Purchasing organization structure

Hi Team,
I have a question on purchasing organization management. Currently there are two scenarios:
Option 1: There is only one purchasing organization for one country and two company codes. Purchasing organization is not assigned to company code. All the plants in the countries are assigned to one Purchasing Organization. But plants are assigned to respective company code.
Option 2:  There are two purchasing organization for one country and two company codes. Each Purchasing organization is assigned to respective company code. All the plants in the countries are assigned to respective company codes and Purchasing Organization.  I mean one set of plants are assigned to one purchasing organization and company code and other set of plants are assigned to other purchasing organization and company code.
Now my question is which option is better? The purchasing team (Buyers) are located in different cities in one country but they can procure for any purchasing organization so what is the benefit of having option2.
I see advantage in option 1 as it reduces lots of master data and if needed we can control the conditions by Purchasing info record at plant level.
Please reply.
Regards,
AG

Hi
Porg is a
Organizational unit within Logistics, subdividing an enterprise according to the requirements of Purchasing. A purchasing organization procures materials and services, negotiates conditions of purchase with vendors, and bears responsibility for such transactions.
Based on the Enterprise, Company and plant size, location, logisitics geographics  the decision has to be taken at what level the Porganisation has to be defined and assigned.*
Purchasing organizations may be defined according to the following criteria
Different legal responsibilities
How procurement is organized within a specific enterprise, for example, several areas may be responsible for procurement, each enterprise may have its own purchasing policy
The need to break down purchasing activities according to specific criteria, for example:
According to enterprise areas
According to responsibility for different geographic areas (national or international level)
According to products procured
The need to record certain purchasing-specific information, such as prices, conditions, or vendor evaluation, in the R/3 System
You create purchasing-specific information for each purchasing organization, for example:
Vendor master data
Purchasing info records
Vendor evaluations
Porg may be defined based on the procurement methods
Company-code- or plant-specific purchasing
Central purchasing
Central contract management
The purchasing organization is then active for all company codes and is not assigned directly to one company code. In this case, you assign the purchasing organization to the company code when procurement processes are being carried out.
(Courtsey SAP)
Hope this will give an idea
Cheers
Kris
Edited by: KRISHNA AKULA on Jan 14, 2011 10:31 AM

Similar Messages

  • SRM Purchasing Organization Structure

    Hi Gurus,
    I'm working on SRM 5.0 with the following scenarios:
    - Plan driven for transfering PR from ECC and R/3 systems into SRM
    - Contract management (one purchasing department) for distributing GOA contract into ERP systems
    My client has one central purchasing department that create PO and Contract for more company managed on different 4 ERP system. So I have more 4 Purchasing organization on BE systems.
    How can I model this enviroment on SRM?
    Have I to create a Local Purchasing Organization on SRM?
    When I create a Contract with Local Purchasing Gruop, how can I map it to a back end Purchasing Gruop?
    Thank you in advance.
    Marco

    Hi
    <b>Try using BADIs</b>
    BBP_PGRP_ASSIGN_BADI    
    BBP_PGRP_FIND           
    BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Purchase info record does not exists in purchase organization 1000

    Hi experts,
              I have created a new enterprise structure in SAP. when i am creating a PO its picking the correct info record, but when i am doing GR, its giving the error as 'purchase info record does not exists in purchase organization 1000". I have maintained everything perfect. the only thing i have changed is I have moved the open and close period from 11-2002 to 12-2008 in MMPV.
             Please give me some suggestions, where it can go wrong.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Poorna.

    Hi Guys,
              Thanks for all yours responses, Actually what deepak said was right, but in my IDES system i am not able to create new entries in assign plant to std purchase org. I found the database view for that, V_001W_E its for table T001W. So i looked into that table i found that std purchase org was given as 1000. i made direct entries in that table, i thought the reason for this may be due to , that i copied plant from 1000. After making entries , i did not got the error message that was i am previously getting.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ravi.

