Problem with execution of process flow

Hello! I'm new in OWB, and I hope you will help me.
I started execution of process flow and then connection to my server failed.
The problem is: In Runtime Audit Browser all mappings are complete, but process flow is in "Busy" status. I waited for 24h, and nothing changed. (execution of mappings costed 4h).
what should I do?

Hi,
Use any SQL tool like TOAD and see from the backend if the OWB process is running, if it is still running, kill it. Due to server connection failure the OWB process might have been killed but the Runtime Browser might show it as busy.
Go the Workflow Repository Schema and run the following query:
update wf_item_activity_statuses set activity_status = 'COMPLETE'
where item_type = <Your Process Flow Package Name> and actvity_status != 'COMPLETE'.
This should solve the problem.
Regards
-AP

Similar Messages

While installing adobe creative cloud , getting the following error msg " There seems to be a problem with the download process. Error code:201"

while installing adobe creative cloud , getting the following error msg " There seems to be a problem with the download process. Error code:201"

Creative Cloud Help / Error downloading Creative Cloud applications
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/error-downloading-cc-apps.html

I want to upgrade from Tiger to Snow Leopard on my 2008 MacPro. How do I avoid problems with the upgrade process?

I want to upgrade from Tiger to Snow Leopard on my 2008 MacPro. How do I avoid problems with the upgrade process?

#1 Do a complete bootable backup of your drive before upgrading. That way should anything happen you can revert back to the start and try again.
Make sure you meet Snow Leopard 10.6 Technical Requirements - http://support.apple.com/kb/SP575
You might also want to make sure you don't have software issues with SL:
A Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Application Compatibility List - http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/

Problem with EXPORT IMPORT PROCESS in ApEx 3.1

Hi all:
I'm having a problem with the EXPORT IMPORT PROCESS in ApEx 3.1
When I export an application, and try to import it again. I get this error message
ORA-20001: GET_BLOCK Error. ORA-20001: Execution of the statement was unsuccessful. ORA-06550: line 16, column 28: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol &quot;牃慥整㈰㈯⼴〲㐰〠㨷㐵㈺′䵐&quot; when expecting one of the following: ( - + case mod new not null &lt;an identifier&gt; &lt;a double-quoted delimited-identifier&gt; &lt;a bind variable&gt; avg count current exists max min prior sql stddev sum variance execute forall merge time timestamp in
As a workaround, I check the exported file and found this
wwv_flow_api.create_flow
p_documentation_banner=> 'ç‰ƒæ…¥æ•´â ¤ãˆ°ãˆ¯â¼´ã€²ã °ã€ ã¨·ã µãˆºâ€²äµ
And when I replace with this
p_documentation_banner=> ' ',
I can import the application without the error.
somebody knows why I have to do this??
Thank you all.
Nicolas.

Hi,
This issue seems to have been around for a while:
Re: Error importing file
I've had similar issues and made manual changes to the file to get it to install correctly. In my case, I got:
ORA-20001: GET_BLOCK Error. ORA-20001: Execution of the statement was unsuccessful.<br>ORA-02047: cannot join the distributed transaction in progress<br>begin execute immediate 'alter session set nls_numeric_characters='''||wwv_flow_api.g_nls_numeric_chars||'''';end;There are several suggestions, if you follow that thread, about character sets or reviewing some of the line breaks within pl/sql code within your processes etc. Not sure what would work for you.

Disable particular Mapping Execution in Process flow

Hi,
I am working on OWB 11gR2. I want to disable the execution of a particular mapping in the Process flow. For example, there are 4 mappings A,B,C,D which run one after another,I want to disable the execution of mapping C alone.Is this feature available in OWB?
Please Advice.

Unfortunately this is not handled OutOfTheBox.
You would probably need one or two things extra to do this properly:
-create a table and a procedure/function that holds the mapping names together with a flag.
-use a function operator in the process flow to retrieve a mappings flag from above specified table and store it in a variable in the process flow
-use condtional transitions to route the flow either tru or alongside the mapping. use a reference to the variable used previously.
-make sure the flow can exit properly when you use conditional transitions.

