Profir center determination in non leading ledger in tcode ABAA

Hello experts,
We are working on ECC6.0 and parallel ledger is already activiated. To post the unplanned depreciation only in the non leading ledger, I have created new transaction type and attched it to non leading dpereciation area. After entring through transaction code ABAA, when I run ASKB to post the entry in the financial books, I get the profit cetner determination error. Entry is as under:
Depreciation A/c ..........Dr
To Accumualted Depreciation Account.
Now for depreication account being expense account and having cost element system is asking for the profit center (cost center).
My question is, how can I guide the system to determine the profit center from cost center mentioned in asset master data?
Please advise.
Shailesh

Dear sir,
Please check your seetings in T.code ACSET. Whether KOSTL as a account assignment object defined or not. If not then please make the entry, by doing so system will check the cost center in asset master and will pick the profit center maintained accordingly.
As well check account assignment type as a 02 Depreciation Run
I hope this may help and solve the issue.
Regards,
Pankaj A Bhalerao.

Similar Messages

Profti Center Determination for Non Leading Ledger

Hi,
We are on ECC6, EHP4. We have activated non leadgin ledger and I am facing issue in asset accounting transaction type for Write up, I have created for Non leading ledger (IFRS) . Following is the issue.
I have created the transaction type "Z71" and attached it to the "IFRS " depreication area. Whenever I post the write up entry and process it from "ASKB" with transaction type "Z71"I get the error "Balancing Field Profit Center in line item 001 not filled." Whenever I use transaction type which posts to both the ledger, entry gets posted correctly without any error.
What could be the issue, am I missing sometihing in configuration?
Please advise
Regards
Shailesh

Dear shilesh,
were you maintain profit center in Define document splitting characteristics for general leadger account
Pls reply me
Thanks & Regards
shankar

Document Split on Non Leading Ledger

Hi Friends,
Can we activate document split on Non leading Ledgers also?
Actually my client wants to maintain Leading ledger as per US GAAP and Non leading ledgers as per Schedule VI
So there is a requirement of activating document split on the non leading ledgers
Regards,
Ambuj Garg
+91-9739976912

Ok Think I should put my question differently
I have activated document split.....
Leading and Nonleading Ledgers are also in use
Now when i post a document it is split on the basis of Profit Center on the "OL" Leading Ledger view
While in the "NL" it is not split.
Is there a seperate setting for achieving document split in the Nonleading ledgers

New Gl- report with some details of CO for the non leading ledger

Hi,
I am using New GL. I have 2 ledgers (local ledger and USGAAP); The local ledger is the leading ledger, so is the one which impacts to CO. I need some information in CO (mainly cost center) for the non-leading ledger (USGAAP). I am thinking in create a report painter with the table of non-leading ledger, but I cannot find a table in NGL which save the CO object and can choose the ledger. I am looking too, this information by a standard report, but I cannot find one.
Any idea about a solution of this situation?
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi Cecilia, did you assign Cost Center scenario (FIN_CCA) to your ledgers?, otherwise NGL Tables (FAGLFLEXT and FAGLFLEXA) won't have Cost Center field populated. If this is the case, maybe your only option is use BKPF then BSEG + BSEG_ADD (Entry View of Accounting Document for Additional Ledgers) and pull Cost Center from there.
I hope this helps.

Cost center not updated when posting in non leading ledger

Hello FI Experts
I have two ledgers - Leading and Non Leading Ledger.
When I posted expense entry it updated both the ledgers and updated cost center value. This updated value i checked in cost center report KSB1.
For Ex: Rs. 1,00,000
Now I posted another expense entry in non leading ledger only. For Ex: Rs.50,000
How ever this entry didn't updated cost center report value. I checked in report KSB1
So I want to know:
1. Are there any cost center reports / profit center reports in controlling module where I can get non leading ledger specific amount in cost centers and profit centers
2. Is it possible to run assesment and distribution cycle, cost reposting and other CO transactions for non leading ledger amount
Deepak

Hi Deepak.
You can verify is the cost center was posted on document running tcode SE16N on the FALGFLEXA table, put the document number to do research.
After you can trying to post the new document through Tcode FB50L choosing or not a legder specific, then verify the document was posted correctly running the Tcodes SKb1 or Se16N with FAGLFLEXA table again.
Also you can check this link Checking the Allocation of General Ledgers to Cost Centres
Kind Regards
Jandoval Nascimento

