"Return for Correction" button in SSHR approval notification directing to External URL

In SSHR approval workflow notification mail, if we click on "Request for Correction" button, an incorrect URL is loaded.
1 - Where should this be setup to direct to the particular notification in workflist in Oracle page?
2 - How can we remove this functionality in the notification?
Thanks,
Sumanth

Check the Node attributes in the Return for Correction process through workflow builder.  That should tell you where it will be sending the email.

Similar Messages

  • Workflow Return for correction RFC history not appearing

    Hi -
    I have built a custom new workflow in Oracle Learning Management.
    I am using the workflow attribute WF_NOTE to capture the comments of the approvers.
    When the approval moves from one approver to another, it successfully captures any comments made by the previous approvers and displays it to the next approver.
    However, when any of the approvers click on return for correction ( RFC ) button and the notification moves to the creator, the approval history is blank and does not have the comments made by the approver about why he is returning for correction.
    Any insight?
    Thanks

    In actual it should update only that SIT record which is currently under consideration and not allow other records to modify.Ayaz
    this is a very valid question .. and same thing happens with EIT as well. This happens because when you create or update EITs, SITs you can do more than one at a time at the time of creation/ updation. So when approver go to update action or send it back for return for correction you create/ update multiple EITs and SITs as all of that go in single transaction.
    Let us know if you find any solution for this one.

  • Return for correction RFC history not appearing

    Hi -
    I have built a custom new workflow in Oracle Learning Management.
    I am using the workflow attribute WF_NOTE to capture the comments of the approvers.
    When the approval moves from one approver to another, it successfully captures any comments made by the previous approvers and displays it to the next approver.
    However, when any of the approvers click on return for correction ( RFC ) button and the notification moves to the creator, the approval history is blank and does not have the comments made by the approver about why he is returning for correction.
    Any insight?
    Thanks

    In actual it should update only that SIT record which is currently under consideration and not allow other records to modify.Ayaz
    this is a very valid question .. and same thing happens with EIT as well. This happens because when you create or update EITs, SITs you can do more than one at a time at the time of creation/ updation. So when approver go to update action or send it back for return for correction you create/ update multiple EITs and SITs as all of that go in single transaction.
    Let us know if you find any solution for this one.

  • Return for correction from asynchronous page

    HI ,
    I have a process for Contingent Worker Placment. I am initiating the process and have 2 approvers in the supervisor hirerachy.
    but requirement is that after these 2 approvers we need to have the final approval from another team. but they ll not get any notification. I ll put all the transaction details into the table n show that to the use. from there the approval group can do multiple actions like Return for Correction, approval, rejectiion etc.
    To achive this , I have blocked the workflow after 2 approvers.After this the txn details are put into the table from where the final approval group can either select approve , reject or Return fo rCorrection. When they click on Approval, the workflow blocked activty will be compelted with a result of Approve and if they click reject it will complete activity with reject status.
    Bothe are wokring fine. but RFC is not working. From the Admin group, I am able to launch the RFC page, but from there not able to complete the blocked activity of workflow and resume workflow as the RFC CO is a seeded CO>
    please advise.
    Regards,
    Preeti

    Dear Priyanka,
    Please refer following Metalink Doc ID's it will resolve your problem:
    1. Return For Correction Errors With "You Have Insufficient Privileges For the Current Operation. Please Contact your System Administrator." (Doc ID 1072042.1)
    2. Error When Users with no Responsibility Use Return For Correction (Doc ID 1381514.1)
    Regards,
    Kathan Bhatt
    *** Kindly mark Helpful/Correct if satisfied ***

  • Return for correction

    HI ,
    I have a process for Contingent Worker Placment. I am initiating the process and have 2 approvers in the supervisor hirerachy.
    but requirement is that after these 2 approvers we need to have the final approval from another team. but they ll not get any notification. I ll put all the transaction details into the table n show that to the use. from there the approval group can do multiple actions like Return for Correction, approval, rejectiion etc.
    To achive this , I have blocked the workflow after 2 approvers.After this the txn details are put into the table from where the final approval group can either select approve , reject or Return fo rCorrection. When they click on Approval, the workflow blocked activty will be compelted with a result of Approve and if they click reject it will complete activity with reject status.
    Bothe are wokring fine. but RFC is not working. From the Admin group, I am able to launch the RFC page, but from there not able to complete the blocked activity of workflow and resume workflow as the RFC CO is a seeded CO>
    please advise.
    Regards,
    Preeti

    Check the Node attributes in the Return for Correction process through workflow builder.  That should tell you where it will be sending the email.

