PSE11 "Instant Fix" JPEG image quality

How can I set the Instant Fix mode to save as maximum JPEG image quality ?
thanks
Ian

Hi Ian
Open the image in Expert mode then select one of the auto-fixes from the Enhance menu.

Similar Messages

Save metadata in LR - degrade JPEG image quality?

Hi:
Does anyone know whether using the 'save metadata' feature in LR to save changed metadata to a JPEG file will result in a resaving of the entire file and/or otherwise degrade the JPEG image quality?
If it does not degrade the image quality, how does this feature work?
Many thanks for the help

Each pixel remains unchanged in this process.
I was under the impression that any re-saving of a jpeg image results in a slight loss of quality, regardless of whether there have been changes to the image
This is true for other editors, such as Photoshop or Photoshop Elements, but it is not true for Lightroom because, as explained, LR does things differently than other software.

JPEG Image Quality problem

Until yesterday, when saving an image as a JPEG I would click "Save As", select my folder and the Image Quality dialog box would pop up and I would then select 12/Maximum as the image quailty and hit "OK". Thereafter, every time I saved an image, Photoshop applied the same settings as the previous save i.e., 12/Maximum was pre-selected and I would just hit OK and move to my next image.
However, since yesterday Photoshop is no longer pre applying the last setting used and is defaulting to quality 8/High every time. Si everytime I save, I am now having to slide the slider to 12 which is kind of interrupting my work flow.
I have tried delete my preferences settings in the hope that this glitch would be fixed by resetting the program, but the problem persists.
Has anyone experienced this and how can I fix it?
Thanks.

AFAIK jpeg quality settings are sticky per file, not globally (at least inside Photoshop, but that association may not transfer between applications).
So if the files are out of a camera they probably already have a quality level assigned, and Photoshop is honoring that. Try a low setting on a test file and see what happens when you resave that. It should be the same.
And...oh, never mind. You probably know already...cumulative quality loss and so on...

Converting from .xls to .xlsx without losing jpeg image quality

I am trying to covert .xls to .xlsx. But I have a lot of jpegs in my .xls and I notice the image quality of the original jpegs is severely eroded. How do I preserve that -- click Option, Advanced, Do not Compress? Do I have to do it a file at a time?
Elwyn

Hi,
Unfortunately,this setting applies only to pictures in the current file or the file selected in the list next to Image Size and Quality.Please take a look the article below:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/excel-help/turn-off-picture-compression-HA010355184.aspx
Wind Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Converting appleworks document into jpeg - image quality

I am createing a project with some students where we have video taped book reviews. They have then created awards for these books using Applework 6.
I have had the kids save the certificates as jpeg2000 files using the best quality.
When I drag and drop the file into my iMoive - the image quality is really fuzzy.
1. Do I need to resize this image and if so what is the optimal size for iMovie?
2. Can I do this easily using iphoto or do I need a graphic converter?
Hope someone can help. Thanks Michael H.

iMovie is a DV editing app and anything imported to it must either already be .dv or it will be converted to .dv file format.
Your still image file will be turned into 30 frame per second "video" and also resized to NTSC dimensions.
QuickTime Pro can open image formats and can be used to make "movies". These are not dimensions limited and look just fine on a computer. Since the image is not rendered as "video" a single image file can stay one the screen as long as you like. Hundreds of times smaller in file size, too. Some of mine:
http://homepage.mac.com/kkirkster/03war/
http://homepage.mac.com/kkirkster/RedneckTexasXmas/index.html
http://homepage.mac.com/kkirkster/California/index.html

Does Export Version reduces image quality?

Hi,
I got smaller file size when I "export version" at "original size". My master was jpeg of 5.1MB and I exported in jpeg format, I got 3.6MB. If I "export master", I do get 5.1MB. What does Aperture do to the jpeg image that reduces the file size?
Then I played around with "image quality", which is 10 by default. If I set it to 11, I got a file of 4.1 MB, still smaller than the original 5.1MB. Set it to 12 I got a file of 10.4MB. I am kind of confused. I guess the "image quality" relates to degree of jpeg compression, and a 12 setting means that Aperture compresses the jpeg image at a lower compression ratio than my camera? Does Aperture uncompress jpeg image and re-compress it when "export version"?
The bottom line is, how do I preserve image quality after adjustments? In other words, I would like to export at the same image quality as my original photo, or as close as possible (I assume Aperture reduces jpeg image quality a bit every time I apply adjustments to the image via export). Thanks much for your time.

