Reports not matching

Hi Group,
The actuals standard line item report FMRP_RFFMEP1AX / program RFFMEPGAX does not have the same dollar value for purchase requisitions as the budget report FMRP_2FMB4002 / program RFMDUMON
Any ideas or suggestions? Please let me know
Thanks,

We started having this problem with some of the reps after migrating from the old CAD servers to new CAD servers. Since the new system didn’t have the updated RASCAL DB, I thought the reports have the stale data. I was under the impression that it gets cleared after a day(once CSD has a fresh data) but seems like that’s not the case. I didn’t get time to look into this further and have requested TAC to help me on this.
-Sunil

Similar Messages

RE: COPA report and customer line item report not matching

Hi All,
COPA report and customer line item reports (fd10n) are not matching please let me know the reason.

ok

Trial Balance - Encumbrance & Encumbrance Details Report not matching

Hi,
Our client has recently raised one issue saying Trial Balance - Encumbrance with 'Obligation' parameter and Encumbrance Details Report (both reports period name and Enc Date to choosen as FEB-12 and 29-Feb-2012).
The final totals related to both reports does not match and why could be such difference occuring between the two reports. As both reports logically dealing with Enumbrance one at PO level and another one at GL level. And po transactions have been transferred to GL.
Please explaing how to search those records which are showing these differences in main report.
Appreciate in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
This seems to be due to the rounding issue in the database.
Can you check and confirm whether any time during the business process, in the system the decimal settings were increased or decreased ? If yes, then it can be due to the calculation (rounding)
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Report not matching FBL5N & FBL1N ? ? ? ? ?

Dear All
Experts ,
Facing one problem that our customer is our vendor too and for that we do refer FBL5N & FBL1N.
It is required in according to that both reports must matched. But once the user reverse one document and it is
not showing in FBL1N report while FBL5N showing right balances and transaction figures.
What may be the reason for not showing one reversal ?
Experts please help.
Regards,
Pankaj.

Hi
Kolipara.
If I check those boxes will it solve my problems ?
How to deal with the earlier posted entries ? The difference is around Rs.20,000/- and if I again reverse the document
the effect will take place at both side and difference will be same as earlier.
So I want to rectify that issue.
further all transaction will manage by ticking those boxes but earlier are much problem either.
And I checked the masters of my other vendor and customer who are same in those, there boxes are unicked but
still balances are matching . . . How so ?
Can you please put a focus on it !
Regards,
Pankaj.

Report not matching

Hi,
We have created a customized report for "Totals by posting key for trade account". When we match the figure of the report with FS10N for a particular month, the difference is going beyond 1 million.
Can anyone help me in where to check to find the different. In QAT, the figures are matching but in PRD is not matching.
Any advice/suggestion/solution is appreciated.
thanks

Use tcode SE16. Put your table name in. Start of with BSIS(open) then move on to BSAS(cleared). Put in you parameters Company code, account and period. You will get a list of all the GL postings. Compare that to a list produced by you custom program. You will need details from your custom report in order to find the differences. Start off with a day or some small sample.
Points assigned are appreciated.

Trial balance reports not matching (F.08 & S_PL0_86000030 / S_PL0_86000028)

Hi,
I'm facing an issue with the trial balance, while running the T.Codes S_PL0_8600028/30 and F.08. The balancing figure as per s_pl0_86000028/30 is say for example 66890 and the balance as per F.08 is 66853 for the fiscal year 2008.
In both the cases the balances as per the debit and credit sides are the same i.e., the trial balance is matching repectively in each of the cases.
In fact, in the company we have been using S_PL0_86000030/28, however there is an issue of amount being seen in the account Inter Segment Clearing or PRofit Center Clearing account.
And so, as an alternative I'm trying to use the T.Code F.08 where the issue of Inter segement clearing is not there, however there is a mismatch between the balancing figures of the above stated reports.
There is the above mentioned mismatch where the total balance even after excluding the Inter segement clearing account (GL account) and running the reports exists
Please share some insights on the same.
Regards
Soujanya.

