Requirement of displaying inspection method in result recording

Dear All,
My clients requirement is to have the inspection method code in the result recording screen. I have the option of inspection method short text in the result recording screen. But i want a code should appear so that user can see the same for his convinient reference.
Regards,
Anil

Dear Anil,
You can create attachment in word of whatever data you want to maintain for inspection method. you can also save drawings in this attachment. assign this attachment to inspection method .You can assign attachment by
Service for Object=> Create=>Create Attachment
Now this attachment u can view while doing result recording & parallaly u can record results. Hope this will help you.
Regards
Amit

Similar Messages

In-process inspection- operation wise result recording sequence

Hello Everyone,
I have just come across a requirement and would be grateful if someone can help me out in this regard.
1.     This is make to stock discrete manufacturing scenario.
2.     Inspection type 03 has been activated in material master.
3.     The setting in OPK4 are, error if no inspection results exist and error when operation sequence is not adhered to.
4.     As a result of which I cannot confirm the operation in CO11N unless result recording is done for corresponding operation.
The requirement,
1.     User should not be able to carry out result recording for operation 30 unless at least 1 quantity of operation 20 (preceding operation) is confirmed. Likewise it should behave for rest of the operations.
2.     Practically material is processed for operation 30 only if 20 is confirmed. Therefore operation 30 should be inspected after 20. System allows to input result recording for all the operations irrespective its confirmations.
Is there any standard solution for this or should I go for any exit?
Thank you,
Anand Rao

Hi Sujit,
Thanks for so prompt response.
I am using inspection point 100. Still it is not restricting. The operation confirmation is done through CO11N and not feasible for users to perform it through QM module.
The logic is, if I try to carry out result recording for operation 30 , system should firstly check whether any confirmation number exists or (at least 1 quantity is confirmed)for previous operation i.e. 20. If not it must stop doing RR for 30 operation.
Whether exits QEEM0011 and QEEM0015 can restrict this, as by their description I think these work after entering RR. Here it is required before RR. Any guesses?
Thank you again for your kind reply.
Regards,
Anand
An addition,
Even though QEEM0011 works before valuation user is able to enter RR. The requirement is user should not enter the any RR irrespecive of valuation. If user enters RR and do not valuate it this exit may not work and eventually can allow to confirm OP30.
Edited by: Anand Rao on Aug 24, 2011 1:21 PM

Reset inspection plan after results recording

Dear all,
i had one problem to be cleared, if u can please solve it.
My problem is i have assigned wrong inspection plan for one insp. lot, and i have recorded results and saved. My question is there any provision that i can reset the other inspection plan for that particular lot and record resullts again.

Hi Vijay,
Goto QA11/QA12 Change Udage Decision enter the inspection lot number and select Usage Decision -->Functions -->Cancel Lot.
Then cancel the Material Document by which the Inspection lot was created.
Then make the GR and new lot will be generated. Then assign the Inspection Plan, Results Recording.
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Inprocess Inspection & result recording

Hi all,
We are implementing QM.
The requirement of client is to carry out inprocess inspection(preferable without inspection plan) including result recording & defect recording & that to with quiet ease.
Help me with the basic settings.
Also to have the relevant report to analyse the inspection activities.
We are using developed T code for operation confirmation, in the back end it is co11n only. So also elaborate the consequences of the same if any.
Mangesh

Ramanuj/ Murali,
Thanks for your reply.
Let me explain the process in details.
We are having around 10 operations.
We need to carry out inprocess inspection for 8 operation starting from 3rd operation.
The inspection to be carried out is like length- 5 cms, shape- ok or not ok, if not ok then what is the defect, assay- 90%, if below 90% then defective like this.
I have assigned inspection type 03 in QM view in the material master.
Inspection lot is also getting created.
I am stuck up at result recording & defect recording.
So kindly guide me how to map this in details.
Efforts would be appreciated.
SmanS

