Purchasing info record 5300000013    flagged for deletion

Hi,
While changing the Purchasing info record , we get the following message:
Purchasing info record 5300000013    flagged for deletion as a warning
We want to convert this message as error. For that we changed the System message category, purchasing as "E" in Materials Management-> Purchasing-> Environment Data-> Define Attributes of System Messages, but after that also the System gives a warning message in T Code ME12.
Where do I need to change to get the error message? As per understanding, the system should always warning message so that we can change the deletion flag, if required in future.
Please guide.
Regards,
PK

hi,
Try to understand the importance of the message. PIR document is not must to make or create any PO...
but in case if req. or for copying few parameters from old/latest PIR, we use it...
Its always better to have the PIR for the PO, which may be made before or after the generation PO...as it stores the PO price history, conditions etc...which may get updated and pulled whenever required...
So, due to such reasons system has made this message as warning message...because you can use it just for record maintainance, but it will be of no use if thinking practically...
Normally we make these settings at SPRO >> IMG>>MM Purchasing>>Environment data>> Define attributes of system messages...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Similar Messages

  • Purchasing Info Record last document references deleted PO

    We created a PO line with a material which updated the purchasing info record. Subsequently we marked the PO line for deletion. However when I use ME12 to look at the PIR, under the Environment/Last document menu option the deleted PO line is still referenced. How can I reset the last document for a PO line once the PO line has been deleted?

    the field just says last PO, it does not say last undeleted PO.
    The next PO will update this field.

  • Info Record Flagged for deletion

    Dear Friends,
    I am not sure if should raise this question in MM or PS area as error message is related to MM and occurring into PS area.
    Issue Description In my company (building construction) we create Project/Network which would have hundreds of activities. Each network activity will have some component (materials). At component it contains info like Material number, Purchase Org, Vendor, Info record etc. Under clean up process info record is flagged for deletion because we donu2019t buy the component from that vendor any more then procurement dept flag that info record and create a new info record with the new vendor.
              If we try to update any data through either CJ20N or CN22 it gives error message u201CInfo record flagged for deletionu201D , message number is CN 766 and it doesnu2019t allow to save the project or network as this message is set with category u201CErroru201D. This is quite annoying for the business users.
    Requirement I want to know about u201CHow to make this error message informationalu201D??
    My effort to find the solution  I tried to use transaction OBA5, OBMSG through which we can change the configuration so that message will be only informational, but the issue is that I couldnu2019t find the application area CN with Message number 766.
    It would be a great help if any one of you could suggest me a possible solution for this issue.
    Regards,
    Sunny

    Purpose of deletion flag is not to control which vendor is a valid source of supply in relation to one material. It is in connection with archiving process....
    In info record (ME12 --> "Purch. Org. Data 1.") you can set "Available from" (EINA-LIFAB) and "Available to" (EINA-LIFBI) in "Supply Option" section. Message 06681 belongs to it which can be controlled in:
    SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Environment Data > Define Attributes of System Messages
    Please consider this option...(you can also use source list (ME01) but it is too strict control in my opinion)

  • Two Purchase Info Records for Same Material & Plant Combination

    Hi,
    2 Purchase Info Records are there for Same Material & Plant for 2 Different Vendors & Net Price is maintained in both Info Records
    1. Material M1 - Plant 1000 - Vendor A - Net Price Rs.4
    2. Material M1 - Plant 2000 - Vendor B - Net Price Rs.3
    Vendor A is Regular Vendor
    (Tick as Regular Vendor is his Purchase Info Record)
    It is observed that Rs.3 is picked up for Costing Purposes
    Requirement is that - Net Price within Pur. Info Record of Regular Vendor i.e Rs. 4 must be picked up always for Costing Puposes.
    Is this possible???
    What Logic system uses while picking up the Price in case where there are 2 Pur. Info Records for same Material & Plant???
    Thanks & Regards...
    Ameya...

    Hi,
    1. Material M1 - Plant 1000 - Vendor A - Net Price Rs.4
    (Validity - 28.04.2008 To 31.12.2008)
    2. Material M1 - Plant 1000 - Vendor B - Net Price Rs.3
    (Validity - 01.01.08 To 31.12.2008)
    Thanks & Regards...
    Ameya...

  • Purchase info record and Contract are not reflected in SC

    Hi...
       while i am creating a shopping cart in SRM for a particular product... i am not able to find the Purchase info record or Contract in SC - Source of supply tab...
    I maintained the Purchase info record and Contract for the particular material in Backend(4.7n).
    Plz throw some lights on this...
    thx....

