Realms with different top-level domain

I'm testing OCS 10.1.2 and I am interested in setting up multiple realms.
Must all realms be in the same top-level domain? I see in the examples (like in Note Note:317434.1) names like this:
- Default realm created at install:
dc=us,dc=oracle,dc=com
- Additional realms created by the administrator post-install:
dc=uk,dc=oracle,dc=com
dc=ca,dc=oracle,dc=com
A more typical example for what we need would be:
dc=company,dc=co,dc=uk
dc=company,dc=no
dc=company,dc=de
Is this possible?

What are the consequence of that? Any practical problems?
I see in Note 308682.1 that the top level of a top level domain is NULL. So maybe instead of world you can use an empty top level domain.
However, this document refers to mail and not OID.

Similar Messages

Email address with new top level domain (TLD)

Hi all,
Apple does not recognise the new top level domains. My company has a new domain e.g. aaa.systems and os x says that the email [email protected] is not valid!
Please help.

This will work partly. But the mail address will still be [email protected] and gives an issue with the outgoing mail server.

Clean and Pristine AD Migration with same top level domain, possible?

We had planned on doing a C&P migration of a domain with the initial assumption that the TLD was .local.
Turns out it is .com, is it still possible to do C&P?
TLD is company.com, no sub domain.
We want xxxxxxx.company.com as the AD sub domain. From everything I read C&P requires a different TLD or can it work so long as we use a sub domain? Eventually the old server will go away.
Going from 2003 64 Bit to 2012 R2 as far as schema.

Yes you can.
But
If you have xyz.com now and you want sub.xyz.com and you create this as a child domain then the old xyz.com will always be around. You can create sub.xyz.com as a different forest and migrate off of xyz.com if you want.
If you're going from 2003 to 2012 you'll need to wait for the newest version of ADMT to be released. Right now 3.2 does not support 2012. You can create the new domain as 2008 R2 and then raise it to 2012 after your migration if you need to start
soonest.
If it answered your question, remember to “Mark as Answer”.
If you found this post helpful, please “Vote as Helpful”.
Postings are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Active Directory: Ultimate Reading Collection

Block Top Level Domain (.eu)

I'm trying to configure a transport rule in Exchange 2013 to block all emails from the TLD .eu We get nothing but a TON of spam that is not caught by the Exchange 2013 spam filter, and it's always from a different domain. I have seen guides for
2007 and 2010, but nothing for 2013.
Do I just use the rule "The sender domain is" and use the value ".eu"? I just want to verify this is the correct way to block a TLD.

Hi Jsilveri,
You can use Sender Filtering feature:
Set-SenderFilterConfig –BlockedDomains
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124087(v=exchg.150).aspx
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support
That is the same answer as before. The domain changes with each spam message. I need to block anything coming from a .EU top level domain. So domain1.eu , domain2.eu should all be blocked with 1 rule.

How to stop location bar autocomplete from using top-level domains?

I love the location bar autocomplete - or at least, I used to. I had it trained to the point where typing one letter was enough to bring up the pages I used most often. But now with Firefox 12, it ignores all that and favors top-level domains.
For instance: I haven't been to the front page of YouTube in years; there's no reason to go there. When I would type "www.y" into the location bar, it would pop up to the one video I visited most often - and that's exactly what I WANTED it to do. Now it defaults to "YouTube.com" and I have to scroll down to find the actual page I want. Same deal with Wikipedia: I don't want to go to the front page, I want to go to the page I use most often for research.
So basically, what do I need to change to get the location bar autocomplete to stop giving me top-level domains I don't want, and go back to giving me the subpages I spent years training it to favor? Scrolling down to the right entry is a waste of time when typing one letter and hitting enter should be enough to do it...

And I meant the actual location bar, not the dropdown menu below it. The dropdown is fine: it's the autocomplete '''in''' the location bar that needs to be fixed...

How to connect top level domain database to subdomains

Created subdomains for the top level domains. Need to learn
how can we connect centralized database in the top level domain
with the subdomains code in coldfusion.

If you're using EOP and your goal is to block stuff coming from a certain geographic area then you need to go to your exchange admin center select Protection>content filter>Default Policy>International Spam>Filter email messages sent from the
following countries or regions

How to block top-level domain names in rules for EOP?

