Problem with Cisco Secure Access Server 3.0

Hi All,
Please what is my problem? I use Cisco Secure Access Server Version 3.0 for Windows 2000/NT Servers to authenticate users on our wireless network. I however wish to assign monthly time limits to each user after which he/she will no longer have access until next month or the timer is reset. I tried this with the "User Usage Quota" under User setup. I set the Server to "Limit user to X hours of online time per Month" and enabled the "Use these settings" and also checked the box by the side of the option. I saved and restarted my server. Unfortunetly the settings did not work for all the users whose quotas I set.
What Am I doing wrong. Please assist.
Chafe

Do you have your AP's sending accounting data? If not, ACS has no way of knowing how long they've been online?
You can utilize your ACS logging to see what your accounting looks like to confirm whether you are receiving accounting packets or not?
HTH
Jeff

Similar Messages

Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine OR Cisco Secure Access Server ?

Which product is really affected, the Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine which is a hardware applliance with software from 3.2 to 4.2 or the Cisco Secure Access Control Server Software appliance available for installing as a virtual machine into VMware ESX/ESXi 5.0 with 5.X software ?
Thank you for clarifying
Best regards
Marco

Hi Thomas,
You can download ACS for windows 4.1 or 4.2 from the below listed link:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/acs-win-eval
For ACS 5.x, please visit cisco.com
Download software > Security > Cisco Secure Access Control System 5.x > Secure Access Control System Software
HTH
Regards,
Jatin
Plz rate helpful posts-

Problem with Cisco Secure agent instalaltion

Hi,
I am having problems with installing the Cisco Secure agent 5.2-203 on a RHEL 3.0 AS server.
I gives me the following error
[root@ABC CSCOcsa]# ./install_rpm.sh
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 6)
Preparing packages for installation...
CSAagent-5.2-203
cc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Dlinux -Dkernel -I. -I/usr/src/linux-2.4/include -I../ ../../include/unix -pipe -Os -march=i686 -fno-defer-pop -fno-common -mpreferred- stack-boundary=2 -c symbols.c -o symbols.o
cc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Dlinux -Dkernel -I. -I/usr/src/linux-2.4/include -I../ ../../include/unix -pipe -Os -march=i686 -fno-defer-pop -fno-common -mpreferred- stack-boundary=2 -c fshook.c -o fshook.o
cc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Dlinux -Dkernel -I. -I/usr/src/linux-2.4/include -I../ ../../include/unix -pipe -Os -march=i686 -fno-defer-pop -fno-common -mpreferred- stack-boundary=2 -c hotpatch.c -o hotpatch.o
cc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Dlinux -Dkernel -I. -I/usr/src/linux-2.4/include -I../ ../../include/unix -pipe -Os -march=i686 -fno-defer-pop -fno-common -mpreferred- stack-boundary=2 -c adapt.c -o adapt.o
adapt.c: In function `kutil_vprintk':
adapt.c:3442: parse error before `char'
adapt.c:3443: `buf' undeclared (first use in this function)
adapt.c:3443: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
adapt.c:3443: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [adapt.o] Error 1
Failed to build adaptation kernel module. Aborting
error: %post(CSAagent-5.2-203) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
./install_rpm.sh: installation failed
Would like to know where the dependancy is and what is needed to be installed for this installation to work.
Joel

Hi Joel,
The following packages are need to compile the 5.2 agent.
*GCC*
*kernel-snmp-devel*
*compat-libstdc++*
Also 5.2 error messages are alot less friendly than 5.1's

Problem with Cisco 1240AG Access Points

I have a Cisco 1240AG Access point (P/N ? AIR-LAP1242AG-A-K9).
It has come in the lightweight mode.
I just want to know whether I can put it to the autonomous mode.