ORA-01017 invalid username/password on execution of process flow

Hi, there are one or two similar issues mentioned in the foum but none are resolved I think.
Basically we have target repositories setup with a single user (not the schema owner) used for the location credentials eg.
REP1_LOCATION pointing to schema REP1 but username OWBRT
REP2_LOCATION pointing to schema REP2 but also username OWBRT
The user OWBRT is defined as a user within OWB and is also defined as a target repository user.
The objects deploy ok without errors but when running any process flow or mapping we get an ORA-01017 invalid username/password.
If the we set the location details to use the schema owner instead of OWBRT mappings and process flows work for that schema.
Is there any special privileges / grants that need to be setup for the username attached to a location in order for this to work ?
We tried giving DBA privileges as a test (which you would think would work), but it didnt.
Thanks
Paul

Hi Paul,
under what user you tried to start processflows/mappings? Did you use configuration with spitted design ant runtime OWB repositories (did you use different DB for design and runtime OWB repositories)?
You should start processflows/mappings under OWB user (created/registered in target DB) and
you need register target locations (database and workflow locations) under this OWB user.
Other variant - you can enable preferences options "Persist location password in metadata" and "Share location password during run time" and then register locations under any OWB user.
I had similar problem and resolved it, also look at this thread
Re: Complex condition don't work with variables in OWB 10.2
Regards,
Oleg

Skipping mapping execution in process flow

I have a process flow that calls multiple mappings. Based on some condition I want a mapping not to execute, E.g. when rerunning the process flow in case of failure. Currently I keep track of mapping execution and store the status in a control table. When a mapping has completed, it updates the status as completed. When I need to rerun, in the SQL of the tables join in the mapping, I have a where clause that returns 0 rows (mapping_completed = N) . So mapping is excuted but no rows added/updated.
The flip side of the approach is when using a complex join specially using views, the SQL takes a long time to run only to return 0 rows. So logic is okay but I want to save time by avoiding the execution of the mapping it self.
I would like to know how others are implementing this scenario.
Regards
Sandeep

Can you not have two different mappings one for running it first time and one which you can run on failure...
In your process flow you can have a param i.e 'F for failure and 'I' for intial and based on this condition you can decide which mapping to invoke and hte path to be followed.

Problem with loading in process chain

Hello all,
I've a problem with my process chain. There are few loading packages that are suppose to start together. Problem is, I guess, not enough processes to start them all together. What happens is that some start loading where others "wait". In SM50 I can see all processes are taken. When the loading of the first pacakages is finished (and I can see processes available in SM50)
I'm expecting the load of the waiting packages would start, but nothing happens and the process chains stucks!
The infopackage load gets a yellow color, and stays that way, no cahnges , and no start of process, can someone help? anyone encountered that before?
Thank you,
Yoav Ophek.

Hi,
Monitor the InfoPack Loads through the T-Code RSMO.
When u select a Job, go to EnvironMent ->tRFC -> In Source System / DataWarehouse, and check if there are any Stuck tRFC's due to which the loads are stuck.
I do not see any other reasons why the Loads would be stuck.
Also check ST22 for any Short Dumps occurred for that time.
SM21 for Job Overview.
And check what else could have been the problem for not loading the InfoPackages.
Hope it helps,
Pradip Parmar

