Problems with colour profiles

Hi,
Since I reinstalled Win7 and Photoshop, every time I open a document it is in the "working RGB" colour profile, which makes the document whitish. So I have to assign another profile, namely the one associated with my monitor.
But I have to do this every time I open a document, even if it's the same document !
Is there a way to tell Photoshop that I want him to open all documents with my monitor's profile ?

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
zibizibi wrote:
I would love to recalibrate my monitor but what does that mean exactly ?
Generally this involves the purchase of a separate mesurement device to measure the colors of your monitor, and attendant software to create a profile and put it in the right place for your color-managed applications to use.
There are upsides and downsides to doing this (for example, a calibrated/profiled system will almost always show the same image differently in different applications, depending on which is color-managed).  You should try to read up on Color Management and really understand what it's all about - and weigh that against your goals.
Notably Windows ships with sRGB as the default monitor profile, probably because this is a minimum common denominator setup and it does provide somewhat more consistency.  It may not be as valid as it used to be, as modern monitor capabilities exceed the sRGB space by ever more, however.
-Noel

Similar Messages

  • A little problem with color profiles

    I am trying LR and so far I love it, it has successfully replaced RSP for me, and also beat Bibble which I briefly considered but didn't like due to the weird UI.
    However, I have a little problem with colours, which has never happened so far with other converters, and I am hoping you can help me to solve it.
    My monitor is calibrated with the Spyder and the appropriate profile loaded in the video card.
    When I work on a RAW image in LR, and then export a sRGB JPG, and then open it with a browser, or the Win viewer, I see it redder. If I open the image in Faststone, I see it almost sepia.
    If I export a TIFF and open it in PS, I see it as in LR, but when I export a JPG from PS (this is my typical workflow), the resulting image has the same problem.
    Considering that my entire workflow is in sRGB, can anybody coach me as to the correct settings I must use in order to obtain a final sRGB image with the same colors as in LR? I think that I must be doing something wrong, as the program behaves consistently with PS.
    Thank you in advance for any help you will be able to provide.
    Andrea,
    from Italy

    Funny how it's only Windows users that have this 'problem'.
    This is not a 'problem' at all. The only 'problem' here is that you've been used to using non-color-managed applications. Suddenly, Lightroom comes in as a mature, color-managed, program... and you're all going bonkers.
    Mac users aren't going bonkers because we're used to using color-managed applications (Preview, Safari, etc. are all color-managed on a Mac).
    Let me clarify for you that by 'color-managed', I mean that the software is *not only* reading the embedded profile in your image, but is *also* converting, on-the-fly, the RGB values of that image to a new set of RGB values that compensates for the native response of your monitor. Say, for example, your monitor only displays a narrow gamut of reds. Chances are, then, that LR or PS will intelligently compensate for this by saturating reds before sending to your monitor. This is how color management works. You can now imagine the disastrous effects that a bad/inaccurate monitor profile might have...
    Your Windows applications, such as 'Viewer', use the Microsoft ICM 2.0 API. This *will* read the embedded profile in an image, but instead of converting to your monitor profile for output, will simply convert to sRGB. That's basically like half-a$$ color-management. Read more about it here:
    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/reskit/prork/prdn_img_vkev.ms px?mfr=true
    Firefox & IE don't even use the ICM 2.9 API, making them entirely non-color-managed. Whatever the raw RGB values are in your image, these applications spit out at your monitor.
    It's very important you understand these simple concepts before proceeding any further.
    OK, ready?
    The original monitor profile that came with my MacBook Pro (profiled by someone over at Apple generically for all MacBook Pro LCDs, I guess) really seems to have underestimated the gamut of my monitor. Hence, color-managed applications compensated for this be resaturating my images (especially in the oranges/reds) before outputting to monitor. Therefore, images looked really nice and saturated in color-managed applications; however, when I exported them to sRGB JPEGs and then uploaded to the web, they looked desaturated (in Firefox, NOT in Safari, since Safari is color managed). They even looked desaturated on other people's monitors (these 'other people' were your average Joes...).
    I then profiled my monitor using an i1 colorimeter. A 3-D plot of my monitor profile now showed that it actually had a much larger gamut than what Apple had predicted in their profile (but this gamut was still much smaller than sRGB, or the gamut of my Dell LCD or Sony CRT, etc.). Therefore, now, LR and PS, using this new profile, showed images much less saturated. Now when I made my edits, and then exported to sRGB JPEGs, images looked slightly *more* saturated in non-color-managed applications and on other people's computers.
    So, you see, your monitor profile affects how you make adjustments/edits in color-managed programs. If your hardware profiler profiled your monitor incorrectly (which I assume is the problem here), then you may be over-saturating certain colors within LR, skewing those RGB values so that a non-color-managed program, which will not re-correct these values as LR is doing, will display the image with too much, say, red.
    Bad monitor profiling also explains why you see this problem only on certain images/colors... if it were a LR problem, you'd most likely see it on every export. The color variance is more than likely due to a bad monitor profile that is not accurately describing your monitor's native response... hence LR/PS are incorrectly adjusting your images before sending to the monitor.
    And at this point, please don't resort to saying "but the colors in the web browser look 'right' and LR looks 'wrong'". This statement has no meaning, as what looks 'right' to you in your web browser might look horrible to someone else with a different monitor. The point of color-management is to minimize these differences. For example, I was very unhappy by how desaturated my images looked on the web compared to in PS before I calibrated my monitor. Now, images look slightly *more* saturated on the web than in LR/PS, which I'm OK with. *Should* they look the same? Heck no. Similar? Yes. Is it better if they do look the same after hardware profiling? Yes, if your main goal is web export, but, keep in mind, the only way they *would* look the same after PROPER hardware profiling would be if your monitor happened to have a very sRGB-like response (to explain this would take another few paragraphs... but you should be able to figure it out if you ponder a bit).
    I hope this is making sense. Let me ask you a couple questions now:
    1.) For your headshot image, IMG_8860, which colors look 'right' to you -- the colors in LR, or the colors upon export (i.e. the headshot on the left or the right in your link above)?
    2.) How exactly did your profile your monitor? Was it in the dark? I had quite a bit of variance in my monitor profile depending on whether or not the Mac OS X dock was visible at the bottom of the screen -- the light from the dock leaked into the colorimeter which then led to profiles that generated yellow/green color casts.
    -Rishi

