Rebates (Subsequent settlement) settling to Debtor?

Hi,
I currently am trying to configure the MM Subsequent settlement process.
The business does not want to create a credit item on the suppliers account and would prefer to settle the rebate back to the suppliers customer account with us. Is this possible? If so what configuration steps do I need to do and what risks are you aware of doing it this way?
Regards
Alan

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

Similar Messages

Rebate- Subsequent Settlement

I am configuring subsequent settlement scenario. I want to know is there a provision to display rebate value in PO against condition type ( e.g if rebate condition type is A001 can rebate value be displayed against and is PO value calculated considering the rebate ? ) . Currently I can see " 0" against the condition type.

HI,
Please chk in the config....
SPRO>MM->purchasing-->Partner Determination->Partner setting in Rebate Arrangement--->Define partner schemas for Rebate..
Here please check the partner function "PI" is made mandatory...
You can main the Partner function "PI" in the agreement itself...
Goto t-code MEB2 & enter the agreement no, inside click the icon "Agreement Partner" or (Ctrl+F2) and maintain the partner function PI..
find below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm
Regards
Raj
Edited by: R.Rasumalla on Oct 21, 2011 6:37 PM
Moderator message:
Warning: Copy-pasted answer from someone else's work:
Issue in Vendor Rebate Settlement (ECC 6.0)
Please refrain from doing such things in the future. Please also don't do linkfarming.
Points will be removed.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 23, 2011 7:54 PM

Query on Rebates/Subsequent settlement

Hi,
The scenario is that Vendor reduces the price of an article.
There is some stock at hand and the vendor is ready to refund the difference.
Eg. Cost price of Cannon Digicam was 400$, now the Vendor reduces the price to 300$. He sends a notofication for this. If the stock at hand (DC stock + Store Stock) is 12 EA, then the vendor is ready to refund us (400-300)*12 = 1200$
How can u map this process in Retail. Currently we find out the Qty at hand using a report and multipy it with the cost difference in an excel and send it to the Vendor as a Rebate amount.
Vendor beleives on us for the Qty at hand.
Thanks
Kanica

Hi,
Yean i knw this. But you are actually not understanding the process.
We dont want to do this whole process of calculating stock on hand, creating rebate, changing MAP to be done one by one manually.
We just want an inetgrated approach where we just key in the new price and say its a vendor price change.. the system automatically calculates the qty on hand, calculates the rebate amount and cretaes a credit memo and also adjusts the moving avg price.
We are curretly doing the whole process manually as i had described... but we are looking for something better.
Cheers
Kanica

Purchase Rebate - Error during Settlement - MEB4

Hi Experts,
For the Purchase Rebate Scenario, I have followed the following steps :
1. Create Rebate Arrangement
2. Create PO
3. Goods Receipt
4. Invoice verification using MIRO
5. Check Update of business volume T-code : MEB6 Update of business volume was successful.
6. Execute Interim Setttement - Tcode MEB4
In this step, I am getting this error "Error messages generated during billing document check run" Message no. MN236
Settlement accounting for rebate arrangement 45 is carried out using the general billing interface in the system (credit-side settlement type) or the general billing interface for customer billing documents (debit-side settlement type).
It is also possible that credit memos (invoice verification, credit- side settlement type) are involved.
The documents cannot be created without errors.
Please help me out in this. What could have possibly gone wrong?
Thanks,
Maniraj

GO to SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Subsequent (End-of-Period Rebate) Settlement-Control of the "Subsequent Settlement" Process - Vendor Billing Document: Document Types
Select the following billing type
BM10     Fin.Set.Rebate,Plant
BM11     Fin.Set.Rebate, POrg
BM30     Part.Set.Rebate,Plnt
BM31     Part.Set.Rebate,POrg
double click on it and at the ente of the screen you will see control 2
here you need to enter the tax code

Rebate - Credit Memo Cancelled after Rebate is Finally Settled

Hi Friends,
Request your inputs on the correct way to handle the following scenario:
A Rebate had been finally settled on14.08.2011. The Credit Memo which was created for the final settlement on the same date 14.08.2011 has been cancelled later on 16.09.2011.
This has been done because we realized later that we do not want to give the credit to the rebate recipient. In this scenario; we have an open amount in the rebate because of the cancellation of the credit memo.
Please give your inputs on the following:
1) As per the standard SAP Process; Is it correct for a rebate to have an open amount after its final settlement has been done ? Is it correct to leave the Credit Memo Request in Open Status and NOT Bill it again ?
OR
2) If we again bill the Credit Memo Request ; we end up giving the credit to the rebate recipient; how would you suggest to reverse this accounting ?
OR
3) Any Other Option to handle this scenario ?
Looking forward to your valuable inputs
Thanks & Regards