Problem with blocked native processes

My application relies heavily on native processes so that I am trying to implement fallback strategies if a native process doesn't work as expected.
While creating test scenarios I had a problem with handling errors caused directly by the start() method of the NativeProcess class. It throws errors if the target process can’t be accessed or is corrupted. For example if you take an exe file in Windows that works correctly and modify it in a hex editor to corrupt it the following error is thrown:
Error: Error #3219: The NativeProcess could not be started. '%1 is not a valid Win32 application.'
      at flash.desktop::NativeProcess/internalStart()
      at flash.desktop::NativeProcess/start()
If I try to put a try-catch block around the process.start() call something unexpected happens:
The error is cought correctly, but another error is thrown instantly:
Error: Error #1503: A script failed to exit after 30 seconds and was terminated.
      at mx.managers.layoutClasses::PriorityQueue/removeSmallest()[E:\dev\4.x\frameworks\projects\ framework\src\mx\managers\layoutClasses\PriorityQueue.as:238]
      at mx.managers::LayoutManager/validateProperties()[E:\dev\4.x\frameworks\projects\framework\ src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.as:567]
      at mx.managers::LayoutManager/doPhasedInstantiation()[E:\dev\4.x\frameworks\projects\framewo rk\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.as:730]
      at mx.managers::LayoutManager/doPhasedInstantiationCallback()[E:\dev\4.x\frameworks\projects \framework\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.as:1072]
The problem with this error is that I got no idea how to catch or prevent it. Depending on what I do in the catch block there is another error. For example if I try to log the error I get (but sometimes not as instantly as above):
Error: Error #1503: A script failed to exit after 30 seconds and was terminated.
      at mx.logging::Log$/getLogger()[E:\dev\4.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\logging\Log. as:360]
Strange is that the error is fired instantly sometimes not after 30 seconds.
How can I fix this?

In the first case I used a loader to load an error image. In the second case I tried something like:
var logger:ILogger = Log.getLogger("Test");
logger.error("NativeProcessError");
I don't have the exact code at the moment, because I'm not on that computer.

Siebel Problem With a Workflow Process (Pleaseee help REAL PROBLEM)

Well the problem is this i have a designed a workflow who is called by a JOB. Its functionality is to close Service Requests at certain time in the night.
when i simulate a workflow against 2 different Servers it works fine without errors, but when i run a job that calls this WP in those servers i have diferent errors in diferent steps.
In one server i have this kind of error in the last step "Cerrar Requerimiento":
SBL-EXL-00151
SBL-SCR-00141
SBL-BPR-00162
This operation is not allowed when there are no records displayed.
Please execute a query that returns at least one record or add a new record
and in the other i have this error in the 3er step:
SBL-SCR-00141- Problem Running a eScript
in spanish:
Error de tiempo de ejecuci?n de Siebel eScript en el procedimiento 'GetFieldValue' de BusComp [Action]:
Error: SiebelError: Esta operaci?n no se permite cuando no hay registros mostrados. Ejecute una consulta que devuelva por lo menos un registro o agregue un nuevo registro.(SBL-DAT-00215)
(SBL-SCR-00141)
Error al invocar servicio 'BCH EAI Query Utility', m?todo 'UpdateRecord' en el paso 'Cerrar Actividades'.(SBL-BPR-00162)
(error in the Runtime of the Siebel eScript in the process GetFieldValue of Action,This operation is not allowed when there are no records displayed.
Please execute a query that returns at least one record or add a new record
error invoking the service "BCH EAI Query Utility in the Method UpdateRecord in the step "Cerrar Actividades".
If they have the same job and workflow, and BS's active(i use the BS in other workflows and no problem with it) why they give error in diferent steps but they work fine when i use the Business Simulator?, its there a solution?, this can be a problem about the server config or triggers??
thanks a lot!

