Questions on AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation?
Dear all,
I know the purpose of "The AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report" provides a transactional breakdown of each accrual account with a net balance not equal to zero in a summarized or full transaction details version.
However, I found out that on of the Purchase Order has been done the PO receipt and created an invoice in AP (validate and accounted). But the report still showing PO is 0 and AP is 343,000 in AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation report. I am just wondering what I have done wrong suppose the PO and AP should be equal in that case.
Please advice.
Thanks.
Is there any miscellaneous transactions recorded in error to your accrual accounts,These miscellaneous transactions or transactions unrelated to purchase order receipts may be from Payables.
Similar Messages
-
Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report?
Dear all,
We are using R12.1.3 and doing the reconciliation AP Vs PO Accrual. However, I run the report "Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report" and found that one record is strange, like the PO Accrual balance is something -10,000 and the Account Payable balanced is 0.00.
What does it mean for my case? Please advice.
Thanks in advance.Dear all,
I rerun " Accrual Reconciliation Load Run" program with data range. After that I re-run "Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report" and found that everything is fine now.
I just wondering am I need to run "Accrual Reconciliation Load Run" every month end closing or just run once for up-grade POs?
Please advice.
Thanks. -
R12: How to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date
Hi,
Anybody know how to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date from and GL Date to in R12?
Since we just upgraded from 11.5.10 to 12.1.3 and found we cannot filter those report for specific date. It shown all data included the old data from 8 years ago also.
We need to run the report only for specific date only. Please share with me if anyone know about this.
Thanks.In 12 you can rebuild and run the report for a particular period, but not a single day if that's what's required
-
Deleting old version of Java disabled ability to open AP and PO Accrual Rpt
Hi I am an end-user and we are in the process of testing Oracle Financials, Purchasing, etc in order to upgrade to the latest version of Oracle. My IT group fiddled with my laptop and said I had 2 versions of Java and apparently deleted the old version on my laptop. Ever since then, I have been unable to open/view the 1) AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report and 2) Summary Accrual Reconciliation Report from the Purchasing module of Oracle. I can still view other financial reports that I run ( i.e. Inventory Value Report from Inventory module, Journal Entries Report from GL, Receiving Transactions Register from A/R). I currently have Java 6 update 29 installed but I am still unable to open reports from the Purchasing module.
Can anyone figure out what happened and how do I re-enable the ability to view those Purchasing reports again?Did you substitute the VO or replaced the original VO itself? Check About this Page/Personalize Page to see the VO has modified query or not. If yes, try restarting the server (Apache bounce doesn't work sometimes, complete bounce/restart fixes the issue. I don't know why :-) ).
Thanks
Shree -
Po Accrual Reconciliation report
Hi Sir
Hope you are doing well and good.
I am new to R12 PO. For my client in 11.5.10.2 they have customized Po Accrual Reconciliation report. I came to know that in R11 they use view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP and temporary table used in that view is PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL.
Now we are migrating this report to R12 and the above view was obsolete synonym in R12.
1) After checking thoroughly i came to that temporary table was replaced with CST_AP_PO_RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY in R12. And i am unable to found view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP replacement in R12. Can you please help me in this regard.
2) Using the two new tables:CST_AP_PO_
RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY, can we modify the query to get the same output as like R11
This is very very urgent request.
Best Regards
ManiThis is the forum for the SQL Developer tool. You need to ask your question in an eBusiness suite forum.
-
Replica of Accrual Reconciliation Report
Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement in which I have to make a query which will give an exact replica of what output will be obtained from "Accrual Reconciliation Report" without using temporary table po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all. At the end of the day it should match the report output for the transaction dates passed (i.e. GL date From/To). I made a little query but still the output from my query is not matching to the output what I obtained from the report. Firstly, my question is: Is it possible to have a /make a sql query which will be exact replica of output of the report and if we can achieve this acc to u, what all things/conditions I have to take care while making this sql. I will really appreciate for any kind of help or feedback.
