Ridiculously long installation time for CS6?

I'm downloading the CS6 Master Collection through the University of Maryland software center website. I downloaded all the different parts required for installing, and now the installation time remaining says 20 hours and it's still going up. I've closed out all the other applications on my Mac. Is there anything I can do? I can't click go back or continue either.

The same thing is happening to me (downloading from UMD), and I don't think it's a corrupt file.... I've re-downloaded the Master Collection .dmg and .dmgpart files and the Web & Design Collection .dmg and .dmgpart files, and the same thing happens when installing either one. I have to force-quit the installer, do a hard reboot on my computer (it won't let me shut down while it thinks the installer is still running), and then uninstall whatever got installed and run the cleaner.
It always freezes up at about 40% of the way through the installation process, "Running package scripts..." The progress bar doesn't advance even a pixel.... I know this because I took screenshots and compared. The "Install Time Remaining" just keeps getting longer and longer, with no apparent change.

Similar Messages

  • I had backed up my IPhone 4s on iCloud on Jan 19. I am now trying to do another back up but it says the time required is 7 hours. It appears to long a time for 1GB of data stored on the iCloud. Can someone help me please?

    I had backed up my IPhone 4s on iCloud on Jan 19. I am now trying to do another back up but it says the time required is 7 hours. It appears to long a time for 1GB of data stored on the iCloud. Can someone help me please?

    To be honest, that sounds about right.
    For example on my 8Mbps (megbits) down service I get around 0.4Mbps upload.  That is the equivalent of (very approximately) 3Mb (megabytes) per minute or 180Mb per hour.  Over 7 hours that would be just over 1Gb.
    Obviously, it all depends on your connection speed, but that is certainly what I would expect, and that is why I use my computer for backing up, not iCloud.  So much quicker.

  • Anyone else having extra long delivery time for the late 2013 macbook pro 15" 2.6ghz 1tb model?

    Anyone else having extra long delivery time for the late 2013 macbook pro 15" 2.6ghz 1tb model?
    As of today feb 15 i have been waiting for 78 days. Finland doesn't have an official apple store (only authorized resellers) It was my mistake because i should have bought from apple.com. But i think 2.5 months is too long and i have no information about when i can get it..

    The low-end 15” rMBP with a 8 GB or RAM and a 256 GB SSD costs $2,000. 
    The low-end 15” rMBP with a 8 GB or RAM and a 512 GB SSD costs $2,300. 
    With 16 GB of RAM and a 512 GB SSD it costs $2,500.
    The high-end 15” rMBP with a 16 GB of RAM and a 512 GB SSD costs $2,600.
    All cost $500 dollars more with a 1 TB SSD.
    So the SSD size is not a differentiating factor unless you prefer 256 GB.
    If you think you need 16 GB of RAM and a 512 GB SSD then you might as well spend the extra $100 for the high-end model.
    The high-end model will make a difference on gaming and graphics-oriented applications.
    They tend to run other applications at about the same speed.
    Both models are rated with 8 hours of battery life.
    Benchmarks on PhotoShop comparing memory sizes:  https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5659174?tstart=30
    The speed was about 10% different between 8 GB and 16 GB models.
    On other applications your mileage may vary.
    Application benchmarks:
    http://www.macworld.com/article/2059215/15-inch-retina-macbook-pro-review-a-tale -of-two-laptops.html
    The low-end and high-end performed the about the same on non-graphics oriented applications.
    Graphics oriented benchmarks:
    On the Cinebench OpenGL benchmark the high-end was about twice as fast.
    On the Unigine Heaven Benchmark benchmark they ran at about the same speed.
    On the Unigine Valley Benchmark benchmark the high-end was about 1.5x as fast.
    Message was edited by: hands4

  • HT1577 Why am I experiencing long download times for an HD movie rental from itunes?

