Return-Code 99 of integration-process in TR  SXI_CACHE

Hallo,
in TR SXI_CACHE my integration-process has the return-code 99 (process cannot be activated). On selecting in the tree (left side) and dobble-click of my process following comes up:
</properties>
- <lines>
  <line id="208" predid="207" succid="5" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="213" predid="7" succid="13" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="214" predid="13" succid="9" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="215" predid="9" succid="59" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="217" predid="59" succid="97" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="219" predid="97" succid="89" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="220" predid="89" succid="21" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
The XML page cannot be displayed
Cannot view XML input using XSL style sheet. Please correct the error and then click the Refresh button, or try again later.
End tag 'prperty' does not match the start tag 'property'. Error processing resource 'file:///C:/W2KMF/Profiles/schmitf/Loc...
<property id="59" guid="d56d20d4195e11daafd60003ba0ff8f5" name="SendMsgSyncResponse" counter="0" type="EXPR" valueType=""...
n-left:1em;text-indent:-2em">   <line id="222" predid="21" succid="23" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
  <line id="224" predid="23" succid="25" parentid="207" order="0" linetype="DEFAULT" />
After activating the process once more the detail-information comes up. Then i see the error steps (Message-Type = E). So for example:
Der Wert des Ausdrucks '&CH_EVENT_TAB_DATA.PAYLOAD.ERROR&' kann nicht als Quelle einer Zuweisung dienen (expression cannot be the source of an assignment)
But in the integration-process this seam to be good. What can i do? Delete the container-element and create a new one?
Thanks in advance,
Frank

Hallo,
when i have a look at the details after acitvation my integration-process (with returncode 99) I make changes in my process. But after refresh there are the old items are still there. What´s about the Button "delete runtime Version" in the acivation step? Can i so delete this process in my cash? Have i to make a new integraion-process-object? After copy one process and giving a new name the same problems occures? What is the best solution?
Thanks,
Frank

Similar Messages

  • Process Flows: Return Code or Message Severity

    Hi all,
    I am trying to get a decent email system set up that will let me know which part of our OWB ETL load has warnings or errors.
    I have one main Process Flow that calls several other process flows. On both levels, I need to know if any errors or warnings were encountered during execution.
    There is a function WB_GET_RETURN_CODE which I hoped to use to get the return codes of the process flows, but while testing, I noticed that there are not return codes for process flows.
    My backup solution is to check ALL_RT_AUDIT_EXEC_MESSAGES if there are any records in there. If there are, I check if they are ERROR or WARNING. Would this be a good solution to my problem?
    Or is there a better way to find errors/warnings of process flows?

    HI VRV,
    Step 1: Goto Display messages on right click of your Process chain
    Step 2: Goto "Chain" tab and copy "Variant" and "Instance"
    Step 3: Goto SE11 and Select table RSPCPROCESSLOG
    Step 4: Paste the "Variant" and "Instance" and execute it, and the value of the other fields are returned: LOG_ID, TYPE, BATCHDATE and BATCHTIME
    Step 5: Goto SE38 and enter RSPC_PROCESS_FINISH
    Step 6: Enter the values in the fields received from RSPCPROCESSLOG  table. Additionally, make the STATE as "G‟ -> Execute
    Then your Process Chain will turn to green and proceed further......
    Hope this helps........
    Regards,
    Suman

  • Return code 99 in BPM

    Hi,
      I tried to activate manaully (SXI_CACHE) in BPM and also cleared full cache in RWB.  But even thought the return code is 99 for my BPM processs.  I am not using any sychronous communcation my versionis PI 7.0 with sp 9.  Please let me know is there any other way of making return code as 0
    regards,
    Dhil

    Hi Dhil,
    Perform a complete cache refresh using the url
    http://host:port/CPACache/refresh?mode=full
    u hav to use PIDIRUSER for this. After cache refresh, activate ur Integration Process in the SXI_CACHE tcode.
    Anil

  • Return code 1073807364 (0x40010004) on Windows when using COM to script Illustrator and Photoshop

    Hi,
    I'm using python via COM to run Illustrator and Photoshop on a Windows machine and I occasionally get this return code in python from the subprocess: 1073807364 (0x40010004). I've done some googling and it seems to indicate that that's a Windows return code for "the process is still running". Is it safe for me to let the process continue when I see that return code? Or does that indicate something else?
    Thanks.