  • FI organizational structure in ECC 6.0

    Dear all,
    I would like to know what is the suggested organizational structure in FI in ECC 6.0. For example, whether it supports multiple company code or single company code. If a company code is situated out of India, how the taxation and all will be consolidated etc. etc.
    Kindly can any one provide me documents on the above subject related to Finance Module.
    It will be very helpful If anyone sends the required documents
    Email id : [email protected]
    Thanking you in advance
    Vijaya

    Hi Vijayalaxmi,
    SAP 6.0 ECC is supports what data you doing in previous versions like 4.7 or 5.0 etc
    you can set company in india or out of india and  taxation also same what you doing in previous versions
    differece is ECC 6.0 is some extra functions is added on advance purpose
    Organizational Units and Basic Settings
    Definition
    Elements of the SAP System logical structure, important for Financial Accounting.
    Organizational units are used to structure business functions and for reporting. The organizational units of Financial Accounting are used for external reporting purposes, that is, they fulfil requirements that your business is subject to from external parties, for example, legal regulations. The financial statements for example, are created based on the organizational units of Financial Accounting.
    Basic settings in Financial Accounting are Customizing settings that you have to make in order to be able to carry out processes in Financial Accounting.
    Use
    You create your company-specific organizational structure in the SAP System by defining the organizational units and making the basic settings. Defining organizational units for Financial Accounting is obligatory, that is, you have to define these units in order to be able to implement the Financial Accounting component.
    Organizational unit
    Definition
    Client
    Obligatory
    Company
    Optional
    Company code
    Obligatory
    Business area
    Optional
    Basic setting
    Chart of accounts
    Obligatory
    Fiscal year
    Obligatory
    Currencies
    Obligatory
    Integration
    In the SAP System, you define the relevant organizational units for each component that you are implementing. For example, for Sales and Distribution, you define sales organizations, distribution channels, and divisions (product groups). Similarly, for Purchasing, you define purchasing organizations, evaluation levels, plants, and storage locations. The organizational units are independent of one another at this stage.
    Components and Organizational Units
    Component
    Organizational unit
    Sales and Distribution
    Sales organization, ...
    Logistics
    Purchasing organization, ...
    Financial Accounting
    Company code, ...
    Controlling
    Controlling area, ...
    Human Resources
    Employee groups, ...
    To transfer data between the individual components, you have to assign the organizational units to each other. You only need to make these assignments once in the system. Whenever you enter data subsequently, it is automatically transferred.
    For example, invoices that are posted in SD are transferred to FI.
    Below link will give total structure of organisational structure
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/e5/0779ee4acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Hope this infirmation will helps you
    Prem

  • Local Purchasing Organization in extended classic scenario SRM 4.0

    Hi all,
    I have tried to make settings for updating vendor master records. I used the following path in IMG.
    SAP Implementation Guide > SRM Server > Technical Basic Settings > Settings for Vendor Synchronisation > Define Settings for Each Backend System
    There i wanted to make the entries for: Order, LogSystem, Flag in NoBEPchOrg and Local Purchasing Org. For the Local Purchasing Org. field i could not select any entries.
    My question now is how can I check if there is any local purchasing organization maintained. In the EBP Organizational Structure I have set the flag for the purchasing organization and have entered in the "corresponds to" the number of my purchasing organization from the backend and i have selected the SRM-System in the next field.
    Best regards,
    Bernd

    In the organization structure, under function tab leave the corresponds to field blank

  • Organization structure in extended classic scenario

    Hi All
    I  am trying to configure extended classic scenario on SAP SRM 7.0.  I have made the following settings for the same:
    1. In SPRO->SRM Server-> Technical Basic Settings -> Define backend system from product category, I have specified target system as SRM system and not ECD system
    2. In SPRO->SRM Server->Cross Application Basic Settings-> Activate Extended Classic Scenario, I have selected all the options including "Back end purchasing group responsible"
    I have a few doubts.
    1. In organization Structure (PPOMA_BBP) Comapny code is corresponding to company code in back end but do I have to create local purchasing organization and local purchasing group i.e. in Functions-> Corresponds  I'll have to leave blank. plz suggest
    2. Also is IPC configuration mandatory for extended classic scenario
    Plz give your suggestion on above mentioned issue
    Regards
    Pawan Keshwani
    Edited by: pawankeshwani on Mar 18, 2011 8:33 AM

    Hi Pawan,
    No you should mention Purch Org & Purch Grp also wrt your backend (ECC).
    IPC need not be configured separately from SRM 5.0 onwards. To ascertain if IPC is working fine just run the report : RSVMCRT_HEALTH_CHECK. You should see 4 success messages. Else get in touch with Basis to enable Virtual Machine Container (VMC)
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Purchase Info Record not found in Purchasing Organization 1000

    Hi all,
    While doing MIGO, Goods issue to cost center from consignment stock (201 k )
    i'm getting this error.
    "Purchase Info Record not found in Purchasing Organization 1000"
    i'm practising with standard company 1000.
    i have checked the all assignments.
    i.e., purch. org ->company code and
          purch. org-> plant.
          company code -> plant.
    Please guide me.
    regards,
    anand.

