Reporting Restrictions

Hi All,
I am working on a report and in report designer I have taken Customer Account Number ,Account Type,Posting key, Doc Type,Posting Date, G/L Account and Type of Payment.
Now I want to see only 3 Doc.Types
Only few Customer Account Numbers
Only two Posting Keys
Two G/L Account Numbers
And Type of payment
and the Key figures.
Here for Type of Payment I have created an Info object as Form of Payment in BW and Under it I have created two attributes as Cash and Credit card B'coz User want to see the amount paid in which form.
So now when I execute the report its showing two forms cash and Credit card in two Columns as I added the attributes into the Report.
But in the two Columns headers are shown but the rest of the columns are showing as not assigned.
Please tell me how to resolve this ,
If any body is not able to get the Question then I wll write it in very clear.
Thanking Points wil be rewarded

Hi Yar,
Yah ur right am getting # not assigned.
I wll explain u
From r3 i have to take only 5 fields which i mentiond above
But in requirement there is an object called form of payment. For this I chose the field Type of Payment from R3.
Under the Form of Payment they want to see how the amount paid like in cash or credit card.
That means they want to see for each Customer how the amount has been paid or payable.
Ex: Customer No    Form of Pay    Doc Ty.    G/L acc.No     Recbleamount        Recved Amount
        1000003            Cash              UR          24116030      2,234,56,12              4,35,567,344
        1000045            Credit Card   DZ or SA    24116020      2,387,965,78            5,876,899,832
this is the requirement and for this I created all the five objects in BW and took 5 fields from R3 and for Form of Payment I created 2 attributes Cash and credit card and  Form this Form of payment I took a field from R3 called Type of Payment but am not getting anything instead of this #.
Please suggest me what to do
and i really thank u for ur time Bro's

Similar Messages

  • Report restricted to specific Cost Centers of a cost center group

    Dear Experts,
    can you tell me how to achieve the following goal:
    We want to have a report writer report restricted to one cost center group that can be chosen by the user, but only showing in the first column the cost centers starting with "1049" for example that are part of this group and in the second column the cost centers starting with "1039" that are part of the group and so on.
    As far as I know, if we insert a variable on cost center group, we cannot restrict the cost centers any further ... do you have an idea how to proceed?
    Thank you very much!!
    Thomas

    Try it with two sub groups in your main cost cente group, one for the first column, and on for the second column.

  • Absence report restricted to organisational unit

    Hi Experts,
    We want to make the absence report restricted to few org units.
    That is if we authorize a user to access the absence report, he/she should only be able to view for specific org units (say for A and B org unit).
    Can anyone pls help ?
    Many thanks.
    Best Regards,
    Kanika

    Hi Colin,
    Unfortunately, no images can be attached here ( a picture is worth 1000 words, they say) , but this is what I assume, you would require.
    You have organizational units. Lets say, ABC, DEF, GHI and XYZ.
    On clicking ABC , you need to show the details of ABC and on clicking DEF, you need to show the details of DEF.
    If so is the case, then this would be something similar to transaction WE19 where you click on the segment on the left hand side, and on the right hand side it shows you the details of the segment. Similarly you can have a column tree present, with the organisations present on the left hand side and on clicking the organisation, you can have the ALV list on the right hand side. The class used in this case is <b>CL_GUI_COLUMN_TREE</b>
    But when I re-read your post, I assume that you want to see all organisational unit at once. If so is the case, then you can use the function module <b>REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_APPEND</b>.
    Let me know if there is any part in this text, you are not clear of and also do let me know if this was useful and helpful to you.
    Regards,
    Subramanian V.

  • Reporting - restricted for profit center-wise

    Hi
    My client has two profit centers (1000 and 2000) in one company code. Both profit centers are totally independent. Now my client requirement is that when user of profit center 1000 runs AR01 (i.e. asset balances), he should be able to see assets only for his profit centers i.e. 1000. Asset of profit center 2000 should not appear in that report.
    In EHP 4, there is provision for Profit Center-wise document posting, change and display functionality. But i want to know if this profit center-wise authorization will work for asset balances report (AR01) and other assets reports also.
    Please help.
    Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Jan 1, 2012 5:43 PM

    K_PCA or authorization object for profit center is not check in assets report.
    In AR01 you cannot restrict the results to profit center as it is not checked in authorization . The fields which are checked are company code , Asset class and asset views.
    Hence you will have to lookup for alternatives like selection based on plant or cost center or responsible cost center etc.
    In case if the requirement is a show stopper then you will have to code the things in Enhancement points as there are no BADI or Exits available for the same .
    Cheers,
    Dewang

  • COPA - P& L report restriction

    We are planning to restrict this report by company code wise. We devloped the object based on company code also, But still we coudn't find any successful in our stratgey ..Where are the loop holes ? Please advice
    Thanks,
    J

    Hi,
    Use any stnadard report, e.g. S_ALR_87009712
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Reporting Restrictions by Cost centers

    Hi
    I have a cost center reporting role which has an object  K_CSKS where we maintain cost center values. Now we have a many CCs maintained for this object. SO manager of CC 100 can also see reports for CC 200 which we want to restrict. How can we restrict CC access for a user. I want to avoid creation of 100s of roles by each CC.

