QM action not allowed for DTP requests in master data and Text tables

Hi,
I have a master data object load request which has failed, returned error in st22 and job finished.
BUT the request has not turned red in the monitor - it's still yellow. That means that I can not delete request nor start new load to infoprovider because it believes a request is still running. But it's not, I've checked both sm37, sm50 etc.
When trying to manually change QM status to 'red' it says 'QM action not allowed for DTP requests in master data and Text tables'
How can I force QM status to red so that I can move on?
Running NW2004s BI (7.0) Patch 15.
I searched for this question but there is no answer
Thank you

Folks
I know how frustrating this problem is even in netweaver 7.0 environment. I found a solution for this problem atlast and it works but a not direct way of resolving this issue.
When this request is in yellow status and not able to change / delete the request, its actually in a pseudo status and it is a bug in the program. This request sits in table RSBKREQUEST with processing type as 5 in data elements USTATE, TSTATE and this 5 is actually "Active" status which is obviously wrong.
All we need is, ask your basis person to change the status to 3 in both these data elements and then it allows to reload the delta. Once the delta is successfully loaded, you can delete the previous bad request even though it is still in yellow. Once the request is deleted, the request status gets updated as "4" in table RSBKREQUEST.
Hope this helps.
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Customizing tables not asking for Customizing Request while saving data

    Hi,
    I have some customizing tables in my development server (Delivery Class = 'C').
    These always used to ask for a Customizing Request whenever data was saved in them.
    Suddenly, I have noticed they are no more asking for any Customizing Request. I cross-checked in the Transport Organizer and confirmed that there are no customizing requests of mine which may be already holding any data entries of these tables.
    I wonder why this may be happening (believe it to be some basis configuration issue. also asked my basis guy but he has no clue).
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks,
    Z

    Thanks Navneet and Gautham.
    My problem is now solved. Let me summarize the problem and the solution now.
    -> The customization tables suddenly stopped asking for a request while saving data.
        Somehow the settings had been reset, and as Gautham pointed out, it was corrected in the tcode SCC4
    -> Most of the tables now worked fine, but still few of them didnt ask for requests
        Here, I found out that the developers had chosen "no, or user, recording routine" instead of  "standard recording routine". For such tables, when i check in the tcode SE54, menu path Environment -> Maintenance Objects -> Change, I find the Transport category 'No Transport'. Regenerating the maintenance generator choosing "standard recording routine" fixes this and the tables now ask for a customizing request.
    Thanks, both, for the quick response.

  • SAP MM Rounding Profile not allowed for plant in sales org data 1-Quantity stipulation

    Hi
         I have created rounding profile in OWD1 for a particular plant  and it is showing IN material master MRP DATA1 area. But when i am trying to assign in sales :sales org1 data under quantity stipulation area there is no profile  . Is there any specific plant assignment for sales area data?
    Kindly guide me.
    Ganesh

    Hi,
       The material master sales data 1 is not plant specific generally. You may create a rounding profile in OWD1 without plant and then the same will be visible in the F4 list in sales data 1. If the rounding profile is plant specific,  you have to maintain the delivering plant in material master - sales data 1.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • "Export to Excel" does not work for query based on Master Data InfoSet

    We have many queries based on InfoSet consisting 2 or more PS Master Data. After we upgraded from BW 3.1 to 3.5, the "Export To Excel" function no longer works via BEx Browser. It returns all blanks where master data should be shown. Only the non-data area like column headings are exported to excel.
    Is this a bug introduced in BW 3.5?
    Thanks,
    Kinuko

    It seems that BW 3.5 SP10 may fix this problem.

  • System shud not allow for batch change after  bacth determiantion.