  • E-Recruiting: Problems with search profile and serach templates

    Hi Recruiting-Experts,
    I´m facing problems with "Search Profiles" and "Search Templates"
    (Customizing SPRO --> SAP-E-Recruiting --> Recruitment --> Talent Warehouse --> Candidate --> Candidate Search )
    Out customers wants me to add a new search criterion to the talent search. It's a customer-field (type 'd' --> Date)  belonging to infotype 5106.
    Unfortunately, it doesn't work. The hit list is always empty.
    What I did:
    Customizing (see above)
    Updated search profile (report RCF_RECREATE_SEARCH_PROFILES)
    The result:
    I can see and choose the new search criterion on talent warehouse search site (recruiters startpage)
    I can find the data (internal format yyyymmdd) via transaction SKPR07 (see XML below, ZZEARLIEST_ENTRY 20090901)
    By the way, the hit list is also empty when adding and searching for birthdate.
    Has it got to do with the date stored in internal format?
    Thanks for any comments / help.
    Regards
    CHRIS
    =========================================================================

    Hi Sebastian,
    thanks for your quick answer.
    That's why I didn't get it done for hours yesterday.
    Thanks again,
    Regards
    CHRIS

  • I have problems with colours of the pictures in Aperture:

    I have problems with colours of the pictures in Aperture: they becomes pink and green totally "flashy"
    I made all of the base reset's but it's already destroy>.
    Please, could you help me ?
    Thank's,
    Philippe

    Solution
    Delete or restore from Time Machine
    /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCamera.bundle
    /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCameraSupport.bundle
    Download
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1666
    Reinstall 4.07. Finished.

