Problem with populating a fact table from dimension tables

my aim is there are 5 dimensional tables that are created
Student->s_id primary key,upn(unique pupil no),name
Grade->g_id primary key,grade,exam_level,values
Subject->sb_id primary key,subjectid,subname
School->sc_id primary key,schoolno,school_name
year->y_id primary key,year(like 2008)
s_id,g_id,sb_id,sc_id,y_id are sequences
select * from student;
S_ID UPN FNAME COMMONNAME GENDER DOB
==============================
9062 1027 MELISSA ANNE       f  13-OCT-81
9000 rows selected
select * from grade;
      G_ID GRADE      E_LEVEL         VALUE
        73 A          a                 120
        74 B          a                 100
        75 C          a                  80
        76 D          a                  60
        77 E          a                  40
        78 F          a                  20
        79 U          a                   0
        80 X          a                   0
18 rows selectedThese are basically the dimensional views
Now according to the specification given, need to create a fact table as facts_table which contains all the dim tables primary keys as foreign keys in it.
The problem is when i say,I am going to consider a smaller example than the actual no of dimension tables 5 lets say there are 2 dim tables student,grade with s_id,g_id as p key.
create materialized view facts_table(s_id,g_id)
as
select  s.s_id,g.g_id
from   (select distinct s_id from student)s
,         (select distinct g_id from grade)gThis results in massive duplication as there is no join between the two tables.But basically there are no common things between the two tables to join,how to solve it?
Consider it when i do it for 5 tables the amount of duplication being involved, thats why there is not enough tablespace.
I was hoping if there is no other way then create a fact table with just one column initially
create materialized view facts_table(s_id)
as
select s_id
from student;then
alter materialized view facts_table add column g_id number;Then populate this g_id column by fetching all the g_id values from the grade table using some sort of loop even though we should not use pl/sql i dont know if this works?
Any suggestions.

Basically your quite right to say that without any logical common columns between the dimension tables it will produce results that every student studied every sibject and got every grade and its very rubbish,
I am confused at to whether the dimension tables can contain duplicated columns i.e column like upn(unique pupil no) i will also copy in another table so that when writing queries a join can be placed. i dont know whether thats right
These are the required queries from the star schema
Design a conformed star schema which will support the following queries:
a. For each year give the actual number of students entered for at A-level in the whole country / in each LEA / in each school.
b. For each A-level subject, and for each year, give the percentage of students who gained each grade.
c. For the most recent 3 years, show the 5 most popular A-level subjects in that year over the whole country (measure popularity as the number of entries for that subject as a percentage of the total number of exam entries).
I written the queries earlier based on dimesnion tables which were highly duplicated they were like
student
=======
upn
school
school
======
school(this column substr gives lea,school and the whole is country)
id(id of school)
student_group
=============
upn(unique pupil no)
gid(group id)
grade
year_col
========
year
sid(subject id)
gid(group id)
exam_level
id(school id)
grades_list
===========
exam_level
grade
value
subject
========
sid
subject
compulsory
These were the dimension table si created earlier and as you can see many columns are duplicated in other tables like upn and this structure effectively gets the data out of the schema as there are common column upon which we can link
But a collegue suggested that these dimension tables are wrong and they should not be this way and should not contain dupliated columns.
select      distinct count(s.upn) as st_count
,     y.year
,     c.sn
from      student_info s
,     student_group sg
,     year_col y
,     subject sb
,     grades_list g
,     country c
where      s.upn=sg.upn
and     sb.sid=y.sid
and     sg.gid=y.gid
and     c.id=y.id
and     c.id=s.school
and      y.exam_lev=g.exam_level
and      g.exam_level='a'
group by y.year,c.sn
order by y.year;This is the code for the 1st query
I am confused now which structure is right.Are my earlier dimension tables which i am describing here or the new dimension tables which i explained above are right.
If what i am describing now is right i mean the dimension tables and the columns are allright then i just need to create a fact table with foreign keys of all the dimension tables.

Similar Messages

  • Fact Table and Dimension Tables

    Hi Experts, I'm creating custom InfoCubes for data coming from non-SAP source systems. I have two InfoCubes. Tha data is coming from like 10 tables. I have 10 DataSources created fo this and the data will be consolidated in Standard DSO before it will flow into 2 InfoCubes.
    Now client wants to know before how much data will be there in InfoCubes in Fact table nad Dimension tables in both the InfoCubes. I have the total size of all the 10 tables from the sources given to me by the DBA. I wan not sure how I can convert that info for Fact table and Dimension table as I have not yet created these Infocubes.
    Please help me with this on how I should address this.

    hi,
    The exact data will be hard to give however you can reach at a round figure in your case.
    You are consolidating the data from the tables that means that there is relation between the tables. Arrive at a rough figure based on the relation and the activity you are performing while consolidating the data of the tables.
    For example, let us say we want to combine data for sales order and deliveries in a DSO.
    Let Sales order has 1000 records and Delivery has 2000 records. Both the tables have a common link (Sales Order).In DSO you are combining the data that means the data will be at the most granular level consist of Delivery data, so the maximum no of records which the consolidated DSO can have is 2000.
    regards,
    Arvind.

