Purchase Order is not deleted after archive process

Hi,
I want to delete completely a specific purchase order from the system so I followed the next steps to do that but is not working.. not sure if I'm doing something wrong.
Steps:
1) I marked up the PO as deleted in the ME22 transaction:
2) In the transaction SARA I followed these steps:
Step 1: Create variant for Archiving. Give it a name. Enter your PO number. Flag One step procedure. Flag detailed log. Erase flag for test run.
Step 2: Maintain your start date, you can use Immediate in such a small case.
Step 3: Maintain spool parameters. Enter your printer and set the values if you want to print immediatly and if you want keep the print. I suggest to hold the spool in the system. This helps you to determine any error.
Step 4. Execute the variant.
3) If I go to the transaction ME23N it says that the PO is archived but is there yet. Also, I can see it in the "Docuement Overview". How can I delete this PO completely from the system??
Thanks for the help!!

HI Carlos,
Since you archived PO, it is stored in archive physical drive not in SAP drive.
when u use me23n, the archived PO is picking from physical drive and it says "Already archived" message.
I'm sure there will be no table level entries for the archived documents
Go to SARA transaction - information system--> Archive Explorer - MM_EKKO and execute.
Check your PO is listed here.
So if you dont want to see your PO, then you need to De-activate information system
in SARA-Information System-->Customizing -
search infrastructure by Object name and use activate/deactivate icon -
A question i really need to know - Why you want to delete a particular PO, Archival process is not a small thing and usually it takes place as a MASS activity.
reg,
bhg

Similar Messages

  • F110 - Payment order number not deleted after Feban posting

    Hello,
    I have problem regarding Payment order deletion. End user creates Bank statement (FF67) using Payment order(F110) number. Then with Feban end user posts document. Normally after Feban posting payment order number disappearing (we can see this number in tables such pyordh, reguh et c.). If we want to see Payment order number (using t-code F110) system gives such error - "No payment orders exist for this selection
    Message no. FZ084
    Diagnosis
    No payment orders exist for the selections made. This may be because the relevant account statement has already been imported".
    But in this case it is not disappeared and end user can use Payment order number second time in t-code FF67 and post in in Feban.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sabuhi Gaflanov

    HI Carlos,
    Since you archived PO, it is stored in archive physical drive not in SAP drive.
    when u use me23n, the archived PO is picking from physical drive and it says "Already archived" message.
    I'm sure there will be no table level entries for the archived documents
    Go to SARA transaction - information system--> Archive Explorer - MM_EKKO and execute.
    Check your PO is listed here.
    So if you dont want to see your PO, then you need to De-activate information system
    in SARA-Information System-->Customizing -
    search infrastructure by Object name and use activate/deactivate icon -
    A question i really need to know - Why you want to delete a particular PO, Archival process is not a small thing and usually it takes place as a MASS activity.
    reg,
    bhg

  • Reg  Order reservation not deleting after PGI (VL01N)

    Hi All,
    ETO scenario, For production, reservation will be create through WBS element. After production , If I do delivery and PGI,  production order reservation is not deleting.
    Same material If I do delivery(LP) through CNS0, then order reservation is going to delete after PGI. But Sales order price is not copying to Billing If I follow this process.
    Is there any copy controls to flow the sales price to billing when delivery happens through CNS0. If not
    Which requirement class and movement type I need to determine in Sales order.
    With regards,
    Prasad.
    Edited by: SDGURU on Feb 9, 2011 10:50 AM
    Edited by: SDGURU on Feb 9, 2011 10:51 AM
    Edited by: SDGURU on Feb 9, 2011 11:14 AM

    Hi All,
    Please do need full.
    Regards,
    Prasad.

  • Purchase Order line items deleted after coying from PO in GRPO

    Hi All,
    Does anyone here experienced this problem? The user reported that after adding the GRPO that generated by copying from PO, they found out that the line items in PO has been deleted? We're trying to reproduce this problem but we're unable to reproduce it.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vin

    Hi Melvin,
    Which version of SAP B1 you are working on ?
    So if your PO item lines are deleted when copying to GRPO are you able to track the Base document from the GRPO. having the particular GRPO opened enable the form settingsa and make visble the Basetype and the other fields and check if the PO No. is available.
    If this is a one of issue or you experience the same then thsi issue can be reported. If you have a back up of the DB before this transaction of PO copied into PO, restore the backup and check if the same applies.
    Regards,
    Rakesh N

  • Process Order Deletion and Archiving process

    Hi all,
    I just want to ask what is the proper process in deleting and archiving process orders and what are the possible impacts on the other modules?
    Thanks!