    I have similar setup to yours.
    From my point of view you need more RAM. I have 16GB. Than you will need to change in preferences to adjust memory used by PS and Illustrator. Maybe take a look at virtual memory in Windows and disable aero effects.
    Disk. It is better to have one disk for system (eg.SSD) and one for documents. But don't buy something like WD Green series that is intended for backup.
    Graphics. It is not a major player I think for your tasks, but OpenGl can speed up rendering in Photoshop and Illustrator.
    When exporting AI with layers to PSD it will always show "out of memory" unless you turn off anti aliasing.
    and the most important thing reinstall Windows after some time... It will work faster.

  • Integration Process w/ return code 99

    Have a very weird situation with an integration process. In our development environment, in SXI_CACHE, it returns a return code of 99 signalling some type of error. The weird problem is that the process works just fine. It's an IDOC to flat file scenario and the flat file gets generated each time perfectly. This is with the process status of 99 in SXI_CACHE.
    However, when the process is moved to QA, it does not work at all. The messages get stuck in SXMB_MONI with message "message has error on outbd. side". When I click on the PE to view the error, it appears the workflow behind the process is defined incorrectly becasuse in the event trace I see:
    <b>Workflow definition of task 'WS90100009' cannot be activated.</b>
    The reason for this error is
    <b>Container element '_CRL_I001ZMTRLNO_0025' not available</b>
    What is killing me is that this same error occurs in our development environment, yet the process still works fine.
    Can someone possible explain what the container error might mean and how to fix? The workflow never gets kicked off because the definition is not active.
    Thanks

    all green in that transaction...
    in the process, i have two branches.. one to receive a MATMAS the other to receive a ZCLFMAS IDOC....
    a file gets generated when any of the following conditions occur
    - both IDOC's are received for the same material
    - only MATMAS or ZCLFMAS are received and the other message type is not received within 3 minutes... we have time controls on the two branches
    the error is in the initial receive step...keeps saying that container element is not available yet I have no idea what that means

  • Integration Process is not displayed in SXI_CACHE

    Hi Experts,
    I am getting the below eror when I try to excute the SOAP -> JDBC BPM scenario
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
    The integration Process is not displayed in the SXI_CACHE. Done with all type of cache refresh, restarted the server also.
    What could be the problem?
    Earlier I was getting the similar error for non-BPM scenario, just refreshed the cache in Admin, IR, ID and in SXI_CACHE and it solved the issue.
    But here the Integration Process is not displayed after doing the above step.
    Note: Always the SXI_CACHE is in ERROR status(Red color symbol)
    Everytime before executing the scenario,  I refresh the cache in SXI_CACHE. Once I done with the refresh, I get the belwo status
    1. Cache contents are being refreshed (Yellow color)
    2. Error during last attempt to refresh cache (Red Color)
    Please share your suggestions to solve this issue.
    Regards
    Sara

    Hi Sara
    Go to SXI_CACHE , then from Menu XI Runtime Cache choose Start Delta Cache RefreshF6. Try this, , After clicking wait for sometime to refresh.
    Path Prefix set to “/dir/CacheRefresh”.
    https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700003163902004E/HowTo_handle_XI_30_Caches.pdf
    Also check out the role of the user using SU01. are you using PIISUSER?
    Also refer:
    How to handle cache in PI - https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0332b2a-eb97-2910-b6ba-dbe52a01be34
    Thanks

  • Integration Process is not displaying in SXI_CACHE

    Hi all,
    My Integration Process is not getting displayed in SXI_CACHE.
    After configuration when I executed the scenario ..it went in to error "NO RECEIVER FOUND"
    when i checked in SXI_CAHE the cache contents are not updated.
    My Integration Process is not displaying in SXI_CACHE .....in not there in the list,this is the frist BPM in this machine.
    Inside IR the Integration Process is activated with no error.(F7).
    What is wrong with my configuration, have any one faced the same issue?
    Thanks for your time and reply.
    Regards
    Sunil

    Hi Sunil,
    Go to SXI_CACHE , then from Menu XI Runtime Cache choose Start Delta Cache RefreshF6. Try this, , After clicking wait for sometime to refresh.
    Path Prefix set to “/dir/CacheRefresh”.
    https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700003163902004E/HowTo_handle_XI_30_Caches.pdf
    Also check out the role of the user using SU01. are you using PIISUSER?
    Also refer:
    How to handle cache in PI - https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0332b2a-eb97-2910-b6ba-dbe52a01be34
    Also check
    Does PIISUSER have the role SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER_MAIN. Is profile generated for the role?
    See SAP Note 1030255.
    Some more advices:
    1.Go to Environment -
    > Click on Clear SLD data cache.
    2.Tools -> Cache Notification
    You will find at that there will be some red dots if u refresh
    Please click on then and refresh once again
    Regards,
    Vinod.

