Query on Grouping Tax Base Balances for Italian Report Customer/Vendor List

Hello Experts,
We are implementing the new italian report for customer/vendor List as per Note : 1090857 - Customer/Vendor List for Italy:New Legal Requirement (2007)
This requires a customizing in Table/View V_T007K(Group Tax Base Balances) where we need to group the tax codes.
Based on what logic is this table required to be maintained and what considerations need to be taken care of when mainting the tax codes for each column.
Anyone who has maintained this table or who is ware of the procedure and logic of maintainance , could kindly advise on the same.
Points would be awarded for any helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajeshwari

Hello,
Thanks for your answer,
On what basis should the grouping be done.
Is it only based on the tax codes types?
or is there any specific rule.
has anyone maintained this grouping for a Italian company code before?
Points would be awarded immediately for any help in this.
Thanks & Warm Regards,
Rajeshwari

Similar Messages

Error while uploading .xml file for Customer/Vendor List for Italy

Hi All,
We are facing problem while uploading the .xml file in DMEE transaction for the new Customer/Vendor List for Italy.
We have followed the entire process given in the OSS Note(1090857).
We have SAP 4.6c and followed the below steps:
1. Created ID-FI-IT Development class
2. Added domains
3. Added Data elements
4. Tried to upload the given .xml file and got any error saying ".xml file could not be interpreted".
Also there is a .SAR file mentioned to upload if we receive any errors while uploading .xml file.
Tried uploading the .SAR file also. STill we are recieving the same Error.
Can any one of you help us out.
Thanks in Advance.
Ramesh

Ok, we upload .SAR file in this way:
1. unpack .SAR file with SAPCAR.EXE program. Yuo obtain 2 files
R492445.P9C and K492445.P9C
2. put K492445.P9C in directory \SAPMNT\TRANS\COFILES and put R492445.P9C in directory \SAPMNT\TRANS\DATA of your system (DEV, TST or PRD)
3. Use Tx STMS. If You want create DMEE tree in DEV system, go to DEV import queue. Choose menu Extras | Other requests | Add. Insert P9CK492445 in Transp. request field.
4. Import the request. This creates the DMEE tree. You don't need ti upload XML file after. You can see the DMEE tree created with Tx DMEE and inserting
Tree type UMS1
Format tree IT_CUST_VEN_LIST
5. after continue follow the note
I hope this help you
Roberto

Error 'No tax code found for difference' in Posting Vendor Invoice IDOC

Hi All,
I am getting error message 'No tax code found for difference' while posting Vendor Invoice IDOC into SAP. IDOC type is INVOIC02. There is no difference in PO price, Invoice price and even Standard price. then why this error message? Other Vendor EDI settings are done ( OBCA, OBCD, OBCE etc). Is there any thing specific to be done in the config for this error?
IDOC has PO as reference document.
I looked into several threads in SDN forum but could not find proper solution
Can any ine help me with this issue?
Thanks in advance
Hari

Hi
You might be missing the tax code for uploding through IDOC
so you can use the t.code we02 and give the doc and find the error
go to the WE19 to edit the tax code
and USE the t.code BD87 to select the doc and process it
thanks
Madhu

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Missing Beginning/Ending balances for Italian company on RFSSLD00

We are using report RFSUMB00 ( TA F_IT_01) for the hard closing procedure for our Italian company.
The process is known and working properly.
Now we have been requested for reporting beginning and ending balances for past fiscal years using report RFSSLD00. Due to hard closing procedure there are no beginning and ending balances visible on this report. As workaround we have provided the requested figures using reports RFBILA00 (beginning and ending) and RFSSLD00 (debit and credit) except periods 13 to 16 which have been used for hard closing process.
Are there any other solution for this Italian reporting problem of RFSSLD00?

Hard to tell really.If I were trying to trouble shoot this myself, my hunch would be that is a calculation order problem i.e. the second part of your calc is being calculated at the same time as the first part. Check your application log to see how many passes are being made. Generally, essbase will show a "Calculating ..." type message for each pass detailing what is being calculated.If this shows that these items are being calc'd at the same time, you could try putting the ending inv part of the calc into a second fix statement (even though both fixes are the same) to force the sequence of the calc.Hope this helps.

How to get Opening Balance for Stock Report in Crystal Report?