  • Reg: Fact table and Dimension table in Data Warehousing -

    Hi Experts,
    I'm not exactly getting the difference between the criteria which decide how to create a Fact table and Dimension table.
    This link http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9362854/database-fact-table-and-dimension-table states :
    Fact table contains data that can be aggregate.
    Measures are aggregated data expressions (e. Sum of costs, Count of calls, ...)
    Dimension contains data that is use to generate groups and filters.
    This's fine but how does one decide which columns to consider for Fact table and which columns for Dimension table?
    Any help is much appreciated.
    Pardon me if this's not the correct place for this question. My first question in the new forum.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ranit Biswas

    ranitB wrote:
    But my main doubt was - what is the criteria to differentiate between columns for Fact tables and Dimension tables? How can one decide upon the design?
    Columns of a fact table will often be 'scalar' attributes of the 'fact' data item. A dimension table will often be 'compound' attributes of a 'fact'.
    Consider employee information. The EMPLOYEE table can be a fact table. It might have scalar attribute columns such as: DATE_HIRED, STATUS, EMPLOYEE_ID, and so on.
    Other related information that can't be specified as a single attribute value would often be stored in a 'dimension' table: ADDRESS, PHONE_NUMBER.
    Each address requires several columns to define it: ADDRESS1, ADDRESS2, CITY, STATE, ZIP, COUNTRY. And an employee might have several addresses: WORK_ADDRESS, HOME_ADDRESS. That address info would be stored in a 'dimension' table and only the primary key value of the address record would be stored in the EMPLOYEE 'fact' table.
    Same with PHONE_NUMBER. Several columns are required to define a phone number and each employee might have several of them. The dimension tables are used to help 'normalize' the data in the employee 'fact' table.
    And that EMPLOYEE table might also be a DIMENSION table for other FACT tables. A DEVELOPER table might have an EMPLOYEE_ID column with a value that points to a 'dimension' row in the EMPLOYEE dimension table.

  • To find the size of the fact table and dimension table

    Hi experts,
    Can anyone plz tell me if i want to find size of the fact table and size of the dimension table to find cardinality and line item do we first build statistics then find size by transaction DB02 or any other method we have?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi ,
    Please go to Tcode DB02 >Space>Table and Indexes.Give your table name or pattern (like /BIC/F* for gettinf all the Fact tables)
    .This will give you sizes of all the table.
    Also if you want to get list like TOP 30 Fact tables and Dimension Table.Please use TCode ST14, this will give a desired output with all the required details.
    -Vikram

  • Problem with:  select 'c' as X from dual

    Problem with 'select 'c' as X from dual'
    I get 2 different results when I execute the above with SQLPlus (or java) depending on the instance I am connected to. For one instance the result is a single character and for the other the character is padded with blanks to 32 chars in the SQLPlus window (and java). Does anyone know what database setting causes this to happen? Is it a version issue ?
    Test #1: Oracle 9.2.0.6 - SQLPlus result is padded with blanks
    SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Dec 10 09:27:58 2007
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    Connected to:
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning option
    JServer Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    SQL> select 'c' as X from dual;
    X
    c
    SQL>
    Test #2 Oracle 9.2.0.1 SQLPlus result is a single character.
    SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Dec 10 09:29:27 2007
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    Connected to:
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
    JServer Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
    SQL> select 'c' as X from dual;
    X
    c
    SQL>

    Using 9.2.0.6 On AIX 5.2 I get the single byte result:
    UT1 > select 'c' as X from dual;
    X
    c
    If the databases are on different Oracle Homes you may want to check the sqlplus global logon files for any set commands.
    If you executed the two sql statements from different OS directories you may also want to check your sqlpath for sqlplus .logon files.
    Try issueing clear columns and repeating the statement. Are the results the same?
    HTH -- Mark D Powell --

