Restrict PO creation for multiple plants for same company code

Hi Gurus,
We want to restrict PO creation for multiple plants in the same company code. Based on Standard SAP settings for Purchasing organization assignment with multiple Plant and multiple Plant assignment with single company code, this is happening. Is there a way that we can restrict by doing some customization change.
Any thoughts or ideas will be highly appreciating.
Thanks and Best regards,
Karun Kumar

Hi,
Said functionality is not available in SAP standard.
To avoid the same ,i can suggest implement release strategy for PO,and then higher authority / commercial team can check created PO,if multiple plants available in single po then they have the option of rejection for the same.
Or else check BADI-ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST,take the help from abapor and apply the restriction to select multiple plant in PO.
Hope this will resolve your query,
Thanks & Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Similar Messages

  • How to create group bom for multiple plants with different company codes

    Dear all,
    In my current scenario we have 5 Company codes with a plant with each company. The same kind of materials exist in all the 5 plants, so what i want is when i create any BOM, that BOM has to extend in all the company codes, as with GROUP BOM i can able to extend the same in only one company code.
    So how to do this?
    Thanks in Advance
    Bhushan

    For that first extend all the materials to all the plants... In one plant create a BOM for the material..
    In all other polants in CS01,   click COpy from .. There you mention the matreial and the plant in which the BOm is alerady available..
    karthick

  • Can Equipment No same for 2 Equip in different Plants of same company code?

    Hi Gurus,
                Please tell me if there is any possibility of having same Equipment No for 2 Equipments in Different Plants.
                The 2 plants are in the Same Company code.
                e.g.  Equip           Plant                Company Code
                   1)  Equip_DIE    Plant1              A
                   2)  Equip_DIE    Plant2              A
               If it is possible how the Equipment histroy and Breakdown history is updated in the PMIS.         
               Also tell me the advantages and Disadvantages of keeping same Equipment no for 2 diiferernt Equipments or otherwise keeping different equipment no.
    With best regards,
    Narendra Dere

    Hi Pete ,
              Thanks for your valuable reply.
              Actually I am doing implementation for 5 plants within same Company Code.
              They are geographically distant (say 50km from each Other.)
              The Finish Product is same but the method is different.
              They have already assigned some Equipment Numbers in the Plant for Regular Maintenance Activities.
              Since Planning and Maintenance can be done at the different Plant and team of the MAintenance is different, they dont hv anyproblem if equipment number is same. Otherway they wll have the added advantage that they can continue with there own Equipment no which can be same in differnt Plant.
           e.g 800TONPRESS - Plant1
                800TONPRESS - Plant 2.
       With best regards,
       Narendra Dere

  • Material Ledger activation (COML) - multiple plants in single company code.

    Hi -
    Material Ledger activation (COML)- multiple plants in single company code.
    In large mfg plant - process industry (proposed to dived into number of production plants), Matrial 'a'  is produced in plant 'a'.Material 'a' is input to procude matl 'B' in plant 'B"..so on and so forth.
    We are activating Material Ledger (COML) for actual costing purpose. Question -During multi level price determination, will the variance of lower level materials ( produced in lowerlevel /other plants in our case) be rolled up to higher level materials (in a different plant). please let me know if it really works, if yes what are the guidelines (if any) .
    Please advise ASAP.
    Thanks
    Chris
    Edited by: Chris Farr on Oct 23, 2008 11:12 AM

    Hi Chris,
    from a business point of view there is a  difference that you might take into consideration: The valauation level will always be on material and plant combination. That means, the division into several virtual plants will usually lead to different actual prices for the same material in each plant. That might happen for example when you carry over stocks from last month into the current month in one plant, while the other plant has only receipts from the current month.
    That might me desired, but often it is not. If the mutiple plants are in reality only one location it might be hard to explain why the prices differ between plants.
    best regards,  Udo