Hi,
1.Is you're server and youre client using the same version of SRF ?
2.Is the version for workflow in server and the one youre testing in client are the same ?
3. Last but not least this BCH EAI Query Utility search spec is it correct ? Can it able to return at least one record base on you're search spec because I know some business service are required to return at least one record else it will throw error.
Thanks,
Joey Tan , Malaysia

An visual illustration of my problem with V4's "process 2012"

Tonight's sunset taken with a Nikon D700 w/400mm f2.8 lens. Here is the same photo and its virtual copy with very little done to them yet except one is set to 2012 and the other set to 2010. both were left at Adobe Standard, then set to auto tone to get the fairest comparison possible:
2012. Notice the thick yellow transition of mostly one color. While the background looks a little clearer, you must butcher it to death in order to smooth out that ugly band.
And I am pretty sure the shadow color is very slightly "off". I realize that "off" is relative, but I would call this one "off" because it is the newer process. This 2012 color might actually look slightly better, but that's not the point --it should look identical to 2010 "as shot". But I can live with that --the big issue is what is causing the thick ugly band.
2010: Notice that the gradient from bright to dark is much smoother (and easier to work with). This is a much easier start point for developing. I'd say 10 steps max would turn this into a decent image. I have no idea if it could even be done in 2012.
This is the core of my problem with 2012 --the contrast does not work evenly across all brightnesses. They made some things look good at the great expense of others. You cannot adjust one brightness range of a photo without thoroughly trashing another.
2012 appears to work great on perfect auto-matrix-exposed photos of medium dynamic range. Another kind of photo I take are action event photos in uneven arena lighting which are all deliberately underexposed because there is no second chance to capture a winning moment (a blown-out photo will not get used by an exhibitor -- this camera body is quite forgiving of underexposure). These are similarly difficult to work with in 2012 for the same reasons.
How many types of different photos (e.g., action, portrait, landscape, various exposure extremes, etc) was this alpha version tested on? And who do they have evaluating these test results, software engineers or actual artists?
One answer might be to just keep using 2010 --that is not the point I am trying to make. That would mean this product is no longer improving for me, the user.
Any constructive feedback, suggestions, links, history lessons, etc. would be very appreciated.

Hi George,
You're welcome. And, nice view from your backyard!
Yeah, I think it's a common mistake to dive into the shadows or highlights slider before taking a good-enough whack at exposure. And, in my opinion, nothing wrong with doing that, as long as you remember that exposure is a very key adjustment in PV2012, and it should always be revisited before finalizing / fine tuning. It's always good to take a whack at contrast too before hitting highlights and shadows, but in my opinion, it is far less critical to overall tonability than exposure is. Once exposure is set correctly, you can fine tune contrast & highlights/shadows with relative impunity, but it does not work so well to try and set contrast/highlights/shadow and then fine tune exposure.
Also, it's possible that exposure needs to be set higher on average than most newerbies realize, and if it's too bright knock it down with -highlights and -blacks. The opposite may also be true for some people, I don't know. But for me, in Lr3, I was very careful not to set exposure too high for fear of blowing out the highlights (and not being a big fan of Lr3 highlight recovery), *and* I was careful not to set brightness too high to keep from washing out the midtones. Which left fill-light, which I used to brighten, but Lr3 fill would often degrade quality if pushed too hard. So, I often lived with not optimally brightened photos, brightened here or there with a touch of tone curve (and/or locals).
That same technique does not work so well in Lr4, since shadows slider may not have enough kick to it until exposure is boosted - one of the reasons people coming from Lr3 often complain about Lr4 shadows slider, before they've really learned how to set exposure.
In Lr4, highlight recovery is sorta like an improved right-side version of Lr3 fill. i.e. one can "over-brighten", and rely on highlights slider to check it (analogous to "under-brightening" in Lr3 and using fill to compensate). -whites is more akin to Lr3 highlight recovery, only different...
Another thing: I almost always start out editing with the exact same values for -highlights as +shadows. And only during fine tuning, maybe choose to diverge. It's surprising how often having those values equal and opposite can allow one to find the correct exposure, and only then, maybe, skew highlights/shadows, as a fine tuning thing.
Also, for concert photos, or any other situation when there is a big lump of really dark tones that are important, and a small lump of really light tones that are important (e.g. concert lights), and a dearth of midtones, -whites and +blacks sliders can play bigger roles than -highlights and +shadows for "recovery & fill", than in other more "normal" photos.
Lastly, my Lr4 tone curves, more often than not (and more often than in Lr3), have a debrightening shape to them, since sometimes it seems good to set exposure higher than I really want in order to achieve overall "tonability", then drop brightness strategically using the curve (and/or locals).
I'm sure other people do things differently with equal success.
PS - Where should I send the DNG? (you can contact me via PM or my website).
Final thoughts:
The "recipe" I've given here (-blacks, +whites, relatively high exposure & contrast, fairly strong -highlight = +shadows, a modicum of clarity) makes for a very punchy photo with highly detailed shadows, midtones, and highlights. I tend to like such a look on many photos - shooting landscapes and macros, etc... But it can be a bit too intense for portraits or if for whatever reason you prefer a more subtle "natural"/neutral look. One of the awesome things about PV2012 is that you can control the style of look you get. If you want the opposite, then do the opposite, e.g. easy on the -blacks or even use +blacks instead of +shadows, back off on the contrast and exposure so you need less -highlights, use whites = 0 or -whites. You can end up with a very old-school photo kinda look that way - more subtle and gentle, softer...
Rule 5: Enjoy!
Cheers,
Rob

