Query not considering function based index in oracle 11g

I have a query which used Function Based Index when run in oracle 9i but when I run the same query
without any changes, it does not consider index. Below is the query:
SELECT distinct patient_role.domain_key, patient_role.patient_role_key,
patient_role.emergency_contact_name,
patient_role.emergency_contact_phone, patient_role.emergency_contact_note,
patient_role.emergency_contact_relation_id,
patient_role.financial_class_desc_id, no_known_allergies, patient_role.CREATED_BY,
patient_role.CREATED_TIMESTAMP,
patient_role.CREATED_TIMESTAMP_TZ, patient_role.UPDATED_BY, patient_role.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP,
patient_role.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP_TZ,
patient_role.discontinued_date
FROM encounter, patient_role
WHERE patient_role.patient_role_key = encounter.patient_role_key
AND UPPER(TRIM(leading :SYS_B_0 from encounter.account_number)) = UPPER(TRIM(leading :SYS_B_1 from
:SYS_B_2))
AND patient_role.discontinued_date IS null
AND encounter.discontinued_date IS null ;
Index definition:
CREATE INDEX "user1"."IX_TRIM_ACCOUNT_NUMBER" ON "user1."ENCOUNTER" (UPPER(TRIM(LEADING
'0' FROM "ACCOUNT_NUMBER")), "PATIENT_ROLE_KEY", "DOMAIN_KEY", "DISCONTINUED_DATE")
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "user1"
Database : Oracle 11g (11.2.0.3)
O/S : Linux 64 bit (the query does not consider index even on windows os)
Any suggestions?
-Onkar
Edited by: onkar.nath on Jul 2, 2012 3:32 PM

Onkar,
I don't appreciate you posting this question in several forums at the same time.
If I would know you also posted this on Asktom, I wouldn't even have bothered.
As to your 'issue':
First of all: somehow cursor_sharing MUST have been set to FORCE. Oracle is a predictable system, not a fruitmachine.
Your statement the '0' is replaced by a bind variable anyway is simply false. If you really believe it is not false, SUBMIT a SR.
But your real issue is not Oracle: it is your 'application', which is a mess anyway. Allowing for alphanumeric numbers is a really bad idea.
Right now you are already putting workaround on workaround on workaround on workaround.
Issue is the application: it is terminal., and you either need to kill it, or to replace it.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Similar Messages

Query Transformation in Function Based Index's Expression

Hi All,
I am having a wired issue with Function Based Indexes on Orcale 10.2.0.3 running on Solaris 5.9.
I have created two FBI on two tables using following syntax.
CREATE INDEX EQHUB.IDX_BBO_WRT_DES_FBI ON EQHUB.BBO_WARRANT_PRICING (CASE WHEN latest_version_flag = 'Y' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END);
CREATE INDEX EQHUB.IDX_BBO_DES_FBI ON EQHUB.BBO_DESCRIPTIVE_DATA (CASE WHEN latest_version_flag = 'Y' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END);
For the second command (IDX_BBO_DES_FBI), when i query DBA_IND_EXPRESSIONS view, i found that Oracle has done some kind of QUERY TRANSFORMATION (?) and converted
FBI expression to CASE "LATEST_VERSION_FLAG" WHEN 'Y' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END.At the same time,EXPRESSION on first index is not changed.
Now,my question is what has made transformation to occure only for second index.
I also found that inspite of highly SELECTIVE nature of both the indexes, only SECOND index is being used by CBO (for which trasnformation occured)
and IDX_BBO_WRT_DES_FBI is not being used(FTS is happening instead).
Query is using same expression for both the tables as
(CASE WHEN latest_version_flag = 'Y' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END)=1
INDEX_NAME                          TABLE_NAME                          COLUMN_EXPRESSION
IDX_BBO_WRT_DES_FBI                 BBO_WARRANT_PRICING                 CASE WHEN "LATEST_VERSION_FLAG"='Y' THEN 1 ELSE NULL END
IDX_BBO_DES_FBI                     BBO_DESCRIPTIVE_DATA                CASE "LATEST_VERSION_FLAG" WHEN 'Y' THEN 1 ELSE NULL ENDI read that expression should be evaluated including CASE of characters and spaces in query.Is that true?
Appreciating responses in advance.

