Result analysis (KKA2)

What are the business prerequisites for the use of revenue-based, cost-based and quantity-based percentage of completion in the result analysis (KKA2)

In order to comply with accounting standards, the value of work completed on projects in progress need to be capitalized. RA is used for this purpose.
For cost based RA, first calculate the percentage of completion (POC) = actual cost / plan cost * 100
POC * actual revenue gives the revenue attributable to the work competed so far (this is called calculated revenue). Compare calculated revenue and actual revenue booked in GL. This difference in value is capitalized / accrued by SAP when RA is properly configured.
This is suitable for consturction projects.
Revenue based:
Here the starting point is revenue.
POC = actua revenue / plan revenue
calculated cost = POC * plan cost.
The difference between calculated cost and actual cost is capitalized / loss is recognized.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sridhar

Similar Messages

Transaction Currency in Result Analysis - KKA2

Hi,
We have a Z program to calculate WIP for projects at the end of the month. This program in turn calls transaction KKA2 - Result Analysis. We have EUR as controlling area currency and INR as object currency (CC currency). Our projects have INR as project currency but the transactions are booked in USD EUR SGD and INR. We want to calculate WIP in transaction currency.
We checked and found that COSB table is updated with values in controlling area currency EUR and object currency INR. but transaction value(COSB-WTGXX) is not updated when we do KKA2. COSB is always updated with object currency(INR) and CO area currency(EUR) while value in transaction currencies are blank.
We tried to set transaction currency as default for project with transaction RPXN- CO-OM Information System: Settings but that did not help. We checked and found that in controlling area configuration indicator 'All currencies' is selected.
Will you please let me know if there is a way to update COSB with transaction currency values with configuration changes in Result Analysis version used for KKA2 or any other means?
Thanks for your help.
With Regards

Hi,
the requirement is bit surprising to me.
transaction currency is normally related to FI related transactions. Because either the you might bill to the customers in a currently other than co.code currency if it is required by the contract with customer or you might get bills from the vendor in a currency other than your co.code currency
This should not have any bearing on the controlling stuff.
When you post the values to CO, the values will be converted in to object currency and controlling area currency.
Result Analysis calcution will necessarily be in co.code and controlling area currency. There is no transaction currency involved here.
Hope this clarifies your question
Best Regards
surya

Project Results Analysis KKA2 Enhancement

In SPRO - Project System - Revenue & Earnings- Automatic & Periodic
Allocation - Result Analysis - Edit result analysis key & version -
Maintain Result analysis version,
If, CO Area 1000 & RA Version 0 selected, system is not allowing cross-
company valuation check box activation due to "Transfer to Financial
accounting active" check box is selected.
However if "Transfer to Financial accounting active" check box is un-
selected, system is allowing to save with option "cross-company
valuation" check box. But during KKA2, system is showing error due
to "version relevant to settlement" is selected.
Now the problem is that, if "cross-company valuation check box" is not
selected the system is not skiping steps as mentioned in screen.
Hence, enhancement KKAG0001 cannot be activated.
Kindly provide the solution.

Do you have an OSS ID? There is a document to describe the setting of RA for IAS in service.sap.com/erp, access the sub-node of management accounting -> product cost accounting -> media library.
Or access the URL
[https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700006305122006E.PDF]
If you don not have any OSS ID, please reply my message.
Flex Yang

Results Analysis KKA2

Hi All,
Assuming all the RA settings done , what do we achieve by running t code KKA2?
Does it generate any FI , COPA documents or it just shows you costs and revenues associated with the WBS element.
Regards,
Reddy

Hi,
Any expenses booked against a cost object (Project, WBS, Work Order, etc) are posted to expense accounts and shown in P&L statement. After the project / work order is complete, the expenses need to be capitalised to a Balance Sheet accout (inventory, asset, etc.). The process is called settlement. However, if a project / work order is still in work-in-progress at the end of a fiscal period, the accumulated expenses need to be temporarily capitalized to a balance sheet account to obtain an accurate financial statement (BS and P&L) for that fiscal period. This temporary capitalization process is called result analysis.
Thanks,
Rau

Reg the effect of result analysis kka2

Hi All,
I am doing some enhancement for transaction KKA2 where I am changing the cost elment value in my coding where can I see the new cost element that I have changed in the enhancement?I mean after doing result analysis where can I see the cost elment that it has posted(in this case the new cost element that I have changed)?
Regards
mahesh