Many Thanks,
Sumir ChawlaHi Nagamohan,
Here is my script, please check and let me know if I missed some conditions:
SELECT RT.TRANSACTION_ID
,(SELECT DISTINCT RH.SEGMENT1
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_NUMBER"
,(SELECT DISTINCT E2.FULL_NAME
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E2
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND RH.PREPARER_ID = E2.EMPLOYEE_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_PREPARER"
,PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE "PO TYPE"
,V.VENDOR_NAME "VENDOR_NAME"
,TO_CHAR(PHA.CREATION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "PO_CREATION_DATE"
,E1.FULL_NAME "PO_BUYER"
,CC.SEGMENT1||'-'||CC.SEGMENT2||'-'||CC.SEGMENT3||'-'||CC.SEGMENT4||'-'||CC.SEGMENT5||'-'||CC.SEGMENT6||'-'||CC.SEGMENT7||'-'||CC.SEGMENT8 "ACCOUNT"
,PHA.SEGMENT1 "PO_NUMBER"
,NULL "RELEASE_NUMBER"
,PLA.LINE_NUM "LINE_NUMBER"
,MSI.SEGMENT2 "ITEM_NUMBER"
,MSI.PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE "UOM"
,MSI.DESCRIPTION "ITEM_DESCRIPTION"
,PLL.QUANTITY
,PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED
,PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED
,RCV.JE_SOURCE_NAME "TRANSACTION_SOURCE"
,'RECEIPT' "DOCUMENT TYPE"
,RSH.RECEIPT_NUM "DOCUMENT NUMBER"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE (YEAR)"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'MON') "DOCUMENT DATE (MONTH)"
,RCV.CURRENCY_CODE "CURRENCY_CODE"
,RT.PO_UNIT_PRICE*NVL(RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE,1) "UNIT_PRICE_(SGD)"
,RT.QUANTITY "TRANSACTION_QUANTITY"
,NVL(RCV.ACCOUNTED_DR,-RCV.ACCOUNTED_CR) "ACCOUNTED_AMOUNT"
,NVL(RCV.ENTERED_DR,-RCV.ENTERED_CR) "ENTERED_AMOUNT"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_DATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_DATE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_TYPE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_TYPE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_RATE"
FROM APPS.RCV_RECEIVING_SUB_LEDGER RCV
,APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS CC
,APPS.RCV_TRANSACTIONS RT
,APPS.PO_HEADERS PHA
,APPS.RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS RSH
,APPS.PO_LINES PLA
,APPS.PO_VENDORS V
,APPS.HR_LOCATIONS HL
,APPS.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS PLL
,APPS.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS MSI
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E1
WHERE RCV.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCV.ACTUAL_FLAG='A'
AND PHA.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE = 'STANDARD'
AND PHA.VENDOR_ID = V.VENDOR_ID
AND PHA.AGENT_ID = E1.EMPLOYEE_ID
AND RCV.RCV_TRANSACTION_ID = RT.TRANSACTION_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PLA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_ID = PLA.PO_LINE_ID
AND PLA.ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND RT.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID = RSH.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_LOCATION_ID = PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID = HL.LOCATION_ID
AND NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) > NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)
AND (NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) - NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)) > 0.01
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID = RSH.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
UNION ALL
SELECT RT.TRANSACTION_ID
,(SELECT DISTINCT RH.SEGMENT1
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_NUMBER"
,(SELECT DISTINCT E2.FULL_NAME
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E2
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND RH.PREPARER_ID = E2.EMPLOYEE_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_PREPARER"
,PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE "PO TYPE"
,V.VENDOR_NAME "VENDOR_NAME"
,TO_CHAR(REL.CREATION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "PO_CREATION_DATE"
,E1.FULL_NAME "PO_BUYER"
,CC.SEGMENT1||'-'||CC.SEGMENT2||'-'||CC.SEGMENT3||'-'||CC.SEGMENT4||'-'||CC.SEGMENT5||'-'||CC.SEGMENT6||'-'||CC.SEGMENT7||'-'||CC.SEGMENT8 "ACCOUNT"
,PHA.SEGMENT1||'-'||REL.RELEASE_NUM "PO_NUMBER"
,REL.RELEASE_NUM "RELEASE_NUMBER"
,PLA.LINE_NUM "LINE_NUMBER"
,MSI.SEGMENT2 "ITEM_NUMBER"
,MSI.PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE "UOM"
,MSI.DESCRIPTION "ITEM_DESCRIPTION"
,PLL.QUANTITY
,PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED
,PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED
,RCV.JE_SOURCE_NAME "TRANSACTION_SOURCE"
,'RECEIPT' "DOCUMENT TYPE"
,RSH.RECEIPT_NUM "DOCUMENT NUMBER"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE (YEAR)"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'MON') "DOCUMENT DATE (MONTH)"
,RCV.CURRENCY_CODE "CURRENCY_CODE"
,RT.PO_UNIT_PRICE*NVL(RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE,1) "UNIT_PRICE_(SGD)"
,RT.QUANTITY "TRANSACTION_QUANTITY"
