Reconciliation Tool

Do you know of any third party tool that SAP has partnered with for non-bank and (in most cases non-FI) reconciliation. This is for reconciling detail level transaction in legacy systems ?
This is for a retail type industry.Only Summarized data is posted in SAP.

Hello,
We are trying to upload a file with process 003. We can upload the file without any problem but see that the customer/vendor information is not populated. We use the standard structure FBICRC_S_UPLOAD and we used the file structure delivered by note 1154899.
Can you please let me know what needs to be corrected?
Thx,

Similar Messages

HFM as a reconciliation tool?

Hi everyone,
I am aware that HFCM is a tool from Oracle for performing recon but what if I want to use HFM as a recon tool?..any thoughts on this concept...?...
Any and every reply would be really appreciated...
Thanks
Edited by: 999954 on Apr 14, 2013 7:46 AM

The flat file that results from the EA Extract is huge and takes a Long time to load back into FDM. Is there a way that we could do this process without having to make that script?
Yes, after considering your requirement we can very well create the star schema and load the same to Essbase
OR, could we simply bypass FDM in the second round? Since my goal is to get the HFM-EA extract to Essbase/Planning, do I even need FDM here?
You can very well skip the FDM. To load data into Essbase, we can do Essbase Analytics for Aggregate Storage. If it's Block Storage you MUST create a Query to extract the data from Schema and load data to Essbase.
I.e. transfer the HFM Extended Analytics data to Essbase Analytics database ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intercompany reconciliatin tool. Upload file

Hello,
We are testing intercompany reconciliation tool in process 003, customer and vendor open items.
We are trying to upload a file in tc FBICS3, for intercompany reconciliation and we cant upload a line with a negative amount. The file has the same structure than FBICRC_S_UPLOAD.
The intercompany reconciliation tool works fine if we upload a positive amount and documents are reconciled but it doesnt work with negative amounts.
We have tried to write a negative amount and we obtain a sap error in the file format, we tried to change the account type using vendor(V) and client (D) in this field (FBICRC_S_UPLOAD-ATYPE) but sap always upload a positive amount in the system.
This is a line of our testing file that is uploaded in structure FBICRC_S_UPLOAD:
HU01 LU07 1800000141 C DLU07 EUR 123
We will appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance!

Hello,
We are trying to upload a file with process 003. We can upload the file without any problem but see that the customer/vendor information is not populated. We use the standard structure FBICRC_S_UPLOAD and we used the file structure delivered by note 1154899.
Can you please let me know what needs to be corrected?
Thx,

FI and FM reconciliation

When the reconciliation analysis report is generated, there is a difference (in negative). Please provide me an explanation as to the cause of the difference and the possible solutions from FI and FM reconciliation tool perspective. Thanks.

Hi,
FM is not subsidiary of FI, therefore reconciliation between them is not obvious and depends on specific definitions made in FM update profile, budget consumption logic, etc. For example, you might have entries in FI with no FM documents (only update in totals) and, on the contrary, you can have consumption in FM (e.g. PO, EMF, etc.) with no impact on FI. Only if you use budgetary ledger functionality in FM, the reconciliation becomes more structured. Otherwise, you have to perform complete analysis of your postings in FM and take(or exclude) some entries depending on your customization.
Regards,
Eli

File Layout for ICR Tool (Process 003)

Does anybody know how to obtain the correct field layout for manually uploading data to the SAP Inter-company Reconciliation tool?

Ralph Stadter can you please advice with above question.
Thanks

Intercompany reconciliaton tool

Some of you can give me some information related to 'intercompany reconciliation tool'.
It must be bought? Or they are programs already in SAP?
Could you please briefly describe me the functionality.
Thanks.
Elena

Hi Elena,
Kindly refer to the following link:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3042cb59-ef10-2c10-1e84-d29bde763c52?QuickLink=index&…
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Harin M. Khakhkhar

FI and COPA

Hi,
I'm reconciling the FI vs COPA.
The billing document type RE and G2 values are posting directly to COPA. There are no values in FI. Where should I start my research.

Not sure how complicated your COPA setup is, but for pretty basic setups, the transaction KEAT promises to be a good reconciliation tool.
Cheers.

