Problem with No entry in table T591B for 0015 08 E101

Hi all,
This is our first year using SAP and we're approaching our first Year End and so want to make the E Wage Types available for us in IT0015, E121 is already OK and I can enter data in IT0015 for that WT no problem. I've added WT E101 to the 0015 Additional Payments in the IMG and it shows as being allowed for IT0015, this has created entries in the Permissability, etc. in the IMG and I've updated permisability for the ESG to allow for all ESG / PS, etc. - so all looks fine when I work through the steps for Additional Payments in the IMG, but when I try to save E101 in IT0015 I get a message about 'No entry in table T591B for 0015 08 E101' .
When I look at this table it's called 'WT dependent retroactive accounting trigger' and I've not seen it before despite setting up many Wage Types and I can see E121 is in this table but E101 isn't - but I can't see how I can add or copy anything in this table - there are no options. So I'm assuming this is usually auto updated by creating an entry in another table but I have no idea how to find where and can't find any documentation or other forum messages for this table.
Has anyone else come accross this before or know anything about this table - has anyone else had trouble when wanting to allow E Wage Types to be used for Year End adjustments?
Thanks in advance for any advice anyone can give me
Nyree

Olnly wt configured to be permissibled on a few infotypes (e.g. 0014, 0015, 0267) would need to be configured in V_T591B. The purpose of this is to control whether these wt are allowed to be changed after payroll is already run for the ee.
All you need to do is maintain this entry through view V_T591B - add entry for wt 'E101' for infotype 0015 / country '08'. The indicator (V5591B-ABWRU) can be '' (allow change to wt after proll is run), 'X' (warning if change after proll is run), 'E' (hard-error if change after payroll is run) .
Rgds.

Similar Messages

Problem with text direction in table component for text with two language!

Hi,
I want to display text in table component by binding to the one property,and also the language of this text is farsi that must be in the RTL direction.
so i defined a direction in style of staticText component in the table.
when the text is only in farsi language ,it works correct but when the text has one or more words in english language ,format of the text changed and the words moved in text.
thanks

I can not understand relation between COM and HTML elements .
can you elaborate more ?
All HTML elements are accesable via DOM in browsers.
Indeed to change an element attribute in html files (in browser without server interaction) we use scripts to access DOM tree and then we change the element attribute.
for example when you write
document.forms[1].submit()
you accessing the element using DOM tree.
About Farsi problem , I think there is no solution for this problem , as you may know , when we mix RTL and LTR languages in one element text attribute , we have no control over its appearance.
If i understand your post , you want to show both rtl and ltr in one static Text , which is not doable in simple manner.
At least i can not offer you a simple way to solve this.

No entry in table T512W for key 40 0NPA

Hi ! all
i have some problem in payroll processing.
i have delimited the wage type 0NPA with end date as 26.11.2008. This wage type was a used for EPF calculation. Now there is change in policy with effect from 25.11.2008. This wage type is no longer a part of EPF calculation. So i delimited the same wef from 26.11.2008. Now am trying to process the salary for period 01.04.2009 to 30.04.2009, i am getting an error
" No entry in table T512W for key 40 0NPA for time 30.04.2009 ".
This is an indian salary senario.
Kindly suggest the solution.
regards
Sanjay Petkar

Hi ! partha
Thanks for the reply.
I tried what you said
in SM30 modified V_512W_D for 0NPA and removed tick from cummulation item 11(EPF)
and processed the paybill i am till getting the same error.
I missed to mentioned that, i created the new wage type copy of the 0NPA as NPBS. As NPA is to be paid to employees but this should not be taken for EPF calculation. so i am using the new code for NPA and discontinue 0NPA.
Kindly suggest solution to overcome this problem
Regards
Sanjay Petkar

Error "No entry in table T589A for P" while creating new Infotype

HI,
I've created a new infotype (9605). All the tables, structures, screens etc. have been created using transaction PM01 successfully. But upon execution of Infotype from PA30, the infotype screen is displayed with the following error:
"No entry in table T589A for P"
Any input will be highly appreciated.
Thank you,
Farooq.