Hi Indika,
Here is a conversion method (look most of the way down the attached doc);
Reverting the Access Point Back to Autonomous Mode
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp161272
You can convert an access point from lightweight mode back to autonomous mode by loading a Cisco IOS Release that supports autonomous mode (Cisco IOS release 12.3(7)JA or earlier). If the access point is associated to a controller, you can use the controller to load the Cisco IOS release. If the access point is not associated to a controller, you can load the Cisco IOS release using TFTP.
Using a TFTP Server to Return to a Previous Release
Follow these steps to revert from LWAPP mode to autonomous mode by loading a Cisco IOS release using a TFTP server:
Step 1 The static IP address of the PC on which your TFTP server software runs should be between 10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.30.
Step 2 Make sure that the PC contains the access point image file (such as c1200-k9w7-tar.122-15.JA.tar for a 1200 series access point) in the TFTP server folder and that the TFTP server is activated.
Step 3 Rename the access point image file in the TFTP server folder to c1200-k9w7-tar.default for a 1200 series access point, c1130-k9w7-tar.default for an 1130 series access point, and c1240-k9w7-tar.default for a 1240 series access point.
Step 4 Connect the PC to the access point using a Category 5 (CAT5) Ethernet cable.
Step 5 Disconnect power from the access point.
Step 6 Press and hold MODE while you reconnect power to the access point.
Step 7 Hold the MODE button until the status LED turns red (approximately 20 to 30 seconds) and then release.
Step 8 Wait until the access point reboots, as indicated by all LEDs turning green followed by the Status LED blinking green.
Step 9 After the access point reboots, reconfigure it using the GUI or the CLI.
From this doc;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp161272
Hope this helps!
Rob

EAP-TLS problems with Cisco AP541N and Server 2008 NPS

Hi,
I want to use EAP-TLS with my shiny new certificates issued by my new Windows CA, and what happens? Nothing works.
I don't have a clue what I should do. I try to establish a EAP-TLS connection using my Windows CE mobile device, but my cisco AP541N logs this:
Oct 18 15:42:58
info
hostapd
wlan0: STA 00:17:23:xx:xx:xx IEEE 802.1X: Supplicant used different EAP type: 3 (Nak)
Oct 18 15:42:58
warn
hostapd
wlan0: STA 00:17:23:xx:xx:xx IEEE 802.1X: authentication failed - identity 'XXXXXX' EAP type: 13 (TLS)
Oct 18 15:42:58
info
hostapd
The wireless client with MAC address 00:17:23:xx:xx:xx had an authentication failure.
NPS logs this:
Name der Verbindungsanforderungsrichtlinie: Sichere Drahtlosverbindungen 2
Netzwerkrichtlinienname: XXXXXX
Authentifizierungsanbieter: Windows
Authentifizierungsserver: XXXXX
Authentifizierungstyp: EAP
EAP-Typ: -
Kontositzungs-ID: -
Protokollierungsergebnisse: Die Kontoinformationen wurden in die lokale Protokolldatei geschrieben.
Ursachencode: 22
Ursache: Der Client konnte nicht authentifiziert werden, da der angegebene EAP (Extensible Authentication-Protokoll)-Typ vom Server nicht verarbeitet werden kann.
I'm sorry it's german, but the gist is: The server can't process the authentication with the specified EAP type, which should be EAP-TLS.
I think the NAK answer in my cisco AP logs is the problem. Well, not the problem, since it is the standard procedure in the EAP request / challenge, I think, but somebody messes up with it.
Did anybody encounter something like this before? Or just knows what to do?
Thanks in advance
Lenni

Joe:
Having NPS, you have the options to configure PEAP-MSCHAPv2 or EAP-TLS.
EAP-TLS: mandates a certificate on the server as well as a certificate on every single machine for authentication purposes.
PEAP-MSCHAPv2: mandates a certificate on the server only. Users connecting to the wireless network must trust the certificate (or, user devices can be configured to escape this trust and connect even if the server cert is not trusted).
for PEAP-MSCHAPv2, Your options are:
- Buy a certificate for the server from a trusted party (Verisign for example [which was bought later by Symantec]). This way all devices will - by default - trust the server's cert.
- Install local CA. Install a cert on the server and then push the root CA cert for your CA to all client device so they trust this issuer.
- If both up options are not valid for you, what you can do is to configure every single client to ignore the untrusted cert and proceed with the connectoin. (This is a security concern though. not recommended unless really needed).
You must get a cert on the server and all clients must trust that certificate's issuer. Otherwise you'll not be able to user PEAP.
HTH
Amjad
Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"

