Process order settlement

Hi,
when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
Sunoj

error message when executing KKS2
KV 206 1 OIT 20000095/1 No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001 Checking and processing orders

Similar Messages

Error during Process order settlement

Hi Gurus,
i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
Please help me to overcome this issue.
Point will be rewarded if question solved.
Than'x
Dhananjay R

hi gopan,
Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
pls help me to solve this issue..
Than'x
Dhananjay

Process order settlement to cost center

Hi,
We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
postings.
The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
valuated materials.
I am planning to propose the following :-
1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
raise Purchase orders.
2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
account.
Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

Answered

Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type

Hi Experts
Our Client a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
In SAP a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC :-
1 Chart of Accounts
2 Transaction PRD
3 Valuation Modifier
4 General Modifier
5 Valuation Class
6 GL Account
Can this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
Thanks
Suman

Dear Suman,
Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
Thanks & Kind Regards
Umapathi G

PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

Hi!
As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material. OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88.
Sreenivas

Hi
Settlement entries are same as in production order. No diff
However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order. If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated. If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted.
Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

Problem with process order settlement

Hi,
I'm having a problem while doing settlment for process orders. I have two types of process orders AJWV and AJW0; AJWV works for center 2000 and AJW0 works for center 1000. When I calculate variances both work good. The problem comes when I try to settle them. For AJWV orders there are three finance documents generated, FI document, Controlling document and Profit Center document. But for AJW0 it's just generated Controlling document and Profit Center document.
Both order types have the same settlement profile assinged
The settlement rule for both orders is to Cost Center, full settlement 100%
Both orders are produced for Sales order with valuated stock
I already checked the account assigment for the materials corresponding to each order, and both account determination are ok.
What can be the problem so the AJW0 is not posting to FI variances?
Thanks

Hi,
Yes for AJWV the FI entry was generated.

How to see Process Order settlement details?

Dear Experts,
How do I view the accounting/controlling details after a Process Order Settlemnet is carried out?
In OBYC, what is the posting transaction for Order Settlement through which I can see the valuation class & G/L account assigned?

Hi,
IF you wish to check the Accouting documents or settlement documents , you can check throw CO88 select Previous Settlement to check the detaiils or else you can go to KOB1 Order line item display for checking all the line items.
in KOB1 T.code you can check all the documents including Material and other by double clicking the items.
Hope this will Help you ..
Thanks
Goutam

Material Code for Process Order Settlement document

HI,
When Process Order to a material having Standard Price is settled, the following entry is passed.
Inventory Change A/C Debit/Credit
Price difference A/C Debit/Credit
It is being obeserved that in the line item of FI document for the Inventory Change the material code appears in the Price difference line items whereas for Inventory Change line item the material code does not appear.
I want to know why this happens ?
Regards
Partha

Using warehouse management /WM) :
- Create a control cycle for the component, using LPK1. Here you define if the supply will be specific for the order (when weighing takes place in the warehouse) or for released orders (normallu full packages of components and weighing is done at plant level). Reference to a supply area.
- The resource used in the operation has a reference to the supply area.
- Components have material master views in WM for the selected storage type
Then, when releasing the orders run LP10 - LP12 to generate the Transfer requirements for the raw materials. These TR will be converted to Transfer Orders and Confirmed, so the stock will be moved to your supply area.
Using Inventory Management, none of the above is required. You can use MF60 to move materials from General Storage Location to Shop Floor SLoc.
Regards

Incomplete Process order settlement at Month end.

We have issue with order settlement during the month end. We have process orders that run over the week (thus will run over the month-end), with REL, PCNF, and PDLV status at the month end. Production does not want to close/ TECO those orders, as we are not yet done. But FI wants to settle them for the month end.
1) Can FI settle those REL work orders, as mentioned before?
This is what I found:
2) The standard practice is TECO, is to set before closing the order.
3) You can only perform (business) closing for a process order if (CLSD):
The order has status Released (REL), Control recipe created (CRCR) or Control recipe discarded (CRAB), or Technically completed (TECO). To have status Technically completed, the order must have already reached status Released.
The order balance is 0.
There are no more open purchase requisitions, orders, or commitments for it.
All data related to the process order is available and correct (For example, the inspection lots for the order must be completed).
There are no future change records from the confirmation processes
2) So, if statement 1) is correct, is this correct lifeycle:
A.     Settlement at month end for all orders with REL status.
B.      TECO after settlement, and also after DLV and CNF status.
C.      Close after TECO.
Upload in your comments, if there is any link.
Thanks, points will be rewarded.

Hi Abi,
Since the Process order is in uncompleted stage and partially delivered to stock, still it has WIP to be delivered to stock.
Calculate the WIP value & settle the order in Month end.
Prerequisite for WIP calculation is order should has REL status.
In month end for Uncompleted order , calculate WIP value & settle the Order.
General steps for month end practice:
Over head calculation
WIP calculation
Variance calculation - Once the Order receives - DLV /TECO status.
Order settlement.
Order closing
Regards
Pradeep

Stop Process order settlement (CO88/KO88) for DLV status orders

Hello gurus,
My business requirement is to prevent process orders with status DLV (Delivery completed). In standard SAP orders with DLV/TECO are being settled to settlement receiver. ANy help would be richly rewarded.
Thanks
RG

Dear Ajay,
Thanks.
I am able to change the profile. But after that when I try to exit from the screen system throws the following error/message :
1 Receiver categ. MAT is not allowed by settlement prof. 000090 for this sender
2. Maximum number of 0 rules reached
3. Rules exist, but set. prof. 000090 states no settmt of act.costs/cost of sales
First two are Errors and last one is message with yellow mark.
Thanks and Regards,
Nirav

