REM Planned Orders being generated with Order type LA instead of PE

Hi All,
I'm running the Repetitive Manufacturing scenario and when I execute the MRP run for my Planned Independent Requirements, Planned orders are automatically generated with the order type LA. I understand that for repetitive manuf., planned orders should have the order typ PE.
Is there something missing in config? How can I get the orders to be generated with the Order type PE??

HI,
Check the following settings which is required for REM
1. Master Data -
- Create Material master - MM01
-Create BOM - CS01
-Create rate Routing - CA21
Create Rem profile - SPRO ->Production planning -> Rem.Manuf->Control data or use existing one
Assign Bom seelction method = 2 & 3 (Prod version) in MRP view
Rem MFG indicator - mrp view in MM01.
Assign the REM profile to a material - MRP view in MM01.
create Valid Production version - MRP view in MM01 & Check Rem mfg ind
Assign the BOM and routings in Prod. Version
2.For Preliminary Cost Estimate:
Create version specific product cost collecter for Header material and preiminary cost estimate - KKF6N as per the settings in Rem profile. -
3 For standard cat Estimate.
create std Cost estimation(CK11n)
std cost Estimation Mark & release(CK24)
Thanks
Hrishi

Similar Messages

How do I get my ipod to play a playlist from reverse order? (Start with recently added song instead of first added)

How do I get my ipod to play a playlist from reverse order? (Start with recently added song instead of first added)
So I'm adding new songs to a very old playlist? Is there anyway that when I add them, they automatically go to top of playlist? How about getting one song to the top of a playlist. That drag to arrange function is very annoying because it is slow and the playlist does not scroll up very well on a PC.

Make a new playlist by pressing the little plus button at the very lower left corner of iTunes. An new playlist will appear in the Source pane called "untitled playlist". While the name is highlighted, you can change it to whatever you want. Drag all of the tracks from all the albums that comprise a single book to that playlist. Sync that playlist to your iPod.

Duplicate planned order is generated with one sales order item.

dear :
when the production order is confirmed with sales order item.the other new planned order is generated.
the requiremet quantity of sales order item is 1,but the custstock is 2 .display exception:26. in md04.
please help me analyze it .
best regards.

Hi
Please check rescheduling horizon in OPPQ(by default it would be 100).
May be you would have shifted the dates of production order after converting from planned order which had crossed rescheduled horizon. This would generate additional planned order to maintain initial dates.
If this is the case, increase Rescheduling horizon.
Regards,
Krishna Mohan

TRs are not being generated in Movement Type 261/262

Hi Gurus,
I am perfoming several material documents with movement type 261/262 and I don t know why in some cases the WM tab is generated without TR with only a storage bin.....so we don t have the possibility to take the TR and transform it into a TO....I have checked the configuration of the movement type in SPRO WM and everything seem to be OK, as usual....Any clue on this?
Many Thanks!!!!
Regards

Q1 : If I perform 261 in MIGO or in MB1A in a WM warehouse which It has NOT activated the PP-WM interface. the behavior will be the same ? - Yes, because selection of storage type and storage bin is from the control cycle which plays a major role if control cycle is not defined then system accepts standard 914 as destination storage type if control cycle is defined then it ignores standard SAP value and pick the storage type and bin from the control cycle.
Goods Issue w/ref. to the PP order will be created without TR and to a storage bin in Storage Type 100? and on the contrary, - Even if you do a Goods issue w/ref and control cycle is not defined then at the time of production order creation system update reservation table with blank entry under warehouse / storage type & storage bin and once you will do the MIGO for this system will consider 914 as storage type
if the control cycle is define then the value in RESB will be like below screen
if in this example I generate a 261 as Goods Issue Others the WM tab will have Intermediate Storage Type 914 and it will have a TR number?? ---Since this is without reference in the MIGO you will not find the Reservation tab and system will go with Standard SAP (914) storage type