Multiple results recording for Delivery inspection lot

Hi Gurus,
My requirement is to configure for quality results recording for sales delivery document. Where client wants to record Customer, supplier, Umpire, etc results record for inspection characteristics.
I got response from few Sapiens that I should use Inspection point concept for multiple results recording. Could anyone cna tell me how can I do this.
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
Okay!
First of all letu2019s try to understand whether inspection points are really suitable for your requirement or not. Accordingly further errors can be eliminated. I just try to understand.
A- Using Inspection Points
1.     Inspection points are used when you inspect the same parameters again and again.
2.     When you click on results tab in QA32, system asks you put some identification number. Letu2019s say you put A1 and then press enter. Thereafter you record the actual results (LENGTH, WIDTH etc.) You save this without giving UD.
3.     For the next time when you again click on results for the same inspection lot, system again asks you to put identification number. This time suppose you put A2. Then again you record the results (LENGTH, WIDTH) for A2.
4.     Likewise you can retrieve the inspection results from system with respect to inspection point (identification point).
5.     Typically this can be used for chemical industries where you record the temperature of the same chemical after every ½ an hour. Here 10:00 am, 10:30 am can be used as identifications numbers. As a result of which you can get the information that at 10:00 am temperature was 40 Deg and at 10:30 am it was 75 degree Celsius.
If your requirement resembles this situation, then only the use of inspection points would be fruitful.
B- Without Inspection Points
But if you want to record the readings by various agencies like customer, umpire (refer following pattern)and want to compare them there are other ways.
1.     Reading by your inspector
a.     LENGTH u2013 100, 101, 102mm (average is 101mm)
b.     WIDTH     - 10.50, 10.50, 10.60mm (average is 31.6mm)
2.     Reading by customer
a.     LENGTH u2013 100, 101, 102mm (average is 101mm)
b.     WIDTH     - 10.50, 10.50, 10.60mm (average is 31.6mm)
3.     Reading by umpire
a.     LENGTH u2013 100, 101, 102mm (average is 101mm)
b.     WIDTH     - 10.50, 10.50, 10.60mm (average is 31.6mm)
You can achieve this without using inspection points also. For this in QP02 you need to create 3 operation; Inspector, Customer and umpire respectively. Feed the MICs in each of these operations. When you click on result tab system will throw pop up for these 3 operations. Double click on Umpire if you want to record results noted by umpire. Likewise for rest of the operations. You can do this even after UD also (after 1-2 months also). You need to use MIC with control indicator as long term characteristics for this in QS23.
Regarding averaging of results u2013 This can be achieved using single result recording MIC with or without inspection points. Use appropriate sampling procedure. When you feed results in QA32 system automaticaaly averages out the reading. This can be viewable against phi symbol.
Finally you did mention that u201Chere I am not getting the newly created inspection lotsu201D. Does that mean inspection lot (10 origin) has not created?
Regards,
Anand Rao

Usage decision vs result recording.

Hi All Guru,
I am new in QM , was MM & PP support. I am confused here about the usage decision vs result recording.
I do understand in QM there's inspection lot , in order to release the inspection lot , i should released the UD.
So what's the different between this both ?
Can i have inspection lot without result recording ?
Or can i have inspection lot without UD ?
Please help to clarify my confuse.
Thank you

Hi Crag ,
Thanks for understand because i am totally new in QM.
I won't use QM for Notification here. I will use QM for stock transfer & QM in Delivery before PGI.
As i know the basic requirement of QM
Setup the Master Data (QM View & all QM relavant data) ---> Type of inspection (which will determine which type of inspection to carry out ) -----> Inspection Lot Configuration --->Configuration for UD ----> Configuration for COA.
Master data that which required
Material master QM view,
Master inspection characteristics,
Task lists or inspection plans
Code, Code groups and Selected sets.
Quality info-record
My Question :
By having the above setup and configuration , without result recording can i have the COA to print out for either Post Process Inspection (Final FG) or Inspection at Delivery ?
With the Master Data which i mention as above , is it sufficient for me to activate
Post Process Inspection (Final FG - QM PP)
QM Inspection at Delivery (QM /SD)
QM stock transfer with inspection type 08.
Hope to hear from you.
Thank you

Result Recording for inprocess lot

Hello SAP gurus.
For in process inspection lot i have 3 operation for testing my requirment is if i goning for result recording for second operation without result recording for first operation system should restrict me. we are using 100 inspection point for inprocess inspection please suggest how can we do this?
Regards.

Dear,
Goto OPK4 -Select order type /Plant - Select 'Generally valid setting' for 'Operation sequence-Select 'Error when operation sequnce is not adhered and also QM Error message if no inspection result exists.
Or you can use the exit CONFPP05 PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving .
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Hide specification column in result recording at plant level

Hi,
There is an requirement to hide specification column in result recording screen at plant level.
By table control we can hide the specification column but the setting is at user level or client level.
Is there any standard procedure to hide specification column at plant level.
Regards
Amol

Dear Amol,
Try this if works for you.
1.     Go to QA32
2.     Select an inspection lot
3.     Click on results
4.     Here you will get the specification column along with RR column
5.     Reduce the width of specification column just like we do in Microsoft excel by dragging it from right to left until it disappears
6.     At the right hand side you find a small table like symbol. When you move your mouse pointer towards it, it reflects as Configuration.
7.     Click it
8.     Give suitable name to variant and save
This is user ID specific.
Best Regards,
Anand Rao

Preventing UD without results recording

HI,
We are able to do force closing of the inspection lots without results recording by registering the UD directly. How to prevent this? i.e. we dont want to register UD for lots without result recording for all the characterisitics. With User status we cannot achieve this because if we register results for some characteristics also the system status will be updated.
Regards,
Ravi Kumar C.

hi
yes as Mr.Shyamal mentioned, you can get through User status and in MIC slect the Required Characteristic radio button on control indicators,
If you set this indicator, the inspection characteristic must be inspected.
This means that you can only make a usage decision for the inspection lot after you have confirmed inspection results for this inspection characteristic.
-pl check
-ashok

Populating result recording screen qe11

dear all,
i have got chemical results in the qamr table from one process.Now i have to feed mechanical values in the result recording screen(i.ie. QE11). My requirement is that after going to result recording screen from QA32-->results(qe11) ....my chemistry results should be showing on this screen . Earlier in my inspection plan we have only mechanical characteristics was showing here. User feeds the mech. values by checking chemistry values through another report. Now i want to add chemistry characteristics here also and the user will see what are the chemistry results before entering mech values....

