Restrict fields in advanced search

Hi,
afaik you should be able to restrict the fields exposed to the user in the advanced search with R18.
I am not able to find the place to configure this. Any hints?
Thanks in advance
Michael

Michael, tere is a new privilege called "All fields in Search and Lists" that controls if a user sees all available fields or just the ones on the record detail page.

Similar Messages

  • How to restrict columns in Advanced search which are known at runtime

    Hi Team,
    I need your suggestions for one of my adf search usecase. I had Querypanel with table on UI...where in Viewobject has relations with 2 other tables and this Viewobject is based on Entity...now in advanced search for addfields i was getting all column names by default like 3 tables column names....instead of all columns i need to restrict to particular columns. This particular columns will be decided at runtime like how many columns needs to be shown and alias names for those particular columns. So could you please help me how to approach this requirement.
    Thanks in Advance for your help.

    whatever you said is at designtime wherein we can uncheck the Queryable checkbox....but as i said at runtime from the application i can come to know whichever fields needs to be there and alias names for columns for add fields in Advanced search...

  • Bug after adding fields in advanced search mode of af:query

    We are migrating from JDeveloper 11.1.1.6 to 11.1.1.7.
    I noticed the following issue:
    In a page with search criteria (based on a view object), when the user adds an additional field in advanced search mode and clicks on a full submit button in the page, the following browser popup appears:
    "This page is asking you to confirm that you want to leave - data you have entered may not be saved."
    This was logged as a bug in Oracle Support but we have not been able to find a workaround yet.
    This is the only issue currently blocking us from migrating to 11.1.1.7. Has anyone else faced this issue? Any ideas on how we can bypass this behavior?
    Thank you,
    Gabriel.

    Unfortunately, the latest update from Oracle Support was that they no longer consider this a bug!
    SR 3-7706485141: Additional Fields in af:query problem - JDeveloper 11.1.1.7
    Bug 17346704 - ADDING FIELD TO AF:QUERY ADVANCED SEARCH CAUSES SPURIOUS WARNING DIALOG POPUP
    1. I cannot understand how something that blocks user actions and cannot be bypassed in any way could be considered "acceptable behavior".
    2. I also do not understand how a Bug can be lodged and then have its status changed to "Not a Bug".
    3. Even if we were to ignore this issue and convince our customers that they should be delayed by meaningless popups while working (which we cannot), their is still another issue that makes this functionality dysfunctional. When the user clicks on "Stay on Page" the popup closes and the page freezes and becomes unresponsive.
    Off course this is another issue and a different SR should open, but I think it shows that something is going very wrong with this functionality.
    I wonder if anyone else is considering using JDeveloper 11.1.1.7.0 in a production system.

  • Removing standard operators for a field in Advanced search

    Hi,
    JDev 11.1.1.3.
    In ADF application, we need to remove few standard operators from the list for a field in Advanced search. For this we have followed the below oracle documentation:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/web.1111/b31974/web_search_bc.htm#ADFFD2457
    27.3.3 How to Create Custom Operators or Remove Standard Operators
    As specified in the doc, we have added the below "CompOper" tag to VO.xml. We have to remove all the operators present in the list except the "Equal to". But the issue is, using below code the "Not between" and "contains" operators are deleted from list, but "Not equl to" is still getting displayed. We have also tried "Doesnotequal". I have tried the oper string with spaces, without spaces, spaces replaced by underscore.
    Can some one please provide the exact String to be passed in oper attribute of CompOper for all operators?
    <ViewCriteriaItem
    Name="CmLookupTypesVOCriteria_vcrow16_Category"
    ViewAttribute="Category"
    Operator="="
    Conjunction="AND"
    Required="Optional"
    UpperColumns="1">
    <CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTEQUALTO"/>
    <CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTBETWEEN"/>
    <CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="CONTAINS"/>
    </ViewCriteriaItem>
    Thanks,
    Manasa Tadi

    I am not able to find the list for the entire set of operators, but you could follow a simple technique to identify the exact operator to be used:
    In the View Criteria editor, for any of the attribute, modify the operator to any desired value, this would update the *VO.xml,
    use the same operator, if you want to hide it in advanced mode - as you have done earlier.
    <ViewCriteriaItem
    Name="CmLookupTypesVOCriteria_vcrow16_Category"
    ViewAttribute="Category"
    Operator="="
    Conjunction="AND"
    Required="Optional"
    UpperColumns="1">
    <CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTEQUALTO"/>
    <CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="NOTBETWEEN"/>
    <CompOper Name="Category" ToDo="-1" Oper="CONTAINS"/>
    </ViewCriteriaItem>
    Thanks,
    Navaneeth

