Recommended IE version for 11.5 sp 6

Hi,
Which version of IE is recommended for xMII 11.5 sp 6 client systems?
Currently, we are using IE 6 updated with SP 3 on client systems and so far we never ran into any issues.
But, recently we tested with IE 7 and IE 8 because customer wanted to upgrade to higher versions of IE but found some issues with applets failing to load and some Java exceptions.
Is there any specific documentation of what versions of IE is recommended or which is more stable?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Adarsh

For the most part MII claims to be browser neutral.
I may be wrong.
But if you are looking @ some odd behavior after an IE upgrade I would say to play with JRE versions and also revisiting the JS code on your Web Pages.

Similar Messages

  • Recommended JVM Version for ZfS 6.5 SP1 on NetWare 6 SP5 w/NCS

    Quick question - what is the recommended version of the NetWare JVM to use
    with ZfS 6.5 SP1? I'm running NW6SP5, ZfS65 with SP1 applied, and Tomcat
    3.3. Right now I'm using JVM 1.4.2_6 and just wanted to verify there are no
    known issues with JVM 1.4.2_6 playing well with ZfS 6.5 SP1. Running on on
    a 2 node cluster.I plan to add ZfD 6.5 SP1 to the cluster soon - primarily
    for HA inventory services. Thanks in advance for any input.

    Ron,
    Thanks for the general advice. That's what I thought, but sometimes we
    all need a sanity check. Especially when you see java thread death
    messages when the distributor starts up :-) Not due to the JVM.
    > In General, use the JVM version that shipped at the same time as the
    NetWare
    > Service Pack you're using.
    >
    > For NetWare 6 this still gives you the choice between JVM 1.3.x and
    1.4.x,
    > my preference is the JVM 1.4.2 as it has better performance then the
    1.3.x.
    > The 1.4.2_6 your using is quit stable, no major issues known.
    >
    > Ron
    >
    >
    > <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:MaeMe.444$[email protected]..
    > > Quick question - what is the recommended version of the NetWare JVM
    to use
    > > with ZfS 6.5 SP1? I'm running NW6SP5, ZfS65 with SP1 applied, and
    Tomcat
    > > 3.3. Right now I'm using JVM 1.4.2_6 and just wanted to verify there
    are
    > no
    > > known issues with JVM 1.4.2_6 playing well with ZfS 6.5 SP1. Running
    on on
    > > a 2 node cluster.I plan to add ZfD 6.5 SP1 to the cluster soon -
    primarily
    > > for HA inventory services. Thanks in advance for any input.
    >
    >

  • Recommended Oracle version for SAP 4.7 and for BW 3.5

    Hi,
    where I can find the SAP's recommended version of Oracle for SAP ERP 4.7 and BW 3.5?
    Thanks
    Message was edited by:
            giovanni maria maccioni

    Hi,
    Recommended would be 10.2.0.2
    Oracle has ended the customer care support for 9.2 in July 2007:
    Note 925871 - Discontinuation of 'Customer Care Support' for Oracle 9.2
    At the same time, SAP customers have a "free" year of  Extended Support for Version 9.2.
    9.2.0.8 is the latest patch set provided for 9.2. (see note 1021844)
    I think that, if you are planning to perform a new installation, it would be better to do it in 10.2

  • Java Version for PI 7.1

    Hi all,
    Can anyone please tell  me what is the exact recommended JRE version for PI 7.1 with enhancement package1.
    thanks in advance
    Jagruthi

    Hi,
        I think PI 7.1 works fine with java version 1.5 and 1.6 (not sure..though)
    May be what you can check is un-install the existing Java version (old versions if so) and open the Home page of the PI
    it will show the version needed (try this) for PI 7.0 it was showing for me which version to download in google chrome browser...
    HTH
    Rajesh

  • WLC software version for "N"

    Greetings -
    I have a WLC4402 currently running software version 4.2.207.0. With 802.11n just getting officially ratified I was wondering what is the "Cisco-recommended" software version for 802.11n? Should I stay at 4.2.207.0 or move up to 5.x/6.x? I have 1252 access points that are using 3560-E switches for ePoE (20w for powering both the 2.4Ghz and 5 Ghz radios).
    Any information would be greatly appreciated.
    Thx
    Joe

    Thx for the reply.
    I wanted to stay at version 4.2 if I could. Reason being is that 4.2.x has been very stable and reliable for me while I cannot say I have had the same experience with 5.x. If 4.2.x will support 802.11n then I will continue to use it. Being that the ratification was just announced a couple of weeks ago I didn't know if Cisco had version of software that they recommended for 802.11n deployments.
    Thx again for your input.
    Joe

  • I have not used my CS3 version for about 3-4 years.  I tried to use it recently and I get a message about activation.  Called the phone number recommended but no longer in use.  How do I start using MY version I paid for?  Using PC

    I have not used my CS3 version for about 3-4 years.  I tried to use it recently and I get a message about activation.  Called the phone number recommended but no longer in use.  How do I start using MY version I paid for?  Using PC

    Can you activate CS3. If you lost your serial you can retrieve it from Adobe.com. Sign in at Adobe.com the use this link https://www.adobe.com/account/my-products-services.html When your Adobe Product list is displayed click on your CS3 product your serial number should be displayed.