You are attempting to mix results here which you can't do.
You apparently have the chemistry results recorded as single results but you want to use inspection points for recording the mechanical results. No can do.
You could use two inspection types for this. Ideally you'd do the mechanical tests first in an 03 inspection lot. Then do the Chemistry results in an 04 inspection. The 04 lot could also use the results copy functionality to copy over the mechanical result from the 03 lot if you wanted all the resutls in a final inspection lot.
If you have to do the chemistry results first and then the mechanial, you can't use the above process. In this case, I think you'll have to have two different inspection lots.
FF

Employee ID & Password at the time of Results Recording

Hi Gurus,
At the time of results recording there is a need of entering employee id, password & some additional text. Is it possible?
Thanks in Advance,
Sandeep

Hi
Use digital signature for this scenario. SPRO > Envt>Central functions>Auth.Mgt>Dig Sign. In this signature method for results recording. All this linked with Material Authorization Group in MM-QM View. Read more on digital signature. You will get the solution.

Displaying operation long text in results recording screen

Hi, all!
I am trying to understand why I cannot display the operation long text when in results recording screen (either QE51N or QE01 transaction will not support displaying of operation long text).
I have checked all areas that I could think of in config to see if there is a display setting that will require to be activated and I could not find anything under Results recording, Inspection planning or General settings. I also tried to see if user settings may be making a difference and it did not. The SAP Help portal when talking of long texts available in results recording lists the following: Long texts for inspection lot, inspection method and inspection charcateristic. Nothing about operation long text.
However, the text is printed on the inspection instruction standard form.
SAP Notes has nothing on the subject that I could find.
So, as a last resort, I would like to ask if any other Quality Management specialist came across this and spent any time in determining if this can be done and why the information would not be displayed standard in the transactions. My client would prefer not to have to print the instructions in order to see the entire text. However, I do not see any standard way to have it displayed.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance!

Hi Senthil,
Don't know it will help or not. But if your MIC is qualitative then you can use the long text of catalog code in QS42.
Please refer below screen,
Click on the which help to maintain the long text.
Regards,
Sandip

Result recording & display of multiple tests/analysis of single sample

Hello Friends
Here is my scenario;
I receive 500 kgs of material in 5 bags. I want to draw sample of 1 kg from each bag. Thus I will be having 5 samples. I will perform the required tests on each sample. For testing I am consuming @250 gms of material. Out of 5 samples, I had to conduct the retest on 2 samples. I want to do the result recording of these tests/samples. In my understanding there will be 7 result recordings which will include 2 of Retest of 2 samples. I would like to display all the values recorded ( atleast for each samples ). Also, I would like to see the individual values and not the averaged out values the recordings.
How can I take care of constraints due to pooled sample i.e. it allows only the result recording of pooled sample and not the subsequent samples.
I would appreciate your detailed guidance on this issue.
Regards
mahesh

Hello Lenin
Normally, we use Sampling procedure with Fixed Sample as Sampling Type withAttributive inspection non confirming units as valuation mode. Determination Rule as 10 ( Fixed Sample ). Sample drawing Procedure followed is "draw from all containers". Irrespective of our present settings, I would appreciate if you let me know the settings to be made in order to map given scenario.
Regards
mahesh

Decimal places display at the time of results recording

Dear All,
Please i faced one problem, At the time of results recoridngi/.e,
In my insp. plan i defined Quantitative specification as 70.0 with '1' decimal place in Qunatitative data. but after results recording it displaying one more decimal place excessi.e., as 70.00. How can i solve this problem, due to what this problem is occure. Please if any, solve its urgent.
Regards,
Vijaya

Dear Vijaya,
While entering Inspection Characteristics.. There is a field called DecPlaces on the right. its the 24th field on the item table.
The field comes after
Method, Insp Method plant, Version, Sampling Procedure, Sample Unit of Measure, Base Sample Quantity, SPC Criterion, Modification Rule, Test Eqpmt, Test Equip Short Text, Par Sample, DecPlace, Unit of Measure, Target Value, Lower spec Lmt, Upper Spec Lmt... and so on...
Regards
Vijay

Result recording for quantitative inspection characteristic

Team
Greetings!
Please find the following requirement.
We are using quantitative characteristics inspection.
Inspection lots are created automatically and the sample size for each characteristics are determined based on the sampling proceedure.
when we do result recording for a characteristic, say the sample size is 5, even if any one of the sample does not fall under the limit, we need the characteristic to be rejected.
How can this be addressed.
Gobinathan G

.

Requirement of displaying inspection method in result recording

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for