    Hi
    if you are using classic scenario it might have dispalyed in SOS.
    check info records/contracts  are existed in backend for your product in srm?
    is your cart is special request(describe requirement ) or internal goods and services?
    if you are in ecs mode. it is not possible to see your inforecord/ backend contract in srm sos window
    regards
    muthu

  • Info records flagged for deletion don't update purchase orders

    Hi, I would like to know how I can customize SAP-MM in order to avoid that the info records flagged for deletion update the purchase orders.
    When I create a PO from a Purchase requisition (which have data with texts like "Vendor material number"), the Info record flagged for deletion update this data.
    Thank you

    Hello
    I think inforecords flagged for deletion is not being considered for PO updation. Could you please check again.
    It might be posible that 'Vendor material number' is spcified in Purchase requisition and when you create PO from Purchase requisition, it is copied from there to PO.
    I hope it will resolve your issue.
    Best regards
    Avinash

  • Purchasing Info Record marked for deletion

    Hi experts,
    I need some explanation on Purchasing Info Records and more precisely on the deleted ones.
    Could you tell me why a Purch. Info Record that is marked for deletion is still set when a PO is created?
    In ME13 I have the following warning message : 06-718 (Purchasing info record & & & & flagged for deletion).
    In ME21N the same message is displayed as warning and users are able to save the PO with the deleted Info Record.
    I don't understand why SAP still retrieves Info Records that are marked for deletion...
    Is there a way to prevent SAP from using deleted info records?
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards,
    Philippe

    Hi Philippe,
    The message  06718 can be set as an error or warning in customising.
    If message 06718 is set as error then system will not allow to save 
    the document with that info record.
    The deletion indicator is the reservation to delete this record. But
    this is not comparable with the deletion of the record from the database
    This has to be done within the archiving run for the object MM_EINA.
    Untill this inforecord is not archived the data is taken as usual."
    Online documentation provides the following information
    "You cannot delete obsolete info records immediately. You can
    only flag them for subsequent deletion. Info records earmarked for
    deletion in this way are not actually deleted until the archiving
    program is run. This is done at regular intervals by your system
    administrator. You can flag an individual info record for deletion,
    or create a list of deletion proposals and choose the relevant records
    that are to be deleted from this list."
    Kind regards,
    Lorraine

  • Mass Delete Purchasing Info Records

    Is there a way to flag a standard info record EINA-LOEKZ in mass maintenance MEMASSIN
    for several materials across several different vendors?
    I can select EINA-LOEKZ in MEMASSIN then choose selection fields and pull down the material and vendor.  But I dont see an option for purchasing org., or plant?

    Hi,
    Use this transaction to delete a Purchasing Information Record. An information record contains information tying a specific vendor to a material or material group.
    Menu Path
    From the SAP R/3 Screen, select the path:
    Logistics >> Materials management >> Purchasing >>
    (new menu) Master data >> Info record >> Flag for deletion
    Or use the transaction code --> ME15
    http://web.mit.edu/sapr3/windocs/bpmds09m.htm
    Regards
    Sudheer

  • Error in CIF for Purchase Info Records

    Hi,
    I am trying to CIF Purchase Info record from R/3 to APO but its getting stuck during activation "generating delta Model".
    Can anyone please help in this regards, I have already read the link related to BD22 but which message type do we need to delete. Also what can be the other reason.
    I have CIFed Plant, material, vendor in the same sequence also I have extended material to vendor manually in APO.
    I have one more issue the vendor code 1000000 in R/3 is getting create as 0001000000 in APO can this cause a problem
    Thanks,
    sanjog

    Hi Sanjog ,
    Iam not sure why you are looking at tcode BD22. It is not relevant to PIR transfer .
    Also to CIF the PIR for a material from R/3 to APO, it is not necessary that the material should exist in the vendor location in APO. (You need to create the material at vendor location only if it is required specifically for your business scenario).
    Now , to identify what is causing the problem , you have to check the inbound queue in APO and outbound queue in R/3. The tcodes are SMQ2 and SMQ1. You can also use the queue manager /n/sapapo/cq in APO . Check what the error message is and correct the master data in R/3 accordingly. Then delete all blocked queue entries (/sapapo/cq can be used ) and then run the PIR CIF activation again.
    Thanks
    Saradha