  • Problems with User profile Application not available

    Hi
    Have a 2 tier SP 2010, with SQL server and a single SharePoint2010 server. We have a problem with the User profile Application service.
    The main problem is that we cannot go to "Edit" under Manage User Profiles. If we want to edit a user, we just get an error:
    "Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileApplicationNotAvailableException: No User Profile Application available to service the request. Contact your farm administrator."
    When rebooting the server, we get the following in event viewer: Warning: ASP.NET 2.0.50727.0
    Event code: 3005 
    Event message: An unhandled exception has occurred. 
    Event time: 2/5/2015 12:25:25 PM 
    Event time (UTC): 2/5/2015 11:25:25 AM 
    Event ID: 84d104331476453b88c60a37d7a0b8fe 
    Event sequence: 9 
    Event occurrence: 1 
    Event detail code: 0 
    Application information: 
        Application domain: /LM/W3SVC/1212406818/ROOT-1-130676090755160256 
        Trust level: WSS_Minimal 
        Application Virtual Path: / 
        Application Path: C:\inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\14877\ 
        Machine name: SPMACHINE 
    Process information: 
        Process ID: 4668 
        Process name: w3wp.exe 
        Account name: domain\spfarm 
    Exception information: 
        Exception type: UserProfileApplicationNotAvailableException 
        Exception message: No User Profile Application available to service the request. Contact your farm administrator. 
    Request information: 
        Request URL: http://sp2010:2010/_layouts/ProfMngr.aspx?ID=51982fe8-4886-4ebd-ad68-f5934656e54d&IsDlg=1 
        Request path: /_layouts/ProfMngr.aspx 
        User host address: ::1 
        User: domain\spfarm 
        Is authenticated: True 
        Authentication Type: NTLM 
        Thread account name: domain\spfarm
    Thread information: 
        Thread ID: 15 
        Thread account name: domain\spfarm 
        Is impersonating: False 
        Stack trace:    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.UserProfiles.AdminUI.ProfileAdminPage.get_CurrentApplication()
       at Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.UserProfiles.AdminUI.ProfileAdminPage.get_CurrentApplicationProxy()
       at Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.WebControls.ProfileQueryUsers._FillSubtypeCollection()
       at Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.WebControls.ProfileQueryUsers..ctor()
       at ASP._layouts_profmngr_aspx.__BuildControlProfileQuery()
       at ASP._layouts_profmngr_aspx.__BuildControl__control6(Control __ctrl)
       at ASP._admin_admin_master.__BuildControlPlaceHolderMain()
       at ASP._admin_admin_master.__BuildControl__control21()
       at ASP._admin_admin_master.__BuildControl__control2()
       at ASP._admin_admin_master.__BuildControlTree(_admin_admin_master __ctrl)
       at System.Web.UI.MasterPage.CreateMaster(TemplateControl owner, HttpContext context, VirtualPath masterPageFile, IDictionary contentTemplateCollection)
       at System.Web.UI.Page.get_Master()
       at System.Web.UI.Page.ApplyMasterPage()
       at System.Web.UI.Page.PerformPreInit()
       at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)

    Hi Thomas,
    Based on the error message, I recommend to verify the things below:
    Please make sure that User Profile Service is started in Central Administration.
    Please make sure Forefront Identity Manager Service and Forefront Identity Manager Synchronization Service are started in services.msc.
    Change the schedule for the "Timer Service Recycle" job to run during off peak hours, when a small amount of timer jobs are running.
    Check ULS log for more detailed error message.  For SharePoint 2010, by default, ULS log is at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\LOGS.
    Thanks,
    Victoria
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

  • 5700 TV-OUT problem with colours

    Hi!!! I'm trying to fix the problem with my vga, but I could not get it fixed... The problem is that sice yesterday the colours in TV-Out mode is wrong, it appears that is on iverse colours, but I cannot change it. I had already reinstaled the nVidia 56.72 driver, reinstaled Windows XP SP1, and didn't work. Earlier today, I tried to connect the composite video cable and get the right colours, but just before I connected the S-Video again to check if the colours was right as composite, but for my sadness, it wasn't. Then I reconnected the composite and the colours was worg that out too, now the two TV-Outs, composite and S-Video are with the wrog colours... I don't know what else to do... help me!!!
    Thank you anyway.