    I have been experiencing long download times for movie rentals from itunes (this time 11 hours).  I have even tried to use ethernet, turn off simultaneous downloads, and shut down my browser, to speed up the time but that didn't help.  My internet download speed is about 7mbps.  Any suggestions?

    iTunes: Purchasing and viewing HD videos
    When you purchase an HD video on a supported device or computer, only HD video will be downloaded. To download the SD version, you need to download the video again from your Purchased page. Conversely, if you purchase an HD video on an unsupported device, the SD version will be downloaded. Then, you will need to download the HD version from your Purchased page. Learn more about downloading previous purchases."

  • Extremely long display times for HTML in mail and Safari

    Is anyone else experiencing similar lags in HTML rendering?
    Since upgrading to Mountain Lion, I am experiencing extremely long render times for display HTML email messages in mail.   I am also experiencing extremely long render times in Safari.   I have Chrome installed on this same computer, if I goto the same website on Chrome and Safari, Chrome displays the page immediatly, Safari will take between 30sec and 1 minute.  

    The only way it can get fixed is if you report it to Adobe. Posting it here may not be sufficient. There is an Acrobat feature request forum here and a bug report form here: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Long encoding times for footage captured with BMD H.264 Pro Recorder

    Hi there,
    I'm experiencing very long render times when encoding footage captured with the BMD H.264 Pro Recorder. Watching it encode (either through Premiere CS6, or AME) it looks like the encoding stops for periods of time. With other footage I can encode a 50 minute project in about 15-20 minutes, encoding with footage from the Pro Recorder is almost 1:1 in terms of project length/encode time.
    The Pro Recorder uses QuickTime for H.264 captures, so don't know if that is causing issues. Don't seem to have the same issue with other H.264 formats.
    System Info:
    Windows 8 Enterprise (RTM)
    HP Z820 with dual hexcore processors, 32GB RAM
    Quadro 2000 plus Tesla for Maximus configuration
    All latest updates have been installed (yesterday)
    MPE is enabled for project
    Also tested on a Z800 with Windows 7 and got same results
    Editing the footage is fast and playback through timeline looks great. Anyone have a suggestion?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    QuickTime is still a 32 bit process and the 64 bit PP has to use a sort of "band-aid" to make QuickTime files work right.  It's possible that might slow things down.

  • D7000 H.264 to ProRes - Ridiculously long conversion times

    When converting the D7000 footage from h.264 to ProRes for editing in Final Cut, it's taking absolutely ridiculously long to do so, even with short clips. I primarily use the Canon 7D. When converting 7D footage with those same output settings, it's acceptable the time it takes. But, with the D7000's footage, it's then astronomically longer of a process.
    Does anyone know why? I'm assuming it has to do with the higher compression of the Nikon footage, but I wanted to see if there is anymore light to be shed on this.
    Thanks in advance for taking time to read through this.
    Evan

    Shooting on the D7000, I used Image Capture to import a 2 minute 1080p24 clip that was 325 megs,
    Compressor processed it to ProRes422LT using 7 of my 8 cores in about 7 minutes to a file that is now 1.2 gigs.
    So, roughly, I'm looking at 6-8 times real time to process H,264 to ProResLT into a file that is roughly 4x the size of the  original.
    The image is lovely but shooting through my Nikkor primes has several negative aspects, most notably, today's autofocus lenses have focus barrels that go through the entire range in 120 to 200 degrees. My ancient manual Nikkors had focus rings that used 200 to more than 360 degrees of rotation to go from minimum focual distance to infinity. This, in combination with a split image rangefinder or microprism, meant precision focus was easy to achieve on the older lenses. Today's lenses have tolerances that are too tight for manual focus, merely letting go of the focusing barrel pushes the lens past the exact focus point. Of course, a precision focusing aid is not an option on any of Nikon's "professional" cameras these days.
    Auto focus tracking while shooting is unreliable and unprofessionally lame. Manually tracking focus while shooting requires a very good monitor hood/magnifier. This requirement alone makes the whole DSLR video thing totally stupid and completely amateurish. Even though I scored a new camera, I'm stuck with this lame process because some pinhead at my company has suddenly decided bokeh is cool.
    Why doesn't Nikon just adapt their CMOS, lens mount and basic controls to a dedicated, fully professional digital cinema camera?
    bogiesan