    Hi,
    Go and maintain Pur. Org 1000 against ur plant in :
    SPRO-Enterprise Structure-Assignments--MM-Assign Std Pur. Org for plant
    and please confirm that you have maintained the inforecord in Pur Org 1000 only and that too of Consignment type.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Dheeraj

  • Organization structure for Case study .... need yr advice

    Hi …I am in process of preparing an org structure for one of the company.
    The company operations is like ….
    The company has four factories in different locations and have 3 Regional distribution centers (RDC) across india. Each distribution center has 5 branches (Sales Offices), in this way they 15 Sales offices across India.
    Most of the materials are procured by factories independently while some materials are centrally procured. Factories produce Finish goods and they are either sale to customer directly ( big regular customers) , or transferred to RDC to cater the requirements of other MID size customers and the other possibility to transfer it to Branches for Retail customers. RDCs also transfer FG to Branches.
    All factories , RDC and branches have warehouse facility , however branches have limited warehouse facility as the customers supported by them are very few and generally deliveries are made directly from RDC / Factory.
    They also have one R&D department in another location to develop new products and material is generally transferred from factories to R&D department.They also have one project division at the same (R&D) location which handles commissioning of new plants and procurement of capital goods.
    Raw Material , Semi finish and FG are transferred between factories and FG material is also transferred between RDCs.
    The group also has another Company which produces another line of products. RDCs and Branches of first company also work for second company (which means same RDC can store FG produced by both companies) and also Branches can also have FG material of both companies. Second company doesn’t have any specific R&D or capital division and R&D and capital of first company also work for second company.
    Inter company transfer between both companies is a regular practice.
    > Proposed Org structure
    Company – Group Company
    Company Code – First company and Second company
    Factory Configurations
    For first company
    4 Factories will be 4 plants
    Factories Structure (Storage locations / warehouses and storage type)
    Since factories have different type of material ( like FG , Raw material , WIP ) therefore I am confused what option I should select 
    1) 3 storage location ( for each plant) and one warehouse, 1 storage type
    2) 1 storage  location and three warehouses (I think this is not possible in SAP , not sure ?? )
    3) 1 storage location , 1 warehouse and 3 storage types
    RDC structure
    RDCs have full fledged warehouse facility and therefore thinking of making them also as Plant. Every RDC will have 6 Storage locations , 1 for First company RDC itself, 5 for associated branches and I feel each “RDC storage locations” should be a associated to a separate warehouse also.
    ( Since both companies produce different set of products therefore they will have different material and hence thinking of handling products of both companies in same plant and same storage location and warehouse , may be two storage type/area can be defined to differentiate material of both companies.)
    Branches: Will be storage locations under RDC …..
    While making branches as Storage location …. I have another question about valuation , since material from Plant and RDC is being transferred to Branches and  from there it is distributed to customers therefore the valuation of FG at BRANCH and RDC should be different as transportation cost , packing , unpacking etc cost should get added at Branch level.
    Therefore in case I make branch as Storage location , I will miss the valuation part while if I make them as Plant then there will be lot of documents get generated for each movement. Hence not sure for what option I should go.
    R&D:
    Since R& D department is involved in testing in New Product development and generally material is required to be scrapped after testing therefore thinking of making it as Plant with one storage location and may be here I don’t need any warehouse (WM) here.
    Project Division
    Project division may also be a separate plant with one storage location and NO WAREHOUSE is required to linked with it.
    Purchase Organizations
    4 purchase organizations for each plant respectively and 1 centralized purchase Org for central procurement.
    Your all valuable inputs are welcome .... looking foward to have a best possible configuration for above mentioned case study.
    Regards

