Reg: WorkItem &  Mail Inbox Problem for Multiple users In workflow

Hi,
I have developed a wofkflow application to sent SAP mails and Workitems to multiple users. I Have a Container which has the property as multi line. and i mapped this container variable with expression of my mail step. This means i can send multiple mails at the sae time....Its working Fine. But the problem is,
Suppose I am sending mails to User1 & User2. Both are receiving the mail, But if user1 read the mail user2 mail is set as read document instead of unread doucument.....
How to Solve this? any solution ?

Hi
See if this document is of any help to you.
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c6456e89-0a01-0010-0189-a7961fe42034">An expert guide to new SAP workflow capabilities</a>
Regards,
Raj

Similar Messages

  • Send Mail to External Mail ID's for Multiple Users

    Hi All,
    I want to send mail from SAP to External mail ID's for multiple Users.The program is ok.
    But I want to send this to Multiple external Mail id's. Where should I assign this receivers list. Pls advise.
    What is the transaction to assign multiple receivers.?
    CALL FUNCTION 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1'
          EXPORTING
            DOCUMENT_DATA              = GD_DOC_DATA
            PUT_IN_OUTBOX              = 'X'
            COMMIT_WORK                = ''
          TABLES
            PACKING_LIST               = IT_PACKING_LIST
            CONTENTS_TXT               = IT_MESSAGE
            RECEIVERS                  = IT_RECEIVERS
          EXCEPTIONS
            TOO_MANY_RECEIVERS         = 1
            DOCUMENT_NOT_SENT          = 2
            DOCUMENT_TYPE_NOT_EXIST    = 3
            OPERATION_NO_AUTHORIZATION = 4
            PARAMETER_ERROR            = 5
            X_ERROR                    = 6
            ENQUEUE_ERROR              = 7
            OTHERS                     = 8.
    Thank You.
    Pranitha.

    IT_RECEIVERS parameters needs to be passed as shown below.
        wa_receivers-receiver = "..........External mail id".
        wa_receivers-rec_type = 'U'.
        wa_receivers-express = 'X'.
        APPEND wa_receivers TO lt_receivers.
        CLEAR  wa_receivers.
    Once mail is triggered to the external mail id's, check the mail is transferred from SAP or not using the tcode SCOT.
    In SCOT,follow the path UTILITIES-> Overview of send orders.
    Regards,
    Satish Kanteti

  • PC Convert - Configuring Mail & Best Practices for Multiple Users

    I finally came to the light side last night. I bought an iMac and now I'm trying to figure out how to best set it up for use by me and my wife. Our PC is set up with a single login account and I've created multiple Outlook (not Express) profiles, one for her and one for me.
    Can I do the same thing on the iMac? Am I better off creating multiple login accounts and just keeping everything separate? Being new, I would rather set things up the right way the first time and not have to undo things due to my lack of experience with iMac.
    Thanks!

    Hello,
    Welcome to the Discussions, and welcome to Macs!
    If you each wish not to see the email messages of the other, then your only real choice is to set up separate User Accounts (what you are calling login accounts). Of course using a single User Account, you can set both email accounts up in Mail, and if you keep the Inbox and Sent mailboxes expanded to show the separate Inbox (and Sent) for each account, then that works pretty well. It will not distinguish New Mail without looking in the the Inbox -- the red dot in the Dock will not separate for whom new mail has arrived. But the Address Book will be the same and shared.
    The advantage of multiple User Accounts is that the entire Dock can be customized for the applications each of you like to use, if they are different.
    The disadvantage will be in not sharing will include not sharing the Address Book, music and photo libraries, etc.
    Ernie

  • Flash install problem for multiple users

    Working on an home PC trying to set up Flash. Go through
    install logged in as myself (systemadmin access) and install goes
    fine. Flash pages load on IE Other users on system, also Admin
    access, can not get same Flash pages to load. Running WinXp. Have
    tried both IE 6 and 7. Firefox is running fine for all users
    Thanks for any help you can provide

    During install, you should be prompted whether you want to install the loops for the current user only or for every user. In the latter case, the loops should end up in HD/Library/Audio/Apple Loops

  • Can we creat an Apple ID for multiple users?

    I work for a company where we are rolling out iPads in big amounts. The problem is that they all need an Apple ID in the training they get about the iPad they receive because they have to install MobiControl on it.
    It's no problem to let them create an Apple ID at home, but they have to fill in credit card numbers once they connect at work when they try to install apps. That's the problem... Not everyone want's or has credit cards...
    Maybe it's possible to create an Apple ID for multiple users???
    Thanks!

    iPad in Business and Education
    You may find a better answer in this part of the forum, since it's meant for situations like you're in.
    http://www.apple.com/support/appleid/
    is also info about apple ID's.
    You can make apple ID's without a credit card, you just have to jump through a couple of hoops to do it since the default is that people will always give a credit card. The key to making an ID without a credit card is that you try to download a free app first, then follow the 'make an ID' prompt. That will get you the 'none' option for payment.