  • Fact table and dimension table

    what is the difference b/w fact table and dimension table

    A fact table contains numeric values and also contain composite key(i.e collection of foreign key) e.g.. sales and profit. Typically has two types of columns: those that contain facts and those that are foreign keys to dimension  tables.
    Dimension tables, also known as lookup or reference tables, contain the relatively static data in the warehouse. It contains character values E.g Customer_name,Customer_city.
    Dimension tables store the information you normally use to contain queries. Dimension tables are usually textual and descriptive and you can use them as the row headers of the result set.
    Rachna

  • Sizeof fact table and dimension table

    Hi Experts ,
    Can you tell me how to measure the size of dimension table and fact tables and how to find the ratio of size of dimension table to the size of fact table.
    Thanks in advance,
    Thanks and Regards
    Ram Kommineni

    Hi,
    The ratio of size of fact table to dimension table is ideally should be 10:1. That means the size of the dimension tables should be 10% of the size of the fact table. This serves better in terms of performance.
    Whenever you load any cube, you can easily find out the number of records in fact table (E and F table) and the dimension tables. Based on that statistics you can determine the ratio of size in fact and dimension tables.
    Hope this info helps you.
    Regards,
    Yogesh.

  • Where can we see Fact Table And Dimension Table in DataWarehouse Workbench?

    Hai Experts
    where can we see Fact Table And Dimension Table in DataWarehouse Workbench?
    Best Regards
    nvnkmr12

    Hi
    Refer the link below and you will get a comprehensive explanation of how data is stored and modeled in BI. If explains fact table, dimension table, SID table, P and Q , X and Y tables.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/6ce7b0a4-0b01-0010-52ac-a6e813c35a84
    Cheers
    Umesh

  • Two fact and one dimension table

    Hi folks
    i am new to this field ( 3 months ), my TL has given me one task i have to finish it up today itself, Can anyone one give me some idea how to implement
    req. The req is
    1. there are 2 fact and one dimension table is there, i have to create reports on Quaterly and monthly basis by using one dimension table.
    Can any one tell me what all are the steps in need to follow
    2.What is standalone and integrated systems?
    Regards
    Reddy

    Hi
    If u r having mapping keys for quarter level n monthly level then create a Alias for the dimension table.Use the original dim table for quarter level mapping and the alias dim for monthly level.
    Thanks
    Don

  • Problem with mapping the Entity beans onto database tables

    Hi,
    I got a problem with mapping the Entity beans onto database tables. Here are what I did:
    First Step:
    asant capture-schema
    Second Step:
    capture-schema -driver com.pointbase.jdbc.jdbcUniversalDriver -dburl jdbc:pointbase:server://localhost/sun-appserv-samples -username pbPublic -password pbpublic -table APPLICANT -table APPLICANTSKILL -table CUSTOMER -table LOCATION -table job -table JOBSKILL -table SKILL -out build/agency.dbschema
    The first step was fine. But, in the second step, I got the error message as follow:
    using dburl:jdbc:pointbase:server://localhost/sun-appserv-samples
    using username:pbPublic
    using password:pbpublic
    using driver:com.pointbase.jdbc.jdbcUniversalDriver
    using schemaname:null
    using output file:build/agency.dbschema
    JDO71100: Failed to find a class. Verify that the class is available on your CLASSPATH
    java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.pointbase.jdbc.jdbcUniversalDriver
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:199)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:187)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:289)
    at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:274)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:235)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:302)
    at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
    at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:141)
    at com.sun.forte4j.modules.dbmodel.jdbcimpl.ConnectionProvider.<init>(Co
    nnectionProvider.java:38)
    at com.sun.jdo.api.persistence.mapping.ejb.CaptureSchema.main(CaptureSch
    ema.java:130)
    at com.sun.jdo.spi.persistence.support.ejb.util.CaptureSchemaWrapper.mai
    n(CaptureSchemaWrapper.java:29)
    Thanks for your help!

    You need to add the pbclient.jar or some similar name like that, in the CalssPath.

  • OneKey Recovery 6.0. Problem with back up operating system from recovery cd'ies

    Hello, i have problem with back up operating system from recovery cdies.
    When i acceped start button to backup partition system i get an alert "space not enough"
    I had linux before and i whant change it to windows back. i deleted all ext partitions. I have all unlocated space.I shouldnt have problems.
    Please help me

    I would use something like Partition Magic or Acronis Disk Director to first create a FAT32 partion for your C: Drive where your OS will go and be sure to leave 10GB or so unallocated for the secondary FAT32 Partition where your "factory image" will go. 
    You then create a Logical Drive with the unallocated space and make it hidden (PM or ADD will do this).   Install your OS (preferably Windows XP if you want less problems) and then after you have setup everything the way you want (drivers, applications, etc), then use Acronis True Image to create your "factory restore" image on the hidden partition and activate the Startup Recovery Manager.
    This is the way I do it and it works like a charm!

