Report printing issue after upgrading from LV 8.2 to LV 2009

Hello,
I am upgrading an application from LabView 8.2 to LabView 2009. It uses the Report Generation Toolkit to create reports based on Word templates. The reports are pretty complicated, with a lot of bookmarks, tables, and graphs, but only one page long.
The reports are generated correctly. However when sent to printing (using Print report.vi), the printer goes into spooling status and if you are patient enough you may get the report after at least 7 minutes. I tried changing the printer setting to "Print directly to the printer", as per an old KnowledgeBase article. No luck. I have installed a local printer. No luck again.
If I close the LabView application while the printer is shown in spooling status, the report prints right away, every time.
Never had this issue in LabView 8.2. On that machine I had Office XP. Now I have Office 2007...
I do not get any error whatsoever, and I cannot figure out where the solution may be.
I have one single report that prints right away every time I try. Coincidence or not, this is the only one that has no tables to print. It has graph though and plenty of bookmarks.
I have exhausted all the ideas on how to deal with this situation, and I must find a solution ASAP. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

Brandon,
Thanks for your input.
Not sure how I can use it to narrow down the problem though. I ran it, and I see that the printers are correctly identified, the default one is correctly found, however absolutely nothing is being printed out (I typed a text in the string control, and the Print control was on).
Everything runs with no errors. I would prefer to see a bunch of errors ...

Similar Messages

  • Printing issue after upgrade from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.3

    Hi
    I am trying to print the seed reports after upgrade. Text format reports are printing well, the problem is with the XML and RTF format reports, not yet tested the PDF format.
    Thanks
    Reddy

    Hi Hussein,
    Application release : 12.1.3
    Database Version : 11.2.0.2
    OS Version : RHEL 5.5
    The problem with the seeded reports only, not yet started testing the custom reports, for the XML/RTF its printing, but the output has lot of junk. If I view the output in the Concurrent request, it looks nice. When I view the file from $APPLCSF/$APPLOUT it has lots of junk, the same way it is printing.
    Thanks
    Reddy

  • Report Navigation Issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g

    Hi Experts
    I have recently upgarded my solution from 10g to 11g. Issue is when I click on column value for navigation it doen't navigate the display remains unchanged
    1) I have created new dashboard and placed this report in new dashboard the navigation works fine.
    2) I have created new report and placed that report in old dashboard it doesn't work
    why is it so I undertand that there is problem with Dashboard and not with report but I am unable to figure it out
    what can be the problem? any suggestions
    Thanks
    Sameer

    Hi Experts
    I have recently upgarded my solution from 10g to 11g. Issue is when I click on column value for navigation it doen't navigate the display remains unchanged
    1) I have created new dashboard and placed this report in new dashboard the navigation works fine.
    2) I have created new report and placed that report in old dashboard it doesn't work
    why is it so I undertand that there is problem with Dashboard and not with report but I am unable to figure it out
    what can be the problem? any suggestions
    Thanks
    Sameer

  • Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

    Hi All,
    There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
    This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
    Select query is on the table COSP.
    SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
            INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
            FROM  COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
            WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
              AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
              AND LEDNR EQ '00'
              AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
              AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
              AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
              AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
              AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
            GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
       LOOP AT I_COSP      .
         COSP                           = I_COSP      .
         PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
         CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
         CLEAR CCR1S                         .
       ENDLOOP.
    ENDSELECT.
    I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
    What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
    Thanks in advance for the responses.
    Regards,
    Dedeepya.

    Hi,
    ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
    Some generic comments:
    1. never use SELECT
                       endselect.
       SELECT
      into table
       for all entries in table
      where.
       use perform statment after this selection.
    2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
    3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
        e.g in your case
              sequence should be
    LEDNR
    OBJNR
    GJAHR
    WRTTP
    VERSN
    KSTAR
    HRKFT
    VRGNG
    VBUND
    PARGB
    BEKNZ
    TWAER
    PERBL
    sequence should be same as defined in table.
    Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
    I hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Pranaya

  • Stability issues after upgrade from 5 to 6.1?

