Remote activation in different Clients of R/3 system

Hi
I am trying to do CubeServ BW case study from SAP Business Intelligence book. I am logged in BW system and the exercise requires transfer of Data Source Object from BI Content. When I try this step I am prompted with "Remote activation in the Source System E61CLNT050" message followed by login window. I have access to Client51 of R/3 system. But when I check for available source systems, E61CLNT051 and E61CLNT052 are available but there is no E61CLNT051. So I am stuck at this step.
Is there a way to add or (switch to ) E61CLNT051 and continue with other steps?
Thanks in advance.
Sundar

Hi Dili,
This is due to Source System Configuration done in TCodes SALE and SM59. You also have to note that while defining the systems, they should be defined as Trusted System so that the User Authentication screen doesnt come up.
Regards,
Tom.

Similar Messages

RFC Destinations for different clients on same host

Hi
I have an SRM and SUS on the same server and the clients are different. I have a flow from SRM to SUS and also back from SUS from SRM.
Do I have to create seperate RFC Destinations for different clients?
What about the other details likePort, Partner Profile, Logical system etc, do we have to maintain all for both of them seperately ?
Regards
Ajith

Hi Ajith,
Do I have to create seperate RFC Destinations for different clients?
>>> A set of RFC Destination, Port & Parnter Profile is used to connect two systems between one client of source system to one client of Target system. Eg. from clinet 100 of XXX system to clinet 100 of YYY system. So, you need to take this into account and create seperate RFC destination for each different pair of connections.
What about the other details likePort, Partner Profile, Logical system etc, do we have to maintain all for both of them seperately ?
>>>In PI, you need to create BS for each different client of SRM & SUS system.
I hope this helps.
Regards, Gaurav.

2 clients of 1 apo system connecting to 2 clients in same ECC system

Hi
We have a requirement at our end as below-
1)We have 2 clients in our APO Developement system and they are using BW functionality of APO
2)These 2 clients need to talk to 2 different client in our ECC System for ex:- APD has 2 clients(100 & 200) and ECC has two clients(101 and 201).
We need APD 100 to talk to ECC client 101 and APD client 200 talking to ECC client 201.
The query is - Is this possible to do the same .
If yes,can anyone guide me with some required documents

Hi sunny
One more query :-
The scenario is we want to connect 2 APO systems to 2 different clients of same ECC box
For Ex:-
ECC 100 ---> APD100
ECC 200 ---> APT200
There is only 1 ECC box with 2 clients.
I am not sure if we have some restrictions with regards to BW of APO connecting to 1 ECC box.
Do you have any idea if there are some issues while doing it as we will have 2 APO-BW client talking to 2 clients in ECC
Thanksbasisadmin

SAP GRC 10 : Can we connect GRC to multiple clients within the same system

We are having this requirement to connect SAP GRC to two different clients within the QA System.
Just wondering whether this is possible to connect at the same time. We have created connectors in both the clients in ECC and in GRC we have connectors for both ECC Cllients. When I try to add the connector for second client in SPRO , it is not even showing up entry for that
Please confirm whether we can do this

Hi Anil
If you have two ECC clients you would create two connectors to GRC. You would need two SM59 RFC connections (one for each client) to map them through.You can map them to the same logical group though.
What is not working for you? Did you define both clients as their own connectors?
Regards
Colleen

Problem accessing company resources remotely using Cisco VPN Client

I connect to my company's network remotely using Cisco VPN client both from a PC (v 4.0.1) and from a MacBook Pro (v 4.9.00)(same configs), and use Remote Desktop to connect to my work computer, and now i'm able to use Citrix to run applications on the company server.
The problem occurs on the Mac when I'm connecting from a location that uses the same private domain IP as our company's private domain. Our company's private domain is 192.168.1.x, so when I'm using the Mac on a WiFi router that happens to be set to 192.168.1.1, the Mac can connect using VPN but the remote desktop cannot connect to my work computer. Presumably, the Mac doesn't "know" that I'm trying to go through the VPN for the connection and not connect to something locally.
This problem seems to be unique to the Mac. Every Windows machine with the same client installed has no problems no matter what WiFi I've tried. The Mac works fine on any WiFi that is not 192.168.1.x.
However, since 192.168.1.x is very common (hotels, airports, etc., its a major problem with the Mac.
Suggestions are greatly appreciated!
Also, now that we're moving to Citrix, our administrator has created a webpage on the intranet that we launch applications from, but the Mac cannot find that page when connected to VPN from 192.168.1.x. Same problem.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I presume you have split-tunneling activated.
1. Make sure the 192.168.1.x is on the protected networks and on the MacBook client, disable "Allow local LAN access"
2. Create a separate group for the Mac users and assgn them a different pool (192.168.100.x )and advertise it in your company to point to the VPN Concentrator.
3. Use the NAT feature on your VPN concentrator.
If this helped, please rate.
Regards,
Daniel