Wanderzhuanyou wrote:
2) When I make adjustments in Aperture I actually work on the image Aperture produces out of the master file - which should be about 73MB in my computer memory as the size of the image is 2848 x 4272 and Aperture works in 16 bit.
Internally, Core Image (which Aperture uses) actually works in 32-bit, but your basic idea is right.
3) When I export, Apertures compresses this 73MB image (assume adjustments don't make much difference to the image size) to a jpeg file.
First the image will be reduced to the bit depth of your export preset. Image adjustments will make quite a difference to the final file size because areas of high definition detail and a large tonal range will both increase the file size for a given compression setting. So any sharpening, for example, will increase the file size.
As a test, export an image with no sharpening applied, then add some edge sharpening and export it again. You should see a noticeable difference in file sizes.
Correct?
Pretty much.
Ian

Reduce image quality (and file size)

Is there a simple way to reduce the quality of all backgroung
images ? (there are all bitmap images, about 3 MB each of them)
I imagine that by reducing the image quality, the file size
will be less huge...
But I wasn't able to find a way to do that...
(the option about JPEG quality in project/preferences has no
effect, because all background images are bitmap... )
Any idea is welcome !
Valérie

Hi Valerie
I have been doing some research on this -- the issue of file
size (relating to both .cp and .swf) crops up a lot on this forum,
so I wanted to find out which were the critical factors relating to
images.
My findings show that there are two critical factors:
-- Slide Properties: Quality (High, Standard, JPEG,
Optimized)
-- Format of original image file (used for slide background
or inserted image object)
To summarize the results of my testing:
Slide Quality
Changing the slide quality from High
to Standard or JPEG makes little or no difference to the size of
the .cp file but can *significantly* reduce the size of the
.swf
This is an especially useful way of
dealing with the very large .swf file sizes caused by importing PPT
slides
A .swf consisting entirely of
imported PPT slides with complex backgrounds may be reduced to less
than 10% of its original size by changing the quality setting for
each of the slides to JPEG and using a JPEG image quality setting
of 75%.
Format of original image file
For complex images such as photos,
the best image file format to use is (oddly) .bmp -- although it
results in a larger .cp file than other file formats (such as .jpg
or .png), it generates the smallest .swf output.
The benefit of using the .bmp format
is less marked if you have set slide quality to Standard instead of
High, but it can still cut the file size of the .swf output by up
to 50%
For slides using a quality setting of
JPEG, there appears to be no difference in resulting .swf file size
between .bmp or any other image file format
A final comment: it is interesting to compare the size of the
.cp and resulting .swf for different Captivate projects. There is
typically an assumption that the .swf file will be smaller due to
compression. However, this is not always the case. For example, I
tested one project that used High slide quality and images that had
been inserted from .jpg files -- the generated .swf file was over 4
times larger than the .cp file. However, when I changed the quality
setting for all slides to JPEG, the .swf file reduced to less than
50% of the size of the .cp file.
I hope this information is helpful -- please contact me if
you'd like to see the detailed test data.
Best regards,
-Matthew Ellison

"Convert colors" degrades image quality?

I'm using Acrobat Professional 8 to convert a pdf file to the U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2 color space. Strangely enough, when executing the color convert, the JPEG image quality seems to degrade (see attached image). Is there any way to prevent or minimize this quality loss?

Okay do you have an original of the design.
try saving in 300 or 600 DPI create the pdf.
the try adding the Graphic
Click on Tools menu Content editing
next click on add image
locate the image.
Now place the image approximately where it should be.
then choose the image and place in desired area.
Save
see if image looks better.