,NVL(RCV.ACCOUNTED_DR,-RCV.ACCOUNTED_CR) "ACCOUNTED_AMOUNT"
,NVL(RCV.ENTERED_DR,-RCV.ENTERED_CR) "ENTERED_AMOUNT"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_DATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_DATE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_TYPE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_TYPE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_RATE"
FROM APPS.RCV_RECEIVING_SUB_LEDGER RCV
,APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS CC
,APPS.RCV_TRANSACTIONS RT
,APPS.PO_HEADERS PHA
,APPS.RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS RSH
,APPS.PO_LINES PLA
,APPS.PO_RELEASES REL
,APPS.PO_VENDORS V
,APPS.HR_LOCATIONS HL
,APPS.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS PLL
,APPS.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS MSI
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E1
WHERE RCV.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCV.ACTUAL_FLAG='A'
AND PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE = 'BLANKET'
AND REL.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND REL.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND PHA.VENDOR_ID = V.VENDOR_ID
AND REL.AGENT_ID = E1.EMPLOYEE_ID
AND RCV.RCV_TRANSACTION_ID = RT.TRANSACTION_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PLA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_ID = PLA.PO_LINE_ID
AND RT.PO_RELEASE_ID = REL.PO_RELEASE_ID
AND PLA.ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND RT.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID = RSH.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_LOCATION_ID = PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID = HL.LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.PO_RELEASE_ID = REL.PO_RELEASE_ID
AND NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) > NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)
AND (NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) - NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)) > 0.01
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID = RSH.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
ORDER BY TRANSACTION_ID;
Thanks,
Sumir -
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run report performance issue.
we have significant performance issues when running accrual reconciliation load run report. we had to cancel after have it run for a day. any idea on how to resolve it?
We experienced similar issue. As the runtime of this report depends on the input parameters. Remember, your first run of this report going to take significant amount of time and the subsequent runs will be much shorter.
But w had to apply the patches referred in the MOS article to resolve the performance issue.
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run Has Slow Performance [ID 1490578.1]
Thanks,
Sunthar.... -
PO issue (Accrual Reconciliation Report )
Hi,
when run the accrual reconciliation report for PO,I find the quantity *Unit price is not equal Amount when A/P Receipt Match,the details as follows:
when find the original PO line ,find that the PO line's status is cancelled ,the price have changed from 6 to 45 , from 10 to 50 before cancelled this PO lines, how can do now let them equal ?
and check the invoice for this po ,
20081022 1 Bar 20 6 120.00
CH0000059 1 Bar -20 6 (120.00)
20081022 2 Bar 20 10 200.00
CH0000059 2 Bar -20 10 (200.00)
CHSZ-Compart Hi-Precision Tech Accrual Reconciliation Report Report Date: 02-12-2008 20:00
Account: 24.00000.317010.0000.0000.000
PO Number Item+ Transaction Src Org Date Document Number Line Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Variance Balance
Vendor Name: : ShenzhenBaoan
240803218 Pdtn consumables Receive PO CHS 2008-10-29 30509262 1 Bar -20 6 (120.00) (120.00)
Pdtn consumables Return to Supplier PO CHS 2008-11-5 30509262 1 Bar 20 6 120.00 120.00
Pdtn consumables A/P Receipt Match AP CHS 2008-10-29 20081022 1 Bar *20 45 120.00 120.00*
Pdtn consumables A/P Receipt Match AP CHS 2008-11-5 CH0000059 1 Bar -20 45 (900.00) (900.00)
Pdtn consumables Receive PO CHS 2008-10-29 30509262 2 Bar -20 10 (200.00) (200.00)
Pdtn consumables Return to Supplier PO CHS 2008-11-5 30509262 2 Bar 20 10 200.00 200.00
Pdtn consumables A/P Receipt Match AP CHS 2008-10-29 20081022 2 Bar *20* *50* *200.00* *200.00*
Pdtn consumables A/P Receipt Match AP CHS 2008-11-5 CH0000059 2 Bar -20 50 (1,000.00) (1,000.00)
Vendor Subtotal (1,580.00) 0 (1,580.00)
---------------- - --------------- ---------------- GL
Account Subtotal: (67,550.27) 0 (67,550.27) (67,550.27)
Report Total: (67,460.15) -90 (67,550.15)
================ = =============== ================
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:56 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:57 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:58 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:59 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 11:00 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 11:07 PMhave anybody can give advise ?
