Request owner approval in Transport Workflow (DEV to QTY)

Hello,
I have set up the transport workflow between DEV and QTY systems on ERP6.
I need to allow developers and consultants to approve their own transport proposals in order to facilitate transport to the QTY system.
Currently, when an user releases a transport request and creates a transport proposal, the approval message is sent to the TMS Worklist.
Therefore, only administrators can approve transport proposals.
How to allow users to approve and import their own requests through the Transport Proposal Inbox in Transport Organizer (SE10) ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Serguei,
Please check whether you have specified &_WF_INITIATOR& as excluded agent.
Please remove &_WF_INITIATOR& as excluded agent.
With Best Regards
Julia

Similar Messages

CUP 5.3 (SP11) Risk Owner Approval in CUP workflow

Hello Experts,
I have a question...
When you create a risk in RAR, is there any way you can send an approval request automatically to a Risk Owner already set in RAR?
Unfortunately, there is no such option for risk in the CUP custom approver determinator.
We want to set risk owners different from business process owners,* and risk owners are the ones responsible for risk approval.
*We don't want to set the "business process" as an approver determinator.
I would appreciate your advice.
HM

When you create a risk in RAR, is there any way you can send an approval request *automatically* to a Risk Owner already set in RAR?
- CUP (Page 19/33)?
Unfortunately, there is no such option for risk in the CUP custom approver determinator.
There is - Request Type - Attribute
Please have a look at the following document to create RISK (RAR) approval workflows in CUP (Page 19/33 - CAD):
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e03cd86c-3aa7-2a10-1aa6-e845902f555d?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Himadama

SAP "Z" Script Transport from DEV -- TO-- QTY Server

Experts....
We have created a Z SAP Script. in DEVELOPMENT CLIENT : 100
We have successfully transported the changes from DEVELOPMENT CLIENT to UNIT TESTING CLIENT 120 in the same system thru SCC1.
UNIT TESTING RESULTS are OK, and our DEVELOPER has given a request to import into production.
But we imported the request, But changes are not reflecting in QUALITY.
I found below thread but i failed to understand...the last steps...
Can any one please help in this regard.
SAP Script transport issue
Rgds

Finally.....We could able to close this....
Weunderstood....to do inital fill in target client we do it from "000" clinet to "XXX" target clinet
once it is available ..the rest all goes with CLASSIC TRANSPORT APPROACH.
Not sure why the inital Transport request with changed did nor worked.
With the help of ABAP Expert...we just reactivated the in SE71 and added into request
imported the request into Quality & Worked..
When the inital fill is completed for SAP Standard ,
the rest of changes to is managed thru SAP Classic Transport Method.
For "Z" script..even no where connected with "000" client.
As we fixed with above assumptions...we conclude as above....
i request any expert to correct us if our assumptions in wrong direction.
Rgds

OIM11g - Approval Workflow - Requester and Approver is same

Hi All,
I have a scenario where , requests are approved by a group. ( Resource Owners group).
and if anyone needs access to this resource, the members of the group will approve the requests.
What if any member of the "Resource Owners" groups raises a request on the same object ?? OIM functionally sends it to the group for approval, and it will become a self approval and is a conflict.
How to avoid this kind of scenarios.
Regards
Vicky
Edited by: vicky on Dec 7, 2011 5:18 AM

AFAIK I haven't seen any system property to stop this. SOA does not care about who the requester is and who are the approvers. The way Oracle has impletmented the identity service for OIM in SOA does not handle this. Seems there is no SOD checks. Open a SR which I believe should be taken as a ER.
Thus the workaround would be to get all the members of the approver group less the requester and assign to all the members. The member list should be comma seperated user ids.
HTH,
BB

Travel Request Approval Scenario via Workflow does not trigger

Hi guys,
System Information: SAP ECC 6.0 EHP4 / Using WDA-Scenarios on Portal NW 7.01.
I'm having trouble understanding/implementing the approval scenario of the Travel Request via Workflow/UWL. POWL isn't usable for us as it isn't flexible enough to process the complex agent assignment rules for the respective approver our (momentarily..) requirements 'dictate' ...
What I did so far:
I copied the Workflow Template 200000040 to a custom template (since I'll have to alter it) and activated the Event of Creation for BUS2089. Thus, in SWE2, the respective entry for BUS2089 for the event CREATED has been set by the system. All good so far. When I create a TRIP via PR05 (we are public sector), the event for BUS2089 gets fired in SAPMP56T and the Workflow gets triggered; works out well. However, when I post a travel request in Portal (FITE_REQUEST), the workflow is not getting triggered. I searched for information or similar questions on the forum but didn't find anything. Neither did I find a concrete clue in the View Containers FITE_VC_* etc..
Could anyone assist me with this? I'm sure I'm missing something very basic here.... -_-
Bottom line:
Why is my workflow not getting triggered from creating travel requests via FITE_REQUEST?
Cheers, Lukas