Process order - settlement rule

hi experts,
our client has a R&D trial batches scenario .
for that they will create a process order and the cost should go to cost center of r&d and not to matrial.
at present i get MAT in settlement rule , so the cost is settled against material.
i need CTR to come in default when i create the process order instaed of MAT .
please advice.
regards,
satish

If PS is implemented
for project related production for R & D
1) create a project profile with non valuated( for raw material procurement for project the price is taken from info record.
2) assign the production material in activity
3) maintain a settlement rule as cost center R &D
4) Run a MRP for a material
5) convert plan order into production order, system will set the WBS as settlement rule
6) Do the GI in MB1A or co11n ,confirmation in Co11n & GR in MB31 or MIGO or in CO11n
(If the material is valuated, system will take MAT as default ( as per the setting in OPL8 default settlement rule as PP1 or PP2)
the reason is if material is valuated, variance = (GI value + activity value) - GR value
only the variance in settled in settlement, so the variance value( (GI value + activity value) - GR value ) is going to MAT
if the material is non valuated then variance =(GI value + activity value) )
7) do the settlement for production order ( the variance (GI value + activity value) ) is settled to WBS element
8) after that confirm the project in CN27.
9) settled the project in CJ88, the cost will settled to relevant cost center
if PS in not implemented
or go head with
you can create a order in CORO itself by maintaining settlement rule as CTR with R& d cost center( manually)
we can't make particular cost center as default in settlement rule.

Process order settlement configuration

Dear experts,
I'm trying to run the end month process to settle and properly take the costs to the materials as per confirmed trough activity types with price mantained, but really dont know the exact process to follow, can anyone please explan this process and the config needed, does this has something to do with CO88 or KO88
I see some config trough transactions OKG1 to OKG8 is this config mandatory? or what config needs to be done
When I run KO88 for an order that is confirmed and delivered and status TECO i get this message "There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible"
Your help here will be highly appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi
It seems RA Key is specified in your Prod order.. But you have not calculated WIP and tried to settle directly.. thats why you got this message...
IMG > Controllin > Prod Cost Cont > Cost Obj Con > Prod cost by order > Period end > WIP / Variance....
you need to do settings in the nodes here... I suggest refer Building block library.... Type " SAP Building block library" in google and refer the BB Library for CO-Product Costing
br, Ajay M

Process Order Settlement without GR or GI

Hello,
I have a quick question that I need help with please. A process order has no Goods Receipt yet (only consumption) as of month-end when we settle all orders. Will such an order settle and post an entry to GL even though it is not completed yet?
Also, if an order has Goods Receipt but no consumption (I know it doesnt make sense, but it is an error order), will it still settle?
Thanks,
Gligor.

Hi,
If I understood correctly, you have consumptions of RM from your inventory but you dont have production GR. You wanted to do the order settlement.
- Why do you want to settle order that is not completed in production? If there are any expenses on the order during the month, shouldn't these expenses be tracked as WIP?
- Also, for the case where there are GR without GI, are there any activity consumptions on the process order?
Thanks,
Ram

Process order settlement driven by T030 & TKA3C vs settlement from recipe

We settle all process order cost (consumption, production, and variances) to the cost center (or P&L).   These settlements are driven by a hard coded structure (by valuation class) and tables T030 & TKA3C.
I suggest that this is not common SAP practice. This is certainly not SAP best practice.   I believe this has resulted in the proliferation of valuation classes and cost elements (in order to settle production differently.)   Does it make sense to have over 300 valuation classes?   Can you please confirm?
I suggest that we only need to settle production order variances and activity cost! The correct settlement should be defined as part of the resource (and recipe group).   We already define this but they have no consequence because of the configuration of our SAP. Should settlement should be recipe driven and not material driven! It would not mater what the valuation class of the consumed materials, or the produced materials. Settlement would be defined by the resource attached to the recipe.
How does SAP overide the resource (cost center), and activity (cost center) attached to the recipe with tables T030 & TKA3C?

The forum [FPM - General|Enterprise Performance Management (SAP EPM); in which you originally posted your question deals mainly with the financial performance applications otherwise known as Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) carrying the BusinessObjects brand.   Your question pertains to SAP [ERP Financials Controlling|SAP ERP Financials - Controlling; which is covered by another forum. Therefore your message has been moved. Please adjust any bookmarks you might have and post to the appropriate area in the future, that way you are assured you will have the right audience reading your posts.
Thanks and best regards,
[Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
SAP Labs, LLC
BusinessObjects Division
Americas Applications Regional Implementation Group (RIG)

Process order settlement error

Hi all
        while doing settlement of process order in KO88, system throwing the follwing error.
                 '' valuation data for the material is being locked by the user xxxxxx'' .     If we check in transaction: SM12 , here system showing MARA, MARC tables being locked.
        Some background jobs also running which include MARA,MARC tables.   so please suggest me the best way to do settlement of process orders. The background jobs should not stop.
thanks
sapproduction

HI
At the same time one masters like material WC or PV cannot be processed the database tables used are locked while processing the same to get resolve this check the time of scheduled jobs which uses tables like MARA MARC after the finish of these jobs you can process the settlement if you get unlock the data from T code SM12 there is possibility of getting data lost. so
you can define your settlement process and schedule it just after the completion of those previous Jobs.
Check and revert
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Process order settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for