  • Delete Purchase Info Records

    Hi,
      I have done some modification in the Pricing condition type.
    When I create PO the condition type is appearing correctly
    But, if there is info records existing for this Vendor Material combination, then the condition types from Last PO are fetched.
    This should  not happen.
    It is difficult to explain to large number of usre to delete the PIR while cretion of Purchase Order OR to carry out new pricing.
    I am thinking of deleting all the Purchase Info records to resolve this issue.
    Is it the only solution..?what will be the Implications of deleting PIRs.
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    If the requirement is to prevent the picking of the condition from the last PO for the info record maintained for vendor-material combination, you can as well go to SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Environment Data --> Define Default Value for Buyers --> Settings for Default Value
    Proce Adoption tab --> Select Do not copy conditions from last PO.
    assign the default value to the paramter tab for the user in the SU02 transaction.
    Regards,
    Bijoy Kumar

  • Purchase info record BDC Condition type for gross price

    Hi,
    I have got flat file with vendor material plant porg conditon type price.
    It has to be posted to SAP purchase info record.
    The first condition type is always for gross  price.
    How can I validate whether the condition type given in the file will be for gross price and will be applicable for that vendor or material given in the file.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    Check with A017 Table
    Thanks
    Seshu

  • Purchase info record for PO determine by Storage location

    Dear Guru,
    Can you please advice when during the creation of PO, is there possible to determine the Purchase info record by the Purchasing Org, material, Vendor as well as "Storage Location".
    Reason,
    Sometime we need to raise the PO those customer who will be exempted from the governamt VAT or duty which the goods has to delivery to the country Bonded warehouse.
    I created 2 Storage location;
    1.) 1000 for general WH
    2.) 2000 for Bonded Wh
    So i would like to know if we can create 2 different info record determine by Storage Location?
    Thank you very much,
    Regards
    Chee Wee

    Hi
    In Standard SAP it is not possible

  • Purchase Info Record for Frame work Order

    Hi Friends,
    Do we have Purchase info record for Frame work Order(FO) ?. If yes, Please tell me which info category should i need to select to create a Purchase Info Record.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Is that means, Framework  PO will also use the same standard Purchase info record ?
    Thanks

  • Creating Conditions for Purchase Info Records using IDoc COND_A01

    Hi All,
    we are using IDOC COND_A01 to update and add conditions in ME12 transactions.
    But when we send a condition IDoc which contains 2 condition types (Segment KONP), the standard function call creates only one database entry in the table KONP. The entry in KONP is for  standard condition types PB00, but not  for company specific types (Say: ZABC) .But when we create them manually in ME12 maintaining an purchase info record  we get both the entries in the KONP database table.
    Has anyone come accross such a problem? Is there any special field in the IDoc COND_A01 which controls the creation of the condition types?
    Thanks for any answer!

    U should use basic type INFREC01 instead of NFRECMASS01.
    Within the FM there is a check for basic type like:
    check idoc type
        if f_idoc_control-idoctp <> c_idoctp_infrec01. " INFREC01
          raise wrong_function_called.
        endif.
    Edited by: Joyjit Ghosh on Sep 15, 2008 4:57 PM

  • BDC for Purchase info records in AFS

    Hi Everyone,
    I could not found any BAPI,IDOC,FM with supports for uploading purchase info records in AFS, is the only way is to do is recording or any thing else supports.
    Regards,
    Srinath.

    Hi Srinath,
    You have posted on a wrong forum.  Please close your thread.
    You may check this thread and post to your question there:
    *The operation cannot be carried out with this node type*
    Thanks,
    Gordon

Maybe you are looking for

  • Renaming the index.htm file

    Folks - I welcome some help on this one! I'm running RoboHelp 9, and authoring a help system for a dev group whose buildmeister has requested I rename (if possible) RoboHelp's compiled 'index.htm' file to something else, so as not to conflict with an

  • BUG: Cannot import video - dynamiclinkmediaserver has encountered an error

    I'm receiving this error in LR4.1 RC. I was also receiving it when LR4.0 was installed. It's on a mac. [/Volumes/BuildDisk/builds/DynamicLinkMediaServer1/main/shared/adobe/MediaCore/ASL/Foundat ion/Make/Mac/../../Src/DirectoryRegistry.cpp-283] How do

  • I want to change my fullname and computer's name, but I can't

    I'm not talking about the name from '.local' I'm talking about the compter's full name stored here and the username. My parents bought me this and they just went out and put their names here without my permission and before I even got to use this! My

  • Another Modification question :)

    ok, my last post was about getting DisplayName from user table and get it into the datagrid. now im trying something similar, im trying to get an extra column with the postalcode in the customers.ascx from the dashboard. i have learned a lot from my

  • Error in result of To_Char function.

    Hi, My name is Ramanujulu, I was practicing Date functions and found one error in one of the To_Char functions. Please assume the sysdate as 19th Decmber 2006. (I used this date in example) SQL> select to_char(sysdate-7, 'ddspth-month-syear') from du