    Hello Vishwas,
    I suggest you to do  the following :
    each cost center belong to a cost center group. you can see the connections with transaction KS13.
    Anyway , to make the creation of this roles easier, you need that the fields KOSTKL (cost center) and the field RESPAREA (CO-OM Responsibility Area) will be in the ORGLEVEL area.
    when this fields are there , you create a master role with all the transaction that are needed to manager of CC.
    you create the first derive role with a specific cc or a cost center group which contain his cost centers .
    the second derive role is a copy of the first one and all you need to do is to update the new cc and the cost center group at the orglevel area.
    Regards,
    Haim Brauner

  • KSB1 report - restriction on line items displayed in output

    In the standard report KSB1(Actual cost line items for  Cost center) it displays selection cancelled after 5000 data records,is there way i could get all the records displayed for the period we select.Please advice.

    Hello,
    I know, its too late to post on this thread, but I'm also facing the same issue while downloading the data from KSB1 report to my spreadsheet.
    Could you please help out, how you get rid of this issue. Thanks in advance.
    -Vishal

  • Ibot report restricted to display Limited records

    Hi Gurus,
    Pl help me in understanding this ibot report , when i run this report in analytics, i can get the full data, however when i schedule this report, not able to get that full report ithat i receive thru email. It is limited to 250 records in ibot pdf that i receive. Is there any where that i can increase the size of the records ( FULL ) that i receive the ibots???
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Please check below thread. It could be of some help.
    i-bot not emailing when report returns large result set..
    Thanks,
    Vijay

  • Report Restrictions

    Hi All,
    I am working on a report and in report designer I have taken Customer Account Number ,Account Type,Posting key, Doc Type,Posting Date, G/L Account and Type of Payment.
    Now I want to see only 3 Doc.Types
    Only few Customer Account Numbers
    Only two Posting Keys
    Two G/L Account Numbers
    And Type of payment
    and the Key figures.
    Here for Type of  Payment I have created an Info object as Form of Payment in BW and Under it I have created two attributes as Cash and Credit card B'coz User want to see the amount paid in which form.
    So now when I execute the report its showing two forms cash and Credit card in two Columns as I added the attributes into the Report.
    But in the two Columns headers are shown but the rest of the columns are showing as not assigned.
    Please tell me how to resolve this ,
    If any body is not able to get the Question then I wll write it in very clear.
    Thanking                          Points wil be rewarded

    I would suggest posting this in the BI Forum pages.
    People can tell you how to get this info via ABAP for example but if you are using BW and BI, then that forum is a better place to ask for help.

  • HR data administration and reporting - restricting access

    Hello All
    We have a single role for HR data adminsitrators.  There is no distinction on PA, PSA u2013 no further breakdown u2013 everyone gets to see everything and they have access to change everything.  How may we restrict access?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi,
    Please let me know if you are using Structural authorizations.
    For non-structural security, without any breakdown on PA, PSA, EE groups/subgroups, you may use Organizational key (VDSK1 field of Auth object P_ORIGIN) to restrict the data access.
    In the standard configuration, the field is filled with the values of Personnel Area and Cost Center.In Customizing activity, you can set up Organizational Key and define your own rules for the field.  Ex: Organizational Key with an employeeu2019s Organizational Unit and Cost Center. It can be configured to include any of the data from Infotype 0001 (Organizational Assignment) within HR.
    The Organizational Key essentially provides an additional user-defined field to be used for security restrictions.
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks,
    Sandipan

  • PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

    All,
    Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
    However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
    The help message says:
    The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
    However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
    Many Thanks,
    Colm

    Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
    are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
    Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
    I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
    u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
    renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
    materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
    contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
    processing under contract.
    u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
    cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
    intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
    manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
    transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
    What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
    subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
    (Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
    generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
    For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
    statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
    German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
    (nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
    and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
    intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
    (Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
    under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
    If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
    (e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
    materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
    statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
    transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
    commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
    products.
    Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
    of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
    imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
    Examples:
    1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
    car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
    purchased by the domestic contractor.
    As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
    which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
    2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
    provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
    complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
    gearbox unit.
    This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
    with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
    u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
    3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
    provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
    the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
    emblem mounted on the vehicle.
    Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
    emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
    purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
    4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
    conserving).
    This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
    the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
    movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

  • Calquarter from posting period in reporting level

    Hi Guys,
    We don't have the calquater in cube level.But in reporting
    we need to calculate the calquarter from posting period.
    My requirement is, when user enters the posting period 5 it
    should show the quarter 1 and quarter 2 values. If user
    enters posting period 7 it shoold show the qua1,qua2 and
    qua3 values.
    Can any one suggest me how we can get this?
    Helpful answers will be rewarded with full points.
    Prasad

