Result Analysis - Profit Percentage based on Revenue

Deare Gurus,
While executing Result Analysis, we see profit percentage on the right side as percentage onthe basis of costs. We would like to view such detail as a percentage of revenue
eg: standard
Revenue - 100
Costs - 80
Profit - 20
Profit percentage = 20/80 = 25%
We want it to be 20/100 = 20%.
Please help!!!!

Hi Babu,
I think your example is not totally clear. From what I understand, you need to calculate a result in percentage based on the result of two other columns. What you can do is to use the first result (from the two columns) as a CKF. And then, to this CKF, use the result calcultation options of the query desinger for percentage.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Diego

Similar Messages

  • Revenue is not visible within results analysis

    Hi Experts,
    Am SD consultant , am not ware of about KKAK transaction and can you please throw ur ideas on below issue.
    In Tcode- KKAK Actual result analysis for the sales order , revenue is not visable with in result analysis for sales order.
    Can you please give your suggestion how can it get update tehre.
    And also let me know this KkAK transaction details can see after creation of billing document or before billing document creation

    The show interface command should give you a lot of details on the link usage.
    You could watch the load, 5 minute input rate/output rate fields before compression and after compression to find
    the realistic usage.
    I am pasting a sample show interface output below
    Router#sh int s0
    Serial0 is up, line protocol is up
    Hardware is HD64570
    Internet address is 192.168.100.2/24
    MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
    Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec)
    Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
    Last clearing of "show interface" counters 13:32:47
    Input queue: 1/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0
    Queueing strategy: weighted fair
    Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
    Conversations 0/2/256 (active/max active/max total)
    Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
    5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 4 packets/sec
    5 minute output rate 2000 bits/sec, 4 packets/sec
    98631 packets input, 8680095 bytes, 0 no buffer
    Received 30857 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
    2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
    98332 packets output, 8924943 bytes, 0 underruns
    0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
    0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
    0 carrier transitions
    DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up

  • Automatic Reversal of Result Analysis Posting

    Dear Experts,
    I would like to ask for suggestions in solving below case in my current project:
    1. Project is created for sales of power solutions. Most of them are long-term, thus cost-based revenue recognition method is applied.
    2. Result analysis with cost-based method (03) is periodically executed for project. Therefore, every month there are some revenue deferral/ accrual posting calculated based on actual cost - before the project is completely billed.
    3. It is expected for revenue deferral/ accrual posting resulted from result analysis to be automatically reversed immediately in the next period (e.g. if RA is executed for July 2014, reversal posting needs to be immediately posted with posting date Aug 1st, 2014).
    At first we were thinking to define new document type specifically for the result analysis posting, and perform mass reversal using F.80 transaction. But then we came to realize that result analysis entries are posted after settlement is executed -and accounting document generated from settlement transaction cannot be directly reversed in finance.
    Anyone has encountered the same issue? How do we reverse result analysis posting without reversing the whole settlement transaction?
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Analistia

    Hello,
    First you need to configure the functionality from the bellow path
    SPRO Financial AccountingGeneral Ledger Accounting Business Transaction  Manual Accruals  Basic Settings
    Once Engine configured Accrual document can be created through the easy access menu.
    AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral LedgerPeriodic Processing   Manual Accruals  Create Accrual Objects
    Execution of Accrual documents
    AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral LedgerPeriodic Processing   Manual Accruals  Start Periodic Run
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Revenue Recognition Functionality through Result Analysis (RA) key

    Hi all,
    We have a requirement for Revenue recognition, Can anyone guide me Revenue recognition functionality through Result Analysis (RA) key  and functions of RA Key .
    Regards,
    Lal Maheswararao

    Hi Makrand,
    Thank you for your Valuable reply. Actually I am looking Specifically for the Revenue Recognition functionality in Cloud computing Business Scenarios. Like the income has to be recognized over the period of time on the basis of service provided. And it should calculate Percentage of completion for calculating revenues and Cost and how much profit it has to be recognised over the period.
    These functions will possible through Result Analysis method. but i have very limited knowledge about RA method.
    Can you please explain in general how Result analysis method will work and if possible with necessary configuration.
    Regards,
    Lal Maheswararao