Dear Experts,
I am using SAP B1 8.82.
I am new to crystal report and now trying to do a monthly stock report with the following format:
Species BatchNum OpeningBal QtyInKD QtyInRD QtyInCD Adj ClosingBal
ABC T1234 17.43 10.16 17.43 0.00 0.00 10.16
ClosingBal = OpeningBal + QtyInKD - QtyInRD - QtyInCD + Adj
Parameters:
- DateFrom
- DateTo
- WarehouseFrom
- WarehouseTo
I am having problem in defining formula to get the opening balance for each item. The report is grouped by species, whscode & batchNum.
Anyone please share with me how to write the formula for opening balance in stock report.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Leng

Hi
Check the below discussion it may helps you
Opening Stock Batchwise
With Regards
Balaji Sampath

TCode for vendor trial balance (and not profit centerwise vendors list)

Hi
I want vendor's trial balance report.
My requirement is that i want list of vendors with the balances with debits and credits separately.
There should be four columns like:
Vendors, Debit (Amt), Credit (Amt), Net.
I checked SDN websites also. There were many posts but all were suggesting only one report i.e. report which is used for getting profit centerwise vendors.

HIiiiii...............
Greeting for the Day...........
Pls check this report S_ALR_87012082 - Vendor Balances in Local Currency
i thing it's help full
Thanks & regard's
Sachin Indulkar

Customer/ Vendor list for Italy (RFIDITCVL)

Dear all,
Does anyone has an idea about the new modification requirements for the report RFIDITCVL?This tax report needs to be changed according to the Italian tax authorities till October 2011 but there is no SAP note for it yet. Please let me know if you have detailed information in German or English.
Many thanks and best regards,
Suzan

Hi All,
We have 4 new issues in SAP OSS note for Spesometro:
1720741
1724947
1663480
1729455
In the next days we will have new OSS note to define the new modifies to the report.
In this time have you some suggestion about a new implementation of Spesometro for my customer that have 4.7 release SP 29 ; someone think that is better upgrade the support package 38 then what you suggest?
Best Regards

Issue on migration of tax depreciation balances for group assets

Dear Experts,
My client is using group assets for tax depreciation report India.
The SAP implementation was done in 2006 during the data migration the
client was not clear of the values both individual asset wise and
group asset wise to migrate to tax depreciation area. So the tax
depreciation for some of the assets are migrated with some
(non caluclated) value.
Now the client want to see the tax depreciation group asset wise or if
possible individual asset wise.For this the group asset need to be
created and assigned to each individual asset in the asset master
record.
The fiscal year variant is v3, april to march with 4 quaters June,
Sep, Dec, Mar.
Now when the data migration for the current year come into picture
I can use AS81/AS82 for loading current year opening balance and
accumulated depreciation for all the group of assets as a whole. Or
I can use AS91/AS92 to load balances into tax depreciation of
each asset individually. But I am not sure whether this is correct.
And also what to do with the previous years balances. I am very
confused. Somebody suggest good solution.
When I create a legacy asset or group asset in AS91 and AS81
respectively the fields in the Takeover values screen are grayed
out and do not allow mw to input values. But I am able to enter
values by clicking the button Transactions in the Takeover values
screen and able to enter a value date , transacton type and amount
for tax depreciation area. Here again I am not convinced using 100
transaction type for current year opening balance. I used
transaction type 652(Unplanned tax depreciation on current year
acquisition) for accumulated current year dpereciation upto second
quarter septemeber 2008.
In asset explorer under "Planned values" tab the opening balance
must be visible under Fiscal year start column but it is displayed
under change column as I entered values for tax depreciation area
in AS81 in Transaction screen with asset value date as 01.04.2008
transaction type 100 and amount as xxxxxx and value date 30.09.2008
652 xxxxxxxx.
Need expert guidance on this
Rgds
Komal

Dear Experts,
Your inputs are awaited.
Rgds
Komal

Service tax base amount for calculation : to be changed

Hi
i have and PO order with basic price say for 100 /- on which it is calcuating service tax 12% , e-cess 2% hcess--1 .This is coming thru tax code from the tax procedure and these taxes service/ecess /Hecess is to be posted to sepearte G/L account.This is working fine.
Now my requirement is that i want to calculate service tax on some % of the base price say 70 % of the base price. The % will always be changing .i want to calculate service tax on the 70/- not on 100.
i want that system should post this 100 /- to cost of service but the tax should be on whatever percentage i make .Here this is 12.36 % on 70 not on 100 at the time of invoice posting.
please guide me
regards