Randolf.
It's a shame that I forgot to look into the full execution plan information to check how Oracle really handles my queries.
Look here(edited for clarity):
explain plan for
select /*+ case1 ordered use_nl(x, y) */ count(case c1
    when '1' then 1
    when '2' then 2
    when '3' then 3
    else 4
end) from
(select level from dual connect by level <= 300000) x,
(select
from t1
) y;
| Id | Operation                       | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |      |     1 |     2 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                 |      |     1 |     2 |            |          |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                  |      |     3 |     6 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    VIEW                         |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |       |            |          |
|   5 |      FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | T1   |     3 |     6 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - (#keys=0) COUNT(CASE WHEN "T1"."C1"='1' THEN 1 WHEN "T1"."C1"='2' THEN
       2 WHEN "T1"."C1"='3' THEN 3 ELSE 4 END )[22]
   2 - (#keys=0) "T1"."C1"[CHARACTER,1]
   4 - "DUAL".ROWID[ROWID,10], LEVEL[4]
   5 - "DUAL".ROWID[ROWID,10]
   6 - "T1"."C1"[CHARACTER,1]
32 rows selected.
explain plan for select /*+ case2 ordered use_nl(x, y) */ count(case
    when c1 = '1' then 1
    when c1 = '2' then 2
    when c1 = '3' then 3
    else 4
end) from
(select level from dual connect by level <= 300000) x,
(select
from t1
) y;
| Id | Operation                       | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |      |     1 |     2 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                 |      |     1 |     2 |            |          |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                  |      |     3 |     6 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    VIEW                         |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |       |            |          |
|   5 |      FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | T1   |     3 |     6 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - (#keys=0) COUNT(CASE WHEN "T1"."C1"='1' THEN 1 WHEN "T1"."C1"='2' THEN
       2 WHEN "T1"."C1"='3' THEN 3 ELSE 4 END )[22]
   2 - (#keys=0) "T1"."C1"[CHARACTER,1]
   4 - "DUAL".ROWID[ROWID,10], LEVEL[4]
   5 - "DUAL".ROWID[ROWID,10]
   6 - "T1"."C1"[CHARACTER,1]As you exactly mentioned, I was executing different SQL but actually same queries!
Thanks for pointing my flaws.
PS) OP, forgive me for bothering you with off-topic things. :)
================================
Dion Cho - Oracle Performance Storyteller
http://dioncho.wordpress.com (english)
http://ukja.tistory.com (korean)
================================
Edited by: Dion_Cho on Feb 10, 2009 5:45 AM
Typo

Err ORA-00439 feature not enabled: function-based indexes

How can I enable function based indexes?
Database Version is 8i Release 8.1.6.0.0.
I've done the following steps:
The init-parameter compatible is set to 8.1.0.0.0.
I've altered the session parameters
QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY to TRUSTED and
QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED to TRUE.
But it still doesn't work.
I would appreciate your help.
Martin

Function Based Index feature is not available in the Standard Edition of Oracle. This feature is available ONLY in the Enterprise and Personal Editions.
Use the V$OPTION view to see the list of installed options.
If the option is installed, you will see for "Function-based indexes":
PARAMETER VALUE
Function-based indexes TRUE
null

Impdp not importing function based index correctly.

We noticed that a process running in our develop database was running much faster than in the production database. After investigating we found that on the development database the process was using an index on the main large table and on the production database the index was ignored and full table scans of the large table were being used.
The data in the tables was the same, statistics were up-to-date, etc. Looking closer we saw that the index on the production database was function based because it had the DESC keyword on one column in the index. On the development database all columns of the index were ASC and thus it was a "normal" index. This was very confusing since we had just refreshed the development database from production using expdp/impdp. I ran impdp with the sqlfiles option to capture the DDL from the export file for the index in question from the production database:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "SYSADM"."PS_SF_1098_ITEM" ON "SYSADM"."PS_SF_1098_ITEM" ("EMPLID", "SF_TIN", "CALENDAR_YEAR", "SEQ_NO" DESC, "DTL_SEQ_NBR")
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE(INITIAL 40960 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "PSINDEX" ;
I then dropped the table/index in the development database and reimported just this one table. Sure enough, the index wasn't created as a function based index (no DESC keyword on SEQ_NO column):
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "SYSADM"."PS_SF_1098_ITEM" ON "SYSADM"."PS_SF_1098_ITEM" ("EMPLID", "SF_TIN", "CALENDAR_YEAR", "SEQ_NO", "DTL_SEQ_NBR")
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 40960 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "PSINDEX" ;
I've researched this extensively and can't find any information on why this is happening. Any ideas before I open a SR?
BTW.... version is 11.1.0.7 patchset 31 on Windows Server 2003. Both dev and prod environments are identical.
Thanks,
Dan

