement type 321. because in my stock overview (mmbe) thera are stocks in Quality Inspection, i want that to be trasfered in Unrestricted Stock. that's why i execute transfer posting but there is an error occured doing it so. the error is "change the inspection stock of material 1078 in QM only". how could i make this stocks transfer to unrestricted?
    please advise me the correct way to settled this.
    thanks and regards,

    Hello Guys,
    I am very thankful for all of you contributing to this thread of mine hope in some other time you can work it out with me again I already done all this resolutions you have mention and I also know that is all the right wya to solve this issue but i dont see my problem exists on the configuration in material tpye allocation because in our business sample the FERTin standard SAP but with us it is customized name, have different code it was not define in TLtype in material allocation for quality inspection (Q), now i know what to do to call our admin to authorized my config there.
    Thank you so much i will closed this thread now please help me in some of other query next time. hehehehe..
    Regards,

  • Problem with Posted Depreciation

    Hi All...!
    I am having a little doubt regarding the posted depreciation.
    My company used one asset #1000 and its Gross book value is Rs.27,000 (Asset Value Date 18-04-2006) and on the basis of the useful life time, the depreciation comes around Rs.5400 for one year.
    Now we want to transfer the value of asset #1000 to new asset #2000 (Asset Value Date 18-04-2006).
    When we tried to use T-code ABUMN and simulate the transaction
    the system shows the value of the new asset is Rs.27,450( Rs.27000+one month depreciation Rs.450 of the asset#1000)
    I request you that can you help me to resolve the issue that we want to keep the Gross book Value of new asset# 2000 as $ 27,000 and write up the old asset posted depreciation amount.
    Thanks with Regd,
    Bala

    Hi Andreas Mann
    Thank you for your information and could you please advise me how to do
    because the old asset detail- Asset#1000
    Gross Book value: 27,000
    Asset Value Date: 18.04.2006
    How can we do the changes the Asset Value Date - Asset# 2000
    can you kindly assist me?
    Thanks with regards,
    Bala

  • Field Exits problem in Quality system after trasports

    Dear Freinds,
    We did Field Exit changes in Developement system and the changes are working perfect when we tested.
    Where as we transport the changes to QA(Quality system) the filed exit is not working. We checked the code, and the code was moved to QA. We set the flag for field by sitting Basis guys (field status as YES).  Even though field exit changes are not working in QA.
    Could you please suggest is there any other settings we have to make sure to work this feild exit in QA...? And in case any manuval settings in QA the same we need to do in prodcution manuvally..
    thanks in advance...
    Cheers !

    the profile parameter should be set on ALL application servers & system should be restarted. If your exits do not work after that, just try to deactivate/activate your exits directly on QA system. It will certainly help.

  • Posting depreciation on special period

    Hi,
    We have this problem. We have 2 evaluation areas: 01 (fiscal area) and 20 (cost accounting area).
    For the previous years SAP correctly posted depreciations on period 12 for area 20 and on period 13 for area 01.
    For year 2007 we had some problem. All the depreciations have been posted on period 12 (both the areas). We would like to know: why this happen?? We have lounch transaction AFAB for period 12 and the system posted both areas. Why?
    Where can I customize the period on which the balance account have to be updated?
    And do you have some ideas related to the correction of this problem??
    Thanks in advance,
    MV

    Hi,
    I'm Lara .. I've the same problem ... did you find the solution?
    Tx
    Lara

  • Use OAGL in Production to clear posted depreciation

    Is it possible to use OAGL in production to clear all posted depreciation?
    If No, can anyone tell me why?
    Thank you.

    My client had asset revaluation (reduction in asset value) in Dec. 2009. Because of lack of resource at that time, they carried out this revaluation in strange way.
    They didnu2019t use standard SAP transaction for revaluation but created two Depreciation and Accumulated depreciation (Non Reconciliation) accounts and adjusted P&L by passing manual adjustment entries for Assets.  They kept passing manual entries for following months.
    Now they want to get rid of those accounts they created and manual entries they posted. Also want to carry out revaluation with standard transaction in Dec.09 by opening books.
    To do that, I need to reverse the posted depreciation for Jan and Feb. and post revaluation. After that I need to carry out correct depreciation for Jan and Feb.
    Here is my action plan.
    1.Use OAGL to clear posted depreciation.
    2. Then Turn off Reconciliation flags and adjust GL account balance manually.
    3. Put Reconciliation flags on and carry out normal depreciation for months before Dec 09.
    4. Post revaluation entry and carry out depreciation for DEC, JAN and FEB.
    This has solved my problem in test system, as Client is interested in overall P&L from the audit point. By this way I see that my FI and AA also reconciles.
    I donu2019t see any solution other than OAGL.
    Please let me know if any transaction available to deal with this situation. Your valuable inputs are appreciated.
    Thank you.