I have a tesco router and an external hard drive attached to it as a network drive (shared) for my macbook and MB-Air. Have no problems with my MB accessing it, but with MB-AIR it says - 'the version of the server you are trying to connect to is not supp

I have a tesco router and an external hard drive attached to it as a network drive (shared) for my macbook and MB-Air. Have no problems with my MB accessing it, but with MB-AIR it says - 'the version of the server you are trying to connect to is not supported. pls contact your system administrator to resolve the problem'. MB-Air uses maverick downloaded yesterday - upgrade from mountain lion. MB uses snow leopard still, as i am quite used to it and am thinking of upgrade if mavericks work fine on air. Also have parallel on snow leopard but it is no longer supported according to mac website - if i upgrade am i going to lose my parallel and will have to buy a new one!!!

Yes, the Old Master file has a folder for each year where I find all photos from that specific year. I am attaching a screen shot of the file.
In the meantime i have managed to download all photos (it did not download any video files though in mpg, avi, 3gp, m4v,mp4 and mov format) to a new iphoto library. Unfortunately the photos are quite mixed and often doubled up. I ma considering to purchase iphoto library which checks all duplicates in iphoto. this will save me a lot of time. What do you think?

There is a problem with the security certificate of the proxy server. Error code 18 and 38.

Hi All,
After several hours and a short night of sleep I'm out of ideas and hopefully someone here can help me trying to solve this one. First of all the situation:
Exchange 2013 on a remote location with a CA-certificate.
Outlook 2010 and 2013 on different locations, locally installed and on RDS.
When I open Outlook on my laptop all is fine, no errors, good sync, no problem. But when I open Outlook on our Remote Desktop Servers with Outlook 2013 I'm getting errors like "There is a problem with the security certificate of the proxy server. The
name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site. Outlook is unable to connect to this server. (Error code 18)". Opening Outlook 2010 the message is the same, but the error code now is 38.
After this Outlook opens and is working, there's one more error though. After a while an security warning pops up with the message: "Information you exchange with this site cannot be viewed or changed by others. However, there is a problem with the
site's security certificate. * The security certificate was issued by a company you have not chosen to trust. View the certificate to determine whether you want to trust the certifying authority. * The security certificate is valid. * The name on the security
certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site."
Strangest thing is, it is the certificate of my RDS! It isn't my valid en officially bought certificate from my mailserver. What's going on? I'm out of options, what I've tried so far (in random order):
- restarting mailserver and AD;
- restarting switches;
- restarting routers;
- restarting RDS, AD and all other servers;
- bypassed proxyserver for RDS;
- created a new profile;
- checked recently installed updates;
- checked certificate on mailserver;
- checked RDS on a different location, working fine.
Nothing helped, what can I do next? Please advice.
Regards.

Found a thread that solves half my problem (https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/70d18244-889a-4d95-ac3f-e234672a82b2/there-is-a-problem-with-the-proxy-servers-security-certificate-error-when-starting-outlook?forum=exchangesvrclients).
The first message can be suppressed by adding this to the Exchange config:
set-outlookprovider -Identity EXCH -CertprincipalName msstd:webmail.domain.tld
set-outlookprovider -Identity EXPR -CertprincipalName msstd:webmail.domain.tld
Giving the command get-outlookprovider, gives me empty information regarding the certprinipalname. Filled
this and after recreating the profile or deleting the ost-file I still have the second alert with the local certificate of my RDS.
Not completely where I want to be, any help regarding the second alert is greatly appreciated!

Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows 3.0

I have to rebuild a server using Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows 3.0 ... I cannot locate this software under "download software" in cisco.com ..
where can I download a copy for Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows 3.0 ?