    Dear all,
    my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
    an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
    products.
    However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
    statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
    have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
    appropriately.
    Having said this, my questions are:
    - Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
    on Solaris?
    - If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
    SP 5)?
    - In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
    My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
    don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.
    Many thanks in advance
    Andreas

    "Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
    my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
    an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
    products.
    However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
    statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
    have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
    appropriately.
    Having said this, my questions are:
    - Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
    on Solaris?
    - If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
    SP 5)?
    - In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
    My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
    don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.Hi Andreas,
    Normally proving that rumors are true is a responcibility of
    rumors suppliers. Reverse does sound to me like a joke.
    Regards,
    Slava Imeshev
    P.S. Current weblogic 6.1 is a stable product.

  • Issues after Upgrade from Oracle 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.5 in Windows Server2003

    Good Morning Good People,
    I have run in to some issues after upgrading my 10.1.0.5 database to 10.2.0.5. Initially after the firtst upgrade from 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.0 one has to run Critical Patch set 4 to get to 10.2.0.5. Well after initial up grade everything worked fine. I could connect to the database from within the server as well as remotely through SQL*PLUS client. However, after completeing the patch I'm still able to connect to the database from within the server, but remotely i get the following error:
    ORA-12514 : TNS Listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor.
    I also get Error ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor The Connection descriptor used by the client was: (description=(address=(host=mcquery2)(protocol=tcp)(port=1521))(connect_data=(sid=mcquery)(server=dedicated)))
    I've tried serval different things to trouble shoot the issue but nothing seems to work.
    If anyone has run into s similar issue please help. This is ruining my weekend! LOL!
    Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 9:15 AM

    From the client or the server?
    SERVER:
    tnsnames.ora:
    MCQUERY=
    (DESCRIPTION=
    (ADDRESS=
    (PROTOCOL=TCP)
    (HOST=10.36.27.184)
    (PORT=1521)
    (CONNECT_DATA=
    (SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
    listener.ora
    SID_LIST_LISTENER =
    (SID_LIST =
    (SID_DESC =
    (SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
    (ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Db_1)
    (PROGRAM = extproc)
    LISTENER =
    (DESCRIPTION_LIST =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
    FROM REMOTE SQLPLUS Client:
    tnsnames.ora
    MCQUERY=
    (DESCRIPTION=
    (ADDRESS=
    (PROTOCOL=TCP)
    (HOST=10.36.27.184)
    (PORT=1521)
    (CONNECT_DATA=
    (SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
    listener.ora
    SID_LIST_LISTENER =
    (SID_LIST =
    (SID_DESC =
    (SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
    (ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_3)
    (PROGRAM = extproc)
    LISTENER =
    (DESCRIPTION_LIST =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = cotsdot370.cotsdot.dom)(PORT = 1521))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
    Thanks,
    Malcolm
    Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 12:01 PM

  • Report Layout Changed After Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

    Dear Gurus,
    I do functional test of every process in ECC6 after upgrade from 4.6C. I found all report layout changed without variant (it's happen to all Query/SQ01 reports ). So I've to assign manually the fields for the reports, and create a default variant then.
    Why it happen ? Is there configuration or setting missed or this is standard while we do upgrade ?
    Thx in advance.
    Tri Wicaksono

    We do re arrange for all ALV report ...

  • Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T.

    903714 wrote:
    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
    So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
    To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
    alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
    Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

  • Lost XL reporter (.rcr) files after upgrade from B! 2005 to 2007 PL 47

    I have a user that says he has lost all of his XL reporter reports that he created since his upgrade of B1 from 2005 to 2007.  Has anyone had this issue?  Where are these reports stored?  Any ideas how to recover these reports?