  • Issue in Process Controlled workflow for Shopping cart in Quality system.

    Hello All,
    I ahve configured a Process controlled workflow in SRM 7.0  with custom resolver, and I am facing an issue taht the Workflow works well in Development but in Quality the approvers are dropped after SC is ordered in Quality system.
    The SC Workflow drops the approvers picked up from the Interface  method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVERGET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP and IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVERGET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID of BADI /SAPSRM/BD_WF_RESP_RESOLVER. The approvers can be seen in the shopping cart Approval preview Tab until the SC is ordered.
    I have compared the OSS notes relevant for Workflow, all of them have been transported, Also I compared and checked general Workflow settings, BRF Config and  Process level  settings in Dev and Quality, everything is same.
    Also while debugging; the approvers can be seen in the decision set table in the create_process_forecast method of class /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MANAGER.
    Kindly let me know what else i can check to find the root cause.
    Thank you in advance for help!
    Regards
    Prasuna.

    Hello Vinita;
    Thanks for the input and sorry for the not so "ASAP" reply;
    From what I'm seeing in from your 2 screenshot, i strongly believe that the problem is even before the Z implementation /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID (in which the FM i ZSRM_GET_USER_FROM_PGRP is called. I think the problem could be in the process level determination  ZSRM_WF_BRF_0EXP000_SC_APP100. Let me explain:
    In your  cases where not buyer is determined,  in the approval tab there is not even a process level for buyer approval. If the problem were indeed in the implementation  /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID  then the process level would be there, but the system will display, instead of the name of the buyer(if the buyer determination fails) a red label with the message:  "With the strategy "Buyer determination" an approver could not be determined (or something like that..please check the image at the end of the text)".
    I can propose a way to discard this: Implement the method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS of class ZCL_BADI_SC_WC (in case you didn't know, in this method you can specify an "default" approver in case that the determination of approver in GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID fails). The idea is to specify an default approval and see how it behaves:
    If the user you indicated in the method GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS appears as approver, then yes, the problem is arises from implementation GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID, in which case it could be a data problem (peharps in pposa_bbp?). You could also check in TX SU53 with the users with this problem to see if there's a missing authorization objetc.
    If, in the other hand, the "default" approver is not shown, it means that the process level buyer determination is not even called, so you should check in more detail ZSRM_WF_BRF_0EXP000_SC_APP100 and /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MANAGER > Determine process restart –method ----- (i have never used this method, so i could not tell if  it could be the source of the problem).
    Also, you could implement the method GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS in this way so the default approver would be the WF administrator indicated in the customizing (or you could just append directly any user you want):
    METHOD /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS.
       DATA: lv_admin_expr TYPE swd_shead-admin_expr,
             lv_admin      TYPE swd_shead-wfi_admin,
             lv_admin_type TYPE sy-input,
             ls_agent      TYPE  /sapsrm/s_wf_approver.
       CALL FUNCTION 'SWD_WF_DEFINITION_ADMIN_GET'
         IMPORTING
           default_admin_expr = lv_admin_expr
           default_admin      = lv_admin
           default_admin_type = lv_admin_type.
       ls_agent-approver_id = lv_admin.
       APPEND ls_agent TO rt_agent.
    ENDMETHOD.
    Error of agent determination:
    Please let me know the result of the test with the implementation of method GET_FALLBACK_AGENT. By doing this we could ensure if really the problem is in method GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID or before.  I just made the test in our system and I'm almost sure that you wont get the default approver, but i could be wrong. 
    Any question please let me know.
    Best regards
    Cristian R.

  • An error has occurred. Please try again, and if the problem persists, contact your help desk or system administrator. (Error 3000)

    Hi,
    When i open my Password Reset portal then provide Username credentials in text box and click on next then asked the Securites Question Answers to me,i provide the correct Answers to the securites Question after this password reset portal asked
    me New Password and Confirm Password then click on next for resetting the password then gives below Error only for 2 Users. and all other users are working fine.
    An error has occurred. Please try again, and if the problem persists, contact your help desk or system administrator. (Error 3000:)
    Regards
    Anil Kumar

    Anything in the event log?

