Profile chance at user level

hi,
two things i wanted to know.
(1) Can i change site name at user level ? (i tried updatable for user th' Application Developer responsibility)
(2) The default color for query mode is Yellow. I want to change it to blue. Is this possible ?
TIA
dbaapps.

Hi Babu,
FND: Debug Log Enabled : Yes
FND: Debug Log Level : Statement
- Navigate to sysadmin responsibility > profile > system
- Find for the respective profiles eg: FND: Debug Log Enabled
- Set your desired value.
2. Run the Create Accounting Program
Run the create accounting conncurrnet program View > Request > New from the respective module
SELECT substr(module,1,70), MESSAGE_TEXT, timestamp, log_sequence
FROM fnd_log_messages msg, fnd_log_transaction_context tcon
WHERE msg.TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID = tcon.TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID
AND tcon.TRANSACTION_ID = <’Accounting program ‘ request ID>
ORDER BY LOG_SEQUENCE
Run this query from backend, and provide the Concurrent ID of the Create accounting program (replace this at <’Accounting program ‘ request ID>)
- Create Accounting
- Accounting Program
Upload the the logfile and output files of the respective program and the output of the above query.
I believe this is an action plan from the SR, you may also get the assistance from the SR itself and they will help you. Anyways let us know if you need any assistance
Thanks &
Best Regards

Similar Messages

How to create a profile value at user level programatically

Dear all,
I want to create a profile value at user level programatically, I refer to the developer guide and try to use fnd_profile.put() to create a new value.
But I find out the value is just created in session level, not be inserted into base table.
So is there anyone know how to realize this function in PL/SQL?
Any idea is appreciated.
Best Regards,
Kenny

Check Note: 364503.1 - How to Set a System Profile Value Without Logging in to the Applications
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=364503.1

Update profile options at user level?

Hi All,
Need a script for,
update profile options at user level, for example we should be able to update a profile xyz for a user abc using that script?
or please provide the document related to that..

Hi All,
Thanks for all sugessions,
i have written an script for updating profile option value from backend.
SELECT d.level_id,c.user_name, b.profile_option_name, a.user_profile_option_name,d.profile_option_value
FROM fnd_profile_options_tl a,
fnd_profile_options b,
fnd_user c,
fnd_profile_option_values d
WHERE d.profile_option_id = b.profile_option_id
AND d.level_id = 10004
AND a.profile_option_name = b.profile_option_name
AND d.level_value = c.user_id
AND c.user_name = '&USER_NAME'
update query
update fnd_profile_option_values
set profile_option_value = '&Profile_Option_Value'
where profile_option_id in
(select profile_option_id from fnd_profile_options where profile_option_name
=(select profile_option_name from fnd_profile_options_tl
where user_profile_option_name = ('&User_Profile_Option_Name')))
and level_id = 10004
and level_value in (select user_id from fnd_user
where user_name in ('&User_Name'))
Thanks
One

Profile options at USER level in EBS r12

Hi Gurus
I'm an new to Oracle EBS can some one help with this,
1. Turn on debugging using the following profile options at USER level :
FND: Debug Log Enabled : Yes
FND: Debug Log Level : Statement
2. Run the Create Accounting Program
3. Derive debug message using the following query and upload in excel format :
SELECT substr(module,1,70), MESSAGE_TEXT, timestamp, log_sequence
FROM fnd_log_messages msg, fnd_log_transaction_context tcon
WHERE msg.TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID = tcon.TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID
AND tcon.TRANSACTION_ID = <’Accounting program ‘ request ID>
ORDER BY LOG_SEQUENCE
4. Upload the LOG and OUTPUT files for the :
- Create Accounting
- Accounting Program
Will be waiting for you reply.
Best Regards
Babu.

Hi Babu,
FND: Debug Log Enabled : Yes
FND: Debug Log Level : Statement
- Navigate to sysadmin responsibility > profile > system
- Find for the respective profiles eg: FND: Debug Log Enabled
- Set your desired value.
2. Run the Create Accounting Program
Run the create accounting conncurrnet program View > Request > New from the respective module
SELECT substr(module,1,70), MESSAGE_TEXT, timestamp, log_sequence
FROM fnd_log_messages msg, fnd_log_transaction_context tcon
WHERE msg.TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID = tcon.TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID
AND tcon.TRANSACTION_ID = <’Accounting program ‘ request ID>
ORDER BY LOG_SEQUENCE
Run this query from backend, and provide the Concurrent ID of the Create accounting program (replace this at <’Accounting program ‘ request ID>)
- Create Accounting
- Accounting Program
Upload the the logfile and output files of the respective program and the output of the above query.
I believe this is an action plan from the SR, you may also get the assistance from the SR itself and they will help you. Anyways let us know if you need any assistance
Thanks &
Best Regards