Hi,
You can not download the ACS windows Solution engines softwares from the cisco.com > download pages as these s/w are not available there. You can only download patches and remote agent software.
In order to get any ACS software/ upgrade assistance you need to open up a TAC case.
Also, ACS 3.0 is not supported by Cisco anymore..getting support for this version or any 3.x is not possible.
HTH
Regards,
JK

Authentication an admin user on AP1200 with Cisco Secure

Hello,
I am trying to configure a Radius authentication for an administrator logging on an AP1200 via HTTP. On the Cisco Secure ACS server I can see that the authentication was successful and with a trace I can see also the 'Radius Pass' answer coming back to the AP1200.
Unfortunately the administrators gets no access to the AP1200 Web page, and the login windows still ask for username/password. The log of the AP1200 does not give any error message.
The software versions are following:
AP1200 version 12.02A (the last one non-IOS available)
CiscoSecure ACS v2.6 for Windows 2000/NT
Release 2.6(3) Build 2
The return packet 'Radius Pass' answer coming back to the AP1200 is the following:
0000: 00 0b 46 aa a0 e8 00 a0 8e 77 de 75 08 00 45 00 |..F......w.u..E.|
0010: 00 36 0b 70 00 00 7b 11 8b 0e ac 13 58 fd ac 12 |.6.p..{.....X...|
0020: f8 15 06 6d 06 fd 00 22 05 f3*02 2b 00 1a 95 ad |...m..."...+....|
0030: c4 60 e7 21 54 67 2a 60 0e 79 da b1 8f a6 08 06 |.`.!g*`.y......|
0040: ff ff ff ff |....|
I suspect that the the last ff ff ff ff (255.255.255.255) shall be equal to the IP address of the AP1200 which was send within the initial Radius request packet.
Thanks in advance for your answer

I had a similar problem with the 350 series. I receieved the following information that resolved my issues.
Using RADIUS, You need to use cisco AV-Pair attribute for admin users with following syntex
aironet:admin-capability=write+ident+admin+firmware
Here is the procedure for the admin user you to define the Cisco AV pair Attributes .
a) On acs select the interface configuration and go to the advance option ,
selct "per-user Tacacs/ radius attribute " click on submit .
b)On ACS , Select network configuration ,
1) check if you have configuration >> Radio ( IOS /PIX available ) on the ACS
if not add NAS type Radius IOS/PIX , note that this needed for IOS / PIX attribute
2) After adding IOS/PIX device , select interface configuration >>Radius ( IOS / PIX )
Enable [026/009/001] "cisco av-pair" option , again make sure that you enable
at user and group level click on submit
3) Add a user ( User setup >> ADD/EDIT ) to restrict administrator access control
1) enable and configure cisco 09\001 cisco av-pair using
aironet:admin-capability=write+ident+admin+firmware
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/accsspts/ap350scg/ap350ch8.htm#1073082

Ask the Experts: Single Sign-On with Cisco WebEx Meetings Server, Internet Reverse Proxy, and Enterprise License Manager Solutions