Edited by: user638343 on Jan 8, 2009 10:24 PM -
Hi All,
I need to understand the concept of accrual reconciliation,
Please let me know a source or plese explain in the forum.
Further let me know if all the PO related trasactions appear in the accrual reconciliation report or only the items where there is a miss match.
Thanks and Regards,
MigaraHi,
Im sorry.Somehow two issues were posted for the same issue.
However I went through the document,but still I its not clear the meaning of this.
As per the document A/P Line Match - A/P invoice matching transaction for which there is a receipt against the same purchase order and purchase order line.
Does this mean a situation something like this.
PO line 1 has a quantity 10 and unit price 10
and received 5 item in one receipt (receipt 01) and received 5 items in another receipt (receipt 02)
Then the invoice is matched to the receipt 02.
Please let me knw.
Thanks and Regards,
MPH
Edited by: user11337190 on 17-Nov-2010 15:16 -
Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report/Accrual Reconciliation Report
Hi Experts,
It is well-known that Accrual Reconciliation Report shows out the data from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all i.e. only that data which resides in po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all table will be picked and showed on the report based on net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity (i.e. depends on the tolerance levels given). But if I want to show the data from backend thru query, i will use this table and give my conditions for net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity. As mentioned in Note:433683.1 in Metalink, it is mentioned that:
The following two columns in the PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL table
determines whether a Transaction appears on the Accrual Reconciliation
Report.
Net_po_line_quantity
Net_po_line_amount
For a Transaction not to appear on the Accrual Reconciliation Report
net transaction quantity AND the net transaction amount for each PO Line must be
less than or equal to the values entered in the tolerance parameters (or <= 0,
which is the default value).
This means I will make my query which should match with the report data:
select * from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all
where net_po_line_amount>0 and net_po_line_quanity>0;
But I have seen some cases where both these are zero and still shown on the report, i have seen few more cases where these are null and still shown on the report. May be we need to add more conditions or somewhere I am doing wrong! Please suggest what all conditions we should consider while incorporating with this type of requirement.
Any suggestions on this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Sumir ChawlaHi,
Pleaser refer the below documentation ...
Accrual Reconciliation Report Errored Out With APP-FND-01564: ORACLE error 942 in FDFGDF [ID 1440284.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha -
URGENT: Grouping in Accrual Reconciliation Report
Hello
Could anyone please explain how grouping is done in the 'Accrual Reconciliation Report' - POXACREC ? How does the group - G_item_vendor work? Is grouping being done here?
My requirement is to customize this report by the logic that : If item number is null, grouping should be done by Description. If anyone has any suggestions, please do reply.
I am working on Oracle Applications version : 11.5.10.2Hi Anju,
I suggest you to post this query on "oracle applications forum".
Still I have an idea, you can give a try:
Why can't you group on item||Description {concatenating both fields} field. Use this field just for group and use the individual fields for display and other purposes.
Br,
Gouri Sankar -
Accrual Reconciliation Rebuil - No Report --- problem
Hi friends
i need to run Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild. but i find the report as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report. I've run this earlier as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild. why is it showing as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report? moreover, there is an extra parameter p_op_unit_coa_id is shown in the parameter form. whenever i try to submit the report it says
APP-FND-01404: An invalid style, LANDWIDE240, is specified.
Cause: AOL cannot find a record for the print style LANDWIDE240
Action: Check that the print style LANDWIDE240 is a valid style and that a record exists in FND_PRINTER_STYLESPls help me.