  • Change in Useful life of asset in mid year, but the previous posted depreciation should not be changed

    Dear Experts,
    I have a requirement in one of my client, We need to extend the useful life of asset in mid of an asset fiscal year and the depreciation which was posted in the previous should not be changed.
    Requirement:
    Useful life of asset  is to be extended after completing depreciation for 4 years and in-between the current asset fiscal year. Provided the present asset value has to be taken as the new book value of the asset and the depreciation posted henceforth to be posted based on the new asset value till the remaining useful life.
    Previously posted depreciation should be unchanged.
    Analysis:
    1.      The fiscal Year followed - October to September.
    2.      The useful life of asset will be changed, and the depreciated value posted till 31/mar 2014 will have the old depreciation value ( based on the original acquisition value)
    3.      The Depreciation key used in of type LINR (linear), depreciation value will be calculated based on the Book value till the asset value becomes ZERO at the end of useful life of the asset.
    4.      We can change the useful life of the asset at the end of a Asset fiscal year say FY- 2014, if this is done the existing configuration will take the Book value of the asset at the end of the Fiscal as the asset value and the new depreciation will be calculated based on the new useful life of the asset. The asset value will become ZERO at the end of the newly changed Useful Life.
    5.      But the requirement is that the useful life of the asset will be changed exactly half way in between existing Asset fiscal (i.e., 31/03/2014), if this is done system will change the depreciation value based on the new useful life ( since the Dep Key is LINR), but the depreciation value will change from the fiscal start say October 2013 to September 2014 ), which will not satisfy the requirement of the client. Since the depreciation which is already posted from October 2013 to March 2014 should not be changed.
    Note:
    1. We are not willing to retire the asset and create a new asset with the remaining book value as asset value and start depreciation.
    Kindly let me know if the requirement can be fulfilled without retiring the asset.

    Dear All,
    This requirement has been completed.
    1. I created New Multi level valuation method with base 26 ( Net book value w/o Revaluation ).
    2. New depreciation key was created and the above method was assigned to it. I never changed the Base method.
    3. new interval was created in the depreciation area, with this created dep key and extended the useful life of the asset. The depreciation was calculated according to the requirement.
    Originally the asset had useful life of  5 Years, I changed the asset useful life to 8 years now with new Depreciation key 2001.
    Depreciation was already posted to the asset till 04- 2013 for an amount of 148.27 SAR.
    Net Book value carried forward to 2013 = 1575.56 SAR
    Depreciation already posted till 4th period =   148.27 SAR
    Current Net book value after useful life extension           = 1427.29 SAR .
    Now the new depreciation key 2001 with Multilevel method 201, will take this Net-book value as Asset value and will depreciate along the useful life of the asset till it becomes zero.
    Planned depreciation of 2013 ( remaining 6 months) = 166.24 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2014 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2015 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2016 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2017 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2018 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2019 = 131.25 SAR
    Total      = 1427.29 SAR ( the Asset value becomes zero at the end of its remaining useful life.
    The previously posted depreciation from 01.01.2013 to 30.04.2013 was untouched.

  • Unable to view the messages in sxmb_moni - Quality System

    Hi,
    We have got a strange problem in the diaplay view for  TCode - sxmb_moni for our Quality system. 
    We have different scenarios - Idoc to Web Service (synchronous using BPM), Proxy to Web Service both inbound and outbound etc all to the same Webservice.
    Whenever a scenario executes in the Development system, we are able to view the WSDL data that is sent to the Web Service along with the response given by the Web Service in all the cases successfull or unsuccessful.
    But if the scenario is executed in the Quality system there are a few different cases for the display view in sxmb_moni :
    Case 1 ) Incase of IDoc to Webservice "Successfull " (ECC -> PI-> Webservice)Scenario we are able to see only the data that is sent to the Webservice. We are not able to view the WSDL sent to the Webservice and the Response received.
    Case 2)  Incase of IDoc to Webservice " Unsuccessfull / Error " (ECC -> PI-> Webservice) Scenario We are able to view all the data that is sent to the Webservice right from the Idoc to BPM, the WSDL, the response received.
    Case 3) In case of Proxy scenarios both inbound and outbound "Successfull ", we are neither able to view the data that is sent to the Webservice or the response received from the Web Service.
    Case 4 ) In case of Proxy scenarios both inbound and outbound "Unsuccessfull ", we are able to view only the error and not the data that is exchanged between both the systems.
    The point to be noted is that in case of Successfull executions the data is well received at the Web Service end.
    What could be  possibly missing between the two systems Development and Quality due to which we are not able to view messages in the T-Code SXMB_MONI
    Thanks a lot for all the inputs!