How to combine text with variable in process flow

Hi,
I have created a function that returns the environment that a process flow is running in, Production, Test or Development. I have been able to bind the output of the function into a variable in a process flow and bind the variable to the subject of an email activity. I'd like to go one step more and combine the value of the variable with some text to explain which step in the process flow generated the email. Is there a way to concatenate text to a variable or to add an OWB system variable? I've seen an example where the subject of the email is
"Failed mapping <mapping name>"
but I want my subject to be "PROD Failed mapping <mapping name>" where the "PROD" is from a process flow variable or function return value.
Is this possible?
Thanks
Don Keyes

Hi Don,
you can perform this task with ASSIGN activity.
For example, you have two variable V_ENV_TYPE (with type of environment) and V_TEXT ("Failed mapping <mapping name>"). Define additinal variable V_NEW_TEXT, bind Variable parameter of Assign activity to V_NEW_TEXT variable and define value in Assign activity as
V_ENV_TYPE || ' ' || V_TEXTRegards,
Oleg

Problem with 5800, call processing is too slow.

i have a problem with rejecting calls and recieving as well as dialling. it takes to much time to process. when a caller calls me they hear the dial tone for about 5 seconds then i get the call on my phone.. when i use third party software for automatic rejecting calls, the caller hears the dialtone for like 10 seconds or more then it gets rejected which is really annoying. please help me. is there a solution for this? this is not the network problem coz my sim n rejecting calls on other phones work fine. AND ALSO wen someone calls me i get the call alert like after 10 seconds, its very slow!!

Make sure you have upgraded to 1.1.1 which fixes volume problems.
Note that it will NEVER be as loud as standard cell phones but it should improve the volume so you have no problem hearing it in the car.

Process_order API() with bank account process flow in 11i

Hi all,
I want to know the basic process flow for customer bank account creation and assignment process. I.e I had pass the customer details ,credit card information throw the oe_order_pub.process_order() API .after this processing this api ,how the bank account creation and updation process works? , and it's process flow.
process_order API manual process:
BEGIN
l_header_rec := OE_ORDER_PUB.G_MISS_HEADER_REC;
l_header_rec.header_id := '100192';
l_header_rec.credit_card_holder_name := 'myname';
l_header_rec.credit_card_number := 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx1111';
l_header_rec.credit_card_expiration_date := '1-Jan-28';
l_header_rec.credit_card_code := 'VISA';
l_header_rec.payment_type_code := 'CREDIT_CARD';
l_header_rec.sold_to_org_id := '17118';
l_header_rec.credit_card_approval_code := '34545656676';
l_header_rec.operation := OE_GLOBALS.G_OPR_UPDATE;
OE_ORDER_PUB.process_order (p_api_version_number => 1.0
, p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false
, p_return_values => fnd_api.g_false
, p_action_commit => fnd_api.g_false
, x_return_status => l_return_status
, x_msg_count => l_msg_count
, x_msg_data => l_msg_data
, p_header_rec => l_header_rec
, p_line_tbl => l_line_tbl
, p_action_request_tbl => l_action_request_tbl
x_header_rec => l_header_rec
, x_header_val_rec => x_header_val_rec
, x_Header_Adj_tbl => x_Header_Adj_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_val_tbl => x_Header_Adj_val_tbl
, x_Header_price_Att_tbl => x_Header_price_Att_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_Att_tbl => x_Header_Adj_Att_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_Assoc_tbl => x_Header_Adj_Assoc_tb
............etc );
END;
After this api process , how the bank account will update regarding this value.
Thanks
prabu

