R/3 Systems with Different Dialogues

R/3(IDOC) to XI to Vendors
If my R/3 System is at Japan, XI and Vendors are in US . Whether the IDOC Adapter between the R/3 and XI is cabable of translating the information that is present in the two different systems?

Rohini,
Generally, if your systems are in different geographies, each geography will be having their own systems and landscapes. This is in many cases..
If you are combining this, then you should go for one Global SLD, where all systems are residing and making use of this from any geography...
And there are many other factors like data harmonization/consolidation etc will come into picture, i think that is different ..not required here
Regards,
Moorthy
Regards,
Moorthy

Similar Messages

Connect to R/3 systems with different XI systems

Hi all,
I have the next scenario:
R/3 system A --> XI system A --> Other systems
R/3 system B --> XI system B --> Other systems
Both systems have different SLD system.
And I need create an IDOC interface between both R/3 systems.
Could somebody help me?
Can I send and IDOC to a XI system with only configure a RFC connection (SM59) or I need configure it in SLD?
Regards, Raú

Hey
are u suppose to do an IDOC(R/3 system A)-Xi-IDOC(R/3 system B) scenario,of u have to collect IDOC's from both the R/3 systems and send it to a single file?
in any case u have to maintain separate Business system and logical system name for both R/3 systems
thanx
ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad

WF-BATCH on different systems with different email adresses and also CUA

We have several SAP systems (1x ERP, 3x IS-U, 1x CRM, 1x HR, 1x SRM, etc.) and we have a CUA system for the administration of all users on these SAP systems. On the seperate SAP systems we have workflows active which all use user(s) WF-BATCH.
Now, we have the problem that emails are sent from the workflows by the WF-BATCH user(s). But on the HR system we want to sent the mail using HR @ company.com and from the ERP system we want to sent the mail using ERP @ company.com and from the IS-U system ISU1 @ company.com, etc.etc.
But all users are maintained from the CUA so we have 1 WF-BATCH user in CUA. The emailadress is also maintained in the CUA (so changing WF-BATCH in the different SAP system with SU01 is no option).
Does anyone have any experience with this and do you have tips how to solve this?

I had a previous similar experience and I had to go and change the user in every system (although the client had CUA). In my case, I actually had to create WF-BATCH manually in every single system.

XI 2.0: HowTo connect Bus.-Systems with different Releases to XI (RFC-Ad.)

Hi,
can anybody help me solving this problem:
I have Business-Systems connected to XI by RFC-Adapter. Everything works fine. Now I want to upgrade some of these Business-Systems to a newer Release --> RFCs are changing! (For both Releases I have separate Developing-Systems)
Does the following work?
- Creating a new Product-Version
- Creating new Software-Component-Versions for the new Product-Version
- Creating Namespaces with the same names (as in the older Software-Component-Versions)
- Tools/Release-Takeover for every Software-Component
- Connecting Develop-System of the new Release to the new Software-Components (Interface-Import of RFCs)--> in the new Software-Components only new RFCs can be uploaded.
- Business-Systems with old Release keep connected with old Product-Version. Business-Systems with new Release are connected with new Product-Version.
Does it work? Is this the best approach or are there other possibilities?
Thanks in advance,
Max.

Hey
are u suppose to do an IDOC(R/3 system A)-Xi-IDOC(R/3 system B) scenario,of u have to collect IDOC's from both the R/3 systems and send it to a single file?
in any case u have to maintain separate Business system and logical system name for both R/3 systems
thanx
ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad

Can I copy between systems with different R/3 releases/add-ons?

hi,all
help me!

Notes 19574 and 24853 provide basic information about this. The main or basic release must always be identical. Support Packages and add-ons should also have the same status in both systems. Only then can the consistency of the data be guaranteed.
For instance, if an add-on is only installed in the source system, the remote copy will terminate with a reference to differences in the dictionary or missing tables in the analysis phase, and will not make the copy. The remote copy terminates if not all data can be copied, in other words if, for instance, a field is missing in the target system, a field is too small or a complete table is missing. You can include individual tables and, from Release WAS 6.10, also development packages (formerly development classes) in the source system in an exception list, to avoid the termination. See note 557132 for further information.
The export does not experience this problem with the transport because the target system is not checked during the export. On the other hand, differences in the dictionary or missing tables are subsequently reported as errors during the import but this does not result in any termination. All of the data that can be imported is imported. In this respect, different ADD-ONs would not pose a problem for the client transport. to what extent is the data consistent or useable?