Working on something else I noticed the following two "hidden" init.ora parameters in both my dev and production databases:
*._disable_function_based_index=TRUE
*._ignore_desc_in_index=TRUE
The first parameter explains why the index (function based) was being ignored in my production database. The second explains why the index is created without the DESC keyword in my dev database from an export from my prod database. I guess you do learn something new every day :)
These databases are used by Peoplesoft applications and I found several posts saying that function based indexes created by Peoplesoft were causing performance and/or data validity problems and users were instructed to set the above parameters so the FIB's weren't used. So, everything is working as expected/designed. I will contact Peoplesoft Tech Support to see if users are still encouraged to set the above parameters.
Dan

Why do we need query rewrite enabled for a function-based index?

Oracle 9i
========
I have searched a few sites but could not find any content on it. The question is why do we need to implement query rewrite enabled when we are trying out a function-based index?
Thanks in advance.

You don't, that's a legacy requirement from the early days of function based indexes in Oracle 8i. Here's a quick example running under 9.2.0.6
drop table t1;
create table t1 as
select
from
     all_objects
where
     rownum <= 30000
create or replace function pl_func(i_vc     varchar2)
return varchar2
deterministic
as
begin
     return soundex(i_vc);
end;
-- set the worst case scenario
alter session set query_rewrite_enabled = false;
alter session set query_rewrite_integrity = enforced;
create index t1_i1 on t1(pl_func(object_name));
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't1')
set autotrace traceonly explain
select
     object_name
from t1
where pl_func(object_name) = 'T513'
set autotrace offResults (after set feedback off)
SQL> @temp
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1429545322
| Id | Operation                   | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |       |    27 |   675 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1    |    27 |   675 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_I1 |    27 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("TEST_USER"."PL_FUNC"("OBJECT_NAME")='T513')
SQL> spool offRegards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes

As we all know , Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes.
But i'm very confused .
Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes ?? what's its essential?

Creating a function based index creates a hidden virtual column (you'll see it if you query user_tab_cols) and once you index a virtual column you can no longer shrink the table:orcl> create table t1(c1 number,c2 as (c1 * 2)) segment creation immediate;
Table created.
orcl> alter table t1 enable row movement;
Table altered.
orcl>
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
Table altered.
orcl> create index i2 on t1(c2);
Index created.
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
alter table t1 shrink space
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-10631: SHRINK clause should not be specified for this object
orcl>so the issue is not with function based indexes per se, it is a level beneath that. Perhaps because the virtual column has no physical existance, when the row is moved there is no reason for Oracle to realize that an index needs updating? I haven't attempted to reverse engineer this, I would be interested to know if anyone else has.

URGENT - Function based indexes

Hi,
I have a table with huge amount of data and hence I have created
a function-based (Upper) index on one of the character NOT
NULL field which is very likely to be used for query purposes.
First of all though I can create ordinary normal field based
indexes in my user I cannot create a function-based index, why
That had to be created thru SYS user. Secondly I my query
invloving this function is not using the index and instead doing
a full-table scan. Problem outlined below :
Table : PLZPOST, USER / OWNER : PARTNER, FIELD : ORT
INDEX created on UPPER(ORT) in SYS user -
Create index upper_plz_ort on partner.plzpost (upper(ort))
When I give any of the following queries instead of using the
resp. index as mentioned in Oracle DOC it just does a full table
scan (checked thru Explain Plan) :
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) is not null;
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) like upper('saar%')
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) = 'SAARBRUECKEN'
etc etc
If anyone has used Function-based indexes in Oracle 8i could you
please tell me where am I going wrong. Is it because my Table
belongs to PARTNER and Index to SYS (tried running the above
queries under SYS user also but still did not work) ?? If so how
can I grant access on an Index to PARTNER from SYS ??
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers
Rashmi
null

