Reconcile Delivary Balances - Aging Report

Hi,
How to reconcile the Delivary Balances..which is showing in Aging Report even the A/R invoices amounts are reconciled.
Thanks
Srini

Hi srini
if there is balcnce between the payment then how intitially were u able to reconsile because to reconsile the difference between two documents should be 0
so u managed to erconsile the payment when difference was > 0.
However any fiffernce in oayment can be dealt by either creating incomin/outgoing payment or by journal entry
Regards,
Manish

Similar Messages

Customer Open Balance Aging Report S_ALR_87012178

hello,
we are using this report Customer Open Balance Aging Report S_ALR_87012178 but when run, it brings customers' names from VD03 search field, instead it would be handy to see full names from Name-field. I understand S_ALR_87012178 is a static report, but my question would be is there any other transaction/report which shows the same but with customers' full name?
thanks in advance

S_ALR_87012178 is the only standard customer aging report.
Following two solutions I could think of to fit your requirements.
Develop a custom report by copying standard customer reports that have full customer name and make changes according to your need.
Or
In report S_ALR_87012178 the customer name is populated in Address field. So you can use this field as your customer name and develop a custom report.
Thanks

Reconciled amounts appears in vendor aging report

Dear all,
When we take report for reconciled transactions,reconciled amounts appears in
aging days(Suppose we have ap invoice in 0-30 days and payments made in 30-60 days it's
already reconciled)
Why it is showing in reconciled aging report ?
Jeyakanthan

Dear，
would like to recommend you to refer to the following note： 1228363-Business Partner Balance does not match journal entries。
In any SAP Business One version lower than 2007, 2 separate
reconciliation engines were employed. One reconciliation engine worked
on the marketing document level, where partial reconciliation was
supported & the other worked on the journal entry level, where only
complete reconciliation was supported.
This duality led in some instances to reconciliation inconsistencies
which were initially highlighted with SAP Business One version 2004
patch level 29, where the red message 'Business Partner balance does not
match journal entries' was displayed when running the ageing report by
sales documents & inconsistencies were detected.
In the year end closing guides (available for download from the
Documentation Resource Centre) SAP have always recommended to run the
ageing reports by journal posting.
In 2006, SAP published note 752261, now retired, documenting the system
behaviour & offering a series of 'Select' queries to aid in
reconciliation inconsistency analysis. These queries were an excellent
tool but now SAP can offer a faster, better & more accurate solution.
In SAP Business One 2007 A & B the reconciliation engines have been
unified & partial reconciliation on journal entry level is now fully
supported. Any database that is upgraded from a lower version undergoes
a complex series of reconciliation upgrade algorithms, where any
reconciliation inconsistency is identified & a reconciliation upgrade
(RU) journal entry is automatically created. This RU journal does not
document any accounting transaction, but simply creates an update in the
'Balance Due' column, thus notionally re-openeing previously
inconsistently reconciled transactions.
These RU journals are then available for internal reconciliation.
Please consult the 2007 Internal Reconciliation Upgrade(IRU)Landing
Page:
Channel Partner Portal -> Solutions -> SAP Business One -> Hot Topics ->
SAP Business One 2007 Information Center -> New Single Reconciliation
Engine- A single engine reconciles the difference and eliminates the
previous reconciliation issue. More
Click on 'More' to be directed to the IRU Landing Page.
Here you will find 'How-to-Guides' in all supported languages, links to
Expert Training Sessions & links to other pertinent information.
You will also find available for download 2007 A & B upgrade simulation
tools. SAP recommends to subject a database that is planned to be
upgraded
This upgrade simulation tool employs all internal reconciliation upgrade
algorithms & the application will display in the 'Internal
Reconciliation Upgrade Audit Trail Report' if a database is affected by
inconcistencies.
Hence, if the message 'Business Partner Balance does not match Journal
Entries' is encountered, proceed as follows:
Option 1:
Upgrade database to SAP Business One 2007 & internally reconcile any RU
journals.
Option 2:
Go to the IRU landing page & download the 'IRU pre-upgrade tool' either
for version 2007A or 2007B, depending on your localisation. Follow the
installation instructions & after successful installation & simulated
upgarde of the database, analyse any inconsistencies appearing with the
help of the How-to-guide. Should a type of inconsistency not have a drop
down arrow & be described as 'Balancing upgrade journal transaction',
the comapny accountant may decide to write it off, should the amount be
insignificant or, if the amount is not insignificant, please log a
support ticket with the component:
SBO-ADM-UT-IAT
Step by step detailed instructions including screenshots of how to
install the sim-tool & what it does can be found on this wiki page:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/BPaccountBalancedoesnot+matc
chJournalEntries
Thanks & Regards
Apple

