Query Executing in WAD and not in BEx Analyzer

Hi Experts,
I am creating a query to find the "Execution Time Analysis" in PP the query has been successfully running in WAD but it is not opening in BEx Analyzer and throwing a message called RSBOLAP 000 and RS_EXEPTION 107.
What will be the reason. could you please let me know.
Quickest solutions will be appreciated.
Phani.
Edited by: Sai Phani on Jul 17, 2008 12:06 PM

Hi
If you are in 2004s version then check the support package level.
Discuss with Basis regarding the support package.
Regards
M.A

Similar Messages

Query executes in RSRT but not in BEx Analyzer

Hi Everyone,
I have a query for an infocube and ods object, in the bex analyzer for the infocube the query executes which has around 5000 records but for the ods object which has also 5000 records comes up with this error.
<b>An exception with the type CX_SY_EXPORT_NO_SHARED_MEMORY occurred, but was
neither handled locally, nor declared in a RAISING
Message no. RS_EXCEPTION000</b>
when I execute the query in RSRT it comes up.
After closing and re logging into bex analyzer executes the query for the first but for the second time again it throws up this error.
What could be the problem? Can anyone please let me know. Its really really urgent.
Thanks,
Prashant.

hi Prashant,
try check in RSRT, after choose your query, click 'properties' and set cache mode to 'main memory cache without swapping'.
also check oss note 656060-OLAP: Cache main memory displacement not functioning.
hope this helps.
Symptom
Although one of the following two cache modes
Main Memory Cache Without Swapping (mode 1)
Main Memory Cache With Swapping (mode 2)
is set for a query, long runtimes occur when you execute the query. The statistics (table RSDDSTAT) display the database times.
If there is a heavy system load, the following message can also appear: RS_EXCEPTION000: No left space in shared memory.
Other terms
Cache, performance, displacement, shared buffer
Reason and Prerequisites
This problem occurs because the shared memory is insufficiently dimensioned.
<b>Solution</b>
Increase the amount of shared memory. The size of the shared memory should be at least 200 MB. You can refer to transaction RSRCACHE for the amount of memory reserved by the main memory cache (RSRCACHE -> Main Memory: Shared Memory/Buffer Reserved).
The corresponding settings are (at least):
rsdb/esm/buffersize_kb = 200000
and, as a precaution, also
rsdb/esm/max_objects = 10000.
Alternatively, for queries with large resulting quantities, you can convert the Cache Mode in transaction RSRT1 to
Cluster/Flat File Cache for Each Application Server (mode 3)
Cluster/Flat File Cache Across Each Application Server (mode 4)

Doubts about the advantages and disadvantages of BEx Analyzer

Hi people!
Do you know in specific. What are the advantages and disadvantages of BEx Analyzer?
and Do you know the limitations and scope of the bex analyzer?
Talking about the security issue. What kind of resticciones be applied to end-users to control information. Protecting system
resources and the information that the user uses, not be manipulated.
I hope you could answer my doubts
Ramon
Thanks