  • Long execution times for TestStand conditional statements

    I have two test stations – one here, one at the factory in China that has been operating for about a year. The test program uses TestStand 3.1 and calls primarily dll's developed using CVI. Up until a couple months ago, both test stations performed in a similar manner, then the computer at the factory died and was replaced with a new, faster computer. Now the same test sequence at the factory take three times as long to execute (30 min at the facotry, 10min here).
    I have recoded the execution time at various point during the execution, and have found that the extra times seems to be occurring during the evaluation of conditional statements in TestStand (i.e. for loops, if statements, case statements). For example, one particular ‘for’ evaluation takes 30 ms on the test station here, but takes 400 ms at the test station at the factory (note: this is just the evaluation of the for condition, not the execution of the steps contained within the for loop).
    The actual dll calls seem to be slightly faster with the new computer.
    Also the ‘Module Times’ reported don’t seem to match the actual time for the module for the computer at the factory. For example, for the following piece of TestStand code:
    Label1
    Subsequence Call
    Label2
    I record the execution time to the report text in both Label1 and Label2. Subtracting one from the other gives me about 18 seconds. However the ‘Module Time’ recorded for ‘Subsequence Call’ is only 3.43 seconds.
    Any body have any ideas why the long execution time with the new computer? I always setup the computers in exactly the same way, but maybe there is a TestStand setting somewhere that I have missed? Keep in mind, both test stations are running exactly the same revision of code.

    Got some more results from the factory this morning:
    1) Task Manager shows that the TestExec.exe is the only thing using CPU to any significant degree. Also CPU Usage History show that the CPU Usage never reaches 100%.
    2) I sent a new test program that will log test execution time in more places. Longer execution times are seen in nearly every area of the program, but one area where this is very dramatic is the time taken to return from one particular subsequence call. In this subsequence I log the time just before the <End Group> at then end of Main. There is nothing in Cleanup. I then log the time immediately after returning from this sequence. On the test system I have here this takes approximately 160 ms. On the test system at the factory this takes approximately 14.5 seconds! The program seems to be hanging here for some reason. Every time this function is called the same thing happens and for the same amount of time (and this function is called about 40 times in the test program, so this is kill me).

  • Long wait time for /sap/webcuif/uif_callback

    STAD shows following record indicating a very long wait time. Seems the application /sap/webcuif/uif_callback mentioned in the record is a CRM WebClient UI framework related service defined in transaction SICF. I did not observe such long wait time on other HTTP requests and applications. Why could this happen? How to analyze further? The system is CRM703 SP03.
    CPU time                       0 ms
    RFC+CPIC time                  0 ms
    Total time in workprocs        3 ms
       Response time           49.658 ms
    Wait for work process     49.655 ms
    Processing time                2 ms
    Load time                      0 ms
    Generating time                0 ms
    Roll (in+wait) time            0 ms
    Database request time          0 ms
    Enqueue time                   0 ms
    Number      Roll ins            1
                 Roll outs           1
                 Enqueues            0
    Load time   Program             0  ms
                 Screen              0  ms
                 CUA interf.         0  ms
    Roll time   Out                 0  ms
                 In                  0  ms
                 Wait                0  ms
    Frontend    No.roundtrips       0
                 GUI time            0  ms
                 Net time            0  ms
    Call number                                         6
    Connection-Id          6CAE8B34B9581ED49BF5441DA68E2F2A
    Communication step     Send/Receive
    Timestamp              20141119 131100 CST
    Host                   XXXXXXXXX
    Port                   8001
    Path                   /sap/webcuif/uif_callback
    Status phrase          OK
    Status code              200
    Protocol               HTTP
    Method                 POST
    Virtual host               0
    Calling time                                        2  ms
    Remote exec. time                                   0  ms
    Data send time                                      0  ms
    Data receive time                                   0  ms
    Idle time                                           1  ms
    Sent data                                         107  Bytes
    Received data                                   2.682  Bytes
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Jason

    Hello Jason,
    the "Wait for work process" means the request was at the dispatcher queue waiting for a work process.
    Probably at that time all  the DIA work processes in that instance were occupied.
    was that the case?
    kind regards,
    Mercedes

  • Long loading times for Safari on iPad Air with iOS8

    I've had long loading times in Safari sInce upgrading to iOS8 on my iPad Air 128 GB. Are any of you having the same experience?