  • Stock transfer order between 2 plants in same company code

    Dear All,
    We have the requirement, where in the stock tranfer order (between 2 plants in same company code) instead of Material valuation price, MAP/Standard (depends on Price Control) gets picked up from supplying plant ,user should be able to enter its own price while creating stock transfer order.
    For fullfilling this requirement, I have created new condition type(where i have changed condition category from internal price "G" to "H" - Basic Price)
    Instead of using condition type- P101 in the stock transfer pricing,I have used above created new condition type, in pricing procedure then also while doing the post good issue against the outbound delivery( move type-"641", moving average is getting picked up.
    Can you please tell,where is the setting where we can make the system to consider manual given price while creating the stock transfer order instead of picking moving average price.
    Its very Important requirement ,please Provide valuable Inputs else provide some alternative.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nitin Chhabra

    Stock Transfer Order between Plants in the same Company Cpde are not relevant for pricing, as there is no billing. Billing only takes place between company codes. As same company code it would be like selling something to yourself - it doesn't make sense.  The stock value in the receiving Plant depends on the price contol there. If standard price, then you must enter the price when creating the material or use material revaluation to change it. When you transfer the material from the issuing plant, the value there will be transferred. In case of standard price any difference is posted to stock transfer differences. If using MAP then the value will be transferred from the issuing Plant in full.
    If you use costing with standard price in main plant, then it is possible that you can transfer the cost from the main plant to the second plant, by using special procurement key for costing.
    Rgds
    Richard

  • STO from Plant to Plant in same Company Code

    Dear All ,
    Please give me brief idea about STO(with screen ) from Plant to Plant in same Company Code
    ganga

    Dear Ganga Mukerjee
    Welcome to SDN
    There are plenty of threads available on this topic in both SD general,Sales and MM forums
    Please make a search
    As this is your first qn i am giving here with some simple steps for STO from Plant to Plant in same Company Code via SD route
    INTRA COMPANY STO.
    1. There should be two plants in the given company code for intra STO to
    happen.
    2. Assign Purchasing org of the ordering to the supplying plant.
    3. Create a customer in the supplying sales area.
    4. Assign the customer to the ordering sales area.
    5. IMG > MM > Purchasing > PO > Setup STO > Define shipping data for plants
    here go to supplying plant and mention its own sales area.
    6. In the ordering plant assign the customer created in the supplying sales area
    and also the supplying sales area.
    7. Maintain checking rule as 01.
    8. Assign the delivery type NL supplying plant checking rule and PO Doc type
    UB.
    9. Assign document type UB supplying plant and ordering plant then decide up
    on either 1 step or 2 steps.
    10. Create PO with doc type UB.
    11. Go to VL10B give the PO No. and enter, select the line item and click back
    ground. (Where Del. Will be created in the back ground)
    12. Go to VL02N for picking and PGI.
    13. If 1 step no need of doing MIGO else for 2 steps do MIGO.
    Hence forth make search
    Regards
    Raja

  • Stock Transfer Between two plants within same company code

    Hello,
    We are using scenario-'Stock transfer between two plants within same company code. Scenaro is like Plant A is receving plant and Plant B is delivering Plant.
    Plant A release PO for 100 nos to Plant B
    Plant B issues 100 nos (via delivery) to Plant A
    But Plant A receives only 50 nos physically so they do Goods receipt for 50 nos , but document got generated for 100 nos (when plant B issues material).
    Now Plant A do not want to receive remaining 50 nos physically, but wants to reduce material document which got created when goods issue posted by plant B
    Now stock in transis (mb5t) is 50 nos.
    How to reduce this material document. or any another alternative solution for this?
    Thanks,
    Shailesh