  • Results Analysis - Cost based POC method without margin

    Hello Experts,
    I would like to use the standard method - 03 , Cost based POC method but without margin. That means,
    1. System will calculate POC based on the actual costs and planned costs.
    2. Calulated revenue is created by multiplying the POC and the planned revenue.
    Here, Till the actual revenue is more than the planned costs, calculated revenue should be made equal to the actual costs.
    I have created standard method -03 and in the expert mode i have changed the profit indicator to " E - Profit Realization if actual revenue greater than planned costs"
    This works for first period when there is no actual revenue. After the actual revenue which is less than the planned cost,
    this does not work.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestion
    Thanks
    Regards
    Srinivasan Desingh

    in our projects I used to sit with CO consultant and do a lot of RA testing by changing different fields and finally reach the required result. Hit and Trial method (so it is hard to remember exactly what happen while changing a single field as there are many fields in expert mode). May be you can also try the same.

  • What is RESULT ANALYSIS,REVENUE RECOGNITION in PS

    hi gurus
    can any one explains me abt revenue recoginition and result analysis in Project Systems
    thx
    regards
    mahesh

    RA cannot be done with out POC
    POC is an essential requirement to calculate the accruals and deferrals
    There are various RA methods which basically calculate the POC
    eg
    Cost based -> POC = act cost/ plan cost
    Rev based -> POC = act rev/ plan rev
    Statistical -> POC can be entered manaully using statistical key figures
    Progress Analysis -> POC is based on value from Progress Analysis - you need to set this up if you are using Progress analysis
    So basically you can do RA without Progress Analysis to calculate POC. The determination of this depends on your company's financial policies and regulatory requirements in the country you are operating

  • Revenue Recognition Accounting in PS Results Analysis

    I am trying to understand certain aspects in the accountng involved for the process of Results Anaysis. In my case, we have configured RA for revenue recognition and all is working well. We have a project that has a billing element and an account assignment element under it.  Invoices go to the billing element, costs go to the aa elemet. RA key is entered on the billing element. RA calculates Revenues and COS and the billing element settles them to PA. While calculated, defered and unbilled revenue post to FI using OKG8 configuration settings. All is fine on the mechanics of this.
    What I do not understand is the treatment for the actual costs. Are they supposed to be settled to PA as well? If so...then, the costs seem to double up in PA (COS from RA calculated based on the actual costs via the billing element and Actual costs themselves from from the aa element). Are the actual costs supposed to remain in the aa WBS element and not be settled? It seems unbalanced. Can anyone explain?

    Hi,
    Settlement process involves a sender object and a receiver object. Receiver object is the cost object on which actual cost incurred in the sender object is settled. RA is one of the receiver objects for settlement, but not the only one.
    Your scenario seems to be periodic calculation of WIP (result analysis) and final settlement of production orders.
    The periodic WIP (RA) postings done in FI are reversed and replaced with COGM when the production order is finally delivered. The entries in FI at this stage is based on the "Standard Price" maintained in the material master (depending on the valuation variant). Then the final settlement of production order takes place and the total actual cost is arrived at. The difference in cost between "actual cost" and standard price" is settled to RA as a separate entry.
    The reversal of entries when the production is delivered (as explained above) ensures that cost is not reckoned twice.
    Hope this explanation meets your requirement.
    If so, you may like to close the thread. Otherwise, please revert.
    Muraleedharan.R

  • Calculate percentage based on checkbox results in Numbers iOS

    Using Numbers iOS, I've created a gradebook to keep track of my students' progress.
    I have used the Checkbox format for my results, and I would like to create a formula that will calculate a percentage based off of the checked results.
    What formula could I use to convert the TRUE and FALSE results from my checkbox cells into 1s and 0s, add up the score, and then convert the total score into a percentage?
    I've attached a picture to help explain what it is I'm trying to do here. I'd like to keep the checkboxes cells as checkboxes and only have the results converted in the "Grade" Column.
    Thanks for your help!