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rashmi Rungta ([email protected]):
Hi,
I have a table with huge amount of data and hence I have created
a function-based (Upper) index on one of the character NOT
NULL field which is very likely to be used for query purposes.
First of all though I can create ordinary normal field based
indexes in my user I cannot create a function-based index, why
That had to be created thru SYS user. Secondly I my query
invloving this function is not using the index and instead doing
a full-table scan. Problem outlined below :
Table : PLZPOST, USER / OWNER : PARTNER, FIELD : ORT
INDEX created on UPPER(ORT) in SYS user -
Create index upper_plz_ort on partner.plzpost (upper(ort))
When I give any of the following queries instead of using the
resp. index as mentioned in Oracle DOC it just does a full table
scan (checked thru Explain Plan) :
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) is not null;
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) like upper('saar%')
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) = 'SAARBRUECKEN'
etc etc
If anyone has used Function-based indexes in Oracle 8i could you
please tell me where am I going wrong. Is it because my Table
belongs to PARTNER and Index to SYS (tried running the above
queries under SYS user also but still did not work) ?? If so how
can I grant access on an Index to PARTNER from SYS ??
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers
Rashmi<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Function-based indexes in 8i

How can I enable function-based indexes on a already created
database. Is an Installation/Db Creation setting?
On another database I am able to create function-based indexes.
Any help appreciated.
Ashish
null

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rashmi Rungta ([email protected]):
Hi,
I have a table with huge amount of data and hence I have created
a function-based (Upper) index on one of the character NOT
NULL field which is very likely to be used for query purposes.
First of all though I can create ordinary normal field based
indexes in my user I cannot create a function-based index, why
That had to be created thru SYS user. Secondly I my query
invloving this function is not using the index and instead doing
a full-table scan. Problem outlined below :
Table : PLZPOST, USER / OWNER : PARTNER, FIELD : ORT
INDEX created on UPPER(ORT) in SYS user -
Create index upper_plz_ort on partner.plzpost (upper(ort))
When I give any of the following queries instead of using the
resp. index as mentioned in Oracle DOC it just does a full table
scan (checked thru Explain Plan) :
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) is not null;
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) like upper('saar%')
select * from PLZPOST where upper(ort) = 'SAARBRUECKEN'
etc etc
If anyone has used Function-based indexes in Oracle 8i could you
please tell me where am I going wrong. Is it because my Table
belongs to PARTNER and Index to SYS (tried running the above
queries under SYS user also but still did not work) ?? If so how
can I grant access on an Index to PARTNER from SYS ??
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers
Rashmi<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Problem creating a function based index

Hi,
Database: 8.0.6
OS: win 2000 server
I want to create a function based index as shown below:
sql> create index new_index on A_INP_PATIENTS_ADMT(bus_unit, admit_status_flag, nvl(clinical_discharge_yn,'N'), ward_code)
When i press return its showing error,
"ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis"
Please show me how to rewrite this query to build function based index.
Best Regards,
Edited by: ateeqrahman on Jun 6, 2010 2:34 PM

Your sql is fine:
SQL> CREATE TABLE A_INP_PATIENTS_ADMT(
2                                   bus_unit number,
3                                   admit_status_flag varchar2(1),
4                                   clinical_discharge_yn varchar2(1),
5                                   ward_code varchar2(10)
6                                  )
7 /
Table created.
SQL> create index new_index on A_INP_PATIENTS_ADMT(bus_unit, admit_status_flag, nvl(clinical_discharge_yn,'N'), ward_code)
2 /
Index created.
SQL> You did not post Oracle version. Most likely, you are on some older version that does not support FBI. Otherwise, post your version and table description and create index statement execution showing all errors you are getting.
SY.