To check the difference between 2 programs from 2 different clients

standard program which you can use to compare difference between sources codes of 2 different programs

Hi,
use remote comparision to compare the program with two different clients..or use TCODE-SE39
Regards,
Nagaraj

Comapring the smartform in two different clients!!

Hi Experts,
I have a situation, where I need to compare a same smartform in two different clients. As we can do the Remote comparison for the program, similarly how can we do it for smartform?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ganesh,
Actually Smartforms are client-independent. So there is no question of same smartform being different in different clients.
Just check your SF once again.
Hope this resolves your query.
Reward all the helpful answers.
Regards

Compare rules in different Clients

Hi Experts,
We are trying to compare rules over different clients to see the differences.
How can we do this? Does SAP allow this? Please help.
thanks,
Ana

Ana:
Does it at least do whole table comparison between two systems (as I don't have 46C to look at) ? If it does, try to create a new comparison; this time, after you key in the table name, it will lead you to 'Selection by / Manual input' screen. Click on object overview button. On the following screen, check mark on the table, and click 'Comparison' button. A logon screen (for remote system) will pop up for you to key in uname / pwd (if you don't already have uid/pwd set up on RFC between the two systems). Once you key it in, it will ask if you want to restrict the comparison (for ECC 60 anyway). This is where you would have the opportunity to key in the rule name.
Again, 46C may act differently ...
Rgds.

How to connect different clients of same SAP Instance

Hi,
I have a question abour CPS 7, Basic- / Free of Charge Version
I know that this version is restricted to have only one SAP Instance per Isolation Goup, but how about different clients of the same Instance ?
Is it necessary to create an Isolation Group for each client of the same instance ?
We actually have 1 isolation group with 1 Instance and 1client .
Trying to create a second XBP Connection to another client fails then saving the changes with error:
"JCS-102120: SAP System DI1.DI1_045 should be isolated but is not. Show error details"
I didnt find a concrete statement in the Installation - and in the Admin Guide.
Regards
Frank

Hi Frank,
This is correct, there is one client per isolation group. The free version works similar in this respect to SM36/SM37: jobs are defined in each client individually and independently.
Regards,
Anton.

ERROR WHILE testing WEBSERVICE IN TWO DIFFERENT CLIENTS

hi all
i have developed a proxy and try to test web service in wsadmin tcode through two DIFFERENT CLIENTS.
FROM CLIENT 1 IT IS SHOWING THE SUCCESSFULL RESPONSE
BUT FROM CLIENT 2 IT IS SHOWING THE FOLLOWNG ERROR.
No implementing class registered for the interface (ABAP interface, request message , request message, namespace )
THANKS
praveen kalwa

hi marten
can u describe in brief what i should do in the sxmb_adm in the both client ..
why because i could not find any thing
PLS DO THE NEED FULL
thanks in advance
PRAVEEN KALWA

Different Service Desks in different clients in the same Solution Manager?

Hi
Is it possible to place different Service Desks in different clients in the same Solution Manager?
Concrete we plan the following scenario:
- Division 1
-- System 1,2,3, etc.
-- Service Desk in client 100
-- Monitoring for the whole trust in client 050 (still exists)
- Division 2
-- System 4,5,6, etc.
-- Service Desk in client 200
-- Monitoring for the whole trust in client 050 (still exists)
Is it possible to realize this scenario or are there any restrictions?
Thanks & Regards
Andreas
Edited by: Andreas Städler on Mar 19, 2008 5:52 PM
Edited by: Andreas Städler on Mar 19, 2008 5:54 PM

hi Neil
did u solve the problem still Struck let me know
we can access the same iview n no of clients. let me know any do u have any queries and other infomation
bvr
Edited by: bvr on Dec 2, 2008 6:32 AM