Implication of not having EBS structure and clearing accounts

Hi,
In-House Cash(IHC) utilizes clearing accounts and Electronic Bank Statements (EBS) structure, however, we are contemplating to introduce an external reconciliation tool which reconciles bank accounts with GL directly and hence omit utilization of EBS and clearing accounts. This will require a non standard SAP configuration for IHC.
We would like to seek the opinion of the experts here on the potential impact of not using EBS and clearing accounts on IHC and other SAP functionality to help us better assess our options.
Looking forward to hear your advice. Thank you.
Regards,
Alvin Lim

Are the concentration account and the 4 ZBA accounts all assigned to the same company code? If so, then yes, you can handle clearing of ZBA postings within EBS.
The key to the clearings is that the posting type 1 (post) transactions have to post before the posting type 5 (clear) transactions. EBS posts the statements in the order that they come through in the bank statement file. So if, for example, the 1st statement in the file contains the incoming ZBA (posting type 5) transaction and the 2nd statement in the file has the outgoing ZBA (posting type 1), the incoming ZBA postings will not clear because at the time the 1st statement is processed, becuase the outgoing ZBA transaction from the 2nd statement have not posted.
Where in the file is the concentration account? Is it before the ZBA accounts? After the ZBA accounts? You may need to adjust your configuration based on the order of the accounts in the file.
Also, does the concentration account normally have just incoming ZBA transactions, just outgoing ZBA transactions or both incoming and outgoing ZBA transactions? If the concentration account has both incoming ZBA and outgoing ZBA transactions, then you may need to assign the posting rules differently to the concentration account than to the ZBA accounts. For example, if the concentration account is the 1st account in the statement, then both 581 and 281 should be assigned to posting rules with posting type 1 (post) - and the ZBA accounts should have 581 and 281 assigned to posting rules with posting type 5 (clear). If the concentration account is last in the file, then the configuration would be just the opposite - the concentration account would have all posting type 5 posting rules and the ZBA accounts would be posting type 1.
Also, if you plan to use one clearing GL account, you'll need to make sure to fully specify that account in the account symbol configuration - do not use any masking.
Regards,
Shannon

Reconciliation data quality management tools

When you start out a new IDM implementation project or when you expand the scope of an IDM solution in an organization one of the problems you are always faced with is to determine the data quality in the already present identity data. Is the primary key that you think you can use actually present in every record? If not in every record how many records lacks it? Are there any primary key collisions? How are the secondary attributes?
In theory you could connect your OIM instances, configure the recon and see what results you get but in many cases you want quick, simple answers and configuring the whole recon process is not always quick and easy. I have mostly been using Excel or a separate database and Java/Sql to do the transformations.
Has anyone found a good tool to do this kind of work?
Thanks
/Martin

In any case, there is SAP Master Data Governance for Financial Data as an out-of-the box application on top of SAP ERP when it comes to centrally creating master data (such as chart of accounts). See the following [blog|/people/andreas.seifried/blog/2010/05/05/governance-for-financial-master-data].
Regards,
Markus

Reconciliation to verify data in R/3 and BW

Hi Experts,
Can any one explain me how we will maintain reconciliation to verify the data in SAP R/3 and SAP BW are same or not after the data loads. Please explain all the sources that we have.
Thanks in advance
Mallik

