Rejection of goods movement type 122

hi experts
my requirment is print out the quantity os material returned back to the vendor based on movement type 122 along with
the reason for rejection using alv tree with oops.
plz any body help me which tables i have use.
if possible send the code.
thanks advance.
pasham.

Check the table.
MSEG Document Segment- Material
Field BWART Movement Type (Inventory Management)
Regards,
Maha

Similar Messages

Excise invoice created using J1IS and movement type 122

Hello
Can you please suggest whether we need to run J2IUN for the following process in order to show the debit entries in extracted RG23A PART2 register.
1. Returning the material with refernce to the original Goods receipt document (101) using MIGO movement type 122. Original GR document posted with capture and Post excise option.
2. Creaqting the Excise inoivce using J1IS with reference to material document created in Step 1
3. Releasing to accounting/ Posting the excise invoice in J1IV.
4. Extracting the Register RG23A PART 2 using J2I5
5. Print excise register using J2I6....But the debit entry not shown in register
Can you please confirm whether the debit entries in register will be updated after the Montly utilization J2IUN run ( as this process is a indirect sale process)
Please confirm
warm regards
Ramakrishna.

Hi Rama,
The accounting entries for 122 is as per standard.
for the excise invoice
Cenvat Clearing         Dr.
Cenvat Account        Cr.
for utilization
Cenvat payable          Dr.
Cenvat Account         Cr.
PLA Account              Cr.
and for MIRO it would be the standard.
you can refer the note 542862 for cin related accounting entries.
let me know if this helps you.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar
Edited by: adwait bachuwar on Dec 21, 2010 2:21 PM

Movement type 122 Error while GI" Update control of movement type is incorr

Hai Gurus,
I am having an errow when doing a GI thru movement type 122. i am getting this error message " Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 122 X X)" Can any one help me how to fix this.
I did this transaction using MIGO_GI and selecting Goods issued and other as the options with 122 as movement type.
warm regards.
mahesh.

Hi
Mov type 122 is return to vendor if the qualtiy of Goods is Poor / Quality
Regatds
AKM

FI Integration with movement type 122 - Return to vendor

Hello,
I have a problem with transactions MBRL, because movement type 122 (return to vendor) impact the 408xxx and not account 409xxx.
I checked the link between material group and valuation class (OLME), but in OBYC i don't know which transaction select ?
And, the valuation classe linked to that material group does not exist in any line in OBYC
Thanks

For 122 , GI happensds accounting entry is
Stocl Cr
Gr/IR Dr
It is opposite of Goods recipt . Please maintain BSX for stock with val class and WRX for Gr/Ir with val class.
IF freight also there check FR1 for the same . NO GBB off sett required .T code OByc
rewdzz

Movement type 122 & 161

What is the difference between Movement type 122 & 161?
Request to provide business process explanation also.
Regards,
Vengat

Hi Raghavan,
The basic diffrence between these two movemnt types is,
122: you can return material to the vendor when you know the PO number or GR number. The major advantage here for us is material get returned with same value when GR taken.
161: Returns PO, here we will retun the material by creating the PO with Returns flag.As soon as you take GR system returns the material with price given in the PO. Here system takes the price given in the Returns PO.
The business functinality of the both are, If you taken the 100 qty GR from the vendor and 80 got accepted and 20 rejected. Then it is advisable to go for 122.
But you have procured material from various vendors and 100 Gr qty only 1 pc got rejected and like that in case of other vendors. In cumulative you got some 30 pcs that are not usable. In that case you negotiate with any vendor to take that material at agreed price. In this case we go for Returns PO. Stock get returned with the agreed price.
Thanks,
Krishna Reddy

Movement type 122 - return delivery

Dear gurus,
I have material type FHMI-PRTS.
During return delivery with movement type 122, system shows following messages.
qty balances are not sufficient in the register
Pl. elaborate in details,
Regrds,
Devendra

Hi,
Check in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Incoming Excise Invoices > Specify Which Movement Types Involve Excise Invoices > Here check whether Movement Types are maintained.
Regards,
Manish

RTV user status - movement type 122

Hello,
We are trying to trigger RTV (Return To Vendor) user status
automatically from the movement type '122' and vice versa back to AVLB
with the reversal (movement type '123'). We tried to search for the SAP
standard business through the IMG for user status (IMG > Plant
Maintenance and Customer Service > Master Data in Plant Maintenance and
Customer Service > Basic Settings > Define User Status). The only
Business Transaction that does the automatic trigger is 'Goods Issues'.
However, we are already utilizing this 'Goods Issues' business
transaction for other user status. (ie. 'YARD'). Besides, it does not
make sense that Goods Issues will trigger RTV user status. Please
advise.
Thanks and regards,
Hendra Kosasih

Hi,
I think its not possible to assign 2 different user statuses for single document. As you are using one status already while doing goods issue, you cant assign another status simultaneously.
You try to create user fields & assign some value based on your requirement while posting the document.
regards,
Maheswaran.

Movement Type 122 and Equipment Master status

Using Movement type 102 (Reversal Goods Receipt) the Equipment master status is reset to
AVLB and the stock batch is deleted.
However movement type 122 (Return Delivery to Vendor) does not do this.
Is there anyway to modify movement type 122 so that it works like 102 ?
Regards.
Phil.

If it is a Return to vendor - 122 movement type transaction, the reason for the movement is that the equipment is defective or some issues are there and that is the reason it has been returned. Given 122 movement type is designed to reflect such a business scenario, how you are expecting that this should result in Equipment status to become AVLB.
So the question is why are you posting 122 if it is not real return due some defect ?