AppManifest.xml is being generated with the wrong version number

I am having a interesting problem which is preventing me from submitting an update to my app to the Windows Phone Store. I have done this 100 times and something is wrong with visual studio building the .xap file. Steps I am taking:
Update all version references in project settings and appmanifestWM to 1.4.0.0
Build Release version
Copy .xap from /bin/release
Upload as an app update to windows phone dev site
What happens is that the current version of the app (1.3.1.0) is still listed as the version of the app that the submission page is parsing out of the version (1.4.0.0) .xap file. I unzipped the xap file and looked at the appmanifest files and found that
the AppManifest.xaml has the correct version number but the AppManifest.xml still has version 1.3.1.0. If anyone could help me resolve this issue it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your reply. I believe it is a bug with my solution because I have now tried all of these steps on two computers and uploaded using two different browsers and I still get a AppManifest.xml file that has version 1.3.1.0. I will copy and paste the
unzipped code from the AppManifest.xml file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Package xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2010/manifest" xmlns:m2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2013/manifest" xmlns:m3="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2014/manifest" xmlns:mp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2014/phone/manifest" xmlns:build="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/appx/2012/build" IgnorableNamespaces="build">

<Identity Name="50523CameronStair.MyDebts" Publisher="CN=FA4BA529-B82F-4A0F-A35C-6700BC51B3E1" Version="1.3.1.0" ProcessorArchitecture="neutral" />
<mp:PhoneIdentity PhoneProductId="c805a27c-951f-4c0d-a831-1126f9a70563" PhonePublisherId="51beaec0-db37-4002-81de-5e138a756b34" />
<Properties>
<DisplayName>MyDebtsApp</DisplayName>
<PublisherDisplayName>Cameron Stair</PublisherDisplayName>
<Logo>Assets\StoreLogo.png</Logo>
</Properties>
<Prerequisites>
<OSMinVersion>6.3.1</OSMinVersion>
<OSMaxVersionTested>6.3.1</OSMaxVersionTested>
</Prerequisites>
<Resources>
<Resource Language="EN-US" />
</Resources>
<Applications>
<Application Id="App" Executable="AGHost.exe" EntryPoint="MainPage.xaml">
<m3:VisualElements DisplayName="My Debts" Square150x150Logo="Assets\SquareTile150x150.png" Square44x44Logo="Assets\Logo.png" Description="A debt tracker app." ForegroundText="light" BackgroundColor="#464646" ToastCapable="false">
<m3:DefaultTile Square71x71Logo="Assets\SquareTile71x71.png"></m3:DefaultTile>
<m3:SplashScreen Image="Assets\SplashScreen.png" />
</m3:VisualElements>
<Extensions>
<Extension Category="windows.backgroundTasks" EntryPoint="AgHost.BackgroundTask">
<BackgroundTasks>
<Task Type="systemEvent" />
</BackgroundTasks>
</Extension>
</Extensions>
</Application>
</Applications>
<Extensions>
<Extension Category="windows.activatableClass.inProcessServer">
<InProcessServer>
<Path>AgHostSvcs.dll</Path>
<ActivatableClass ActivatableClassId="AgHost.BackgroundTask" ThreadingModel="both" />
</InProcessServer>
</Extension>
</Extensions>
<Capabilities>
<m3:Capability Name="contacts" />
</Capabilities>
<build:Metadata>
<build:Item Name="TargetFrameworkMoniker" Value="WindowsPhone,Version=v8.1" />
<build:Item Name="VisualStudio" Version="12.0" />
<build:Item Name="VisualStudioEdition" Value="Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2013" />
<build:Item Name="OperatingSystem" Version="6.3.9600.16384 (winblue_rtm.130821-1623)" />
<build:Item Name="Microsoft.Build.AppxPackage.dll" Version="12.0.31101.0" />
<build:Item Name="ProjectGUID" Value="{C805A27C-951F-4C0D-A831-1126F9A70563}" />
<build:Item Name="MSAdvertising" Version="6.1" />
<build:Item Name="MakePri.exe" Version="6.3.9600.17298 (winblue.141024-1500)" />
</build:Metadata>
</Package>
As you can see the package version being generated is wrong. Can you explain where exactly in the solution that value is taken from? I thought it was from WMAppManifest but I could be wrong.
Edit: In looking at the code above and then rereading what I wrote I realized my blaring error. I completely forgot that Silverlight 8.1 apps have an appxmanifest as well and that data is drawn from that as well as WMAppManifest. I never updated the version
in that appxmanifest. Thank you for the help and I apologize for my stupidity.