Output image quality

Hi all,
I'm importing screen captures into Captivate as 24bit BMPs
and they look fine within the program. When I view the output the
images become totally banded and very low quality. They look like
indexed color GIFs. Can anyone explain what may be
happening?

Hi zumanu and welcome to our community
Assuming you are viewing your output at the same size you
recorded it, you might try the following:
Click Project > Preferences... > Preferences tab and
adjust the JPEG image quality value.
If that doesn't help, see if changing the properties of a few
slides makes a difference. From the Slide Properties dialog at the
Slide tab, click the Drop-down labeled "Quality" and adjust to a
higher quality setting.
Hope this helps some... Rick

Very Poor Image Quality In Viewer, JPEG Artifacts

I upgraded to Aperture 3 some time ago, and purchased a new Mac Pro specifically for this application. I am an amature/ sometime professional photographer and I have been using Aperture since Version 1. This weekend I finally had some time to sit down with Aperture 3 for some serious work with my scanned film images. These are large TIF masters scanned in with my Nikon CoolScan 9000. Some are medium format black & white Tri-X Pan images, others are 35mm, also black & white Tri-X Pan. Everything scanned in on the Nikon is at the maximum resolution for the master, on the theory that I can always bump it down later if that's necessary.
I am noticing vastly lower image quality in the viewer then with Aperture 2. Specifically, I am seeing massive JPEG artifacts in the viewer image then I have ever seen before. The images also render darker in the viewer then before. These artifacts do not appear when I export my images (say as JPEGS for posting to a web page), or when I print them. The quality of the exported and print images seem just fine and the exported JPEGS are completely free of the artifacts I am seeing in the viewer.
I have tried rebuilding the previews several times, experimenting with different quality settings. I have experimented with different proof profile settings. My printer is an Epson Stylus Photo R1800 and I have tried various paper settings for it as well as other proof profile settings such as the Adobe and Apple RGB settings and the generic grey profiles. Every time I change a setting I have forced a rebuild of the previews to no detectable effect. Nothing I do seems to have any effect whatsoever on the image quality in the viewer which remains relentlessly the same as it always was.
This poor viewer image quality is making it very difficult to work in Aperture 3. I suspect there is a setting somewhere like an easter egg in this new Aperture I haven't found yet but it is becoming very frustraiting and I could use a pointer because, again, nothing I have tried has changed the image quality in the viewer in any way I can detect and the photos look perfectly awful there...darker and loaded with JPEG artifacts. Things export and print just fine, but I need to see what I am going to get in the viewer or I can't do my work.

I interpret this as ... Eventually you should be looking at the Master with the Version changes applied. I'm assuming at this point, you aren't looking at the Preview. Since you don't need Previews to view and edit your images.
Yeah...that's sort of what I gleaned from that text. I was experimenting with the preview settings because I couldn't see any other way to fix the problem. What I'm hearing now is that the problem has no fix. If you scan in black & white film negatives (or anything else that's monochrome I suppose) with the color space set as gray scale you are asking for trouble. The sense I get from the text Gomez Addams referred me to is the behavior in that case is unpredictable, and furthermore film photographers aren't the customer base Apple is trying to cultivate with this product.
Aperture is designed to work with images from digital cameras which use an RGB color space...
Okay...fine. I have several digital cameras I occasionally use for professional work and I am here to tell you Aperture is an absolute blessing for that work. I do shoots every now and then for a local community newspaper and I would not want to live without this product. I remember back when I was a teenager in the 70s being up all night in the darkroom to get an assignment I'd had to cover right before deadline, and then go to my day job the next morning without any sleep. This is much better. And even with the personal art photography it is good to be able to just scan things in and make adjustments in the computer. You can do so much more. I would not want to go back.
But I reckon I need to find something I can rely on for my film work, or at least my black & white film work because as I read this Apple is not supporting film photography with this product and black & white film photography in particular and some of us still use film. No...scanning in my Tri-X negatives in the CoolScan as color produces weird results and anyway Photoshop and GIMP for goodness sakes seem to handle grayscale files just fine. Plus, I've already got thousands of those negatives scanned, I am not rescanning all that in RGB just to satisfy Aperture. The color slide film scans don't seem to be a problem, but that's now. I think I'm being told not to count on That always being the case either.
Aperture is designed to work with images from digital cameras...
Okay...fine...film is old technology after all, Nikon isn't even making their film scanners anymore...check the prices on the few still new-in-the-box ones left out there. My CoolScan 9000 is selling for twice on the second-hand market what I paid for it new and new it wasn't cheap. And yet it's not economically viable for Nikon to continue making them. Film is dying. But I still like working with film and film cameras and I reckon I'll keep doing that until I can't get any more of it and my stash of Tri-X Pan bulk rolls runs out.
Thank you all very much for your help. I think I see what I need to do now.