In order to comply with accounting standards, the value of work completed on projects in progress need to be capitalized. RA is used for this purpose.
For cost based RA, first calculate the percentage of completion (POC) = actual cost / plan cost * 100
POC * actual revenue gives the revenue attributable to the work competed so far (this is called calculated revenue). Compare calculated revenue and actual revenue booked in GL. This difference in value is capitalized / accrued by SAP when RA is properly configured.
This is suitable for consturction projects.
Revenue based:
Here the starting point is revenue.
POC = actua revenue / plan revenue
calculated cost = POC * plan cost.
The difference between calculated cost and actual cost is capitalized / loss is recognized.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sridhar

Stastical Costs on WBS in result analysis

Dear Gurus,
At my client scenario, I am using valuated project stock. Normally in case of valuated project stock, actual cost does not get updated on WBS element at the time of good receipt from PO account assigned to WBS Element.
But I referred SAP note 533207 to achieve actual cost on WBS Element.
As per note, I have created cost element with category 90 for Balance sheet GL account (called at the time of good receipt).
Due to this, at the time of goods receipt, statistical cost gets posted on WBS Element and seen as actual cost on WBS Element reports (This is solving our reporting requirement).
But when I run result analysis (KKA2) on partiular WBS Element, system does not consider this actual cost (stastical cost posted on WBS Element).
It seems system is not considering statistical costs on WBS Element in result analysis (KKA2).
Is there any way to achieve this (consideration of stastical costs on WBS Element in result analysis)
Thanks and Regards,
Parimal

Hi All,
Thanks for your replies....I also appreciate that stastical cost can not be considered as actual cost in result analysis.
But in case of valuated project stock, if stock is available for WBS Element and not issued to production order or any other receiver, under which category the value of WBS stock is to be shown in result analysis.
Is there any other period end function to be carry out specifically for stock valuation or
how to represent it in results of project period end procedures

Problem while running KKA2 (result analysis) RA method 07(POC)

Hi All,
In our project we are using RA method( cost based method -07) when i have the planning cost (material and labour hrs) in the project. Here , issue what i am facing is till there is only showing planned material cost of the project , in KKA2 i can see the planned cost, but I am not able to see planned hours in my result analaysis kka2 if i refer any PS reports i can see the plan cost there. but i can see plan revenue as well .
I am confused with this kind of system behaviour. Kindly suggest me what shall i do to overcome this. In our scenario in valuation method i am ausing over all plan : E and over run : A
Thanks

Hello
Please note the description from the Overview for this SCN Space:
Official SAP Help Portal Community. Find comments on SAP product documentation (such as SAP Application Help, also known as SAP Library), and read best practices shared by the community.
Based do the above, I believe you posted your query into the incorrect SCN Space. Please use the Forum Finder for the New SCN document to find your product and post into that SCN Space.
Also seeing as you did not provide any product information, I would also highly recommend reading the SCN Rules of Engagement.
With best regards,
- Ludek

Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

Hi all
I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
1. Create Result Analysis Keys
2. Define Result Analysis Versions
3. Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
4. Define LIne ID
5. Define Assignment for Result Analysis
6. Define update for Result Analsysis
7. Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
We have RA connection with Projects
After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values.
We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
we need to fix that at high priority...
your inputs are highly appreciated..
Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
best regards,
S. Habib Pasha.

Hi ,
Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
And what are the parameters you maintained in Settelement Profile ?
Thanks,
Sai.

Results Analysis Message KJ436

While setting up Results Analysis for the POC method (03) and executing transaction KKA2, we got the following message. Both the CO version and the RA version are set to the same valuation (Group valuation). Any help would be appriciated.
Basic RA version must have valuation category "0" (operational valuation)
Message no. KJ436
Diagnosis
If a version has actual data (see basic version setting), it must be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of version of results analysis).
If a version does not have actual data (see basic version setting), it cannot be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of the version of results analysis).
Procedure
1. Check the basic version setting in the maintenance of the general versions.
2. Modify the results analysis version to conform to the basic version setting.
3. Turn the indicator Version relevant to settlement on or off, whichever is appropriate.We are using CO plan version 0 (see below) and it is set for actual and plan. The RA version (0) (also below) is marked as being relevant to settlement. These settings seems to address the error message but I guess we are missing something.