    Phew... long long question
    The rule I generally follow is that the org structure should map reality.
    Company code - where Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss are prepared at the end of the year. If an entity does not do this, it is not a company code.
    Plant
    1) Each manufacturing facility is a plant (could be in 1 location or separate).
    2) Each separate location is a plant (even if it only stores goods). May be an overkill, but helps when legal requirements change or the location is upgraded.
    So in your case, RDC will be a plant (may be more than 1 if necessary). R&D should be a separate plant without warehouse management
    Storage location
    The only rule I follow is that there should not be any overlap of storage locations. So physically, any area of say 1 square foot should belong to one and only one storage location. Otherwise there is a lot of confusion during physical inventory. So logical locations are a no-no.
    I usually use a lot of storage locations.
    Don't have a warehouse spanning multiple plants (even though it is allowed).
    Purchasing organizations
    Have one for each location of purchase. If there is a team sitting in each plant procuring for only that plant, have it as a separate purchasing org (not strictly necessary, but makes authorization simple). For central purchasing, a central purchasing org should do nicely...
    Hope this helps,
    Lakshman

  • Organizational structure

    Hi,
       I need to know the organizational structure flow diagram for purchasing related to FI module such as the diagram which shows the relationship b/w storage location,company codes n plants.

    Hi ,
    You can go through SPRO settings
    also see the link http://www.sap-topjobs.com/SpecialPP/SAPMM.pdf
    where you can find the useful documentation,
    hope this helps
    Thanks,
    Prashant

  • Contract from centralized purchase organization without company code

    Hi Experts.
    We have six company codes
    And having one centralized purchase organization and it is not assigned to any company codes
    While creating contracts all company code uses this centralized purchase organization.
    My question is :-
    I want to create contract with above centralized purchase organization without company codes in it so while converting above contract to po we can use any one company code in the po.
    How to create contract with centralized purchase organization without company code? (Later this contract can be used to convert po from any the company codes )
    Please helpu2026
    Thanks in Advance
    Prashanth.Venkategowda

    Hi,
    What you need to do is:
    In SPRO->Org.Structure->Definition->Materials Management->Maintain
    Purch. Org. you need to "declare" all your Purch. Orgs.
    In "SPRO->Org.Structure->Assignment->Materials Management->Assing
    Purch. Org. to company code" you must NOT assign your corporal Purch.
    Org to any company.
    In the Plant assignment screen assign your corporal Purch. Org to all
    the relevant Plants.
    In this kind of hierarchy you make all the purchasing activities
    (contracts, PO's etc.) for this purch org.
    Thats all.
    In the case that you have 2 level hierarchy: one corporal and many
    company\plant assigned purch. orgs you need to do additional step.
    After assigning a "small" purch. orgs to the plants and companies you
    can assign them to "reference" Purch Org. (that not assigned itself to
    any plant/company) in the ""SPRO->Org.Structure->Assignment->Materials
    Management->Assing Purch. Org. to reference Purch. Org."
    That kind of hierarchy allows you to make a contracts at the "reference"
    org. level and use them in PO's by the lowest purch. orgs.
    Hope that it will help.
    Regards,
    Udaya.

  • Defaulting Purchasing Organization in Purchase Order.

    Hi,
    I had maintained a Purchasing organization for a Plant in the following node
    SPRO > Enterprise Structure > Assignment > Assign std Purchase Orgn to Plant
    But when i am processing  Stock Transport  purchase order it does not defaults the purchase organization which i had defaulted in the SPRO,
    How to proceed.
    Regards,
    R. Dillibabu.

    The default of the Pur org in PO can be achieved in the following ways....
    1) You can set the default values in the user settings in ME21n screen .
    2) If the Purchase org is only one for the user, you can maintain the value for the parameter EKO in the user settings in SU01.
    Please reward points fro useful answers
    Regards
    Mani

  • Plant and purchasing organization

    Hi all,
    I have two questions. Hope anybody can help me out.
    1. Do we assign a plant to a purchasing organization or assign a purchasing organization to a plant?
    2. Can I assign a plant to multiple purchasing organizations?
    thx

