Removing standard operators for a field in Advanced search

Hi,
JDev 11.1.1.3.
In ADF application, we need to remove few standard operators from the list for a field in Advanced search. For this we have followed the below oracle documentation:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/web.1111/b31974/web_search_bc.htm#ADFFD2457
27.3.3 How to Create Custom Operators or Remove Standard Operators
As specified in the doc, we have added the below "CompOper" tag to VO.xml. We have to remove all the operators present in the list except the "Equal to". But the issue is, using below code the "Not between" and "contains" operators are deleted from list, but "Not equl to" is still getting displayed. We have also tried "Doesnotequal". I have tried the oper string with spaces, without spaces, spaces replaced by underscore.
Can some one please provide the exact String to be passed in oper attribute of CompOper for all operators?
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="CmLookupTypesVOCriteria_vcrow16_Category"
ViewAttribute="Category"
Operator="="
Conjunction="AND"
Required="Optional"
UpperColumns="1">
<CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTEQUALTO"/>
<CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTBETWEEN"/>
<CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="CONTAINS"/>
</ViewCriteriaItem>
Thanks,
Manasa Tadi

I am not able to find the list for the entire set of operators, but you could follow a simple technique to identify the exact operator to be used:
In the View Criteria editor, for any of the attribute, modify the operator to any desired value, this would update the *VO.xml,
use the same operator, if you want to hide it in advanced mode - as you have done earlier.
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="CmLookupTypesVOCriteria_vcrow16_Category"
ViewAttribute="Category"
Operator="="
Conjunction="AND"
Required="Optional"
UpperColumns="1">
<CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTEQUALTO"/>
<CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTBETWEEN"/>
<CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="CONTAINS"/>
</ViewCriteriaItem>
Thanks,
Navaneeth

Similar Messages

  • Bug after adding fields in advanced search mode of af:query

    We are migrating from JDeveloper 11.1.1.6 to 11.1.1.7.
    I noticed the following issue:
    In a page with search criteria (based on a view object), when the user adds an additional field in advanced search mode and clicks on a full submit button in the page, the following browser popup appears:
    "This page is asking you to confirm that you want to leave - data you have entered may not be saved."
    This was logged as a bug in Oracle Support but we have not been able to find a workaround yet.
    This is the only issue currently blocking us from migrating to 11.1.1.7. Has anyone else faced this issue? Any ideas on how we can bypass this behavior?
    Thank you,
    Gabriel.

    Unfortunately, the latest update from Oracle Support was that they no longer consider this a bug!
    SR 3-7706485141: Additional Fields in af:query problem - JDeveloper 11.1.1.7
    Bug 17346704 - ADDING FIELD TO AF:QUERY ADVANCED SEARCH CAUSES SPURIOUS WARNING DIALOG POPUP
    1. I cannot understand how something that blocks user actions and cannot be bypassed in any way could be considered "acceptable behavior".
    2. I also do not understand how a Bug can be lodged and then have its status changed to "Not a Bug".
    3. Even if we were to ignore this issue and convince our customers that they should be delayed by meaningless popups while working (which we cannot), their is still another issue that makes this functionality dysfunctional. When the user clicks on "Stay on Page" the popup closes and the page freezes and becomes unresponsive.
    Off course this is another issue and a different SR should open, but I think it shows that something is going very wrong with this functionality.
    I wonder if anyone else is considering using JDeveloper 11.1.1.7.0 in a production system.

  • Adding a new Search Field in Advance Search

    Hi,
    In 1 of the advance search regions, :
    We have a search panel in the adv search RN. In the poplist we have say 10 fields. We can add either of these 10 fields and use for searching. Now I want to add another search field ( an attribute from a table).
    Question 1 :*
    How to find the underlying VO from which the search fields are coming. I saw the page ( about this page) but couldn't find anything.
    Question 2:*
    Suppose I get the VO (resolution from above question) , if my extra filed is not there I add it in the VO ( VO extn), now how to configure this new field to the existing search panel fields?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think search fields are not mapped to any VO. If this is your standard page, check the standard controller. It might be getting values from pageContext.getparameter().
    You can create a new item using 'Personalize this Page' option and extend your controller to set where clause for the same.
    --Sushant                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • SRM 7 Add a field to Advanced Search