    Hi Lalit,
    In sxmb_ad transaction, go to configuration integration engine (edit) and set Trace Level = 3.
    See that:
    The specified item was not found.
    Regards,
    Carme.

  • Error in transporting the Transformation to Quality system

    Hi All,
    I am trying to transport the transformation which has field level routine as well as start and end routine.
    I have basically ehanced the standard routine and it works perfectly fine in dev server . I have even loaded the data and generated reports on this cube.
    Now i am trying to transport it to Quality system. It throws up some "syntax error in routine" error. Very strange.
    All my routine in Dev is working but during transport ther is some issue.
    i saw some post on same but they are suggesting to regenerate a new transformation. For me this will be a nightmare as there are so many routnies at field level and as end routine.
    Kindly suggest how can i rectify this error.
    Note:- I had generated this transformation via old update rules with Migration function.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anup

    Hi Anindya,
    Below is my source code for one field level routine in transformation.
    FORM routine_0080
      TABLES
       p_monitor         STRUCTURE rsmonitor
      USING
        COMM_STRUCTURE TYPE _ty_s_sc_1__rule_52
      CHANGING
        RESULT         TYPE _ty_s_tg_1_full-srvclen
        RETURNCODE     LIKE sy-subrc
        ABORT          LIKE sy-subrc
      RAISING
        cx_sy_arithmetic_error
        cx_sy_conversion_error.
    * init variables
    * fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor entries
      DATA: ultimo LIKE sy-datum.
      IF g_record_no <> RECORD_NO.
        g_record_no = RECORD_NO.
        CLEAR: employee_wa, person_wa.
        CLEAR: employee_md, person_md.
      ENDIF.
      PERFORM read_md_employee
              USING    COMM_STRUCTURE-employee
                       COMM_STRUCTURE-calday
                       RECORD_NO
                       RECORD_ALL
                       SOURCE_SYSTEM
              CHANGING employee_wa
                       RETURNCODE.
      employee_md = employee_wa.
      PERFORM calculate_ultimo
              USING COMM_STRUCTURE-calday+0(6)
                     RECORD_NO
                     RECORD_ALL
                     SOURCE_SYSTEM
              CHANGING ultimo
                       RETURNCODE.
      IF NOT employee_md-entrydate IS INITIAL.
        RESULT = ultimo+0(4) - employee_md-entrydate+0(4).
        IF ultimo+4(4) LT employee_md-entrydate+4(4).
          RESULT = RESULT - 1.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    * result value of the routine
    * if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
      RETURNCODE = 0.
    * if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
      p_monitor[] = MONITOR[].
      CLEAR:
        MONITOR[].
    CLASS lcl_transform IMPLEMENTATION.
      METHOD compute_0AGE_RANGE.
    *   IMPORTING
    *     request     type rsrequest
    *     datapackid  type rsdatapid
    *     SOURCE_FIELDS-CALDAY TYPE /BI0/OICALDAY
    *     SOURCE_FIELDS-EMPLOYEE TYPE /BI0/OIEMPLOYEE
    *    EXPORTING
    *      RESULT type _ty_s_TG_1-AGE_RANGE
        DATA:
          MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
    *$*$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        *-*
      Data:
        COMM_STRUCTURE   type _ty_s_SC_1__RULE_20,
        l_subrc          type sy-tabix,
        l_abort          type sy-tabix,
        ls_monitor       TYPE rsmonitor,
        ls_monitor_recno TYPE rsmonitors.
      data:
        l_monitor        type standard table of rsmonitor.
      REFRESH:
        MONITOR.
    * Runtime attributs
        SOURCE_SYSTEM  = p_r_request->get_logsys( ).
        MOVE-CORRESPONDING SOURCE_FIELDS to COMM_STRUCTURE.
    *  Migrated update rule call
      Perform routine_0070
      TABLES
        l_monitor
      USING
        COMM_STRUCTURE
      CHANGING
        RESULT
        l_subrc
        l_abort.
    *-- Convert Messages in Transformation format
        LOOP AT l_monitor INTO ls_monitor.
          move-CORRESPONDING ls_monitor to MONITOR_REC.
          append monitor_rec to MONITOR.
        ENDLOOP.
        IF l_subrc <> 0.
          RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE CX_RSROUT_SKIP_RECORD.
        ENDIF.
        IF l_abort <> 0.
          RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE CX_RSROUT_ABORT.
        ENDIF.
    I am not able to change the code which are marked with " * ". Where can i change the code here?
    Regards,
    Anup