Hi,
Yes. I do have the amounts by which it is differening between each of the respective GL accounts. The point is, the amounts that show the difference are the closing balances and so to identify the particular transaction for the amounts is quite challenging.
In fact, I've tried running F.51 for each of the GL accounts, however over the year there are places where similar amounts are posted for more than one time.
Like, if there is an amount of XYZ that is showing up the difference for a particular GL, then when I try to filter on that basis then I can see this XYZ amounts for 5 times in the whole year. To drill down to the right amount is where I'm facing an issue.
Regards
Soujanya

F.01 & KE80 Report not match Value

Hi Expert,
We have made KE80 report as well F.01 FSV but while check both T.Code F.01 is giving Correct Information but Ke80 report giving Less amount then F.01. note : I have copied from KE5B as advice by Ravi Sankar Veena posted date 4th of June 2009.
but value is still same, wht should i do in this case. in F.01 m unable to access Dril Down Report. kindly help me.
Regards
Pranav

Hi Pranav
Blessed are those who have FI / EC-PCA reconciled
Even SAP has accepted in one of it notes that PCA is not intended to reconcile with FI.. Reasons are many and this thread would fall short for it..
For P&L accounts - It would reconcile because PC is derived from CO objects like CC.. So, where your GL is a cost element, you can relax
For B/S accounts - Its a night mare. Especially, when you do F.5D, there is no guarantee that the Splitted amount would match the original amount
Because of these reasons, New GL PCA was introduced
Br. Ajay M

Cross Tab Report not matching Data from report

I created a report showing the number of orders created by each department per year for the last 5 years. I double checked the data, and 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 all are correct.
I then created a cross-tab for quick reference for my department head. 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 are all correct. 2008 is not. It shows 500 more orders than the data in the report for that year.
I double checked my "Group options" to make sure that they were the same in both the data and in the crosstabs. Any idea what I could be missing?
Thank you.

Try this, limit the report to only 2008, show details, add date to detail section, and add the record number (From special fields)
see if this count matches what you think it should be, or is 500 over like the crosstab indicates. You could group by date, by month, add a summary (Count) by date, and see what that comes up to. If your extra records fall in a certain date range, double check the database to make sure there are not duplicate records.

Missing Function - Aging Report not match in System Currency in SBO 8.8

Dear all,
Version: (Please provide the current version)
SBO 8.8 Patch: 10
Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
In mentioned patch level, the result/outstanding balance of Aging Report in System Currency was difference when selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' or not. The outstanding balance should be be same on both selection.
Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable)
N/A
Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
If the Aging Report cannot disppay the outstanding documetns for reconcile with customer, they cannot check with customers.
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
Generate the Aging report in System Currency
selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' including all transactions and balance is same as Trail Balance
un-selected 'Display Receoncilied Transactions' does not inclding the transactions that Local Currency is zero amount, but System Currency is not zero. The outstanding balance is different to the result of the above selection and Trail Balance as well.
Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
Print the Aging Report with selected ' Display Reconcilied Transactions' to show ALL transactions to reconcile the transactions.
Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
selected 'Display Reconciled Transactions' or not, the outstanding balance should be the same.
Best regards,
Michael

Bapi's do not set sy-subrc. The only way to check if it was succesfull is to loop into the return table for error messages:
You have to use BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT after calling BAPI_PO_CREATE1:
    READ TABLE errmsg TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
                        WITH KEY type = c_e.
    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
        EXPORTING
          wait = c_x.
ENDIF.

Historical reports not matching supervisor desktop "Calls Presented" totals.

Have UCCX 9.X version of Supervisor Desktop. When viewing the “Agents – Team Summary” from within Supervisor Desktop the “Calls Presented” and “Calls Handed” totals seem to be cumulative from more than the past day. The Supervisor Desktop User’s guide states that the totals should be from 12:00 AM thru the current day. I’ve looked through Supervisor Desktop “Preferences” and could not find anything to change to give the past days totals only. When a supervisor runs a Historical Report for the day the totals are correct. When they’re in Supervisor Desktop the totals for each agent are hundreds more than what the Historical Report states. Is there a parameter I’m missing somewhere to allow Supervisor Desktop to give the current days totals only?
Thanks!