SWE2 linkage is activated for my Workflow number (I didn't do it by hand, it's set by the system since I activated the event in my workflowtemplate --> this way actually no inconsistencies can happen).
SWDD Tests are successful and the Workflow is working well in general. That's why I pointed out in my previous post that the process is working fine when initiated via PR05.
EDIT: Or maybe somebody knows the part in coding FITV_FPM/FITE_VC* where the workflow should be triggered? It's freaking unfindable, I've been debugging for hours. >:-(
EDIT: Debugged the entire WDA Frmaework for like five hours...feeling dead inside...someone please tell me from where the workflow gets triggered when saving travel request from portal -_-....
Edited by: Lukas Weigelt on Dec 5, 2011 2:55 PM
Edited by: Lukas Weigelt on Dec 5, 2011 7:14 PM

Approval procedure in Transport Workflow

Hi,
I configured transport workflow QA approval procedure. When i approve the proposal it is getting imported into QA automatically. I want to approve but let somebody else to move the transport manually.
How do i do this?
Also once its moved to QA and tested fine how is the approval to PRD handled using transport workflow?
Please advice.

HI Shannon,
Did you happen to get a solution ?
We also have a requirement where we only want the approvers to approve them. The transports should not be automatically imported in production.
When the proposals are approved, the transports are automatically imported.We do not want this to happen.
We want to do it manually at a particular time.
Regards
Bharathwaj

Transport Request for creating Organisation structure in DEV and Quality.

Dear Gurus,
I have a issue regarding transport request creation for creating organisation structure.
My client has their own basis team, Iam doing the customization in Dev server, when iam creating organsiation structure in dev server ( Easy Access) iam unable to generate transport request, Their basis team is saying that no transport request is created in easy access.
My question is weather transport request is to be generated in Dev (Gloden client) for creating organsiation structure or not. Please guide me.

Hi Ravi,
You can try report RHMOVE00.
It is up to you to either maintain the org structure in dev server and tranport to quality or maintain it directly in quality.
Regards,
Dilek

SCMA create transport request: Suggested request owner is wrong

Hi,
When we try to create a transport request via SCMA the suggested request owner is not the user executing the create request itself but the user who created the project some time ago. Eventhough this user can be changed this leads to wrongly assigned transport requests.
Since project creation number of users have been added to the project in solar_project_admin but they are not taken into account.
We already did try creating a new task list for the project but that did not work.
Any ideas how to solve this?
thanks
Tom

Hi Tom,
Normally it is done via action Create Transport Request in the SDHF/SDMI document.
There are certain advantages of it.....for e.g..u can create a task if u want to have mulitple changes and can assign multiple developers
Try this it will solve ur problem
Regards
Prakhar

How to find a Transport Request no for Task or Workflow Template

Hi All,
Any body tell me.
How to find a Transport Request No for Task or Workflow Template.
Thanks,
Lakhshmi.

Hi.
Next to the options already mentioned you can also try transaction SE03.
Select: Search for objects in Requests/Tasks.
Next, fill an empty line with the objectnumber you want to search (don't forget the checkbox).
For workflow tasks use the object type PDTS, for workflow templates use PDWS.
Kind regards,
Jasper Blok

Approval for transports to Production

Hi,
I posted this in ERP and dint get a reply so i am posting here.
I configured transport workflow QA approval procedure. When i approve the proposal it is getting imported into QA automatically. I want to approve but let somebody else to move the transport manually.
How do i do this?
Also once its moved to QA and tested fine how is the approval to PRD handled using transport workflow?
Please advice.

Hi Shannon,
Apologies could not reply earlier.. I think this is one of the drawbacks of transport workflow as suggested in the link below:
[Transport Workflow|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/5a/34bd66c03d11d2851c0000e8a57770/content.htm]
Please check from the 2nd paragraph onwards.
Regardless of anything the sequence is the change owner's responsibilty. Even if mass transport option was invoked and the transports were released in wrong sequence then you would get this error in case of auto imports. Manual imports where you have a sequence control check is helpful but tedious business. I think the onus is one transport owners to ensure that the sequence of transport requests is correct in transport proposal in case of TMS workflow and in case of mass transports the transports are released in correct sequence.
Coming to the QA approval step I believe that TMS workflow and QA approval are separate in the sense the individual transport and not the proposal gets approved. However I would really suggest ythat ou check with SAP itself on that .
Regards.
Ruchit Khushu

Activating the transport workflow...