    Hi,
    1) go to IMG>Enterprise structure>Definition> logistics general> define plant
    Define Purchase organisation in MM
    IMG> Enterprise structure>Assignment> Materials Management> assign Purchase organisation to plant OX17
    2)Assign purchasing organization to plant
    In this IMG activity, you assign purchasing organizations to the plants for which they are responsible.
    You have the following options:
    One purchasing organization procures for one plant.
    This is plant-specific purchasing.
    One purchasing organization procures for several plants.
    Several purchasing organizations procure for one plant.
    Depending on the form you have chosen, assign your purchasing organization(s) to the respective plant(s).
    Rewards welcome
    Thanks & Regards
    Swathi

  • Purchasing group transacting for multiple purchasing organizations

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in which i have certain purchasers defined as purchasing groups in my organizational structure. However, these purchasing groups perform sourcing transactions (e.g., bid invitation, auction) for multiple purchasing organizations. In the organizational structure, these purchasing groups are created under an organizational unit that isn't defined as a purchasing organization. They appear "free-floating" since they are not assigned to a particular purchasing organization.
    In sourcing transactions (e.g., bid invitation, auction), the list of purchasing groups from which I can choose from depends on the purchasing organization I select. Is there a way to include the "free floating" purchasing groups in the drop-down list?
    Thanks and regards,
    Joy

    Hi Joy,
    Its difficult to have a P.Grp with out a P.Org assignment.
    My idea would be:
    Assign this P.Grp to one of the P.Orgs (lets say POrg1). Add the entire root as the responsibility of this P.Grp.
    When the Purchasers in this P.Grp create a Bid Invitation, the POrg1 will be defaulted always.
    At the time of saving the Bid Invitation, use the "BBP_PGRP_ASSIGN_BADI" BADI to overwrite POrg1 value with any other POrg you desire.
    You may test it out.
    Cheers,
    Akash

  • Changing organizational structure in SRM

    Hi All,
    We are in production with SRM 4.0 since 1.1.2006 and using R/3 since 2003.
    Our company intends to change the organizational structure (delete, merge, move
    organizational structure).
    We are going to copy our PROD systems (both R/3 and SRM) to other systems to be able to apply and check the changes.
    Problems:
    1.     How is it possible to replace “LogsysXXX” to that of the new backend for each attribute in the organizational structure, for every organizational unit? The attributes are not inherited data because they differ from one another, and there are many of them within the org structure (for example the attributes “plant”, “purchasing org and group” have the “LogsysXXX” defined as part of the parameter. There are about 600 users with 50 attributes each in all the org structure; therefore a manual process would not be acceptable. 
    Note: We didn’t copy the HR organization to the SRM org structure.
    2.     Documents which are being processed and at the time of “copy client” and were already created in SRM (PO, POR, SC), point to the old backend (“LogsysXXX”). 
    How do we change this pointer in existing documents to the new backend system? 
    Best regards,
    Rami

    Hi Rami,
    Please check former post :
    Re: Logical  system name to be updated while client copy--URGENT HELP REQUIRED
    Re: Exact copy of SRM PRD to DEV ? :-(
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Purchasing Organization to Company code relationship question

    My client is running EEC 6.0 in production.  When the original configuration was done, the purchasing organization was incorrectly assigned to the company code (table V_T024E_Assign; menu path: IMG > Enterprise Structure > Assignment > Materials Management > Assign Purchasing Organization to company code).  This should have been left blank since we wanted the purchasing organization to serve multiple company codes.  I know that I can blank out the company code and assign each plant ( e.g.  plants for company code 1 and plants for company code 2) to the purchasing organization.
    The question that I have is:  What impact would this change have on any of the existing purchasing related transactions currently in the system (e.g. purchase orders, invoices, receipts, issues)?  Would it cause any problems?
    Any assistance is answer this would be appreciated.  If you need more information, please let me know.
    Greg Brown
    FI/CO consultant

    (1) You can assign a purchasing organization to one company code. This is company-specific purchasing.
    (2) You can assign a purchasing organization to no company code but to plants.
    This purchasing organization can then procure for all plants assigned to it, irrespective of the company code to which the plant belongs.
    Since each plant must be assigned to a company code, the company code can be determined via the plant in each procurement transaction, even if the procuring purchasing organization is not assigned to a company code.
    A purchasing organization must be assigned to one or more plants. This is plant-specific purchasing.
    When you will delete the realtion of P.Org and Company code. It will shift to the second situation where P.Org is assigned to Plant and since Plants are assigned to company code so it will refer to the respective company code.
    Thanks,
    Birender Agnihotri

Maybe you are looking for