Function-based index error due to fine-grained security

Hi, i'm working on Oracle version 9.2.0.5.
I'm trying to create a function-based index but i'm getting an error due to fine-grained security. I checked resource_view but if i'm not wrong I should have all necessary roles. I also added xdbadmin to this user to be sure.
I tried also to alter my session but it didn't worked.
Connected to Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.5.0
Connected as test_ste
SQL>
SQL> create index fbidx_schede_xml
2 on schede_progetti_xml p
3 (p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal());
create index fbidx_schede_xml
on schede_progetti_xml p
(p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal())
ORA-28133: full table access is restricted by fine-grained security
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 0
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL>
SQL> alter session set query_rewrite_enabled = true;
Session altered
SQL> alter session set query_rewrite_integrity = trusted;
Session altered
SQL> create index fbidx_schede_xml
2 on schede_progetti_xml p
3 (p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal());
create index fbidx_schede_xml
on schede_progetti_xml p
(p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal())
ORA-28133: full table access is restricted by fine-grained security
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 0
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> select * from user_role_privs;
USERNAME                       GRANTED_ROLE                   ADMIN_OPTION DEFAULT_ROLE OS_GRANTED
TEST_STE                      CONNECT                        NO           YES          NO
TEST_STE                      CTXAPP                         NO           YES          NO
TEST_STE                      RESOURCE                       NO           YES          NO
TEST_STE                      XDBADMIN                       NO           YES          NO
SQL> This are ACL on my schema:
<ACL>
    <acl description="Private:All privileges to OWNER only and not accessible to others" xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/acl.xsd" xmlns:dav="DAV:"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/acl.xsd                           http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/acl.xsd">
      <ace>
        <principal>dav:owner</principal>
        <grant>true</grant>
        <privilege>
          <all/>
        </privilege>
      </ace>
    </acl>
</ACL>I tried to create a similar function-based index on Oracle 10.2.0.3 without any problem and without touching any ACL, is an Oracle 9.2.0.5 problem?
Thanks for your attention.

I didn't really (production wise)work yet with VPD. I know a lot is based on DBMS_RLS and I guess (IF it is VPD related) it should be to hard to find in the doc's how you could check what is beyond your privileges. As a DBA I noticed that even the dba account SYSTEM isn't always allow to export the full content for the tables anymore.
There is a privilege that grants you all access that you need, despite the fact that you are not allowed to read certain rows from a table. Look it up.
In all, as I said, it looks like account is not allowed to see all data from a table. In that respect it sounds logical that you also are, in that case, not allowed to build a function based index on that data

Function Based Index - Query Performance

HI,
Good Day to All..
I'd like to use function based indexes on following column(to_char(ps.user_pc_id)).
Whereas this column is part of PRIMARY KEY.
Is it possible to create a function based index on PRIMARY KEY Column?
Attached below is the query with the explain plan ...
TO_CHAR Expression - Performance
Thanks for your reply.

DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> create table dt_fbi_pk(id varchar2(20));
Table created.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> drop table dt_fbi_pk;
Table dropped.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> create table dt_fbi(id number);
Table created.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> create index dt_fbi_idx on dt_fbi(to_char(id));
Index created.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_pk primary key (id);
Table altered.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> select constraint_name,constraint_type, index_name from user_constraints where table_name='DT_FBI';
CONSTRAINT_NAME                C INDEX_NAME
DT_FBI_PK                      P DT_FBI_PK
1 row selected.When we created the primary key constraint, Oracle created a new index rather than using the existing one because....
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi drop primary key;
Table altered.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> select index_name from user_indexes where table_name ='DT_FBI';
INDEX_NAME
DT_FBI_IDX
1 row selected.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_pk primary key (id) using index dt_fbi_idx;
alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_pk primary key (id) using index dt_fbi_idx
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14196: Specified index cannot be used to enforce the constraint.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_uk unique(id) using index dt_fbi_idx;
alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_uk unique(id) using index dt_fbi_idx
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14196: Specified index cannot be used to enforce the constraint.We can't use a function based index to enforce a unique or primary key constraint. Changing the syntax does not help..
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_uk unique(TO_CHAR(id)) using index dt_fbi_idx;
alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_uk unique(TO_CHAR(id)) using index dt_fbi_idx
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifierWe can create a unique index however
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> drop index dt_fbi_idx;
Index dropped.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> create unique index dt_fbi_idx on dt_fbi(to_char(id));
Index created.but we still can't use it to enforce a unique or primary key constraint
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_pk primary key (id) using index dt_fbi_idx;
alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_pk primary key (id) using index dt_fbi_idx
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14196: Specified index cannot be used to enforce the constraint.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_uk unique(id) using index dt_fbi_idx;
alter table dt_fbi add constraint dt_fbi_uk unique(id) using index dt_fbi_idx
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14196: Specified index cannot be used to enforce the constraint.So no, you can't use it for a primary key. If you just want to enforce uniqueness then yes, you can do it with a unique index, but not a constraint.
DTYLER_APP@pssdev2> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.4.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
5 rows selected.HTH
Daviid