Hi,
We want to automate the import of requests in our production system, so we plan to activate the workflow in TMS. After an approval procedure requests will be imported automatically in our landscape. We're running a SAP landscape with 3 systems: DEV (development) -> TST (test/QA) -> PRD (Production). We're using an approval procedure in TST, the QA list. We don't want developers to import requests directly in PRD.
Questions that appear:
- I'm only interested in control the transport in the production system, not in the test system. Is it possible to configure the environment where the transport from DEV -> TST continues as usual ( default values ) and E30/TST -> PRD with the workflow.
- Is it possible to schedule any job to import approved requests only at concrete times ?
Any other feedback ?
Regards,
Joan

Moved to Workflow forum

Risk Owners approval using ABAP Function class

Dear All
I have implemented ABAP function class ZCL_GRAC_WFA_RISK_OWNER to identify the risk owners once the role approval is done, the Workflow is working fine with one exception.
My scenario is like this - i have mapped P059 risks to PR risk approver coming from PR role, S007 risks is mapped to SD risk approver coming from SD role, so when the role owner have approved both the roles, i would like to send seperate risk approval requests to 2 diff risk approvers as per my mapping.
But currently P059 & S007 risks are routed to both approvers at the same time & when one of them approves the risks - both risks get approved & provisioning is taking place.
i would like 2 risk approval to be put in place - any idea on how to acheive this?
Naveen

Dear Hari
Thanks for your response.. Yes i have implemented the note 1670504..
As mentioned earlier i have checked my Risk approval Stage setting with both options "ALL APPROVERS" & "ANY ONE APPROVER"
but still when one of the risk owner approves all the risks are get approved & the provisioning is completed.
PFA
Do let me know if you have any more options.
Naveen

Re: Transport Workflow Confirguration

Hi friends,
Presently we are using Queue Controlled Transport Strategy for our R/3 4.7 system landscape. We are planning to replace the Queue Controlled Transport Strategy with Workflow Controlled Transport Strategy. My question is " Can we configure tp approval levels in Workflow Controlled Strategy like from enduser(tp owner)->Functional Lead (approver)--> Basis Administrator automatically?"
Any help would be highly appreciated
Thanks,
Krishna

Hi Krishna,
I'm not quite sure I'm reading your question correctly, so maybe I need to retune my answer later.
This is a quote from the help files:
<i>By default, there are 3 system-wide approval steps and the step Approved by system administrator is active.
You can also define other steps in addition to the default approval steps. If you define additional approval steps and have configured more than one QA system, you can determine if the additional steps are to be system-/client-specific (only one QA system) or cross-system/client (global).</i>
As you can see you would need to activate the enduser and departmental approval in order to fulfill your requirements.
I hope I have answered your question.
Best regards,
Alexander

Transport Workflow / Send Mail

Hi Experts,
I want to send email automatically to the person is going to aprove the change request for release strategy in transport workflow.
I made configuration for service desk but now I want to do it for this.
Any clue?

At which point do you send the mail? After approval or as a notification for the task? If you want to send a notification to the approver for new workitems you can use program RSWUWFML2 or if you are on ECC Extended notifications. If you want to send an e-mail after approval you can get the agent from the workitem. After it is executed the user who executed the workitem is stored in WIACTUAL_AGENT in the task, you can bind this to a container element in the workflow.
Regards,
Martin

Transport workflow engine

Hello SAP Gurus,
We are new to this transport workflow automation process. We are currently testing this in sandbox (S00).
S00 has multiple clients. Each client represents one country (example - client 200 represents Belgium,
201 represents France, 202 represents Mexico, 250 represents USA etc).
Each client have different Developers/functionals/infosecs/users.
As only one Workflow engine can be defined per instance(S00)/client (250) under STMS --> systems overview -->transport domain --> workflow engine tab we have below issues.
Users from other countries cannot able to approve/reject/import their transport proposals - reason being
their user id is not created in 250.
Is there any options to create seperate workflow engine per client? or how can we do this for other countries without enabling CUA or maintaining all users at one client(workflow engine client).
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated,
thanks & best regards,
Kannappan.S

Hi Kannappan
You need to this way. Even i follow the same way. Here 200 and 400 clients are customizing clients. I will develope workflows in 300 client after developing i will transport the workflow from 300 to 400 then from 400 only i can transport to quality and to production.
You can also do the same way. From differents clients move to 250 from 250 you can transport to quality and to production. No need to move any users.
To move the transport request from different client to 250 do this way. go to 250 client and opent the transport fron SE01 and double click on the partent request id and do a small change in the description and save it. This will do the transport from different client to 250.
Regards
vijay

Request owner approval in Transport Workflow (DEV to QTY)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for