    Using SARA, Archiving object is PR_ORDER or t-code COAC.  Follow the step pre-process, write archive file, and delete from database.
    I don't recall any prerequisite for archiving process orders.   However, costing guys/girls often yelled to keep process orders for a very long while so you might want to check with their requirement (Note that archiving is more business-oriented than you think).
    Before you can do so, you must follow the steps of process order life cycle (from create, release, tech.comp., close, deletion flag, deletion indicator, accordingly).
    For deletion flag, and deletion indicator, you can set via COAC t-code.  There is a set up for period lapse between deletion flag to deletion indicator to archive in order type configuration (residence time 1, 2).  Process order, for example,  must reside in database for 1 month after deletion flag and another 1 month after deletion indicator before you can archive them out if you set residence time 1,2 to 1.
    Hope it helps.

  • Document in transfer for purchase order - creation not possible

    Hi Experts,
    we get this error when we do confirmation"'document in transfer for purchase order - creation not possible'"
    any inputs are appreciated
    Rg
    sam

    Hi All,
    We have resolved the above problem.
    When user does confirmation ,if it sucessfully  created then there will be  no entry in BBP_Document_tab table.If it's in error in process and next time when user tries to do GR then he will encounter a pop up message "Document in transfer for PO, creation not possible".
    So we need to delete the entries from table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB using FM BBP_DELETE_FROM_DOCUMENT_TAB.
    Then check again in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB now there will be noentry there...so now user can do the confirmation from SRM,he will not encounter this error now.
    Thanks to all the ppl who has replied
    sameer

  • Purchase Order Response Not able to do by the Supplier from SUS

    Hi Experts,
    During sometimes, the supplier is not in a position to make POR from SUS.
    After selecting the PO from Supplier side, when they are trying to do POR they are not able to either select Confirm (tick mark) or reject (X mark) from their screen which means always those buttons are in greyed mode or no action like Green or Red respectively. What could be the reason ? However, they can see the Send button.
    Please provide me the input to do investigation.
    Thanks
    Rajesh K

    Hi Rajesh,
       If you are not able to respond for PO from SUS then you have to activate the workflow WS14500001.. Here some more workflows you can check for POR
    Workflows
    You can configure the following workflows for the purchase order response:
    ·        (WS14500001)
    Automatic transfer of purchase order response data into the purchase order. The system carries out a comparison during the data transfer (background processing). If the quantity, price, and delivery date variances transmitted by the vendor are within the tolerance limits set in Customizing, and no other variances are transmitted, then the data transfer of the first inbound POR occurs automatically.
    This workflow is relevant for XML receipt or manual entry with subsequent approval.
    ·        (WS14500019)
    If POR data differs from that in the purchase order, you can be informed of this via a work item. As a purchaser, you can decide for each item whether you wish to transfer the data into the purchase order or not.
    ·        (WS14500007)
    If POR data differs from that in the purchase order, you can be informed of this via e-mail (with the number of the purchase order).
    ·        (WS14500017)
    Monitoring receipt of the purchase order response:
    If the flag Purchase order response expected is set in the purchase order, and if by a certain time a purchase order response has not been received for all items in a purchase order, then you can be informed of this via a work item.
    SAP WON'T DELIVER ANY WF TEMPLATE WITH NUMBER RANGE OF '9' BECAUSE 99% CUSTOMER USE NUMBER RANGE 9' FOR CUSTOM WORKFLOW..
    Saravanan

  • PURCHASE ORDER STATUS :When Deleting ALL ITEMS.

