Purchase order enhancement is not effective

Hi Expert,
   I have a requirement about the purchase order. The requirement is that we must maintain the field collective no under the document header level. If there is no value exist , I can't print out the purchase order for the signature.
I have looked for the enhancement MM06E005, but it's not effective.  I have looked for the enhancement MM06E005, but it's not effective. Which method is fit for my requirement, badi or enhancement? If using the badi, please tell me the badi name and its relevant method.
   Thanks.
  George shi

Hello
There are badis related to PO
ME_ACTV_CANCEL_PO    BAdI for Activating the Cancel Function at Header Level 
ME_BAPI_PR_CHANGE_01 BAdI: Enjoy BAPIs for Purchase Requisitions (Method Chan
ME_BAPI_PR_CHANGE_02 BAdI: Enjoy BAPIs for Purchase Requisitions (Method Chan
ME_BAPI_PR_CREATE_01 BAdI: Enjoy BAPIs for Purchase Requisitions             
ME_BAPI_PR_CREATE_02 BAdI: Enjoy BAPIs for Purchase Requisitions (Method Crea
ME_BSART_DET         Change document type for automatically generated POs    
ME_CCP_BESWK_AUTH_CH BAdI for authorization checks for procuring plant       
ME_CCP_DEL_DURATION  Calc. of Delivery Duration in CCP Process (Not in Standa
ME_CHANGE_CHARACTER  Customer-Specific Characteristics for Product Allocation
ME_CHDOC_ACTIVE      Activation of Further Change Document Updates           
ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS   Run Through Items Again in the Event of Changes in EKKO 
ME_CHECK_SOURCES     Additional Checks in Source Determination/Checking      
ME_CIN_LEINRF2R      BADI for CIN India - Delivery charges                   
ME_CIN_LEINRF2V      BADI for LEINRF03 excise_invoice_details                
ME_CIN_MM06EFKO      Copy PO data for use by Country version India           
ME_CIP_ALLOW_CHANGE  Configuration in Purchasing: Changeability Control      
ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE   Control of Pricing Type: Additional Fields              
ME_GUI_PO_CUST       Customer's Own Screens in Enjoy Purchase Order          
ME_HOLD_PO           Hold Enjoy Purchase Orders: Activation/Deactivation     
ME_OUTBOUND_SAVED    Outbound message saved                                  
ME_PO_SC_SRV         BAdI: Service Tab Page for Subcontracting               
ME_PROCESS_COMP      Processing of Component Default Data at Time of GR: Cust
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST   Enhancements for Processing Enjoy Purchase Order: Custom
ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST  Enhancements for Processing Enjoy PReqs: Customer       
ME_PURCHDOC_POSTED   Purchasing Document Posted                              
ME_REQ_APPROVAL      Control of Buyer Approval After Changes to PReq Item    
ME_REQ_HEADER_TEXT   Copy Header Text: Enjoy Purchase Requisition           
ME_REQ_NEW_VERSION   Trigger new purchase requisition version               
ME_REQ_OI_EXT        Commitment Update in the Case of External Requisitions 
ME_REQ_POSTED        Purchase Requisition Posted                            
ME_TAX_FROM_ADDRESS  Tax jurisdiction code taken from address               
ME_TRIGGER_ATP       Triggers New ATP for Changes in EKKO, EKPO, EKPV       
MEREP_RSLTHNDL2      SAP Mobile: BAdI definition for Result Handling        
MEREP_RUNTM_LD2      SAP Mobile: BAdI definition for Runtime Loader         
MESSAGES_RFW         Badi for error handling RFW                            
METH_FOBU_CONNECTOR  Appl. Specific Functions for Formula Builder Method Impl
METH_FOEV_CONNECTOR  Appl. Spec. Functions for FB Method Implementations    
Thanks
Anirudh Saini

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Order history is not updated with Invoice number

    Hello Experts ,
    Please suggest some inputs/solution for my problem.
    Scenarios is :
    PO --> SO --> Invoice
    I am creating the invoice with the medium EDI , when I click on Save button IDOC is generated with the message " IDoc 'xxxxxxxxxxxxx' was created and forwarded for transmission " and it showing the status as 03 i.e, The IDoc was sent to an R/3 System or an external program via a transactional RFC ...but the problem is if I got to the Purchase Order history Its not updated with the Invoice number.
    What could be the problem , please suggest.

    Hi!
    I'm not sure, in which process you link PO and SO. There are some different ways, which are totally different scenarios - if you need help here, describe more detailed.
    Your invoice is probably only created with reference to SO, so check the invoice itself. In this case also the SO history should include the invoice.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

    Hi,
    I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
    The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
    As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
    Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys   in chart of accounts WP2P.
    Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
    Please help me how to solve this.
    Regards,
    Rashmi

    Hiya,
    This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
    You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
    VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
    Cheers.

