Quantity related Scale pricing not considered during Goods receipt

Hello Group,
First thanks for looking into my issue.  I tried to follow the solution in SAP Note 401941 on assessing the right unit price as it relates to the quantity received during Goods receipt, but my ABAP developers are very green at this time and they cannot figure out where to place this code fix and how it would work.
Background on issue.
From quantity of 1 to 99, I want the price to be 4.00 each
From quantity of 100 and above, I want the price to be 3.00 each.
When doing goods receipts for quantities that have not reached 100 yet, it is still assessing 3.00 each.  I found the OSS note above that is really not helpful and was wondering if anyone else is using scale pricing and how their GRs are calculated for correct unit price.
Thanks all for your assistance.
Samantha

The scale pricing cannot be used to influence price during goods receipt. Goods Receipt will pick up the price from the purchasing document.
Suppose you want to have that the price be determined based on the quantity received over a period of time, you need to use rebate agreement.
The OSS note mentioned in your question says that you can determine the price based on the schedule line quantity during GR (not quantity at the time of GR). It will not solve your requirement.
Lakshman

Similar Messages

  • Error Quantity in stockkeeping unit is zero during Good Receipt

    Hi experts,
    I need a little help from you to solve a problem we are having.
    I'm trying to enter a Good Receipt with reference a transport purchase order. The system efectively suggest the quantity that is still open for the order 0.503 LB. But when I tried to post the GR, the system give me this error: "Quantity in stockkeeping unit is zero", message No. M7106.
    Here are some relevant information:
    Base unit of measure for the material is TO (tonne)
    90,388 LB (US pound) <=> 41 TO (tonne)
    Right now this quantity is in stock in transit
    Even is a very small quantity, What we want is make is zero.
    Thank in advance,
    Mairo.

    Hi Bhavesh,
    I ran MB5T and the relevant qty is there in Stock in transit. But despite there are 0.503 LB in order qty, there are 0.000 qty in base unit (TO). This is the problem.
    What the user really wants is make zero this stock in transit.
    Any other suggestion?
    Thanks,
    Mairo.

  • SA/PO item condition not followed during Goods Receipt

    Hi! Gurus,
    Could you please help in resolving the our issue on SA/PO item condition.  Thanks.
    During GR via MB01 of Scheduling Agreement/Purchase Order the FI document posting does not follow the SA/PO item condition for Gross Price, Customs - % and Broker - Qty
    The ff. notes has already been implemented in the SAP System
    OSS1278540 u2013 Exchange rate diff.calculated incorrectly for delivery costs
    OSS1335622 u2013 MIGO: Incorrect stock postings for group conditions
    OSS1394939 u2013 MIGO: Incorrect posting for delivery costs
    OSS1422885 u2013 MIRO: Error M8 100 "Table T169P: entry does not exist"
    OSS1520698 u2013 MIGO: Exchange rate difference for delivery costs
    Edited by: Karl Nikolai Jamoralin on Aug 22, 2011 9:49 AM

    Same problem we have faced after implementation of budgetory changes.
    SAP recommanded changes in program.
    Check with sap support.
    Regards
    Vijay

  • Excise tab page not displayed during goods receipt for material.

    Dear All,
      The issue is we are doing GR for a PO in MIGO.Now the excise tab page is displayed in case of all other matl except for one.The matl type is manufacturing matl for this particular matl.I have checked all the settings in J1ID, also checked the tax code they are ok.can anyone guide me with any other possible solutions to this.
    Thanks in advance,
    Akshay

    Same problem we have faced after implementation of budgetory changes.
    SAP recommanded changes in program.
    Check with sap support.
    Regards
    Vijay