    Hi experts,
    I need  to make purchase order status stay  " Release Compleated " when deleting all items.
    Anyone Know How to do it?
    Or anyone Know how to use BAPI_PO_CHANGE in BAdI : ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST 
    In my project , I use Release Strategy of purchase orders, and there is a case of deleting all items.
    In this situation, purchase order status returns to "Active " and release strategy tab disappears.
    This is our problem.
    I need to make purchase order status stay  " Release Compleated " and prevent  release strategy tab disappearing.
    I tried to update the fields EREKZ(final invoice) and ELIKZ(delivery completed) in
    BAdI : ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST  Method : PROCESS_ITEM using BAPI_PO_CHANGE according to SAP Note 456691.
    But BAPI_PO_CHANGE couldn't update EREKZ because of our customize , and I couldn't find how to use
    BAPI_PO_CHANGE in the BAdI.
    Anyone know solutions to solve this problem?
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    TKD

    Hi,
    please review the following information in SAP Note No. 456691 as
    copied below:
    18. Question:
    When are the header conditions updated if a purchase order item is
    deleted?
    Answer:
    If a purchase order item is deleted, the item is marked as 'statistical'
    (field EKPO-STAPO = X) and the change is reflected in the header
    conditions.
    However, if for the item the final invoice indicator(EKPO-EREKZ) or the
    inward delivery completed indicator (EKPO-ELIKZ) is set, the item is not
    marked as 'statistical' (EKPO-STAPO is not set) and thus the header
    conditions are not updated.
    I hope this helps you
    BR
    Nadia Orlandi

  • MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

    Hi,
    while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
    it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
    Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
    Please clarity

    Hi,
    Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could  due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.                                                                               
    This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
    589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :                                                                               
    "Implement the program correction.                                       
    With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:        
    Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".         
    After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an        
    inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with                   
    BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a        
    confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394         
    "Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".                                                                               
    Hope this can explain the error you met.
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • Purchase order yet not released

    Hi sap gurus,
    i have done purchse order .then i am creating goods receipt for that purchase order but i am getting these error purchase order yet not released.plz tell me how can i solve these problem

    Hi Prasad
    Its simple prasad ur PO is suject to release strategy (Approval process) so the authorized person has to release the PO through the following process -
    Just go to Transaction ME29N or ME28, enter ur PO no.
    If u follow ME28 give ur release grp / code enetr PO no. and execute ur PO will be reflected in the list put the cursor there and press Release+Save Iconit will release the PO and then u will able make the GR.
    If u follow ME29N then give ur PO no. and go to release tab at the header level and press release icon.
    Best regards
    Vineet Baweja

  • Error of PO - "Purchase Order Does not exists"

    Dear Experts,
    Here i am facing one error of Purchase Order Creation and its further processing.
    I have created purchase order and saved it, system issued message that, Purchase Order XYZ is created. (I have taken trial for 2-3 Purchase orders).
    When, i am posting Goods Receipt for the PO, system is issuing the error message, Purchase Order does not exists.
    Also in ME2M (PO list display) and Me23N (Display PO),
    system is issuing the same message - Purchase Order Does not exists, but in PO Creation it is generating Purchase order normally.
    Here is no matter of release strategy, because, PO release is not configured.
    Dear Experts, Please guide me on the issue !
    Thanks in advance !!!!

    there can be hundred of different reason for a failure. Most common reason is a problem with the number ranges, e.g. system tries to create a record with a number that is already there.
    This can happen if the number range was reset (or transported from a developement system).
    But transaction SM13 gives you all the details.
    There you see a line for each posting failure. Double click this  line again to get more details.
    There you will certainly find a line in red that indicates in which function the failure ocured.
    Double click this red line to get more info. Use the buttons above to see the content of the posting. For some failures you can create a dump that gives you much more details.
    Best you sit together with an ABAPer who can certainly tell you more how to read a dump and how to find the reason.

  • Document is in transfer for purchase order.Creation not possible

    Dear All,
    We did partial confirmation in EBP and later when trying to do confiramtion for the remaining quantiy getting the message"document is in transfer for purchase order.Creation not possible"
    We are taking this problem in production as well as in quality systems also.
    What are possible reason and how to solve it.
    kindly share your views.
    Thank you.