  • Setting up accounts for multiple users

    Suggestions for allowing multiple users to access one account to avoid having to reimburse folks for every download on their work iPads?

    short answer, no. Mail.app does not have support within itself for multiple user accounts. It displays the messages from the mailboxes of the user that is currently logged in. so if you want multiple people to read their mail on the same mac without being able to read other users' mail, you will need to set up multiple user accounts. alternatively, use another client. i think thunderbird supports multiple mail accounts under the same user account. hope this helps.

  • Mail rules work for some users, don't work for others

    Ready to pull my hair out over this one:
    Leopard to Snow Leopard upgrade went uneventfully, except for the fact that server-side mail rules (accessed via browser at FQDN -> Mail Rules) work for several users (two, to be exact) and don't for the rest (about 15 or so).
    The usual culprits have been reviewed: 'Enable Server-Side Mail Rules' is checked in Mail -> Settings -> Filters, 'Allow users to configure server-side mail rules' is checked in Web -> Sites -> Web Services, users can create vacation notices and email rules without issue via browser, permissions look fine on the contents of /Library/Email Rules and /var/spool/imap/dovecot/sieve-scripts, logs give no indication of any foul play (at least the Email Rules -> debug.log generates the same entries for both functional and non-functional users), etc.
    I have noticed that /var/spool/imap/dovecot/sieve-scripts contains only two items, which - you guessed it - line up with the GUIDs of the two functional users. Theoretically every user with a rule should be represented here.
    As suggested in this thread:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11171395&#11171395
    I created both a vacation notice and an email rule for several users, thinking that may force the folder creation for those users, but no dice. I even manually created folders for a few users with their GUIDs as the folder names and assigned each user ownership and read/write access. Still nothing. Created a few new test user accounts just to rule out any legacy account weirdness (although it's worth noting that I completely redid the OD and recreated user accounts after the upgrade) and replicated the problem with these, as well. Lastly, used Inspector to compare OD attributes between functional and non-functional accounts, with no glaring differences.
    Help!

    Did you find an answer? I encounter the same problem on my new MiniServer. Deleted and created all users several times, but just for some accounts mail is working.
    Do you have the answer?
    (new to this site, read a lot already, but not found)

  • SESSION VARIABLES : HOW TO TEST FOR MULTIPLE USERS

    I have a username session variable set up on a localhost testing envirnoment.
    This works fine for one user, but when I open another occurence of the browser (or just another tab) to test for multiple users the system overwrites the session variable with the last username input.
    So the question is:
             Why doesn't dreamweaver hold an instance of the session variable for each browser session? and if not what are your suggestions?
    Thanks
    Adam.

    Thanks for that.
    After scouring the internet I found the only way of running 2 instances of firefox  without them sharing the session variables is to create 2 new firefox profiles in windows + set the MOZ_NO_REMOTE environment variable.
    Internet explorer is much easier as it has a 'new session' option in the file menu, but seems to have more trouble displaying tables correctly.
    Hope this helps anyone with a similar problem.

  • Call for adobe form is going for dump for multiple users

    hi,
    i am calling an adobe form in a program i.e. for multiple users. now my problem is.....
    3 people are using same tcode to generate the adobe form output for different data. but when they click at a time on the button to generate the adobe output, then adobe form is coming for only one user and it is going for dump for other users.
    and this dump is coming because of exception "CX_FP_API_INTERNAL" in funtion module FP_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME which i am using to get the function module name of the adobe form in my program.
    can u please give me some solution to rectify this issue....

    That's nothing!
    An engineer and I contacted Adobe technical support by phone to ensure the PC I was having custom built was configured to its optimum. They advised XP64 as the best operating environment. After that discussion we had to completely revise procurement, etc to get the bits and compatible XP64 compatible software, putting the build project back a few weeks as well, Imagine how I laughed when I found out on one of these forums that XP64 is the worst choice and totally unsupported by CS4!
    I have written to Shantanu Narayen, Adobe CEO and didn't even get an acknowledgement I raised this last week on the Adobe stand at BVE and was told they'd get someone to contact me asap but guess what, niet...! To be fair there has been one Adobe executive that recognises the problem and the damage poor customer support is causing the company; he has been as helpful as he can. Unfortunately, it seems the overall Adobe culture at the top is "get the money and run". If your problem goes beyond what's already on their web pages, tough luck!
    Regards,
    Graham