  • Talent Management - Return for Correction

    Hi,
    When the manager clicks on "Delete" button on the Return for Correction notification, the appraisal of the employee gets lost. How to avoid this? Is any way to personalize this delete button? If it is a standard functionality, how could we rollback the lost record?
    Thanks in advance

    I'm afraid this is standard functionality. It might be changed in R12. I try to remove the possibility of this happening by removing the function. But, unfortunately, this affects all notifications.

  • Return For Correction-EIT

    Hello All,
    We have registered an Extra Information Type and enabled security for Employee self service responsibility.Every thing is working fine except return for correction feature. Approver is able to return the notification for correction but when requester opens the returned notification  and clicks on "Continue Action" link, he is not able to see the information type and getting note as "Under your current responsibility, no information types are available for this person"(May be this page is defaulted to some responsibility other than Employee self service ). He is not even able to see "Switch responsibility" list of values.
    It seems i have missed something during setup. Kindly share some ideas to fix this issue and let me know if you need more information(Note that i am very new to this forum and this this my first thread)
    Thanks
    Dileep

    In actual it should update only that SIT record which is currently under consideration and not allow other records to modify.Ayaz
    this is a very valid question .. and same thing happens with EIT as well. This happens because when you create or update EITs, SITs you can do more than one at a time at the time of creation/ updation. So when approver go to update action or send it back for return for correction you create/ update multiple EITs and SITs as all of that go in single transaction.
    Let us know if you find any solution for this one.

  • Workflows - reminders / Approvals / return for correction etc

    Hi
    Can anyone help, We are trying to set up an automated Business Process Matrix, bascially we have people that need to submit reports (annually / Monthly / Quarterly) and we want to be able to
    Send them an email say 1 week before the due date (and then another say 2 days before due date.
    When they submit the document I want to be notified that they've uploaded the document to a business process list and be able to approve it or return for correction
    Last but not least – would like to be able to keep a historic library of the documents
    Looked on google and can see how to do it with sharepoint designer – easy – but our company have denied us access to it – and we have to pay a team to do anything in designer !!!!

    hi,
    You're stuck without SPD for the first requirement, but I’m sure your specialised team would welcome a bit of direction :). My comments in bold
    “Send them an email say 1 week before the due date (and then another say 2 days before due date"
    You can use the ‘Information Management Policy’ method as described in
    this blog article by Laura Rogers (it’s for MOSS and WSS but works in SP2010 also). SPD required. Alternative is custom timer job which would be dev – not ideal.
    "When they submit the document I want to be notified that they've uploaded the document to a business process list and be able to approve it or return for correction"
    You could use a standard ‘out of the box’ approval workflow for this. No SPD required.
    "Last but not least – would like to be able to keep a historic library of the documents"
    The library that the documents would be uploaded to could also function as a historic library of the documents. Perhaps your default view could only include recently uploaded documents. No SPD required. Some useful info
    here.
    Cheers
    Matt

  • Return For Correction - SIT

    Hello,
    when approver go for return for correction (RFC) on SIT, the main SIT page opens where initiator can able to add new records and also able to update any existing SIT records. This thing not happen in Absence work flow where on RFC, user update only current record which is under consideration.
    In actual it should update only that SIT record which is currently under consideration and not allow other records to modify.
    Thanks

    In actual it should update only that SIT record which is currently under consideration and not allow other records to modify.Ayaz
    this is a very valid question .. and same thing happens with EIT as well. This happens because when you create or update EITs, SITs you can do more than one at a time at the time of creation/ updation. So when approver go to update action or send it back for return for correction you create/ update multiple EITs and SITs as all of that go in single transaction.
    Let us know if you find any solution for this one.