Unable to add Active Directory: Kerberos Client trace scenario configuraiton

Hi,
While trying to add Active Directory: Kerberos Client trace scenario configuraiton, I am getting this error message in the log (see below).
What am I missing?
Thanks
Alex.
6/24/2014 10:09:18 AM Information running ETW Manifest Import Adapter on supplemental OPN: done
6/24/2014 10:09:18 AM Warning Cannot create ETW manifest loader for Active Directory: Kerberos Client: The system cannot find the file specified. Please check that the manifest is properly installed
6/24/2014 10:09:18 AM Information running ETW Manifest Import Adapter on Active_Directory__Kerberos_Client: completed successfully
6/24/2014 10:09:18 AM Error running ETW Manifest Import Adapter on Active_Directory__Kerberos_Client: Unexpected exception happened: The given key was not present in the dictionary. stacktrace: at Microsoft.Opn.Runtime.Messaging.Etw.GeneratedOpnCacheManager.ImportEtwProviderMetadata(Guid
providerId, EtwManifestResolver manifestResolver, Boolean reportConflicts)
Product Technical Specialist in Identity Management, Microsoft Canada. http://blogs.msdn.com/alextch

Active Directory: Kerberos Client is MOF based ETW provider.
Looks like PEF/Message Analyzer version which your using doesn't have parsing of events from MOF based providers.
We added support MOF based ETW providers in PEF/MA v1.0.2 . What is PEF/MA version your using?
Alternatively, you can use LinkLayer/Firewall Trace Scenarios to get the Kerberos Network traffic or other Kerberos Manifest based ETW providers for example "Microsoft-Windows-Security-Kerberos" etw provider if these providers produce any ETW events.

Enhancements are not visible in different clients

Hello Experts,
I am facing a strange issue in my compoenent enhancements for IUICMD.
I have created an enhancement set ZCRM_IUICMD and assigned it to different clients thorugh BSPWDV_EHSET_ASG.
All my enhancements to componenet are attached to the above enhancement. Suddenly i can see that my enhancements
behave differently in two different clients.
I have verified the repository objects like classes & methods and also UI configuration. It remains same in both clients.
Let me know if you have faced similar problem and your solution to that.
Thanks in advance................
Best Regards,
Prabahar

Hi Saumya,
I am enhancing the component view IUICMD/DetailAccount. Here i have created a new context node for BuilheaderSearch.
I am using using context node attribute ID_TYPE in IUICMD/DetailAccount & Provided F4 help for that. Now i can see Input help in client 200 & not able to see that in client 210.
I have assigned my enhancements to both the clients 200 &210. In both the clients UI Configuration remains the same.
Hope it gives you the details that you are expecting.
Best regards,
Prabahar
Edited by: Prabahar N.R on Sep 10, 2009 1:10 PM

Different Client Versions in OWB 9i and 10g

Hi,
Our client is using 9i OWB Client Software, and we are planning to use OWB10g Client Software on Windows Platform.
Will there be any compatability issues while moving from 9i OWB Client Software to 10g Client software.
And what are other parameters we need to consider, if possible please mention any documents links available.
Kindly let me know the pros/cons in this model .
Here my main question is will there be backward compatibility, i.e repository in 9i database need to connect by using the OWB 10g client?
With Regards,
Kranth...
Edited by: user8536050 on Jan 18, 2010 1:44 AM

Hi,
you cannot use different client versions on the same repository. If you want to use owb 10g, then you have to upgrade the repository to 10g. Then you can only use 10g clients, owb 9i clients cannot connect to that repository.
Regards,
Carsten.

Error When Run ABAP Query in Different Client

Hi ABAPers,
Currently I develop ABAP Query using SQ01 / SQ02 / SQ03.
Everything goes well, and I have already test that the query work well. The query can be execute and show the result correctly.
My peer in same SAP system, but different client, run the same query. As I know that query is same with ABAP program which is client independent, can be execute across client. But then the runtime error show up.
The error said that
Exception condition "NO_POSITION_FOUND" raised.
Can anybody told me what's happened here, and how can I resolve this problem?
Thank you in advance
Regards
Hadi

Hi,
Since you are testing it in other client,i think due to data inconsistency you are getting that error.
Try to check the corresponding tables in both clients and can verify.
Cheers,
KK.

Remote activation in different Clients of R/3 system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for