  • WebStart Single Install for multiple users

    Has anyone figured out how to solve the problem of having to install the software for multiple users now?
    With recent versions of the Sun WebStart, the cache directory has changed to the user's personal directory.
    It used to be that the cache directory was a common shared directory off the C: drive.
    For the software we have developed, it was great to install once as the admin, download the files so that they are cached, and then copy the links to the all users desktop which pointed at that shared location.
    Now there appears to be no way to do this. We've looked to find the default cache location to change it, but there is no way to specify this (that we've found).
    I know I can change each user's cache directory to point to a common location, but it means signing on as each user and making this change manually which takes a considerable more time than it did before. Java WebStart was the EASY way to install the software before (and did not require a browser). Now it is harder than just using a browser with the plugin. We'd like to get the browser out of the picture though still.
    I can see how this feature could benifit individual users who only want their own programs to show up , but we really need to make it work like before for ease of use. With the number of users we are dealing with, it would be very difficult to tell them to click on a link to install the program but only do that the first time, then start using the new link that is created by the program.
    Any suggestions from anyone?

    Sorry, I just realized this is in the wrong forum.
    I'll go post it in a more correct forum instead.

  • Best way to set up a Mac laptop for multiple users with AD logins

    I am setting up a MacBook Pro running 10.4.11 that will be used as a "loaner" notebook for meetings, etc. The computer will be used internally at our company, so users will be logged into our network. Active Directory is set up on this computer to allow all domain users to log in using their own user name and password; this approach helps meet our company's security standards (we want to avoid using one common login or account for all users).
    While this approach seems to fit our needs, it causes problems when it comes to running applications. For instance, each new user is prompted to enter first-time usage information when launching an application (forcing them to contemplate registration information, various settings, etc.). I've given "everyone" read-write privileges to the HD > Library and the Applications folder, but this does not solve anything and may not be a good approach anyway.
    I would welcome any advice on the best way to set up this computer for multiple users logging in via Active Directory. Thanks!

    Where are you installing the third party applications? It sounds like they are being installed in the 'User 1' account, rather than the /Applications folder (admin or not, one user normally can not see into another user's folders). Repairing permissions only works for applications that have a file in /Library/Receipts, not on folders in general, so you would need to check the permissions for the folders in question.

  • Getting mail authentication errors for outlook user sending mail

    When Outlook 2010 user attempts to use port 587 to send mail (to himself at this point), we see the following in the server logs:
    (User in question can attach to file shares on the same server just fine from his Windows laptop)
    Outlook config for outbound server is "port: 587, encryption TLS"
    When we connect, we get "connection interrupted by server"
    Tried other encryption methods - outlook 2010 states that server does not support the other methods (None, SSL)
    SMTPD Logs
    Jul 29 22:22:58 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2306]: connect from <Outlook Client Name>[<Outlook ClientAddr>]
    Jul 29 22:22:58 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2306]: error: validate response: error: Authentication server failed to complete the requested operation.
    Jul 29 22:22:58 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2306]: error: validate response: authentication failed for user=colin (method=DIGEST-MD5)
    Jul 29 22:22:58 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/master[1407]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 2306 killed by signal 6
    Jul 29 22:22:58 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/master[1407]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
    Jul 29 22:24:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2270]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Jul 29 22:24:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2270]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Meanwhile: Mac clients are able to connect to smptd submission port to send mail with no problems. Based on what the logs say, it appears that the Mac mail is using a different authentication mechanism.
    Client config for outbound server is "use custom port: 587, Use SSL:Checked, Authentication: MD5 Challenge-Response"
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2261]: connect from <Mac Client Name>[<MacClientAddr>]
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2261]: 721FCEC991: client=<Mac Client Name>[<MacClientAddr>], sasl_method=CRAM-MD5, sasl_username=<username>@l-n-l.com
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/cleanup[2267]: 721FCEC991: message-id=<[email protected]>
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/qmgr[1800]: 721FCEC991: from=<[email protected]>, size=573, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.compostfix/smtpd[2270]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2270]: E722AEC9A0: client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/cleanup[2267]: E722AEC9A0: message-id=<[email protected]>
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/qmgr[1800]: E722AEC9A0: from=<[email protected]>, size=994, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtp[2268]: 721FCEC991: to=<[email protected]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.55, delays=0.06/0.01/0.01/0.48, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as E722AEC9A0)
    Jul 29 22:19:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/qmgr[1800]: 721FCEC991: removed
    Jul 29 22:19:13 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/pipe[2273]: E722AEC9A0: to=<[email protected]>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.13, delays=0/0.01/0/0.12, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dovecot service)
    Jul 29 22:19:13 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/qmgr[1800]: E722AEC9A0: removed
    Jul 29 22:20:12 <servername>.l-n-l.com postfix/smtpd[2261]: disconnect from <Mac Client Name>[<MacClientAddr>]
    Running OS X 10.8.4 with Server 2.2.1.
    Any thoughts on what I need to do to make OSX Server mail play nice with Outlook over the submission port?
    Thanks in advance!!