    Hi,
    Try changing the TV standard. Brazil uses a less common PAL-M standard, which uses NTSC line and field rates (525 lines,60 fields/sec) and a unique colour subcarrier frequency, which is close to the standard NTSC frequency.  For more details on TV standards, look here.
    You might have to experiment to find the combination which works best with your TV set.
    Cheers

  • Gradient Problems with colours

    Hi I am new to Illustrator (just bought CS5) and I am having trouble with the colours when using gradients (colours are generally duller as well) but when I make a gradient from red to black the computer automatically puts a grey inbetween, (photoshop has no problems the colours are clear and bright)  I recently did a tutorial http://veerle.duoh.com/design/article/illustrator_inset_effect_on_text_in_combination_with _clipping_mask (she had the same tutorial in photoshop, which worked great) but my colours in illustrator are having this grey issue and the image came out looking very dull. 
    Is there some file setting I may have changed to cause this?
    Thank you

    The color setup in AI is trying to simulate the way CMYK actually looks in print. Sometimes the simulated display goes overboard, and it's impractical to write you a textbook on the whole color management (color calibration) subject in a user forum. (Plus, replies in a user forum are as often wrong as right.) There is plenty of reading material out there for you on this. (Start with the Help files, as the Color Settings dialog suggests.)
    When designing for CMYK print, work in a CMYK document. Switching color modes is bad practice, especially if you intend for your on-press values to actually be the values you specify in the document. For example:
    1. Set up your red (100M, 100Y) to black (100K) grad.
    2. Change Document Color Mode to RGB.
    3. Change Document Color Mode to CMYK.
    4. Look at what has happened to your original CMYK values.
    The best way to work in CMYK is to have a basic understanding of CMYK and the real-world principles of process printing. For example, if you do as Jacob suggests, and make the black end of your grad also contain the "red" (100M, 100Y), you will have a 300% total ink coverage at that end of your grad. That may or may not be a problem, depending on the target printing environment.
    Generally speaking, yes; CMYK print is almost always "dull" compared to viewing RGB on a monitor (and you are always viewing RGB on a monitor, even if it is shifted to simulate CMYK). This is true regardless of color calibration. Common sense goes a long way. Monitors glow; paper doesn't.
    One of the most overlooked facts is that human vision is highly adaptive. Even in RGB, your monitor never displays anything even approaching a true black. Yet your eye nonetheless sees a dark rich black.
    CMYK process, for example, is very poor at reproducing brilliant blues. Yet the combination of knowledgeable image color correction (as opposed to mere calibration), quality printing, and the adaptive nature of human vision can nonetheless result in printed blues that seem to "glow."
    If you're designing for commercial print, you should seek to understand the process enough that you would be comfortable assigning colors while working on a grayscale monitor. Again, that comes from both study and real-world exposure. Actually visit the press room whenever you have the opportunity. Maybe even take a course in commercial repro at the local tech school. You can't really gain the understanding you need in a software user forum. This is a huge subject.
    JET

  • Help with colour profiles and wide gamut monitor

    Hi there,
    I know this issue must crop up a lot due to its confusing nature but I would really appreciate it if someone could explain what settings I should be using in Photoshop to get accurate colours. I had a look around and couldn't find any other discussions that answered this exactly.
    My set up is a Dell 2408WFP monitor which is wide-gamut. I have calibrated this using a huey Pro calibrator (therefore have an accurate system colour profile). My photos are in Canon sRGB space, set by Digital Photo Professional (obviously easily changed if need be).
    What I would like is to be able to preview what my photos will look like on a standard sRGB display. When I open a photo in Photoshop with all the settings on their default it looks extremely washed out, very low contrast and saturation. This is nothing like what the photos look like outside of Photoshop, and also not what the photos look like on other (normal gamut) displays. I have tried using the "proof colours" settings. When I have "proof setup" set to Internet Standard sRGB the colours look dreadful, oranges become blood-red, definitely not what I am getting when I view the image on a standard monitor. If I have it set to Monitor RGB then I get colours that look like my monitor outside of Photoshop -- this is the closest out of the three to the result I am actually getting on standard gamut displays. However I know it is not accurate because I know my monitor is wide gamut and therefore more has more contrast (and this is the case).
    So what combination of photo colour space, proof colour space, and proof colours settings should I be using? My main priority is just the Joe Average using his TN panel monitor on facebook, I accept that on my monitor they will look slightly different. Settings for print don't concern me at the moment.
    Thanks for the help. To anyone who will suggest that I read up on colour profiles... I have, and I understand them to an extent, but there are so many variables here that I am getting lost (monitor profile, photo profile, photoshop settings, DPP settings, faststone viewer's settings, browser's lack of awareness...)
    Andrew