    Dear Pat,
    XL Reports are actually stored in the individual company databases on which they are created, even if you uninstall the XLReporter addon, the reports will not be lost. XL Reports shouldn't also be deleted after an upgrade from 2005 to 2007 or from a patch to another. Thus far, I hadn't experienced any loss of XL Reports from upgrades.
    Hope this helps.
    Warmest Regards,
    Chinho

  • Printing Issues After Upgrading to Win 8.1

    Can someone direct me or help me out please. I upgraded to Windows 8.1 on Saturday from Windows 8. I have a Lexmark 7600 Series that used to print, now it doesnt. I have tried everything that I can think of which includes removing and re-installing the printer,making sure the software/drivers is updated. I keep getting the following message every time I do a test page ..
    communication not available:
    ensure printer is powered on, disconnect and reconnect the printer power cable, USB cable(which is how I print), check firewall, ensure the convenience port is not in use and restart the computer.
    I have tried all of the above. I  research Wins 8.1 compatibilty with this printer and nothing is listed whether it is or not. I never had this issue but I have notice on the website that alot of people are having issues with this Windows 8.1 upgrade and printers.
    I appreciate any feedback, help, links, anything that can help me fix this probblem before buying another printer which is not necessary since I know it prints on other computers in my house.
    Thanks
    Maribel

    Hey @Maribel09 ,
    Welcome to the HP Forums!
    I understand you're having issues with your Lexmark 7600 printer after upgrading to Windows 8.1.
    You may need a driver update for the newer version of Windows. I would suggest contacting Lexmark support as they would be the most qualified people to help you with this problem. You can contact Lexmark support here: Lexmark - Contact Us.
    Thanks!
    Please click the "Kudos, Thumbs Up" at the bottom of this post if you want to say "Thanks" for helping!
    Please click "Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    The Great Deku Tree
    I work on behalf of HP.

  • Stability issues after upgrading from OS 10.2.6 to OS 10.2.8

    Hey to all the Mac experts,
    I'm new to the Macs. I recently purchased a 2nd hand Power Mac G3 Beige Desktop for really cheap to learn and get a better understanding of Macs. It currently has 256 mb ram, G3 300 mhz cpu, 10 gig WD HD, 4.7 gig Mac DVD drive, 10 mb NIC, floppy, original mouse and keyboard, an USB add-on card, and video port adapter to use with SVGA monitors. It came with Mac OS 10.2 Jaguar loaded on and cd's. From the info, this older unit can't support or run 10.3 or 10.4. So, I'm fine with 10.2.
    My main concern is issues when I use the Software update feature and upgraded from 10.2.6 to 10.2.8. This MAC should run 10.2.8 according to the specs. After the update and restart, I sometimes get a blank screen, or can't move the mouse, lockups and random keyboard issues. I ended up reinstalling from scratch with just cds. I didn't load any 3rd party software. I reran the software update feature again. Same thing as before. After erasing and reloading a 2nd time. I only did the updates for everything but up to 10.2.8. I searched the apple site and downloaded the updates from 10.2.0 to 10.2.6. So, no problem with that. The only 3rd party software currently installed is Firefox 1.5 and adobe reader 6.01 plus all software updates for Quicktime, Safari, etc.
    Now my question is, what is the reason why it can't properly run version 10.2.8? Is there a workaround or solution to this problem? I know I could get by with 10.2.6, but what's the point when it should load and run 10.2.8 according to the specs here?
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=43124
    Thanks in advance for any info.
    PS> I read about sometimes Macs need a firmware update to properly run Mac OS 10. So, this is the only firmware I found for this MAC and it turns out I don't need it.
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25176
    Mac G3 Beige Desktop   Mac OS X (10.2.x)   256 mb ram, 10 gig hd, 300 mhz

    Hi macsoprano,
    Hello
    First of all, welcome to the Apple discussions.
    I don't think that this is a Firmware issue.
    Download the combo updater via this link: Combo Updater
    Don't forget repair permissions before and after the update
    Disk Repair Permissions
    * Good luck ...
    Dimaxum