With Arun Kumar
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about Single Sign-On (SSO) with Cisco WebEx Meetings Server (Cisco WMS), Internet Reverse Proxy (IRP), and Enterprise License Manager (ELM) solutions.
SSO standards such as Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 provide secure mechanisms for passing credentials and related information between different websites that have their own authorization and authentication systems. SSO enables simplified user authentication and management.
IRP provides public access, enabling users to host or attend meetings from the Internet and mobile devices. Although IRP is optional, Cisco encourages its use because it provides a better user experience for your mobile workforce.
Example question topics include:
SSO profiles and SAML 2.0 Identity providers (IdPs) supported in Cisco WMS
Basic configuration of IdPs
Interaction between IdPs and Cisco WMS
Difference between the cloud client implementation and Cisco WMS
Meeting access behavior in a split-horizon network topology with SSO
How to enable public access to Cisco WMS
Cisco WMS ELM operations
Cisco WMS ELM compared to other unified communications ELM or standalone ELM and compatibility/inoperability between them
Arun Kumar is a team lead in the San Jose Conferencing Technical Assistance Center. He has over eight years of experience in conferencing technology and specializes in Cisco Unified Meeting Place Express and Cisco WebEx Meeting Server. He joined Cisco in 2010 as an escalation engineer for the Cisco Telepresence group. Before joining Cisco he worked for the UK's third-largest internet service provider Supanet on VoIP technology and the *Nix domain. Kumar holds a master of science degree in computer science from Sikkim Manipal University in India, and he holds CCIE (Voice) and VMware Certified Professional certifications.
Remember to use the rating system to let Arun know if you have received an adequate response.
Arun might not be able to answer each question because of the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Collaboration, Voice, and Video community Other Subjects subcommunity shortly after the event. This event lasts through Monday May 17, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hello Mobile Service,
CWMS and Jabber integrations:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/Windows/9_1/JABW_BK_E4CC9599_00_environment-configuration-guide_chapter_01.html#JABW_TK_SF2ED5E1_00
In above link start from section: Set Up Cisco WebEx Meetings Server on Cisco Unified Presence
then move to section: Add Cisco WebEx Meetings Server to a Profile
Once done, move to section: Specify Conferencing Credentials in the Client side. You will see above server already listed there, just go ahead and enter your username and password (pleae make sure this user already exists on your CWMS) and accept any certificate/s if presented. Jabber Integration is done and you can start testing the same.
Attached CWMS - AFDS integration doc.
Please let me know if any furhter question.
Thanks, Arun

NTP Service on Domain Controller have problem with cisco switch

Hello!
I have Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Domain Controller with NTP services
The windows opertion system clients get NTP time ok.
There are problem with cisco switch, can't get time from NTP.
Can anybody help me to fix problem?
C:\Users\Sysuser>w32tm /query /configuration
[Configuration]
EventLogFlags: 2 (Local)
AnnounceFlags: 5 (Local)
TimeJumpAuditOffset: 28800 (Local)
MinPollInterval: 6 (Local)
MaxPollInterval: 10 (Local)
MaxNegPhaseCorrection: 1800 (Local)
MaxPosPhaseCorrection: 1800 (Local)
MaxAllowedPhaseOffset: 300 (Local)
FrequencyCorrectRate: 4 (Local)
PollAdjustFactor: 5 (Local)
LargePhaseOffset: 50000000 (Local)
SpikeWatchPeriod: 900 (Local)
LocalClockDispersion: 10 (Local)
HoldPeriod: 5 (Local)
PhaseCorrectRate: 7 (Local)
UpdateInterval: 100 (Local)
[TimeProviders]
NtpClient (Local)
DllName: C:\Windows\system32\w32time.dll (Local)
Enabled: 1 (Local)
InputProvider: 1 (Local)
AllowNonstandardModeCombinations: 1 (Local)
ResolvePeerBackoffMinutes: 15 (Policy)
ResolvePeerBackoffMaxTimes: 7 (Policy)
CompatibilityFlags: 2147483648 (Local)
EventLogFlags: 0 (Policy)
LargeSampleSkew: 3 (Local)
SpecialPollInterval: 3600 (Policy)
Type: NTP (Policy)
NtpServer: 10.7.0.4 (Policy)
NtpServer (Local)
DllName: C:\Windows\system32\w32time.dll (Local)
Enabled: 1 (Local)
InputProvider: 0 (Local)
AllowNonstandardModeCombinations: 1 (Local)
VMICTimeProvider (Local)
DllName: C:\Windows\System32\vmictimeprovider.dll (Local)
Enabled: 1 (Local)
InputProvider: 1 (Local)
Cisco config and errors
CISCO1#show ntp ass det
10.7.0.7 configured, insane, invalid, stratum 3
ref ID 10.7.0.4, time D5BC850F.C8400AB2 (15:50:39.782 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 1024, peer poll intvl 1024
root delay 62.50 msec, root disp 11128.04, reach 377, sync dist 11218.796
delay 6.06 msec, offset -467951.1096 msec, dispersion 56.49
precision 2**6, version 3
org time D5BC8864.F79C33A7 (16:04:52.967 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
rcv time D5BC8A38.EBDECB39 (16:12:40.921 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
xmt time D5BC8A38.EA5173BE (16:12:40.915 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
filtdelay = 6.06 5.87 3.23 7.90 6.41 5.17 13.03 3.43
filtoffset = -467951 -467905 -467936 -467885 -467764 -467816 -467707 -467697
filterror = 0.02 15.64 31.27 46.89 62.52 78.14 93.75 93.78