Hi all,
I want to know the basic process flow for customer bank account creation and assignment process. I.e I had pass the customer details ,credit card information throw the oe_order_pub.process_order() API .after this processing this api ,how the bank account creation and updation process works? , and it's process flow.
process_order API manual process:
BEGIN
l_header_rec := OE_ORDER_PUB.G_MISS_HEADER_REC;
l_header_rec.header_id := '100192';
l_header_rec.credit_card_holder_name := 'myname';
l_header_rec.credit_card_number := 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx1111';
l_header_rec.credit_card_expiration_date := '1-Jan-28';
l_header_rec.credit_card_code := 'VISA';
l_header_rec.payment_type_code := 'CREDIT_CARD';
l_header_rec.sold_to_org_id := '17118';
l_header_rec.credit_card_approval_code := '34545656676';
l_header_rec.operation := OE_GLOBALS.G_OPR_UPDATE;
OE_ORDER_PUB.process_order (p_api_version_number => 1.0
, p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false
, p_return_values => fnd_api.g_false
, p_action_commit => fnd_api.g_false
, x_return_status => l_return_status
, x_msg_count => l_msg_count
, x_msg_data => l_msg_data
, p_header_rec => l_header_rec
, p_line_tbl => l_line_tbl
, p_action_request_tbl => l_action_request_tbl
x_header_rec => l_header_rec
, x_header_val_rec => x_header_val_rec
, x_Header_Adj_tbl => x_Header_Adj_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_val_tbl => x_Header_Adj_val_tbl
, x_Header_price_Att_tbl => x_Header_price_Att_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_Att_tbl => x_Header_Adj_Att_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_Assoc_tbl => x_Header_Adj_Assoc_tb
............etc );
END;
After this api process , how the bank account will update regarding this value.
Thanks
prabu

Problem with execution

Hi,
I got the following error.
can anybody help with it.
This is expicit block.
1 BEGIN
2 DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.ADD_TABLE_RULES(
3 table_name => 'SOURCESTAT.DEMOTABLE',
4 streams_type => 'capture',
5 streams_name => 'DEMOTABLE_STREAM',
6 queue_name => 'DEMOTABLE_QUEUE',
7 include_dml => True,
8 include_ddl => True);
9* END;
BEGIN
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STREAMS_ADM", line 75
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STREAMS_ADM", line 21
ORA-06512: at line 2
I am not getting where is the exact problem.
please do help me.
Thanks,
Mandar

The underlaying PL/SQL code, DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.ADD_TABLE_RULES, run a SELECT statement that expects a single row. The code usually look something like this:
SELECT * into var FROM table WHERE some_condition
The PL/SQL code/logic expects a single row to be returned by that SELECT statement. However it does not and the PL/SQL Engine raises an exception as it cannot handle multi rows for a single row fetch.
As you're calling Oracle PL/SQL code, I would assume that there is a problem with the parameters that you supplied that caused this error.
Check the manual, and confirm that you are indeed passing valid/sensible parameters to the PL/SQL package.

Problem with execution of process flow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for