  • Adding a new Search Field in Advance Search

    Hi,
    In 1 of the advance search regions, :
    We have a search panel in the adv search RN. In the poplist we have say 10 fields. We can add either of these 10 fields and use for searching. Now I want to add another search field ( an attribute from a table).
    Question 1 :*
    How to find the underlying VO from which the search fields are coming. I saw the page ( about this page) but couldn't find anything.
    Question 2:*
    Suppose I get the VO (resolution from above question) , if my extra filed is not there I add it in the VO ( VO extn), now how to configure this new field to the existing search panel fields?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think search fields are not mapped to any VO. If this is your standard page, check the standard controller. It might be getting values from pageContext.getparameter().
    You can create a new item using 'Personalize this Page' option and extend your controller to set where clause for the same.
    --Sushant                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Input field in "Advanced Search"

    Hello Experts,
    I'm setting the "Search Component Set" and "Search Option Set" in our portal, and I've a little question..
    In our default "Search Option Set" I disabled the property "Enable Large Search Field" (and it works fine, the input field is not large!) BUT during the search when I go in "Advanced Search" the input field return large... Why??
    Is possible to set a  not large input field also in "Advanced search" ?
    Thanks in advance

    Ok,
    in SystemAdmin > SystemConfig > ContentManagement > UserInterface > Search
    you can find the "Search Component Set" and "Search Option Set".
    Configuring "Search Option Set" (the default option set used is "UISearch") you can enable/disable the parameter "Enable Large Search Field", that works on input field width..
    If I disable this parameter the input field of my toolArea is short, but if go into "Advanced Search" the input field change and became large...

  • SRM 7 Add a field to Advanced Search

    Hi,
    we have a requirement, where I need to add a feild on the advanced search screen. Are there any BADis to acheive this.
    Any info on this is highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Krishna

    Hi Siva,
    Thank you for the response.
    Can you please elaoborate this. Like how you renamed the standard field, how to find out which structure needs to be appended. A step by step guidance if you have time on this will really help me ... 
    Looking forward to here from you again.
    Believe me , you will be highly appreciated for the info.
    Thanks in advance,
    Krishna

  • Advanced Search-Clearing search criteria

    Hi,
    I am developing apps using JDev 10.1.2. and JHS build 32.
    My problem is with using the Advanced Search on page with table layout.
    The Advanced Search contains one lookup field (a lamp).
    When I enter something in the lamp field and press Find button I get proper result.
    Then I run Clear. All field from Advanced Search region are cleared.
    Then I run Find and I get question similar to "You are about to leave page without commiting changes...". I choose OK and the lamp field get the old value and the result is incorrect.
    What is wrong?
    regards,
    Cezary

    Cezary,
    This is indeed a bug in JHeadstart, thanks for pointing this out. The fix will be present in the next release, but for now you and anyone running into it will have to apply a workaround: in the UIX page, locate the "FindXXX" field that has this problem. It will be easy to find because its name is suffixed with "_No_Update". This is incorrect (for the find field, it is OK for the actual form and/or table field!!). Remove the suffix NoUpdate and all should be well again.
    Hope this helps,
    Peter Ebell
    JHeadstart Team

  • Outlook advanced search & Exchange 2013 - "Sent to...." field doesn't work correctly in online mode?

    Hello,<o:p></o:p>
    We've come across what seems to be a problem with advanced find in Outlook in online mode, when used with Exchange 2013. 
    Using the "Messages" tab of "Advanced Find", anything typed into the "Sent to...." field produces no search results.  If the field is populated by clicking
    "Sent to..." and selecting a name from a contact list or GAL, results are returned. 
    eg. 
    Sent items contains messages to "Charlie" who has the email address
    [email protected] and sender is
    "Dave" who has the email address
    [email protected] 
    Entering "charlie" or
    [email protected], (or any previously acceptable partial term such as "charl" or "@contoso.com") into the "Sent to"" field produces no results.  If the user exists in a contact
    list and is selected from it, the search works fine.  The same is true searching the inbox, using the local user's id of "Dave" or
    [email protected]
    We've confirmed this issue occurs at four client's sites, plus our own internal Exchange 2013 CU3 system.  Four of the sites have been transitioned from Exchange 2010, the fifth was a completely new installation.  The problem occurs with Outlook
    2007, 2010 and 2013. 
    This works fine in cached mode (not a solution as our clients are predominantly Citrix/RDS).  Exchange search doesn't report any issues and the index states are all "healthy",
    we've also tried rebuilding the indexes with no improvement.
    Any ideas would be appreciated, or even if someone else can confirm they see the same thing.
    Thanks.