For Unit Test, you don't need to reconcile all the records. So, I take a couple of selections. Using these, go to RSA3 in R/3 and extract the data and take sub-totals in Excel.
Now, go to Info Provider in BW, and using same selections, download the data in BW or BEx and take sub-totals again and compare both.
If the extractor is generic extractor based on View/Tables, you can go one additional step and get data from SE16 in R/3 to make sure RSA3 and Tables also match.
For Business Content extractor, its a little difficult is do this step because most of them are Function Modules.
This should be enough as long as your selections are good.
You can compare the data from RSA3. Run RSA3 and save the data in a file and then compare with BW.
You can compare the PSA data with R/3 to check whether your data transport is correct.But its very much important the end result (with data in Data Targets ex.Infocube...) should be reconciled with the R/3 data to check your update and transfer rules are working fine.
The second part is too tricky since you cannot directly compare the reports while the formats and grouping are different.
You can execute the reports in R/3 and apply the Update and transfer conversions (at least for random records) then reconcile with the BW data.
Take a look on the note: 543188
"How to Reconcile Data Between SAP Source Systems and SAP NetWeaver BI"
The Data Reconciliation procedure is still in the SAP action item for the future release.
But we can reconcile the data by extracting the reports and compare with the query output in Excel sheet.
Please check for a tool "Excel Compare" in google which is really useful in comparing excel files.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
By this method you can compare your infocube data with PSA ones...clearly, every changes in R/3 (due to user exit or, above all, BW-specific standard logic) is not taken into account...if you want to consider also this part (back-end), there is no std method and it depends from every specific flow!
also check in service.sap.com/bi
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
One way is to define Remote Cube on the R3 data source and create multiprovider on BW with the Remote Cube and the BW target. Subtract the KF on R3 from the KF in BW - anything not 0 becomes an exception.
Sometimes the source on R3 is not as straight forward and we have had ABAP developers create summary table on R3 to compare to BW.
Actually one to one Data comparison between R/3 and BW is done during Integration Test phase. During this time we need to sit with R/3 team and work closely because they know exactly the numbers in R/3 side and which tables Data resides and all. After loading Data same data in to BW we compare the numbers between R/3 BW. If both the teams feel there is some data missing then we start the analysis. As a first stem we will see in the extractors then BW side during transformation like transfer and update rules.
Pleases see this document for more help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/968dab90-0201-0010-c093-9d2a326969f1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
verifying the data which is coming from R/3 to BW system. That is called as Reconciliation.
That process is done with v lookup functionality.
Hope this helps and assihn points, if so
Regards
Raja

Bank Statement for Reconciliation

Dear All,
What is the disadvantage if we can use Electronic Bank Transfer for Bank Reconciliation.
There are two main obstacles in Customizing to quick and efficient installation of the electronic bank statement:
Creating the files UMSATZ.TXT and AUSZUG.TXT is a complex process. Experience has shown that many implementation errors arise from incorrect creation (format errors) of these files. Using actual files from the bank is also difficult as the files are usually very big.
The open items to be found and cleared using the electronic bank statement must usually be entered into the (test) system manually and with correct clearing information. This information must also exist in the correct fields in the individual line items in the UMSATZ.TXT file (for example in the note to payee fields).
The above information provided in Electronic Bank Statement Implementation Tool as per Best Practice document.
Also understand that many obstacles and other problems faced by many implementation.
Is Manual Bank Statement uploading is advisable ?
Reuqest your help and guidelines.
Regards,
SS

Hi Ravi Teja / Experts,
Thanks for your info and link.
I have already these configuration document.
My question is If we implement Electronic Bank Statement - What is the advantage & disadvantage?
Is it Manual Bank Statement is advisable?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
SS

Po Accrual Reconciliation report

Hi Sir
Hope you are doing well and good.
I am new to R12 PO. For my client in 11.5.10.2 they have customized Po Accrual Reconciliation report. I came to know that in R11 they use view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP and temporary table used in that view is PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL.
Now we are migrating this report to R12 and the above view was obsolete synonym in R12.
1) After checking thoroughly i came to that temporary table was replaced with CST_AP_PO_RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY in R12. And i am unable to found view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP replacement in R12. Can you please help me in this regard.
2) Using the two new tables:CST_AP_PO_
RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY, can we modify the query to get the same output as like R11
This is very very urgent request.
Best Regards
Mani

This is the forum for the SQL Developer tool. You need to ask your question in an eBusiness suite forum.

Reconciliation Report Clarification Needed

Their is a report named "Locate Reconciliation in Bank Statement by Row Number" Under: Banking -> External Reconciliation.
In Query-Selection Criteria -> Visual Order (What is this?) and how to add account number in the list. As I can only see couple of accounts. Please advice.