We started having this problem with some of the reps after migrating from the old CAD servers to new CAD servers. Since the new system didn’t have the updated RASCAL DB, I thought the reports have the stale data. I was under the impression that it gets cleared after a day(once CSD has a fresh data) but seems like that’s not the case. I didn’t get time to look into this further and have requested TAC to help me on this.
-Sunil

Stock in MC.9 and MB5B not matching

Hi,
I am getting stock in MC.9 report and stock in MB5B report not matching for a perticular storage location in a perticular peiod.
Can anyone please help me what may be the reason that both report showing different quantity and value where as both are standard reports.
Waiting for a quick response.
Prasant

Hello,
The stock of MC.9 reflects the complete stock at plant level. It includes also the sock of material which one is send to vendor.(Subcontracting) You can also cross check through MMBE in which stock prov. to vendor is different.
While MB5B had three radio buttons for stock type.
1 - Storage loc/Batch stock - which not include the materials provided to vendor.
2 - Valuated stock - - Total valuated stock as per your selection crieteria.
3 - Special stock -- all the special stock such as subcontracting/pipeline/consignment.
If you click on Valuated radio button and execute it, you will get same stock under head Closing stock and the value will same as the value in MC.9
--Just click Valuated stock radio button.
RGDS
Rajan

GRIR not match GL account wise

Dear All,
i have used report MR11 posting date 31.03.2009 & PO date 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 & last movement key date 31.03.2009 with plant wise.
i got balance 23corode but when i choose GRIR gls & take report from FI with t-code FAGLL03 i got balance 27corade.
my worry is these two report not matching why difference come. please guide me.
Thanks
Shital

Hi
FI reports are company codewise. Use the dynamic selection option - plant in FI report and then compare both the reports. Then both should match.
Thanks

Aging Report does not match Balance Sheet Receivables/Payables Account

Hi experts,
I am requesting your help to find out why our customer receivables/vendor payables aging reports total does not match our balance sheet accounts receivable/ accounts payable account for the same period.
I would expect
Customer Receivables Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Receivables Account
Vendor Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Payables Account
Thank you.
Jane

When you run the report with an ending/aging date in the past (like the end of last month), if you do not display BP's with zero balances, it will leave out BP's who have a zero balance AT THE TIME YOU RUN THE REPORT. Some of them may have had a non-zero balance at the end of the month, but they will be left off anyway. So if a customer owed money on the last day of the month and he paid it on the first of the next month, his balance will not be shown on the report if you run it even one day later.
I feel this is a design defect in the report, but it is the system behavior.
Marcia

FD10N and FBL5N Reports are not matching

Hi,
When i execute FD10N FBL5N reports for customer balance, Both are showing different balances, why they are not matching with each other?
My FBL5N open item blance is not matching with FD10N.what could be the reason?
Is there any other report to show customer opening balances other than FD10N?
thaanks

Dear Dogdays
This is selection parameters problems- means please check once again what you selected check boxes and also check for Dates what you given
To check both the above cases, FD10N for the year you see the difference. Double click on the balance value for the period where you have seen the difference. The double click will call FBL5N for the period and customer. If the total of the line item report matches the balance in FD10N, then the issue is selection criteria
Regards
shankar

Inventory audit report and Inventory GL balance - Not matching

Team
I taken the report from Inventory audit report , this is not matching with inventory charts of accounts balance.
What may be the error
How to close old topics, how to provide the points for good suggestion. My points also not increased , what I need to do increase my points.
Thanks
Anantha Desai

Hi,
1. Please check if any manual JE posted to that GL account
2. How to close old topics
There are two way close discussions:
----> If you got right answer, you can choose "correct answer" option in replies.
----> If you get an idea or suggestions, you can choose "Helpful answers" and need to close manually by choosing "Assumed answered:.
how to provide the points for good suggestion
Please choose "helpful answer" and "Like" option for good suggestions
My points also not increased , what I need to do increase my points.
Points will be increased, if you provide right suggestions, ideas and answers to other member discussion.
Refer this document for further details:
http://scn.sap.com/community/support/blog/2013/04/03/how-to-close-a-discussion-and-why
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Reports not matching

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for