Document splitting with non leading ledger activation

Hi experts,
Thanks for your advance help. we have activated document splitting in my company code pofit center is deriving proprly. for below entry.
1 31       503402     Vinayaka International Ltd.     4100     3,000.00-     0.00
2 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     2,000.00     0.00 4206
3 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     1,000.00     0.00 4207
system is deriving profit center like below.
000001 31 16011002     SUNDRY CREDITORS     2,000.00-     INR   4207
000002 40   53080019     BAD DEBTS WRITTEN OF     1,000.00     INR   4207
000003 40   53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     1,000.00     INR   4206
000004 50   19910001     INTER BRCH/DIVN A/C     1,000.00-     INR   4206
000005 40   19910001     INTER BRCH/DIVN A/C     1,000.00     INR   4207
in the same way i have activated document splitting in another company code with non leading ledger activation. and posting same transation
1 31       503402     Vinayaka International Ltd.     4100     3,000.00-     0.00
2 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     2,000.00     0.00 4206
3 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     1,000.00     0.00 4207
system is not deriving pofit center and it is giving the below error.
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
please advise any configration i have missed out.
any quaries please please let me know.
Regards

Hi Venkat,
Even in the first transaction, the profit center has not been determined by document splitting
if the profit center was derived by document splitting we would have seen 2 items for sundry creditors in the GL view
So check your document splitting settings for the corresponding document type, and transaction variant
the account category which includes vendor's recon accounts should be included in "item categories to be edited" list
Regards
Sach!n

Transfer of account assignment objects to non leading ledger in New GL

Hi Gurus,
I have implemented parallel accounting and have my leading ledger in INR and the non leading leading ledger in USD.
also i have the FI profit center and segment activated and for segmental reporting i am using the same.
I now need to report on segments in the non leading ledger also.
can i transfer the account assignments (like profit center and segment) to the non leading ledgers also.
regards

Hi,
Does this mean that once the scenerio is assigned in ledger in new gl i can do cost center allocations (assessment/distributions) in non leading ledger also?
eg i have parallel internal reporting system too.
if yes,
can you let me have config document for parallel accounting and scenerio assignment.
Regards,
Rishikesh

Parallel accounting cost objects in non leading ledger

Hi Gurus,
I have implemented parallel accounting and have my leading ledger in INR and the non leading leading ledger in USD.
also i have the FI profit center and segment activated and for segmental reporting i am using the same.
I now need to report on segments in the non leading ledger also.
can i transfer the account assignments (like profit center and segment) to the non leading ledgers also.
Points will be awarded
regards

I've tried it.
It works properly.
I created a movement type for Area 30 Only.
Anyway I had to modifyT093A: 30 IAS Depreciation Area now has '00' in filed WRTAFB."Adoption of values from depreciation area" like the Area 01.
I have to capitalize values (also negative; correction) only in Area 30 (IAS), not also in Area 01 (APC zero value).
There's no other way to obtain that?
Depreciation Area 01 (master area) 30 (IFRS)
APC 0 1000

Non-Leading Ledger Currency

Hi All,
It's a US company in China, but functional currency is USD.
So customer would like set local currency as USD. but from China GAAP reporting, we also need financial reports in RMB.
Leading ledger: 0L: For US GAAP,
1st local currency: USD
2nd local currency: Group currency profit center valuation -USD
3rd local currency:Group currency legal valuation -USD
Non-leading ledger: Z1 :For China GAAP
1st local currency: USD (should be same as leading ledger as SAP required)
My question is, how I could get China GAAP RMB report from SAP directly?
2nd and 3rd local currency of Z1 should be selected from currency types defined in leading edger.
If the solution is not available from 2nd and 3rd currency, are there any possible solutions?
Thank you ~
Lynni

Thank you Sanil,
Your proposal is current configuration.
But now functional currency for China company is USD.
Since main business is settled in USD (According to US GAAP or China GAAP)
And it is allowed to set local currency in other currency rather than RMB.
So if local currency is USD, then it will be more accurate for FI postings.
But we also need RMB report to meet local statuary report requirement.
Hope I explained it more clear.
Thanks.
Lynni

Posting in Non leading ledger .

Hi ,
I have posted a document in leading leadger and when I display docuemnt I can see cost centre and profit centre only in Leading ledger docuemnt .
I can can't see any acoount assignment in Non leading ledger why ?
please see attached docment in non leading ledger .

Hi Preeti,
Manikumar has indiated that you assign the scenarios to the Ledgers defined. The following scenarios are available, as you may know :
FIN_CCA
Cost Center Update
FIN_CONS
Preparations for Consolidation
FIN_GSBER
Business Area
FIN_PCA
Profit Center Update
FIN_SEGM
Segment Reporting
FIN_UKV
Cost of Sales Accounting
Whether the assignment is done for the Non-Leading Ledgers? Also include the versions for the Non-Leading Ledgers.
Also do the "Define and Activate Non-Leading Ledgers" step to activate non-leading ledgers for the company code.
Regards,
KBG

Function of non leading ledger

Hi
I am booking expenses in one company code and for management reporting distributing to another company code by cost centre distribution. During this process system is creating cross company code accounting document which we want to avoid.
I heard that we can not avoid cross company code transaction. But instead of posting entries into leading ledger, system can post these cross company code transaction into non leading ledger during cost centre distribution.
Is it possible? If yes, please guide me how. If not possible, any other way to achieve above result?
Following components are active in my system:-
1.Profit centre accounting
2.New GL functionality
3.FICO reconciliation
Please revert.
Regards
DD