    Hi,
    we have a requirement, where I need to add a feild on the advanced search screen. Are there any BADis to acheive this.
    Any info on this is highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Krishna

    Hi Siva,
    Thank you for the response.
    Can you please elaoborate this. Like how you renamed the standard field, how to find out which structure needs to be appended. A step by step guidance if you have time on this will really help me ... 
    Looking forward to here from you again.
    Believe me , you will be highly appreciated for the info.
    Thanks in advance,
    Krishna

  • Date picker not showing for datetime type in advanced search page

    Hi,
    I have an advanced search page in my SharePoint 2013 site. There is a property which is of type datetime. For that I'm not getting a date picker. I don't know why this is not working. It is showing the date picker in SharePoint 2010 but not in 2013. Can
    anyone help me on this? Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Jawahar
    Im searching more abt me...........

    A date picker was never supported in Advanced Search.
    Blog | SharePoint Field Notes Dev Tools |
    SPFastDeploy | SPRemoteAPIExplorer

  • Restrict fields in advanced search

    Hi,
    afaik you should be able to restrict the fields exposed to the user in the advanced search with R18.
    I am not able to find the place to configure this. Any hints?
    Thanks in advance
    Michael

    Michael, tere is a new privilege called "All fields in Search and Lists" that controls if a user sees all available fields or just the ones on the record detail page.

  • Input field in "Advanced Search"

    Hello Experts,
    I'm setting the "Search Component Set" and "Search Option Set" in our portal, and I've a little question..
    In our default "Search Option Set" I disabled the property "Enable Large Search Field" (and it works fine, the input field is not large!) BUT during the search when I go in "Advanced Search" the input field return large... Why??
    Is possible to set a  not large input field also in "Advanced search" ?
    Thanks in advance

    Ok,
    in SystemAdmin > SystemConfig > ContentManagement > UserInterface > Search
    you can find the "Search Component Set" and "Search Option Set".
    Configuring "Search Option Set" (the default option set used is "UISearch") you can enable/disable the parameter "Enable Large Search Field", that works on input field width..
    If I disable this parameter the input field of my toolArea is short, but if go into "Advanced Search" the input field change and became large...

  • Leading zeros remove from FB05 for assignment field in process open items b

    Dear expert
    At present i am using the electronic bank statement completed OT83 & OT51configuration, when i am running FF-5 the EBS soft copy has been uploaded and created batch input session.
    I executed  batch input session and the transactions has been posting through FB05 for outgoing payment clearing  with assignment field ( where check number is laying correctly and matching EBS soft copy cheque number and SAP outgoing clearing account line item assignment cheque number ) in case of outgoing clearing is happening correctly.
    but where as i have a problem incoming clrg cheque number which is displaying in assignment field and updated when client using FF68(check deposit / collections).
    the user is punching all collections from customers using t.code FF68 and cheque number is updated with 6 digit number in the variant. it is like a JV.
    after posting batch input session the cheque is number displaying in assignment field. the cheque number is updated with 6 digit number. but in the variant cheque number width 6 digit only  but after posting FF68 & SM35 the system automatically taking leading zeros for the remaining length. Cheque number standard length in SAP 13 in table .
    total 13 digit length but user punched only 6 digit only, because the cheque number 6 digit numberonly. so the remaining 7 digits it is occupaying 0000000.
    while executing FF_5 and SM35  (thr FB05) the assignment field cheque number (0000000586585) and soft copy cheque number 6 digit (586585) is not matching , because of that i am unable to clear the incoming collections or incoming payments clrg.
    so how  can i remove the leading zeros after cheque number ( actually displaying 0000000586585 , but i want without zeros only cheque number 586585) in assignment field in FB05 using FF-5 & SM35).
    is there any enhancement or user exit to remove leading zeros or any other way of work around .
    Regards

    Hi Amareswar,
    In your case, request your bank to provide cheque number with leading zeros in electronic bank statement as the leading zeros in the assignment field is SAP system behaviour.
    Alternatively, use 'Define Search String for Electronic Bank Statement' (refer http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/6d/0cdf4b142e11d3963800a0c9426c73/frameset.htm for details) in the IMG, customize it to search for the cheque number provided in the note to payee field > then append leading zeros.
    The first method is the solution we are using and it is the most cost effective.
    Hope the above helps.
    Kind regards,
    John Chin