  • Approve button of PO Approval Notification not functioning properly

    Hello,
    We are using PO approval workflow for our PO approval process.
    The approve button of the email notification is not performing the intended action, that is approving the PO.
    Since the approve is not functioning,we had to approve it from oracle.Is there any reason for this?
    Kindly let me know if there is some solution to handle such issues.This is a critical issue because not all the approvers can login
    to oracle and approve this everytime.
    Thanks in advance,
    indu

    Pl post details of OS, database and EBS versions. Has inbound processing been enabled ? Has this approval process ever worked ? If so, what changes have been made that caused it to break ? Are there any error messages in the workflow log file ?
    Configuring the Oracle Workflow 2.6/11i.OWF.H Java-based Notification Mailer with Oracle Application          (Doc ID 268085.1)
    Example Of Configuring Workflow Java Notification Mailer With Oracle Applications 11.5.x          (Doc ID 249957.1)
    Inbound Processing Is Not Happening While Approving/Rejecting From Emails          (Doc ID 418931.1)
    How To Troubleshoot When Email Notification Responses Are Processed But The Approval Workflow Still          (Doc ID 458665.1)
    Troubleshooting Inbound Email Notifications          (Doc ID 1184846.1)
    A Guide For Troubleshooting Workflow Notification Emails - Inbound and Outbound          (Doc ID 831982.1)
    HTH
    Srini

  • How to hide REASSIGN Button for PO Requisition Approval Notification only

    Hello,
    I have a requirement in which I have to HIDE the REASSIGN button from the PO Requisition Approval Notification page. I realized that this page(NotifDetailsPG.xml) is being used by Sourcing Module too for sending the Approval Notifications. So I cannot directly set the Rendered Property to False for this as this would hide the REASSIGN button in Sourcing Approval Notification too.
    So, how do I hide the REASSIGN button from the Notification page only if the Page is being used as PO Requisition Approval Notification? Can I use SPEL command in this case? Can somebody help me with this issue?
    Thanks
    Sunny
    Edited by: user13369509 on May 16, 2011 7:39 AM

    Hi Srini,
    Thanks for the Immediate Response, I reviwed the Maetalink Note which you suggested, it was stated as:
    Starting from ATG_PG.H.Rollup 4, an enhancement has been made to the Notification Details screen.
    When the user viewing the notification has been granted the Workflow Administrator privilege (through the WF_ADMIN_ROLE preference), then the Reassign button will always be visible, even when the message attribute #HIDE_REASSIGN is set to Y.
    This allows Administrators to reassign any notification when necessary in exception cases.
    But in my case, the user do not have the Workflow Administrator privilege. He was not assigned with any workflow Admin Resps. Is there anything I am missing to check the WF_ADMIN_ROLE preference for a particular user?
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • SSHR - Alert notification

    Hi,
    I am using a SIT in SSHR which is routing for approval. Suppose, if the initiator clicked "Save for Later" button with the required information, a record is inserted into HR_API_TRANSACTIONS and other two HR_API_ tables.
    Based on the record insertion in HR_API_TRANSACTION table, I am sending an alert to some employees. The alert is fired even the initiator clicked "Save for Later" button instead of "Submit" button.
    How can I trigger an alert only after the initiator clicked "Submit" button?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Here is the meaning of different values in the column:-
    D - Deleted
    C - Cancelled
    E - Error
    RI - Return for Correction
    RIS - Return for Correction + Save For Later
    S - Save for Later
    W - Review page
    Y - Pending Approval
    YS - Pending Approval + Save for Later
    Source :- Metalink note, What is the Meaning of Statuses in HR_API_TRANSACTIONS Table? [ID 438346.1]
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Avinash

  • Extend the notification time out for SSHR approval requests

    Hi,
    I want to extend the due date (Approval notification time out) of SSHR notification approval from 3 to 5. But I could not able to found any attribute having 3 days (4320 minutes). In hrssa workflow, I have found the constant value 525600 for attribute HR_APPROVER_NTF_TIMEOUT_ATTR (Approver Notification timeout in Minutes).
    Please help out how to change value of notification time out?
    Regards,
    Umar