Hi,
>>I gave log on as a service right to this account in Default Domain Controllers Policy but unfortunately it was not enough
Based on your description, we can try to grant this account Allow log on locally
user right in the default domain controller policy to see if it helps.
The policy setting is:
Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Policies\User Rights Assignment\Allow log on locally
Allow log on locally
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756809(v=ws.10).aspx#feedback
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

A problem with a session Access

Hi Olivier,
To connect with Forte while running distributed you must use System DNS
instead of User DNS on the server. The ftexec.exe on your server partition
will be launched by the NodeMgr running as UID SYSTEM. User DNS are not
available to processes running as UID SYSTEM.
Zenon Adamek
Purolator
-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Andrieux [SMTP:oandrieuxaxialog.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 4:59 AM
To: forte-userslists.xpedior.com
Subject: (forte-users) A problem with a session Access
Hi,
We have defined a service object which calls a database Access, when we
use the driver odbc of another station the service object is created and
the application runs. But when we use the driver of the server we have an
exception and this message :
SYSTEM ERROR: Unable to start the partition AxiGecom_CL0_Part1 on any of
the
nodes to which it has been assigned. See the remainder of the error
stack for
more information.
Class: qqsp_ResourceException
Error #: [1602, 593]
Detected at: qqcf_StandardConfig::LoadRemotePartition at 5
Last TOOL statement: method InterfaceManager.PrepareLOM
Error Time: Tue Jul 04 10:50:19
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_cl0_Client",
(partitionId
= EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3f9:0x2, taskId =
[EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3f9:0x2.15]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 149 on node STAT10 in environment axialog.
SYSTEM ERROR: Unable to start partition AxiGecom_CL0_Part1 on node
SERVEUR59B.
Class: qqsp_ErrorDescriptor
Error #: [1602, 592]
Detected at: qqcf_StandardConfig::LoadRemotePartition at 3
Error Time: Tue Jul 04 10:50:19
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_cl0_Client",
(partitionId
= EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3f9:0x2, taskId =
[EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3f9:0x2.15]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 149 on node STAT10 in environment axialog.
SYSTEM ERROR: Attempt to load partition named AxiGecom_CL0_Part1 failed.
Class: qqsp_ResourceException
Error #: [1001, 4]
Detected at: qqrt_ForteExecAgent::LoadPartition at 1
Error Time: Tue Jul 04 10:49:15
Distributed method called: qqrt_ForteExecAgentProxy.LoadPartition!6
(object name Unnamed) from partition "Forte_cl0_Client",
(partitionId =
EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3f9:0x2, taskId =
[EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3f9.4]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 149 on node STAT10 in environment axialog
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition "Forte_Executor",
(partitionId
= EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3de, taskId =
[EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3de.61]) in application
"AxiGecom_cl0", pid 386 on node SERVEUR59B in environment axialog.
SYSTEM ERROR: Failed to create service object
Axigecom_Serveur.Connection_BD.
Class: qqsp_ResourceException
Last TOOL statement: method qqsp_NameList.
Error Time: Tue Jul 04 10:49:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition "Forte_Executor",
(partitionId
= EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3de, taskId =
[EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3de.61]) in application
"AxiGecom_cl0", pid 386 on node SERVEUR59B in environment axialog.
USER ERROR: (This error was converted)
Failed to connect to database: Axigecom, username: Administrateur.
[Microsoft][Gestionnaire de pilotes ODBC] Source de données non
trouvée et
nom
de pilote non spécifié
Class: qqdb_RemoteAccessException with ReasonCode:
DB_ER_DBMSCONNECTION
DBMS SQLSTATE: IM002
Class: qqsp_ErrorDescriptor
Detected at: qqdb_OdbcVendorInfo::DoSQLConnect at 10
Last TOOL statement: method qqsp_NameList.
Error Time: Tue Jul 04 10:49:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition "Forte_Executor",
(partitionId
= EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3de, taskId =
[EB3ED870-274C-11D4-8051-304F7116AA77:0x3de.61]) in application
"AxiGecom_cl0", pid 386 on node SERVEUR59B in environment axialog.
for information, we use a server NT and the stations use Nt, the drivers
DNS users are declared.
We use Access2000, and the version M for Forté
Thanks in advance,
Olivier Andrieux
AXIALOG
France