    Dear ALL,
       I have one Isuue at my client , there requiremtn is -
    "Performing the process it was detected that the raw material and packaging material  batches could be changed after the process order created, which allows to picking a batch instead FEFO. "
    Is there any way that system not allow for any change related to batch and its qunitity.
    Awaiting for fevorable respoce.
    Regards,
    Prerna Verma

    Hi Prerena,
    Activating Check Batch Tab in COR4 will performs an additional check in order itself.This check works after completing Batch Determination.For example during Batch Determination system has selected (as per your sort rule) Batch X for issue.But later User tries to change this Batch No. to Batch Y(by overwriting the batch no. in Batch field).But if you have activated this Check Batch function then system will perform the check immediately whether this new Batch complies the Batch Determination rule or not.And if found wrong then gives you an error or warning msg(depends oin your msg control).
    my second point is regarding Transaction code COB1 to deactivate the Allow change function.See if you activate the this tab then you finds that qty fields editable during Batch determination.So you can change the qty. manually during batch detemination.
    So in your case 2 level checks required.
    1) During Batch Determination (COB1) - Deactivate Allow change
    2) After Batch Determination(COR4) - Activate Check Batch
    Regards,
    Dhaval
    Edited by: Dhaval on Sep 27, 2010 8:43 PM

  • Error in DTP load from PSA to IC - Error - Key figure 0 not allowed for

    HI ALL,
    ERROR - Key figure <> 0 not allowed for unit ' '; see long text
    Diagnosis
        The unit/currency ' Source unit MEIN ' with the value 'space' is
        assigned to the key figure ' Source Key Fig. DIFF ' with the value '
        4240.000- '.
    System Response
        A key figure that is not equal to 0 and for which no unit/currency is
        set has an inconsistent data state. The data record is not processed.
    Procedure
        Correct the source data.
    Procedure for System Administration
    Please guide
    BR
    Prasad

    Hi ,
    First af all identify all such records by creating an error DTP so that the same can be collected in Error stack .
    1. Go to the Update tab of the normal DTP and there you can find the create Error DTP option .Click on that .
    2. This will take you to the Error DTP screen .Use the option 'Valid record updated reporting possible (request green).You can increase the number of errorneous records to be avoided there only .
    3. Please make sure you have activated the option of ' Valid records update reporting possible request green ' both in the Normal and Error DTP .Also the number of errorneous records to be avoided to be mentioned in both the DTP's.
    4. Activate the DTP's (Both Normal and Error) .
    After this can you please run the Normal DTP again .You can check the Error stack to see the errorneous records .When you double click on any record in the error stack it will thrown an error message from where you can find the exact error with those records .You can rectify these records in the errror stack and then run the error DTP to update the same to the data target.
    Ideally these records should be rectified in the Source system .
    Thanks
    Kamal

  • Capital inv. program position not allowed for measure

    Hi Gurus,
    When I am going to assign top level wbs to investment program position i am getting the error message
    How I can overcome this.
    Quick response will be rewarded and appreciated.
    Cap. investment program position not allowed for measure
    Message no. AP039
    Diagnosis
    You want to assign a measure or appropriation request to an investment program position.  However, the program position does not allow this type of assignment.
    System Response
    The assignment is not allowed.
    Procedure
    Use the detail display in the position to find out what assignments are allowed to it.
    rgds

    HI Sree
    In  im12 I have one general Tab and one Organisational tab.Here I am not getting allowed measures button.
    even though I am unable to create AR when i am assigning WBSE there then I am getting the error message.
    Program type not allowed according to budget profile of measure
    Message no. AP177
    Diagnosis
    You tried to assign a measure to an appropriation request.
    The appropriation request type for the appropriation request specifies that assignment from measures is only possible, if the measures specify that they have to be assigned later to an investment program with program type ZM01.
    However, the budget profile of the measure specifies that it has to be assigned later to an investment program with program type ZC01.
    System Response
    The function cannot be carried out.
    Regards

  • Value 'defaultNs:AddBP2Type' is not allowed for attribute 'type'

    Hi All,
    I created the wsdl for mobile and I tried to send a SOAP request from Altova XMLSpy. However when I geive the wsdl in 'wsdl file location' I receive the following.
    File http://127.0.0.1:8080/B1iXcellerator/exec/dummy/com.sap.b1i.vplatform.scenarios.setup/vPac.sap.B1Mobile/001sap0003_sap.B1Mobile.wsdl is not valid.
    Invalid XML schema: 'Value 'defaultNs:AddBP2Type' is not allowed for attribute 'type'.'
      Error location: wsdl:definitions / wsdl:types / xs:schema / xs:element / @type
    Any Idea?
    Vangelis