Aging reports that display reconciled transactions

Currently ie 2007a PL 35, when an aging report is run that displays reconciled transactions it is displaying all reconciled transactions including those reconciled before the aging date. My understanding of this feature was that it was intended to allow clients to run past dated aging correctly and for totals it does. However I have a client who works with detailed aging extensively and they would like a feature that would allow an aging report that would only show open balances that had been reconciled after the aging date. would it be possible to implement this into the current aging selection criteria?? It would help clients produce more accurate historical aging reports.
Regards,
John-Michael

Which SAP B1 Version and Patch is under use at your end ?
There were issues in SAP B1 regarding reconcilliations in versions prior to 2007 series.
Samir Gandhi

Customer Aging Report(without reconciled transaction)-what types of documents are considered?

Hi Friends,
As per my knowledge,Customer Aging Report consider only those documents(ar invoice,ar downpayment,incoming payment-payment on a/c,ar credit memo) which are open and showing balance due and standalone JE against Customer.
As I cross checked,I found those standalone JE where Customer and round off account are considered as debit,credit are not considered by 'Customer Aging report'.
So,I just want to know what are all the logic based on which SAP B1 standard report 'Customer Aging ' (without reconciled transaction ) consider the documents????

Which SAP B1 Version and Patch is under use at your end ?
There were issues in SAP B1 regarding reconcilliations in versions prior to 2007 series.
Samir Gandhi

AR AGING REPORT. Why 'BalDueDeb' minus 'BalDueCred' not same as Balance?

Dear All,
I am trying to build SQL which mimics the AR Aging Report in SAP B1 8.8. Reason is to add additional fields needed by Management. I get the SAME TOTAL as Ageing, but when I run my query, I can't get the same no. of rows as Aging.
Aging has 700 rows (NOT display reconciled transactions), and my aim is to get the same no. of rows.
Case I: When I use: WHERE (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) != 0
I get 816 rows. All zero balances are eliminated, but it seems that some transactions which have been reconciled appear in my report as outstanding debits and also credits. This is why it has more rows than Aging, although total is correct.
Case II: When I use: WHERE Balance !=0
I get 5026 rows. Many rows show zero balances. I don't understand why they are not eliminated. I thought the 2 commands were equivalent.
But the good news is that when I export to Excel and delete all those zero rows, I get exactly 700 rows, same as Aging!
Same total, same no. of rows!
If anybody could help me complete my query, I can continue. How can I eliminate these rows having zero balances? Where have I gone wrong?
Thanks a lot.
Leon Lai
=========================================================================================
SELECT distinct
T1.CardCode,
T1.CardName,
T0.RefDate,
CASE
           WHEN T0.TransType=13 THEN 'IN'
           WHEN T0.TransType=14 THEN 'CN'
           WHEN T0.TransType=30 THEN 'JE'
           WHEN T0.TransType=24 THEN 'RC'
           WHEN T0.TransType=46 THEN 'PS'
           ELSE 'Error ! ! ! !'
END AS 'Document Type',
T0.Ref1 'Document Number',
CASE
           WHEN T0.TransType=13 THEN 'IN' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=14 THEN 'CN' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=30 THEN 'JE' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=24 THEN 'RC' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=46 THEN 'PS' + T0.Ref1
           ELSE 'Error ! ! ! !'
END AS 'Concat',
T0.Account,
T0.Line_ID AS 'Row',
T0.BalDueDeb,
T0.BalDueCred,
T0.TransId AS 'Id JDT1',
(T0.BalDueDeb- T0.BalDueCred) AS 'Balance'
FROM JDT1 T0 inner join ocrd t1 on t0.Shortname = t1.CardCode
WHERE T1.CardType = 'C'
PROBLEM IS HERE--??????????????--
--and (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) != 0
and Balance != 0
-- The query gives different results depending on which of the above lines is run. Why?
PROBLEM IS HERE--??????????????--
ORDER BY T1.CardCode, T0.RefDate, T0.Ref1