Script to check finding profile option at user level

HI Friends,
i want to find out
script to check finding profile options at user level using sql in oracle apps 11i.
Please suggest me.
Thanks,
DBA

i want to find out
script to check finding profile options at user level using sql in oracle apps 11i.Note: 470102.1 - How To Check If a Profile Option Is Set In Oracle Application
Note: 201945.1 - How to list E-Business Suite Profile Option values for all levels using SQLPlus
Note: 282382.1 - How to Search all of the Profile Options for a Specific Value
Note: 367926.1 - How To Find All Users With A Particular Profile Option Set?
Note: 282382.1 - How to Search all of the Profile Options for a Specific Value
How To Set A System Profile Value Without Logging In To The Applications [ID 364503.1]
How to Change Profile Option Value Without Forms [ID 943710.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Disable profile option updation at user level

I want to disable the profile option HR: Security Profile or for that matter any other profile option at user level. The user should be able to see the value set by the system administrator (Field should be grayed out) and user should not be able to update it.
How to do it??

Try a personalization combined with custom PLSQL, like this:
1) Acces System Profiles
2) Help->Diagnostics->Custom Code->Personalize
3) In the newly displayed Form Personalization form, create a line with a description like this: Prevent modification of USER_VISIBLE_VALUE
4) In the Conditions tab, set Trigger Event = WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE
5) Set Trigger Object = PROFILE_VALUES.USER_VISIBLE_VALUE
6) In the Condition text area, enter:
apps.xxror_test_sysprofile(:PROFILE_VALUES.USER_PROFILE_OPTION_NAME,'USER')=1
7) Set Processing Mode to Both
8) Switch to the Actions tab and create two actions:
first:
type = property
description = Don't update
Language=all
enabled=yes
object type=Item
target object=PROFILE_VALUES.USER_VISIBLE_VALUE
property name=UPDATE_ALLOWED
value=false
second:
type=property
description=Don't enter
language=all
enabled=yes
object type=Item
target object=PROFILE_VALUES.USER_VISIBLE_VALUE
property name=ALTERABLE_PLUS
value=false
9) Repeat steps 3-8 if desired for other levels, such as:
Prevent modification of SITE_VISIBLE_VALUE
Prevent modification of APPL_VISIBLE_VALUE
Prevent modification of RESP_VISIBLE_VALUE
Prevent modification of SERVER_VISIBLE_VALUE
Prevent modification of ORG_VISIBLE_VALUE
paying attention to update the corresponding names for xxx_VISIBLE_VALUE.
10) Create the following PLSQL function:
CREATE OR REPLACE function xxror_test_sysprofile (
prof_opt_name in varchar2,
lvl in varchar2
return number
is
v_ret number;
s_prof varchar2(1024);
s_uname varchar2(100);
s_lvl varchar2(10);
begin
-- returns 0 if the user "uname" must be granted access the profile named "prof_opt_name" at the "lvl" level
-- returns 1 if the user "uname" must be forbidden to access such a profile at such a level.
-- important assumption: the "lvl" parameter may have only one of the following values:'SITE', 'APPL', 'RESP', 'USER', 'SERVER', 'ORG'
-- or else this function will return 1, thus forbidding the access
s_uname:=substr(upper(trim(nvl(fnd_profile.value('USERNAME'),''))),1,100);
if s_uname in ('MY_ADMIN_1','MY_ADMIN_2','SYSADMIN') then
v_ret:=0; -- no restrictions
else
     if s_uname in ('MY_POWERUSER_1','MY_POWERUSER_2') then
     -- restrict to only the below mentioned profiles
     s_prof:=substr(upper(trim(nvl(prof_opt_name,''))),1,1024);
          s_lvl:=substr(upper(trim(nvl(lvl,''))),1,10);
          if
          (s_prof like '%WHATEVER%')
          then
               if s_lvl in ('SITE', 'APPL', 'RESP', 'USER', 'SERVER', 'ORG') then
                    v_ret:=0; -- level acceptable for these users on these profiles
               else
                    v_ret:=1; -- unknown level, so reject
               end if;
          else
               -- these users may not access these profiles, so reject
               v_ret:=1;
          end if;
     else
          if s_lvl = 'SITE' then
          -- no way any other user than those above may modify site-level profiles
          v_ret:=1;
          else
               -- any other user than those above may modify lower-level profiles, but
               -- for now reject all
               v_ret:=1;
          end if;
     end if;
end if;
return v_ret;
end;
Pls be aware that testing first on a test instance is always advisable.