Hi!
The standard BEx BI 3.x tools, is no longer available with the SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI tools; however, it is part of the SAP BI add-on installation that, by default, will install the BW 3.x tools along with the newer BI 7.0 tools.
We want to prevent unauthorized download of data to excel sheets from users who have installed bex analyzer but are not authorized to do that. Certain users only have to access querys from web and shouldn't have to use reports from bex analyzer.
The only accepted way to access reports for all users is by using web querys published in our intranet. But many users have bex analyzer installed and we don't want that an unauthorized user download data to a excel sheet via bex analyzer.
I'm testing with one user with this roles, but bex web template and bex analyzer have similiar object authorizations, and i don't know if is possible prevent unauthorized download of data from excel sheets.
Final users don't access to bex analyzer by rrmx transaction
Until know i'm testing with this user roles:
1. ZBW:BEX_WEB:RFC (for web templates)
S_RFC:
ACTVT: 16
RFC_NAME:
RFC1
RSBOLAP_BICS
RSBOLAP_BICS_CONSUMER
RSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDER
RSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDER_VAR
RSOBJS_RFC_INTERFACE
RSRCI_LOCAL_VIEW
RSWRTEMPLATE
SDIFRUNTIME
SYST
RFC_TYPE: FUGR
2. ZBW:BEX:RFC (for Bex Analyzer):
ACTVT: 16
RFC_NAME:
RSOBJS_RFC_INTERFACE
RSR_XLS_RFC
RZX0
SDIFRUNTIME
SM02
SUNI
SYST
RFC_TYPE: FUGR
please take in count this points:
1. Prevent unauthorized download of data to excel sheets from users that should have accees only querys from web not bex analyzer (very important this point)=
2. what are the disadvantages of BEx Analyzer, if only if limited by excel...from other point like performance, workprocess with long runtimes, memory issues, for said something.
I don't know if i'm going by good way.
Somebody could help me?
Ramon

Giving web authorization but not giving bex analyzer authorization

Is there a way that I can give authorizations for a user only to look queries from web site but not from bex analyzer.

Hi!
If you dont give the authorization S_RFC to a user he can not work with Business explorer but he can access the queries from web
hope this helps
with regards
ashwin

Query Executed in Portal do not show entry in RSDDSTAT_DM

Hi
We are on BI 7 and I am tuning one query.The User has complained that in BEX it doesn't take time but in Portal it takes time. I have created 1 Aggregate and the query is using the aggregate. This is confirmed as I have executed the query in RSRT.I can get the DB time in RSDDSTAT_DM table.
I have executed the same query Portal but the query details is not reflected in table RSDDSTAT_DM . I have to confirm that even in Portal it is using the aggregate and I need the time it takes to run the query in the portal .
Kind regards,
Yogi

This should create an entry in RSDDSTAT_DM. Try this.
1. Launch the query in the Portal
2. Add "&PROFILING=X" to the end of the URL.
3. This should provide performance information at runtime...

Variable hierarchy display not changed (BEx analyzer)

Hi
We have a BEx query, in which a drilldown characteristic is displayed as an hierarchy
Hierarchy display is active
Selected hierarchy:
Name - constant
Version - customer exit variable
Customer exit calculates version from manual input variable.
We need to view the report in BEx Analyzer.
When the query is opened, we select manual input variables and the hierarcy's version is set correctly.
The issue is that when we change manual input variables at runtime, the data is refreshed,
but hierarchy display is not changed. The selected hierarchy's version remains unchanged.
In order to change hierarchy display, we need to open characteristic properties and change the selected hierarchy manually
or we need to reopen the query and provide another manual input variables.
Our system version is 7.01 patch level 9
Is there any way to fix this problem
Or some workaroud?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks

Michael, thank you for reply.
But I don't see how these notes may help me with my problem.
1753959 - I don't get a short dump
1745472, 1751321 - system displays all queried nodes, the problem is that if I input another variable, hierarchy version variable is calculated via user-exit properly (I see it in ABAP debugger), but displayed hierarchy has version, which was set when I opened query initially.
1717433 - nodes are returned with non-empty result. I can see that data is refreshed, hierarchy version is requested correctly, but is displayed incorrectly. We can see, for example, new hierarchy leaves, but in "n/a" node.
I tried to run the same report on system with version 7.01, patch level 12 and get the same behaviour.
My problem is similar to that described in notes 993151, 957219, but our system patch level is already higher.