Hi Farooq,
Untill and unless the the field PSYST-IOPER is cleared explicitly in the program MP960500 (in PBO modules), this error should not occur.
Also is this error is coming only for 9605 infotype ? Also is any other info availaible in the error message such as entry in table t589a is not available for which value of OPERA (INS, MOD, DEL, LIS etc) ?
Regards,
Shrinivas

No entry in table T001P for key - PT60

Hi Folks,
I´ve got the same error people have reported since some time in this forum, but I didn't find a clear reason or way to fix the issue.
The error "No entry in table T001P for key" is displayed for only 1 employee during time evaluation.I've checked table T001P, IT 0001, IT 0007, and everything seems tom be OK. I have other employee in same Work Schedule and other guy with same information in IT0001, but only this guy has the issue.
In other thread someone put "Make a blank entry in table and this fixes the issue", but it's not clear in how to do it or why this fixes the issue.
Thanks for any help.
(rewarded with points)

HI,
Check IT 2006 and IT0001. A valid record must exist in IT 0001 for the last 2006 record. Check BEGDA of IT2006 and review that is greater than BEGDA and lesser than ENDDA of any valid record in IT0001
If this is not happening, then RPTIME program returns empty values in table T001P and this causes the "no entry in table" message.
Regards,

No entry in table T71ADM10 for key 'X'

Hello,
While uploading data from R/3, I get this error message:
'No entry in table T71ADM10 for key "X"'
But when I look in the R/3 table T71ADM10, then I am able to find entries for the key 'X'.
Additionaly in the BI DataSource Monitor, if I click the 'Maintain PSA' button, all records are shown as updated successfully. No erronous records are returned.
Under the 'Details' tab, 'Extraction' shows error; but 'Transfer' and 'Processing' Steps are shown successful.
Please advice.
Thanks & Regards,
Labanya.

Hello Labanya,
As you telling data is available in PSA . So there is need to do update from fro PSA. So Just select that request number goto RSA1--> PSA. Then find your Request number. Check whether it has with red mark. Then right click on mouse and select "start the update immediately". And check whether you are getting same error or not.
Thanks,
Abha

No entry in table T527X for E

Hi,
The HR IDOCs are ending in error in our production system with the error:
No entry in table T527X for E
Message no. RP301
Diagnosis
The entry values must be stored in table T527X. The " E" value(s) are not in this table.
When the IDOC is reprocessed manually or by the standard program, the IDOC has OK status.
The error just started from today and we do not know as to what is causing this error.
I have checked in the FM that is processing the IDOC and I could not find nay reference to the table T527X or that message number.
Can anyone please help?
Regards,
Archana

The IDOC is being processed by a custom Function module but this program was modified
and the changes were moved to the system last week.
If IDOC was getting processes Successfully till last week, Customization done recently is the Culprit
I am thinking about the complexity of the Standard Function (which almost processes all
types of HR master data and how developer must have managed to write Custom code for all of this.
Quite Complex I think.
The main change was that in some updation BDC is now used to update the screens
directly and then PA41 tcode is being called. Do you think this might cause the issue?
But then it works in reprocessing - strange.
In some places, the standard function module is used (code not changed for this) -HR_MASTER_MAINTAIN -
(i think).
Well what all I can say is track the error message while running the IDOC for first time and
that will only give you the solution.
Regards
Shital

Entries in table BWOM_SETTINGS for PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '

Hello All,
The entries in table BWOM_SETTINGS for PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE ' in our ECC system were as follows originally:
OLTPSOURCE = ''
PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
At that point we started using delta extarctor 0PM_OM_OPA_2 and it had a very poor performance.
SAP asked us to implement note 1040072.
As a result of applying that note, the BWOM_SETTINGS table has 2 entries for PARAM_NAME = OBJSELSIZE.
1. OLTPSOURCE = ''
PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
2. OLTPSOURCE = '0PM_OM_OPA_2'
PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
Things were fine until we added more init selections to another CO extractor, 0CO_OM_OPA_6.
0CO_OM_OPA_6 deltas were taking around 2 hours for original init selections:
Fiscal year / period 2007001 2007012
Fiscal year / period 2008001 2020012
Controlling Area 3000
Recently we added more init selections and now selections are :
Fiscal year / period 2007001 2007012
Fiscal year / period 2007001 2020012
Fiscal year / period 2008001 2020012
Controlling Area 3000
Controlling Area 4000
Controlling Area 5000
The extraction is now taking unacceptably long time, about 15 hours.
I am not sure if it is because adding more inits.
I have a feeling the entries in BWOM_SETTINGS for OBJSELSIZE are incorrect.
According to note 836740 should they be as below?
OLTPSOURCE = '0CO_OM_OPA_6'
PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
OLTPSOURCE = '0PM_OM_OPA_2'
PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE'
PARAM_VALUE= 'X'"
One more question. If we change the BWOM_SETTINGS entries to as above, will that affect other CO extractors?
For instance, we use 0CO_OM_CCA_9 very widely and it runs very fast currently. I just want to make sure we dont mess up its performance by modifying the entries in BWOM_SETTINGS. May be add one more entry in BWOM_SETTINGS for 0CO_OM_CCA_9 too?
Sorry about the lengthy post.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