    Hi Winnie,
    Thanks for your reply, and I'm sorry I've not responded earlier.  While this problem is one that's annoying several of our clients, and while I have been doing further testing and investigation, it's had to take a back seat to other more pressing issues
    until now.
    OWA search works fine, as does using "From:" in instant search, and the "From" query on the Advanced tab in Advanced Find.  The search services have been restarted, indexing state and copy status etc are all healthy, the indexes
    have been rebuilt/reseeded, and I've gone through the diagnostics again.  Nothing is logged in event viewer, and the only error that comes up when checking failed index docs for a user are for unsupported format handlers (.png etc).
    The issue seems purely to be with the "Sent to..." field on the Messages tab, it's as if it gets completely ignored.  The search returns instantly with "There are no items to show in this view".  Just to make sure I wasn't losing
    my marbles, I've compared searches on Exchange 2007 and 2010, and on those I can enter as little as a single letter or email domain and receive the expected results.  On 2013 I get nothing whatsoever whatever I enter, unless I pick an address from a contact
    list.
    At this point, I thought that since Office 365 is Exchange 2013 based it'd be worth testing that, and sure enough I got exactly the same issue.  I setup an Office 365/Outlook 2010 profile on a machine that is currently in an existing Exchange 2010
    environment where search works correctly, searching Office 365 doesn't work on that either.
    EDIT - Ignore this bit, a fresh install of Windows 7 and Office 2010 doesn't work with Office 365 either.  I am exploring another avenue.  I setup a fresh Windows 7 VM, installed Office 2010 and connected that to Office 365, search worked fine,
    so I'm now looking into what the difference with that VM and the servers and workstations out "in the wild" could be.  For example, the test VM isn't on a domain, it's not fully patched, it has no additional software installed etc.  Outside
    of Microsoft applications and operating systems and having similar configurations, I haven't isolated a common link across all of our client sites that are affected, there's no single 3rd party application or anti-virus solution in place at all of them for
    example. 
    I'll update with any findings, but if you or anyone else has any idea in the meantime I'd be grateful for your input.
    Regards.

  • Help required to customize Simple/Advanced Search. Need to add new fields

    Hello,
    Module: Oracle Sales Online
    EBS version: 12.1.3
    Jdev version: 10.1.3.3
    Scenario:
    - We are dealing with standard oracle pages.
    - We have TWO "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH"s available. Each "Simple/Advanced Search" can be found by navigating through paths "A --> B" and "A --> B --> C --> D" . Here it means one "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH" page is available at page "B" and another "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH" is available at page "D".
    - In the first search page which is at page "B", both Simple as well as Advanced search has a filter field "Win Probability %", of type VARCHAR2/DROPDOWN with values (10, >=10, <=30, 30, >=30, <=50, 50, >=50, <=70, 70, >=70, <=90, 90, 100)
    - In second search page, referring to page "D", the Simple search DOESN'T have the "Win Probability %". And the Advanced Search page has the "Win Probability %" but it is of type - NUMBER/MessageTextInput type.
    Issue/Requirement:
    - The 2nd Simple/Advanced search pages need to have "WIN PROBABILITY %" field and it should be of VARCHAR2/DROPDOWN with values (10, >=10, <=30, 30, >=30, <=50, 50, >=50, <=70, 70, >=70, <=90, 90, 100) just like the way we had in 1st Simple/Advanced search.
    Note:
    - Again speaking we are dealing with standard oracle pages
    - If you go to the "About this Page", interestingly I found:
    i. The "message component layout" for both of them is from the same region , i.e., ASNOpptympSrchRN
    ii. Rest of the search filters for both the searchs are from common View Object , i.e., OpptySearchVO1 (for Simple search), OpportunityDetailsVO1 (for advanced search)
    iii. The "Stack layout" for both the search pages are same, i.e. XXMASOpptyQryCO
    iv. None of the fields are rendered to false (everything is set to be rendered TRUE)
    Any response is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Anand
    Edited by: 933590 on Jul 19, 2012 8:18 AM

    "XXMASOpptyQryCO is the name of stacklayout or CO?
    What is the CO?
    Does both pages share same CO?
    have you already extended the CO "XXMASOpptyQryCO"?
    what is the original CO then? I think in that CO it must be written somewhere, simple search "search allowed = false""
    -Here CO what you are referring is a controller.
    -FYI pages share same controller.
    -And the original controller for both the pages are OpptyUwqCO. Right now its extended controller is XXMASOpptyQryCO
    Fact is I didn't create this search page. It was built by some third party members. Also that I do not have the original source nor the documentation pertaining to it. So could you inform as in how should I navigate to the point "Search Allowed = True"
    I should have informed that at "B" page, it has a region      /oracle/apps/asn/opportunity/webui/ASNMgrOpptyQryRN and at page "D", the region is      /oracle/apps/asn/opportunity/webui/ASNOpptyQryRN
    Edited by: 933590 on Jul 19, 2012 1:37 PM

  • Office 365 - sharepoint: In Advanced search Page, How to add custom column under property restrictions

     In Advanced search Page, How to add custom column under property restrictions?