Advantages and Disadvantages of BEx Analyzer

Dear All,
Please specify the ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES of using BEx Analyzer for reporting over a browser.Does the analyzer provide better performance?generate exhaustive reports?and found better by users since it is excel based?
Yours truly,
Ratish
[email protected]
+919820827647

Hello Ratish,
The advantages and disadvantages are primarily based on the light weight client and heavy client.
Excel -
1. It is heavy weight and needs a client installation
2. Analysis is easier , as excel functionalities can be used over BI data
3. People who know excel will like this
Web-
1. It is light weight and no installation needed at the client as browser will be available
2. Can not analyze the data from the report ( you need copy to excel)
In simple analysts and expert users like excel.
Users who just view the report and no more analysis will be happy with web.
Regards,
Sheik Bilal

Simple Query working on 10G and not working on 11gR2 after upgrade

Hi Folks,
This is the first time i am posting the query in this Blog.
I have a small issue which preventing the UAT Sigoff.
Simple query working fine on 10.2.0.1 and after upgrade to 11.2.0.1 its error out
10.2.0.4:
=====
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=1;
COUNT(*)
1
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=00001;
COUNT(*)
1
SQL> select ATTRIBUTE1 FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=1;
ATTRIBUTE1
00001
11.2.0.1:
=====
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01722: invalid number
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=00001
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01722: invalid number
SQL> select ATTRIBUTE1 FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1='1';
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1='00001';
COUNT(*)
1
SQL> select ATTRIBUTE1 FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1='00001';
ATTRIBUTE1
00001
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SQL > desc APPS.HZ_PARTIES
Name Type
======== ======
ATTRIBUTE1 VARCHAR2(150)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Changes:
Recently i upgraded the DB from 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.1
Query:
1.If the type of that row is VARCHAR,why it is working in 10.2.0.4 and why not working in 11.2.0.1
2.after upgrade i analyzed the table with "analyze table " query for all AP,AR,GL,HR,BEN,APPS Schemas--Is it got impact if we run analyze table.
Please provide me the answer for above two questions or refer the document is also well enough to understand.Based on the Answer client will sigoff to-day.
Thanks,
P Kumar

WhiteHat wrote:
the issue has already been identified: in oracle versions prior to 11, there was an implicit conversion of numbers to characters. your database has a character field which you are attempting to compare to a number.
i.e. the string '000001' is not in any way equivalent to the number 1. but Oracle 10 converts '000001' to a number because you are asking it to compare to the number you have provided.
version 11 doesn't do this anymore (and rightly so).
the issue is with the bad code design. you can either: use characters in the predicate (where field = 'parameter') or you can do a conversion of the field prior to comparing (where to_num(field) = parameter).
I would suggest that you should fix your code and don't assume that '000001' = 1I don't think that the above is completely correct, and a simple demonstration will show why. First, a simple table on Oracle Database 10.2.0.4:
CREATE TABLE T1(C1 VARCHAR2(20));
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('0001');
COMMIT;A select from the above table, relying on implicit data type conversion:
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
C1
1
0001Technically, the second row should not have been returned as an exact match. Why was it returned, let's take a look at the actual execution plan:
SELECT
FROM
TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(NULL,NULL,NULL));
SQL_ID g6gvbpsgj1dvf, child number 0
SELECT   * FROM   T1 WHERE   C1=1
Plan hash value: 3617692013
| Id | Operation         | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     2 |    24 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter(TO_NUMBER("C1")=1)
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statementNotice that the VARCHAR2 column was converted to a NUMBER, so if there was any data in that column that could not be converted to a number (or NULL), we should receive an error (unless the bad rows are already removed due to another predicate in the WHERE clause). For example:
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('.0001.');
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
SQL> SELECT
2    *
3 FROM
4    T1
5 WHERE
6    C1=1;
ERROR:
ORA-01722: invalid numberNow the same test on Oracle Database 11.1.0.7:
CREATE TABLE T1(C1 VARCHAR2(20));
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('0001');
COMMIT;
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
C1
1
0001
SELECT
FROM
TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(NULL,NULL,NULL));
SQL_ID g6gvbpsgj1dvf, child number 0
SELECT   * FROM   T1 WHERE   C1=1
Plan hash value: 3617692013
| Id | Operation         | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     2 |    24 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter(TO_NUMBER("C1")=1)
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('.0001.');
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
SQL> SELECT
2    *
3 FROM
4    T1
5 WHERE
6    C1=1;
ERROR:
ORA-01722: invalid numberAs you can see, exactly the same actual execution plan, and the same end result.
The OP needs to determine if non-numeric data now exists in the column. Was the database characterset possibly changed during/after the upgrade?
Charles Hooper
Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Account Query is taking longtime and not giving desired results