    Ok - so I think I have it almost all sussed. So for all 3 of you who might be reading this, here is what is going on.
    1) As I expected, this has nothing to do with the FQDN/Outlook problem. I actually rejoiced when I finally got far enough to have that problem with my Outlook 2007 and 2010 clients. And I don't like the recommended fix for that either. There is another way - more on that in a minute.
    2) This problem was all about authentication methods. At present, I have OS X Mail Server set for plain text and APOP only. I will be working to fix this soon - but at present I am unable to find any other combination that permits both Mac Mail and Outlook clients to authenticate properly. Mac Mail wants to use CRAM-MD5 by default. Outlook is so incompatible with CRAM-MD5 that even when there are other authentication methods available on the mail server, if CRAM-MD5 is selected on the Server then Outlook fails miserably no matter how you configure the Outlook client. Caveat: this is my own observation and I still have some experimenting to do. If you know otherwise (or can confirm more definitively), then please speak up!
    So here is the working configuration at present:
       A) Mail Server authentication set to Custom with PlainText and APOP selected, all others blank.
       B) Firewall permits inbound from ports 25 (for mail from "outside"), 587 (submission for authenticated users, TLS) 993 (SSL IMAP), and 995 (SSL POP).
       C) Mac POP Clients:
          i) For retrieval (POP) In advanced settings, use Port 995, Check "Use SSL", Select APOP for authentication.
          ii) For submission (SMTP) : Set port 587 (only), Set Authentication to "Password"
        D) Outlook 2007,2010,2013 clients
           i) For retrieval (POP), Set "Require secure logon using SPA"
          ii) In "More Settings/Outgoing Server" set it to require authentication with same credentials as inbound
         iii) In "More Settings/Advanced"
             a) Turn on Encryption for the POP3, this should change the port to 995 automatically. If it does not, fix that too.
             b) Set outgoing server to 587
             c) Set TLS for the encryption type (nothing else will work here)
    Once you do 2.A, 2.B, 2.D, you will THEN, finally encounter the FQDN problem.
    3) So Apple and a lot of folks here in the forums resolve the FQDN problem by removing one of the restrictions:
        Remove "reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname" from "smtpd_helo_restrictions" in your postfix main.cf file.
    I have at least 2 problems with this:
       A) It removes yet another little bit of security from the setup
       B) It involves non-GUI changes to the config...which is dangerous if you use the GUI, as changes within the GUI will often result in overwrites to your changes outside the GUI. So you can easily lose this fix without being aware of it until one of your Outlook users starts screaming.
    The problem is really with Outlook and Windows not sending the FQDN in the first place. So how about we force them to do that instead? It turns out not to be too hard. I found a thread somewhere that goes into this and it works. Further, the solution remains on through reboots AND also can be made part of an automated deployment of a standard config. The only gotcha is you have to edit the registry...so you have to be careful. You only need to do this ONCE though, and the two entries are easy to find.
      C) Under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/CurrentControlSet/services/Tcpip/Parameters
           i) Set Hostname to the FQDN of your host (replace HOST with HOST.domain.com - or .net, or whatever)
          ii) Set NV Hostname to the FQDN of your host
          iii) Close Regedit and Reboot to have the changes take effect
    Once you do this, the FQDN problem for Outlook users goes away.
    So I am looking for suggestions to make the SMTP submission more secure. Aside from that, things are working - and I have had to make ZERO changes to config files outside of the Server GUI - a plus as far as I am concerned.

  • How to use the same POWL query for multiple users

    Hello,
    I have defined a POWL query which executes properly. But if I map the same POWL query to 2 portal users and the 2 portal users try to access the same page simultaneously then it gives an error message to one of the users that
    "Query 'ABC' is already open in another session."
    where 'ABC' is the query name.
    Can you please tell me how to use the same POWL query for multiple users ?
    A fast reply would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sandhya

    Batch processing usually involves using actions you have recorded.  In Action you can insert Path that can be used during processing documents.  Path have some size so you may want to only process document that have the same size.  Look in the Actions Palette fly-out menu for insert path.  It inserts|records the current document work path into the action being worked on and when the action is played it inserts the path into the document as the current work path..

  • Can I use one itunes account for multiple users and multiple devices

    Can I use one itunes account for multiple users and multiple devices?

    The iTunes EULA, as I understand it (I'm not an attorney )for Apps is basically that one person can use an App multiple devices, or multiple people can use an App one device..so one to many or many to one, but not many to many....

  • For multiple users on a computer, will Firefox Sync synchronize all the users on a computer or only the one logged on?

    For multiple users on a computer, will Firefox Sync synchronize all the users on a computer or only the one logged on? For instance my spouse and I will share a laptop and I want to sync my Firefox when I log on there also but do not want to sync her data.

    Curt
    how do you know if your using the
    Central cache all distributed cache ?
    and are they both stored in the same place ?

Maybe you are looking for