    Hi There
    Reversal of partial is not possible ,
    But you can use the Mov Type 557 and 558 to do the adjustments in Stock in transit qty
    Few more details on STO adjustments
    Hi There
    it can be settle in many ways,,,
    1. Receive the goods as 100 and Scrap the 50 nos from the received plant,,- If the receiving plant is responsible
    2.Revert the PGI/Transfer movement(Vl09) and send the 50 nos again from the supplying plant- of the Supplying plant is responsible,
    3.Also we have the movement type 557 and 558 without doing the above two steps you can correct the qty from stock in transit itself,,
    4. also you can check the below similar thread
    STO - material lost during tranfer from plant A to plant B
    5. If above are not ok, then receive the goods as 100, And raise the STO as your plant as supplying plant and receiving plant is (Supplied 50 nos less) plant,, Do the process without sending the material.. in this way that 50 nos can be adjusted,,
    6.Here is some more details
    557 Issue from stock in transit (adjustment posting)
    Only use this movement type (also the reversal movement type) under the following circumstances:
    Using movement type 557, you can correct purchase-order-independent stock in transit if
    - a good receipt cannot be posted to a purchase order without stock in transit, even though there is still stock in transit according to the purchase order history
    - stock in transit still exists, even though there are no open stock transfer orders for the particular material
    This movement type may ONLY be used in the cases mentioned above after careful analysis, to correct stock in transit that has rounding errors.
    This movement type may not be copied.
    Note!
    Before using this movement type, note the following:
    - 392205 Analysis stock in transit / Correction if split valuation
    Possible special stock indicators:
    E, Q
    7. As previous post says if you have the note for this issue you can use that also
    You can use any one of the way to solve the issue, Hope it helps
    Cheers
    Senthil P

  • STO not working for plants of same company code assigned to a Purchase Org

    We have two company code ( A & B ) assigned to a single Purchase Org .
    when we are trying to do STO of company code A , we are getting an error message like that
    The plant you have entered does not belong to the company code that was
    determined via the purchasing organization.
    Any suggestion please. we assigned all the plants to the Purchase Org .
    Thanks
    JJ

    Hi,
    While creating STO you are entering the plant.
    Please check whether that Plant is assigned to the Company code A Error message clearly tells you have assigned the Plant to the company code A
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Single Purchase Order for different Plants of Different Company Codes

    Hi Experts,
    I have a scenario, My Client has 3 Company Codes (1000, 2000, 3000 )
    Company Code 1000 has 2-Plants    ( A001 and A002 )
    Company Code 2000 has 1-Plant      ( B001 )
    Comapny Code 3000 has  3-Plants   ( C001, C002, C003 )
    All these 3-Company codes has centralised purchase organisation.
    My Client requirement is to raise a single purchase order for external vendor, for all the plants A001, A002 which is in one company code and similarly in same Purchase Order for B001 plant which belongs to 2000 Company Code and Similarly for same purchase order for C001, C002, C003 plant which belongs to 3000 Company Code.
    1)Is it possible to raise a Single Purchase to External Vendor for plants of Different Company Codes ?
    2)Does it affect the accounting document ?
    3)How to inward and where to inward these goods ? with respect to plant wise ?
    Please Guide with Valuable inputs.
    Thanks in Advance
    Best Regards
    Javeed
    Best regards
    Javeed Ahamed

    1) How about Profit Centre ? We have Framed each Profit Centre with respect to Plant
    Why should there be a problem?
    2)In Case of Migo does we have to be careful and do stepwise MIGO with respect to different Plants ?
    of course people have to be careful when performing transactions.
    if you have multiple items in a PO then you can easily receive all items in one go. So people have to careful and need to check if they really received each of the PO items. Especially if people have authorization for many plants, then the user who is usually performing the receipts for plant A can easily post the receipts of plant B too.
    3) How to Process MIRO ? Can we process Partial MIRO"S with respect to Line-items of those particular Plants ?
    MIRO allows to post the invoice like it is send to you from your vendor. If it is just for a part of your PO then this is just a fact and MIRO allows to post this kind of invoices too.

  • Can we give same Excise Group to two diff.  Plant within same company code

    Hi,
    Can anyone please tell that whether we can assign same Excise Group to two different plants within the same company code in SAP.
    Regards,

    Yes you can use but, you shouldn't use same excise group for two different plants in one company code, if their physical location is different.
    As many excise report are fetched on the basis of excise group, there it will show combined values for both plants, whcih may not be acceptable to exices authorities.
    Regards,
    Sachendra Singh

  • Settings for the new plant under same company code

    Dear all,
    As I am into the roll out project. I need to know the necessary configuration settings from FICO (FI and Contolling Settings) point of view.
    I need this very urgently. If u have any documentation with regard to the same, u can forward to my mail id  [email protected]
    Input will be of great help and rewarded too.
    Thanks
    Niha