Dear Gordon,
Thanks for your reply, and sorry for the incomplete reply which went beyond my control.
Here are my results using WHERE (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) !=0
I have compared Aging Report with SQL Query.
Doc Type Aging Rows         Aging Total     SQL Rows    SQL Total*
CN            57        -214,315.34     57        -214,315.34
IN           452       4,741,436.41     452       4,741,436.41
JE           134         202,209.56     267         201,584.56
PS            12         107,652.40     18         121,352.40
RC             4        -107,168.04     10        -120,243.04
           659       4,729,815.00     804        4,729,815.00
The results are messy, time consuming to generate and investigate. Too much for newbee!
The main differences lie in JE; about x2 rows in SQL Query.
This may be due to rows that have reconciled in Aging, but appear in SQL Query.
I have also prepared a list of Doc. Nos where there are differences, but too lengthy.
TO Help you understand what's happening the foll. remarks may help:
(1) The T0.Ref1 'Document Number' is empty for all JE. However, for other Doc types, these exist and agree with Aging.
(2) Although 'Document Number' is empty for JE, there is a column Ref1 which does give a reference which agrees with Aging
(3) A specific document always has 1 row in Aging, but may have several rows in my query
(4) I do not know why using: WHERE Balance !=0 works, but it does give a near perfect result. Why not use this as starting point? After deleting all the zero rows which it cannot delete, I GET EXACTLY the same result as SAP B1 8.8 Report 'Aged Analysis of Debtors'. Same no. of rows, Same total. How to delete these zeros in SQL?
(5) In SAP B1 forum, it seems many persons still cannot arrive at the official Aging. I maybe near the correct solution, but no idea why it works.
(6) I am continuing the struggle - maybe I need to put a sub query to eliminate the zeros first?
Thanks
Leon Lai

Reconciled transactions appearing in customer aging report

Hi all,
I have 2 Invoices amount to 2000 rs say 1000 rs each.I received a payment of 1900 rs i.e a 100 rs less for the 2 invoices.My accountant has recorded this in the following manner that he has selected both the invoices and an "On account" payment of -100, so the entire transaction got balanced.As a result both the invoices are closed as well.
Now my question is ....can we treat this a reconclied trasaction or an Un-reconciled trasaction.Will these both invoices appear in the customer aging report if we select "display reconciled trasactions" option.
Regards & Advance thanks,
Mobin

Which SAP B1 Version and Patch is under use at your end ?
There were issues in SAP B1 regarding reconcilliations in versions prior to 2007 series.
Samir Gandhi

Aging Report does not match Balance Sheet Receivables/Payables Account

Hi experts,
I am requesting your help to find out why our customer receivables/vendor payables aging reports total does not match our balance sheet accounts receivable/ accounts payable account for the same period.
I would expect
Customer Receivables Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Receivables Account
Vendor Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Payables Account
Thank you.
Jane

When you run the report with an ending/aging date in the past (like the end of last month), if you do not display BP's with zero balances, it will leave out BP's who have a zero balance AT THE TIME YOU RUN THE REPORT. Some of them may have had a non-zero balance at the end of the month, but they will be left off anyway. So if a customer owed money on the last day of the month and he paid it on the first of the next month, his balance will not be shown on the report if you run it even one day later.
I feel this is a design defect in the report, but it is the system behavior.
Marcia

Vendor Aging Report to show zero balance does not show all vendors

Hi all,
I would like to see a list of all my vendors in the Vendor Aging Report. I clicked on show vendors with zero balance, however, I still only get a partial list of the vendors. Is there a setting I need to set to show all the vendors? Any advice would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Jane

Hi,
I think your requirement is you want all vendors displayed irrespective of the transactions entered for that Business Partner.
The Aging Report will display only those BPs which have transactions posted to them.
The function of 'Display Vendors with zero balance' checkbox is that it behaves like a selection creteria and leads to inclusion
of all those Business Partners who do not have a balance as of the current date but had a balance on the selected backdate.
example :
If a vendor has a balance as on 01.08.08 and is paid on 10.08.08, then the vendor will not be included in aging report (when run on 01.08.08) unless "Include Vendors with zero balance" is checked.
This checkbox does not allow you to display all the vendors created in the database.
Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Reconciled amounts appears in customer aging report

Dear all,
When we take aging report for reconciled transactions,reconciled amounts appears in
aging days ,the invoices which are reconciled still showing in Aging report (Suppose we have ar invoice in 0-30 days and its payments (journal entry ) made in 30-60 days it's
already reconciled)
Why it is showing in reconciled aging report ?
I am using B1 2007 Pl 17
Regards
Saurav Gupta