  • How to restrict columns in Advanced search which are known at runtime

    Hi Team,
    I need your suggestions for one of my adf search usecase. I had Querypanel with table on UI...where in Viewobject has relations with 2 other tables and this Viewobject is based on Entity...now in advanced search for addfields i was getting all column names by default like 3 tables column names....instead of all columns i need to restrict to particular columns. This particular columns will be decided at runtime like how many columns needs to be shown and alias names for those particular columns. So could you please help me how to approach this requirement.
    Thanks in Advance for your help.

    whatever you said is at designtime wherein we can uncheck the Queryable checkbox....but as i said at runtime from the application i can come to know whichever fields needs to be there and alias names for columns for add fields in Advanced search...

  • Operators in advanced search view

    Hi Experts,
    could you tell me how the available operators are determined in advanced search views?
    I build a search view based on a own custom BOL and want to remove some operators now.
    Thanks in advance!
    Best regards,
    Alex

    Nevermind!
    Solution: Component Specific Settings -> Define Operators for Dynamic Queries in SPro.

  • Delta enabling for Customised fields

    Hi All,
    We have customixed info object - 'Subscriber'(ZSUBSCRIB) for 2lis_11_vahdr data source. This field       (ZZKZ4 - partner for the contract) is manual input for a Contract in VA42 Tcode. The delta load in BW does not capture changed values for this field. The changed record for this is getting transferred to BIW from ECC by repair full update only. The mentioned field is updated by direct assignment from ECC.
    Also I have checked in the RSA2 Tcode in ECC system; for the data source 2LIS_11_VAHDR; the check box is ticked for this field (ZZKZ4) in the column Not transferred to Extractor. Is this affecting  the changed records for this field to be transffered by delta.
    Request you to  let us know if the delta capability can be utilized to update this record in BIW system.
    Kind regards,
    Biswajeet

    please remove this tick for this field (it causes field's value not to be forwarded to extractor)
    In which table you have added new field ? if this is in any table which extractor refers (like vbrp) delta will work for change in that  field

  • F4 help for two fields in screen

    hello,
    I have two fields in my table control which need F4 help in the screen.
    But one F4 search exit is implemented, but it populates only one field.
    but, on clicking f4 for one field, it should populate both the fields together.
    do help me with this issue...
    Can POH in the screen populate up two fields together???

    Hi Krithika ,
    In addition to checking up the export parameters for the Search healp you will have to define the Search Help attachment also. I'll paste the SAP Help Text below but in Simple terms
    You Define a structure with the fields to be returned and define the screen elements based on that structure . So on selection the structure is returned with all values and the screen elements are in referance to structure so all values get posted in screen.
    Here is the SAP HELP part
    "" From SAP HELP
    A search help attachment is an assignment of a search help to a table, structure or data element, causing the corresponding search help to be automatically used to describe the input help process at this field when an ABAP Dictionary field is used in a screen.
    You can attach a search help as follows:
    1. Attach a search help to a structure or table field: The attached search help is available for all screen fields that refer to the table or structure field. There must be an assignment between the interface parameters of the search help and the fields of the table or structure for this type of attachment. In the input help process, this assignment results in a value transport between the corresponding fields (if they are known at least to the module pool of the screen) and the search help parameters. As for the foreign key definition, you can assign nothing, a constant or any other field (which is then sought in the module pool) to indivdiual search help parameters.
    2. Attach a search help to a table: The assigned search help is available for all screen fields for which the table is a check table. There must also be an assignment between the search help parameters and the key fields of the table for this type of assignment.
    3. Attach a search help to a data element: The attached search help is available for all screen fields that refer to the data element. If the search help is attached to a data element, an export parameter of the search help must be assigned to the data element. If the user chooses a row of the hit list in the input help, the contents of this parameter are returned in the corresponding screen field. More than one value is not returned when a search help is attached to a data element.
    The described attachments only take effect if the field was not yet assigned an input help in the screen definition. Such an assignment can be made with the mechanism PROCESS ON VALUE-REQUEST in the flow logic or by attaching a search help to the screen field in the attribute maintenance screen. A F4 help can also be assigned to the field in the flow logic by using VALUES or SELECT. In the latter case, the input help here behaves as if the table specified under SELECT were assigned to the field as check table.
    If more than one of the described mechanisms compete in defining the input help method of a screen field, the first one named will take effect. If none of the described mechanisms is available, the domain fixed values of the field will be used for the input help if necessary. If the domain of the field has no fixed values but has data type DATS or TIMS, the input helps that are assigned to these types are used for the input help. Otherwise there will be no input help available for the field.
    A search help attachment always belongs to the definition of the object to which the attachment is made (structure, table or data element). It is also maintained in the maintenance transaction for this object and transported with this object.
    <b>REWARD IF USEFUL. It Works for me here..get back if any doubts.</b>