    Hello,
    Create 4 variables (range) on Posting period for eg. qtr1 , qtr2, qtr3, qtr4 of type Customer Exit. Now Create 4 Restricted Keyfigures for the Key figure u want to display each restricted with posting period by qtr1 , qtr2, qtr3, qtr4.
    Now write the code to fill in these variables depending on the User entry value. so for eg, if user enters 5, then fill
    qtr1 with low value 001 and high value 003 of the same year as input value.
    qtr2 with low value 004 and high value 005 (input value) of the same year.
    as you dont want to show qtr 4 and qtr 5, fill them with some period for which you are sure there would be no values in the cube (may be some period in past or dummy year like 9999). You can then eliminate these columns by suppress zero value columns.
    Similarly write the logic for all 12 periods to fill corresponding Qtr1 to Qtr 4. So in report Restricted KF will show KF value resricted to corresponding Qtr
    Thanks

  • FI - Restrict Open periods

    I am implementing FICO and we already have deployed FIGL in our company. I need to restrict open periods from displaying. I am not sure whether I should restrict at the extraction or bring in the open periods and restrict based on T001B table in ECC which stores the open and closed periods at a given point. looking for the best solution if someone has implemented this.

    Hi,
    BI system is a common system used for reporting the R3 system data. Hence it is always advisable to pull all the data to BI and at report level you can filter on those data.
    In the Reporting cube level add a field called ZPeriod apart from 0FISCPER you have , Add an attribute Validity to this Zperiod infoobject maintain them with status fields like O for Open Periods C for Closed Periods.
    In the report restrict the Validity field with C for getting only closed periods data.
    ZPERIOD infobject has to updated with status daily from T001b from ECC system so that attribute will always have correct periods and their validity status. This is a good and dyanmic method of solution which can be used at report level.
    All these loads automate thro process chain so that no manual activity will be available.
    Dont go for filtering of data and if some other users need FIGL data as of today for validating or tallying it becomes difficult.
    Hope this helps for you.
    Thanks,
    Arun

  • How to move all the standard and adhoc reports from cube to multi provider

    How to move all the standard and adhoc reports from the basic cube to multi provider?
    i created this multiprovider to do the maintenence on the basic cube. for example the infocube physical partition, line item dimension and compression.
    what we decided to do is move all the Standard and ad-hoc reports from the basic cube to the multiprovider. How to do it? and make a copy of the basic cube and do the maintenence on the cube. please help.
    Thanks in advance sdn experts!

    Hi Les,
    This sounds good and one thing we try to always keep in mind when undertaking such activities is to always minimise the impact to the user and make the process as transparent to them as possible. So lets say you have your multiprovider and copied queries up in Prod, these queries will still pick up the data from the base cube.
    Now you need to make a copy of the base cube for some changes to the cube model, I would suggest that you copy the cube and make your changes on the copied cube itself. Then 9depending on the changes done) you can load data from Original Cube to New Cube. When this is being done, make sure that you change your queries to add a restriction on 0INFORPOV by Original Cube.
    After the load to the new cube is complete you can run reports restricted to each cube to verify the numbers. Then change the 0INFOPROV restriction in the queries to point to the New Cube and disengage the old cube from the multiprovider.
    Hope this helps...

  • Restrict Query By Cost Centre

    I have a number of users who recieve a budget report. The query in the report is restricted by a variable on Cost Centre. There is an authorisation logged against the user in RSECADMIN for cost centre so when the report runs it knows they only have authorisation to view budgets for that specific cost centre.
    However I want to design another report that shows overtime spend for all cost centres. If I give the users authority to view overtime spend for all cost centres the budget report restriction fails e.g. they have now got access to all cost centres and see all budgets.
    Is there anyway around this?

    In that case it is very simple and yes you can separate both authorizations.
    In RSECADMIN built two authorizations:
    Aut_1:
    Cost_center: only the cost centers the user should have
    0TCAACTVT: 03 (display only)
    0TCAIPROV: <The_InfoProvider_the_query_restricted_by_only_some_profit_centers_in_here>
    0TCAKYFNM: * (all key figures)
    0TCAVALID: * (Valid for ever)
    Aut_2:
    Cost_center: * (all cost centers)
    0TCAACTVT: 03 (display only)
    0TCAIPROV: <The_InfoProvider_the_query_restricted_by_all_profit_centers_in_here>
    0TCAKYFNM: * (all key figures)
    0TCAVALID: * (Valid for ever)
    Give both authorizations to the user. When the user opens the query built on the InfoProvider that exist in Aut_1, the system will retrieve the Aut_1 authorizations values, therefore, only some Cost Centers.
    When the user opens the query built on the InfoProvider that exist in Aut_2, the system will retrieve the Aut_2 authorizations values, therefore, all Cost Centers.
    This is because, the systema builds union on 0TCAIPROV characteristic. If they are different, then, different values are granted as you wish.
    Diogo.

Maybe you are looking for