Hi,
I'm trying to run the following query to get code combination id for last six months with 1)no activity in gl_je_lines
2) Sum of begin balance and PTD is zero
Her's query :
select
cc.segment3 SEGMENT
from apps.gl_code_combinations cc,
apps.gl_balances bal,
apps.fnd_flex_values_vl ffvl,
apps.fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs,
(select period_name
from apps.gl_periods
where period_set_name ='abc Calendar'
and to_date(period_name,'Mon-YY') between add_months(sysdate,(6*-1)-1) and sysdate) p
where cc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = bal.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
and ffvl.FLEX_VALUE = cc.segment3
and ffvl.FLEX_VALUE_SET_ID = ffvs.flex_value_set_id
and ffvs.flex_value_set_id = 2222222
and bal.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID =555
and cc.CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID = 11111
and bal.period_name = p.period_name
and ffvl.ENABLED_FLAG = 'Y'
and ffvl.END_DATE_ACTIVE is null
and bal.TEMPLATE_ID IS NULL
and bal.actual_flag='A'
and bal.currency_code 'STAT'
and ffvl.creation_date <= add_months(sysdate,(6*-1)-1)
and cc.SEGMENT3 not in (
select
distinct gcc.SEGMENT3
from apps.gl_je_lines l
, apps.gl_code_Combinations gcc,
(select period_name
from apps.gl_periods
where period_set_name ='abc Calendar'
and end_date > add_months(last_day(sysdate),-1) and end_date <= last_day(sysdate)) lp
where l.code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
and gcc.CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID = 11111
and l.period_name=lp.period_name
and l.set_of_books_id = 555
and l.status='P')
group by cc.SEGMENT3
HAVING sum(abs(nvl(bal.BEGIN_BALANCE_DR,0))-abs(nvl(bal.BEGIN_BALANCE_CR,0))+abs(nvl(bal.PERIOD_NET_DR,0))-abs(nvl(bal.PERIOD_NET_CR,0))) = 0--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's Explain Plan
Operation Node Cost IO Cost CPU Cost Cardinality Object Name Options Object Type Optimizer
SELECT STATEMENT 5155 5094 554583434 1 ALL_ROWS
FILTER
HASH (GROUP BY) 5155 5094 554583434 1 GROUP BY
FILTER
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) 4 4 31301 1 GL_BALANCES BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ANALYZED
NESTED LOOPS 18 18 427467 1
MERGE JOIN (CARTESIAN) 14 14 396166 1 CARTESIAN
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) 4 4 49409 1 GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ANALYZED
NESTED LOOPS 8 8 82677 1
NESTED LOOPS 4 4 33268 1
NESTED LOOPS 4 4 31368 1
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) 1 1 8171 1 FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1 UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ANALYZED
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) 3 3 23196 1 FND_FLEX_VALUES BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ANALYZED
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) 2 2 15293 1 FND_FLEX_VALUES_N3 RANGE SCAN INDEX ANALYZED
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) 0 0 1900 1 FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1 UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ANALYZED
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) 2 2 33113 4 GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N3 RANGE SCAN INDEX ANALYZED
FILTER
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) 20 20 163416 1 GL_JE_LINES BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ANALYZED
NESTED LOOPS 5136 5076 545022343 1
MERGE JOIN (CARTESIAN) 5103 5043 544739760 4 CARTESIAN
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) 5 5 37587 1 GL_PERIODS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ANALYZED
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) 2 2 15043 4 GL_PERIODS_N2 RANGE SCAN INDEX ANALYZED
BUFFER (SORT) 5098 5038 544702173 7 SORT
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) 5098 5038 544702173 7 GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS FULL TABLE ANALYZED
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) 3 3 29414 36 GL_JE_LINES_N1 RANGE SCAN INDEX ANALYZED
BUFFER (SORT) 10 10 346757 1 SORT
INDEX (FULL SCAN) 6 6 313489 1 GL_PERIODS_U1 FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ANALYZED
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) 2 2 15493 1 GL_BALANCES_N1 RANGE SCAN INDEX ANALYZEDThis query is taking two hrs to get results :
How to tune this query to get results faster