Using EOP for email filtering to/from our on-premise Exchange server. How do I block entire top-level domains in the rules section under mail flow? For example, w need everything ending with .link blocked. Right now I
have only been able to block email addresses and full domain names. I know I can setup a transport rule in our exchange, but I'd prefer EOP handle this before like it should. Thanks in advance.

If you're using EOP and your goal is to block stuff coming from a certain geographic area then you need to go to your exchange admin center select Protection>content filter>Default Policy>International Spam>Filter email messages sent from the
following countries or regions

Naming your top level domain

I am setting up a new directory server for our organization, we'll call it direct.org.
I would like to know how you determine which way to name your top level domain.
o=direct
o=direct.org
dc=direct,dc=org
Most of the organizations around us use the "o=xxxx.org" or "o=xxxx.edu" so I set up our test server as o=direct.org. Before I put this thing into production I wanted to find out what factors are used to determine how you define the top level domain.
We are, in a sense, an ISP. However, our only clients are educational institutions.
I took Sun's Directory Server class last year and I asked this question in class. It seems that nobody could come up with a clear answer to this question.

For LDAP V2 - use o=direct.org
for LDAP V3 - use dc=direct,dc=org

DNS Server does not resolve new generic Top Level Domain names- CNR configuration issue?

Hi all,
I am not sure if this is the correct community to post this question, but I will give it a try. I noticed that the users of my network cannot resolve web sites using new top level domain names, like ".education", ".international", etc. I have an internal DNS server made by Infoblox and a Cisco CNR v6.3.3.1 as an external DNS server. Infoblox uses CNR as its forwarder and CNR uses the root DNS servers for queries.
I would think that CNR was the problem because it is an obsolete product but after speaking with a fellow engineer at another organization where they still use an older version of CNR than mine, they have no problems at all. So now I am thinking it is a setting either on Infoblox, or on CNR I need to change. I can see Infoblox is forwarding the requests to CNR but that's about it. I am not sure if CNR is discarding the request. When I do an nslookup from a PC in my network it does not matter if I set my DNS server to be the Infoblox or the CNR. Neither resolves the URL.
Then again, no matter what I lookup using the CNR as my DNS, I only get a response with the root DNS names and IPs!
Any help is appreciated!

Hi Constantinos,
Have you taken a look at the infoblox community site? We've just reposted your question there and alerted some internal SMEs that should provide a solution soon.
https://community.infoblox.com/forum/ddi/dns-server-does-not-resolve-new-generic-top-level-domain-names-cnr-configuration-issue
Best,
Eric

IMessage and new Top level domains

My new email address has a new top-level domain (.kiwi instead of .nz) - I am trying to get iMessage to allow the use of that address, but the verification email never arrives. Anyone know a way to convince Apple that my new email address is legitimate and can be used for iMessage and FaceTime?

Hello The-Organist,
After reviewing your post, I have located an article that can help in this situation. It contains a number of troubleshooting steps and helpful advice concerning Apple ID issues:
Frequently asked questions about Apple ID
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5622
How do I verify my Apple ID by email?
Simply follow the link in the verification email that says "Verify Now." Sign in with your current Apple ID and password, then click Verify Address. You can also verify by signing in at My Apple ID. You'll receive an email prompting you to verify.
Thank you for contributing to Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
BobbyD

Service interruption when adding cluster top level domain in CUCM 9.1.2?

I need to add a top level domain in CUCM 9.1.2. Will this result in any downtime or endpoint resets?

Hi,
No, it is not service impacting. It does not require any reset of devices or services.
HTH
Manish

Export with different audio levels

I need, very often, to export the same clip with different audio levels.
Is it possible to make presets with altered audio levels, let's say one for -12db and one for -8db.
Until now, i alter the audio level in Premiere, then I make one export, then I go back to Premiere, change again the audio level, I make the second export etc. It works, but it is very time consuming.
Thanx in advance.