"Goods Movement type not possiable with mvmt type 261"

Dear All,
I am doing 541 movement with Service order combination, i have found following error,
"Goods Movement type not possiable with mvmt type 261"
Can you help me for this error.
-Reards,
Sunil

Getting errors while using PI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' with 561+K

Goods movement type for PM order

Dear experts,
In PM order we are using goods movement type 261 for goods issue.This movement type is attached to one package & made it defaulted for PM order. Now I want to have one more movement type 951 for my PM order for issuing the goods.
In brief I want one more option for issuing the goods.
Please note that i am using only MIGO for goods issue. The reservations will be automatically created while saving the order. we do not want to use manual reservation.
Please do the needful.
Thanks & best regards,
Praveen

Dear Thyagarajan,
Thanks for the response.
In IMG we are setting the movement type against the package(in my case IW01). where does it get connected to PM orders.There is a option of additional of many other packages too. how can system will come to know that it should pick only the specific package?
Please elaborate.
Thanks & best regards,
Praveen

ME23N - Movement type 122

HI Guys,
i have an order xxxx with a net price of 3,29 USD. now the warehous made the movement type 122 and in purch. order history i can see it.
now the issue is, i have a different amount between local amount and amount.
for me the local amount is EUR and the Amount is USD.
it seems that doing the movement type 122 the price 3,29 was taken in EUR and not in USD, how can i check this?
any suggestion?
thanks
C.

yes.
In the PO i have a material with net Price 3,29 USD. The warehouse made mov. type 122 with mb01 to return some of this material to the vendor (50 KG). now if i go to the po history i see movement type 122 quantity 50 amount 199,09 USD as you can see the price has changed.
i cannot find any document that state that the price has changed. in the fi documents related to that movement there is already 199,09 as amount.
can this be dependent to the moving avarage price?
can you please help me?
thanks
C.

Blocking Movement type 122 for T code MBRL

All SAP Gurus,
I want to block the movement type 122 for T code MBRL.
For this I used T code OMJJ, but here it is not showing MBRL as used T code.
If MBRL is not specified in OMJJ for 122, then how MBRL T- code is allowed for movement type 122.
Please give ur valuable inputs.
Regards,
Edited by: Rajan R. on May 19, 2008 10:22 AM
Edited by: Rajan R. on May 19, 2008 10:59 AM

Check the all authorization roles you have created for inventory management. In there you can take out MBRL from the list. Then, create a new role for transaction MBRL only, and then you can allow other movement types for this role except 122. Assgin this role to your users.
This is what I have done at two client locations.

Block Movement type 122 for T code MBRL

All SAP Gurus,
I want to block the movement type 122 for T code MBRL.
For this I used T code OMJJ, but here it is not showing MBRL as used T code.
If MBRL is not specified in OMJJ for 122, then how MBRL t code is allowed for movement type 122.
Please give ur valuable inputs.
Regards,
Edited by: Rajan R. on May 17, 2008 3:22 PM

Hi
Thanks for the reply
Now I want to block movement type 122 so that it can not be used throuh MRRL, is it posssible and how to do that?
I have alredy blocked MIGO for movement type 122
Edited by: Rajan R. on May 17, 2008 3:51 PM

Movement type 122

Hi,
For one of my PO, after doing GR/IR,my system allows material to send back vendor due to quality.I want to control it. How can I do that?
please any tips?
With Regards,
Jaheer

what do you actually want to control here
not allow the user to return to vendor using 122 movement type
then in transaction OMJJ select movement type 122 and select allowed transaction
delete the transaction you dont want the user to use
but be careful as it is a standard sap setting

New Goods Movement Type for Inventory Manager

Hi Guys,
I need to change a goods movement code used on Mobile App Inventory Manager 4.0 to a custom (Z) goods movement code, the fileds are the same so I thought changing the constant will work for this as we do a GoodReceipt with no reference to Purchase nor Production order (gmCode = 501) with a custom, copied from standard, Movement type gmCode = 950 (this is a well known practice on ERP). I have changed only the global constant on my copied IM application, for testing purpose and the local GR was created with gmCode = 950 instead of gmCode = 501, but when I was transmiting in order to create goods movement document on SAP, the application throws an error like: "PostReceiptsSteplet - Goods Movement Impossible with good movement type 950 - Server error". So I would like to know first:
If is it possible to include or change the standard gmCode for custom gmCode on mobile app Inventory Manager 4.0?
What would it be the Best Practice to do this? The steps to include a custom movement type, now I know is not only changes on global constants
I have checked the java doc for this method "PostReceiptsSteplet", and it did not say anything about the constructor .... or how is used... what has inside... what is the condition of execution.... nothing ...
Please Help... Mark Pe Stephen Streeter Jason Latko Omar Candelaria Manju Venkatesha
BR,
Mariana
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

Jason Latko
If those java source code are so troublesome to request... why should I request them if I won't change the app's base functionality??. Instead of requesting those java source code, the documentation of the java doc should improve, well the documentation in general for this app should improve ... Is only a suggestion ... I'm trying very hard not to ask for those source code, because what Mark Pe answer me on another post: If I ask for them, a disclamer must be signed because I could change a base functionality... and that's perfectly fine. But if I need to extend a class and add a few field: why do I need to ask for the code instead of checking the documentation and apply the customization needed?
Now I have some trouble extending a SAPOBJECT, because I don't quite understand the design of how you manage MaterialDocument / MaterialDocumentItem on the app. But I will post this question on another thread
BR & Always Thankful
Mariana

Rejection of goods movement type 122

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for