As stated in [OSS Note 836740 - Delta extractors CO: OBJSELSIZE DataSource specific|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=836740], there should be parameter OBJSELSIZE entries, with a value of X for the following CO DataSources:
0CO_OM_CCA_9
0CO_OM_OPA_6
0CO_OM_ABC_7
0CO_OM_WBS_6
0CO_OM_NAE_2
0CO_OM_NTW_2
0OC_OM_NWA_2
The independent entry, where the DataSource is blank, should also be prsent for the OBJSELSIZE parameter with a value of X. [OSS Note 1040072 - 0PM_OM_OPA_2: Poor performance|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1040072] shows that it's also needed for the 0PM_OM_OPA_2 DataSource.
Your entries for 0CO_OM_OPA6 and 0PM_OM_OPA_2 are correct. You should add 0CO_OM_CCA_9 and any other DataSource in the list above. If they're not listed, they are supposed to be taken care of by the independent entry (DataSource is blank).

Problems with retrieving data from tables with 240 and more records

Hi,
I've been connecting to Oracle 11g Server (not sure exact version) using Oracle 10.1.0 Client and O10 Oracle 10g driver. Everything was ok.
I installed Oracle 11.2.0 Client and I started to have problems with retrieving data from tables.
First I used the same connection string, driver and so on (O10 Oracle 10g) then I tried ORA Oracle but with no luck. The result is like this:
I'm able to connect to database. I'm able to retrieve data but from small tables (e.g. with 110 records it works perfectly using both O10 and ORA drivers). When I try to retrieve data from tables with like 240 and more records retrieval simply hangs (nothing happens at all - no error, no timeout). Application seems to hang forever.
I'm using Powerbuilder to connect to Database (either PB10.5 using O10 driver or PB12 using ORA driver). I used DBTrace, so I see that query hangs on the first FETCH.
So for the retrievals that hang I have something like:
(3260008): BIND SELECT OUTPUT BUFFER (DataWindow):(DBI_SELBIND) (0.186 MS / 18978.709 MS)
(3260008): ,len=160,type=DECIMAL,pbt=4,dbt=0,ct=0,prec=0,scale=0
(3260008): ,len=160,type=DECIMAL,pbt=4,dbt=0,ct=0,prec=0,scale=1
(3260008): ,len=160,type=DECIMAL,pbt=4,dbt=0,ct=0,prec=0,scale=0
(3260008): EXECUTE:(DBI_DW_EXECUTE) (192.982 MS / 19171.691 MS)
(3260008): FETCH NEXT:(DBI_FETCHNEXT)
and this is the last line,
while for retrievals that end, I have FETCH producing time, data in buffer and moving to the next Fetch until all data is retrieved
On the side note, I have no problems with retrieving data either by SQL Developer or DbVisualizer.
Problems started when I installed 11.2.0 Client. Even if I want to use 10.0.1 Client, the same problem occurs. So I guess something from 11.2.0 overrides 10.0.1 settings.
I will appreciate any comments/hints/help.
Thank you very much.

pgoel wrote:
I've been connecting to Oracle 11g Server (not sure exact version) using Oracle 10.1.0 Client and O10 Oracle 10g driver. Everything was ok.Earlier (before installing new stuff) did you ever try retrieving data from big tables (like 240 and more records), if yes, was it working?Yes, with Oracle 10g client (before installing 11g) I was able to retrieve any data, either it was 10k+ records or 100 records. Installing 11g client changed something that even using old 10g client (which I still have installed) fails to work. The same problem occur no matter I'm using 10g or 11g client now. Powerbuilder hangs on retrieving tables with more than like 240 records.
Thanks.

Problem with 0014 entry

Hi,
I am having some problem with the entry in 0014. system is not permitting me to enter payment model and interval details
I have defined payment model and periodicity in IMG and also i have defined MODDE. But when i am entering the details (payment model, payment period and intervel) in 0014 it is not accepting.
I appreciate your support.
I have checked t512z and the permissibility is for several times.
as per the requirement, we have to pay x amount to employees on quarterly basis.
Thanks
Yogi

Hi,
I have found the solutioin.
Thanks
Yogi

No entry in table T554C for key 40 01 01 for time 26.08.2009

Hello experts,
I am simulating payroll, after entering an absence,
Its giving error like - No entry in table T554C for key 40 01 01 for time 26.08.2009
I have checked this table and there is entry for the respective absence.
Why still that error is coming ?
Will you please help me out to simulate my payroll with absence valuation ?
Thanks and Regards
Jaydeep Jadhav

Hello Revathi,
thanks for replying me ...
yes ... i am using -ve time management.
my payroll schema name is ZN00
tc00 is commented already
system stops at Processing of time data PAB edit absence data
Thanks in advance.
Jaydeep Jadhav
Edited by: Jaysaphr on Aug 26, 2009 5:14 PM

"No entry in table T589A for P" for HR Infotype

Hi,
Does anyone knows why do I encounter this msg "No entry in table T589A for P" when I run HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION for a specific customised Infotype. I am actually doing a Update operation that I encountered this problem.
Hope to hear from u soon. Will Award points for solution provided.
Lawrence Boey

Hi lawrence,
1. For the paramter OPERATION
in the FM,
pass valid values like
DIS INS MOD
2. For update, the value is MOD
3. All valid values are contained in table T589A.
regards,
amit m.