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    thekrimsonchin wrote:
    I know this issue must crop up a lot due to its confusing nature
    You have no idea. 
    What I'm reading is that you want Photoshop, with its color management enabled, to display your sRGB photos as they would be seen on a true sRGB monitor - i.e., accurately.
    Something to always keep in mind, when everything's set right and working properly:  Your sRGB image displayed on your wide gamut monitor without color management (e.g., by Internet Explorer) will look bolder and brighter (more color-saturated) than the same image displayed in Photoshop with color-management.  There is no getting around this, because the sRGB profile is not equivalent to the monitor profile.  Do not expect them to look the same.
    It's hard, without being there and seeing what you're seeing, to judge whether your sRGB images are undersaturated compared to what's seen on other monitors.  I do know, as one with sRGB monitors myself, that images can look quite vibrant and alive in the sRGB color space.
    What we can't know is whether your judgment that your color-managed sRGB images are undersaturated is correct in an absolute sense, or whether you're just feeling the difference between seeing them on your monitor in non-color-managed apps and Photoshop.
    Photoshop normally does its color management like this:  It combines the information from the color profile in your document with the color profile of the monitor, which it retrieves from a standard place in Windows, and creates a transform used to display the colors.
    To have it do this you would NOT want the Proof Colors setting enabled.  It is the default behavior.
    -Noel
    P.S., I don't recall whether DPP is color-managed, but you might consider using Photoshop's raw converter, which definitely shows color-managed output, per the settings I described above.
    P.P.S.,  Your calibrator/profiler should have put the monitor profile in the proper place and set all the proper stuff up in Windows.  Is it specifically listed as compatible with the version of Windows you're running?

  • Problem with color profile printing

    I have an Epson R280 and an Epson NX415 scanner/printer combo. When I print from Photoshop to the R280 it's very easy, I make sure that in the printer settings, under Color Management, ICM and "Off (no color adjustment)" are selected. According to some tutorials I've seen online, this is the way to ensure that the printer driver will not perform any further color conversion, and that the working profile will be the one selected under "Printer profile" in the Photoshop native dialog. In that list I have a few color profiles available for the R280, which I assume were installed in the system when I installed the driver for the R280. With these profiles, as long as I select the Epson R290 R280 profile, it prints very close to what I see on the screen.
    The problem is that replacing all six cartridges on the R280 is over $80, while replacing all four on the NX415 is about half, so I use this one for almost everything. The big problem I have with it is that the drivers didn't install any color profiles, so I cannot find the right profile to print to it. So far I've tried using the R280 profiles and some work better than others, but none of them gives me the right colors that I see on the photo inside Photoshop. One of them called "SPR280 290 Photo Qlty IJP" comes close, but it's not the same, I see that the hue is a little off, especially on yellowish areas.
    So my question is, how do I get profiles that are meant for the NX415, for each type of paper? I don't want to keep wasting ink and paper doing print tests.
    Thanks,
    Sebastian

    If it didn't install any profiles, it may just expect the data to be in one of the standard document profiles - e.g., sRGB.  Some printer drivers work this way.
    If you're unable to find an indication one way or another with a web search of what profile to use, I'd try sRGB and maybe Adobe RGB to see if they appear to match.
    There are devices you can buy to allow you to profile your own printer with your paper, etc., though I have not used one.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu0qUb4J5A4
    -Noel

  • Firefox fails to open saying it has problems with the profile.

    It will open if the path is specified in Terminal, and the profile appears to be located in the correct place. Profile Manager is inaccessible. I should note it's on a friends computer not my own and he seems to have moved about quite a lot of stuff, he's also broken DVD player

    Are you using an NTLM proxy? There is a known problem with that which will be fixed in beta 7. This thread has more details - [/questions/751415]

  • Problem with user profile!!

    You are better copying it from a like machine.
    You said you had this problem before and upgrade from 2008 to 2012 - something hasn't been right for a long time.
    I also don't understand why it has bitlocker on it, it probably has nothing to do with the profile issues, but still, I wonder.
    Make sure your AV product isn't blocking your login to the profile, try re-creating the profile first - move your data off it.
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/fix-corrupted-user-profile#1TC=windows-7
    For windows 7 but principal is the same

    I think this is a problem where on a local machine or member server, something locks up the user profile on that machine's Registry and causes Windows to freak out and say "Uh oh, I cant use the Registry to manage the profile on this computer, I'll create a "temporary" profile for the user with generic settings and let him fix it"
    then when you log on, you're in some weird profile and nothing works right.
    The only way I know how to fix that is to totally delete the local profile and then log back on.