  • Problem while 're-posting' a cancelle Invoice with Exchange Rate Difference

    Hi Gurus,
    We are facing a problem while re-posting an Invoice with Exchange Rate Difference. I say re-posting because this invoice was previously posted and reversed on the same date. Here is the scenario along with the relevant postings:
    1)
    G/R is posted in September when the exchange rate for dollar was, say, Rs. 49 = 1 USD.
    Posting:
    Service A/C.....100 USD (Rs. 4900)
         To SR/IR Clearing A/C...100 USD (Rs. 4900)
    2)
    MIRO is done in October, when the exchange rate was, say, Rs. 48 = 1 USD. Thus, the exchange difference posting was done in the respective accounts.
    Posting:
    SR/IR Clearing A/C......100 USD (Rs. 4900)
         To Vendor A/C...........90 USD (Rs. 4320)
         To TDS A/C..............10 USD (Rs.  480)
         To Exch. Difference A/C. 0 USD (Rs.  100)
    This was the correct entry, however we missed out some TDS codes and thus needed to reverse this entry and repost it.
    3)
    Now this invoice was reversed (T.Code MIRO) in october itself on exactly the same date on which invoice was created, and it resulted in the following postings:
    Vendor A/C......90 USD (Rs. 4320)
    TDS A/C.........10 USD (Rs.  480)
         To SR/IR Clearing A/C...100 USD (4800, i.e. 48 * 100, Rs.48 being the exchange rate in october)
    4)
    Now when we try to post MIRO again, it is posting the following entry:
    SR/IR Clearing A/C......97.96 USD (Rs. 4800)
    Exch. Difference A/C.....2.04 USD (Rs.    0)
         To Vendor A/C........... 85 USD (Rs. 4080)
         To TDS1 A/C............. 10 USD (Rs.  480)
         To TDS2 A/C.............  5 USD (Rs.  240)
    This is a wrong entry. SR/IR clearing A/C should have been debited by 100 USD (Rs. 4900), and the Exch. Rate difference account should have been credited by 0 USD (Rs. 100)
    Can someone please help us with this. What the system seems to be doing is, that when the Invoice was reversed, the value that got reversed for SR/IR Clearing A/C was 100 USD but with Rs. 4800 instead of Rs. 4900. Now, when we try to repost the invoice, the system divided this value by the exchange rate prevalent in September, i.e. Rs. 49, thus the resultant value 97.96 USD (i.e.  4800 / 49).
    Please help.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Angad Nagpal

    Solved.
    The final entry is correct, as the net result in the G/L balances is the same. For further information please refer to notes 116250 and 46564.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Angad Nagpal

Maybe you are looking for

  • SAP Conversion Agent Studio Preview Version

    Hi, Does anyone have knowledge about SAP Conversion Agent Studio Preview Version? I've downloaded it from SDN and it says it comes with an Eclipse version, but i doesnt. When i try to point it to my existing Eclipse it says it needs version 2.1.2 oe

  • Ipad 3G International Usage

    Hello everyone, i hoping to be an Ipad user in the near future and i have a question about the 3G. As a UK user... if i brought a 3G sim card and then went on holiday or anywhere other than the UK. Would i still remain connected to the 3G network or

  • Enterprise connectivity toolkit and LabVIEW 8

    Hi All,     Does anyone know whether the Enterprise Connectivity Toolkit is available for LabVIEW 8.0? Trying to put together a proposal and I'm not sure, looking at the web site. It is sometimes difficult doing business at one of these inflection po

  • Masking sensitive data in the messages?

    All, We are getting some sensitive data from a legacy system that needs to be imported into R/3. There is a translation service - that translates the sensitive data into public format. The question i have is - though we will be able to use XI to call

  • How do I get iMessages on my laptop

    I have Mavericks on my MacBook Pro. How do I access my iMessages (shown on my iPhone) on my laptop? Supposedly Mavericks allows this function.