  • Prevent quantity updating during Goods Receipt

    Hi,
    We have a particular requirement for a type of subcontracting process (not the standard SAP subcontracting) as mentioned below.
    We create a Purchase Order for a material (without a standard cost) and giving an account assignment category in the PO. The Net price mentioned in the PO is the processing charges for the vendor (service charges). It does not indicate price for the material.
    When we receive the finished material from the vendor, we perform a Goods receipt. The stock gets updated and accounting documents are created.
    Our requirement is to stop this quantity updating during Goods Receipt. But, at the same time, we would like the accounting documents to be created as we need to pay the vendor.
    Is there any way of achieving this?
    Pl let me know. Any inputs would be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Thanks for the response!
    I understand that in the standard process, the parent item inforecord takes care of the processing charges. But this is process that has been customized differently as the client has SAP as well as legacy systems talking to each other.
    Turning off the qty updating at the material type level will turn it off for all purchase orders created for the material at that particular plant which is something we would like to avoid.
    We would basically like to turn it off for particular purchase order type. The reason for turning it off is that after the GR is done, there is a separate process that comes from the legacy system and updates the same quantity of finished product and also posts the consumption of components.
    So, our basic requirement is , is it possible to turn off qty updating for the GR of a particular purchase order document type and yet create accounting document. Material is not a valuated material and has a standard cost zero.
    Any inputs in this regard will be helpful.
    Regards

  • Pricing at time of goods receipt not possible for this item

    We're receiving error Message no. 06634 Pricing at time of goods receipt not possible for this item when trying to change the PO Pricing Date Category from No Control to 5 GR Date.
    The error message is clear and reads:
    Pricing at time of goods receipt not possible for this item
    Message no. 06634
    Diagnosis
    For this purchasing document item, you wish to specify that a new price determination process is to be carried out at the time of goods receipt.
    System Response
    Pricing cannot be carried out for the item at the time of goods receipt because the price was either entered manually or copied from the last purchasing document.
    The scenario is that we have a contract reference on a PO and the contract condition records are to be maintained as a new price is valid each day.  The problem without this is that the new pricing will not be reflected in the GR.
    What is the solution to overcome this issue?
    NOTE:  the Info Record conditions are not being read during GR as the PO references a contract.

    For further clarification the PO is referencing a contract and as such not pulling the pricing information from the info record and instead pulling the price from the conditions on the contract. 
    I want to change the pricing date category from " No Control" to "5 GR Date" however I'm receiving the error message stated and unsure of how to make this change.
    The intent is not to create a new PO each day the condition record is created and instead we are utilizing one PO referencing one contract with multiple date delimited condition records containing the daily pricing.

  • Earmarked funds during goods receipt (GR) is not inherited from PO.

    Hi, Everybody u2026
    We are using Earmarked Funds relevant for FM updating, but, during goods receipt (GR) and invoice receipt (IR) it is not inherited from purchase order (PO).
    In ME21N the account assignment is F and the system ask us to enter the GL Account, Order and additional the Earmarked Funds. The system is deriving correctly the fund, the funds center and the commitment item from those entered in the Earmarked Funds.
    However, during goods receipt and invoice receipt, the Earmarked Funds is not inherited from purchase order (PO) besides the others account assignments (order, fund, funds center and commitment item ) in the coding block.
    Best regards,
    Thanks

    Hello,
    I will provide some hints:
    - If it is a service PO, please check the Note 972276 (Service Purchase orders only).
    - If the posting is related to Asset, please kindly check:
        a. Note 684659
        b. Check if you have a derivation rule in FMDERIVE with the function module FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET.
        c. Check in your FI-AA customizing if you have activated the account
          assignment element but you have not specified an account assignment type for
          account assignment object for APC balance sheet postings (see note 684659 for
          details).
    I hope it helps
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Quantity of labels to be print during good receive

    Hi experts!
    I have a problem with the quantity of labels to be print during good receive.
    The point is the following =
    -Material Master - Basic Unit of measure "Liters"
    -Purchase Order - is created with Basic Unit of measure "Liters"
    -Good Receive - I receive for example 20 liters, but stored in 2 drums for 10 liters each. As I store the drums, I want to print 2 labels, one for each drum.
    How can I do that?
    Thanks in advance for your reply!
    Regards,
    Viru.