Hai Mikhail
As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
Is the RA version been maintained in OKG2 ?
In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
ENJOY SAP PS
Regards
PP

Projects KKA2_ Results Analysis (Int. Orders/Projects)

Hi,
I have put the results analysis key under the control tab of a WBS element. When doint the KKA2 I am receiving the follwoing message.
I want to post WIP and have done all account settings. could anybody explain the process for this periodic processing of projects how to identify WIP.
I have posted via KB15 costs on this project and now I would expect the a WIP would be identified at this amount???
Thanks Ulrike
No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed
Message no. KJ210
Diagnosis
The valuation of the order or project in results analysis depends on the
    status of the object.
In this case, the object does not have an active status entered in the
    valuation methods in Customizing for WIP calculation and results
    analysis. Consequently, WIP calculation and results analysis cannot find
    a method with which the object can be processed.
Procedure
Decide whether the object should be processed in its current state
    (indicated by its active status in status management) by WIP calculation
    and results analysis.

RA is specific to the period you run for... this is standard behaviour.
Regards

Settlement in CJ88 after succesful results analysis on WBS

Dear All,
When I run CNE1 after i have estimated my PoC on my WBS project, this is succesful. I calculate the results analysis succesfully in KKA2 for my project. When i want to post the settlement of the RA, I receive errors such as "Maintain settlement rule on sender" and "the GL account needs a CO assignment".
My settlement rule is 100% PER and is maintained on every level of the WBS structure except one position which is the Receiver.
Any ideas?
Thanks Debora

Hello Debora
The Error KD 205 is issued during settlement becasue the results analysis is calculating costs of sales on line ID level.
Those costs of sales do add up to zero, but as settlement is checking on line ID level, the message is issued.
To avoid that results analysis is calculating cost of sales if you choose special function B in the valuation method (OKG3).
The system will then calculate negative WIP instead of reserves for
unrealized costs in the case of negative actual costs (see notes 365075 and 385616).
If you do want reserves for unrealized costs being calculated in the case of negative actual costs, but no costs of sales
(no error KD 205 when no settlement rule exists),
you could also change the method of apportionment in OKG3 to 'I'. The reserves for unrealized costs
will then be apportioned in proportion to the actual costs, so no cost of sales will be calculated on line ID level.
hope this helps
Ger

Display document of the results analysis for Project

Hello expert,
I'd like to know if a transaction exists to display the document for which I can find the number in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and which is linked to the displayed line items.
Any idea?
Regards,
Céline O.

Hello,
I'm looking for a transaction to display the document which is created for the calculation of the results analysis.
We can find the number of the document when we run the KKA2 transaction : Menu/ Resutl Analysis/ Display Line Items of result Analysis.
That document number is also shown in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and I'd like to find a way to display it easily ((like FB03 for the accounting document, for example) by using the document number only.
Céline O.

Sales order item report based on results analysis key and status

Hi,
I am trying to find a a report to generate list of sales order items with following selection
        -invoicing status -invoiced/not invoices (other status)
        -result analysis key assigned to this item (VBAP-ABGRS)
        -system status /released/teco
Basically i am CO consultant and not so familiar with the SD statuses. I tried VA05 and V.26 but all required selections are not available in these reports.
If no standard report is available in ERP, i would like to have it in BI. Can some help me with table fields for statuses.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Raghu

Hi Raghu
Go to SE16 and give VBUK table and execute it there you can select the following feilds and then check wheather they are meeting your requirements or not.If they are meeting your requirements then create a new Z report by copying standard VA05 key feilds. and include the other feilds which you need.So you take your ABAP team help
Billing status     FKSTK
Posting Status BUCHK
Overall status GBSTK
Document category VBTYP
Regards
Srinath

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

Problem with Result Analysis report (KKAK)

Hello Experts,
I am facing problem with T-code KKAK, when I am executing this transaction (Results Analysis (RA) on sales orders creates the data for posting to the GL, depending on the sales order (i.e. WIP or COS) ) system is displaying/calculating for all sales order which are already completed (fully shipped and billed), this report displaying in 300 to 400 pages.
My requirement is .. is it possible to display only sales orders which are no completed. This will help alot.
Please help me to solve this problem.
Thanks
Sudheer

Hi,
in the selection screen of KKAK in "Output options" there is a flag "display closed items".
Uncheck this and ensure that all completely processed orders have status closed (CLSD).
Thus they will not be reported anymore.
BR Christian

Result analysis (KKA2)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for