    Hi Neha,
    please follow the follwing steps relating to new plant in all madual.
    Steps needs to be configured
    1.New Plant to be created (Copy the new plant from the existing Plant)– Configuration
    2.Create Plant as Location - Configuration
    3.Define Shipping Point- Configuration
    4.Transport Planning Point Description to be changed – Configuration.
    5.Create a new Profit Center – Master Data
    6.Create a new Cost Center – Master Data
    7.Cost Center allocation to Shipment Cost – OKB9 – Configuration
    8.Assign Business Area to New Plant – Configuration
    9.Assign New Plant to Sales Organization & Division - Configuration
    10.Update all the GLs related to the new Plant. Default assignment to a Profit Center - 3KEI – Configuration
    11.Update Table J_1IT030K_V for Indian Tax Account Determination. - Configuration
    12.Account Assignment Category – VKOA – Assign GL Accounts to Sales Org/AcctAssgGr/AcctAsgnmt/Plant/Acct Key – Configuration
    13.Maintain Excise Registration for New Plant- Configuration
    14.Maintain Plant settings for New Plant- Configuration
    15.Maintain Excise Group for New Plant- Configuration
    16.Define GL Accounts for taxes – Configuration
    17.Specify GL account for Excise Transaction- Configuration
    18.Create all Inbound and Outbound Routes for new Plant –Configuration
    19. Assign new plant to company code.
    Please note that the above steps are for new plant by copying the existing plant and modification. If you define a new plant without copying the existing plant lot of steps are involved.
    as per FI/CO part point nos 5 to 8, 10 to 17.
    Hope this will help u, please assign the points if its helpful.
    please cheek your mail i have sent the material.
    regards
    sai krishna

  • EBS - Checks Auto Clearing for two house banks same company code

    Hello,
    I have two house banks in one company code. Both have the same account numbers but different bank keys. When I load the EBS file, checks of only one house bank are getting cleared. Is there any way I could accomodate both the house banks. I use alogorithm 011, and the EBS is in BAI2 file format.
    Will String search be of any help here.?
    Kiran

    Do you get single statement for both house bank accounts?
    Check the 'Assign Bank Accounts to Transaction Types' in EBS customizing. In this step, you'll assign 'Transaction type' to Bank Key and Bank Account.  See if you have assigned only for Bank account.  If the Bank key field is left blank, this issue is a possibility.  So try defining two lines with the Bank Key-Bank Account combination and assign the same transaction type for both.
    The above solution should work.
    If it does not, you can copy the Transaction type into a new one and then assign the new one to the second Bank Key-Bank Account combination.   Dont forget to 'Assign External Transaction Types to Posting Rules' while copying.
    Either of the options should work for you.
    Ravi.

  • MIRO for multiple PO from differenct company codes

    Hi,
    One of the user would like to do MIRO (Invoicing) of multipe PO's together which belong to different company code.
    When I try to do it, it gives a error sayign cross company code transaction and also the functional company code curreny is different from invoicing company code(thouugh PO's are raised in USD)
    For the error, SAP says I can make it a warning.
    However, from business perspective can anyone tell me why this should not be done. I dont want to make the error msg warning and let the user proceed.
    Can anyone please let me know?
    Thanks,
    JR

    It is not a part of Standard SAP, nor a recommended Practice, nor it is logical.
    We understand that when we are speaking of consolidating invoice of different company code, is it an acceptable business practice. In my opinion it is not acceptable business practise. Reason being that Company Code are different Legal entity and how is it correct to even think of merging transactions of different Company code in single invoice. It will invite financial confilct, audit problems and host of unexpected and unanticipated issues.
    It is not recommended to go for any such development also to meet the requirement. Please check with the audit team in all locations whether it would be accepted. Technically also verify with FI team the impact. In my opinion it is a strong NO NO.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka

  • Stock transport scheduling agreement between plants under same company code

    We created outbound delivery and post goods issue in the supplying plant.When I do GR for outbound delivery  for receiving plant" The message displayed is PL stock in transit is excceded by the quantity to be posted ". So I could not post GR using MIGO.
    The Master data created are
    1) Created customer master for receiving plant with account control vendor number for supplying plant ( Account control customer no for receiving plant)
    2) Created vendor master for supplying plant with additional purchasing data for supplying plant
    3) maintained sales views of the material for both the plants.
    4) in IMG shipping data shipping data for plants: receiving plant - customer no for the receiving plant ; sales org for supplying plant and distribution channel and division.
    After posted goods issue in outbound delivery I check plant stock for supplying plant I could see the stock in transfer of the amount issued.
    Can anyone could explain How I could resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nathan

    We created outbound delivery and post goods issue in the supplying plant.When I do GR for outbound delivery  for receiving plant" The message displayed is PL stock in transit is excceded by the quantity to be posted ". So I could not post GR using MIGO.
    The Master data created are
    1) Created customer master for receiving plant with account control vendor number for supplying plant ( Account control customer no for receiving plant)
    2) Created vendor master for supplying plant with additional purchasing data for supplying plant
    3) maintained sales views of the material for both the plants.
    4) in IMG shipping data shipping data for plants: receiving plant - customer no for the receiving plant ; sales org for supplying plant and distribution channel and division.
    After posted goods issue in outbound delivery I check plant stock for supplying plant I could see the stock in transfer of the amount issued.
    Can anyone could explain How I could resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nathan

  • STO from one plant to another plant of same company code

    Hi Friends,
    I have one specific scenario to map in SAP.
    I am transfering gaseous material from PLANT 1 to PLANT 2 thru' STO delivery. PGI has done for Qty 18 MT from PLANT 1. GR against STO at PLANT 2, here GR qty 17.5 (actual) remaining 0.50 MT is not getting discharged as it is in vapour form. This short receipt quantity will go back to PLANT 1 and there it will be treated as truck recovery. When the next delivery will take place they will create the billing document for 18 MT again but in actual the truck will be loaded with 17.5 MT.
    How to adjust In Transit stock of 0.50 MT? What will be the excise treatment for the same?
    Looking forward to your valuable and early response please.
    Regards,
    Ravi

    Hi,
    The goods which are loss in transit , you can follow it by scraping or do a physical count .
    Receive Qty 18 MT  with 101, then scrap 0.50 MT with 551. 
    OR
    Receive Qty 18 MT   with 101, then do a physical count and post the difference.
    OR
    Donu2019t receive Qty 18 MT   ; let the issuing plant cancel the goods issue. And redo with the correct quantity Qty 17.5 MT   . Then receive this correct quantity.
    Regards,
    Biju K
    Edited by: Bijay Kumar Barik on Aug 3, 2009 9:31 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • NooB needs help sorting  php,sql, etc.please

    Hi all, This is my first post but I'd like to thank everyone for all the lurking help I've gotten. You guys are great. I've hit a wall. I use dw8, windows xp and have a server through crystal tech. I would like to build a shopping cart for e-commerce

  • Random shutdowns X99S SLI Plus, ms-7885

    Hello, I'm trying to narrow down some random shutdowns. These seemed to be completely random and could happen with the computer idling. The computer just shutdowns and reboots. Nothing in the log, no BSOD. I have tried to trigger the problem by runni

  • Streaming from a network location in KDE?

    Whenever I try to play something (video or audio) located on a local server, my Arch Linux (using KDE) is trying to download it first and then plays it. How can I make it stream instead of downloading? When I was using Ubuntu (using Gnome) whenever I

  • HOW TO LENGTHEN THE SHORT TEXT FIELD IN  PR-urgent

    dear friends, my client is asking to lengthen the field size of SHORT TEXT in purchase requisition. if they enter the long text, the characters are getting tranucated. can you please provide me good solution for this problem. who is handling this iss

  • When we talk about healthy

    When we talk about healthy fats those is a faster all structure and this engine or are they are just benign meeting their sources calories and don't cause hormonal chaos and atoll change our body's ability to responsive more calories in more calories