    Hi joey,
    Here is an approach. The screenshot is from OSX but the formula should work well for you.
    The formula in F1 =COUNTIF(A1:E1,TRUE())÷5
    My reporting cell is formatted as %.
    quinn

  • Freight revenue is allocated by profit center, based on the number of units

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    I am facing one issue in sales order processing.
    The Sales order is getting created through an inbound IDOC.
    The data (Condtion type and Condition value) for Freight will get populated at at the header level at will get allocated to the line Items wrt quantity.
    The requirement is - "Freight revenue is allocated by profit center, based on the number of units shipped".
    Please let me know how to achieve this requirement.
    Regards,
    Bhaskar

    In VOFM- Reqirements- Pricing- You need to create a new requirement- Routine.
    That Routine should calculate
    To check Frieght condition(i.e. ZFRT) at the header in the sales order, if tcode - "VA01" 
    If Freight conditon ZFRT found then transfer that reqirement to item level  by data transfer,
    IF Freight conditon is found at the item level then allocate revenue by = profit center XXXX to XXXXX , (based on MARC- PRCTR ) in MM03  number of units shipped .
    You might also need to configure Account determination for this freight conditon to post to correct G/L A/C.
    This is an Enhancement.
    Good luck

  • Percentage based on two result of the columns

    Hi all,
    My report loos like
    Type     posting order  Number of records  Date diff    %
    A     1          1        1
    A     2          1       1
    A     3          1       1
       Result                          3     3                 100%
    B     1          1       1
    B     2          1       1          
    B     3          1       0
       Result          3          2                  66%
    As u can see that i need to calculate the percentage based on the result of two columns.
    Can u please throw some light ..
    Watin for reply
    Thanks
    Babu

    Hi Babu,
    I think your example is not totally clear. From what I understand, you need to calculate a result in percentage based on the result of two other columns. What you can do is to use the first result (from the two columns) as a CKF. And then, to this CKF, use the result calcultation options of the query desinger for percentage.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Diego

  • Sales Analysis - Gross Profit Percentage

    Hello,
    This is a very basic question that hopefully somebody can help me with.
    I ran the Sales Analysis by Customers --> Orders --> for a specific customer.  When I look at the detailed report of the Sales Analysis for this particular customer there are two orders.  I'm confused by how SAP is calculating the gross profit percentage.
    For example, one of the invoices has a sales amount of $76,160.00 and a gross profit of $22,580.00.  The gross profit percentage on the analysis is 42.143. 
    Shouldn't the GP % really be 29.648%?  I used the following formula to calculate this:  (Gross Profit/Sales Amount)*100. 
    What formula is SAP using? 
    Thank you,
    Amanda

    I get it.  It's calculating, however, it's setup on that tab.
    I've been able to calculate both percentages now.
    Thank you so much for your help.  I knew it had to be basic!
    Thanks!
    Amanda

  • Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

    Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

    Could be one of these possibilities:
    1) Controlling Area set is wrong
    2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
    3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
    You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
    Assign Points if useful....

  • Update Result Analysis not allow for category E(Revenue)

    Hi,
    While defining update for Result Analysis for Sales Order Costing - Controlling Area -  RA Version - RA Key for WIP in Sales ORder - Line ID as Revenue - and category E(Revenue), put Secondary GL against  Cost/Revenue in tcode OKG4, system shows message as :
    Use only categories "A", "K", and "N" in WIP calculation
    Message no. KQ115
    Diagnosis
    In the valuation method, you chose WIP calculation as the results analysis type.
    Procedure
    For WIP calculation, you can only update costs ( category K), settled costs (category A), and costs not to be included (category N [revenue], for example).
    As a result while doing WIP on Sales order in tcode KKA3 system shows message as "No update of line IDs specified in CO area 0810 version 0 RA key 000004" in message no KJ208.
    Here RA KEY 000004 is used for WIP on Sales Order. We have defined 4 line ids which are assigned with RA Key for WIP on Actual Cost against category  K (Cost) for 3 line ids and 1 line is used with category A (Settled cost). Same way for RA key Sales Order I have to mention against category E (Revenue). But system does not allow me.
    Best Regards,
    Samat Roy