  • Oracle Data Compression on SID tables and Dimension Tables

    Hello Community,
    We have had great success with Oracle compression on ODS tables that are no longer loaded.
    We'd now like to move on to other types of BW tables that are very large.
    OSS Note 701235 provides answers to questions concerning the possible use of Oracle compression together with SAP BW.
    But the Note does not give suggestions for (or against) Oracle compression on SID tables or Dimension tables.
    I believe both table types would exhibit the same behaviour : mostly inserts of new SID IDs and new DIM IDs, but few updates to existing SID or Dimension records.  If this is true, then both are good candidates for oracle compression. 
    Do you also agree that this is the typical behaviour for SID tables and dimension tables ?  And that these types of tables are good candidates for Oracle compression in a large BW system ?
    Thanks kindly!
    Keith Helfrich

    Hi all,
    Although this is an old thread I stumbled on during my own investigations I can provide some answers to your questions.
    Table candidates for compression are found by these criteria
           - Table size big enough?
           - Long lifetime of object planned ?
          - No or only rare structural changes for the table   ?
          - u201EUpdateu201C rate low : is your data mostly kind of u201Cread onlyu201D ?
    --               for the wideley used rolling window partition techniques of
                      tables in BW this is not a problem: mostly INSERTu2019s in the
                     current partition not affecting other partitions
    BW tables that can benefit from compression (see SAP notes 105047,701235)
           - PSA tables with data that must be saved for a longer time
           - ODS change log (no Updates of old data, only Inserts of new data)
           - u201Ehistoricalu201C cubes wich get no changes in table structure anymore
    Limitations
             - normal Insert or Update statements are stored ALWAYS in uncompressed
                    format and must be compressed separately ( <= Oracle10g )
             - Slight CPU overhead of compression, butu2026
             --      CPU consumption is more than compensated by doing less I/O as
                   for Bulk loads or parallel processing
             --      SAP BW transformations took a significant amount of CPU for
                       overall load-time into cubes caused by the application server not
                       the database
              - Table must have not more than 255 fields
              - Adding columns with an initial value or dropping columns require
                   uncompression of the complete table (strongest limitation)
    Consider all this above and you can decide that tables that going through UPDATE's are
    not good candidates for compression or tables that can change it's structure (like
    Fact- or DIM tables) .
    Now, my questions to you:
    Wich Oracle version do you use?
    Wich tool do you use for  Oracle compression?
    BRspace (can you give an example ?)
    ALTER ... MOVE COMPRESS
    bye
    yk

  • Can not insert or update [TABLE] from internal table in method

    I've faced a problem with OO abap. I've tried to insert into [ TABLE ] from internal table, but i've got error msg after i compiled.
    "An explicit work area is necessary in the OO context. Use "INSERT wa INTO [TABLE] itab""
    After  i changed to loop in work area and INSERT INTO  [TABLE] VALUES gw_data., everything is fine, can compile and run.
    This is error code.
      METHOD set_data_to_table.
        REFRESH gi_data.
        CLEAR gi_data.
        IF gi_file[] IS NOT INITIAL.
    * Set data for modify table
          LOOP AT gi_file INTO gw_file.
            MOVE-CORRESPONDING gw_file TO gw_data.
            me->conversion_input( EXPORTING im_vendor = gw_data-vendor
                                  CHANGING  ch_vendor = gw_data-vendor ).
            APPEND gw_data TO gi_data.
          ENDLOOP.
          INSERT [TABLE] FROM TABLE gi_data.
    *      LOOP AT gi_data INTO gw_data.
    *        INSERT INTO  [TABLE] VALUES gw_data.
    *        IF sy-subrc = 0.
    *          COMMIT WORK.
    *        ELSE.
    *          ROLLBACK WORK.
    *        ENDIF.
    *      ENDLOOP.
        ELSE.
          MESSAGE 'No data found' TYPE 'I'.
        ENDIF.
      ENDMETHOD.                    "set_data_to_table

    Hi Matthew,
    I think there is no difference in database insert between OO and non-OO.
    The correct syntax according to ECC600 online documentation is
    [Inserting Several Lines|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/fc/eb3a6d358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm]
    To insert several lines into a database table, use the following:
    INSERT target FROM TABLE itab \[ACCEPTING DUPLICATE KEYS].
    This writes all lines of the internal table itabto the database table in one single operation. If one or more lines cannot be inserted because the database already contains a line with the same primary key, a runtime error occurs. You can prevent the runtime error occurring by using the addition ACCEPTING DUPLICATE KEYS.
    Whenever you want to insert more than one line into a database table, it is more efficient to work with an internal table than to insert the lines one by one.
    I think the syntax
    INSERT my_dbtable FROM TABLE gi_data.
    should work, your suggestion may lead to syntax error.
    Regards,
    Clemens