  • Crystal Reports Duplexing issues after upgrading to SP5

    Our Application Software Vendor uses Crystal Reports XI as their reporting tool.  Recently we upgraded our application software which included upgraded from CR XI SP3 to SP5.  Since then we've experianced problems printing some of the reports in DUPLEX mode.  All our printers are set up to print DUPLEX by default.  Since they upgrade, many of our reports have begun to print SINGLE SIDED even though EVERYTHING should print in DUPLEX.  This only occurs if the report is to print to the users DEFAULT printer.  If the user changes printers before running the report, it prints correctly in DUPLEX mode. I opened the reports in the CR designer and changed the preinter setting to select the DEFAULT printer.  This worked in a couple of instances, but not for most of the reports.  Any input/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    I create all Crystal reports using the HP III driver as the designeted printer and have for 10 + years.. It is the generic HP driver  Seems to solve alot of printer problems that i have encountered reqardless of what printer they are actually using. 
    This is not used to replace the users print driver, just within the actual creation of the Reports.
    Good Luck.

  • POE Issues After Upgrade from 7.0.240 to 7.6.100

    We have a 5508 that has just been upgraded from 7.0.240 to 7.6.100 with many 1142's, 3502's, etc. Our wired network is HP 5406zl's POE on every port and plenty of power available for POE.
    As soon as we upgraded our 1142's to 7.6.100 we started getting poe faults on several switchports. The trap indicates an over-current error and the AP will not power up. I can move that same AP to another switch port and some times that will work. If I reboot the switch the faults may clear on those ports, but will reappear on other ports. It is not always the same APs, and not always the same switch ports.
    I have tried downgrading back to 7.0 and the errors clear. Obviously I want to be running the newer code for the bug fixes and features. TAC has not given this case any time yet.
    The switches report more than enough power being available still on the ports.  I can see the ports try to come up, and most of the times the AP will start to power up and come up at 8 watts as it boots, and as soon as the AP is ready to go and starts powering the radios it enters the fault state.
    The APs all run in local mode, and I have tried enabling "Pre-standard 802.3af switches. "
    Does anyone have any ideas? Something must have changed in the way power is drawn or negotiated.

    HI Glenn,
    Go for 7.4.121.0 (7.4MR2) version & see if this issue is there ? If not then it may be a bug/issue specific to this latest code. Here is the release notes for this code
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn74mr02.html
    Also makesure your WLC FUS also upgraded to 1.7.0.0. See below & keep note this will take 30-40min downtime to your wireless.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/fus_rn_1_7_0_0.html
    The version I have given is the one most people including TAC would recommend
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Major issues after upgrading from XP to Vista on Qosmio F20

    I have recently upgraded from XP to Vista on my Qosmio F20 and have issues. It appears I have lost the ability to change screen resolutions, adjust the volume , brightness etc. Basically I have lost the functions of the laptop. I have also tried updating the BIOS but get the following error message "BiOS updated is not supported OS - Unsupported OS or service pack installed.
    This is also making the machine very slow.

    Do you have some questions now, or you wrote just a report about your Vista experience on Qosmio F20?
    The fact is that Toshiba does not support Vista on this notebook model and because of that you will never have full operating Vista (including Toshiba tools and utilities). For supported notebooks Toshiba has offered special Vista supporting BIOS but for your notebook such BIOS update does not exist.
    Sorry! :(

  • Bluetooth issue after upgrading from windows 8.1 to windows 10

    i upgraded from windows 8.1 to windows 10 , The experience was really nice and windows 10 work beautifully of my system. But the only thing is i am not able to find Bluetooth in my system. May be some driver issue. I have troubleshooted many times but the problem as not been solved . So any one can please help me on this. 

    On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:34:40 +0000, Field Commander A9 wrote:
    In-place upgrading from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 will cause all desktop internet browsers to be unable to open any non-local web pages. You'll have to use netsh to reset the winsock stack to fix this.
    Not necessarily. I've upgraded several systems here, ranging from tablets
    to laptops to virtual machines with a combination of IE, Chrome, and
    FireFox and I've not experienced this on a single system. Also, your post
    is the first time I've seen this issue reported in the forums.
    Paul Adare - FIM CM MVP
    The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard. -- BSD
    fortune
    Nah, the problem is that it doesn't have enough chlorine. -- Lionel in ASR
    It also lacks an undertow for the weak ones. -- Joe Creighton in ASR

Maybe you are looking for