Amount on Goods receipt for return orders is wrong with movement type 653

Hi All, I am sorry if it is a simple question because i am an abap'er.
My requirement is to create return sales order (with ref.to Billing document) and deliver and PGI for the return orders. This should go to sales order stock. Accounting document should be generated for material document and the amount should be picked up from condition type (if man.cond. type exist) else from material master.
1) Created a sales order (Bought in item cat) - Create PO (Non stock) - Receive goods (MIGO) - Create Delivery (VL01N) - PGI (Movement type 601 and special stock indic. 'E') - Create billing document (F2 type from VF01)
So far it is good. The account document is created (PGI - cost of goods) with correct amount as desired
The next scenario is if the material is returned? This is where we are having issues
Created sales order with ref.to billing doc. (S.O: RE. Item.Cat. Return Bought in (YRBI)... this is pretty much same as bought in except few things which are YRBI - Delivered - PGI (Goods returns. unrestricted) Movement type 653 - Problem comes here.
a) If i put special stock indic 'E' in 'Return bought in item.cat - There is no accounting document generated for 653 movement type.
b) if i maintain space instead of 'E' in return bought in item.cat - there is an accounting document but the manual cost is not copied to accounting document and it is picking up from material master which we dont want and The stock is not showing up in sales order.
I did my research (forum, OSS, google, and in help.sap.com) before posting here but no help.
I have checked account assignment categories for 'A' - (some post explained this) I tried changing values but no help.
I even tried changing the schedule line category to DN but no help.
I dont know what i forgot to change or check but i have tried everything what i know and from help from different sources ... still couldnt get it.
Original requirement is to make the return stock as sales order stock and this can also be returned to vendor. If there is a manual cost in return sales order, the PGI accounting document should be created with this condition value else from material master.
My pricing settings are good.
It would be really helpful if any one guide me to configure the process or atleast if anyone tells me what am i missing... .

Have a look at any of the following notes:-
1) Note 171989 - Sales-order-related productn: Custmr exit COPCP002
2) Note 520000 - FAQ: Valuated special stocks
3) Note 557582 - User exit and valuated sales order stock
4) Note 580228 - Incorrect prices for materials procured externally
5) Note 983193 - Docu:Externally procurd material in valtd sales order stock
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Sales order item details with condition types

Hi Guys,
I am uploading the sales order details using DIRECT INPUT method in LSMW, one line item having 5 condition types, but in the item level structure BVBAKPOM, I can able to MAP only four condition types.
Is there any way to map more then 4 condition type in the ITEM level structure? Or do we need to loop the item level structure.
Waiting for your valuable replies
Thanks,
Gourisankar.

Hi Harish,
INOB table key is CUOBJ, At run time the VBAP-CUOBJ is not generated yet. Its value is now "999999999999990001".
I guess once the order is created we will get an entry in INOB.
Do you have any other way with which INOB entry can be selected ?
Thank You.