  • Solaris 10 SPARC Recommended Patch Cluster for  2008 quarter 3 version

    Dear All,
    Could any one please guide me, where I can download "Solaris 10 SPARC Recommended Patch Cluster" for 2008 quarter 3 version.
    I have checked in sunsolve.sun.com, I'm able to find only the latest release.
    please guide me.
    Thanks and regards,
    veera

    Ok,
    Here's a cute little formula to try using your systems parameters to gain some "head's-up" on an expected or estimated time to complete the patch run.
    You will need a few things to prepare.
    Number of "real" CPU's (not hyperthreads)
    Speed of each CPU as a whole number i.e 2.87Ghz = 2,867
    the total number of patches from the cluster i.e. Sept 15th = 381 (Solaris 10)
    Network factor if using NFS = 2.5
    local cluster file factor = 1.5
    Patch cluster on CDROM factor = 3.25
    Now, combine all of those elements in this equation:
    { ( #1 * #2 ) / #3 * factor(#4 or #5 or #6) }
    This will yield a number in minutes of patch run time. Then all you will need to add is the standard boot up time to get the total of all patching and reboot.
    Of course you could write a script to extract all of this information and feed it to "bc -l" to get a quick figure.
    Example, on one of my Solaris 10 boxes with the information filled in to the equation:
    #> echo "((4*2660)/381)*1.5"|bc -l
    #> 41.88976377952755905511
    It actually took 44.2 minutes to complete the patching of this box plus another 12 minutes to reboot. But all in all a pretty fair estimate I think.

  • Upgrade MacPro1,1 with ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512 MB and Open GL 1.7.7. to recommended system requirements for heli simulator: OpenGL Version 2.1 compatible 3D-graphics card from NVIDIA or ATI with 512MB.

    I want to install a helicopter simulator into my MacPro1,1 with ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512 MB and Open GL 1.7.7. Recommended system requirements for the heli simulator are: OpenGL Version 2.1 compatible 3D-graphics card from NVIDIA or ATI with 512MB (at least as fast as NVIDIA 8600, 9400 or ATI Radeon HD 2400). Is there such a graphics card available that will work in my Mac Pro?

    Are you really still running 10.6.3? you will need 10.6.5+ so do that and make a clone.
    ATI 5770 from Apple Store - like 1000s of others have done and in the comments section on the store page.

  • What is a recommended decompression software for a non-Lion compatible MacBook Pro 1,1 2 GHz Intel Core Duo running OS X Version 10.6.8?

    What is a recommended decompression software for a non-Lion compatible MacBook Pro 1,1 2 GHz Intel Core Duo running OS X Version 10.6.8?

    My thanks to you and all other respondents.  In backing up "theVault" App I thought that my ancient version of Stuffit was inadequate to unzip the backup file.  I attempted to download the latest Zipit version which only works with Lion.  After upgrading to Stuffit 9 I realized that theVault backup file was encrypted so as to not open on the backup Mac.  One must restore to the iPhone where is does open.
    My apologies for the imprecise post.  I am finding limitations with not being able to install Lion on my early MacBook Pro.  I can recommend theVault to those looking for a password App with secure backup.

  • Is it not recommended to use FOR ALL ENTRIES in version 4.5B

    Hi,
    Is it not recommended to used For all entries in version 4.5B as  Size limit for SQL is 32KB hence we should not be using FOR ALL ENTRIES, instead of this we should be using select inside the loop?
    Can anyone please let me know if this is correct and if you can provide me the SAP documentation on the specific statement.
    Regards
    Ria

    Hi Ria,
    From what I understand, you cannot use JOINS with FOR ALL ENTRIES in 4.5b & lower versions. In general the SELECT..FOR ALL ENTRIES statement has been in use from 3.1i versions. For more information, PL take a look at OSS Note #652634.
    Regards,
    Suresh Datti

  • What is the recommended version for ITS?

    HI Experts,
    what is the recommended versions for ITS?
    We have SAP R/3 4.6c and WAS 6.40 ................what will be the recommened versions ITS for the above said SAP R/3 4.6c and WAS 6.40 combination...........
    and also furnish the list of all versions of SAP R/3 ,WAS and ITS........
    Higher points will be rewarded for useful inputs........
    Thanks in Advance,
    Shakthi

    ITS 6.20 gets well with 4.7.. There was ITS 6.4 also released but there were some issues.. you can check the ITS release note from
    https://service.sap.com/notes for more info.
    Hope this helps
    rgds

  • Recommended IOS XE version for Cisco Catalyst 4500X-16 SFP+ Switch

    Could someone confirm IOS XE version for Cisco Catalyst 4500X-16 SFP+ Switch please.
    It already has 03.06.00.E on it. I am planning to configure VSS on it with similar switch.
    VSS will participate in various Etherchannels (MES).
    Just wondering if there are any known bugs in this IOS XE release.