  • Purchase Order Net Price not editable after GR/IR

    Hi Friends!
    I am facing a problem that, I want the price of the Purchase Order document should not be changed after the GR or IR is posted for this document.
    I have checked that making the net price field as display or M/06 is not the solution of the above mentioned problem.
    Can anyone help?

    Hi,
    If you want the price not to be changeable, set the tolerances in the IMG menu:
    MM -> PUR -> PO -> Set tolerance limits.
    Cheers

  • While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, please any one help me

    While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, what are the requirements need to display into tcode f.13, please any one help me, i am facing this problem in  production server

    Hi Nattu,
    Please check it will show the PO no under Purchasing doc field
    Check which layout you are applied.
    its should be
    SAP&F124
    Without Specification of Crcy
    Regd,
    Khan.

  • Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
    Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
    Could any body guide me?
    Thanks
    Trupti

    Hi,                                                                               
    It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
    So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
    1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
    2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
    3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
    4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
    So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked  the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
    Best Regards,
    Silky
    Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

  • Purchase Order 4500000 does not exist

    When I am creating Service PO from shipment I am getting the error
    "Purchase order 4500000001  does not exist
    What can be the reason??????????
    Regards.

    Dear All,
    At last the problem has been resolved.
    There was an userexit assigned to the no.range table where the new doc.type was hardcoded to bypass the logic for allotting a PO Number and the problem was resolved.
    Since the problem has been resolved I am closing the thread.
    THANKS EVERYBODY FOR YOUR VALUABLE INPUTS AND SUGGESTION.
    Regards.

  • Purchase Order item text not present in accounting documents after MIGO

    Hello all,
    in ECC 5.0 I create a PO using ME21N. Afterwards the GR is done with MIGO.
    For the moment the PO item text is not transferred to the FI documents. The field BESEG-SGTXT is empty. Is there a possibility to copy the text during GR from the PO item to SGTXT?
    In fact I am looking for a customizing path and not a User Exit.
    Thanks and regards
    AD

    Hi,
    You can fill the field header text on the 'Details' tab
    (This is field INVFO-BKTXT) and this field will be copied into
    the FI document fields BSEG-SGTXT for the vendor line and BKPF-BKTXT.
    You can fill directly the field SGTXT for the account lines ( if you
    post directly to an account) and for the purchase order lines."
    Also please review attached notes.
    453027     MIRO: Segment text for vendor line
    366412     MIRO: Enhancement LMR1M004 item text
    MIRO and the FI Enjoy transactions were designed seperately to meet the
    needs of their respective components - FI and MM. As they were not
    designed in conjunction, there are differences in their functionality.
    Not all information in one component will be updated in the other.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda
    Please also review attached note 42615 as this explains how settings
    in transaction ob14/ob41 effect the field INVFO-SGTXT in Miro.

  • BAPI for purchase order enhancement in DMS

    hi, guru,
    one of the client requirement is,
    Is there any BAPI s for enhance ment of DMS and Purchase order FUnctionalities?
    points!!!!!!!!!!1

    Hi,
    regarding the DMS BAPIs please see the transaction BAPI in your system or the SAP note 766277 which contains a complete documentation on all DMS BAPIs.
    Best regards,
    Christoph

  • Purchase Order Quantity should not be more than PR quantity

    Dear all,
    We want to control Purchase Order quantity against Purchase Requisition.
    We have configured message setting 00 076 as  ERROR. when we create Material PR for lets say 100 quantity. When we create single or multiple Material PO against this PR for more than 100 quantity system is giving us error. This is exactly what we needed.
    But due to this message setting when we create Service PR and give service quantity lets say 100. and when we create Service PO and give Service quantity 60. First time system is allowing to save the Service PO.
    When we create another Service PO with reference to same Service PR system is showing error as we have configured. Even though quantity 40 is still available.
    What we want is to have control on quantity of Purchase Order for Material as well as service. Quantity should not be more than PR quantity.
    Is there any other way to have such control? please provide other available options to configure.
    Regards
    Kant

    Hi,
    06 076 is only for applicable only in case of material.
    For Service and material both, use 06 400 as error "Materials/services for requisition & & already ordered with & &"
    NOtes 786736
    This may help u !
    Regards,
    Pardeep malik