Malicious/Pointless orders being generated

Hi
Our website was launched a month ago and we have quite a basic (but
perfectly sufficient) shopping cart system built with ASP and SQL Server
2000.
When the shopper clicks "Proceed to Secure to Checkout" then the page moves
to checkout1.asp where they enter the details regarding the customer ie
name, address (home/delivery). Then checkout2.asp shows a confirmation of
the order, its contents and where it will be shipped to.
Checkout3.asp takes payment details. We have a Javascript on this page which
checks Visa, Mastercard and a couple of others for the correct pattern.
Over the last few days we have been receiving a number of orders which
obviously arent seriously intended to be genuine. At first we had customers
leaving ALL fields in checkout1.asp blank but now I have put a Javascript in
to check that certain form elements have content.
This morning these form elements are just being filled out with "a" in each
box. I am loathe to make customers register for the site because I have had
many customers telling me so directly.
Can anyone suggest what to do? I have heard about sites that check your IP
address and record this with transactions. Is this feasible? Does anyone
have any other suggestions as to what I can do?
Thanks
Richard
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002

You should always validate on the server side. What if a client turns
javascript off? Or uses something other than a browser?
I would also do more than just a syntax check on the credit card number.
This should clean things up.
Bob
"Richard Davies" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:aaoh5u$a3o$[email protected]..
Hi
Our website was launched a month ago and we have quite a basic (but
perfectly sufficient) shopping cart system built with ASP and SQL Server
2000.
When the shopper clicks "Proceed to Secure to Checkout" then the pagemoves
to checkout1.asp where they enter the details regarding the customer ie
name, address (home/delivery). Then checkout2.asp shows a confirmation of
the order, its contents and where it will be shipped to.
Checkout3.asp takes payment details. We have a Javascript on this pagewhich
checks Visa, Mastercard and a couple of others for the correct pattern.
Over the last few days we have been receiving a number of orders which
obviously arent seriously intended to be genuine. At first we hadcustomers
leaving ALL fields in checkout1.asp blank but now I have put a Javascriptin
to check that certain form elements have content.
This morning these form elements are just being filled out with "a" ineach
box. I am loathe to make customers register for the site because I havehad
many customers telling me so directly.
Can anyone suggest what to do? I have heard about sites that check your IP
address and record this with transactions. Is this feasible? Does anyone
have any other suggestions as to what I can do?
Thanks
Richard
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002

Create outbound delivery without order reference but with order data

I am interested in creating an outbound delivery without order reference...but include data from a sales order that has already been PGI'd. Has anyone come up against this and found a solution?

There is a button on VL01N transaction saying W/o Order Reference...
Click on that and then enter the shipping type, delivery type... and in the main screen enter the data that u have in ur order...
try that.... all the best
reward points if helpful...

Backflush Components With Movement Type 101 When Confirm Production Order

Hi PP Gurus,
I found that we have a backflushing material (procurement type: F) in 'Good Movement' with movement type 101 instead of 261.
The movement type of this material (procurement type: F) in reservation is 261. How did system determine the movement type 101 there?
Is there any user exit used there?
Appreciate any help. Thanks.
Regards,
Sun Qiang

>
Qiang Sun wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> The control key has not been changed.
>
> In another production order, the error ocurred on another component which is the first line in 'Goods Movement'.
>
> Cheers,
> Sun Qiang
Hi,
Pl check in component overview which operation has been assigned to pericular material in Operation tab.
It should be 10.
Arun

Unique record to display, with ORDER BY

Table order
Order_Number, Cust_Name
222, XYZ
223, XYZ
224, ABC
Table Product
Order_Number, p_name
222, p1
222, p2
222, p3
223, p1
223, p4
here i need to display only 2 records (1 record for one order number) but with ORDER BY as below
SELECT Order_Number, Cust_Name
FROM order o
INNER JOIN Product p ON (o.Order_Number = p.Order_Number)
WHERE o.Cust_Name = 'XYZ'
ORDER BY p_name;
1) If i put DISTINCT, below error
SQL Error: ORA-01791: not a SELECTed expression
01791. 00000 - "not a SELECTed expression"
2) If i put GROUP BY, below error
SQL Error: ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
00979. 00000 - "not a GROUP BY expression"
please help me to form the query

Try this
select o.order_number, o.cust_name
from (
select o.*,p.*, row_number() over(partition by o.order_number order by p.p_name)
from order o
join product p
on o.order_number = p.order_number
where o.cust_name = 'XYZ'
where rno = 1

O2 order confirmation with Order no & collection reference but no record of mobile on my o2

Please can someone help?I set up a pay monthly phone online 2 days ago and recieved an o2 order confirmation along with Order No and collection reference in the store I chose to pick up in but I've heard no more. I spoke to the online team and they told me that my order is still with the credit check team. So why have I got an order confirmation? Also I cannot see this order in my O2. So confuse

If it's with the credit check team still it means you have not yet been accepted so the order won't show and no confirmation until they do approve.