With Cisco Secure ACS 4.2 User accounts gets locked at first instance of wrong credentials even if configured for 3 attempts

Hello Everybody,
I am working with Cisco Secure ACS 4.2 and it is integrated with Active Directory at a Windows 2008 R2 functional level, user accounts that are set with lockout parameters (3 incorrect attempts) are locked out prematurely after the user enters the wrong credentials just once, the integration is done via LDAP.
I wonder if anybody has any idea why this is happening, because when I connect to a Cisco device or VPN, and type my password wrongly, on the Active Directory I get extra bad password counts.
Thanks in advance and regards....

Hello Scott,
Thanks for your answer. However we checked the ACS logs and it shows that we entered bad credentials just once, but in the Active Directory our account sometimes is blocked because we get at least 2 and sometimes 3 failures. This problem is only presented when we authenticate Cisco devices or through VPN, in normal circumstances, when users enter bad credentials on their computers, it works fine.
Thanks and regards...

There is a problem with this connection's security certificate The remote computer cannot be authenticated due to problems with its security certificate. Security certificate problems might indicate an attempt to fool you or intercept any data you send

Hi,
I have this Windows 2008 R2 on which I installed remoteapp some years ago.
Now the certificate expired and I get the message
"There is a problem with this connection's security certificate
The remote computer cannot be authenticated due to problems with its security certificate.
Security certificate problems might indicate an attempt to fool you or intercept any data you send to the remote computer."
How should I renew the certificate? I already went to certification store and tried to renew certificate with same key but then it says "the request contains nor certificate template information".
Please advise.
J.
J.
Jan Hoedt

Does the computer account have Enroll permission to the certificate template?
From the Server running your CA, run mmc, click File then Add/Remove Snap-in...
Add Certificate Templates and click OK.
Find the certificate template, then right click and select properties. On my CA its call ed RemoteDesktopComputers but might be called something different depending on what what template your certificate is based on.
On the security tab, click Oblect types, check Computers then OK. Enter the Computername and click OK. Then give your computer account Enroll permisssion.
HTH,
JB

Email settings problem - your device encountered a problem with this application's server

Hi,
I'm getting the following message
"your device encountered a problem with this application's server" when I try to add an email in Email settings. This problem is occurring since 15-NOV-2010. I'm using O2 service provider. i've called them and reported this problem. O2 service provider did all possible troubleshooting and they adviced everything is ok on their side. They don't know why am I getting this message.
This is really frustrating and not able to add an email or edit my existing email settings. I did reboot my handheld more than 10 times but no luck. Please can anyone help me to sort this problem out. PLEASE HELP
Regards,
Vimal

Hello there,
I am having the same problem since last 2 days. I have a BB curve 8900 with O2. I called them up today morning. They said that the problem is at their end and some of the customers are getting affected. Luckly, I still can access the setup using webclient.
Hopefuly they will resolve this issue soon.
Cheers,
G

Problem with Cisco Secure Access Server 3.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for