Hi
When the customer is eligible for the rebate amount why you dont want to give that amount to the customer.Can you share the reason beyond this analysis
For your First Point , as per the standard SAP once the final settlement is done then credit memo request can be open or it can be billed.But it depend on the client requirement
For your second point, If you want to reverse the billing document,then again you have to create the credit memo with reference to the credit memo request again but it is not advisable.
But you can create the Credit Memo billing document and forward it to accounting also.But you can tell to FI team not use the credit amount for the customer transactions
Regards
Srinath

Vendor Rebate for Partial Settlement

Hi gurus,
I need your help, I am new with some part of the Rebate process and this is my case. I have a rebate agreement where the validity date is 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
We have many POs, GRs and IVs for the Vendor assigned to this agreement and the rebate agreement have one condition record with many discounts (like 10) with the validity date 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
I can see the POs where the discount was applied.
The situation is that I want to execute the partial settlement for this agreement FOR today, transaction MER4.
Then, in the "Settlement date" field I have selected = 31.03.2009 and
I have the option "Perform settlement accounting" selected too (it is in the Control data:settlement run section).
But, the system is telling me "No rebate arrangement chosen" and I know that I have Invoice Verifications made, why I cannot do a partial settlement?
Could you help me please?
Kind regards,
SP
Edited by: SANDRA PALOMO on May 3, 2011 2:41 PM

Sandra,
I know this post is closed but seems like you worked on Vendor Rebate Process.I am working on this first time.I have following scenario
I have one vendor for which we like to have vendor rebate for some specific materials.. The rebate is 10% of purchases, accrued monthly, receive quarterly and we like the moving average price should be reduced by the 10% rebate.
Can you please give me some guidance ?

Customer Rebate - article for settlement

Dear Colleagues,
In VBO1 (Customer Rebate), I must add for one Customer more than one Article for Settlement, in concordance with our Merchandise Categories:
-Footwear
-Apparel
-Accessories.
Is this possible?
Thank you.
John

Hi Miki,
If your question is that you want to assign more then one material for settlement in customer rebate then I dont think this is possible because as per knowledge you can use only one material for 0003 Customer Rebate.
Hope it helps,
Regards,
MT

Rebate Agreement , Final settlement credit memo request is rejected

Hi Friends,
When we go for final settlement of a rebate agreement we create a final settlement request. After doing so the agreement status becomes "C" and once we create the credit memo for this request the status of agreement moves to "D".
My Problem is there are few agreement wherein the final settlement request is craeted but rejected and these agreement are stuck in "C" status.
I want to push these agreements into "D" status. I am not able to find some way to do that . Need your help ?

Hi Ranjeet,
May be you can have a program to check status of the agreement, and update the agreement status to move from C to D , once you have the program this can be placed in SM35 as background job.
Pls c if this can give u some idea..
Regards
nawzir

Rebate processing and settlement

Hi All ,
how can i make the base for my scal in rebate is always zero (eg: 0: 1000 > 1%, 0:2000->2% , 0:3000--->3%)
and how can i make partial settelment to my rebate agreement?
htanks alot.

Hi,
You can maintain rebate scale type in Rebate conditions by V/06, see tab SCALE
And you can settle it by t-code VB(7
See under ACTIONS
there is optuions available final, partial settlement etc.
Kapil

Rebates" No valid settlement date could be determined"

When trying to create partial settlement we are getting the error "No valid settlement date could be determined"

Already you opened a similar thread on 6th and closed as Unanswered. Check here
["No valid settlement date could be determined"|"No valid settlement date could be determined";
Now you have opened a new thread which could have been avoided by changing the status of the above thread. Anyway, though lot of notes are there, you can have a look at the following notes:-
=> Note 75778 - Consulting/troubleshooting for rebate processing
=> Note 105681 - Consulting: New rebate procedure
=> Note 1065418 - Incorrect date calculation within rebate processing
G. Lakshmipathi

Service charge settlement - cannot settle Settlement Units.