Hi,
170 posts and still do not know how to use {noformat}{noformat} tags?
Please read <a href="https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2174552#9360002">How do I ask a question on the forums?</a>
If you have a performance issue have a look at <a href="https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2174552#9360003">How to improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow. </a>
Additionally when you put some code please enclose it between two lines starting with {noformat}{noformat}
i.e.:
{noformat}{noformat}
SELECT ...
{noformat}{noformat}
Also consider closing some of your questions when someone is answering. Looking at your profile:
Handle:      user518071
Status Level:      Newbie
Registered:      Jun 30, 2006
Total Posts:      170
Total Questions:      92 (58 unresolved) it still looks that you have 58 unresolved questions. Are they really all unresolved?
Regards.
Al

Passing values to query according to text and not key

Hi,
I have a query that accept the get from input filed customers values. the values should be the customers key.
I would like to pass text values to the query and want to get all customers that the texts exists in text description of the customers.
Can I do such thing?
Thanks
Ami

Ami Halm,
You will need to create your own web service to acomplish this, the following artice illustrates a similar example.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7000a4db-d4e2-2a10-ebaf-c6e1de637dbe
Regards,
Ahmed Salah

Query current report only and not since advertised but removing the since advertised give me multiple row

How can i query the current report only?
Note: The ScheduleToken is set to “Since Advertised”.
SQL Query:
Select
OfferName Name,
Recieved,
Failures,
ProgramsStarted 'Programs Started',
ProgramsFailure 'Program Errors',
ProgramsSuccess 'Program Success',
ProgramsFailureMIF 'Program Errors',
ProgramsSuccessMIF 'Program Success (MIF)',
PkgName Package,
PkgProgram Program,
CollectionName 'Target Collection',
PresentTime 'Available After',
ExpirationTime 'Expires After',
OfferID 'Advertisement ID'
From vOfferStatusSummarizerRoot
Where ScheduleToken = '0001128000080008'
Order by OfferName

Current report as in the latest advert?
if yes, this should work
Select top 1
OfferID 'Advertisement ID',
OfferName Name,
Recieved,
Failures,
ProgramsStarted 'Programs Started',
ProgramsFailure 'Program Errors',
ProgramsSuccess 'Program Success',
ProgramsFailureMIF 'Program Errors',
ProgramsSuccessMIF 'Program Success (MIF)',
PkgName Package,
PkgProgram Program,
CollectionName 'Target Collection',
PresentTime 'Available After',
ExpirationTime 'Expires After'
From vOfferStatusSummarizerRoot
Where ScheduleToken = '0001128000080008'
Order by Offerid
Blog: http://theinfraguys.com
Follow me at Facebook
The Infra Guys Facebook Page
Please remember to click Mark as Answer on the answer if it helps you in anyway

RWD Uperform and BW (Using BEX Analyzer)

We are currently trying to record our BW/BI training materials with uPerform. When we try to execute the actual query to produce the report while recording, our PCs lock up and no results are returned. It actually takes closing out UPerform and BEX to get the system operational again.
Is anyone else having problems with BEX and UPerofrm?
We have tried changing settings within UPerform but have had no luck.
Suggestions anyone?
Thank you for any help...