    Hi
    I understand your requirement. There is no customization for this requirement. If you make 2 GR, then you get 2 labels. But practically it is not possible. And you need labels to paste is on drum. I will tell you what we have done. It may help you also.
    Ask you abaper to give page break for every quantity when it comes to Drum in the script or smart form by a logic. So that no of drums = number of pages.
    Make only for required unit of measure not for all
    Regards
    Antony

  • DESADV is not generated during Goods issue from VT02N.

    Hello,
    DESADV is generating during goods issue from VL02N.
    But DESADV is not generated during Goods issue from VT02N.
    Any idea what was missing?
    I maintained the variant of RV56ABST for Delivery message with output type LAVA and Medium 6 (EDI).
    Thanks,
    Venkat

    I got reply from SAP. It is as follows:
    Please goto tcode VL10CUC. For Profile 2000, please check whether
    indicator "No OutputDet." is flagged.
    Please unflag that indicator and then retest.
    Please read note 1410599 for more inforamtion.
    Thanks,
    Venkat.

  • Automatic Creation of Purchase order during Goods Receipt

    Hai Guys,
           Can you please tell me is there any ways to get a Automatic PO during Goods Receipt???
        Regards
        Jino.

    Config
    1.Automatic PO generation must be activated for the movment type in IMG>Inv Mgmt & Phy Inv> GR>Create PO automatically. ( Note that automatic PO is only possible for mvmt 101 & 161)
    2. The plant you are working with must be assigned to a standard purchase organisation.
    3. A default PO document type must be specified for the GR in IMG> MM>purchasing>specify default vaues for document types.
    Master Data
    1.In mateial master Auto PO is to be set.
    2.in Vendor Master Auto PO generation or agreed with him an indicator is to be set.
    3.Info-Record should exist with the combination of material,vendor and the auto PO flagged in info record.

  • QA495 Error message during Good Receipt

    Dear Gurus,
    we would like to perform a good receipt with a custom movement (ZD1 as copy of 101) in order to do not activate QM inspection in certain cases. In OMJJ we flagged ZD1 as u201CQM not activeu201D but, since in the material master an Inspection type (with Lot Origin 01) is set, the following error during good receipt (MIGO) occur:
    "Change the inspection stock of material RAP4829AA_AG in QM only
    Error message QA495"
    The problem can be that, in the material document that we are trying to save, the stock type is automatically set to u201C2 - Quality Inspectionu201D. If we change it manually, leaving it blank (unrestricted use), the good receipt is correctly performed, otherwise the QA495 error message appear.
    The questions are:
    Is not enough deactivate u201CQM activeu201D flag in OMJJ for a specific movement type?
    Otherwise, how can we drive stock type (in MIGO) by the movement type?
    Thanks a lot,
    Regards
    Ale

    Hi Anand,
    as you told:
    "As I understand your requirement, you want to carry out goods receipt with ZD1 movement type (which is a copy of 101) and for which you donu2019t want to generate any inspection lot."
    Correct, but this is done simply deactivating QM at mov type level in OMJJ (flag "QM not active")
    My requirement is also to perform good receipt putting stock automatically in unrestricted use, and not in QI
    The inspection lot is not generated (if I perform GR changing manually stock type to unrestricted), but I would like that it will be automatically done, and we cannot understand what drives this field (stock type), despite of I removed lot origin (and all other reference to 101 mov type) from ZD1 custom movement.
    I suppose is automatically inherits from PO, so the question is:
    How can I drive/set "stock type" to make it Blank (unrestricted use) in good receipt or in purchase order??
    Thanks for help
    Ale

  • Wrong shipment costs posting during good receipt

    We are having a problem when we post a good receipt for an inbound delivery in the transaction MIGO. We have created some account keys in order to classify and post shipment costs -specified in a shipment cost document- on specific balance accounts. The balance accounts determined by the OBYC transaction are right but posted values during good receipt do not match to registered values in the shipment cost document.
    The documents flow for this process is as follow:
    1. It is created a purchase order (ME21N).
    2. It is created an inbound delivery based on the purchase order (VL31N).
    3. It is created a shipment document based on the inbound delivery (VT01N).
    4. It is created a shipment costs document (VI01) for the shipment document where shipment costs are specified in its calculation schema
    5. It is created a good receipt for the inbound delivery of the step 2. The balance accounts are determined correctly but values do not match to registered values in the shipment cost document.
    Best Regards
    Guillermo