    Hi,
      it seems that Altove did not cope with defaultNs prefix that is used for marking default namespace.
       just look up in your <xs:schema > tag what namespace prefix is used for your namespace - you shall find there something like this
    <xs:schema xmlns:ns0="your.namespace.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"
    and replace prefix defaultNs with prefix of your namespace (in example above it would be ns0)
    There might be several usages of defalutNs iside of WSDL (at least in my case were two) so replace it everywhere using same approach
    Best regards, Artem

  • I try to update my iPod. " not eligible for the requested build"

    I try to update my ipod touch and it says that it isnt eligible for the requested build

    This device is not eligible for the requested build: Also sometimes displayed as an "error 3194." If you receive this alert, update to the latest version of iTunes. Third-party security software or router security settings can also cause this issue. To resolve this, follow Troubleshooting security software issues.
    Downgrading to a previous version of iOS is not supported. If you have installed software to performunauthorized modifications to your iOS device, that software may have redirected connections to the update server (gs.apple.com) within the Hosts file. First you must uninstall the unauthorized modification software from the computer, then edit out the "gs.apple.com" redirect from the hosts file, and then restart the computer for the host file changes to take affect.  For steps to edit the Hosts file and allow iTunes to communicate with the update server, see iTunes: Troubleshooting iTunes Store on your computer, iPhone, iPad, or iPod—follow steps under the heading Blocked by configuration (Mac OS X / Windows) > Rebuild network information > The hosts file may also be blocking the iTunes Store. If you do not uninstall the unauthorized modification software prior to editing the hosts file, that software may automatically modify the hosts file again on restart. Also, using an older or modified .ipsw file can cause this issue. Try moving the current .ipsw file, or try restoring in a new user to ensure that iTunes downloads a new .ipsw.
    Above from:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3694

  • ITunes keeps saying iPhone not eligible for the requested build

    iTunes keeps saying iPhone not eligible for the requested build after downloading the update directly through itunes with the lateset version of itunes.

    Here are some suggestions for your error message, copied from
    iTunes: Specific update-and-restore error messages and advanced troubleshooting
    This device is not eligible for the requested build: Also sometimes displayed as an "error 3194." If you receive this alert, update to the latest version of iTunes. Third-party security software or router security settings can also cause this issue. To resolve this, follow Troubleshooting security software issues.
    Downgrading to a previous version of iOS is not supported. If you have installed software to performunauthorized modifications to your iOS device, that software may have redirected connections to the update server (gs.apple.com) within the Hosts file. First you must uninstall the unauthorized modification software from the computer, then edit out the "gs.apple.com" redirect from the hosts file, and then restart the computer for the host file changes to take affect.  For steps to edit the Hosts file and allow iTunes to communicate with the update server, see iTunes: Troubleshooting iTunes Store on your computer, iPhone, iPad, or iPod—follow steps under the heading Blocked by configuration (Mac OS X / Windows) > Rebuild network information > The hosts file may also be blocking the iTunes Store. If you do not uninstall the unauthorized modification software prior to editing the hosts file, that software may automatically modify the hosts file again on restart. Also, using an older or modified .ipsw file can cause this issue. Try moving the current .ipsw file, or try restoring in a new user to ensure that iTunes downloads a new .ipsw.

  • HT201210 "not eligible for the requested build"

    I'm trying to unlock my iPhone 4S but everytime I try I get the message above... I've updated everything and tried out some of the recommendations of the troubleshooting site but nothing seems to work.