Hi Saurav Gupta,
the ageing report allows you to pinpoint open transactions at a particular date.
Consider this:
System Date (Today) : 08.08.2011
Ageing date 01.08.2011
Invoice Posting date: 20.07.2011, due date : 31.07.2011
Payment Date for invoice 02.08.2011
You allow documents to be considered up to the ageing date.
-> The invoice above, although fully paid, will be shown as overdue since you are ignoring all transactions after the ageing date. As far as the report is concerned, the payment hasn't happened yet.
With these options, the invoice will be shown as well:
System Date (Today) : 08.08.2011
Ageing date 01.08.2011
Invoice Posting date: 20.07.2011, due date : 31.07.2011
Payment Date for invoice 02.08.2011
You allow documents to be considered up to the system date & choose to display reconciled transactions.
-> all documents up to today will be taken into consideration, meaning that both the invoice & the payment are shown in the report.
To see the true open documents today, choose these parameters:
System Date (Today) : 08.08.2011
Ageing date 08.08.2011
You allow documents to be considered up to the system date & have all tickboxes unchecked.
Also, please upgrade your system at the earliest convenience, you are using a very old version.
All the best,
Kerstin

Not able to pick Opening Balance in Ageing Report

Hi
I have made an query for customer ageing report based on our requirement, but am not able to fetch the OB (Opening Balance) in that. If i generate Customer ageing report from B1, its showing the OB in the first line, then it showing the open invoices on the corresponding ageing days.
Can anyone help me to fetch the opening balance in ageing report. Below is the query i have given for ageing.
SELECT     NNM1.Remark AS Branch, OINV.DocNum, OINV.NumAtCard AS VendorRef, OINV.DocType AS Type, OINV.DocStatus AS Status, OINV.DocDate,
                      OINV.DocDueDate, OINV.CardCode, OINV.CardName, OINV.DocTotal, OINV.PaidToDate AS [Paid/Credited],
                      OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate AS [Balance Due], (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN - 120 AND
                      0 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS 'Less then Due Date', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 0 AND
                      30 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '0 - 30', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 31 AND
                      45 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '30 - 45', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 46 AND
                      60 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '45 - 60', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 61 AND
                      90 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '60-90', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 91 AND
                      120 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '90-120', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate())
                      > 120 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '120 +', OSLP.SlpName, OUBR.Name
FROM         OINV AS OINV INNER JOIN
                      NNM1 AS NNM1 ON OINV.Series = NNM1.Series INNER JOIN
                      OSLP ON OINV.SlpCode = OSLP.SlpCode INNER JOIN
                      OHEM ON OSLP.SlpCode = OHEM.salesPrson INNER JOIN
                      OUBR ON OHEM.branch = OUBR.Code
WHERE     (OINV.DocStatus = 'O') AND (OUBR.Code IN (@Branch)) AND (OSLP.SlpCode IN (@SalesEmployee))
ORDER BY OINV.CardName, OSLP.SlpName
How to add the OB in the above query.

Check note 1023083 and for information about the expected release date of the patch please view note 578944.this problem is related to the new SAP GUI 7 patch-level 0. There is something wrong with the GUI function to get information from the local registry (CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>REGISTRY_GET_VALUE).
We had the same issue sometime back and we applied the patch. I have the patch but it will be a huge file to send over internet. See the above notes and you should be able to apply the required patch.
Also check Note
Note 696069 below:
Summary
Symptom
No Data is displayed when View is changed from ALV to Excel Inplace on
ALV Grid. This Happens with Office XP/2003/2007.
Other terms
Excel inplace, Excel, ALV, Office 2003, Office XP, office 2007
Reason and Prerequisites
With newer release of MS Office (XP/2003/2007) Microsoft added new security settings/options for Visual Basic project and Macros. Excel Inplace uses Visual Basic Project and macro functionality of MS Office. If the setting for Macro security is High (which automatically disables macro or if access to Visual Basic Project is suppressed then Excel Inplace doesn't show any Data in Excel.
Solution
Required settings in MS office XP and MS Office 2003:
To use the Excel Inplace functionality make sure the security settings for Macro is set to Medium and the option "Trust access to Visual Basic Project" must be checked on Tools->Macro->Security->Trusted Sources tab.
Required settings in Office 2007:
Please see the video file in attachments of this note.
This is required with MS Office XP, MS Office 2003, MS Office 2007.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 22.12.2006 14:47:01
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: BC-FES-OFFI SAP Desktop Office Integration
Secondary Components: BC-FES-XXL XXL List Viewer/Lotus Connections
Reward points if this help
Sanghamitra
Message was edited by:
        Sanghamitra11