Hi,
There is exactly only one leading ledger at client level. SAP Provides Leading Ledger with Standard System. Only the leading ledger passes and posts values to CO in the standard system. The Leading ledger manages additional currencies, Fiscal Year Variant and Posting Period Variant that are assigned to the company code. ONe are more SAP delivered scenarios(Cost Center/Business Area/Segment Update) are to leading ledger. These scenarios are updated in corresponding General Ledger view duriing the document posting.
In addition to the leading ledger, you can also define other, non-leading ledgers that are assigned currencies and/or fiscal year variants that differ from the leading ledger. Multiple/non-leading ledgers are useful for portraying accounting in accordance with different accounting principles(ex. Local and Tax accounting principles). It is not necessary to define Non-Leading ledgers even if you have it is not necessary to assign scenarios(mentioned earlier) to Non-Leading Ledgers.
Regards,
Krishna Kishore

Choosing the leading ledger-non-leading ledger

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Choosing the leading ledger- non leading ledger New GL

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia
Edited by: Cecilia Penelas on Dec 6, 2010 6:18 PM

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Subsequent Activation of Non Leading Ledger

Dear Experts,
We are now in 6.0 version of SAP with New GL and Profit Centre Document Splittings. Our Leading Ledger is for Local Indina GAAP. Now we want to create new non leading ledger for IFRS.
Whether we will take help of SAP for migration of old account balances beacuse we will create non leading ledger on 01.06.10 and we went go live on 01.02.2008.
Or we should take help of any consulting firm for implemnentation as we know any how for balance transfer to non leading ledger SAP migration tool to be used.
Please help.
Regards,
Alok

Hi,
Many different migration scenarios are imaginable for the transition from classic General
Ledger Accounting to new General Ledger Accounting, ranging from the straightforward
merge of existing ledgers to a totally new conception of accounting, such as the introduction
of segment reporting for compliance with new accounting principles. In particular in the case
of a new conception of accounting, there are two aspects to the transition to new General
Ledger Accounting: firstly, a conceptual business part, and secondly, a technical part dealing
with the migration of the existing accounting data to the new structures for General Ledger
Accounting.
The new features relate to very extensive changes, the transition to new General Ledger
Accounting is very complex, and the data volume involved is not to be underestimated. A
comprehensive analysis of your situation at the outset and the detailed planning of the
migration are crucial to the success of the migration.
We therefore recommend setting up an individual project for the migration,
entailing project phases, milestones, and so forth, and taking the appropriate
steps to ensure sufficient testing and training.
To achieve a high degree of safety in this respect, SAP accompanies each migration project
with the SAP General Ledger Migration Service. This mandatory technical service relates to
the standard migration scenarios and contains a scenario-specific General Ledger Migration
Cockpit and service sessions to ensure the quality of the data and of the migration project.
The service sessions are performed by the General Ledger Migration Back Office that has
been set up especially for this purpose.
Hence please contact SAP consulting for this Activity...
Regards
Manu
SAP GD

Opening balance upload in Leading and NOn leading ledger.

Hi All.
We are in the phase of opening balance upload. We are using Leading and Non leading ledger concept. Our Leading ledger starts on 29th of March 2009 as per UK reporting and Non leading ledger starts from 1st April to 31st of March as per India reporting.
We were going to upload the opening balance as on 22nd of Nov as per UK reporting. But here We stuck because as per India reporting our 2008 fiscal year has been closed on 31st of march 2009 also financial books has been closed. But due to UK reporting we are carrying 29th to 3st march 2009 P&L balances in Leading ledger which has been considered in the India Balance sheet ( has come in Profit and Loss Account).
Here I am not able to understand that how I should upload the 29th to 31st march P&L balances in leading ledger because if I will upload these through F-02 or FB50 BDC than these will effect the India balances also. If I am using the FB01l or FB50L to upload the Non leading ledger balances, than system is not allowed me to upload the balances in open item management accounts. System prompt me following message.
Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE012
Diagnosis
You use G/L account 213702 in company code 7041 with open item management. However, postings are not permitted to G/L accounts in individual ledgers with open item management.
Procedure
If you have not yet made any postings to this account and if the account is to be used for closing processes in non-leading ledgers, deactivate the Open Item Management indicator in the company code data for the G/L account.
Can any one tell me that how I can Achieve the same with correct P&L affect in Leading Ledger and correct effect in Non leading ledger Profit and loss account.
Appreciate your immediate response.
Many thanks

Hi
If your problem is solved, can you please let me know the solution for upload of customer, vendor and other open GL items in Non Leading Ledger.
Regards
Sourabh

Profir center determination in non leading ledger in tcode ABAA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for