  • Return Purchase Orders- CESS ACCOUNT NOT GET Debited in MIGO

    Dear Expert,
    We are implementing Return PO procedure for Materials.
    Business scenario :
    Goods received from vendor during Material receipt Stock Account debited and GR/IR Clearing account Credited and Cess account Credited further during Invoice Posting Material Vendor is Credited with debiting GR/IR Clearing account and Cess Vendor is get Credited by debiting CESS account
    In Case of Return Purchase Order we are sending Materials back to Vendor during Goods Issue to Vendor Stock Account Credited and GR/IR Clearing account debited but Cess account get Credited insted of debited,
    Please advice what setting can be done to debit CESS Account during goods return
    Regards,

    Hi
    Thanks for reply, vendor has to pay duty to govt if vendor is not belong to factory location
    during GR for outside vendors pay duty to govt  but naw we want to return materials to vendor at this time we also want to recover duty paid to govt.
    to make this possible we have Created vendor code for Govt creditor and condition is created with feature of delivery cost
    goods are return to vendor by creating Return PO ( as no reference document available ) and goods issue with movment type 161.
    Pls advice

  • In Purchase order history is not showing the Reversal of goods price

    Hello friends,
    I have created a PO , for that i have done the GR and invoice. Now i want to reverse the goods using MType-102, for that i have created the credit memo .
    I have done the reverse GR ,But in Purchase order history the For the GR reversed doc, its showing the price as 0.
    Pl help me out .

    Hi,
    If your forward 101 material document is with price and it is showing in PO history and your reverse 102 material document is not with price in PO history , check the accounting document of 102 and if it is with price , then PO history is not properly updated.also check table EKBE and if po history is not properly updated , check for a relevant note and apply.
    Regards,

  • Account-assigned purchase order KBS is not activated

    Hi Friends,
    please expalin me maintain FI configuration; automatic postings procedures Account-assigned purchase order KBS transction  account detemination is not activated.
    Thanks
    E.vasu

    Hi,
    KBS  only define posting key (to which account the postings  to happaen).In  any account assign purchase order,  system prompted to enter GL account (and CO object), which  defined the account posting. Ex: Check in OMJJ - For mvt type 101 - update control - GR for acct. assgt. (consumption indicator V with quantity and value updation) - system defines postings as KBS and WRX, KBS refers to the consumption GL account.
    KBS key doesnt require any additional settings in OBYC. It only looks for account specification in PO (say K /C/P) and GL account and can be assigned in OKB9 T.code.When  we do GR for  PO with account assign {KBS (consumption)}, it will debit the given GL account (assigned in OKB9 t.code) and credit GR/IR account (which define in OBYC).
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • MIRO based on purchase order and delivery note

    Hi
    It seems I can do a supplier invoice based on PO or some POs.
    I can also do a supplier invoice based on delivery note or some delivery notes.
    But I can not do MIRO based on delivery note AND purchase order.
    Business scenario: I need this when I have supplier invoice with a lot of lines based on a lot of different PO and different PO lines. The delivery note consolidate together all this different lines. Together with these lines I want to add another item of non good receipt item, so there is no delivery note.
    I want to add this item with a reference to the PO line in addition to the lines that were created with a reference to a delivery note.
    Thanks
    Ofer

    Thanks,
    I want to use PO reference for specific PO and delivery note for other PO in the same invoice.
    The problem is I cant use delivery note for the other PO cause there is no MIGO there.
    Thanks
    Ofer

  • Purchase Order History Reference not filled

    Hello everyone,
    we are using BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE to create an invoice for an purchase order. It works just fine except that there no Reference filled in the Purchase Order History. We fill the number of the reference to the BAPI (headerdata-ref_doc_no) and the reference is visible on the created FI document as expected.
    However the customer insists, that it has to be visible in the field Reference of the Purchase Order History as well. I know, it is the XBLNR field of the table BSEG. I dug deep in the source codes to find out, where is the problem, but setting of this field seems to be very complicated. Someone told me, that the field is only filled when the GR-Based Invoice Verification is checked (which in our case is not).
    Can someone tell me the rules, when the field Reference gets filled? Or (if there is anything) how to customize the system, co make this field filled?

    Hi Oleg,
    thank you for your reaction.
    I am aware of that there is a field XBLNR in the BKPF table - and there we have the reference filled correctly (it is visible on the FI document as I mentoined). However in the BSEG table is the XBLNR as well and it is related to displaying Reference in the Purchase Order History (the bseg relates to an PO item) at least in our case. When I manually input in the BSEG-XBLNR a value (via SE16N for example), it displays afterwards in the required field when viewing the Purchase order.
    In the case GR-Based Invoice Verification procedure and the table MKPF - i believe, you are right there (so the Reference is filled), however this is unfortunatelly not our case.
    What I am trying to find out are the conditions, under which the XBLNR in BSEG is filled (I can tell you, what source codes I have been inspecting, but I got lost after I while, because there are literally thousands of lines of code:-(

Maybe you are looking for