Thanks
Lisancheck this forum thread :
Accrual Reconcilliation Report
/S.P DASH -
Excluded transactions on the Accrual Reconciliation report
Does anyone know how to investigate a non-zero total in the "Excluded TXN" column on the Accrual Reconciliation report? How can we find out what this means?
I guess you are passing in the quantity and amount tolerances. The logic is:
If you have any outstanding amount or quantity in the PO (net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity in the po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all after you rebuild) and if you are passing in the tolerances to the rebuild report, this excluded transactions will show up.
Say you have po line has qty of 2 and price $44. You have received 2 but billed only 1. You have not yet written this quantity 1 off.
When you run the accrual rebuild you will get the net_po_line_amount as -44 and and net_po_line_quantity as -1 (since you have accrued (more credits) then invioced (less debits)).
Nowif since have not written off this po line, and if you pass amount tolerance as 5 and quantity tolerance as 2 then this $44 shows as excluded (since you told the report to take tolerances into account).
here is the query:
SELECT par.po_header_id,po_line_id,line_location_id,net_po_line_amount,net_po_line_quantity,transaction_amount,par.org_id,poh.segment1
ROUND ( (DECODE (par.write_off_flag
, 'Y', 0
, DECODE ('N'
, 'Y', 0
, 'N', DECODE (SIGN (ABS (par.net_po_line_amount) - 45)
, 1, 0
, DECODE (SIGN ( ABS (ROUND (par.net_po_line_quantity, 4))
- 2
, 1, 0
, par.transaction_amount
/ 4
* 4 zero_bal_total
FROM po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all par
, po_lookup_codes plu
, org_organization_definitions ood
, mtl_system_items msi
,po_headers_all poh
WHERE ood.organization_id = par.transaction_organization_id
AND plu.lookup_type = 'ACCRUAL TRX SOURCE'
AND plu.lookup_code = par.transaction_source_code
AND msi.organization_id=&your master org_Id
AND msi.inventory_item_id (+) = par.inventory_item_id
and net_po_line_amount <>0
and poh.po_header_Id=par.po_header_Id
HTH.
Thanks
Nagamohan -
Accrual Reconciliation 11i VS R12
Dear Experts,
If any one has idea about difference between "11i & R12 Accrual Reconciliation" Process please explain me
Thanks
Bharath983186 wrote:
Dear Experts,
If any one has idea about difference between "11i & R12 Accrual Reconciliation" Process please explain me
Thanks
BharathPlease see RCD docs.
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Release+AND+Content+AND+Document&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=RCD&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein -
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run accoutning data
Hi,
Can anyone let me know from which table the Accrual Reconciliation Load Run picks up the acocunting CCIDs?
Thanks and Regards,
MPHWe experienced similar issue. As the runtime of this report depends on the input parameters. Remember, your first run of this report going to take significant amount of time and the subsequent runs will be much shorter.
But w had to apply the patches referred in the MOS article to resolve the performance issue.
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run Has Slow Performance [ID 1490578.1]
Thanks,
Sunthar....
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I am trying to assign the GOS service for the Z transaction using a ehancment spot in PBO . Problem is I am getting the GOS service enabled for the transaction. But when I click on "View Attachment list" service, it is given short dump in ECC6 wh
-
ScrollPanes & TextAreas - Repositioning in 1.5 with .scrollRectToVisible()
So I've an uneditable text area with the words wrapping around sitting inside a scroll pane. My user clicks a button and the program fetches some text from an XML document and displays it on the screen. The trouble is that the window automatically sc
-
Mail Badge Not Appearing - Please help
Hi, I have a Gmail account, and the iPhone set to fetch every 15 minutes. When I receive an e-mail, the phone vibrates or rings to indicate mail received, but no badge # appears on the Mail icon the iPhone's desktop. Is this normal? Thanks1
-
Rownum and order by as parameter
i want a procedure that will accept the 'from' and 'to' parameter (rownum) for paginaton as well as the order by column also as a parameter( the order by changes based on the parameter) , and my query is using multiple table which doesnt have Unique
-
Regarding deletion of objects under one package
Hi All, I have an obselete Z package under which there are more than 15 objects( 10 tables, views, FM). Please suggest is there any method in which i can delete all objects in one go. Thanks, Shobhit