  • Missing most detailed table for dimension tables

    Hi ,
    I am getting this following error
    Business Model Core:
    [nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables: [Dim - Customer,Dim - Account Hierarchy,Dim - Account Region Hierarchy,Fact - Fins - Period Days Count].
    [nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area Core.
    I got this error when I tried to configure # of Elapsed Days and # of Cumulative Elapsed Days by following way-
    1. Using the Administration Tool, open OracleBIAnalyticsApps.rpd.
    Configuration Steps for Controlling Your Data Set
    Configuring Oracle Financial Analytics 5-51
    The OracleBIAnalyticsApps.rpd file is located at:
    ORACLE_INSTANCE\bifoundation\OracleBIServerComponent\coreapplication_
    obisn\repository
    2. In the Business Model and Mapping layer, go the logical table Fact - Fins - Period
    Days Count.
    3. Under Sources, select the Fact_W_DAY_D_PSFT logical table source.
    4. Clear the Disabled option in the General tab and click OK.
    5. Open the other two logical table sources, Fact_W_DAY_D_ORA and Fact_W_
    DAY_D_PSFT, and select the Disabled option.
    6. Add the "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count" and "Dim - Company" logical tables to
    the Business Model Diagram. To do so, right-click the objects and select Business
    Model Diagram, Selected Tables Only.
    7. In the Business Model Diagram, create a new logical join from "Dim - Company"
    to "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count." The direction of the foreign key should be
    from the "Dim - Company" logical table to the "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count"
    table. For example, on a (0,1):N cardinality join, "Dim - Company" will be on the
    (0/1) side and "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count" will be on the N side.
    8. Under the Fact - Fins - Period Days Count logical table, open the "# of Elapsed
    Days" and "# of Cumulative Elapsed Days" metrics, one at a time.
    9. Go to the Levels tab. For the Company dimension, the Logical Level is set to All.
    Click the X button to remove it. Repeat until the Company dimension does not
    have a Logical Level setting.
    10. Make sure to check Global Consistency to ensure there are no errors, and then
    save the RPD file.
    Please help me to resolve.
    Thanks,
    Soumitro

    Could you let me know how you resolved this. I am facing the same.

  • "Missing most detailed table for dimension tables" eror when I run the Global Consistency check

    ERRORS:
    Business Model DAC Measures:
    [nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables: [D_DETAILS,D_EXECUTION_PLAN,D_TASK].
    [nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area DAC Measures.
    I am also attaching my Business Model layer for easy understanding. I have a fact table and several Dimension table. I got this error only after creating the following hierarchies:
    Execution Plan -> Tasks -> Details
    Start Date Time Hierarchy
    End Date Time Hierarchy
    Is there a solution for this problem? Thanks in advance!

    Yes ! My Task Hierarchy has 3 dimension tables that form a hierarchy :Execution Plan -> Tasks -> Detail
    All the 3 levels in the hierarchy are 3 different dimension tables.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Text data is not displaying at Report level for an Infoobject Item name

    Hi All, Texts data is maintained at Info object level but text information is not displaying at Report level for an object.  I have set the property at query level as "Text", but at report level it is displaying key values of the object, not displayi

  • IDoc to Flat File in SAP PI 7.11

    Hi Experts, I am working on PI 7.11 and I have scenario from Idoc to Flat File. Idoc is posted from source side R/3 system.My requirement is "With out Converting the Idoc structure to XML Structure  i want to send the data to Target system i.e. File

  • Looking for screen to change Supplier User Registr.. workflow process name

    Hi, The question relates to Supplier User Management. Does anybody know if there is a page where you can pickup the workflow (the shipped one has internal name POS_REG) process name for supplier registration? Thank you. Anatoliy

  • Keeping Blank line in Table

    I have a simple rtf layout with a table on it. Sometimes my value in 'LINE2' will be blank. When it's blank, it moves LINE3 directly under LINE1. How can preserve the space so it would print a blank line in LINE2 and have LINE3 underneath it? <for ea

  • Cannot Change Timezone/Time at All under GNOME Desktop

    Just as the title says, im having trouble changing the timezone in gnome, when i go to date & time settings, it doesnt let you do anything and the unlock button in the top right corner fails to ask for a password, rather it doesnt do anything. If you