  • Not able to transfer Integration Process in ID. Also not seen in SXI_Cache

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying a BPM scenario. I have created all design objects along with Integration Process in IR and saved and activated the same. Issue is : I am not able to transfer the Integration Scenario from IR in ID. I am also not able to see the created integration process in SXI_Cache under Integration Processes node. Can you please suggest some thing related to this issue. Thank you.

    hi,
    >>>I have created all design objects along with Integration Process in IR and saved and activated the same. Issue is : I am not able to transfer the Integration Scenario from IR in ID.
    but in order to use Integration Scenario in ID you need
    to create it in IR first and Integration Process is not the same as
    integration scenario
    you can only transfer Integration Process to ID as an Integration Process
    (under services without party node)
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk
    http://www.mypigenie.com - XI/PI FAQ

  • HT1998 Why can't I uninstall AirPort 4.2 from my Windows 7 PC..  I downloading and reinstalling the 4.2 but during the installation process I get an error.  It reads...    "1608: Unable to Create InstallDriver instance Return Code -2147024894

    Why can't I uninstall AirPort 4.2 from my Windows 7 PC..  I tried downloading and reinstalling the 4.2 but during the installation process I get an error.  It reads...    "1608: Unable to Create InstallDriver instance Return Code -2147024894

    You should not install it again..
    Boot the computer into safe mode and try the uninstall again.
    No luck you will have to manually uninstall which is a pain. Delete the files and open regedit and delete the registry entries.. better still use the system restore to go back to a previous system where you had no 4.2 installed..
    Or just ignore it and install the latest 5.6.1 and if it gives trouble well do a clean install of windows.

  • PDW : DWLoader in Execute Process Task, Success Value return code

    Hi,
    I'm using SSIS Execute Process Task to call DWLoader.
    It seems the Success Value return code is 2.
    Which is working fine except that after all data are loaded in my table a 0 return code is sent.
    And so my task fails.
    Any idea how to handle this ?
    Thx for your help !
    Regards,
    Bertrandr

    My understanding is - When DWLoader process returns 2, everything goes fine but in another case it returns 0 then task fails.
    You can Set: FailTaskIfReturnCodeIsNotSuccessValue
    to FALSE so that task will not care about return values
    But in case of any other error such as syntax - save
    error in MyVariable and verify if MyVariable != ""
    -Vaibhav Chaudhari

  • Failed (why else would I post). Error creating an image of Drive D:, rc = 2. Return Code -2147467259 0x80004005. "Not enough storage is available to process this command".

    Seems a common set of Return Codes to post so apologies that's not specific.
    To me appears the issue is related to the "Not enough storage is available to process this command" log entry. Looked into it and some SCCM 2007 issues that were related to too many sessions to the site server, but even after rebooting my MDT server
    I get the same issue.
    The server I am attempting to capture has a 60gb VHD with around 30gb actually used. The MDT Server has over 100GB free space.
    Here is from BDD.log:
      Console > Turning on VERIFY option for network share
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:30 PM
    0 (0x0000)
      Console > Scanning files and directories...
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:30 PM
    0 (0x0000)
      Console > Error imaging drive [D:\]
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:30 PM
    0 (0x0000)
      Console > Not enough storage is available to process this command.
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:31 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    Return code from command = 2 ZTIBackup
    10/10/2014 12:56:31 PM 0 (0x0000)
    Error creating an image of drive D:, rc = 2
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:31 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    Event 41036 sent: Error creating an image of drive D:, rc = 2
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:31 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    ZTIBackup COMPLETED.  Return Value = 2
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:32 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    ZTI ERROR - Non-zero return code by ZTIBackup, rc = 2
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:32 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    Event 41002 sent: ZTI ERROR - Non-zero return code by ZTIBackup, rc = 2
    ZTIBackup 10/10/2014 12:56:32 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    Command completed, return code = -2147467259
    LiteTouch 10/10/2014 12:56:33 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    Litetouch deployment failed, Return Code = -2147467259  0x80004005
    LiteTouch 10/10/2014 12:56:33 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    Event 41014 sent: Litetouch deployment failed, Return Code = -2147467259  0x80004005
    LiteTouch 10/10/2014 12:56:33 PM
    0 (0x0000)
    I'll post below full logs.