FUNCTION-BASED INDEX ( ORACLE 8I NEW FEATURE )

제품 : ORACLE SERVER
작성날짜 : 2004-08-16
FUNCTION-BASED INDEX ( ORACLE 8I NEW FEATURE )
==============================================
SCOPE
10g Standard Edition(10.1.0) 이상 부터 Function-based Index 기능이 지원된다.
Explanation
1. 개요
     Function-based index는, 함수(function)이나 수식(expression)으로 계산
된 결과에 대해 인덱스를 생성하여 사용할 수 있는 기능을 제공한다.
     질의 수행 시 해당 함수나     수식을 처리하여     결과를 가져 오는 것이 아니라,
     인덱스 형태로 존재하는 미리 계산되어 있는 결과를 가지고 처리하므로
     성능 향상을 기할 수 있다.
2. 제약사항
1) aggregate function 에 대한 function-based index 생성 불가.
(예 : sum(...) )
2) LOB, REF, nested table 컬럼에 대한 function-based index 생성 불가.
3. 주요 특징
     1) cost-based optimizer에 의해 사용됨.
     2) B*Tree / bitmap index로 생성 가능.
     3) 산술식 (arithmetic expression), PLSQL function, SQL built-in
function 등에 적용 가능.
     4) 함수나 수식으로 처리된 결과에 대한 range scan 가능
     5) NLS SORT 지원
     6) SELECT/DELETE를 할 때마다 함수나 수식의 결과를 계산하는 것이 아니라
     INSERT/UPDATE 시 계산된 값을 인덱스에 저장.
     7) 질의 속도 향상
     8) object column이나 REF column에 대해서는 해당 object에 정의된
     method에 대해 function-based index 생성 가능.
4. 생성 방법
     CREATE [UNIQUE | BITMAP ] INDEX <index_name>
     ON <tablename> (<index-expression-list>)
     <index-expression-list> -> { <column_name> | <column_expression> }
     예) CREATE INDEX EMP_NAME_INDEX ON EMP (UPPER(ENAME));
     CREATE INDEX EMP_SAL_INDEX ON EMP( SAL + COMM, empno);
     * Function-based index를 생성하기 위해서는 QUERY REWRITE 권한이
     부여 되어 있어야만 한다.
     예) GRANT QUERY REWRITE TO SCOTT;
5. Function-Based Index 사용을 위한 사전 작업
     1) Function-based index는 cost based optimizer에서만 사용 가능하므로,
     테이블에 대해 미리 analyze 해 주는 것이 바람직하다.
     그리고 init 파일에서 OPTIMIZER_MODE 를 FIRST_ROWS 나 ALL_ROWS 등으
로 지정하거나 HINT 등을 사용하여 cost based optimizer가 사용되도록
한다.
     2) init 파일에서 COMPATIBLE 파라미터 값을 8.1 이상으로 설정되어 있어야
한다.
     ( 예 : COMPATIBLE = 8.1.6 )
     3) session/instance level 에서 QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED 값이 TRUE 지정
되어 있어야 한다.
     ( 예 : ALTER SESSION SET QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED = TRUE; )
6. 예제
     1) init 파라미터에서 다음과 같이 지정
     compatible = 8.1.6 (반드시 8.1이상이어야 한다)
     query_rewrite_enabled = true
     query_rewrite_integrity = trusted
     2) SCOTT 유저에서 function_based_index 생성
     create index idx_emp_lower_ename
     on emp
     ( lower(ename) ) ;
     3) EMP table analyze
     analyze table emp compute statistics ;
     4) PLAN_TABLE 생성
     @ ?/rdbms/admin/utlxplan.sql
     5) Cost based optimizer 선택
     alter session set optimizer_mode = FIRST_ROWS ;
     6) Query 실행
     explain plan set statement_id='qry1' FOR
     select empno, ename
     from emp
     where lower(ename) = 'ford' ;
     7) PLAN 분석
     SELECT LPAD(' ',2*level-2)||operation||' '||options||' '||object_name query_plan
     FROM plan_table
     WHERE statement_id='qry1'
     CONNECT BY prior id = parent_id
     START WITH id = 0 order by id ;
     -> 결과
     QUERY_PLAN
     SELECT STATEMENT
     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID EMP
     INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_EMP_LOWER_ENAME
7. 결론
Function-based index는 적절하게 사용될 경우 성능상의 많은 이점을 가져
온다. Oracle8i Designing and Tuning for Performance에서도 가능한 한
Function-based index를 사용하는 것을 권장하고 있으며, LOWER(), UPPER()
등의 함수를 사용하여 불가피하게 FULL TABLE SCAN을 하는 경우에 대해서도
효과적으로 처리해 줄 수 있는 방안이라 할 수 있다.
Reference Documents
-------------------