    Sometimes I question myself, how come that iOS being held in beta for over quarter or even over a half a year, and most certainly long enough in alpha, still comes out so much raw and buggy every release? Sometimes it feels like it's only getting worse concerning the debugging.
    I wanted to address the HR manager of the Apple Inc. to query him/her about HIS/HER dedication to the overall work being done. Why, the ****, does Safari get slow, why, the ****, is it unpredictable to define whether a sound stream in Safari's tab will end upon tab closure or not. Morever, why do iPhone iMessages fail to mark a message or a chain as a read one even thought you just really did it. Beyond that miriad of similar questions I have just another three, since when is it official Apple support position to advise you to wipe out your device and install everything back from iTunes, not the cloud? But what is more important, how come that support representative tells you first to back up your buggy iPad, wipe it out and restore from that backup both with iTunes? Finally, we all know how Apple does cherish it's developers, can somebody tell me how, for heavens sake, this website ever possible to exist then — Texts From Xcode?
    I don't want neither need to mention that switching between tabs in iOS7 (I have had no chance to test it in iOS8) in Safari never gave you any sure answer whether your tab will be reloaded when you get back or not: whether have you copy any post before leaving, to paste back on return or not.
    After all I do still love Apple, I do love people's ideas. I do love the overall outcome, but I want to tell Mr. Cook one phrase I heard when I used to be a head of a department in a medium size company and had to deal with continuous fails of the personnel and most often ended up doing much things myself, it was not the exact situation as with Apple although I hope you can trace a path: If a manager has to do anything besides managing he or she failed to manage one major issue — the personnel one.

  • Long startup time for Digital Editions Version 4.x

    Hello
    I've updated the digital editions at my notebook form version 3.x to 4.x
    I've access to all documents from version 3.x, but the start up time for
    Digital Editions is very long, approximately up to two minutes!

    In $DAC_HOME/CustomSQLs/customsql.xml
    there is a part about analyze table:
    <SqlQuery name = "ORACLE_ANALYZE_TABLE" STORED_PROCEDURE = "TRUE">
    DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(ownname => '@TABLEOWNER', tabname => '%1', estimate_percent => DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE, method_opt => 'FOR ALL INDEXED COLUMNS SIZE AUTO',cascade => false, degree => DBMS_STATS.DEFAULT_DEGREE)
    </SqlQuery>
    you can change DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE to a constant (eg 10 for 10%). However it will impact the analyses for all DWH tables.

  • Extremely long hold time for Customer Service

    First couple of times I called for help, I got an answer within 15 minutes. Last couple of times it was close to 90 minutes. Today, I have been on hold for almost 2 hours! This is ridiculous from a company as good as Adobe. If I didn't have an open case which was pending Adobe response, I would hang up again and try back. CS is suffering lately and I'm very dissappointed.
    I don't appreciate the apparent cut in CS personnel stateside and subsequent outsourcing to India and other foriegn sites.
    Tossing in the towel - I cannot afford to hold this long. It's been over 2.5 hours. This kind of wait time is unforgiveable.