Hello Sunny,
discount on services taxes is not in scope of standard SAP CIN.
I just faced same problem with one of our client, I have interacted with SAP and they give me this reply. They are working on this solution
However for 1 qty it is working. for that you do following
create condition called ZSER for example (copy condition from discount condition)
this is used for change calculated call in purchase order.
activate taxes at service level.(thru SPRO--- IMP step)
also check pricing procedure means seq in OMQ3 to have correct calculation
It will only work for one quantity, if qty in po is more than one then it will not work.in bill passing it will calculate tax for all the quantity.
This must be a transportation bill.
Reward points if useful
Regards
Kedar Kulkarni
Message was edited by:
KEDAR KULKARNI

Query to grouping on task priority for each employee

Hi All,
We have following table structure for employee, task & taskallocation.
CREATE TABLE EMP
   (     "EMP_ID" NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
          "FNAME"     NVARCHAR2(50) NOT NULL ENABLE,
          "LNAME"     NVARCHAR2(50) NOT NULL ENABLE
CREATE TABLE TASKS
   (     "TASK_ID" NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
          "TASK_PRIORITY" NVARCHAR2(10) NOT NULL ENABLE
CREATE TABLE TASKSALLOCATION
   (     "TASKALLOCATION_ID" NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
          "EMP_ID" NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
          "TASK_ID" NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL ENABLE
   The data for the same will be as follows
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (1,'XYZ','DFD');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (2,'DFDS','FD');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (3,'FDSF','GFH');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (6,'GFHGF','GFHS');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (4,'GFD','FDG');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (5,'DSFDS','FDSAF');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (7,'GHGY','EWE');
Insert into EMP (EMP_ID,FNAME,LNAME) values (8,'FGRFSAD','SADF');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (1,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (2,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (3,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (4,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (5,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (6,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (7,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (8,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (9,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (10,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (11,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (12,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (13,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (14,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (15,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (16,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (17,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (18,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (19,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (20,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (21,'LOW');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (22,'HIGH');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (23,'MEDIUM');
Insert into TASKS (TASK_ID,TASK_PRIORITY) values (24,'LOW');
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (1,1,1);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (2,2,1);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (3,3,2);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (4,3,3);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (5,4,4);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (6,4,5);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (7,4,6);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (8,4,7);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (9,5,6);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (10,6,8);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (11,7,9);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (12,8,8);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (13,8,10);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (14,8,11);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (15,8,12);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (16,6,13);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (17,5,14);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (18,3,12);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (19,3,13);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (20,2,15);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (21,1,16);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (22,2,17);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (23,1,18);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (24,4,19);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (25,6,20);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (26,5,21);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (27,1,22);
Insert into TASKSALLOCATION (TASKALLOCATION_ID,EMP_ID,TASK_ID) values (28,3,23);
COMMIT;And we are looking count of tasks based grouping on it's priority per employee. Something like this,
Resultset
with
    t as
          select     'XYZ DFD' as EMP_NAME,     3 as HIGH ,     0 as MEDIUM,     1 as LOW FROM dual union all
          select     'DFDS FD'     ,     1     ,     1     ,     1     FROM dual union all
          select     'FDSF GFH'     ,     1     ,     2     ,     2     FROM dual union all
          select     'GFHGF GFHS'     ,     3     ,     1     ,     1     FROM dual union all
          select     'GFD FDG'     ,     0     ,     1     ,     2     FROM dual union all
          select     'DSFDS FDSAF'     ,     1     ,     2     ,     0     FROM dual union all
          select     'GHGY EWE'     ,     0     ,     0     ,     1     FROM dual union all
          select     'FGRFSAD SADF'     ,     1     ,     2     ,     1     FROM dual)Note : We are using Oracle 11.2.0.2.0 version