  • MacBook Pro display....problem with coloured pixels appearing

    I wonder if anyone can help - I have recently noticed on the left hand side of my display on my MacBook Pro that there is a large number of coloured pixels appearing more and more by the day. I have had the MacBook since Christmas, and it has been treated very well, i have never dropped it or damaged it in any way etc. At the moment the pixels aren't causing too much of a problem but i don't want it to get any worse. Has anyone had similar problems, and if so any suggestions?
    Many thanks in advance

    I haven't had any luck what so ever - only thing left for me to try is to completely wipe the system and re-install everything from scratch, if that doesn't work then i think i'll be contacting Apple..... which i should have done already to be honest, would have saved a lot of time and hassle! Only difference between mine and what your describing on your Mac is that the pixels are visible at all times on mine, no matter what apps i'm running etc, it is definately a problem with the screen.....i'll keep you updated with any developments

  • Problem with BBM profile picture

    Dear All,
    Last few days when I change my BBM profile picture, it didn't show or updated on my friends. I was using BBM 5.0.1.38 before. Due to this matter I upgraded my BBM to 5.0.1.41. But even after upgrade it didn't help. Same problem still occurs, profile picture didn't change but BBM status work just fine. I already tried to reinstall BBM several times, battery pull, resend service book, re register HRT, and even wipe my BB and still cant solve this matter.
    I notice that some of my friends are experiencing same things too
    I'm using 9550/5.0.0.983. Please advice.
    Thank you
    Willy

    Hello,
    Try uninstalling and reinstalling BlackBerry Messenger from
    www.blackberry.com/messenger in your BlackBerry Browser.
    Also if you have Facebook installed remove it then reboot. Reinstall BBM
    from www.blackberry.com/messenger and test again.
    Thank you
    -DrP
    Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
    Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.
    Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

  • Problems with COLOUR when using "save as".

    Running on Mac, get dulled out and purple colour tone when using "Save As".  When using "Save for Web.." colours are OK.  Colour profiles and images coming into Raw are set as sRGB. Can anyone help??   I do have to convert to 8 bit to save as JPG.  Any help appreciated.

    The Print version is what a ProPhoto file looks like when viewed as if it was sRGB - i.e. in a non-color managed application. So there's still a ProPhoto profile here.
    Here you can see how the colors shift by going between sRGB and ProPhoto (using assign and/or convert). Your original is in the middle. You can see it's the very same color shift:
    If you convert to sRGB and you still get the same outcome, which you shouldn't, maybe the preferences are corrupt. Or maybe user error and you still have ProPhoto embedded.

  • Problem with colours and tonalty in LR 1.1 conversions

    Im having hard times trying to get great colour and tonalty out of LR conversions. Some times it seems that its just impossible to get there where I want with LR. No matter how much I tweak sliders in Calibration Tab or in Colour Adjustment Tab, subtle tones and colours are just impossible to get.
    Example
    Both pictures have been edited in converters only resizing and text has been inserted in photoshop. Picture taken with Konica Minolta 7D.
    http://luotokuva.fi/noudettavat/Oranssi_2.jpg
    1. Under cloud there is subtle colour gradient with DxO conversion that LR conversion lacks
    2. Colour transitions in DxO versions have much more life. There is just one tone on lake in LR vesion.
    3. Suns reflection in LR conversion clips and is ugly. Again DxO verson has far more natural tonalty.
    For those who believe they can do better job with LR conversion here is the raw file for them to play.
    http://www.luotokuva.fi/noudettavat/PICT0906.zip
    I hope LR conversions would be better because programs usability is far better than DxOs.
    -Sampsa Kaijaluoto - Finland

    The problem is not in the tone, but in the lack in the number of tones. I can change the colors, but i can't get the colors to slide in a perfect gradient. Look these images:
    This is how the area around the sun should look (Canon DPP)
    http://jkphoto.pp.fi/upload/sun_dpp.jpg
    And this is how Lr converts it with defaults:
    http://jkphoto.pp.fi/upload/sun_acr.jpg
    In past i have done accurate profiles for my cameras to ACR with the color checker and calibration script and calibration has no effect on how the tones just clip off.

Maybe you are looking for