    Hi Dadoni,
    In OKG3 (Valuation Method) there are two different RA Keys I have maintained. RA Key 000002(WIP of Actual Cost) which is used with production order and RA Key 000004(Result Analysis for Sales Order) is maintained with Sales Order. Both the RA Keys have common status which are REL, DLV, PREL and TECO. Is it correct or wrong staus for Sales Order WIP ? Here status number area 1> PREL, 2> REL, 3> DLV and 4> TECO.
    Kindly tell me for RA Key 000004(WIP on Sales Order) you have mentioned only 3 status which are REL, TECO and FNBL. Is it necessary to maintained more status for Sales order WIP. What will be its status number and inside parameter setting from RA Type to other indicator setting ?
    Best Regards,
    Samrat

  • Result Analysis , Settlement and Revenue

    Dear Gurus,
    I really appreciate if you can help me in resolving the below issue.
    We are using results analysis and settlement processes in our project
    We want to recognize the revenue before billing.
    Is there any way I can post actual revene to financial accounting before doing
    billing through Settlement.
    I would be greatul to you guys if some one can help me at the earliest .
    Thanks,
    Viswas Anantharangachar

    Hi,
    In my understanding this is the requirement of Revenue recognition functionality implementation. This is more SD than PS function. Please use T-Code ‘VF44’ , or ‘VF47’.
    Please remember that the RR functionality was not enough stable in the ver 4.7 so you must have ECC5 in place.
    Enjoy SAP….
    Don’t forget to give points if its useful ans.
    Namskar,
    Ketan Dave

  • Sales order item report based on results analysis key and status

    Hi,
    I am trying to find a a report to generate list of sales order items with following selection
            -invoicing status -invoiced/not invoices (other status)
            -result analysis key assigned to this item (VBAP-ABGRS)
            -system status /released/teco
    Basically i am CO consultant and not so familiar with the SD statuses. I tried VA05 and V.26 but all required selections are not available in these reports.
    If no standard report is available in ERP, i would like to have it in BI. Can some help me with table fields for statuses.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi Raghu
    Go to SE16 and give VBUK table and execute it there you can select the following feilds and then check wheather they are meeting your requirements or not.If they are meeting your requirements then create a new Z report by copying standard VA05 key feilds. and include the other feilds which you need.So you take your ABAP team help
    Billing status     FKSTK
    Posting Status  BUCHK
    Overall status  GBSTK
    Document category VBTYP
    Regards
    Srinath

Maybe you are looking for

  • Native SQL "Table does not exist in database"

    Hi Developers, I'm doing a database connection to an Oracle db and trying to read data using native SQL - I keep getting the runtime error "table does not exist in database" on the statement Fetch Next Cursor. The following is the code snippet (I've

  • DB lookup - is there a way ?

    Hi, I have a simple requirement and I'd like to use brfplus for that if possible - Table in ABAP with 100k entries (legacy material number and customer material number)  - I'd like to create a call to BRFplus which would take all lines of a document

  • How to connect ndr3700 to airport extreme

    how do i connect my extreme to existing netgear NDR3700

  • Reverse Compatibility with WPA2 in iBooks?

    Hello. I own a 1.07 GHz iBook that is about 27 months old, and I bought an AirPort Extreme card with it. I've read that the AirPort Utility version 4.2 adds WPA2 support to AirPort Extreme base stations, but does it do anything for the firmware of Ai

  • Stop transfering data hang ups?

    Firefox intermittently hangs up entire system while "transfering data" from a website linking. I have to cold boot to get control of my system again. How to I stop or prevent website loadings from stealing my computer?