Hi,
select emp.fname || ' ' || emp.lname EMP_NAME
     , sum(case when tasks.TASK_PRIORITY = 'HIGH' then 1 else 0 end) HIGH
     , sum(case when tasks.TASK_PRIORITY = 'MEDIUM' then 1 else 0 end) MEDIUM
     , sum(case when tasks.TASK_PRIORITY = 'LOW' then 1 else 0 end) LOW
from emp
join TASKSALLOCATION
    on emp.EMP_ID = TASKSALLOCATION.EMP_ID
join TASKS
    on TASKSALLOCATION.TASK_ID = tasks.TASK_ID
group by emp.fname || ' ' || emp.lname
EMP_NAME                   HIGH     MEDIUM        LOW
FGRFSAD SADF                  1          2          1
XYZ DFD                       3          0          1
GHGY EWE                      0          0          1
GFHGF GFHS                    1          2          0
GFD FDG                       3          1          1
DFDS FD                       1          1          1
FDSF GFH                      1          2          2
DSFDS FDSAF                   0          1          2Regards
Martin Preiss

Query on Procurement and Invoice Verification for Purchase Scheme by Vendor

Dears,
This is K.Hari Hara Ganesh.
I have a query.
Scenario
Vendor commits us if the Purchasing Qty is 200 Kgs for a Material, then 10 Kgs will be given Free of Cost. If it is lesser than 200, no free.
Once received, my Stock should be updated for 210 Kgs, wheras I have to pay the Vendor for 200 Kgs.
How this scenario is handled in SAP ?
If anybody can give me Step by Step creation till Configuration, Master Maintenance, PO, GR, Invoice Verification and Payment by explanation or screen shots, it will be helpful for me.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
K.Hari Hara Ganesh

Dear Nisha,
Thank you very much for the immediate response.
You have asked me to create 2 line items.
Still I have some doubts
1. Is it possible to create the same Material as 2 line items, first line with 200 Kgs and the second line with 10 Kgs for the same Material.
2. Also, my Purchase Tolerance is 2 %, which means for the PO Qty 200 Kgs, I should not accept more than 204 Kgs (200 + 4)
3. Since the 10 Kgs is the scheme given by the Vendor, my system should accept 210 Kgs, irrespective of my Purchase Toleranace.
I will be very happy, if I receive the solution for this scenario too.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
K.Hari Hara Ganesh

Remove show/hide group tree at inforview for cystal report

Hi there!
I have 2 copies of Inforview install on 2 computers.
The first one, is my local comp. The display of cyrstal report at dynamic viewer is ok.
However on my second comp. The viewer will default to show the group tree stucture. I have tried to set the configuration at web.config. But it is still displaying the group tree structure.
Anyone could assist me?
Thanks and Regards,
Joni

I have tried disabling the option "Show Preview Panel" (according to a screenshot I found, this option replaced the old "Create Group Tree" option) in Report Options, and that effectively eliminates the content of the group tree, however, the group tree panel still comes up and shows empty until it is hidden using the toolbar.
This is really annoying and I can't find any solution for it on the web. Any ideas anyone?
Thanks,
Joerg.

User Exit or BADI for Material,BOM,Customer,Vendor

Dear All,
I have requirement where if User A changes a Material X .It should go for approval by workflow.
When the Material X is waiting for approval no other User should be able to change the material .It should give him a message
and restrict him from changing the Material.
Is there any User Exit or BADI to restrict him from changing the material. The exit or BADI should be called as soon as the Material is entered in MM02.
I need exit or BADI for BOM, Vendor and Customer also.
Thank you.

Hi,
You can go to Transaction SE80 and check in Function Group MATF. There have been two User Exits which are called during MM02 Transaction execution (via Analysis Transaction SE30) - MATERIAL_FIELD_SELECTION_NEW and MATERIAL_FIELD_SELECTION_COMB.
BAdI called by FM MATERIAL_FIELD_SELECTION_NEW.
Thanks and Regards,
Prabhakar Dharmala

Authorization for Master Data (Customer / Vendor)

Dear All,
I've requirement in Master Data Transaction display (XD03 / XK03), to control the dispaly of data for certain fields based on Authorization. As an example like below...
User X1 to see F1 & F2 data in above master transaction display data
User X2 to see F1 field, but F2 field not authorized...should be displayed as XXX (u2018XXXu2019 u2013 means data exists in database); if data doesn't exits for field F2...then I would like to display as YYY)
Can you please share your thoughts / ideas to implement the above requirement.
Regds,
Ramki.

SAP standard does not provice such function in XD03/XK03.
Yes, you can achieve this function using custom ABAP code but implementing in sap-standard transaction would be challanging because of the restriction on modifying sap-standard code and not having exits at right place where you would need to implement this.
Regards,
Pawan.

Query on Grouping Tax Base Balances for Italian Report Customer/Vendor List

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for