HR: Security Profile at User Level

Hi
As HR: Security Profile is not enabled for user level, but sometime we need it for some users. Workaround is set up a different responsibility for the same.
Also We can go to Application Developer Responsibility and set enable user level for HR: Security Profile option. Is it Ok to do it or this may break the system at some point.
Suggestions Please.

Gaurav,
I am not an expert in this area, but I do not think enabling the profile at the user level will cause any issues. In our site, what we have done is to create a security profile specific to that user and assigned it in the HR module (not sure of the specifics, but I can find out if you are interested) - we did not enable the profile option at the user level as you are wanting to do. SR can provide you with another opinion :-)
HTH
Srini

How to assign profiles at user level ?

hello every body.....i have created 2 users say x , y
and i have assigned them general ledger responsibilty.....
.at site level profile Gl set of books name is vision operation..
.now i have assigned Gl set of books profile to user x at user level
as vision china...and to user y as vision germany.....when i login with
different user name with gl responsibilty ......after navigating
to----journal-->enter--->new journal----for both users iam getting the
same currency which is at sit level...i thought for x user the currency
will be china currency
and for y user it will be germany curreny which i hav assigned at user level....
please help me regarding this.......
thanks and regars
imran

Hi,
i have assigned it at user level then why iam i
getting the currency code of site level ?Did you user to logout and login again after setting the profile option at the user level?
What if you set this profile option at the site/application/responsibility level, can you reproduce the issue then?
Thanks,
Hussein

Roaming Profile at User level simply not copying...no error

Little rusty on setting this up but if I recall if I choose to setup roaming profiles at the user object level then I simply need to create a share with the appropriate share/NTFS permissions then assign the UNC path in the Profile tab in ADUC? We
are running Win 2008 R2 with Win 7 SP1 clients.
If this is correct then I have done this and the profile will simply not roam...no errors in event log, the test user simply logs in and has a normal local profile. While I am logged in as this user I can access the above UNC and create a folder so
I think permissions are ok.
Originally this computer and test user were in an OU where I set a GPO setting up Folder Redirection. Thinking that I possibly configured something incorrectly there I moved the user and computer object to a basic OU where only the default domain policy
is applied. No change.
I don't remember getting this part working to be such a hassle so I am at a loss now how to troubleshoot further.
Thanks

Hi,
Since Roaming Profile doesn’t work correctly, and you could not find any error in the event logs. At this time, I suggest you’d better first check for the correct permissions on the profile
share. In addition to logging events in the Application Event log, User Profiles can provide a detailed log to aid troubleshooting. To create a detailed log file for user profiles:
1. Start regedit and locate the following path: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon
2. Create a new value called UserEnvDebugLevel as a REG_DWORD, and set the value to 30002 in hexadecimal format.
The log file can be found at: %windir%\debug\usermode\userenv.log
Regarding how to troubleshoot Roaming Profile issue, please try to refer to the following article to see if it helps.
Troubleshoot User Profiles with Events
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj649075.aspx
Here are some guide about how to configure Roaming Profile, they may be useful to us.
Configuring Roaming User Profiles
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738596(WS.10).aspx
Group Policy Recommendations for Roaming User Profiles
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781862(v=ws.10).aspx
How to configure Roaming Profiles and Folder Redirection
http://www.grouppolicy.biz/2010/08/best-practice-roaming-profiles-and-folder-redirection-a-k-a-user-virtualization/
Best Regards,
Andy Qi
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Andy Qi
TechNet Community Support

How to set users level security profiles and auditing?

hi,
We are using EBS 12( 12.0.6 ) with database 10g (10.2.0.3) on Linux redhat 4.
I want to set the all user level and site level security profiles like user login attempts, password attempts, case sensitivity, and all these
infos and attempts should be audit.
Please also explain the empact of audit on running system?
Thx

I want to set the all user level and site level security profiles like user login attempts, password attempts, case sensitivity, and all these
infos and attempts should be audit. https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Profile+AND+Option+AND+API&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Profile+AND+Option+AND+Audit&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Please also explain the empact of audit on running system?https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Auditing+AND+FND+AND+Profile+AND+Option&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Try this in a TEST instance before you promote it to Production.
You will need to bounce the application services and enforce the users to sign off/on after setting those profile options.
Thanks,
Hussein

Issue with Total Number of SODs at user level.