    Hi,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/93/74413b546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
    Kapil

  • Document type during Goods Receipt in Intercompany Transfer flow

    Hi,
    We create a PO, Delivery and GI in company A
    We do a Goods Receipt in company B.
    Can we customize that FI document type  ZZ is used during Goods Receipt in company B?
    Document type ZZ may only be used in the Intercompany flow.
    Where can I customize this setting?
    Thank you in advance,
    Best regards,
    Eric van Zundert.

    Hi,
      The following are the standard steps to create an accounting document type and assign it to a transaction.
    1) In T-code OBF4, click on "Financial accounting document types" and create a new document type.
    2)On the same T-code, Click on "Goods receipt document type" and assign the document type to the transaction.
    3)On the same T-code, Click on "Financial accounting No range" and assign the number range for each document type based on company code and fiscal year.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Maheshwari

  • Receiving Services as Materials in order not to perform goods receipt

    I am on a project that is implementing SRM in May. The company has decided to upload 15 Vendors for Services and to perform the goods receipts in order to achieve a 3 way match. One of the Vendors (Huge Spend) will not get a goods receipt performed as no one wants to perform the goods receipt (this was just decided yesterday).  We will create the shopping cart and SRM PO and pay the invoices in R/3. In order to do this we have to enter the shopping cart as a material in order not to have a goods receipt performed in SRM (as I am told). Has anyone ever experienced this? Is there any problems that we, as a company, may not be aware of Is there someone out there that has experienced this or close to this? Please advise. Thanks

    Dear Kimberly
    In SRM every implementation requires a backend systems and in any of the Technical scenarios goods receipt can be done in any of the system either in SRM or in R/3.
    However we can resrrict the goods receipts not done in SRM by modifying the role in PFCG and remove Confirmation of goods/servies from the role.
    This will force the users to do goods receitps in R/3 systems only.
    The Leading Po can be created in any of system either in SRM or in R/3.
    regards,
    Nimish Sheth
    NB - Do rewards points for helpful answer.

  • PIR reduction during goods receipt for strategy 10

    Hi Experts,
    I am using the net requirement planning strategy. i.e strategy 10. My requirement is I wanted the PIRs to be reduced when do goods receipt for the production orders.
    I know this is possible in strategy 11. But how how do it in strategy 10.
    Regards
    Prathib

    Hi Ayethebing,
    What you mentioned in correct. System may do the wrong net requirement calculation. Let me explain what is my requirement.
    I have planning plant, where I get the sales orders and the PIR from Depots. And the production for all these quantities should be done in production plant. I need to do the goods receipt in the production plant itself first and do a plant to plant material transfer to planning plant.
    But all the control of production should be with production plant. So I cant use the production in alternative plant because in this case i need to convert planned order in planning plant and while doing goods receipt the stock directly updates in planning plant.
    So I was thinking of loading the PIRs in the production plant directly and use strategy 10. But since the sales orders wont come to production plant, the PIRs wont recduce at all. So thought of thinking about reducing PIR during goods receipt.
    But I realized from what you explained, it would lead to wrong PIR calculation. Full mark to you.
    Now Iam thinking the solution in a different way. Please give me your inputs
    Iam creating a recusrive BOM in planning plant and I will assign special procurement key 70. i.e withdrawal from alternative plant. I will assign alternative plant as production plant.
    So when I run MRP in planning plant for the main product, I will get dependant requirement created in the production plant for the main material as I created the recursive BOM in planning plant.
    But Iam having only one issue to be resolved here as I understand. The planned order created in the planning plant during MRP is convertible.  Can I make it non convertible some how even if Iam having bill of material?
    Thanks in advance for your valuable inputs
    Regards
    Prathib

Maybe you are looking for