    Hi,
    The Navigation control can be added into your HTML page in the Snippet Gallery:
    The two links below about how to create HTML master page and adding snippets needed into it for your reference:
    http://borderingdotnet.blogspot.jp/2012/12/how-to-create-html-masterpage-for.html
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj822370(v=office.15).aspx
    Feel free to reply if there still any question.
    Best regards,
    Patrick
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Add custom property restrictions in advanced search web part

    hi,
     I am having the default advanced search box web part in my ent.search center site collec. but as per my requirement i need to a  few items in the property restrictions dropdown in my advanced search web part.
    is this possible in sp 2013 e.t serach center  site collection?
    any help is  highly appreciated!

    Hi,
    Check this
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff621097.aspx
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c25d418d-d4a2-47a3-9abe-c27656764843/how-to-add-custom-property-in-advanced-search-page?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious

  • Controlling criteria in Advanced Search 'Add Fields'

    Hi all,
    Jdev Version: Studio Edition Version 11.1.1.7.0
    Background
    I have two VOs described as below -
    TaskVO - Fetches a list of tasks
    TaskUserVO - Fetches the list of users of tasks - Users may be assignees or owners identified by value in column 'USER_SOURCE_TYPE'.
    A view link relates TaskVO & TaskUserVO by the TASK_ID (primary key of TaskVO).
    I have a view criteria for displaying a search by assignee and search by owner as criteria in my search query region. For this, I have used 2 inline view criteria in my view criteria defined in TaskVO. Both inline view criteria are on TaskUserVO (one for Owner & other for Assignee) and each takes 2 bind variables -
    i. USER_SOURCE_TYPE - This can either be ASSIGNEE or OWNER
    ii. NAME - This is the name of the assignee or owner.
    Issue Description
    The issue I face is in Advanced Search - Add fields. Since the same inline view criteria (TaskUserVO) is added twice (once for Owner & other for Assignee), the Add fields shows 'Name' twice in the list.
    I need to show the Add field label name as 'Assignee' corresponding to the Assignee inline VC and name as 'Owner' for Owner inline VC. How can I achieve this?
    In general, I am also looking for ways to pro-grammatically modify the 'Add field' list (I understand that the Queriable flag controls this list declaratively). Any suggestions on this?
    Could QueryModel/QueryDescriptor help in achieving this?
    Thanks,
    Srini

    Any thoughts on this one?

  • Field recovery in the  account's advanced search

    Hi all,
    i am working with badi CRM_ACC_SEARCH and i need to recover the value entered in  field 'last name' , talking about the advanced search of accounts (field group ACC_SEARCH_07, structure CRMT_BSP_SEAREQ_ACCOUNT, model access CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD). How can i do it?    any module function? thanks in advance.
    Best Regards
    Gab

    Hi GAB.
    Which Application are you using ?
    Regards.
    Armando Rodriguez.

  • PC UI Advanced Search - Enhancement by standard fields of transaction table

    Hello,
    we are using CRM 5.0 SP13.
    We are familiar to enhance PC UI applications (BP+transactions) by EEW customer fields and how to use/hide them in the search functionalities etc.
    But now we need to enhance the advanced search for leads by the POSTING_DATE date of table CRMD_ORDERADM_H. Unfortunytely in PC UI advanced search structure for leads CRMT_BSP_LEA_SEARCH_ME the POSTING_DATE is not included like it is in the opportunity advanced search structure CRMT_BSP_OPP_SEARCH, where we were able to enhance the search easily by CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C customizing.
    The idea is to solve the problem to create EEW fields POSTING_DATE_FROM and POSTING_DATE_TO like they are existing in CRMT_BSP_OPP_SEARCH and use them in advanced search. So far no problem in creating and displaying the EEW fileds by CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C.
    But the part we are missing is to link the new EEW fields to the standard database-field POSTING_DATE and implement the search functionality "Searching by select option POSTING_DATE_FROM and POSTING_DATE_TO".
    Anybody any experience to link EEW-fields to standard fields of database tables for advanced search functionality in PC UI.
    Thank you for your help in advance.
    Best regards
    Marco

    Hi Marco,
    The best option here is to create redefination of the query method of the leads search class. Here you can first ensure that the call to the query method of super class takes place and the next would be do mapping between custom fields to local structure and then call the relevant API's to fetch the data.
    Best Regards, Adil

Maybe you are looking for