How do I control the quality of JPEG images?

I've written a program that scales a set of JPEG images down to various dimensions. I'm happy with the speed of execution, but quality of the images could be better. How do I specify the quality of the JPEG images I create? In graphics editors, I'm given the option of controlling the lossy-ness (?) of JPEGs when I save them, either reducing image qualify to shrink the file size or vice versa. How can I do this programmatically?
Thanks

Hi Jhm,
leaving aside the scaling algorithm, to save an arbitrary image with 100% quality you'd use
something like the following code snipet below
regards,
Owen
// Imports
import java.awt.image.*;
import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.*;
public boolean saveJPEG ( Image yourImage, String filename )
    boolean saved = false;
    BufferedImage bi = new BufferedImage ( yourImage.getWidth(null),
                                           yourImage.getHeight(null),
                                           BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB );
    Graphics2D g2 = bi.createGraphics();
    g2.drawImage ( yourImage, null, null );
    FileOutputStream out = null;
    try
        out = new FileOutputStream ( filename );
        JPEGImageEncoder encoder = JPEGCodec.createJPEGEncoder ( out );
        JPEGEncodeParam param = encoder.getDefaultJPEGEncodeParam ( bi );
        param.setQuality ( 1.0f, false );   // 100% high quality setting, no compression
        encoder.setJPEGEncodeParam ( param );
        encoder.encode ( bi );
        out.close();
        saved = true;
    catch ( Exception ex )
        System.out.println ("Error saving JPEG : " + ex.getMessage() );
    return ( saved );
}

Poor image quality? Why do Jpeg's look so bad?

If anyone has tips on how to improve the image quality of jpeg's in acrobat.com I'd really like to hear them. I've edited the images in Photoshop (CS4), exported them as jpeg's, and inserted them into my acrobat.com presentation. They look horrible, and there are many artifacts. If I insert the same image into Powerpoint, they look considerably better, but I'd prefer not to have to use it. Is there an image quality setting that I'm missing?
Thanks for any help,
Rob

Hi Rob,
Thanks for posting - and sorry you're having trouble. It sounds as though the image's quality is suffering because it's being down-sized upon insertion. In Presentations, any images larger than 1024 on a side are resized to fit within a 1024 bounds (we do this to optimize performance - important for a web application).
Here are some tips from one of our fine engineers:
For the best looking images, pre-scale your images to fit the size of the presentation before you upload them; for reference, the slide canvas is 720 pixels wide and 540 pixels tall. Any image larger than those dimensions is larger than it needs to be on the client so you and your audience are downloading more data than they will ever see. If you resize your images to fit the size it will appear on the screen, you will have a better looking image.
The choice of image format makes a difference at this scale as well. For image with smooth transitions like photographs of landscapes, jpeg is a good format. For computer generated diagrams like charts, or images with lots of details like text, PNG is a better format.
It is important that the image be scaled to the appropriate size before uploading because the server will recompress any image it needs to scale using JPEG compression. So if you are uploading a PNG image with transparency, you will loose any transparency effect if the image is large enough to require scaling on the server.
I hope this is helpful, Rob. Please let us know if you have any further questions.
Best regards,
Rebecca

Improve quality of JPEG images

Hi
I have an application which saves images in JPEG format after editing (well, many applications does that, but this is only a fraction of what this application does) :-)
I can't use any other formats due to size restrictions. The problem is Image Editing module of this application has operations like line drawing and text inserting. When I save the image, fine lines (especially texts) are getting blurred.
Is there any way I can increase the quality of JPEG files saved? I understand that JPEG is not meant for sharp lines and texts but with Photoshop, even fine lines and texts appear good when saved as a high quality JPEG file. Is there any such method in Java by which I can increase the quality of JPEG images?
Thanks in advance...