DB Copy (MSSQL) between two SAP systems with different level and Components

Hi,
we have a SAP system release mysap 2004 SR1 and for "the upgrade project to SAP ECC 6.0 " we installed a new mysap 2004 in a new hardware (sap03) where we have also solution manager running. The new installed Mysap 2004 SR1 is alos running fine in the new hardware.
Now we would like to do DB copy from the old system (sap02) to the the new system sap03 and then we will do the upgrade to SAP ECC 6.0.
After I compared the two systems I have following questions:
1) there are 4 Software Components which are not in the new system (sap03). This are:
PI
FIN_BLERP
BP_INSTRASS
Is this necesary for the DB copy or we do not need this to be able to do the DB copy?
2) The Software Components Level is not the same. Should we have the same level to do the DB Copy?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
HanseAtik

Hi Juan, hi Clas,
just to be clear and to not stuck on the the way:
The systems are as follow:
1) the source system:
                     - Windows Server 2003,
                     - MSSQL Server 2005 with 32 bit.
                     - Mysap 2004 SR1
2) Target system:
                   - Windows Server 2003
                   - MSSQL Server 2005, with 64 bit.
                   - Mysap 2004 SR1 (with less Support package level and no PI, FIN_Basis, BP_BLERP and BP_INTASS coponents)
I hope this will work. could you post the link the DB Copy guide we are talking about?
By this way we will be sure that we are talking about the same DB Copy. Otherwise any mistake in this step will cost more work and time.
Thanks in advance
Best regards
HanseAtik

How do I use firesync for the first time across 3 systems with different bookmarks? How do I combine initially?

If I have a need for firesync, it stands to reason that I have previously been using 2 systems. So my first step is to combine the 2 firefox profiles, but I do not see documentation for this

Duplicated.
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/853267

Can i do client export import between systems with different patch levels

we want to do a client export import between two systems. As I understand the patch levels should be the same in both for this to happen..
But right now I am in a situation where time is a big constrant. The basis patch level is on par. But the rest are not. Can I do client import successfully at this stage.

The only thing that may stop it working could be additional functionality between the systems.
I work on XI and there is a huge difference between SP12 and SP15. We were able to do the transports between systems, but as Dev was patched before QA, and the transport was reliant on standard settings not being available, it still went though, but we had to transport it again after applying SP15 to QA.
Again, it probably depends on what System you have running on Netweaver...

Same SKU with different names in 2 systems

Hello All,
I am wokring on a SNP scenario. We have a finished sku A and its sub component sku C.
A (FERT) ---> C (RM)
We have forecast on sku A and want to find dependent demand in sku C thru SNP
Forecast A -
> Find Dependent Demand C
sku A maintained in ERP1 R/3 system as FERT
sku C maintained in ERP 1 R/3 system with different name sku B as Raw material
sku C maintained in ERP2 R/3 system as FERT
Now product A is maintained in one R/3 system and product C is in another R/3 system. Both these R/3 systems are connected to APO and both these materials are also in APO now.
After heuristic planning in SNP, we want to pass the dependent demand to ERP2 system as Sales Order.
My concern is if sku C has different name in 2 systems, how should I pass the demand to other system?
Please advice.
Thanks,
Sanju
Message was edited by:
Sanju

Maybe you can create SKU D in APO (and R3) which is lined through PPMs or PDS to SKU B from ERP1 and SKU C from ERP2 and aggregate the dependent demand generated during Heuristics to SKU D
then you can only transfer only SKU D to ERP2? Am not sure how important it is for you to hav the link between SKU D and SKU c in ERP2
Alternately
Dont transfer SKU C from ERP2 to APO. Only create Dependent demand for SKU C from ERP1 and transfer it to ERP2. You can run MRP again in ERP1 for the aggregated requirement (unless you want some APO specific functionality, the result must be close to what you will get in APO)

Help: Windows cannot restore a system image to a computer with different firmware