Hi Paul,
Though we dont have a crystal Report for what you are looking at but I think our add-on Bank Reconciliation Inquiry would be a helpful tool. The add-on has a screen with some fields like GL Bank Account, Statement No, Statement Date and lower half is bifurcated into two sections column wise which shows in Section 1
<<Section 1- Values in Books>>
GL Balance
+Positive Adjustments
Sub Total
-Negative Adjustments
Ending GL Balance
In section 2
<<Section 2 - Values in Bank statement>>
Cleared With./Chks.
Cleared Inc./Dpsts..
Balance on Statement
+Out Standing Deposits
Sub Total
-Out Standing Checks
Ending Balance
Difference The difference between GL Ending Balance and Bank Statement Ending Balance is shown.
Anyway, I think this already getting a bit too complicated to inform about the add-on over this forum but I think this add-on would satisfy the requirement which you have presently. If you have an interest and would like to know more, please contact us off forum for detailed feature list and white paper for the add-on. There are more features coming up than just the above defined ones like list of all cleared/un-cleared deposits/payments/Adjustment each on a tab with further drill down facility!
Regards,
Cheers,
Nits
Manager - SAP Business One
G r e y t r i x
It's time to think outside the box.
Migration, Integration, Customization and Modification Solutions
E-mail: sap at greytrix.com
Web: [www.greytrix.com|www.greytrix.com]

Reconciliation report template

Has anyone developed a proper bank reconciliation report template either through Crystal or through XL Reporter that shows
General Ledger $X,XXX,XXX
Balance Per Bank $XX,XXX
Plus O/S Deposits $XX,XXX
Less O/S Cheques $X,XXX
Total Reconciled Balance per Bank: $x,xxx,xxx
I appreciate your time,
Paul Jasek

Hi Paul,
Though we dont have a crystal Report for what you are looking at but I think our add-on Bank Reconciliation Inquiry would be a helpful tool. The add-on has a screen with some fields like GL Bank Account, Statement No, Statement Date and lower half is bifurcated into two sections column wise which shows in Section 1
<<Section 1- Values in Books>>
GL Balance
+Positive Adjustments
Sub Total
-Negative Adjustments
Ending GL Balance
In section 2
<<Section 2 - Values in Bank statement>>
Cleared With./Chks.
Cleared Inc./Dpsts..
Balance on Statement
+Out Standing Deposits
Sub Total
-Out Standing Checks
Ending Balance
Difference The difference between GL Ending Balance and Bank Statement Ending Balance is shown.
Anyway, I think this already getting a bit too complicated to inform about the add-on over this forum but I think this add-on would satisfy the requirement which you have presently. If you have an interest and would like to know more, please contact us off forum for detailed feature list and white paper for the add-on. There are more features coming up than just the above defined ones like list of all cleared/un-cleared deposits/payments/Adjustment each on a tab with further drill down facility!
Regards,
Cheers,
Nits
Manager - SAP Business One
G r e y t r i x
It's time to think outside the box.
Migration, Integration, Customization and Modification Solutions
E-mail: sap at greytrix.com
Web: [www.greytrix.com|www.greytrix.com]

IPM - Reconciliation Report

Hello Friends,
Is there a way to to create reconciliation report mapping image flow from ODC TO OFR TO IPM. Our client is looking forward this report to track the invoice movement.
Please advice if someone tried this in the past.
Cheers,
KK Chopra

Hi Paul,
Though we dont have a crystal Report for what you are looking at but I think our add-on Bank Reconciliation Inquiry would be a helpful tool. The add-on has a screen with some fields like GL Bank Account, Statement No, Statement Date and lower half is bifurcated into two sections column wise which shows in Section 1
<<Section 1- Values in Books>>
GL Balance
+Positive Adjustments
Sub Total
-Negative Adjustments
Ending GL Balance
In section 2
<<Section 2 - Values in Bank statement>>
Cleared With./Chks.
Cleared Inc./Dpsts..
Balance on Statement
+Out Standing Deposits
Sub Total
-Out Standing Checks
Ending Balance
Difference The difference between GL Ending Balance and Bank Statement Ending Balance is shown.
Anyway, I think this already getting a bit too complicated to inform about the add-on over this forum but I think this add-on would satisfy the requirement which you have presently. If you have an interest and would like to know more, please contact us off forum for detailed feature list and white paper for the add-on. There are more features coming up than just the above defined ones like list of all cleared/un-cleared deposits/payments/Adjustment each on a tab with further drill down facility!
Regards,
Cheers,
Nits
Manager - SAP Business One
G r e y t r i x
It's time to think outside the box.
Migration, Integration, Customization and Modification Solutions
E-mail: sap at greytrix.com
Web: [www.greytrix.com|www.greytrix.com]

Reconciliation Tool

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for