Friends,
Quick question -
We are using GRC 5.3 Production on NT 20003 server. and back end systems are ECC 6.0
1.We added the Additional Role to one of the business users in ECC 6.0
2.We ran the FULL synch after adding this role in backend.
Issue : The total number of SODs did not change for users, even though the SODs for this business users did increase about 300.
Locations of Screen
Informer Tab ->> Risk Violoations.
Analysis Type -> Users
Does anyone has any idea how this numbers get interpreted?
The Total number of Violations for permission should increase, if user level SOD gets increased, as per our understanding.
PT

It should be in below sequence -
1. Full or incremental sync for user/role/profile
2. Full or incremental batch risk analysis for role/user/profile
3. Management report
The view you see is management report, which is based upon above jobs. FIrst jobs does high level sync like user/role/profile addition/deletion etc. Second job actually does risk analysis. Third one fills up the management view. If your batch risk analysis was run on Aug 30 aug 10 and management report after completion of the same, the report will show the same data till you run these jobs again even there are many changes in backend authorization.
Hope it clarifies your query.
Regards,
Sabita

How can we do personalization at User Level

Hi ,
I have extended a controller .
and I have to replace the seeded controller to extended controller using personalization at User Level.
Can any one suggest how can we do personalization at user level.
Regards,
Krishna.

Hi,
If you have extended controller then why don't you use profile option for restricting at user level.
In controller use as following :
processRequest(...)
super.processRequest(...);
String userProfile = pageContect.getProfile("Profile option name");
if(null!= userProfile && !"".equalsIgnoreCase(userProfile.trim()) && "userRestriction".equals(userProfile.trim()))
//do your changes
follow same in processFormRequest as well.
Once it is done...replace you controller at site level. It will only work for the users for whom the profile option is set.
Regards,
Mukesh Uchaniya

Restricting Authorizations to Variants at User level

Hi SAPians,
Can you help me to know how can I restrict variants to be displayed for particular users.?
Example: I am creating 5 variants in EMMACL transaction and give authorizations for the users only to particular Variants as below:
1. Variant1 --> Can be access by only users ERP-EHK, ERP-SAP & ERP-EJS
2. Variant2 --> Can be access by only users ERP-EAS & ERP-HJG.
3. Variant3 --> Can be access by only user ERP-EMM
4. Variant4 --> Can be access by only users ERP-EHK & ERP-UJY
5. Variant5 --> Can be access by only user ERP-EAS
Let me know how I can achieve the above requirement?

Hi,
i have assigned it at user level then why iam i
getting the currency code of site level ?Did you user to logout and login again after setting the profile option at the user level?
What if you set this profile option at the site/application/responsibility level, can you reproduce the issue then?
Thanks,
Hussein

Can we do personalization at user level under iprocurement

Hi,
Using the personalization i have enabled the exchang rate and exchange date for Non-catalog request items in iProcurement since, we are facing exchang rate issue.
i have enabled the personalization at responsibility level so all users are viewing the personalize fields. Now i want to restrict the personalize fields at the user levle. Is there any way i can do the personalization at the user levles?
Note: we are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
Please let me know..
Regards,
Kevin.

Hi,
There's another way apart from personalizations.
Hi Suppose you have two fields say A and B and two users David and Henry.
You want David should see both the fields and Henry shoudn't...
Then in that case in the controller of the page in process request you cvan capture the Username from profile option
String user = (String)pageContext.getUserName();
if("David".equals(user))
field A .setRendered(true);
field B .setRendered(true);
else if("Henry".equals(user))
field A .setRendered(false);
field B .setRendered(false);
You can proceed this way....
Thanks,
Gaurav

Controlling Task expiry at User Level programatically

Hi to all BPEL Guru's. Need some expert advice.
I am using Oracle SOA Suite 10.1.3.4 on weblogic server 9.2
The requirement given to me says that,
- Number of approvers for a task may vary on case to case bases, and needs to be pushed in the workflow as a set of parameters.
- Every user may have a different SLA to act on a given task.
To satisfy the first requirement my first approach was to use Sequential Approver Participant Type and push a comma seperated approver list to the workflow. But the issue with this approach is, associating a different expiry date to every user would be a big deal. And even if I find a way to get the associated expiry date, I would not be able to set it on user level, as the 'By Expression' is supported only at Global Expiration and Escalation Policy level and not at the Participant type level. Does anything click in your mind as a workaround to this? Appreciate your help. One workaround I can think about is to get handle of 'OnUpdated' callback and change the Global Expiration and Escalation policy everyime the task is updated.
The second approach was to have a defined set of 'Single Approver' participant types (i.e. Multiple Single Approvers)under 'Assignment and Routing Policy'. Here the dynamicity of number of approvers is lost. So I will have to design multiple workflows with a selected set of approvers. The workflow submitter can select the appropriate workflow and submit it. In this approach I can atleast associate an expiry date with a user in the incoming payload and assign to the single approver.
Not sure how to get out of it.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Many Thanks,
Vikas

Check Note: 364503.1 - How to Set a System Profile Value Without Logging in to the Applications
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=364503.1

Profile chance at user level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for