It is currently not possible. However, feel free to log a feature request:
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

IRQxx is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels

Hi
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10x_u10wos_17b X86
HP DL380 G5
We have some messages in /var/adm/messages:
Oct 24 07:39:15 phssmb0a unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ17 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
Oct 24 07:39:40 phssmb0a unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
This may result in reduced system performance
echo ::interrupts -d | mdb -k
IRQ Vect IPL Bus Trg Type CPU Share APIC/INT# Driver Name(s)
1 0x40 5 ISA Edg Fixed 3 1 0x0/0x1 i8042#0
3 0xb1 12 ISA Edg Fixed 6 1 0x0/0x3 asy#1
4 0xb0 12 ISA Edg Fixed 5 1 0x0/0x4 asy#0
9 0x81 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x9 acpi_wrapper_isr
12 0x41 5 ISA Edg Fixed 4 1 0x0/0xc i8042#0
14 0x46 5 ISA Edg Fixed 2 1 0x0/0xe ata#0
16 0x84 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 7 2 0x0/0x10 ehci#0, uhci#0
17 0x85 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x11 uhci#1
18 0x86 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 3 2 0x0/0x12 uhci#2, cpqary3#0
19 0x87 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x13 uhci#3
22 0x88 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 2 2 0x0/0x16 uhci#4, cpqci#0
24 0x82 7 Edg MSI 2 1 - pcieb#1
25 0x30 4 Edg MSI 4 1 - pcieb#0
26 0x83 7 Edg MSI 5 1 - pcieb#2
27 0x31 4 Edg MSI 6 1 - pcieb#4
28 0x42 5 Edg MSI-X 5 1 - qlc#0
29 0x43 5 Edg MSI-X 6 1 - qlc#0
30 0x44 5 Edg MSI-X 7 1 - qlc#1
31 0x45 5 Edg MSI-X 0 1 - qlc#1
32 0x60 6 Edg MSI 1 1 - e1000g#0
160 0xa0 0 Edg IPI all 0 - poke_cpu
192 0xc0 13 Edg IPI all 1 - xc_serv
208 0xd0 14 Edg IPI all 1 - kcpc_hw_overflow_intr
209 0xd1 14 Edg IPI all 1 - cbe_fire
210 0xd3 14 Edg IPI all 1 - cbe_fire
240 0xe0 15 Edg IPI all 1 - xc_serv
241 0xe1 15 Edg IPI all 1 - apic_error_intr
What is the solution, help needed please
Walter

I am looking at something similar.
On boot I receive the above notices for IRQ 17 and IRQ18. Not seeing any further messages after boot, though.
# echo ::interrupts -d | mdb -k
IRQ Vect IPL Bus Trg Type CPU Share APIC/INT# Driver Name(s)
9 0x80 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x9 acpi_wrapper_isr
16 0x20 1 PCI Lvl Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x10 sdhost#0
17 0x81 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 1 4 0x0/0x11 ehci#2, ehci#1, ehci#0, yge#0
18 0x82 9 PCI Lvl Fixed 0 5 0x0/0x12 ohci#3, ohci#2, ohci#1, ohci#0, yge#1
19 0x40 5 PCI Lvl Fixed 0 2 0x0/0x13 pci-ide#0, pci-ide#0
24 0x83 7 PCI Edg MSI 1 1 - pcieb#0
25 0x30 4 PCI Edg MSI 0 1 - pcieb#1
26 0x84 7 PCI Edg MSI 1 1 - pcieb#2
27 0x31 4 PCI Edg MSI 0 1 - pcieb#4
28 0x85 7 PCI Edg MSI 1 1 - pcieb#5
29 0x60 6 PCI Edg MSI 1 1 - rge#0
160 0xa0 11 Edg IPI all 0 - poke_cpu
208 0xd0 14 Edg IPI all 1 - kcpc_hw_overflow_intr
209 0xd1 14 Edg IPI all 1 - cbe_fire
210 0xd3 14 Edg IPI all 1 - cbe_fire
240 0xe0 15 Edg IPI all 1 - xc_serv
241 0xe1 15 Edg IPI all 1 - apic_error_intr

IRQ20 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.

Hello!
In my logs this error occurs about once a day:
unix: [kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ20 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels.
This may result in reduced system performance.I cannot find any information about this message. Do I have to worry about it?
TIA
Stephan

I'm seeing the same error msg as well (with IRQ28).. Bump..

SW-3850 stacking with different License Levels?

we will be decommissioning the 3750 that is uplinked to a 3850-48port and will be connecting a 3850-24port in full stack-wise and stack-power High availability mode………now it will have the same IOS but the License Level will be different….so my question is will the two switches become stackable with different License Levels?

Hi,
it so not possible stack two switches with different licence. You will have to order new license to be same on both switches.
Please read Q&A for 3850 switch. See link below question "What are the license requirements for a Cisco Catalyst 3850 switch stack?"
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3850-series-switches/qa_c67-722110.html
HTH
Jan
Please rate answer if useful

Realms with different top-level domain

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for