    Use the Bug Search Tool to look for issues with vss, vsl, etc.
    https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/

  • Best Safari version for 10.6.6

    I'm running Safari 5.0.2 on a 15" Macbook Pro running Snow Leopard 10.6.6.
    I'm having issues with some sites so wish to try another version of Safari to see if that will help.
    I downloaded versions 5.0.2 (just for safety if I had to return to it), 5.0.3 and 5.1.1, all of which said they were compatible with Snow Leopard.
    When I attempt to install 5.0.3 it says it cannot install as it needs OS version 10.6.5
    When I attempt to install 5.1.1 it says it cannot install as it needs OS version 10.6.7
    Even when I attempt to install 5.0.2 it says it cannot install as it needs OS version 10.6.4
    What Gives?  Is there a version of Safari out there that will install onto OS 10.6.6?
    Please don't recommend me changing my operating system, I am staying with this version for other compatibility reasons.  The question is:
    Is there a version of Safari out there that will install onto OS 10.6.6?  And if so can you recommend the site in which to find it?  Thank you.

    Hi..
    Is there a version of Safari out there that will install onto OS 10.6.6?  And if so can you recommend the site in which to find it?
    Never install anywhere but from the Apple support page.
    Not running the latest Mac OS X puts your Mac at risk for malware. For whatever reason you are not running v10.6.8, consider updating to v10.6.8 and Safari 5.1.5.
    All you have to do is click your Apple menu > Software Update

  • RoboHelp HTML Version 9 - what is the version for ehlpdhtm.js?

    We have been running pen tests looking for vulnerabilites on applications my company has created in order to be PCI certified. I built webhelp systems for these applications using RoboHTML v9.
    The pen test has indicated that ehlpdhtm.js is suspect with the following message:
    WebInspect detected the use of an ActiveX object. This could indicate a vulnerability is present if a vulnerable public version of the Microsoft Active Template was utilized. There are three vulnerabilities in the public versions of the Microsoft Active Template Library (ATL) included with Visual Studio. Applications and components created with these versions of ATL are vulnerable to remote code execution and information disclosure attacks. Visual Studio itself is not vulnerable to these issues. In these three vulnerabilities, ATL processes data incorrectly which can lead to memory corruption, information disclosure, and instantiation of objects without regard to security policy. After Visual Studio is patched, it will no longer create applications and components with these vulnerabilities. However, applications and components compiled using the vulnerable version of ATL need to be rebuilt with the safe version released by Microsoft. Recommendations include applying any relevant service pack or patch as listed in the Fix section, then recompiling and redistrubiting any software created prior to the update. If you have already applied the proper fix, then this vulnerability can safely be ignored.
    Explanation
    Any application compiled using the vulnerable active template could be subject to code execution and information disclosure vulnerabilities.
    What is the latest version of the ehlpdhtm.js file?
    The copyright inside the file is:
    // Dynamic HTML JavaScript
    // Copyright © 1998-2009 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved.
    // Version=8.0
    If this is not the latest version, is there somewhere I can get the latest file? If not, I won't be able to use the dynamic html features of RoboHTML.

    If you have the latest patch installed (9.0.2), you have the latest version of ehlpdhtm.js. There was an XSS vulnerability fix for 9.0.1, but that is included in 9.0.2. From what I can see in my installation, version 8.0 is the latest version for RoboHelp 9.
    RoboHelp 11 has a newer version of the file, but the active x is still in there.
    I'm not a security expert. The ActiveX is used for supporting old versions of IE and CHM's. It should not be used by modern browsers. I've never heard of RoboHelp being abused in this way so I would deem it safe. But again, that's just my layman opinion.
    Kind regards,
    Willam

  • I am attempting to upgrade from Adobe Premier Elements 9 to Adobe Premier Elements 13 after using 13's trial version for a few weeks.  I am unable to find where and how to do this without losing the project I have been working on.  Please help?

    I am attempting to upgrade from Adobe Premier Elements 9 to Adobe Premier Elements 13 after using 13's trial version for a few weeks.  I am unable to find where and how to do this without losing the project I have been working on.  Please help?

    Vere Clarke
    Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1 and Premiere Elements 13 are standalone products.
    So, you can have both on the same computer, but only open one for your work.
    The classical recommendation is to finish a project in the version in which it was created since there
    is no guarantee that a project from an earlier version will open in the later version. Probably will, but
    no guarantees. And, when you do explore this, do it from a copy of the earlier version project. Once you
    take the earlier version project into a later version one, you cannot go back to edit the later version edited
    project in the earlier version program.
    If you have both versions (9 and 13) on the same computer and you have not moved, deleted, renamed any of the version 9's files/folders,
    right click the saved closed Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1 project file, select Open With, and then Adobe Premiere Elements 13.
    (Your 9.0/9.0.1 saved closed project file should be found in Libraries/Documents/Adobe/Premiere Elements/9.0.)
    Please review and consider. If any questions or need clarification, please do not hesitate to let me know.
    Thank you.
    ATR

Maybe you are looking for