    Hi yshu,
    use tcode bd87 in SRM to check for failed confirmation IDOC (type MBGMCR).
    The double click the status record to see the exact cause of the failure.
    Rectify the error. Then try to execute the IDOC from BD87 tcode.
    For a few errors you may not be able to execute the IDOC but to create a new confirmation in SRM. In such cases, follow the below procedure..
    There should be an entry for the confirmation in the transfer table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB in SRM. Display the details.
    Then run FM "BBP_DELETE_FROM_DOCUMENT_TAB" to delete the entry from the doc tab table.
    Then post a new confirmation in SRM.
    There is also a FM in SRM using which you can change the status of thefailed IDOC from 51 to 68 or 31.
    Rgds,
    MJ

  • Purchase order confirmation not visible

    Hello,
      I insert a confirmation at purchase order position level. After saving, the confirmation row disappear. I try to insert it again but I receive a dump with DUP_REC insert in table EKES. I check the table and the row is present. What's happens.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello Antonio,
    I don't know your release, but, please, kindly review note attached as a possible solution to solve 
    this issue.                                                                               
    1002238   -> Vendor confirmations are not displayed                                                                               
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • Error in MR11: One or more purchase orders were not updated

    Dear Gurus,
    While posting MR11 for a account assigned purchase order i'm facing a error as "One or more purchase orders were not updated" under message ID CKMLGRIR 003.
    Diagnosis: An error occurred during the update. As a result, an entire processing package of purchase orders could not be cleared.
    I checked with the PO and it looks correct.
    What may cause this issue? I'm using 4.6C release.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    RathiM

    Please check the SAP note below  :
    843022  MR11: Error log, purchase order number is missing

  • TPS file is not deleted after FrameMaker creates PDFs via Acrobat 8

    Using FrameMaker 7.2 build 158, and Adobe Acrobat 8, when creating PDF files, the temporary PostScript file (*.tps), which is created before the final PDF, is not deleted after the creation of the PDF is complete.
    This is a big deal for us because we are using a tool which hooks into the PDF-creation of FrameMaker/Distiller, and is reliant on this TPS file being deleted.
    Is this a known bug? Does Adobe know about this? Do any other users have workarounds for this?

    Thomas,
    FWIW, speaking from experience with the Save As route, I've seen
    random "phunnies" in the final PDFs (such as the missing fonts
    issues), a bigger .tps file than the .ps file generated from directly
    printing to file, slower throughput in both the intermediate
    postscript file creation and actual distilling (probably tied in to
    the larger .tps file) and other differences from what the joboptions
    should have been.
    There should not have been any differences in the file sizes being
    created if the same printer instance/configuration was actually being
    used. I also see this on some automated runs with Miramo. It's not
    consistent either - sometimes it works fine and then the next run, the
    process is considerably slower and there are dropouts in the PDFs.
    So far, manually printing to a ps file and distilling always seems to
    work without any issues.
    Your mileage may vary.
    Arnis

Maybe you are looking for

  • TS2972 I downloaded text me ap from the itunes store onto my computer but it won't open, how do I use it?

    Hello I just downloaded "text me" ap from the itunes store to my desktop computer, but it won't open!!  How do I use it?  I tried right clicking and double clicking but nothing happens... Please advise. Corinne

  • How can I get Itunes7 back on my computer after a hard drive crash?

    I really don't want to be forced to go to Itunes 8. Was very satisfied with using version 7. I still hear there are many problems with version 8. I still have the CD for version 6. Would it be better, or more safe to stay with 6? But I liked the feat

  • Searching on data element

    Is there a way to perform a sort and a search against the data element of my key / value pair? I have a DB that I use to track some remote files. I have an ID that I use as the key to my key value pair that points me to a given file. This must be uni

  • JVM reserves additional memory after object creation

    Hi everybody, i have a problem with starting the JVM from inside a C++application. Starting the VM with JNI_CreateJavaVM works as aspected. When creating the first object it seems like the JVM reserves additional memory (outside the heap). Here is a

  • Java, UML and Eclipse ?

    Hi to everyone, I'm new to the forum, as well as Java. I'm currently learning from a Deitel Book (How to program in Java) and some links I've found in this Forum. I'm using Eclipse (OS X version), after having used pico and terminal commands to learn