Hello,
I am trying to run RESCSE (service charge settlement) for a BE. After I have run the job, the job finishes very fast (less than a minute) and shows the status as 'finished'. When I am looking at the Settlement Unit under the BE, I find that for that month (for which the settlement was run), the status shows the symbol of a lock. Nothing seems to have been settled.
When I went back to the job log to check the steps, I found that though the job has finished, it has one line which says "batch processing not possible". But when I had run RESCSE, I had run it ONLY for this BE and not as a batch. Also, it has a line that shows that a settlement id has been generated but next to it is written, successful steps: 0; incorrect steps: 1.
Can someone please guide me how to investigate this issue?
Regards,
Suvarghya Dutta

Hi ,
Reg this SCS you can settle it to Contract level only .You can not settle to pertaining to the object .
Check in the contract u have given the participation group as BE or not.
Regards,
Mohan

Vendor Rebate Settlement Issue

Hello All,
I have created a Vendor rebate agreement for the fiscal year 2009 (validity period 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009). The agreement has 2 conditions - one for 'Vendor/Material' and another for 'Vendor'.
I notice that every month end after I run the period settlement (using transaction MEb2), a large portion of the accrued rebate amount is left unsettled. I checked the corresponding purchase orders - they have been invoiced and have an accrued rebate amount.
As I can find nothing wrong, I am forced to make a manual settlement for the unsettled amount.
Can anyone please help me identify the reason for the under settlement and provide suggestions to prevent it?
Thanks,
Rugmani

hiii
please check this thread
Vendor Rebate - Subsequent settlement
Hope it works
regards,
rahul.

Rebate settlement

Hi Team,
while settling the rebate i am gettting the error sales volume for agreement is not current. any help in solving this will be appreciated.
Regards,
Sasmita

Hi Sasmita
Rebate agreemnts is based on agreement types.Conditon records which are created like B001 and B002 are linked to the rebate agreeements specifying the rebate rate + the accrual rates.condition records specify the rebate rate and the accrual rates.
Consider an example..
You decided to give a rebate of 3% to a customer whose sales vol is $1000 for a particular SO
Then the rebate value is $30..
Now when you make the rebate settlement by doiing the Credit memo and you decide to pay $27, then the accounting will be generated saying 27$ paid towards rebate and 3$ is the accrual which you owe to the customer
Procedure:
Rebate agreement: Transaction code: VB01
When you go to VB01, choose agreement type 0002 and then in conditions give
Material rebate
1 20
20 30
Now create a sales order with a material say M-11 for SOrg 1000 12 00 with QTY 6
Now check VB03 and see rebate agreemtent it will say Accruals 120 and payments 0
since your rebate is not settled still.
Rebate setllement
Go to VB02 enter ur sales deal no, and change the agreemetn status to B then enter Shift+F12 and enter the amount to be paid for example u say $80
Then check in rebate payments rebate doc and partial setllemetn since you have not paid in full.
View the credit memo request
Remove the Billing bloock Go to VA01 and put order type G2 ,,go to create with ref and enter ur Sales order no,,save the doc now.
Then go to VF01 and enter the credit memo reqst no generated...save the doc no and go to VF02 and say release to accounting
Reward if useful to u

Subsequent debit function for MRKO settlement

Hi,
We have one business requirement for one of our client,
The business requirement is ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is paid for the amount of Rs 150 for the qty of 10. After the automatic invoice settlement via using t.coe MRRL, We can able to Post the subsequent debit for the for qty of 10 and amount increased of 200 by vendor. Incase of price changed by vendor after settlement through the ERS we can post the excess amount using subsequent debit settled accordingly.
The same requirement is needed for Consignment and Pipeline settlment (MRKO) function also,but however we settled the invoice using MRKO after that in MIRO transaction not able to post the corrosponding subsequent debit.
Any other setting is require to post the subsequent debit for consignment and pipe line?
How to settle the excess amount in case of price change of consignment invoice?
- Regards,
Velu

Hi,
ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is always refer the PO .
so, you can post the Subsequent debit if price increase. because price dertermined from Purchase Order.
But MRKO. the Price determined from Info record.
If the Info record the how can we use subsequent debit option.
also MRKO is the process to intimate to consignment vendor about the cunsumption only. it won't determine any price.
Not possible to use subsequent functionality for MRKO.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 23, 2010 3:04 PM

Rebate partial settlement

Hello Experts
Is it possible to apply the scales based on the rebates during partial settlement, currently it seems the standard rebates in the system will apply rebate scales only once the Final settlement is carried out ?
Please suggest.
Thanks

Hi Mahendra,
This is a system limitation. Standard rebates cannot consider the scales during partial settlement. Partial settlement amounts are intended to be entered manually. Only during the final settlement can the system calculate the settlement amount based on the scales defined in the agreement. The system will only be able to apply the scales on rebates only once when the final volume is known and this will happen only when the Final settlement is carried out.
Regards,
Chetan Bagga

Rebates (Subsequent settlement) settling to Debtor?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for