    This device is not eligible for the requested build (Also sometimes displayed as an "error 3194")
    Update to the latest version of iTunes. Mac OS X 10.5.8 (Leopard) users may need to download iTunes 10.6.3.
    Third-party security software or router security settings can also cause this issue. To resolve this, followTroubleshooting security software issues.
    Downgrading to a previous version of iOS is not supported. If you have installed software to performunauthorized modifications to your iOS device, that software may have redirected connections to the update server (gs.apple.com) within the Hosts file. Uninstall the unauthorized modification software from the computer.
    Edit out the "gs.apple.com" redirect from your hosts file, and then restart the computer for the host file changes to take affect. For steps to edit the Hosts file and allow iTunes to communicate with the update server, see iTunes: Troubleshooting iTunes Store on your computer, iPhone, iPad, or iPod—follow steps under the heading Blocked by configuration (Mac OS X / Windows) > Rebuild network information > The hosts file may also be blocking the iTunes Store. If you do not uninstall the unauthorized modification software prior to editing the hosts file, that software may automatically modify the hosts file again on restart.
    Avoid using an older or modified .ipsw file. Try moving the current .ipsw file (see Advanced Steps > Rename, move, or delete the iOS software file (.ipsw) below for file locations), or try restoring in a new user to ensure that iTunes downloads a new .ipsw.
    Note yo can only update or restore an iPod to the current iOS. For the 4G you can only go to 6.0.1

  • Rules are not allowed for jobs with set 'archive edited messages only' flag.

    Hi,
    We are on AEX 7.4 and have enabled user defined search and also setup archiving. Even though the retention period has expired but still the messages are not being
    archived.
    We see following issues:
    1. Unable to setup archiving rule in Runtime Work Bench, we are getting following error:
    Rules are not allowed for jobs with set 'archive edited messages only flag.
    2. Unable to set the expiration of messages using the following link.Each time we specify the number days it shows the same number of
    messages expired.
    http://XXXXX:50000/MessagingSystem/job/reorgdb.jsp
    3. However if we click on "remove messages" button the messages are getting deleted which tells me that the messages are not matching any
    archiving rule hence are being removed.
    Any pointers to the above issue are appreciated!!!
    Thanks,
    Rajeev

    Hi,
    Please check the [link|http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/Archiving/Index.htm]
    Also check this
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/402fae48-0601-0010-3088-85c46a236f50?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=147266890
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Reg : "Error multiple Receivers are not allowed for Synchronous calls"

    Hi All,
    Can somebody tell me why I am getting this error "Error multiple Receivers are not allowed for Synchronous calls" when I am using Synchronous Soap Request to WebService and the response from webservice is being sent to multiple receivers which are Business services based on Receiver determination condition(Services W/o Party).

    Hi , If you are simply looking up data (and not updating tables ) using RFC you can use RFC Lookup APIs to create a java mapping
    The source message has to be a RFC request message interface and target should be RFC response message interface.
    Also you can use three step mappings in a single interface mapping.
    1. from your request message to RFC request message mapping
    2. java mapping which will do the lookup and give you rfc response back
    3.rfc response to your target response mapping.
    PS: RFC lookup can be used if there are not may hierarchy in the RFC Response structure. (i.e. may be 3 or 4 level nesting permitted)
    To help you further
    The following is a link which gives you access to a ready made source code. you just need to compile it and create a jar and import the mapping in imported archive
    http://knowhowsapxi.synthasite.com/rfc-loolup.php
    Edited by: Progirl Progirl on Oct 31, 2008 1:33 PM