Partha:
From the Oracle8i Administrators Guide:
"Table owners should have EXECUTE privileges on the functions used in function-based indexes.
For the creation of a function-based index in your own schema, you must be
granted the CREATE INDEX and QUERY REWRITE system privileges. To create
the index in another schema or on another schemas tables, you must have the
CREATE ANY INDEX and GLOBAL QUERY REWRITE privileges."
Hope this helps.
Peter

Oracle 8i Function-based index

Hi,
i have problem with making Oracle8i to use function-based index. I am using version 8.1.6 Enterprise Edition.
So here is the test I did
CREATE INDEX first_name_index ON customer ( UPPER(first_name)) ;
alter session set QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED = TRUE;
alter session set QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY=TRUSTED;
ANALYZE TABLE customer COMPUTE STATISTICS;
alter index first_name_index compute statistics;
Everything seemed to be as required by Oracle but it doesn't use this function-based index when I make
select *
from customer
where upper(first_name) like 'J%';
I test it on large table and with table with few hundred rows. I don't have NULLs in that field.
Can anyone help me with this.

I would not create an index to have it prepared for an ORDER BY. An index is quite costly in DML opperations and space as well. More, a function based index will be costlier as the function has to be called for every read and/or write.
Do not forget that indexes a created for a direct access to data and not for sorting purposes.
George

Function-based index, NOT NULL bug?

ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_MODE = FIRST_ROWS_10;
ALTER SESSION SET QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED = TRUE;
CREATE TABLE xxx (code CHAR(6) NOT NULL);
create index xxx_idx on xxx (upper(code));
select * from xxx order by upper(code);
-> ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
(Oracle 9.0.1, Windows 2000)

I know it's quite a long-time that anyone replied this post, but I just need to report our attempts to workaround that.
Dropping function-based indexes in primary database, just before creation of Logical Dataguard hasn't solved our problem, neither dropping indexes in logical database.
In my opinion and after some docs in metalink, I think there's no way to solve it.
Or you drop them or you migrate to 10g.
Regards.

Function-based indexes don't seem to work in Oracle 8.1.5?

Hi,
What gives? What am I doing wrong? I have a table AIRPORT with a column (varchar2(64)) which I have specified a function based index for, but I can't get SQL wueries to use it!!!! the following SQL executes a FULL TABLE SCAN:
select /*+ index (a idx_upper_cityname) */ *
from airport a
where nls_upper(cityName) = 'dfdf'
...as does...
select *
from airport a
where nls_upper(cityName) = 'dfdf'
Table and index code is as follows:
CREATE TABLE airport
id NUMBER NOT NULL,
citycode VARCHAR2(3) NOT NULL,
cityname VARCHAR2(64) NOT NULL,
state VARCHAR2(2),
country VARCHAR2(2) NOT NULL,
region CHAR(1),
airportcode VARCHAR2(3) NOT NULL,
airportname VARCHAR2(64),
code VARCHAR2(4)
drop index idx_upper_cityname
CREATE INDEX idx_upper_cityname ON airport nls_upper(substr(cityName, 0, 64) )
Environment is as follows:
Oracle8i v8.1.5 running on WinNT v4.0 (SP 5)
Client is running on the same machine
thanks in advance,
Alexander

New data point: when I set the handler in my logging.properties file thusly,
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[info-dev].[/infoisland].level = ALL
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[info-dev].[/infoisland].handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandlerI get 0 bytes in the info-dev log (which used to have the aforementioned expception in it). Where is my console going?

Query not considering function based index in oracle 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for