    You're not alone.  Adobe apologized for the recent downward trend in support this week in a press release and on the website.  Is the issue something technical that we can help with here?
    Here's the text of the release:
    Open Letter to Adobe Customers
    Adobe is committed to providing the most advanced, innovative products and services in the world. Recently, however, our customers have experienced a level of service that is inconsistent with what they expect and deserve. This is unacceptable and we sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused. We are working diligently — in fact, teams are working around the clock — to resolve these issues. I'd like to thank all our customers who are sharing feedback and giving us the opportunity to respond. We appreciate your loyalty, support, and willingness to make your concerns heard.
    Adobe is in the process of transitioning to a new global service provider that will help grow and improve the quality of our customer service worldwide. While our new partner is a recognized leader in service and support solutions, this is a major global transition that includes bringing more than 800 new agents onboard. Clearly this process has not gone as smoothly as we had planned, and we are working to immediately remedy the situation. We are confident that once this transition is completed, we will provide customers with new and better ways to engage with Adobe using their preferred methods, helping to ensure prompt, effective customer service.
    The Adobe Customer Care leadership team is monitoring our customers' experiences closely to understand and respond to the challenges you are encountering. If you experience difficulties of any kind, contacting Customer Service in your local region remains the best initial course of action; however, during this transition period, unresolved issues can also be directed to [email protected].
    Thank you for your patience and understanding as we make this transition and work to improve our service and support operations for customers around the world.
    Regards,
    Lambert Walsh
    Vice President, Technical Services

  • Silent installation + activation for CS6 design and web premium - volume license

    Hi All,
    I am having CS6 design and web premium - volume license and i am facing with a difficulty that we have to choose options for installation, also all of our computers are working behind proxy, therefore there is no direct internet which is causing problem with activation. Can you any suggest me away to implement silent install and activation without internet for bulk PCs ( about 500).
    Thanks,

    Can you login as the Hidden admin account and then run the installation,
    http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/enable-the-hidden-administrator-account-on-wi ndows-vista/

  • Installation Incomplete for CS6 - Any ideas?

    Exit Code: 6
    Please see specific errors and warnings below for troubleshooting. For example,  ERROR: DW050 ... WARNING: DF012, DF029 ...
    -------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
    - 0 fatal error(s), 2 error(s), 3 warning(s)
    ----------- Payload: {CFA46C39-C539-4BE9-9364-495003C714AD} Adobe SwitchBoard 2.0 2.0.0.0 -----------
    WARNING: DF029: ARKServiceControl::StartService: Service not started/stopped SwitchBoard. Current State: 0 Exit Code: 0 Service Specific Exit Code: 0(Seq 1)
    ----------- Payload: {CA7C485C-7A89-11E1-B2C8-CD54B377BC52} Adobe Fireworks CS6 12.0.0.0 -----------
    WARNING: DF012: File/Folder does not exist at D:\Adobe CS6\payloads\AdobeFireworks12-mul\OEM(Seq 2141)
    ----------- Payload: {05E1E278-7A8D-11E1-A0B9-FC0245DB7244} Adobe Fireworks CS6_AdobeFireworks12en_USLanguagePack 12.0.0.0 -----------
    WARNING: DF012: File/Folder does not exist at D:\Adobe CS6\payloads\AdobeFireworks12en_USLanguagePack\OEM(Seq 76)
    ----------- Payload: {AC76BA86-1033-F400-7760-000000000005} Acrobat Professional 10.0.0.0 -----------
    ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1635 - This update package could not be opened. Verify that the update package exists and that you can access it, or contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid Windows Installer update package.
    MSI Error message:
    ERROR: DW050: The following payload errors were found during install:
    ERROR: DW050:  - Acrobat Professional: Install failed

    Hi chris32bit,
    Please refer the kb: http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/errors-exit-code-6-exit.html for Exit code 6.
    Regards,
    Romit Sinha

  • Menu Bar Icons disappear/Long boot times for apps

    This is what my menu bar looks like. Also, it is taking forever for apps to open and boot time is longer than normal. Any Idea what could be the problem? I already deleted any 3rd party app I recently downloaded and deleted all files I recently downloaded as well. Let me know what you all think. Thanks

    I don't think that is the issue, as I do not even have that option in my Desktop & Screen Saver preferences. Below is what I see.
    Also, notice the forward and back arrows in the top let, as well as the + and - icons are missing. This is how all of my windows are. Any other ideas? Any other info I can provide to help?
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for