  • "Access not allowed for subject: principals=[]" Common Issue with no Repose

    Hi all,
    When upgrading from 8.1 to 8.1 SP4 (we have seen the issue as early as SP2), there is an exception thrown when trying to start the server where our application is deployed:
    <pre>weblogic.management.NoAccessRuntimeException: Access not allowed for subject: principals=[], on ResourceType: Application Action: write, Target: Deployed
    </pre>
    Our application creates an InitialContext using properties from a standard properties file, and when the "java.naming.security.principal" and "java.naming.security.credentials" properties are omitted, the server will start and deploy the application, but it naturally will not work.
    I have noticed that this issue has been brought up by several others:
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/search.jspa?q=%22Access+not+allowed+for+subject%3A+principals%3D%5B%5D%22&objID=&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/thread.jspa?forumID=2058&threadID=200027601&messageID=200619947#200619947
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/thread.jspa?forumID=2051&threadID=200021662&messageID=200590642#200590642
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/message.jspa?messageID=200590569&tstart=0
    But have seen nothing resembling even a hint of a cause.
    Any suggestions that even get me going in the right direction would be appreciated.
    <pre>
    weblogic.management.NoAccessRuntimeException: Access not allowed for subject: principals=[], on ResourceType: Application Action: write, Target: Deployed
         at weblogic.management.internal.SecurityHelper$IsAccessAllowedPrivilegeAction.wlsRun(SecurityHelper.java:623)
         at weblogic.management.internal.SecurityHelper$IsAccessAllowedPrivilegeAction.run(SecurityHelper.java:510)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
         at weblogic.management.internal.SecurityHelper.isAccessAllowed(SecurityHelper.java:398)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.private_setAttribute(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:430)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.setAttribute(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:387)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.setAttribute(MBeanProxy.java:741)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invokeForCachingStub(MBeanProxy.java:475)
         at weblogic.management.configuration.ApplicationMBean_Stub.setDeployed(ApplicationMBean_Stub.java:408)
         at weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.setState(ApplicationManager.java:593)
         at weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.startConfigManager(ApplicationManager.java:740)
         at weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.start(ApplicationManager.java:501)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
         at weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invokeLocally(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:754)
         at weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invoke(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:733)
         at weblogic.management.internal.ConfigurationMBeanImpl.invoke(ConfigurationMBeanImpl.java:509)
         at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1560)
         at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1528)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.private_invoke(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:988)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.invoke(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:946)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:954)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invokeForCachingStub(MBeanProxy.java:481)
         at weblogic.management.configuration.ApplicationManagerMBean_Stub.start(ApplicationManagerMBean_Stub.java:677)
         at weblogic.management.Admin.startApplicationManager(Admin.java:2821)
         at weblogic.management.AdminServerAdmin.startApplicationManager(AdminServerAdmin.java:624)
         at weblogic.management.Admin.finish(Admin.java:2299)
         at weblogic.management.AdminServerAdmin.finish(AdminServerAdmin.java:458)
         at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.resume(T3Srvr.java:971)
         at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:361)
         at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:32)
    </pre>

    For others who have received this error, I'll post what I think has turned out to be the cause.
    Refer to
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jndi/jndi.html#471919
    Which says:
    =====
    When you create a JNDI Context with a username and password, you associate a user with a thread. When the Context is created, the user is pushed onto the context stack associated with the thread. Before starting a new Context on the thread, you must close the first Context so that the first user is no longer associated with the thread. Otherwise, users are pushed down in the stack each time a new context created. This is not an efficient use of resources and may result in the incorrect user being returned by ctx.lookup() calls.
    =====
    Our application caches the Context created, and that Context is used by other objects to perform lookups. Prior to Sp2, this caused no issues when including the username and password as part of the properties passed to the InitialContext constructor.
    I presume that closing the Context after it has been used would be the proper fix for this, but right now this Context is used in too many places once it is created. I was able to combat the issue by removing the username and password properties (java.naming.security.principal & java.naming.security.credentials) from the properties file. It seems to work as expected.

  • HT201210 my computer said that my device was not eligible for the request build. what do i do?

    i forgot my passcode so i need to restore my ipod touch

    Maybe here too:
    This device is not eligible for the requested build (Also sometimes displayed as an "error 3194")
    Update to the latest version of iTunes.
    Third-party security software or router security settings can also cause this issue. To resolve this, followTroubleshooting security software issues.
    Downgrading to a previous version of iOS is not supported. If you have installed software to performunauthorized modifications to your iOS device, that software may have redirected connections to the update server (gs.apple.com) within the Hosts file. Uninstall the unauthorized modification software from the computer.
    Edit out the "gs.apple.com" redirect from your hosts file, and then restart the computer for the host file changes to take affect. For steps to edit the Hosts file and allow iTunes to communicate with the update server, see iTunes: Troubleshooting iTunes Store on your computer, iPhone, iPad, or iPod—follow steps under the heading Blocked by configuration (Mac OS X / Windows) > Rebuild network information > The hosts file may also be blocking the iTunes Store. If you do not uninstall the unauthorized modification software prior to editing the hosts file, that software may automatically modify the hosts file again on restart.
    Avoid using an older or modified .ipsw file. Try moving the current .ipsw file (see Advanced Steps > Rename, move, or delete the iOS software file (.ipsw) below for file locations), or try restoring in a new user to ensure that iTunes downloads a new .ipsw.

Maybe you are looking for