LS24 stock showing up as negative with stock type Q

Hi Gurus,
Can anybody please help me through this issue. The quality team passed an inspection lot and i see that there is a mterial doc generated with movement type 321 with a storage type 922, storage bin TR_ZONE stock category Q and posting change number on the WM tab of the material doc. Now i also see that there is this quantity of material showing up in LS24 with a negative sign and stock type Q. Now what do we need to so that the entry for the material goes away from LS24 and that the user can move this material from storage type 922 to 003 (where we usually store all tyhe materials).
Thanks
Anusha

As susggested, i tried to creat the transfer order from LU04 and/or LT06 and i get the error message.
No quants exist for posting changes
Message no. L3094
Diagnosis
No quants requiring a posting change were found.
Procedure
Check your entries.
Also to give little more background on why this problem could be happening is, all these days we used todeal with 101 movement type for international purchases. But recently we went with 107 and 109 movement types for international purchases. The advantage of doing this was, some of our vendors were on 30 days payment terms and it usually takes 60 days to get the material via ocean to US. PLus we take the ownership of material in Asia. So the way we handled this was the moment ownership is taken we would do a 107 (here inspection lot will not be created as the material is still on the water, this is made in config), which would then allows us to post invoice and process for payment, then finally when the material arrives at our plant in US, then we would do a 109 (during this inspection lot will be created, i made this entry in config). I'm starting to think that this could have impavceted somewhere in WM. By the way we only have one plant that is warehouse managed, rest of the other plants are not WM managed. I hope this background will help is solving this problem
Thanks
Anusha
Thanks
Anusha
Edited by: anusha vemulapati on Aug 16, 2011 2:54 PM

Materail recevice with referance to material document with mvt type 303

Hi Guru:
In MB1B we are creating mateiral document with movement type 303 from one plant to other plant.
Now same material we need to receive in other plant with movement type 305 in same T code Mb1B.
Now as per user requirement if there is number of item are coming in material document which is generate with movement type 303, why we need to give all material, qty, batch again in MB1B movement type 305,
while we are receving same material in plant.
In MB1B there is link to create material document with referance to material document but we can use this facility for creating new material document for movement type 303 of same mateiral, qty and batch.
Please suggest is there any way to use this 303 movement type material document with movement type 305.
Thanks.
Virendra
09887603301

Hi
In my opinion in MB1B you can not have Material Doc. as a ref. Doc. for M.Type: 305...
But for MIGO transaction you can have Material doc. as a ref. doc. for M.Type: 305
Goto ---> OLME ---> Settings for Enjoy Transaction ---> Settings for Goods Movements -
> Settings for Transactions and Referance Documents ---> There...for MIGO_TR...Transfer Posting ---> Referance Documents ---> For your M.Type: 305 assign Material Document as a Referance Documnt...
Reward if useful
Regards
S.Baskaran

SD invoice posted with document type RV ,

Hi all,
I try to do incoming payment for SD invoice posted with document type - RV. when i used to do incoming payment by transc code: f-28. An ABAP dun error occurs, stating termination " message type-X".
Is it possible to do incoming payment for SD invoice from FI. Urgent help needed.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
Once an Invoice is created in SD, An Accounting document is generated with document type RV. RV Doc. Type shows that the customer is liable to pay the amount.
While you post the document through f-28, the document type shuld be changed to customer payment.
It may be one of the reason. So select the docment type customr payment but not RV and try
Regards

REM Planned Orders being generated with Order type LA instead of PE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for