    Hi Kashif / Hassnain
    I follow the given steps in suggested notes and did required changes for five days. It gives following errors while saving the workflow.
    Note: It is the first time; I am doing modification in workflow. Please guide, is there any prerequisite which I need to follow before doing changes in workflow?
    Errors:*
    382: Design Validation generated 12 warning(s). You may save invalid definitions but they should not be used in running process.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_SAVE_FOR_LATER_OTHER_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_SAVE_FOR_LATER'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_NOTIFY_RFC_OTHER_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_NOTIFY_RFC_INITIATOR_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_NOTFY_APPROVER_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_INITIATOR_SFL_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_INITIATOR_RFC_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPROVER_SFL_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPROVER_RFC_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPROVER_NTF'.
    351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
    354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPRAISAL_REJECTED_PRC'.
    362: Validation failed for child activity 'HRSSA/HR_NTF_FINAL_REJ_EMP_V4_NTF'.
    383: Notification activity must be assigned a performer when used in a process.
    328: 'SAVE' validation failed for message 'HRSSA/HR_APPRAISAL_MACHANGE_MGR_MSG'.
    401: Could not find token 'APPRAISEE_NAME' among message attributes

  • AP Approval Notification - URL not displayed correctly

    Hi,
    we are working in R12 on the AP Invoice Notification for approval. We are displaying all invoice details and the customer had an URL displayed correctly in the notification in R11. The URL is pointing to an Scan of the actual Invoice.
    In R12 we are not able to te get the URL correctly displayed on the notification. Since the URL is pointing to an picture (in TIF format), the notification tries to embed the picture. We would like to display the URL.
    Any suggestions how to get this done?
    Thx Roel.

    We found the solution.
    We added the string 'LNK:' right before the URL and this worked.

  • Missing Subject line for the Approval Notification Mail

    Hi,
    We use CUP 5.3 SP7. We have configured the system for role based approval. We found that the approval notification mail being sent without any Subject line. It's configurable to set the admin mail id, but couldn't find one to set the Subject.
    We get the following content in the mail....
    View <http://<host:port>/AE/index.jsp?verifyApproverLogin.do........................>
    Can we set it somewhere from the configuration?
    Regards, Anil

    Hi Alpesh,
    Thx for your reply..But i think you missed my point...Let me try to explain it again...
    When we submit a request, the system triggers a notification mail to the approver(s). And this mail seems to be missing a Subject line... and it's shown to be sent from the System E-mail id we set at the SMTP server config.
    I couldn't find a tab for setting the E-mail format for the first approver  neither at the stage nor in the e-mail reminder configuration.
    Perhaps, setting the next approver will help if i had a secondary approver. But we are using a single stage WF in CUP. Am i missing some config step here?
    Regards,
    Anil

Maybe you are looking for

  • Family Sharing music issue

    I have an iPhone 6 and a Macbook Pro that are both updated to the latest software versions.  I have family sharing turned on on both and have been able to successful download some music on both devices. There are many songs that I try and download th

  • Notification center interferes with full-screen apps (incl. games)

    The new notification center interferes with games. When you are making control movements on the screen, a little grey tab keeps appearing at the top middle of the screen. Just from using it, it seems the notification center has a full-screen mode and

  • Error when trying to purchase Flash Pro

    I am trying to buy a subscription to flash pro but keep on getting this error; I cant call the number because I am outside the US

  • Customer Service Hours

    I called these monkies at 6:15 AM, was told by the machine to call back during "regular business hours" I thought their business hours are 6AM - 11PM, 7 days a week? Called back at 7:00AM, got the same message when tried to speak to an actual person.

  • APPLE AND O2 HAVE SCREWED TODAY UP

    What a joke today. Apple your poor. Try microsoft servers. O2 are the dicks of the world as well. What a **** up of the launch. Can't update or activate my new and old iphone. No wonder why apple stock is dropping. It's crap. When will we get our iph