Opening Balance in Customer Aging report

Hi Gurus,
I am making the Customer aging report am facing a problem in the calculation of 'opening balance'.
If the opening balance has to done by using routines how to do it.
I am using the 0FI_AR_4 datasource.
I am getting Debit amount , Credit amount , and Balance. They can be seen in R/3 in the
Tcode: FD10N.
the balance must be calculated with the previous balance.
How to write the routine / what logic must be used . If you have the code please paste it
here or send to: [email protected]
regards
Edited by: man man on Jan 16, 2008 11:04 AM

Hi,
I am making a report for the Customer Aging.
using the keyfigures 'Debit'(Collections), 'Credit'(Sales), 'Balance'
and the characteristics 'G/L Account', 'Customer'.
I want all the above infoobjects in the report.
regards,
man

Discrepancy between Balance sheet and Aging report

HI Experts,
I have a client who run the AR Aging and Balance sheet monthly for as their month end procedures.
They have found the following:
When the Balance Sheet and Aging report is run on the same day this shows the same on the Accounts Receivable and the Aging report.
When the Aging is run a few days after the month end, and the Aging Date is selected as 05/01/2010, the Posting Date untill is also 05/01/2010, the Balance Sheet To date is 05/01/2010 I get discrepancies between the 2 amounts.
I looked for documents with later Posting/Document dates but could not find any in the aging report.
Any help would be welcome.
Marli

Hi Marli,
You may check these threads:
Re: Mismatch in Accounts Receivable Balance and A/R Aging Balance due
Re: customer aging query - show balance as of a specific date
Thanks,
Gordon

BP Balance not showing correctly in Aging report

Good Day all B1 experts,
We are converting to SAP B1 for fiscal year 2010 and earlier today I have found a problem with BP balance on the AR side. Below is a summary of the problem:
Problem:
- For some BP, after I entered opening balances, their total outstanding AR balance was not reflected in the Aging report, nor can be found in the Opening Balance window (under System Initialization).
- However, A/R control General Ledger account is correct and ties to my Year End 2009 Financial Statements
Attempted Solution:
- I reentered the "missing" opening balance for those BP accounts. After entering the numbers, however, the Aging report shows a DOUBLED amount of the correct balance. And when I go check the Opening Balance window, the system is showing the correct BP balance (NOT Doubled).
- Now my A/R control General Ledger and Opening Balance General Ledger Account is out of balance as well. The difference equals to the amount I reentered.
Has anyone encountered similar problem before? I cannot think of anything I did to cause such mess. In any case, I am wondering if I need to use the Restore BP function.
Please provide me some guidance on this. Thanks!!!
BR,
Sunny

Good Morning Kerstin,
Thank you for the article. The version that we are using is 2007A (8.00.180) SP:00 PL:45
In the article, it mentioned about the Single Reconciliation Engine. Do you know if that tool comes along with previous upgrades, or we will have to download and install it?
Actually it seems for one of those problem BP accounts, the correct balance is reflecting on the Aging Report after an invoice was issued yesterday. However, its BP balance is still not correctly reflecting elsewhere (such as Incoming Payment under banking module.)
Regards,
Sunny

Aging Report display

Version: (Please provide the current version)
SBO 8.8 Patch: 10
Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
In mentioned patch level, the result/outstanding balance of Aging Report in System Currency was difference when selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' or not. The outstanding balance should be be same on both selection.
Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable)
N/A
Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
If the Aging Report cannot disppay the outstanding documetns for reconcile with customer, they cannot check with customers.
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
Generate the Aging report in System Currency
selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' including all transactions and balance is same as Trail Balance
un-selected 'Display Receoncilied Transactions' does not inclding the transactions that Local Currency is zero amount, but System Currency is not zero. The outstanding balance is different to the result of the above selection and Trail Balance as well.
Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
Print the Aging Report with selected ' Display Reconcilied Transactions' to show ALL transactions to reconcile the transactions.
Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
selected 'Display Reconciled Transactions' or not, the outstanding balance should be the same.

Hi Kit,
The problem was not solved yet, even I posted DFQ.
Best regards,
Michael

Reconcile Delivary Balances - Aging Report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for