We finally received this following information from RWD:
I believe this may be a recently discovered issue with recording Business Warehouse while the Recorder toolbar/window is visible. Could you try minimizing the toolbar before starting the recording and see if that resolves the issue? To minimize the toolbar, you will need to click the button that looks like a window with a red arrow pointing down.
Please let me know if this resolves the issue. If not, I should be able to set up a Webex session to troubleshoot this afternoon before 2 PM if you are available.
Thanks,
Chandra Mullineaux | RWD Senior Product Support Specialist | RWD Technologies | www.rwd.com
I was able to record a UPerform with the minimized tool bar, but the results in the task and screen flow section are of no use.
The Procedure did record with partial screen prints (not always the relevant data), but with the direction of 'Click Control'.
So technically this fix works, but the documentation is still pretty useless.

Front-end memory and limitation cells of the BEX Analyzer

Hi BI experts,
After BW upgrade from BI 7.3 to BI 7.4 some heavy workbooks stopping to work, the error is "Client Out of Memory", the cause of this error is the memory capacity of .NET framework, this process can allocate a maximum of approximately 1.2 gigabytes (GB).
The notes 1040454 and 1411545 says that it´s possible to execute something like 750,000 cells but we made some adjusts and we could increase it until 1,800,000 cells, below some configuration we´ve made:
Query Designer:
Result Rows Always
Supress;
Display as Text or key;
Supress Zeros as Active (All Values = 0) and Effect on rows and columns.
Bex Analyzer:
Display Sort Icons Disable;
Apply formating Disable;
Allow navegation Disable;
We need some orientation how to further increase this limitation, or leaving the query lighter or increasing the memory limitation of .net framework or backing to BEX 3.5 funcionalities.
Has anyone encountered such problems in the update? Some alternative solution ?
Thanks !

Hello Caio,
The limitation lies on .Net Framework 32 bits which can handle 1.2 gigabytes.
You are reaching 1.8 Million because your datacells has no data or almost no data.
There is a KBA documenting your issue: SAP Note 1860872
There you will find a recommendation of Openhub, that allows you to extract data.
Just remember that BEx Analyzer is a tool for query navigation, not mass data extraction.
Kind Regards,
Edward John
SAP AGS

Change the layout of a query items in BEx analyzer

Hi,
I had developed a query, so when it is viewed in BEx analyzer the items(Char and Keyfigures) that i had used in rows and columns are displayed in analyzer.
Apart from this in report i can see the items i had used,
in top corner.
So i need to change the layout of these items in top corner ie. 1. all charac
2. all keyfigures
or combination of both in priority wise, is it possible.
Pl post.

Hi,
You can delete them from Query output and Save it as workBook.Then Open the workbook.You will not see them again whenever you open your workbook.
Right click on result area of output>properties>interaction tab-->enable 'Refresh Query when opening workbook' and save the work book so that whenever workbook is opened,you will get selection screen.
Pl dont forget to reward points if it helps.

BEx Analyzer report "New Formula", "Scaling Factor" property not working

Hi Experts,
I have created a New Formula(Ex:- Dispatches * 2) in BEx Analyzer report. The result of the "New Formula" is 2000. When I maintain Scaling Factor as "1000" to the New Formula properties, the result should be 2 but here 2000 is coming again.
When I maintain this property to the existing keyfigure in Analyzer report, it is working fine.
Please help me in this whether Scaling Factor can be applied to the New Formula or not in BEx Analyzer report. If it works, what changes we have to make to the New formula.
SAPKW73010 is applied already to SAP BW-730
Please see the attachment.

Sree,
Is the variable ABC the new one that you've created with Scaling factor setting given? The message you get on doing a syntax check on the query indicates that settings are ignored for use beyond the query.
And if this is the case, this is a known issue.
However such settings will work on existing keyfigures as it is in your case.
What you can hence do for this new variable is that if you are developing reports on top of this bex query, you can make the scaling factor setting at the report level.
Let me know if this works for you.
Regards,
Srilakshmi B

Query Executing in WAD and not in BEx Analyzer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for