I want to recover a complete image of a Windows 7 operating system I have backed up to my other server. But I am getting the error "Windows cannot restore a system image to a computer with different firmware. The System Image was created by a computer using BIOS and this computer is using EFI"
The image was definitely taken from this machine - the firmware has not changed!
What do I need to do to restore the image?
Background Story ..
I bought a new HP 255 laptop per-installed with Windows 7 without Operating Systems instal disks (I will NEVER be stupid enough to do that again!).
I took a complete image of the systems, as suggested so that I was well backed up.
However, my machine corrupted its operating systems with a few weeks. The boot recovery CD did not work (would not boot). So in desperation, and because time was short I went out and bought another, legitimate copy of Windows 7 DVD with a license key (So now I have 2, legitimate copies of the operating system!).
I installed the new copy of Windows 7 - but it was dreadful, because many drivers were missing. Mostly the missing drivers were not available on the HP support site for this machine. ALso, boot up was increadibly slow compared to the original OS installation.
So I created a new boot recovery disk from the new version of Windows, and tried to restore using that. New boot disk loads ok, I can find the old image on my network (after loading a few network drivers). But I won't instal the image - giving the above error message.
I tried deleting the EFI partition from the disk (using GPARTED to reformat that partition). That killed the Windows 7 on the machine - but still gives the same error message when I try to re-image the machine.
I have tried going into the BIOS settings .. HP 255 has a "Legacy Mode" - which I have enabled, but this makes no difference at all!
I think that the kind of solutions I am looking for might be:
1. There is a clever way of disabling EFI on my 255 so that it looks like a legacy BIOS machine, or
2. This EFI this is wired into my new boot recovery disk - and there is a way of creating a boot recovery disk that does not use EFI
This has taken me about 2 weeks so far,please help with any suggestions!

DonOxley wrote:
Erico,
I suspect that "MSDOS" is what the Gparted tool calls "MBR" for a partition table, as explained here:
http://superuser.com/questions/700770/mbr-equals-msdos-for-gparted
I think that you are suggesting I give up on trying to recover the image I have stored on my server and just to instal Windows 7 from my new copy. There are two problems with this.
1. After having systematically downloaded all of the drivers from the HP 255 notebook support page, I am still seeing missing drivers listed. Install the AMD graphics softpaq driver first. It also contains the chipset drivers.
2. The machine is taking a hugely long time to boot up, and seems much slower with this version. Maybe that is a product of using "EFI" rather than "bios" - I don't know.
My assumption is that HP had some special set-up option with their version of Windows which makes the machine more performant. It does not seem to be a coincidence that the image they deliver the machine with is not quite compatible with a 'normal' Windows 7 instal.
So my original question stands: How do I recover the image that I saved away (as per instructed) when I first bough the machine?
You still have not said what you used to create the system image. What is the "image" file's extension?
You are mistaken in your comparison. MSDOS is an operating sytem MBR is a partitioning scheme. that is comparing apples to oranges.
The article is making an oblique reference in that using GPARTED is more or less equated to using the diskpart utility at the command line. Everything done at the comand line is essentially done by use of MSDOS commands. GPARTED does the same thing with LINUX commands via a graphical interface so you don't have to type in the commands in a Linux console.
Do you mean making a backup? a backup is not a clone which can be reproduced on different hardware. The SSD disk replacement does make the hardware differ from the original configuration.
Follow the instaructions on the following tutorial to make your disk a GPT type before installing.
http://www.disk-partition.com/articles/mbr-partition-table-to-gpt.html
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

HELP!! Authorization in the same laptop with different operation systems

My BF installed Win 7 operation system on his laptop yesterday and re-authorized it when he used iTunes. However, when he finished authorization, a dialog block showing that "*Including this one, you have authorised two computers out of your available 5*" appeared; what's worse, when he connected his iPhone to the laptop, it deleted all the bought apps in the iPhone, instead of synchronizating.
I also want to install Win 7 operation system, but I'm afraid that the same thing would happen again (to my iTouch).
We're quite confused that why the authorization in the same laptop with different operation systems is counted as two times. Friends who know please tell us whether this is the case.. If not, please tell us how to deal with it as we frequently re-install operation system for quicker operation.
Message was edited by: Shiwen
Message was edited by: Shiwen

It's the *operating system* that is authorised, not the particular user profile or the hardware. Before upgrading/reinstalling deauthorise and you won't run out...
tt2

Btrfs with different file systems for different mount points?