System error -no entry in table T093 for the chart of depreciation or ccode

When checking Depreciation Areas of Company Codes in overview for experts (transaction SPRO) I first get a warning message inconsistent rounding entries were corrected.
After saving once in the maintenance transaction (as recommended in the help text) I get the following system error: there is no entry in table T093 for the chart of depreciation or company code. I checked table T093 and all entries are in there!
What else I have to correct?
Regards
Cordula Speh

hi ,
yours is customizing problem only, check all steps once again in customizing. T093 is initial customizing for asset accounting. just go through below things and check based on this order all customizing.
1.     Copy Reference Chart of Accounts Depreciation / Depreciation Areas.
2.     Specify Description of Chart of Depreciation (COD).
3.     Copy / Delete Depreciation Areas.
4.     Creation of 0 Tax Codes for Non-Taxable Transaction.
5.     Assign Tax Codes for Non-Taxable Transactions.
6.     Assign COD to Company Code.
7.     Specify Account Determination.
8.     Create Screen Layout Rules.
9.     Define Number Intervals.
check one by one and if you find anything missedout do it, i think max you prblm solve, if not give some more details about your problem.
thanks and regards
vk.

Very big problem with JSF about FORM and "id=" for HTML form's elements and

I have discovered a very big problem with JSF about FORM and "id=" for HTML form's elements and java instruction "request.getParameterNames()".
Suppose you have something like this, to render some datas form a Java Beans :
<h:dataTable value="#{TablesDb2Bean.myDataDb2ListSelection}" var="current" border="2" width="50%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" style="text-align: center">
<h:column>
<f:facet name="header">
<h:outputText value="Name"/>
</f:facet>
<h:outputText id="nameTableDb2" value="#{current.db2_name_table}"/>
</h:column>
</h:dataTable>
Everything works fine...
Suppose you want to get the name/value pairs for id="nameTableDb2" and #{current.db2_name_table} to process them in a servlet. Here is the HTML generated :
<td><span <span class="attribute-name">id=<span class="attribute-value">"j_id_jsp_1715189495_22:0:nameTableDb2">my-table-db2-xxxxx</span></td>
You think you can use the java instructions :
Enumeration NamesParam = request.getParameterNames();
while (NomsParam.hasMoreElements()) {
String NameParam = (String) NamesParam.nextElement();
out.println("<h4>"++NameParam+ "+</h4>);
YOU ARE WRONG : request.getParameterNames() wants the syntax *name="nameTableDb2" but JSF must use id="nameTableDb2" for "<h:outputText"... So, you can't process datas in a FORM generated with JSF in a Servlet ! Perhaps I have made an error, but really, I wonder which ?
Edited by: ungars on Jul 18, 2010 12:43 AM
Edited by: ungars on Jul 18, 2010 12:45 AM

While I certainly appreciate ejb's helpful responses, this thread shows up a difference in perspective between how I read the forum and how others do. Author ejb is correct in advising you to stay inside JSF for form processing if form processing is what you want to do.
However, I detect another aspect to this post which reminds me of something Marc Andreesen once said when he was trying to get Netscape off the ground: "there's no such thing as bad HTML."
In this case, I interpret ungar's request as a new feature request. Can I phrase it like this?
"Wouldn't it be nice if I could render my nice form with JSF but, in certain cases, when I REALLY know what I'm doing" just post out to a separate servlet? I know that in this case I'll be missing out on all the nice validation, conversion, l10n, i18n, ajax, portlet and other features provided by JSF".
If this is the case, because it really misses the point of JSF, we don't allow it, but we do have an issue filed for it
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=127
If you can't wait for it to be fixed, you could decorate the FormRenderer to fix what you want.
I have an example in my JSF book that shows how to do this decoration. http://bit.ly/edburnsjsf2
Ed

PM01 - Custom Infotype "No entry in table T589A for P"

I created a custom PA Infotype with PM01 and now get error "No entry in table T589A for P". T589A is a table with function codes e.g. DIS, INS, LIS and also "P" & "Z". T589A is read when the dynamic PF-STATUS processing is done for Infotypes. I'm trying to do an insert with INS, but as the program tries to read from T589A, field PSYST-IOPER is blank. Any advice? Please assist. Thanks, Adrian

Just had to regenerate

Problem with No entry in table T591B for 0015 08 E101

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for