Is there any way I can increase the quality of JPEG files saved? I understand that JPEG is not meant for sharp lines and texts but with Photoshop, even fine lines and texts appear good when saved as a high quality JPEG file. Is there any such method in Java by which I can increase the quality of JPEG images?I JPEG is a non-conservative compression format (you do not get back exactly what you put in, it has "acceptable degredaton"--I talked with the author before it became popular and he explained what JPEG was all about--high compresses resulting in a small size for internet communications over dialup.
In more recent times I've seen quality factors brought into play with JPEG, but as you have stated, even in Adobe Photoshop under the highest quality, you still have degradation. I've seen some hint and some state that you can get a lossless JPEG, but I've not encountered it yet.
In any case, if you do find a "lossless JPEG" the size of that file is going to be bigger than you are looking at now. You may consider other file formats--TIFF or there are even more recent files formats that have higher conservative compression algorithms.

How to get a jpeg image to a movie with best possible quality

I've got a jpeg image from my 2 megapixel digital camera and I'm playing around with converting it to a movie. Yes, its a one image movie.
+QuickTime Pro+ does a superb job when I choose H.264, 1024 kb/s, but I can't get iMovie 5.0.2 to give me the same quality. This is what I have done:
1. Create a new movie as type MPEG-4.
2. Imported the jpeg image and adjust the time from 5 seconds to about 2 seconds.
3. Select Share, choose H.264, 1024 kb/s from the relevant option and after the movie making happens, the quality is obviously inferior to that from +QT Pro+.
*QUES 1*: Why is the quality inferior?
I have been to iMovie help and noticed this comment:
"When you import clips in a format different from your project, they are converted to the video format of your movie."
*QUES 2*: Is this why my jpeg image is losing quality? Is iMovie converting it to something else?
Further, when the jpeg image is first imported, it is assigned a clip time of 5 seconds. When I move one of the sliders to reduce the time to just a few seconds, I notice that a black band appears at the top of the image in the iMovie window and as I make the time smaller, the image zooms in and the black band becomes wider. Letterboxing at the top seems to be occuring. This I can't fathom.
*QUES 3*: Why does iMovie zoom in when I adjust time?
Any comments most appreciated, especially those that tell me if iMovie can make a movie from jpeg images with the same quality as QT Pro -- and how to do that.

Re the quality -- I think I have answered this one myself. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that when I select a video option (DV, HD 1080 and so on), iMovie sets up a frame size to suit, and the frame size that iMovie sets up for MPEG-4 happens to be 640 x 480, thus the poor quality of my jpegs when I selected that option. The poor quality had nothing to do with the MPEG-4 format.
Now the interesting things is, MPEG-4 is not limited to 640 x 480. It can be any size. So my question is:
Ques: Can I set up a movie within iMovie that is any size I want? QT Pro gave better results because it allows any size movie at all, and thus adjusted the movie size to my jpeg size (1800 x 1200 pixels) when I imported an image from my digital camera.
As it stands, not even the highest quality option in +iMovie 5.0.2+ (HD 1080) can handle the images from my piddly-little 2 megapixel camera.
Message was edited by: Guy Burns

Loosing quality of jpeg image

Hello,
I am inserting an image (jpeg) into reports 6i, using file->import->image : quality=good (tried excellent too), although original's quality is fine, it becomes awful when the report is generated. Any ideas?
Thanks
JP

Hello,
I am inserting an image (jpeg) into reports 6i, using file->import->image : quality=good (tried excellent too), although original's quality is fine, it becomes awful when the report is generated. Any ideas?
Thanks
JP

PSE11 "Instant Fix" JPEG image quality

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for