    imagex reported:
      Console > Error imaging drive [D:\]
      Console > Not enough storage is available to process this command.
    obvious question is: do you have enough free space on
    "\\arcadmin3\deploymentshare$\Captures\SIMSERVER.wim"
    Keith Garner - Principal Consultant [owner] -
    http://DeploymentLive.com

  • Integration Processes deleted but still in SXI_CACHE

    I'm trying to understand why old integration processes would still reflect in transaction SXI_CACHE although I have done the following:
    1.     Deleted them & all references from Integration Repository & Integration Directory.
    2.     Deleted the Runtime Version from SXI_CACHE.
    3.     Deleted the old workflows using transaction SWWL.
    4.     Did delta & full cache refreshes from SXI_CACHE.
    How do you do a thorough clean up of old Integration Processes no longer required?
    Edited by: Marius de Wet on Sep 29, 2008 4:38 PM

    Integration process created is also assigned in ID,so delete Integration Process from ID then delete from IR.
    Now
    Refresh SLD Cache and CPA Cache
    http://<host>:5<sys#>00/CPACache/refresh?mode=delta Delta CPA cache refresh
    http://<host>:5<sys#>00/CPACache/refresh?mode=full Full cache refresh
    SLD Cache - Used to cache the objects you created in SLD to runtime.You can check if SLD cache is updated or not in Integration repostory or Integration Directory.
    Edited by: Dharamveer Gaur on Sep 30, 2008 12:37 PM

  • Significance of IP Return Code in SXI_CACHE

    Hi All
    For us under 'SXI_CACHE' all the BPMs are having return code 99 and same kind of
    error for all
    'xxxx' is not a component of data object 'PAYLOAD'
    90% of the BPMs are working fine.
    But the rest are not getting instantiated and in SXMB_MONI we are getting the following
    error
    <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">SYSTEM_FAILURE_INTERNAL</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>An internal error has occurred</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    We have got one SAP Note : 890760 for the error -" 'xxxx' is not a component of data object 'PAYLOAD' "
    but confused whether to apply or not bcoz 90% of ccBPMs are working properly even with this error.
    Is it mandatory that BPMs must have Return Code '0' in SXI_CACHE ??
    If yes why some BPMs are still working properly with  Return Code '99' ??
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance
    Chemmanz

    Hi,
    <i>but confused whether to apply or not bcoz 90% of ccBPMs are working properly even with this error.</i>
    Do any of these BPMs check(using a switch for example) on an attribute value of a the incoming payload?
    Basically BPMs in sxi_cache having a return code of 0, mean that, they donot have any errors(syntactic/semantic) as such.
    This helps us as one of the debugging steps, in case of any error, while executing a scenario.
    Am not sure if this would technically effect anything else.
    Regards,
    Smitha.

  • Integration Process in SXI_CACHE

    hi,
    i am trying to activate the BPM from SXI_CACHE from the "Integration Processes" but i don't see it here.
    I have activate the Process from the Integration Directory.
    I read some blogs for BPM errors and some suggested to start the BPM from within SXI_CACHE.
    Any tips why i am not finding the BPM in the SXI_CACHE under Integration Processes.
    Thanks,
    Tirumal

    Hi Tirumal,
    First you need to run the scenario, then you can see the Runtime Version of the BPM in the SXI_CACHE.
    /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/11/28/inactive-integration-process-ip-at-run-time
    https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700003163902004E/HowTo_handle_XI_30_Caches.pdf
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Moorthy

  • Return code (SY-SUBRC) for the EXCEPTION will not be processed

    Hi,
    when I was doing the EPC check i have approached this messgae.
    Return code (SY-SUBRC) for the EXCEPTION will not be processed after CALL FUNCTION
    'CU_READ_RGDIR'
    (You can turn off this check by setting all EXCEPTIONS to 0)
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
    Any pointers on how to handle this.
    Regards
    Rohini.

    Hi Rohini,
    Try doing something like this.
    TYPE-POOLS: hrpay.
    DATA: w_pernr              TYPE          p0000-pernr ,
          w_buffer             TYPE          hrpay_buffer,
          w_no_authority_check TYPE          xfeld       ,
          w_molga              TYPE          t500l-molga ,
          t_in_rgdir           TYPE TABLE OF pc261.
    CALL FUNCTION 'CU_READ_RGDIR'
      EXPORTING
        persnr             = w_pernr
        buffer             = w_buffer
        no_authority_check = w_no_authority_check
      IMPORTING
        molga              = w_molga
      TABLES
        in_rgdir           = t_in_rgdir
      EXCEPTIONS
        OTHERS             = 0.

Maybe you are looking for