Hey,
I finally bought a SSD, and I want to format it to f2fs (and fat to boot on UEFI) and install Arch on it, and in my old HDD I intend to have /home and /var and try btrfs on them, but I saw in Arch wiki that btrfs "Cannot use different file systems for different mount points.", it means I cannot have a / in f2fs and a /home in btrfs? What can I do? Better use XFS, ZFS or ext4 (I want the faster one)?
Thanks in advance and sorry my english.

pedrofleck wrote:Gosh, what was I thinking, thank you! (I still have a doubt: is btrfs the best option?)
Just a few weeks ago many of us were worrying about massive data loss due to a bug introduced in kernel 3.17 that caused corruption when using snapshots. Because btrfs is under heavy developement, this sort of thing can be expected. That said, I have my entire system running with btrfs. I have 4 volumes, two raid1, a raid0 and a jbod. I also run rsync to an ext4 partition and ntfs. Furthermore I make offline backups as well.
If you use btrfs make sure you have backups and make sure you are ready to use them. Also, make sure you check sum your backups. rsync has the option to use checksums in place of access times to determine what to sync.

BEx Integration with different source systems

Hi All
I know we can create BEx querys on top of an infoprovider. But instead of storing data into BW and creating reports using BEx tools can we integrate BEx with the other source systems. Like Business Objects tool which can be integrated with different sources. My client wants to know whether we can integrate with BEx for the following
Support data source -- SAP BW
Support data source -- Oracle
Support data source -- MS SQL Server
Support data source -- MS Access
Support data source -- MS Excel
Support data source -- ASCII Text files
Support data source -- XML/XSD
Support data source -- Web Services
Support data source -- SAP R/3
Support data source -- BO Universe
Thanks for letting me know your opinions

Hi,
in theory you can. You will still have a virtual provider on top of your Infosource which will be connected to your datasource; thus you'll have to create the structures; you'll have to load master data as well... so not so nice solution if you think that at this stage, the storage will be the less of your costs....
How are you going to deal with R/3 data?? I mean a great advantage of BW is really when you have an R/3 behind...
I'd rather consolidate all these disparate datasources using the Visual compsoer which can get this data out of nearly an datasource and merge them in one single report; in theory again you could implement all BEx functionalities but at which cost and effort??
Weird that a customer is asking such a question because it is usually the other way around: use SAP BW data in another front-end... by the way SAP is going to acquire BO soon....
hope this helps...
Olivier.

IPop Use with different operating systems Windows And Mac Osx

so the quetion is this can i use my IPod with different Operatin systems?
I have a MacBook at home where i keep all my Music in and at the office i have a Windows network i would like to carry some music from home to the office using my IPod. I thought that a solution is to Partition my Ipod 40G in 2 parts and have one of them FAT so that my Windows operating system can view it.
Did any of you done it? and if so How? did you loose the use of some of the IPod functions?
let me Know if there are ways to carry music using your Ipod from the MacOSX to Windows Prof or home edition thanks!
Donatello

Your problem has nothing to do with data vs music. Music IS data. I've used my iPod for data and music since the first iPod was released. There's no reason to think the two OS versions are involved either.
Look at your usage practices - and I'm not necessarily suggesting you are abusing your computer. Has one of your computers crashed while the iPod was connected? This could cause data damage that might explain the problem. Have you ever disconnected the iPod without un-mounting it first?
You might also be creating fragmentation problems if you frequently add and remove data files while at the same time adding and removing music. One decision I made when I was using my iPod to transport lots of movies and photos for a project was to NOT make any music changes during that busy two week period.

Distributed File System Replication between servers with different performance

If Distributed File System Replication is set between servers with different performance. What will happen with the performance of the fastest server? Will the performance decrease to match the performance of the
slowest server in the chain? I mean, will the source slow down (processor speed) if the recipients can't keep up?

Hi,
If you mix different performance server for DFS replication, most of improvements on the fastest server are disabled for backwards compatibility and the performance decrease to match the performance of the slowest server.
For more detailed information, please refer to the article below:
Tuning replication performance in DFSR (especially on Win2008 R2)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2010/03/31/tuning-replication-performance-in-dfsr-especially-on-win2008-r2.aspx
Best Regards,
Mandy
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here .
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

R/3 Systems with Different Dialogues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for