  • Advanced Search-Clearing search criteria

    Hi,
    I am developing apps using JDev 10.1.2. and JHS build 32.
    My problem is with using the Advanced Search on page with table layout.
    The Advanced Search contains one lookup field (a lamp).
    When I enter something in the lamp field and press Find button I get proper result.
    Then I run Clear. All field from Advanced Search region are cleared.
    Then I run Find and I get question similar to "You are about to leave page without commiting changes...". I choose OK and the lamp field get the old value and the result is incorrect.
    What is wrong?
    regards,
    Cezary

    Cezary,
    This is indeed a bug in JHeadstart, thanks for pointing this out. The fix will be present in the next release, but for now you and anyone running into it will have to apply a workaround: in the UIX page, locate the "FindXXX" field that has this problem. It will be easy to find because its name is suffixed with "_No_Update". This is incorrect (for the find field, it is OK for the actual form and/or table field!!). Remove the suffix NoUpdate and all should be well again.
    Hope this helps,
    Peter Ebell
    JHeadstart Team

  • Advanced Search Web Part

    Hi Everyone,
    Does anyone know where I can find the Advanced Search web part in 2013? I have used this web part many times in SharePoint 2007 and 2010 but can't seem to find it in 2013. Did Microsoft remove or rename it? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Dan
    Dan Marth

    Hi,
    According to your description, you could not find advanced search web part in SharePoint 2013.
    For SharePoint 2010, the advanced search web part is in the default page of Search Center.
    For SharePoint 2013, the advanced search web part is at the bottom of the search result page.
    You may need to search something firstly and then you can see the Advanced Search Option at the bottom of the page.
    Feel free to reply if there are still any questions.
    Best regards
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Advance Search not working in Document Management Task Flow

    Hi,
    We are using Document management task flow to manage UCM content. The simple search works for us but the Advance search does not work. Does anyone know of any possible reason why this could happen. Any hint would be really appreciated.
    Thanks
    Salim

    Hi Srinath,
    Thanks for replying.
    So in my scenario when I try to search the content using the simple search which is present at the right hand top corner I get the search result properly. But when I try to search by clicking on the Advance link which gives me a option to search by Filename, Keywords and adding other filters, it always returns zero search results.
    Thanks
    Salim

Maybe you are looking for

  • Will I lose my Unlimited Data plan?

    Hi, I currently have an LG Vortex, which I got sometime in June of this year when I was scheduled for an update. Obviously, my phone isn't ready for an update yet, but if I take in a phone I already have (such as my father's, which he's giving me bec

  • MeetingPlace Express User ID Change

    I am running MeetingPlace Express 2.1.1.2 and it is AD/CCM Integrated. We in the process of changing our AD User login ID and I may have run into a problem. From Call Manager perspective I just perform a full sync and it is good when a change is made

  • Numbers export to PDF looks horrible

    Was just editing a 1 page Mac OS X Numbers file on the iPad and wanted to share a PDF with a colleague. From the iPad, the page and graphs/charts now get split into many pages that look just horrible and are completely useless - simple graphs lit acr

  • Having problems with key chain password

    I just got my mac book yesterday, and I'm having problems with my keychain password. My keychain password is not the same as my login password, it won't accept it, so i think i made a typing error. Each time i go on to safari, it asks for the passwor

  • Probably a noob question...swatches palette

    Hi all, I work for a magazine publisher and I have an ad that was originally a PDF from a client. They needed some changes made to text and other elements so I opened it in Illustrator CS4 and did most of the changes. However there are some spot colo